Abstract
Necroptosis is mediated by signaling complexes called necrosomes, which contain receptor-interacting protein 3 (RIP3) and upstream effectors, such as RIP1. In necrosomes, the RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) of RIP3 and RIP1 forms amyloidal complex. But how the amyloidal necrosomes control RIP3 activation and cell necroptosis has not been determined. Here, we showed that RIP3 amyloid fibrils could further assemble into large fibrillar networks which presents as cellular puncta during necroptosis. A viral RHIM-containing necroptosis inhibitor M45 could form heteroamyloid with RIP3 in cells and prevent RIP3 puncta formation and cell necroptosis. We characterized mutual antagonism between RIP3–RHIM and M45–RHIM in necroptosis regulation, which was caused by distinct inter-filament interactions in RIP3, M45 amyloids revealed with atomic force microscopy. Moreover, double mutations Asn464 and Met468 in RIP3–RHIM to Asp disrupted RIP3 kinase-dependent necroptosis. While the mutant RIP3(N464D/M468D) could form amyloid as wild type upon necroptosis induction. Based on these results, we propose that RIP3 amyloid formation is required but not sufficient in necroptosis signaling, the ordered inter-filament assembly of RIP3 is critical in RIP3 amyloid mediated kinase activation and cell necroptosis.
Subject terms: Kinases, Cell biology, Protein aggregation
Introduction
Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrosis induced by some stress signals related to injury or infection, such as the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family of cytokines, interferons (IFNs), or lipopolysaccharide [1–4]. Necroptosis execution is mainly controlled by receptor-interacting protein 3 (RIP3) kinase and its substrate mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) [5–7]. In TNF-induced necroptosis, the RIP3 activation is mediated by RIP1, which interacts with RIP3 through its RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domains, forming a specific signaling complex named the necrosome [5–7]. In addition to RIP1 and RIP3, only TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β (TRIF) and DNA-dependent activator of interferon regulatory factors (DAI) have been identified as RHIM-containing proteins in the human genome [8, 9]. TRIF is a cytosolic adapter of Toll-like receptors, and DAI is a sensor of cytoplasmic viral RNA [10, 11]. Both TRIF and DAI can trigger necroptosis through RHIM-dependent recruitment of RIP1 and RIP3 (or RIP3 only when RIP1 is absent) [12–17]. In addition, mammalian RHIMs such as RIP1/3 can form amyloid in vitro and in necrotic cells. Mutants of the conserved residues in the RHIM of RIP1/3 have shown defects in fibril formation and mediating cell necrosis [18, 19]. Thus, RHIM-dependent RIP1/RIP3 amyloid structures are required for necroptosis signal propagation.
RHIM-containing necroptosis regulators have been found in viruses [20, 21]. M45 from murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) has been reported to inhibit the virus-induced DAI-RIP3 necroptosis pathway [22]. In addition, the M45 homolog ICP6 from herpes simplex virus type 1 inhibits TNF-induced necroptosis in human cells but can induce mouse cell necroptosis [23–26]. M45 and ICP6 are large proteins with over 1000 amino acids consisting of an N-terminal RHIM domain and a C-terminal ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) large subunit (R1)—homology domain [27]. Interestingly, when the M45–RHIM is changed to an ICP6-RHIM, the ICP6-RHIM-containing M45 gains the ability to induce necroptosis in mouse cells [23]. This suggests that these different RHIM domains perform distinct functions by either promoting or inhibiting cell necroptosis. Thus, elucidating how the necroptosis-inhibiting factor M45 blocks necroptosis through its RHIM domain would provide critical insights into the RHIM-dependent necroptosis signaling.
In this study, we found that the accurate inhibitory peptide of the viral necroptosis inhibitor M45 is coincided with M45–RHIM. M45–RHIM binds with RIP3 to form heteroamyloids in cells upon necroptosis induction, and block RIP3 amyloids further assembly into cellular puncta. M45–RHIM and RIP3–RHIM can form fibrils with different morphology in electron microscopy (EM). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) results showed that the morphological differences were caused by the distinct inter-filament interactions, which suggests the structure based the mutual antagonism between RIP3–RHIM and M45–RHIM. In line with that, RIP3 mutant which disrupted the proper inter-filament interactions could not induce necroptosis. These data suggested the ordered inter-filament assembly of RIP3–RHIM into the high-ordered RIP3 amyloid networks as cellular puncta is a critical step of necroptosis signaling, which could be blocked by specific mutations of RIP3 or via the formation of neutralized M45–RIP3 hetero-RHIM amyloids.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
z-VAD and SMAC mimetic compound were used as described previously [24]. Recombinant TNF and IFN-γ were purified in our lab. Necrostatin-1 (HY-15760) and AP20187 (HY-13992) are bought from MCE. Anti-ICP6 polyclonal antibodies were raised in rabbits using E. coli-expressed His-tagged ICP6 (1–177 aa). The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-Flag (F3165), anti-Myc (SAB4700448), and anti-mRIP3 (R4277) (Sigma); anti-RIP (D94C12), anti-phospho-RIP (65746S), and anti-hRIP3 (13526S) (Cell Signaling Technology); anti-Phospho-RIP3 (ab209384) and anti-FKBP (ab108420) (Abcam); and anti-actin (PM053-7) (MBL).
Cell survival assay
The cells were seeded into 96-well plates and allowed to grow for about 12 h at the following density: L929 cells and NIH-3T3 cells, 5000 cells/well; HeLa cells, 6000 cells/well; HT-29 human colon cancer cells, 8000 cells/well. The cells then were treated as indicates (the details were showed in the figures and figure legends). And the cell survival was measured using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Luminescence was recorded with an EnSpire Multimode Plate Reader from PerkinElmer.
