Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Sep 24;49(2):858–870. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02608-8

Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation Reduces Neurodegenerative Process in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma

Assraa Hassan Jassim 1,*, McKay Cavanaugh 2,*, Jessica Stukel Shah 2, Rebecca Willits 2,#, Denise M Inman 1,#
PMCID: PMC7854493  NIHMSID: NIHMS1632384  PMID: 32974756

Abstract

Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease in which the retinal ganglion cell axons of the optic nerve degenerate concomitant with synaptic changes in the retina, leading finally to death of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Electrical stimulation has been used to improve neural regeneration in a variety of systems, including in diseases of the retina. Therefore, the focus of this study was to investigate whether transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) in the DBA2/J mouse model of glaucoma could improve retinal or optic nerve pathology and serve as a minimally invasive treatment option. Mice (10 months-old) received 21 sessions of TES over 8 weeks, after which we evaluated RGC number, axon number, and anterograde axonal transport using histology and immunohistochemistry. To gain insight into the mechanism of proposed protection, we also evaluated inflammation by quantifying CD3+ T-cells and Iba1+ microglia; perturbations in metabolism were shown via the ratio pAMPK to AMPK, and changes in trophic support were tested using protein capillary electrophoresis. We found that TES resulted in RGC axon protection, a reduction in inflammatory cells and their activation, improved energy homeostasis, and a reduction of the cell death-associated p75NTR. Collectively, the data indicated that TES maintained axons, decreased inflammation, and increased trophic factor support, in the form of receptor presence and energy homeostasis, suggesting that electrical stimulation impacts several facets of the neurodegenerative process in glaucoma.

Keywords: Glaucoma, transcorneal electrical stimulation, BDNF, p75NTR, optic nerve, retina

Introduction

Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy that encompasses a group of neurodegenerative diseases, ultimately resulting in irreversible blindness due to retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dysfunction and degeneration. The pathophysiology of glaucoma, especially the window of time between initial changes in the retinogeniculate pathway and overt retinal ganglion cell loss, offers an opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Currently, there is no cure for glaucoma and all therapies target lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP), an important risk factor yet not causative for the disease.41 Given that patients with glaucoma may have to manage their disease for up to 50 years, direct benefit would come from therapies that are longitudinal and non-invasive. In glaucoma, the breakdown of visual function occurs at the bipolar to RGC synapse;37 the RGC to magno- and parvo-cellular cell synapses in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN);20 and synaptic changes in the superior colliculus, the major retino-recipient region for rodents. In addition to synaptic loss, RGC axons degenerate within the optic nerve.39 Treatment strategies, including electrical stimulation, may contribute to slowing disease progression.

Current glaucoma therapies target reduction in IOP; however, none have been proven to restore vision. The use of electrical stimulation has been shown to have a neuroprotective effect in multiple tissue types and has been used as a minimally invasive treatment option for several diseases. These treatments have been explored to yield functional improvement in humans. Patients with non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy showed preserved visual acuity thresholds 3 months after a single transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) treatment.15 Similarly, 30 min of TES improved visual acuity in some eyes and increased focal electroretinogram output one month after treatment in patients with branch retinal artery occlusion.36 In a clinical trial, transorbital stimulation was used for 50 minutes a day for ten days in patients with optic neuropathies, including glaucoma. After stimulation, a transient increase in visual fields and decrease in reaction time was found, however there was no improvement in visual acuity.16 While not all patients benefit from electrical stimulation treatment, incrementally better vision after stimulation should not be dismissed— non-invasive techniques that can improve vision for patients by any degree can have a major impact on quality of life. To increase the efficacy of TES, a greater understanding of the mechanism of neuroprotection must be established.

Similar to human studies, TES in rodent models has shown efficacy for various diseases of the eye, yet the mechanism of action remains unclear. Several studies point to changes in pathology that could influence glaucoma trajectories. For example, morphological changes, such as photoreceptor survival and preservation of retinal function, were seen in rats with retinitis pigmentosa after TES.32 Increased trophic support or reduction in microglial activation was also found following TES in rats.33, 35, 47 These studies demonstrated a positive effect on visual function following TES and hint at potential mechanisms of action. However, efficacy following TES in models of glaucoma are needed to further explore potential mechanisms of any improvement.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the use of TES to treat glaucoma pathology in a rodent model. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of TES in treating retinal and axonal degeneration that underlies vision loss during glaucoma. The DBA2/J mouse model was subjected to 8 weeks of TES. The effect of stimulation on the visual system was evaluated by examining RGC survival, the integrity of the optic nerve and perturbations in inflammation, metabolism, and trophic support that occurred throughout the system. Our results indicated that TES is a minimally invasive treatment option to target aspects of glaucoma pathology.

Methods

Materials

Beuthanasia-D (07-807-3963, Merck Animal Health, Madison, NJ), phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (BP3994, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), paraformaldehyde (PFA) (BP531 Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), methylcellulose eye drop solution (Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland), Fluoromount-G (0100, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL). FluoroGold (hydroxystilbamidine; FG; 22845, by Invitrogen through ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), Araldite 502/ Polybed 812 kit (08791; Polysciences, Inc, Warrington, PA, USA), T-PER buffer (78510, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), HALT protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (78442, by Pierce, through ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay Kit (BCA, by Pierce through ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), cholera toxin B subunit (CTB conjugated to AlexaFluor-488; C22841, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), donkey serum (DKS) 017-000-121, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA)

Antibodies: C-fos (sc-166940, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); RBPMS (GTX118619, Genetex, Irvine, CA); Iba1 (NC9288364, by Wako through Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA); CD3 (MAB4841, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); β-actin (ab8227 Abcam, Boston, MA); p75 (sc-271708, SantaCruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); TrkB (sc-377218, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); pTrkB (ABN1381, Millipore-Sigma, St. Louis, MO); brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, sc-65514, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); AMP kinase and phosphorylated AMP kinase (AMPK, NBP2–22127, and pAMPK NBP1–74502, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO). Secondary antibodies were appropriate Alexa-Fluor conjugates from Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). DAPI (D1306, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).

