Correction to: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04493-5
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in CI values in Table 2.
For Looking preference (ratio), the 90% CI of estimate should be with a minus sign − 0.15, − 0.03.
For Human activity preference (ratio), the 90% CI of estimate should be with a minus sign − 0.30, − 0.08.
The correct Table 2 is given below.
Table 2.
Eye tracking data for ASD and HC groups
Taska | Mean ASD (N = 38) | Mean control (N = 19) | Estimate of difference ASD-HC | 90% CI of estimate | P value | Cohen’s f2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Activity monitoring | ||||||
Activity (ratio) | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.05 | − 0.01, 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.34 |
Background (ratio) | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.04 | − 0.010, 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.13 |
Body (ratio) | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.03 | − 0.0003, 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.16 |
Distractors (ratio) | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.03 | − 0.006, 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
Head (ratio) | 0.25 | 0.37 | − 0.11 | − 0.16, − 0.07 | 0.00019b | 0.65 |
Person (ratio) | 0.38 | 0.47 | − 0.09 | − 0.14, − 0.04 | 0.005 | 0.52 |
Biodetection | ||||||
d-prime (masked condition) | 1.53 | 1.58 | − 0.06 | − 0.65, 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.21 |
Latency (ms) | 300.37 | 274.34 | 26.02 | − 20.23, 72.28 | 0.36 | 0.11 |
Looking preference (ratio) | 0.60 | 0.69 | − 0.09 | − 0.15, − 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.35 |
Orienting preference (ratio) | 0.49 | 0.50 | − 0.01 | − 0.05, 0.03 | 0.62 | 0.03 |
WAVW | ||||||
Background (ratio) | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.01 | − 0.01, 0.04 | 0.39 | 0.20 |
Body (ratio) | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.02 | − 0.01, 0.05 | 0.28 | 0.21 |
Eyes (ratio) | 0.40 | 0.42 | − 0.03 | − 0.11, 0.06 | 0.59 | 0.10 |
Head (ratio) | 0.74 | 0.78 | − 0.03 | − 0.09, 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.22 |
Mouth (ratio) | 0.25 | 0.26 | − 0.01 | − 0.09, 0.06 | 0.76 | 0.09 |
Gaze discrimination | ||||||
Eyes (ratio) | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.01 | − 0.07, 0.09 | 0.84 | 0.04 |
Inside face (ratio) | 0.92 | 0.94 | − 0.02 | − 0.07, 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.049 |
Mouth (ratio) | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.008 | − 0.03, 0.05 | 0.71 | 0.01 |
Nose (ratio) | 0.33 | 0.38 | − 0.05 | − 0.12, 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.13 |
Gender discrimination | ||||||
Eyes (ratio) | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.04 | − 0.02, 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.14 |
Inside face (ratio) | 0.91 | 0.93 | − 0.03 | − 0.08, 0.03 | 0.39 | 0.05 |
Mouth (ratio) | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.02 | − 0.02, 0.07 | 0.42 | 0.06 |
Nose (ratio) | 0.45 | 0.54 | − 0.09 | − 0.16, − 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.20 |
Human activity preference (Social vs Geometric) | ||||||
Human activity preference (ratio) | 0.60 | 0.79 | − 0.19 | − 0.30, − 0.08 | 0.007 | 0.32 |
Total | ||||||
Composite score | − 0.08 | 0.41 | − 0.48 | − 0.86, − 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.30 |
Estimate refers to estimated mean differences between ASD and HC derived from an analysis of Covariance model
P values less than 0.00094 are considered statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment
aCategories in each task (e.g. Activity, Background) refers to the time spent looking at this aspect of the visual scene in relation to the overall looking time
bMeasure that survived Bonferroni correction
ASD Autism spectrum disorder, HC healthy control, WAVW Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf
The original article has been corrected.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.