Cell culture and stable cell lines
HEK293T cells, HeLa cells, NIH-3T3 cells, HT-29 human colon cancer cells, and L929 mouse fibroblast cells were obtained from cell bank of CAS (Shanghai). HeLa-RIP3 cells were established as previously described [5, 24, 28]. HT-29 (RIP1-KO) and L929 (RIP1-KO) cells were generated by using the CRISPR/Cas9 editing technique. The KO cells were determined by the sequencing of targeted loci. All cells were cultured in DMEM/HIGH with L-glutamine, without sodium pyruvate (HyClone). All media were supplemented with 10% Foundation™ FBS (Gemini) and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (HyClone). All cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and tested to be mycoplasma-negative by the standard PCR method. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen), or EZ transfection (Shanghai Life-iLab Biotech Co., Ltd) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Plasmids and molecular cloning
ICP6 and M45 cDNA was PCR-amplified from a reverse-transcribed cDNA library. Full-length or mutated cDNAs of ICP6 and M45 were cloned into the lentiviral vector pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-copGFP (Addgene) using standard PCR and cloning methods. The WT and mutated RIP1 and RIP3 cDNAs were also cloned into the modified lentiviral vector pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-copRFP. All plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing. The details of the primer sequences are available upon request.
Lentivirus preparation and infection
For lentivirus production, HEK293T cells were transfected with lentiviral vectors (pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-copGFP/copRFP) and virus packing plasmids (psPAX2 and pMD2.G, Addgene) by using EZ transfection reagents (Shanghai Life-iLab Biotech Co., Ltd). The virus-containing medium was harvested 48 h later and added to the cells as indicated, with 10 μg/ml polybrene. The infection medium was changed with fresh medium 24 h later.
CRISPR/Cas9
The Cas9-target sites are as follows: human RIP1: 5′-GCTCGGGCGCCATGTAGTAG-3′ and mouse RIP1: 5′-GAAAGGAAGGATAATCGTGG-3′ and 5′-CACCGCTGGAGGTATGGTTCAGCA-3′. The Cas9-target sites were cloned into the PX330 (Addgene) vector. All plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing. The details of the primer sequences are available upon request.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
Cells infected with the indicated lentivirus were cultured on 10 cm dishes and grown to confluence. Cells treated as indicated were washed once with DPBS and harvested by scraping and centrifugation at 1000 × g for 3 min. The harvested cells were washed with DPBS and lysed for 30 min on ice in lysis buffer containing 25 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton, 10% glycerol, and complete protease inhibitor (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche) cocktails. The cell lysates were then centrifuged at a top speed of 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The soluble fraction was collected, and the protein concentration was determined by a Bradford assay. For direct immunoblot analysis, the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and detected using antibodies, as indicated. For immunoprecipitation, 1 mg of extracted protein in lysis buffer was immunoprecipitated overnight with anti-Flag or anti-Myc magnetic beads (Bimake) at 4 °C. After incubation, the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer, then directly boiled in 1X SDS loading buffer and subjected to immunoblot analysis.
In vitro kinase assay
HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag tagged M45 or RIP3, respectively. After 24 h, RIP3 with or without M45 was immunopurified with anti-Flag magnetic beads (Bimake) at 4 °C overnight. The Flag beads were washed four times with kinase buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 0.02% BSA, 150 mM ATP, and 1 mM DTT).Then kinase buffer with the GSK872 (10 μm) was added and incubated at 30 °C for 20 min. After that, 1 μg purified recombinant MLKL was added and reacted at 30 °C for 30 min. Finally, the reaction mixtures were subjected to western blotting analysis.
Protein expression and purification
The recombinant proteins of MLKL produced as described in previous work [28]. Human wild-type and mutant RIP3 (418–518 aa) with 6×His at the N-terminus was expressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells and induced with 0.8 mM isopropyl b-d-thiogalactoside (Sangon Biotech) at 37 °C for 5 h. The RIP3 peptides were recovered from inclusion bodies by dissolving 20 ml of buffer containing 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 300 mM NaCl. The denatured RIP3 peptides were purified by Ni-NTA beads 6FF (Smart-Life Science) and then dialyzed with 1 L of pure water at 4 °C. The harvested RIP3 precipitates were dissolved in 25% (v/v) acetic acid solution and further purified by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography run on a Waters HPLC machine (2545) at room temperature with a linear gradient of 30–70% aqueous-organic solvent over 10 min at 20 ml/min using an XBridge® Peptide BEH C18 column (130 Åpore, 5.0 μm beads, 19 × 100 mm column, Waters). The aqueous phase consisted of a buffer of Milli-Q H2O with 0.05% TFA and an organic solvent of ACN with 0.05% TFA. The purified protein was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and dried at −80 °C.
Analysis of stability of intracellular RIP3 aggregation in pellet fraction
HT-29 or Hela cells infected with the indicated lentivirus were treated with T/S/Z for 6 or 8 h. Then, the cells were washed in DPBS and pelleted by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 10 min. The cells were resuspended in 5× volume of buffer A (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 40 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 250 mM sucrose, complete protease inhibitor (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche) cocktails), and homogenized by passing through a 30 G needle 50 times. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 12 min, the supernatant was harvested and recentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 90 min with BECKMA’s ultracentrifuge and the supernatants were harvested as S100. The pellets were resuspended in the same volume of buffer A as P100, for stability assessment of the endogenous M45/RIP3 aggregation. The P100 pellets were resuspended in the same volume of buffer A supplemented with 4 M urea, 8 M urea, or 150 mM NaOH and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h and the pellet was harvested resuspended in the same volume of buffer A as P100. All centrifugations were performed at 4 °C unless otherwise indicated. The samples of S100 and P100 were subjected to western blot analysis with RIP3 or M45 antibodies.
Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy
HeLa-RIP3 cells infected with the indicated lentivirus were plated on coverslips overnight and treated as indicated. The cells were washed once with PBS and fixed with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. After permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS and blockade of nonspecific binding with 4% FBS in PBS, the cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody in PBS. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated for 60 min with Alexa Fluor 633-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen). The nuclei were stained with DAPI (Southern Biotech). All images were captured and processed using identical settings on a Zeiss LSM 710 laser scanning confocal microscope with a ×60 oil objective. Duplicate cultures were performed, and similar results were obtained in at least three independent experiments.
Fibril preparation
M45 (52–71 aa) was chemically synthesized by Guoping Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd (China). RIP3 (418–518 aa) and RIP3 (418–518 aa, N464D/M468D) were prepared in the laboratory, as described in the “Materials and Methods” section. Lyophilized protein powder of RIP3 or M45 was dissolved in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride buffer (pH 7.5) or 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol, and fibrils were formed by dilution in Milli-Q water. The hetero RIP3–M45 fibrils were generated by dilution of an equimolar mixture of denatured RIP3 and M45 peptides in Milli-Q water. The samples were incubated at room temperature for ~3 days and then dialyzed for ~3 days in Milli-Q water at room temperature with Spectra/por®6 Dialysis Membranes (MWCO 3.5 K, W 45 mm, Diam 29 mm; BBI Life Science). The water was changed three times at 6-h intervals during dialysis.
Transmission electron microscopy
One drop of fibril solution was deposited onto a 300-mesh carbon-coated grid (Beijing Zhongjingkeyi Technology) and was kept on the grid for 5 min. The grid was washed twice using Milli-Q water and then stained with 2% uranyl acetate in water (w/v) for negative staining. Finally, excess liquid was blotted off and allowed to air dry. Electron micrographs were recorded with an electron microscope (FEI) Talos L120C (120 kV).
X-ray fibril diffraction
Fibril pellets were collected by ultracentrifugation at 55,000 rpm and 25 °C for 1 h (Optima Max-TL, BECKMAN COULTER). The fibril pellet was then mounted in a loop and exposed to Cu-κ radiation from a Bruker D8 VENTURE X-ray generator at a wavelength of 0.154184 nm, and the distance was 50 mm from the source. Data were collected at room temperature for 1 min on a Bruker D8 VENTURE imaging plate detector.
Atomic force microscopy
A fibril suspension was deposited onto the freshly cleaved mica surface and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The mica sheets were subsequently rinsed twice with Milli-Q water to remove the unbound substance. All imaging was performed under air conditions in tapping mode using antimony (n)-doped Si cantilevers with a constant force of 40 N/m (model RTESPA-300, Bruker, USA) at ~300 kHz on a Dimension Icon AFM with a Bruker Nanoscope V controller (Digital Instruments, Goleta, CA, USA). The images were recorded at a scan rate of 1 Hz. Fibril heights were measured by subtracting the average baseline from the highest peak, generating an accurate reading of the fibril diameters.
Thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence binding
A ThT binding assay was performed using an EnSight™ Multimode Plate Reader by PerkinElmer. ThT was used at a concentration of 46.4 μm in ThT binding buffer. Seeds were prepared by sonicating the diluted fibril solution using a 2 mm sonication probe with a pulse of 3 s work and 3 s rest for 20 cycles at 25% amplitude while keeping the sample on ice. The peptide stock solution was added to ThT binding buffer with or without a 1 μm concentration of the indicated seeds to a final concentration of 10 μm prior to fluorescence measurement. The data were collected by measuring the fluorescence intensity (485 nm) every 2 min for ~2 h and were analyzed with Origin software.
Quantification and statistical analysis
All data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate wells or triplicate wells, and similar results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was carried out with GraphPad Prism 7, GraphPad Software Inc. (San Diego, CA). In cell survival assays, the ATP level of all of control wells in each type of cell was used to check data distribution using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. And the results showed that the data from cell death assays fitted a normal distribution. Statistical significance for the cell death assays was then determined using two-way ANOVA (Figs. 1c, 2f, and S3C) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test when comparing each group to the vehicle control and one-way ANOVA (Fig. 3d, e) or two-way ANOVA (Fig. S3D) followed by a Tukey post hoc test when comparing all pairs of groups. In all tests, the significance of differences between samples is indicated in the figures as follows: ns not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Results
The core necroptosis-inhibitory peptide of M45, Gly45-Thr90
The MCMV protein M45 was discovered as a negative regulator of premature cell death during infection of endothelial cells and macrophages [29]. Subsequent studies found that its function is dependent on RHIM-mediated blockage of necroptosis pathways [22, 30, 31]. M45 consists of an N-terminal RHIM domain and a C-terminal RNR large subunit (R1)-homology domain [27]. To characterize the specific effects of the M45–RHIM and R1 domains in greater detail, we prepared expression vectors that encoded Myc-tagged full-length and truncated forms of M45 with or without mutations of four alanine substitutions disrupting their RHIM domains (Fig. 1a, left). We found that truncated M45 (1–292 aa) can block necroptosis in HT-29 cells and that the RHIM mutants lose this ability (Fig. 1b). This suggests that the RHIM but not the R1 domain of M45 is necessary for this function. We also tested M45 (1–292 aa) in HeLa cells containing stably expressed RIP3 (HeLa-RIP3) or mouse L929 cells. In both kinds of cells, M45 (1–292 aa) had