Animals

All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and performed in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The glaucoma model for the study was the DBA/2J (D2) mouse strain. The D2 mouse develops an iris pigment dispersion disease that leads to increased IOP and eventual loss of RGCs.27 All mice were originally obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and housed in an animal care facility with a 12-hour light/dark schedule, ambient air temperature of 69–79°F and 30–70% humidity. All mice had free access to standard laboratory rodent food and water. Both males and females were used. Mice were divided into three groups: 1) Control Non-stimulated D2, (n=25); 2) Stimulated D2, (n=18); and 3) Control D2, (n=8). One control group was matched for age (Control Non-stimulated) and the other for strain; Control D2 were 3 to 5 months (m) of age. These ages were chosen because the onset of glaucoma-associated pathology occurs between the ages of 8–9 months in the D2 mouse; therefore, the use of a 10-month-old animal represented the disease phenotype. The 3 to 5-month-old D2 control group represented the pre-disease phenotype.

Figure 1 shows the overall experimental design. Animals were divided into 2 groups (experimental and control) with statistically equivalent IOP measurements. The experiment was conducted over the course of 8 weeks, after which animals were further randomly divided into various endpoint evaluations. A separate subset of mice (n=4) were examined for c-fos, an intermediate early gene upregulated in response to stimulation, to confirm activation in the brain due to TES.43 Some mice (23 mice with each eye measured, n = 46) were examined for retrograde labeling from the superior colliculus to the eye and another subset of mice (16 mice with each eye measured, n = 32) were examined for anterograde transport from the eye to the superior colliculus. All mice (n = 51) were sacrificed approximately 3 days after the final stimulation with an overdose of Beuthanasia-D and transcardially perfused with 0.1M PBS followed by 4% PFA except as noted below. Brain, optic nerve, and eyes were collected for cellular and protein analysis.

Figure 1. Experimental Design.

Figure 1.

Baseline IOP was established in mice and used to divide animals into experimental and control groups. Stimulation was administered to experimental mice every three days for 8 weeks; control mice received no treatment. At the end of 8 weeks, final IOP measures were taken and CTB was intravitreally injected 2–3 days prior to sacrifice. After sacrifice, retina, optic nerve (ON) and superior colliculus (SC) were collected for analysis of retinal ganglion cell soma and axon survival. A separate group of mice were used for c-fos analysis.

IOP Measurements

IOP measurements, measured in mmHg, were taken for both eyes in all mice before stimulation (0 weeks) as a baseline, to assure statistical equivalence for group distribution, and after stimulation at the final time point (8 weeks). Mice were lightly anesthetized using 2.5% isoflurane and a total of 10 measurements per eye were taken using a TonoLab rebound tonometer (iCare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland). The 10 IOP measures were taken at approximately the same time each measurement day then averaged together for each eye.

Stimulation Paradigm

TES was applied to both mouse eyes in the Stimulated 12m D2 group for 10 minutes every three days for 8 weeks. Contact lens electrodes were made according to the protocol described;40 briefly, lenses was cut from ACLAR embedding film (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) to be approximately 3mm in diameter. A 10cm piece of silver-coated 22/1-denier nylon fiber (Statex Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH, Bremen, Germany) was threaded on the inner side of the contact lens. Animals were then anesthetized using 2.5–3% isoflurane and placed on a heating pad for the duration of stimulation. The contact was placed on the eye of the animal with approximately 10μl of methylcellulose eye drop solution to ensure constant contact with the eye.

Each eye was stimulated separately with a ground wire placed in the back of the neck. A Master 8 power supply (World Precision Instruments) and isolator (World Precision Instruments) were used to apply TES, consisting of a symmetric biphasic square wave at a current of 100 μA, 1 ms pulse duration, at a frequency of 20 Hz, for 10 minutes. After 10 minutes, the electrode was moved the other eye and TES was applied. Contacts were cleaned with ethanol and DI water following stimulation of each mouse. During this time, Control 12m D2 and Control 5m D2 mice received no stimulation.

Analysis of c-fos Activation

Labeling for the immediate early gene c-fos occurs in the nucleus and is optimally observed 90 minutes post-stimulation of the retina. A separate group of experimental D2 mice (n = 4) were used to evaluate the activation of c-fos. A positive control (n = 1) was generated by creating osmotic thirst via an intraperitoneal injection of 4% saline solution. A negative control (n=1) was a D2 mouse without stimulation. Mice were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane and stimulation was applied as described in the above protocol. Mice were sacrificed 90min post stimulation and transcardially perfused with 0.1M PBS then 4% PFA. Brains were collected and post-fixed overnight in 4% PFA. Brains were sectioned at 50μm on a Leica freezing microtome (Wetzlar, Germany) and stored in PBS-sodium/azide for immunohistochemical analysis. The tissue was washed then blocked in 5% donkey serum (DKS) and 1% Triton X-100 in PBS-sodium azide followed by 48h of incubation at 4°C in c-fos primary antibody diluted (1:800) in 3% DKS and 1% Triton X-100 in PBS-sodium azide. After washing in PBS-azide, sections were incubated in secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 diluted (1:300) in 1% DKS and 1% Triton X-100 in PBS-sodium azide overnight at room temperature. After a final wash, six representative sections were mounted on SuperFrost slides and coverslipped with Fluoromount-G. Sections were imaged with a Leica confocal DMi8 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). The negative control was imaged to establish background fluorescent intensity settings, then the positive control and c-fos stained samples were imaged to view c-fos activation based on the negative control settings. The positive control was used as a reference for c-fos activation. Images for presentation were taken on an Observer Z1 inverted microscope (Zeiss Microscopy, White Plains, NY).

