Table 3.
Represents the anthelmintic activity of the different extracts of Chenopodium album.
| Conc. (mg/ml) | Paralysis Time (Minutes) Mean ± SD |
Death Time (Minutes) Mean ± SD |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VC | PCT | CAPE | CAEE | CAME | CAHE | CAAE | VC | PCT | CAPE | CAEE | CAME | CAHE | CAAE | |
| 2 | --- | 153.43 ± 1.49∗ | 161.10 ± 1.34∗# | 135.45 ± 1.61∗# | 216.25 ± 1.99∗# | --- | --- | --- | 352.49 ± 2.46∗ | 380.23 ± 1.34∗# | 320.66 ± 2.09∗# | 390.89 ± 2.33∗# | --- | --- |
| 4 | --- | 101.52 ± 1.43∗ | 109.10 ± 1.50∗# | 85.95 ± 1.36∗# | 128.40 ± 1.67∗# | --- | --- | --- | 194.16 ± 1.31∗ | 210.72 ± 2.01∗# | 179.86 ± 2.24∗# | 221.29 ± 2.30∗# | --- | --- |
| 6 | --- | 68.19 ± 1.53∗ | 77.74 ± 2.20∗# | 54.86 ± 1.47∗# | 86.45 ± 1.76∗# | --- | --- | --- | 152.45 ± 1.35∗ | 149.42 ± 1.15∗ | 135.35 ± 1.24∗# | 165.02 ± 2.05∗# | --- | --- |
| 8 | --- | 34.14 ± 2.35∗ | 54.84 ± 1.39∗# | 29.02 ± 1.23∗# | 65.86 ± 1.83∗# | --- | --- | --- | 90.98 ± 1.36∗ | 96.25 ± 1.82∗# | 78.48 ± 1.66∗# | 101.06 ± 1.76∗# | --- | --- |
| 10 | --- | 22.96 ± 1.12∗ | 35.52 ± 1.55∗# | 10.08 ± 1.11∗# | 51.45 ± 1.43∗# | 315.78 ± 2.72∗# | --- | --- | 65.09 ± 1.23∗ | 84.94 ± 1.43∗# | 65.28 ± 2.09∗ | 78.93 ± 171∗# | 492.88 ± 1.81∗# | --- |
∗All the Values are expressed as Mean ± SD; N = 5; Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA followed by Turkey's multiple comparison test, ∗ represents p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle Control, # represents p < 0.05 vs. Standard(PCT); PCT: Piperazine citrate; CAPE: Chenopodium album petroleum ether extract; CAEE: Chenopodium album ethyl acetate extract; CAME: Chenopodium album methanolic extract; CAHE: Chenopodium album hydro alcoholic extract; CAAE: Chenopodium album aqueous extract.