an ability similar to that of full-length M45 to block TNF-induced necroptosis (Fig. S1B, c). This suggests that this RHIM-containing region is sufficient to block cell necrosis. Interestingly, although the viral homolog ICP6 has domain structures similar to those of M45 (Fig. S1A, left), it needs both the RHIM and R1 domains to block TNF-induced necroptosis in HT-29 cells (Fig. S1D). It has been reported that ICP6- or chimaeric M45ICP6_RHIM-induced mouse cell necroptosis is dependent on the oligomerization of the R1 domain of ICP6 or M45ICP6_RHIM [23]. Chemical (AP20187)-induced oligomerization of the tandem FKBPv domain could restore the ability of ICP6 lacking the R1 domain to induce mouse cell necroptosis [23]. Although the R1 domain is not necessary for M45 to block cell necroptosis, we wondered whether the oligomerization state of R1 contributes to the blocking ability of M45. Thus, we replaced the R1 domain of M45 with tandem FKBPV (Fig. 1a, right). We found that AP20187-induced oligomerization did not improve the blocking ability of the M45 N-terminal region (1–292 aa) (Fig. S1E). This suggests that M45 function is completely dependent on its N-terminal RHIM-containing region. To map the core region responsible for blocking necroptosis, we constructed several Myc-tagged M45 N-terminal constructs (Figs. 1a, right, and S2A). Our data showed that the M45 peptides 1–71 aa, considerably block cell necroptosis and that other M45 peptides, such as 1–90 aa and 45–162 aa, almost completely block necroptosis (Figs. 1c and S2C). Besides that, M45 may block cell necroptosis through inhibiting RIP3 activation. We found the RIP3 autophosphorylation induced by necrotic induction was blocked by these M45 truncations (Fig. S2D). Therefore, M45 N-terminal region (Gly45-Thr90) containing the RHIM core is sufficient to block RIP3 activation and cell necroptosis. To confirm the unique function of M45–RHIM, we replaced the RHIM core region of M45 (M45_52–71) with that of ICP6 (ICP6_65–83) or RIP3 (RIP3_448–468) (Figs. S1A, right, and S2B). We found that neither M45ICP6_RHIM nor M45RIP3_RHIM could block necroptosis, as observed for wild-type M45 (Fig. 1d). Consisted with that, RIP3 autophosphorylation was not blocked by these M45 chimaeras (Fig. S2E). Interestingly, these M45 chimaeras showed retarded necroptosis to a certain extent (Fig. S2F). This may be because these M45 chimaeras could also bind to RIP1/3 to interfere with necrosis signaling. All of these findings suggest that the M45–RHIM is unique and sufficient to block cell necrosis.
M45–RHIM and RIP3–RHIM form different amyloid fibrils revealed by EM and AFM analysis
Recent studies have reported that the RHIM of RIP1 and RIP3 can form functional amyloid fibrils, which is required for RIP3 activation [18, 19]. Our data suggested that M45–RHIM is sufficient to block necroptosis. We then hypothesized that M45–RHIM may differ from RIP1/3-RHIM, in that it may not form amyloid fibrils. So that it will bind and prevent RIP1/3-RHIM from forming functional amyloid fibrils. To test this hypothesis, we first synthesized RHIM core region peptides of M45 (52–71) and tested amyloid fibril formation in vitro. Negatively stained EM images of M45 and RIP3 peptides revealed that M45–RHIM can form fibrillar polymers like RIP3–RHIM (Fig. 2a). X-ray powder diffraction of the samples yielded the characteristic “cross-β” diffraction pattern, which confirmed that these are amyloid fibrils (Fig. 2b). Interestingly, the M45 fibrils in EM were morphologically different from the RIP3 fibrils. The RIP3 fibrils were single-stranded with fibrillar segments connecting together (Fig. 2a, left panel), while M45 formed bundles of fibrils with various widths (Fig. 2a, right panel). Thus, RIP3 and M45 amyloid polymers have different architectures. Further analysis of diluted fibrils by AFM revealed that the RIP3 peptides tend to form uniformly dispersed short fibrils with similar fibril heights. And the head-tail connection of fibrils can be easily detected (Fig. 2c, upper panel). On the other hand, M45 peptides form single fibrils or fibrillar bundles, and the height of the fibrils showed clear variations (Fig. 2c, lower panel). This shows the inter-filament interactions of RIP3 and M45 amyloids differ.
Mutual antagonism between RIP3–RHIM and M45–RHIM
Considering that M45–RHIM can assemble into fibrils with a unique morphology, a possible cause of M45 inhibitory function could be proposed. This kind of fibril may have a “closed-state” conformation that is detrimental to RIP1/RIP3–RHIM-dependent necrosis signal transduction. To determine whether M45–RHIM itself is inhibitory during RIP3 activation, we replaced the RIP3–RHIM core region with that of M45 or ICP6 (as a control) (Figs. S2B and S3A, left). We found that HeLa cells transfected with RIP3M45_RHIM or RIP3ICP6_RHIM remained sensitive to necroptosis (Fig. 3a). Similarly, in NIH-3T3 cells transfected with chimaeric 2FKBPV-mRIP3M45_RHIM or 2FKBPV-mRIP3ICP6_RHIM, both TNF-induced RIP1 activation and AP20187-induced RIP3M45–RHIM or RIP3ICP6_RHIM assembly cause cell necroptosis (Fig. 3b). We also replaced the RIP3–RHIM core region with M45 N-terminal peptides (1–71 aa and 1–90 aa) and made several RIP3M45_1–71 and RIP3M45_1–90 chimaeric constructs (Fig. S3A, right). Similar results were obtained with those RIP3 chimaeras. Cells with either RIP3M45_1–71 or RIP3M45_1–90 expression were sensitive to necroptosis induction (Fig. S3B, C). These data suggest that M45–RHIM is functionally equivalent to RIP3–RHIM in RIP3 activation. We also tested the function of chimaeric RIP1 with the core region of M45–RHIM or ICP6-RHIM (Fig. 4a). We found that in RIP1 knockout HT-29 and L929 cells, the expression of wild-type RIP1 or RIP1ICP6_RHIM but not RIP1M45_RHIM could restore sensitivity to necrotic stimuli (Fig. 4b, c). These data indicate that the M45–RHIM core region could replace RIP3–RHIM but not RIP1-RHIM during necroptosis signaling. We then tested whether M45–RHIM blocked RIP1 kinase activation when embedded in RIP1. We used the RIP1 phosphor antibody (pS161) to measure RIP1 kinase autophosphorylation. We found that TNF-induced kinase activation of this chimaeric RIP1 was not affected (Fig. 4d). This suggests that RIP1M45_RHIM blocks necroptosis signal transduction downstream of RIP1 kinase activation.