Retrograde RGC Labeling and Quantification

FluoroGold (FG) was used to retrogradely label RGCs in a subset of control and experimental study mice. Five days prior to sacrifice, mice (n = 23) were anesthetized using 3% isoflurane and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. Using coordinates (−4.4 mm posterior to Bregma, ±0.5mm lateral, and 0.5 mm below skull surface), 1.5μl of 3% FG in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide/PBS was injected bilaterally into each superior colliculus (SC). Five days after intracranial injections, mice were euthanized as described above. Eyes were dissected out and allowed to postfix in PFA for 1 hour before being stored in 30% sucrose in 0.1M PBS. Retinas were dissected out, relief cuts made, then mounted onto glass slides, and coverslipped. Whole mount images were obtained by stitching together z-stacked tiles of the retina at 160x magnification on a Zeiss AxioZoom fluorescent microscope. FG labelled RGCs were quantified using ImagePro (Media Cybernetics, Inc; Rockville, MD) after processing the images through 2-D filters to sort fluorescently labelled cells of a certain size and shape and also eliminate any artifacts13. ImagePro was also used to calculate retinal areas. The total number of cells was then divided by the area of the retina to give a measure of RGC density.

Analysis of Anterograde Transport

Three days prior to sacrifice, mice from the experimental and control groups were anesthetized using 2.5% isoflurane and received an intraocular injection of 1.5μL CTB conjugated to Alexa Fluor-488. CTB is taken up by the RGCs and transported via endocytic vesicles to the superior colliculus (SC).13 SC was harvested for analysis after mice were sacrificed and perfused. Retinas were dissected out and mounted onto glass slides then coverslipped. The whole mount retinas were checked to ensure proper administration of the CTB injection and uptake by the RGCs. The SC was coronally sectioned at 50μm on a Leica freezing microtome (Wetzlar, Germany). Representative sections (choosing every third section from the sectioned tissue, up to 10 total) were mounted and imaged at 40x using a Zeiss Axiozoom V16 (AxioCam MRm Rev.3; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Each side (right and left) of the SC was imaged and analyzed separately. ImageJ42 was then used to analyze the percent area fraction (PAF) of CTB labeling in each SC section via a custom macro script13 that measured the relative intensity of binned pixels in a defined area of interest with the background fluorescence subtracted. The intensity values were summed then normalized by the number of bins to obtain the PAF for the right and left SC of each animal.

Optic Nerve Histology

Distal portions of optic nerves (ONs), 50% of the myelinated optic nerve that is roughly 2500 μm beyond the globe, were post fixed in 2% PFA and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (CB; pH 7.4) for 48 hours. Tissue was processed as previously described.11 Following fixation, ONs were stored in 0.1M cacodylate buffer until incubation in 2% osmium tetroxide on ice for 45 minutes, after which nerves went through a series of dehydration steps in ethanol and propylene oxide. Incubations in increasing concentrations of PolyBed resin mixed with propylene oxide culminated in final embedding and polymerization in PolyBed resin under vacuum before final placement in molds for hardening in a 60°C oven. Next, 500nm sections for each nerve were cut on an ultramicrotome (Leica). Sections were mounted on slides and stained with 1% ρ-phenylenediamine to visualize the axons and any degenerative debris. Imaging and quantification of the samples is detailed in the Cell and Axon Quantification section below.

Immunohistochemistry

For sectioned tissue: Globes were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in 0.1M PBS sodium azide, at minimum overnight, then embedded in OCT and sectioned at 10μm on a Leica cryostat. Sections were collected onto SuperFrost slides (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). For wholemounts: Retina, dissected from PBS-perfused animals, were fixed in 4% PFA for 15–30 minutes then kept in 0.1M PBS sodium azide until vitreous removal.

Both sectioned tissue and wholemounts were washed in 0.1M PBS then blocked for 1h at room temperature with 5% DKS and 0.4% Triton X-100 in 0.1M PBS. The tissue was then incubated in the primary antibody overnight (sectioned tissue) or 48 hours (wholemounts) at 4°C; primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution. Tissue was washed in 0.1M PBS, blocked for 30 min, then incubated in secondary antibody diluted 1:250 in blocking solution for 2 hours at room temperature. After an additional 0.1M PBS rinse, tissue was labeled with DAPI (1:2000) in tris buffered saline for 10 minutes. Slides were rinsed then coverslipped with Fluoromount-G.

Cell and Axon Quantification

RBPMS-labeled RGCs and ρ-phenylenediamine stained RGC axons were quantified using unbiased stereological analysis.29 In both cases, cell or axon quantification was performed as previously described using the optical fractionator module within StereoInvestigator (MicroBrightfield Bioscience, Williston, VT).23, 26 A 50 × 50μm or 5 × 5μm counting frame (retina or ON, respectively) was used across approximately 40 sites (10%) for both tissue types. The coefficient of error (Schmitz-Hof) was maintained at 0.05 or below, ensuring sufficient sampling rate.

Inflammation in Retina

Microglia immunolabeled with Iba1 were quantified by counting the cell bodies of Iba1+ cells that were colocalized with DAPI in the ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCL and IPL) from 6 sagittal retinal sections per animal. A minimum of 35 random regions (5 μm × 5 μm) of interest were evaluated over the inner retina for the section. The number of Iba1 positive microglia within the sampling area per retinal section was averaged per animal and expressed as Iba1+ cells per μm. CD3+ T cells were also quantified in the IPL and GCL of retina from 3 sagittal sections per retina, then averaged for each animal. T cells are expressed as CD3+ cells per retina.

Iba1 immunolabel intensity is proportional to the activation state, so measuring the labeling intensity can be a proxy for microglial activation. All images were taken using the same timing and level of exposure, then analyzed using ImageJ. The ImageJ PAF macro (see above) was applied to quantify Iba1 label intensity in the IPL of retina. One image per section was taken of 6 sagittal sections per mouse. The obtained PAFs from all sections were averaged for each animal.

Protein Quantification

Retinal and myelinated ON proteins were collected into tubes containing Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent buffer with HALT protease and phosphatase inhibitors, then disrupted with a Branson Sonifier (3-second pulse at 10% amplitude) to create a protein lysate. Total protein concentration was measured by BCA assay kit.26 AMP kinase and phosphorylated AMP kinase were analyzed by capillary tube–based electrophoresis immunoassay using the Wes, a Protein Simple instrument that separates proteins by electrical charge in capillary tubes and allows binding of primary antibody then protein visualization within the capillary.26 All other proteins were analyzed by western blot. Proteins separated by electrophoresis on denaturing polyacrylamide gels were transferred to a polyvinyl difluoride membrane. Blots were probed with antibodies against β-actin, p75, TrkB, pTrkB, and BDNF (1:1000). Appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were used, then visualized with chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Band density was measured using the lane profile analysis function in AlphaView SA version 3.4.0 software and normalized to β-actin within lane band density.26

Statistical Analysis

All results are represented as violin plots to show distribution of data and evaluated for normalcy; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical evaluation was completed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Student’s t-test was used when comparing two groups; three or more group comparisons used a oneway ANOVA followed by a general linear model (GLM). Tukey’s honestly significant difference post-hoc test was used to perform multiple comparisons among groups. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare two groups that were not normally distributed. For comparisons of three groups that did not meet the assumption for ANOVA, a Kruskal-Wallis Test was performed with a Dunn’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. Images used for results presentation are from representative samples, determined by choosing images from the third quartile of each respective analysis.

Results

Figure 1 shows the experimental design. Mice in the Stimulated group received TES for 10 min per eye every three days over 8 weeks. To determine the effectiveness of the stimulation paradigm, we first examined the activation of c-fos in the SC. Immunolabeling for c-fos was evident in the SC after 10min of 20Hz stimulation of mouse eyes through a wired contact lens (Figure 2A and B), indicating that the stimulation activated RGCs to a degree that led to downstream activation of cells in the superficial layers of the SC; Figures 2C and D show the positive control.

Figure 2. Effect of Stimulation Paradigm.

Figure 2.

A. C-fos, an immediate early gene immunolabeled (red) in a section of midbrain from a mouse stimulated using our TES paradigm (scale bar is 300μm). B. White box outlines a portion of the superior colliculus that is shown at higher magnification in the inset (scale bar is 30μm). C. Midbrain section from a mouse subjected to a hyperosmotic solution (IP) for the c-fos positive control (no stimulation; scale bar is 300μm). D. Inset shows c-fos activation at higher magnification (scale bar is 30μm). E. IOP (mmHg) was measured prior to stimulation (baseline) and after 8-weeks (final). Ten IOP measurements were taken per eye and averaged; no significant differences were found between the groups. Control 12m D2, n=22; Stimulated 12m D2, n=35.

Baseline IOP measures were used to randomize mice into their respective Control and Stimulated groups. At the end of the 8 weeks of stimulation, terminal IOP measurements were collected (Figure 2E). Both Control and Stimulated 12m D2 mice had IOP that did not differ, indicating the stimulation did not impact IOP. Although IOP elevation is one of the main risk factors of glaucoma, IOP lowering drugs can slow, but not prevent RGC degeneration. This indicates that the mechanism of degeneration goes beyond IOP elevation, so efforts to protect RGCs that do not affect IOP, as demonstrated here for TES, will be important additions to therapeutic options.

Effect of TES on RGC Survival

To observe the effect of TES on the retina and ON, we quantified RGCs, their axons, and measured anterograde axonal transport. Both the Control 12m D2 and Stimulated 12m D2 had significantly decreased RGC density compared to the healthy Control 5m D2 (Figure 3A & BD).

Figure 3. TES slows glaucoma pathology.

Figure 3.

A. RBPMS and FGpositive RGC somata in whole mount retina were quantified using unbiased stereology. There were significantly more RGCs in the Control 5m D2 (n = 19) compared to the Control 12m D2 (n = 22) and the Stimulated 12m D2 (n=18) (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001 respectively). B-D. Immunohistochemistry of RGCs (RBPMS, magenta; DAPI, blue) in whole mount retina, with representative images from each group (B. Control 5m D2; C. Control 12m D2; D. Stimulated 12m D2). Scale bars=25μm. E. Unbiased stereological axon count of stained cross-sections of ON from Control 5m D2 (n = 5), Control 12m D2 (n = 40) and Stimulated 12m D2 (n = 32) show Control 5m D2 ON had significantly more axons than both Control 12m D2 and Stimulated 12m D2 (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0288 respectively). Stimulated 12m D2 samples also showed significantly more axons compared to Control 12m D2 samples (p = 0.0074). F-H. Representative images of stained cross- sections of ON for each group (F. Control 5m D2; G. Control 12m D2; H. Stimulated 12m D2) show degenerating axons (red arrow) in Control 12m D2. Black arrows in panels for Stimulated 12m D2 and Control 5m D2 point to healthy axons. Scale bars=10μm. I. CTB transport to the SC was significantly higher in the Control 5m D2 (n = 7) compared to the Control 12m D2 (n = 27) and Stimulated 12m D2 (n = 16) (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0301 respectively). J-L. Representative images of CTB labeling (green) in coronal sections of SC show axonal transport from retina to SC of Control 12m D2 and Stimulated 12m D2 mice (J. Control 5m D2; K. Control 12m D2; L. Stimulated 12m D2). Scale bars=200μm.