The activation of either chimaeric RIP1M45_RHIM or chimaeric RIP3M45_RHIM was not affected, suggesting that M45–RHIM alone had no inhibitory effects. Therefore, RIP1M45_RHIM may block necroptosis signaling through M45–RHIM (in RIP1M45_RHIM) binding to RIP3–RHIM. To test whether M45–RIP3 binding has an inhibitory effect on RIP3 activation, we transfected M45 (1–292) or M45 (1–292)_2FKBPV into mouse NIH-3T3 cells expressing 2FKBPV-mRIP3, in which RIP1-independent cell necroptosis could be induced chemically (AP20187). We found that M45 (1–292) could efficiently block TNF-induced RIP1-dependent necroptosis but could only attenuate cell death caused by AP20187-induced RIP3 self-assembly (Figs. 3c and S3D), while M45 (1–292)_2FKBPV effectively blocked both the RIP1-dependent and RIP1-independent necroptosis pathways (Fig. 3c). The different effects of M45 (1–292) and M45 (1–292)_2FKBPV on RIP1-independent necroptosis indicated that the spontaneous binding of M45 and RIP3 is rare and that AP20187 promotes the binding of M45 and RIP3 in M45 (1–292)_2FKBPV cells to improve M45 effects on RIP3. These data showed that M45 could directly block RIP3 self-assembly-induced cell necrosis when it binds to RIP3 and suggested that RIP1 may function to help M45 bind to RIP3 in the RIP1-containing complex. To confirm the cooperative ability of M45–RHIM and RIP3–RHIM to block necroptosis, we exchanged the RHIM between RIP3 and M45 and found that chimaeric M45RIP3_RHIM barely blocked necroptosis in wild-type RIP3-expressing cells but efficiently blocked necroptosis in RIP3M45_RHIM-expressing cells (Fig. S3E, F). Interestingly, although either wild-type RIP3 or chimaeric RIP3M45_RHIM alone could mediate necroptosis, these components interfere with each other in response to necroptosis induction when transiently expressed in HeLa or NIH-3T3 cells (Fig. 3d, e). These experiments reinforce the idea that the mutual antagonism between RIP3–RHIM and M45–RHIM in necroptosis regulation.
M45–RHIM prevents RIP3 fibrils from self-assembling into cellular puncta
Extensive studies have previously established that self-assembly of RHIMs is responsible for RIP1-RIP3 necrosome formation [18, 19, 32, 33]. When necroptosis was induced by TNF, RIP1 was activated, and RIP3 was then recruited to form the necrosome. This could be revealed by monitoring necroptosis signal-dependent enhancement of RIP1-RIP3 binding. This necroptosis-specific assembly of RIP1-RIP3 is regarded as the critical step of RIP3 necrosome initiation [5, 28]. Our data show that M45–RHIM can functionally replace RIP3–RHIM to induce cell necrosis, but it can block cell necrosis when heterologously expressed. This finding impelled us to check whether M45 could affect RHIM-dependent RIP1-RIP3 binding during necroptosis signaling. We found that although RIP3 kinase autophosphorylation (RIP3 band shift) was blocked by M45 (1–292) expression, the necroptosis induction triggered by RIP1-RIP3 binding was not affected (Fig. 5a). We also tested M45–RIP1 and M45–RIP3 binding by precipitation of Myc-tagged M45 (1–292). We found that the binding of both M45–RIP1 and M45–RIP3 was weak in untreated cells but enhanced upon necroptosis induction (Fig. 5a). This result indicates that the activated RIP1 induced by TNF will recruit both RIP3 and M45 to the necrosome and promote more M45–RIP3 binding. This could explain why M45 functions less efficiently in the RIP1-independent necroptosis pathway (Fig. 3c). Thus, in the TNF-induced necroptosis pathway, M45 does not suppress RIP1-RIP3 necrosome initiation but invades this necrosis signaling complex. We next checked whether M45 played a role in the steps of RIP3 necrosome maturation, during which RIP3 self-assembly was observed as puncta in necrotic cells [28]. The RIP3 puncta could be stained by the classical amyloid fibril dye ThT, suggesting that the RIP3 puncta were composed of RIP3 amyloids [18]. As expected, discrete puncta of RIP3 were detected in control cells transfected with empty vector. However, in M45 (1–292)-expressing cells, RIP3 remained uniformly diffuse throughout the cytosol upon necroptosis induction (Fig. 5b). This suggests that although M45 does not prevent RIP1-RIP3 binding in necrosomes, it can block RIP3 amyloids from forming cellular puncta.