While no difference was found with RGC number, TES had a positive effect on axon survival. Stimulated 12m D2 ON had significantly more axons compared to the Control 12m D2 group (Figure 3E) quantified from images (Figure 3FH) with healthy axons denoted by black arrows in the Control 5 m D2 and the Stimulated 12m D2. Axons in the Control 12m D2 group (red arrow) showed significant degeneration and gliosis, which is shown the increased size of the astrocyte somas and the larger processes between fascicles as previously detailed in D2 glaucomatous ON.7, 10

Injection of CTB into the eye prior to mouse sacrifice was used to examine anterograde axonal transport. The percent area fraction (PAF) of the SC labeled by CTB showed significant loss of axonal transport in both the Control and Stimulated 12m D2 compared to the Control 5m D2 (Figure 3I). No statistical difference in transport between Control and Stimulated 12m D2 was observed. Representative images of the SC from both Control and Stimulated 12m D2 groups, with CTB in green, are shown (Figure 3JL). Whole mount retinas from the corresponding eyes for either the Control or Stimulated 12m D2 groups were viewed to confirm complete CTB distribution across the ganglion cell layer of the retina. Thus, disruption of CTB transport from the retina to the SC can be attributed to failures in transport, not technique.

Decreased Inflammation in TES Retina

Inflammation plays a major role in glaucoma progression. Thus, to determine whether TES impacted the inflammatory response, we evaluated whether T cells had infiltrated the retina using immunolabeling for CD3 (yellow, and with white arrow, Figure 4A). CD3+ T cells were quantified in sectioned retina for the Control and Stimulated 12m D2 groups (Figure 4B). CD3+ T cells were found in significantly higher numbers in the Control 12m D2 group.

Figure 4. TES reduces inflammation.

Figure 4.

A. Sagittal sections of retina show CD3+ T cells (yellow; white arrow) in representative images of Control 12m D2 and no T cells in the Stimulated 12m D2 retina. CTB (green), Iba-1 (magenta), and DAPI (blue). B. Quantification of CD3+ T cells found in the retina of Stimulated 12m D2 (n=4) compared to the Control 12m D2 (n=4) showing a reduction in CD3+ T cells in the stimulated group (p = 0.0286). C. Microglia expressing Iba1 (magenta and white arrow) in the IPL and GCL of retina in Control 12m D2 and Stimulated 12m D2 samples. DAPI (blue). GCL= ganglion cell layer, IPL=inner plexiform layer, INL=inner nuclear layer, OPL= outer plexiform layer (OPL), and ONL=outer nuclear layer. D. Decreased inflammation shown by a significant reduction in the number of Iba1+ microglia in the IPL and GCL of Stimulated 12m D2 mice (p = 0.0467). E. Reduced inflammation also shown by a significant reduction in the percent area fraction (PAF) of Iba1+ immunolabeling in the Stimulated 12 m D2 compared to the Control 12 m D2 retina (n = 4 and n = 6 respectively; p = 0.0135).

Figure 4C shows representative sections of Iba1 immunolabeling in Control and Stimulated 12m D2 retina. We also quantified Iba1+ microglia (Figure 4D), finding a significant decrease in number for the Stimulated compared to the Control 12m D2 group. The percent area fraction (PAF) of inner retina that was labeled with Iba1+ microglia was significantly higher for Control 12m D2 mice compared to Stimulated 12m D2 mice (Figure 4E).

Restoration of Energy Homeostasis and Growth Factor Signaling

Energy homeostasis is important for proper neuronal signaling, and deficiencies in metabolism within the retina and optic nerve have been observed in the D2 model of glaucoma.23 We measured the activation (phosphorylation) of AMP-kinase (AMPK), a key metabolic regulator of ATP availability. We quantified the ratio of pAMPK to AMPK in the optic nerve (ON) and retina of Control and Stimulated 12m D2, finding that the Stimulated group had significantly lower pAMPK/AMPK ratio than the Control 12m D2 in both the ON and retina (Figure 5A and 5B).

Figure 5. TES improves energy availability and increases TrkB phosphorylation.

Figure 5.

A. A significant decrease of the pAMPK/AMPK protein ratio was found in the Stimulated 12 m D2 ON (n=6) compared to Control 12m D2 ON (n=5), p = 0.0432. B. Stimulated 12m D2 retina (n=6) has significantly lower pAMPK/AMPK ratio compared to Control 12m D2 retina (n=5), p = 0.0087. C. BDNF is significantly increased in Control 12m D2 (n = 4) and Stimulated 12m D2 (n = 4) retina compared to Control 3m D2 (n = 4) retina (p = 0.0138 and p = 0.0462). D. No significant changes were detected in TrkB protein in Stimulated 12m D2 retina (n = 5) compared to Control 12m D2 (n = 4) and 3m D2 retina (n = 4). E. pTrkB protein was increased in the Stimulated 12m D2 (n = 5) retina compared to Control 3 m D2 (n = 4) and 12 m D2 (n = 4) retina (p = 0.0058). F. The amount of p75NTR protein was significantly increased in Control 12m D2 (n = 4) retina compared to Control 3m D2 (n = 4) (p = 0.0023), but TES led to a significant decrease of p75NTR protein in the Stimulated 12m D2 (n = 5) compared to Control 12 m D2 retina (n=6; p = 0.0010). G. The ratio of pTrkB to BDNF shows no difference across the three groups.

As BDNF is vital for RGC survival, we focused on BDNF and neurotrophin receptors TrkB and p75NTR. Retinal BDNF increased with aging (Figure 5C), but there was no difference between stimulation and control. Interestingly, the amount of TrkB receptor in retina was not different across the three groups (Control 3m and Control and Stimulated 12m D2; Figure 5D). Phosphorylation of the TrkB receptor is an indication of its activity and binding of BDNF. Stimulated 12m D2 retina had significantly greater TrkB phosphorylation than the Control 3m D2 (Figure 5E). Retinal p75NTR in the Control 12m D2 was significantly greater than that of the Control 3m D2 and Stimulated 12m D2 (Figure 5F), indicating that TES reduced p75NTR in Stimulated 12m D2 to a level similar to that of the healthy Control 3m D2 (Figure 5F). Finally, we took the ratio of pTrkB to BDNF to understand how the receptor activation and BDNF levels related to each other across groups. We found that the pTrkB/BDNF ratio of the Stimulated 12m D2 retina was not different from the Control 3m D2 retina (Figure 5G), and both were higher than Control 12m D2.

Discussion

In this study, we probed the ability of TES to alter glaucoma pathological impacts on RGC and axon survival and to understand the mechanism of the changes observed. Interestingly, a protective effect of stimulation was observed in the RGC axons. Along with decreased axonal degeneration, TES treatment was able to restore energy homeostasis in the retina and optic nerve and decrease inflammation in the retina. Lastly, TES led to increased phosphorylation of TrkB and a decrease in p75NTR.

Quiescent cells produce c-fos at undetectable levels; upon stimulation, transcription of c-fos is initiated.43 The activation due to the TES was confirmed by the immunofluorescent detection of c-fos in the SC of D2 mice. The presence of c-fos in response to stimulation has long been used to map activity in the CNS, including the SC.19 The c-fos activation found with TES was modest compared to the hypothalamic positive control, suggesting that further optimization of the stimulation paradigm may be warranted. It may be possible to achieve stronger c-fos activity in the superficial layers of the SC with an optimized paradigm and should be explored in the future.

After 8 weeks of TES, the Stimulated optic nerve had less degeneration than Control. Electrical stimulation has been previously shown to increase axonal regeneration.45 For example, repetitive electrical stimulation promoted axonal outgrowth and regeneration after optic nerve crush. While these results were after trauma, they do demonstrate an axon-specific effect of electrical stimulation, which is similar to what was found here. Despite a greater number of axons in the Stimulated group, transport along RGC axons to the SC was significantly decreased in both the Stimulated and Control 12m D2 compared to Control 5m D2. The lack of increased axonal transport of CTB in the Stimulated group in spite of higher axon numbers suggests that axons may have been present and yet nonfunctional. This possibility fits within the timeframe of pathology in the D2 mouse model of glaucoma that shows loss of anterograde transport by 9 months of age.13 In our study, mice were analyzed at 12 months of age, a time well beyond measurable anterograde axon transport deficit that corresponds to significant RGC and axon loss.31

The energy-demanding RGCs are particularly vulnerable to ATP decrease, which has been previously observed in 6 month-old D2 mice,5 prior to axon structural pathology,25 and axon transport deficit.13 Energy decrease leads to activation of AMPK, a master cellular energy sensor and metabolism regulator.18 Here, a significant increase in the ratio of activated pAMPK to inactive AMPK was detected in Control 12m D2 optic nerve and retina, indicating a lack of ATP. TES rescued ATP decrease, as reflected by the significant reduction in the ratio of pAMPK to AMPK in Stimulated 12m D2 optic nerve and retina. Modulation of metabolic pathways has been previously shown to be protective of RGCs, via expanding the energy substrate availability to RGCs in glaucoma,23 or promoting insulin signaling after axotomy.1 Interestingly, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) upregulation contributed to RGC survival after optic nerve crush and TES.33 Both insulin and IGF-1 led to the upregulation of mTOR, promoting protein synthesis and growth. While we did not evaluate IGF-1, future studies should investigate its importance given our finding that TES could promote energy homeostasis. Further investigation would be needed to determine the exact relationship between stimulation and improvement of ATP availability.

Neuroinflammation contributes to glaucoma through the activation and proliferation of microglia,24 and T cell infiltration.8 Microglia are the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, capable of responding to threats and maintaining homeostasis. Microglial activation is one of the earliest events and a critical contributor to glaucoma progression;6 quantitative correlations between microglial activation and axon loss have also been documented in D2 mice.46 Given the extent of inflammatory contribution to D2 pathology, we evaluated microglia and T cells in Control and Stimulated retina. TES reduced both Iba+ and CD3+ cells. Similar findings showed reduction in number and size of Iba1+ microglia in the cerebral cortex of rats following electrical stimulation,3 mirroring the reduction of inflammatory cells found in our study. However, the mechanism behind such inhibition remains unknown. One study suggested attenuation of microglial invasion via glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor in ischemic brains of rats,28 highlighting a possible relationship between inflammatory cells and neurotrophic factors. Future work is needed to understand if growth factors are related to the reduction of inflammatory response.

It is well established that BDNF-TrkB signaling promotes neuronal survival by activation of pro-survival pathways, and treatments that agonize the TrkB receptor are protective in glaucoma.4, 34 The BDNF-TrkB pathway has been found to have spatial and temporal changes for proper development,14, 44 with acute optic nerve injury,17, 38 and with chronic diseases such as glaucoma.21 However, the direct application of neurotrophins has its own challenges as treatment options,12, 30 and options to stimulate endogenous production may better facilitate long-term treatment. While electrical stimulation has been found to upregulate BDNF in some neurons after axotomy,2 the effect on TrkB is less clear. As with other neurotrophins, BDNF has multiple cellular receptors, including neurotrophin receptor p75NTR. p75NTR is dysregulated in glaucoma models9 and has been shown to induce neuronal apoptosis.22 Therefore, we characterized changes to BDNF and its two potential receptors, TrkB and p75NTR, after TES. The amount of BDNF was significantly increased with age, but unchanged with TES. While the total amount of TrkB was unchanged with age or stimulation, activated pTrkB was significantly higher only in Stimulated 12m D2 retina compared to the young Control. Interestingly, the amount of p75NTR was significantly decreased in the TES group compared to age matched control, and was not significantly different than the young control. Ultimately, the ratio of pTrkB to BDNF was the same in the young controls as TES stimulated animals. Taken together, these results indicated a potential pathway for support in the retina caused by TES. With these results, we hypothesize that p75NTR binding to BDNF in the Control group reduced the available BDNF for binding to TrkB, in turn reducing the phosphorylated TrkB and promoting cell death. In the Stimulated 12m D2 retina where p75NTR levels were significantly reduced, more BDNF was available to activate and phosphorylate TrkB and induce survival signaling.