M45 block RIP3 activation through forming M45–RIP3 heteroamyloid
The cellular RIP3 puncta are large protein clusters of RIP3 amyloids. So that M45–RHIM will block RIP3 puncta assembly before or after RIP3–RHIM amyloid formation. We first tested whether M45 prevents RIP3–RHIM from forming amyloid fibrils in vitro. We mixed denatured M45 and RIP3 peptides and then diluted them in ThT binding buffer to measure fibrillar polymerization during refolding. Compared with RIP3 or M45 peptides alone, we found that the ThT fluorescence increase of the M45–RIP3 peptide mixture was faster, and the fluorescence intensity was also much stronger (Fig. 5c). This suggests that RIP3–RHIM and M45–RHIM may prefer to form heteroamyloid fibrils when mixed together. Interestingly, we found that RIP3–M45 hetero-fibrils formed clusters that were morphologically distinct from RIP3 fibrils in EM (Fig. 5d). In addition, AFM of diluted RIP3–M45 hetero-fibrils showed differences from RIP3 or M45 homo-fibrils. Unlike pure RIP3 fibrils, the head-tail interactions could rarely be detected in AFM of RIP3–M45 hetero-fibrils, and the RIP3–M45 heteroamyloid cluster consisted of a parallel arrangement of single fibrils with similar heights, unlike the fibrillar bundles with various heights of pure M45 fibrils (Figs. 2c and 5e). These results suggest that the free M45–RHIM peptides do not block RIP3 fibrillar polymerization in vitro but form M45–RIP3 hetero-fibrils, which may change the inter-filament architecture compared with pure RIP3 or M45 homo-fibrils. We then wanted to determine whether M45 homo- or M45–RIP3 hetero-fibrils inhibit RIP3–RHIM fibrillar polymerization. The ThT fluorescence increase of RIP3 peptides was measured when seeds of RIP3, M45, or M45–RIP3 amyloid polymer were present. These results show that the RIP3, M45, or M45–RIP3 amyloids could serve as nuclei to accelerate RIP3–RHIM formation of a homo-amyloid oligomer (Fig. S4A). It indicates that M45 amyloids did not inhibit but instead promoted RIP3–RHIM amyloid formation in vitro. Interestingly, the RIP3 amyloids could further assemble into large amyloid polymers in vitro, which were deformed in M45–RIP3 heteroamyloids (Fig. S4B). The in vitro data suggest that M45 does not affect RIP3 amyloid formation. We then tested whether M45 could affect RIP3 amyloids formation in cells. Most of amyloids are insoluble protein aggregates which are enriched in cell lysis pellet after high-speed centrifugation. Therefore, cellular RIP3 fibril formation could be detected by measuring RIP3 translocation to cell pellets upon necroptosis induction. We found that when necroptosis is induced, both RIP3 and M45 can translocate to this amyloid-enriched pellet fraction (Fig. 5f). This means that necroptosis stimuli could induce both RIP3 and M45 to form amyloids in cells. Thus, RIP3 puncta formation is blocked by M45 after RIP3 forms fibrils. The RIP3/M45 in pellet fraction are resistant to urea. It confirmed they form amyloids (Fig. S4C). We have shown that M45 could block RIP3 autophosphorylation (Fig. S2D). It means that RIP3 amyloid formation is required but not sufficient for kinase activation. Interestingly, previous studies showed that the kinase dead form of RIP3 could not form puncta upon necrosis induction [5]. It may be caused by the inactive kinase domain leading a close state conformation that mask RIP3–RHIM. So that if M45 could directly inhibit RIP3 kinase activity, it could block RIP3 puncta formation indirectly. By in vitro kinase assay, we confirmed that M45–RHIM could not directly inhibit RIP3 kinase activity (Fig. S4D). Therefore, M45 could block RIP3 puncta formation through directly interfering RIP3–RHIM amyloids further assembly, which was required for RIP3 kinase activation.
RIP3 mutations impairing the inter-filament interactions disrupted necroptosis
Our data suggested that RIP3 activation requires free RIP3 proteins to form amyloid fibrils and then self-assemble (properly through head-tail connections) into large fibrillar networks (RIP3 puncta). The latter step could be blocked by M45–RHIM amyloid incorporation. So that RIP3–RHIM took charge of not only amyloid formation but also inter-filament assembly. The region from N451 to D462 of RIP3 containing the four conserved residues (VQVG) was responsible for amyloid formation revealed by the RIP1/3 amyloid structure (PDB code 5V7Z) (Fig. 6a, indicated by dark blue bracket). We then suspected amino acids outside of this region may be responsible for inter-filament assembly and were critical for RIP3 mediated cell necroptosis. To identify the critical amino acid residues in RHIM core of RIP3, several RIP3 mutants have been tested. We found alanine mutations of eight residues L449, N451, Y453, N464, Y465, L466, T467, and M468 totally blocked necroptosis, while alanine mutations of six residues L449, N451, Y453, Y465, L466, and T467 only partially blocked necroptosis (Fig. S5A, B). It suggested that N464 and M468 of RIP3 were important in necroptosis signaling. We then mutated N464 and M468 to alanine or aspartic acid, and found that the N464A/M468A mutant was still functional to mediate cell necroptosis (Fig. S5C). But double mutation of N464 and M468 to aspartic acid (N464D/M468D) blocked cell necroptosis induced by TNF or IFN (Figs. 6b and S5D). Moreover, the necrosis signal could not induce activation of mutant RIP3, but the translocation of RIP3 to amyloid-enriched pellet fraction was not affected (Figs. S5E and 6c). It suggested that these mutations of RIP3 did not affect amyloids formation upon necrosis induction. Indeed, we found that RIP3N464D/M468D mutant proteins could form amyloid fibrils in vitro, morphologically similar with wild-type RIP3 in EM (Fig. 6d). While in AFM, mutant RIP3 formed uniformly dispersed short fibrils, which were comparable to wild-type RIP3 fibrils (Fig. S5F). As in AFM of RIP3–M45 hetero-fibrils, the head-tail interactions of mutant RIP3 fibrils were rarely seen, suggesting that the mutant RIP3 reduced the proper ordered inter-filament interactions. Consisted with that, in vitro assembly assay showed a lot of wild-type RIP3 form ultra-large amyloid fibers in stacking gel, but only a few mutant RIP3 (N464D/M468D) signal was in there (Fig. 6e). It indicated the deficiency of mutant RIP3 to assemble into large amyloid polymer. We also compared necroptotic signal-induced self-assembly of wild-type and mutant RIP3 in cells, using chemical crosslinker disuccinimidyl glutarate. It showed that comparing with wild-type RIP3, the signal of assembled mutant RIP3 was reduced (Fig. S5G). All of the above suggested the mutation of N464/M468 to aspartic acid in RIP3 block necroptosis through interfering ordered inter-filament assembly of RIP3. Besides the human RIP3 mutant, a mouse RIP3 mutant (L456D) with the mutation site away from the tetrad core sequence of RHIM was also identified. The mutation blocked TNF- or IFN-induced RIP3 activation and cell necroptosis (Fig. S6A, B), which may also be due to interfere ordered inter-filament assembly. These data confirmed the importance of inter-filament mediated self-assemble of RIP3 in necroptosis signaling. Altogether, our data suggested a working model of RIP3 activation and M45 function (Fig. S6C). The amyloid fibril architectures of RIP3–RHIM and M45–RHIM differ. These two types of amyloid fibrils alone can further assemble to form a functional high-order amyloid network through ordered inter-filament interactions (Fig. S6C, a and c). It leads to RIP3 activation and cell necroptosis. Mutations impairing inter-filament interaction prevent RIP3 amyloids further assembly (Fig. S6C, a). However, when different types of RHIM are in the same cells, they will form neutralized hetero-fibrils to prevent higher-order amyloid network formation (Fig. S6C, b).
Discussion
The RHIM of RIP1/3 can form A-beta-like amyloid fibrils in vitro and amyloid fibril formation is required for necroptosis signaling [5–7, 19]. Our data showed that RHIM-mediated amyloid formation of RIP3 and M45 is induced by an upstream necrosis signal, although RIP3 kinase activation and cell necrosis are blocked by M45 (Fig. 5f). Therefore, RIP3 amyloid formation is not sufficient for RIP3 activation. And we found that M45 blocks RIP3 function at the step of RIP3 amyloid fibril further assembly into cellular puncta. Previous studies found that the RHIM of RIP1, RIP3 or their hetero mixture could form amyloid fibrils with similar morphology by EM [18, 19]. However, compared to the RIP3 homo-RHIM fibrils, a significant change in the morphology of M45 homo- or M45–RIP3 hetero-fibrils was detected by EM in our study (Figs. 2a and 5d) [34]. Our AFM results suggest that the morphological differences may be caused by the distinct inter-filament interactions in RIP3, M45, and M45–RIP3 amyloids (Figs. 2c and 5e). This suggests that M45 prevents RIP3 fibrils from forming an amyloid network by disrupting ordered inter-filament interactions. Clearly, the core of the model is that M45–RHIM has a structure that is different from that of RIP3–RHIM. Although our EM and AFM data showed the different packing forms of RIP3 or M45 homo-fibrils and RIP3–M45 hetero-fibrils (Figs. 2a, c and 5d, e), further structural analysis to compare the M45 and RIP3 inter-filament architectures is still indispensable to reveal the detailed molecular mechanism by which M45 blocks RIP3 activation through hetero-RHIM-RHIM interactions. Furthermore, judging from their crystal structures, the architectures of the four conserved residues in the RHIM of RIP1 and RIP3 (IQIG of human RIP1 and VQVG of human RIP3) are almost the same [18, 19]. M45 has the same four conserved residues (IQIG) as RIP1 (Fig. S2B). Thus, the difference between the inter-filament architectures of M45–RHIM and RIP3–RHIM depends on another region of the RHIM, which is confirmed by our RIP3 mutant N464D/M468D. In addition to the M45–RIP3 hetero-RHIM polymer, a previous report also showed that the fibril morphology of the M45–RIP1 or M45–DAI RHIM mixture was different from that of the RIP1 or DAI homo-RHIM polymer by EM [34]. This suggests that M45 may also affect the inter-filament interactions of RIP1 or DAI. However, there is no evidence to suggest that RIP1 or DAI function requires inter-filament assembly of their RHIM amyloids. It will be interesting to analyze whether M45 can directly affect RIP1 or DAI function in subsequent studies, which may indicate whether the ordered inter-filament combination needed to form a network is generally required for the function of all RHIM-dependent amyloid proteins. It has been reported that the folding of RIP1/3-RHIM amyloid is structurally similar to that of the classical Aβ [19]. Plaque depositions of Aβ and other pathologic amyloids have been used as established biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease, although the pathological roles of these amyloids are not fully understood. Our studies of RIP3/M45–RHIM function imply that the ordered inter-filament interactions of pathologic amyloids may contribute to amyloid deposition and disease progression, which may be a new therapeutic target for disease treatment.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the Pengyu Huang Laboratory (pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-copGFP) and the Liming Sun Laboratory (PX330) for the vectors. We thank the support from Analytical Instrumentation Center (contract No. SPST-AIC10112914), SPST, ShanghaiTech University and Dr. Xin-yan Wang and Na Yu at the Analytical Instrumentation Center of the school of Physical Science and Technology at ShanghaiTech University for the assistance in the AFM and XRD experiments. We thank Dr. Hou-chao Tao for the aid in the HPLC instrument. We thank Dr. Qian-qian Sun and Dr. Dan-dan Liu from the facility of School of Life Science, Shanghaitech University for the assistance on TEM. This work is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31770790 to JL and 31571427 to HW) and the scientific research start-up of HW from the School of Life Science.
Author contributions
HH and HW conceived and designed the experiments; HH and XW performed and analyzed most of the experiments; GW, NN, and JZ contributed to the performance of experiments; XZ, YZ, ZS, JL, and XL generated essential tools and reagents for the study; HH, XW, and HW drafted the paper; HH, JL, and HW discussed the results and edited the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by: H. Zhang
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Hong Hu, Xialian Wu
Contributor Information
Junxia Lu, Email: lujx@shanghaitech.edu.cn.
Huayi Wang, Email: wanghuayi@shanghaitech.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41418-020-0598-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Linkermann A, Green DR. Necroptosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:455–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1310050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pasparakis M, Vandenabeele P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature. 2015;517:311. doi: 10.1038/nature14191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Silke J, Rickard JA, Gerlic M. Erratum: the diverse role of RIP kinases in necroptosis and inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:889. doi: 10.1038/ni0815-889b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shan B, Pan H, Najafov A, Yuan J. Necroptosis in development and diseases. Genes Dev. 2018;32:327–40. doi: 10.1101/gad.312561.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.He S, Wang L, Miao L, Wang T, Du F, Zhao L, et al. Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-alpha. Cell. 2009;137:1100–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang DW, Shao J, Lin J, Zhang N, Lu BJ, Lin SC, et al. RIP3, an energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis. Science. 2009;325:332–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1172308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cho YS, Challa S, Moquin D, Genga R, Ray TD, Guildford M, et al. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell. 2009;137:1112–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.He S, Wang X. RIP kinases as modulators of inflammation and immunity. Nat Immunol. 2018;19:912–22. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sun L, Wang X. A new kind of cell suicide: mechanisms and functions of programmed necrosis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39:587–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, Sanjo H, et al. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science. 2003;301:640. doi: 10.1126/science.1087262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takaoka A, Wang Z, Choi MK, Yanai H, Negishi H, Ban T, et al. DAI (DLM-1/ZBP1) is a cytosolic DNA sensor and an activator of innate immune response. Nature. 2007;448:501. doi: 10.1038/nature06013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.He S, Liang Y, Shao F, Wang X. Toll-like receptors activate programmed necrosis in macrophages through a receptor-interacting kinase-3-mediated pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:20054–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116302108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thapa RJ, Ingram JP, Ragan KB, Nogusa S, Boyd DF, Benitez AA, et al. DAI senses influenza A virus genomic RNA and activates RIPK3-dependent cell death. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:674–81. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dillon CP, Maelfait J, Liverpool L, Bridgeman A, Ragan KB, Upton JW, Rehwinkel J. Sensing of viral and endogenous RNA by ZBP1/DAI induces necroptosis. EMBO J. 2017;36:e201796476. doi: 10.15252/embj.201796476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dillon CP, Weinlich R, Rodriguez DA, Cripps JG, Quarato G, Gurung P, et al. RIPK1 blocks early postnatal lethality mediated by caspase-8 and RIPK3. Cell. 2014;157:1189–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kaiser WJ, Daley-Bauer LP, Thapa RJ, Mandal P, Berger SB, Huang CZ, et al. RIP1 suppresses innate immune necrotic as well as apoptotic cell death during mammalian parturition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:7753–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401857111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rickard JA, O’Donnell JA, Evans JM, Lalaoui N, Poh AR, Rogers T, et al. RIPK1 regulates RIPK3-MLKL-driven systemic inflammation and emergency hematopoiesis. Cell. 2014;157:1175–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li J, McQuade T, Siemer AB, Napetschnig J, Moriwaki K, Hsiao YS, et al. The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell. 2012;150:339–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mompean M, Li W, Li J, Laage S, Siemer AB, Bozkurt G, et al. The structure of the necrosome RIPK1-RIPK3 core, a human hetero-amyloid signaling complex. Cell. 2018;173:1244–53.e1210. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vanden Berghe T, Hassannia B, Vandenabeele P. An outline of necrosome triggers. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:2137–52. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2189-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baker MODG, Shanmugam N, Pham CLL, Strange M, Steain M, Sunde M. RHIM-based protein:protein interactions in microbial defence against programmed cell death by necroptosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;99:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Upton JW, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES. Virus inhibition of RIP3-dependent necrosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7:302–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang Z, Wu SQ, Liang Y, Zhou X, Chen W, Li L, et al. RIP1/RIP3 binding to HSV-1 ICP6 initiates necroptosis to restrict virus propagation in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:229–42. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang X, Li Y, Liu S, Yu X, Li L, Shi C, et al. Direct activation of RIP3/MLKL-dependent necrosis by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) protein ICP6 triggers host antiviral defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:15438–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412767111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guo HY, Omoto S, Harris PA, Finger JN, Bertin J, Gough PJ, et al. Herpes simplex virus suppresses necroptosis in human cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:243–51. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yu X, Li Y, Chen Q, Su C, Zhang Z, Yang C, et al. Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 mediate species-specific modulations of programmed necrosis through the viral ribonucleotide reductase large subunit R1. J Virol. 2016;90:1088–95. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02446-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lembo D, Brune W. Tinkering with a viral ribonucleotide reductase. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun L, Wang H, Wang Z, He S, Chen S, Liao D, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. 2012;148:213–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brune W, Menard C, Heesemann J, Koszinowski UH. A ribonucleotide reductase homolog of cytomegalovirus and endothelial cell tropism. Science. 2001;291:303–5. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5502.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Upton JW, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES. Cytomegalovirus m45 cell death suppression requires receptor-interacting protein (RIP) homotypic interaction motif (RHIM)-dependent interaction with RIP1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:16966–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800051200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Upton Jason W, Kaiser William J, Mocarski Edward S. DAI/ZBP1/DLM-1 complexes with RIP3 to mediate virus-induced programmed necrosis that is targeted by murine cytomegalovirus vIRA. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:290–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu XN, Yang ZH, Wang XK, Zhang Y, Wan H, Song Y, et al. Distinct roles of RIP1-RIP3 hetero- and RIP3-RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:1709–20. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Orozco S, Yatim N, Werner MR, Tran H, Gunja SY, Tait SWG, et al. RIPK1 both positively and negatively regulates RIPK3 oligomerization and necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:1511–21. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pham CL, Shanmugam N, Strange M, O’Carroll A, Brown JW, Sierecki E, et al. Viral M45 and necroptosis‐associated proteins form heteromeric amyloid assemblies. EMBO Rep. 2019;20:e46518. doi: 10.15252/embr.201846518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.