In conclusion, our results indicated that TES enhanced energy homeostasis, reduced inflammation, and decreased p75NTR availability in retina of the aged animals. TES also impacted the ON, with enhanced energy homeostasis and decreased degeneration. These changes are proven elements for RGC and ON survival, suggesting that TES is a viable approach for limiting glaucomatous damage. Deepening our understanding of the underling mechanism by which TES is rescuing RGCs and modulating inflammation and metabolism will provide the framework to justify application of TES in the clinic. Optimization of the stimulation paradigm may lead to greater improvement in RGC and ON support for reduced pathology and improved function.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Amelia McMullen, Colin Waltz, and Tyree Lewis for colony support, and Josephine Lepp, Lucy Coughlin, and Ryan Zubricky for technical assistance. This work was supported by NIH EY026662 (DMI). We also thank the generous support through the Margaret F. Donovan Endowed Chair for Women in Engineering at the University of Akron.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.

References

  • 1.Agostinone J, Alarcon-Martinez L, Gamlin C, Yu WQ, Wong ROL and Di Polo A. Insulin signalling promotes dendrite and synapse regeneration and restores circuit function after axonal injury. Brain 141: 1963–1980, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Majed AA, Brushart TM and Gordon T. Electrical stimulation accelerates and increases expression of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci 12: 4381–4390, 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baba T, Kameda M, Yasuhara T, Morimoto T, Kondo A, Shingo T, Tajiri N, Wang F, Miyoshi Y, Borlongan CV, Matsumae M and Date I. Electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex exerts antiapoptotic, angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects in ischemic stroke rats through phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. Stroke 40: e598–605, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bai Y, Xu J, Brahimi F, Zhuo Y, Sarunic MV and Saragovi HU. An agonistic TrkB mAb causes sustained TrkB activation, delays RGC death, and protects the retinal structure in optic nerve axotomy and in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 4722–4731, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baltan S, Inman DM, Danilov CA, Morrison RS, Calkins DJ and Horner PJ. Metabolic vulnerability disposes retinal ganglion cell axons to dysfunction in a model of glaucomatous degeneration. J Neurosci 30: 5644–5652, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bosco A, Steele MR and Vetter ML. Early microglia activation in a mouse model of chronic glaucoma. J Comp Neurol 519: 599–620, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Buckingham BP, Inman DM, Lambert W, Oglesby E, Calkins DJ, Steele MR, Vetter ML, Marsh-Armstrong N and Horner PJ. Progressive ganglion cell degeneration precedes neuronal loss in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Neurosci 28: 2735–2744, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen H, Cho KS, Vu THK, Shen CH, Kaur M, Chen G, Mathew R, McHam ML, Fazelat A, Lashkari K, Au NPB, Tse JKY, Li Y, Yu H, Yang L, Stein-Streilein J, Ma CHE, Woolf CJ, Whary MT, Jager MJ, Fox JG, Chen J and Chen DF. Commensal microflora-induced T cell responses mediate progressive neurodegeneration in glaucoma. Nat Commun 9: 3209, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coassin M, Lambiase A, Sposato V, Micera A, Bonini S and Aloe L. Retinal p75 and bax overexpression is associated with retinal ganglion cells apoptosis in a rat model of glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246: 1743–1749, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cooper ML, Crish SD, Inman DM, Horner PJ and Calkins DJ. Early astrocyte redistribution in the optic nerve precedes axonopathy in the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma. Exp Eye Res 150: 22–33, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Coughlin L, Morrison RS, Horner PJ and Inman DM. Mitochondrial morphology differences and mitophagy deficit in murine glaucomatous optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56: 1437–1446, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daly C, Ward R, Reynolds AL, Galvin O, Collery RF and Kennedy BN. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as a Treatment Option for Retinal Degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol 1074: 465–471, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dengler-Crish CM, Smith MA, Inman DM, Wilson GN, Young JW and Crish SD. Anterograde transport blockade precedes deficits in retrograde transport in the visual projection of the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma. Front Neurosci 8: 290, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frade JM, Bovolenta P, Martínez-Morales JR, Arribas A, Barbas JA and Rodríguez-Tébar A. Control of early cell death by BDNF in the chick retina. Development 124: 3313–3320, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fujikado T, Morimoto T, Matsushita K, Shimojo H, Okawa Y and Tano Y. Effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy or traumatic optic neuropathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 50: 266–273, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gall C, Schmidt S, Schittkowski MP, Antal A, Ambrus GG, Paulus W, Dannhauer M, Michalik R, Mante A, Bola M, Lux A, Kropf S, Brandt SA and Sabel BA. Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. PLoS One 11: e0156134, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gao H, Qiao X, Hefti F, Hollyfield JG and Knusel B. Elevated mRNA expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in retinal ganglion cell layer after optic nerve injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38: 1840–1847, 1997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garcia D and Shaw RJ. AMPK: Mechanisms of Cellular Energy Sensing and Restoration of Metabolic Balance. Mol Cell 66: 789–800, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Geeraerts E, Claes M, Dekeyster E, Salinas-Navarro M, De Groef L, Van den Haute C, Scheyltjens I, Baekelandt V, Arckens L and Moons L. Optogenetic Stimulation of the Superior Colliculus Confers Retinal Neuroprotection in a Mouse Glaucoma Model. J Neurosci 39: 2313–2325, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gupta N, Ly T, Zhang Q, Kaufman PL, Weinreb RN and Yucel YH. Chronic ocular hypertension induces dendrite pathology in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the brain. Exp Eye Res 84: 176–184, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gupta V, You Y, Li J, Gupta V, Golzan M, Klistorner A, van den Buuse M and Graham S. BDNF impairment is associated with age-related changes in the inner retina and exacerbates experimental glaucoma. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842: 1567–1578, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harada C, Harada T, Nakamura K, Sakai Y, Tanaka K and Parada LF. Effect of p75NTR on the regulation of naturally occurring cell death and retinal ganglion cell number in the mouse eye. Dev Biol 290: 57–65, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harun-Or-Rashid M, Pappenhagen N, Palmer PG, Smith MA, Gevorgyan V, Wilson GN, Crish SD and Inman DM. Structural and Functional Rescue of Chronic Metabolically Stressed Optic Nerves through Respiration. J Neurosci 38: 5122–5139, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howell GR, Soto I, Zhu X, Ryan M, Macalinao DG, Sousa GL, Caddle LB, MacNicoll KH, Barbay JM, Porciatti V, Anderson MG, Smith RS, Clark AF, Libby RT and John SW. Radiation treatment inhibits monocyte entry into the optic nerve head and prevents neuronal damage in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Clin Invest 122: 1246–1261, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Inman DM, Sappington RM, Horner PJ and Calkins DJ. Quantitative correlation of optic nerve pathology with ocular pressure and corneal thickness in the DBA/2 mouse model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47: 986–996, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jassim AH and Inman DM. Evidence of Hypoxic Glial Cells in a Model of Ocular Hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 60: 1–15, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.John SWM, Smith Richard S, Savinova Olga V, Hawes Norman L, Chang Bo, Turnbull Dan, Davisson Muriel, Roderick Thomas H, and Heckenlively John R. Essential Iris Atrophy, Pigment Dispersion, and Glaucoma in DBA/2J Mice. IOVS 39: 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kameda M, Shingo T, Takahashi K, Muraoka K, Kurozumi K, Yasuhara T, Maruo T, Tsuboi T, Uozumi T, Matsui T, Miyoshi Y, Hamada H and Date I. Adult neural stem and progenitor cells modified to secrete GDNF can protect, migrate and integrate after intracerebral transplantation in rats with transient forebrain ischemia. Eur J Neurosci 26: 1462–1478, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kaplan S, Geuna S, Ronchi G, Ulkay MB and von Bartheld CS. Calibration of the stereological estimation of the number of myelinated axons in the rat sciatic nerve: a multicenter study. J Neurosci Methods 187: 90–99, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khatib TZ and Martin KR. Neuroprotection in Glaucoma: Towards Clinical Trials and Precision Medicine. Curr Eye Res 45: 327–338, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Libby RT, Anderson MG, Pang IH, Robinson ZH, Savinova OV, Cosma IM, Snow A, Wilson LA, Smith RS, Clark AF and John SW. Inherited glaucoma in DBA/2J mice: pertinent disease features for studying the neurodegeneration. Vis Neurosci 22: 637–648, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morimoto T, Fujikado T, Choi JS, Kanda H, Miyoshi T, Fukuda Y and Tano Y. Transcorneal electrical stimulation promotes the survival of photoreceptors and preserves retinal function in royal college of surgeons rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48: 4725–4732, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Morimoto T, Miyoshi T, Matsuda S, Tano Y, Fujikado T and Fukuda Y. Transcorneal electrical stimulation rescues axotomized retinal ganglion cells by activating endogenous retinal IGF-1 system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 2147–2155, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mysona BA, Zhao J and Bollinger KE. Role of BDNF/TrkB pathway in the visual system: Therapeutic implications for glaucoma. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 12: 69–81, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ni YQ, Gan DK, Xu HD, Xu GZ and Da CD. Neuroprotective effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation on light-induced photoreceptor degeneration. Exp Neurol 219: 439–452, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oono S, Kurimoto T, Kashimoto R, Tagami Y, Okamoto N and Mimura O. Transcorneal electrical stimulation improves visual function in eyes with branch retinal artery occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol 5: 397–402, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Park HY and K. a. JH Park CK. Alterations of the synapse of the inner retinal layers after chronic intraocular pressure elevation in glaucoma animal model. Molecular Brian 7: 1–10, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peinado-Ramón P, Salvador M, Villegas-Pérez MP and Vidal-Sanz M. Effects of axotomy and intraocular administration of NT-4, NT-3, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor on the survival of adult rat retinal ganglion cells. A quantitative in vivo study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37: 489–500, 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR and Green WR. Chronic Human Glaucoma Causing Selectively Greater Loss of Large Optic Nerve Fibers. Ophthalmology 95: 357–363, 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sagdullaev BT, DeMarco PJ and McCall MA. Improved contact lens electrode for corneal ERG recordings in mice. Doc Ophthalmol 108: 181–184, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sambhara D and Aref AA. Glaucoma management: relative value and place in therapy of available drug treatments. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 5: 30–43, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schneider C, Rasband WS and Eliceir KW. NIH Image to ImageJ-25 years of Image Analysis. Nat Methods 7: 671–675, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sheng M, Greenberg, Michael. The Regulation and Function of C-Fos and Other Immediate Early Genes in the Nervous System. Neuron 477–485, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Spalding KL, Rush RA and Harvey AR. Target-derived and locally derived neurotrophins support retinal ganglion cell survival in the neonatal rat retina. J Neurobiol 60: 319–327, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tagami Y, Kurimoto T, Miyoshi T, Morimoto T, Sawai H and Mimura O. Axonal regeneration induced by repetitive electrical stimulation of crushed optic nerve in adult rats. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53: 257–266, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wei X, Cho KS, Thee EF, Jager MJ and Chen DF. Neuroinflammation and microglia in glaucoma: time for a paradigm shift. J Neurosci Res 97: 70–76, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yin H, Yin H, Zhang W, Miao Q, Qin Z, Guo S, Fu Q, Ma J, Wu F, Yin J, Yang Y and Fang X. Transcorneal electrical stimulation promotes survival of retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve transection in rats accompanied by reduced microglial activation and TNF-alpha expression. Brain Res 1650: 10–20, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES