Abstract
With the increasing globalization of the food trade across countries and continents, reliable identification of the geographical origin of products is critical. In this study, we describe the limitations of the current origin labeling system for non-soil-based agricultural products and suggest alternative strategies for the identification of the geographical origin of such products. An origin identification model based on stable isotope ratio analysis combined with discriminant analysis is used to evaluate the similarities and dissimilarities between domestic and foreign shiitake mushrooms, including Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks and Chinese origin. The results show a classification sensitivity of 92.0%, classification specificity of 91.5%, and overall accuracy of 93.5%. In particular, δ15N was the most important isotope marker for the identification of the origin of shiitake mushrooms. Hence, the current origin labeling system for mushroom species has to be revised to establish fair trade and avoid improper origin labeling in the global shiitake market.
Subject terms: Fungal biology, Mass spectrometry
Introduction
With the recent expansion of globalized food markets, reliable geographical identification is essential to avoid mislabeling of foodstuffs1,2. The products subjected to the rules of geographical identification for trade between European Union (EU) countries include cheeses, beers, and meats3. The Japanese Agricultural Standard Law also mandates labeling of the geographic origin of foodstuffs to protect consumers and farmers from fraudulent labeling or imitation4,5.
Within the past two decades, global mushroom production has increased substantially6,7. Owing to their unique flavor and taste, shiitake mushrooms (Lentinula edodes) are the second most popularly consumed mushroom worldwide and account for ~22% of the total global mushroom production8–10. A sawdust block method was recently popularized for the supply of high-quality shiitake to consumers owing to its advantages over traditional methods11. In this method, a block composed of oak sawdust, straw, corn cobs, and additional supplements is used for cultivation12–15. In the United States of America (USA), gypsum, manure, cottonseed hulls, corn cobs, and wheat straw are commonly used in the sawdust blocks14. Oak tree sawdust and rice bran are typically used for the production of shiitake mushrooms via the sawdust block method in Korea; however, the method has not yet been standardized.
In Korea, shiitake mushrooms available in the market originate from domestic sources (41%), imported Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks (23%), and China (36%); the quantity of imported Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks for shiitake mushroom production has recently increased16. Subsequently, labeling issues regarding the geographical origin of shiitake mushrooms have recently emerged in Korea. According to the Origin Labeling Act (to be implemented in December 2020), origin labeling of shiitake mushrooms depends on the duration of sawdust block preparation, inoculation, and cultivation in a specific country. Moreover, the rules adopted by the World Trade Organization suggest that labels should indicate the country in which the commodity was fully obtained or, if more than one country was involved in the production of the commodity, the country in which the final substantive transformation was made. Consequently, if the cultivation period of shiitake mushrooms produced using imported Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks in Korea is longer than the sawdust block preparation/inoculation period in China, they should be labeled as domestic (Korean origin), not imported (Chinese origin). Similarly, origin labeling issues for shiitake mushrooms were also reported in the USA17, resulting in competition issues with many American farms. Accordingly, methods for the reliable determination of shiitake mushroom origin are needed.
Despite a lack of standardized methods, various analytical approaches (i.e., separation, spectroscopy, spectrometry, DNA, and sensory analysis) combined with chemometrics have been extensively studied for application in the identification of the accurate geographical origin of foodstuffs (including cereals, beverages, vegetables, meats, and wines) for the past two decades18–21. However, few reports have described the identification of the origin of mushroom species. For example, in Korea, the identification of domestic shiitake mushrooms compared with foreign shiitake mushrooms relies mostly on the morphological features (i.e., cap shape, size, and homogeneity) of the fruiting body or the documents associated with import/export. Thus, a reliable analytical method for the Agricultural Food Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) system is urgently needed for all stages associated with the production, distribution, consumption, and processing of shiitake mushrooms22.
In general, because living organisms in nature display unique isotopic features by physical, chemical, or microbial isotopic fractionation according to independent environmental and geological factors, stable isotope ratio analysis (SIRA) combined with chemometrics is emerging as a reliable and promising tool for the COOL system of agricultural products23–29. In cases of photosynthetic- or soil-based agricultural products, δ13C is mainly associated with the photosynthetic system (C3 versus C4)30, whereas δ15N is affected by regional agricultural practices, N availability, and isotopic fractionation by chemical, physical, microbial, and nutritional conditions in local soil31,32. Additionally, δ18O is influenced by geoclimatic conditions (i.e., altitude, latitude, continental effects, relative humidity, temperature, and amount of precipitation)33. δ34S is mostly related to soil geological properties and is somewhat affected by anthropogenic activities and sea-spray effects23,28,34,35. However, unlike common soil-based agricultural products, most edible mushroom species, including shiitake mushrooms, are produced using the cultivation substrate system in green houses. Additionally, mushrooms are nonphotosynthetic living organisms, and the sawdust block and the environment, such as temperature, humidity, and water/nutrient availability during the mushroom growth period, may affect the δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S features via certain bio-physiological isotopic fractionations36,37. None of systematic studies have been reported the impact of the cultured medium versus cultivation environments on bulk isotope ratios in mushroom so far.
To our knowledge, however, with the exception of sensory determination based on the morphological features of the shiitake fruiting body, few reliable studies have reported discrimination of the origin of shiitake mushrooms consumed in Korea. Here, we examined the feasibility of geographical identification of shiitake mushrooms consumed in Korea using SIRA and established an approach for the geographical traceability of shiitake mushrooms.
Results
Cultivation methods for shiitake mushrooms
Table 1 shows the differences in δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S in shiitake mushroom samples depending on the cultivation method (log versus sawdust blocks). Shiitake mushrooms produced using sawdust blocks included all three origins (Korea, Chinese inoculated sawdust block, and China). Owing to the availability of nutrients during the cultivation period, shiitake mushrooms prepared using sawdust blocks showed higher δ13C, δ15N, and δ34S, but lower δ18O, compared with shiitake mushrooms prepared using logs (p < 0.05). Next, two-dimensional (2D) plots of δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S in shiitake mushrooms were used to visually assess discrimination of the shiitake mushroom cultivation method (Fig. 1). In particular, 2D plots related to δ15N showed a clear separation between log and sawdust block shiitake mushrooms (Fig. 1a–d). The discriminant function (D = [0.767 × δ13C] + [0.589 × δ15N] + [−0.130 × δ18O] + [0.079 × δ34S] + 21.532) demonstrated a clear separation between shiitake mushrooms prepared using the log and sawdust block cultivation methods based on a cutting score value of −1.009 calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). δ15N appeared to be the strongest predictor of the cultivation method according to the standardized canonical discriminant coefficient of 1.053. Additionally, the classification sensitivity and specificity based on ROC curves were 98.9% and 98.7%, respectively (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The overall classification accuracy by discriminant analysis (DA) was 97.7% for both the original set and the cross-validated group (Fig. 2c).
Table 1.
Differences in stable isotope ratios (δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, δ34S) in shiitake mushrooms according to the geographical origin of the sawdust blocks and cultivation method (log versus sawdust block).
| Cultivation method | δ13C | δ15N | δ18O | δ34S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log (n = 75) | −26.01 ± 0.89B | −4.06 ± 1.60B | 24.27 ± 0.83A | 5.03 ±± 1.63B |
| Sawdust block (n = 279) | −24.28 ± 0.93A | 0.08 ± 1.83A | 22.66 ± 1.29B | 11.94 ± 7.15A |
| LSD0.05 | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.31 | 1.64 |
| Sawdust block origin | ||||
| Korean origin (n = 125) | −24.95 ± 0.62C | 1.70 ± 1.35A | 22.15 ± 1.34C | 7.85 ± 4.69C |
| Chinese inoculated (n = 94)a | −23.54 ± 0.68A | −1.20 ± 0.83B | 23.34 ± 1.13A | 16.77 ± 7.98A |
| Chinese origin (n = 60) | −24.02 ± 0.83B | −1.27 ± 0.96B | 22.69 ± 0.86B | 12.91 ± 4.55B |
| LSD p = 0.05b | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 1.83 |
aThe mean δ18O for shiitake mushrooms produced via the Chinese inoculated sawdust block method was based on the number of samples (n = 93).
bThe value of LSDp = 0.05 is meant the results of the least significant difference test with the general linear model, which was performed at the 0.05 probability level.
A–CData with different superscript capital letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to the LSD test.
Fig. 1. Two-dimensional (2D) plots of shiitake mushrooms produced using the log (red) and sawdust block (blue) methods.
The dotted black lines are for illustrative purposes only and do not indicate the results of statistical analysis. The 2D plots by combinations of a δ13C and δ15N, b δ13C and δ34S, c δ15N and δ18O, and d δ15N and δ34S in shiitake.
Fig. 2. Discriminant analysis of shiitake mushroom depending on the cultivation method.

a Discriminant scores of log cultivation, b Discriminant scores of sawdust block cultivation, and c Classification and cross-validated results of the shiitake cultivation method.
Discrimination of shiitake mushroom geographical origin
Next, we examined the geographical origins of shiitake mushrooms obtained from Korea according to the sawdust block origin. The geographical discrimination model showed a clear separation between Korean origin and Chinese inoculated sawdust block/Chinese origin with a cutting score of 0.20 by the first canonical function, explaining 69.72% of the variation in the grouping variable, i.e., whether the mushrooms were of Korean origin. The second canonical function, with a cutting score of −0.27, could not effectively discriminate the origin of the shiitake mushrooms (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). Consequently, this model showed insufficient classification accuracies of 78.4% for the original set and 77.7% for the cross-validated set. In particular, shiitake mushrooms of Chinese origin were identified as Chinese inoculated sawdust block shiitake mushrooms for both the original and cross-validated sets (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3. Discriminant analysis of the geographical origin of shiitake mushrooms according to the sawdust block source (Korean origin, Chinese inoculated sawdust block, Chinese origin).
a Discriminant model developed by δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S in shiitake mushrooms, b Box-and-whisker plots for discriminant scores derived from the first two canonical discriminant functions of the discriminant model developed for the geographical identification of shiitake mushrooms, and c Classification and cross-validated results of the origins of shiitake mushrooms produced by the different cultivation media.
Strategy for the identification of shiitake mushroom origin
A new origin discrimination model was developed and evaluated for the identification of the geographical origin of shiitake mushrooms using the same dataset of stable isotope ratios considering two cases in which shiitake mushrooms generated using the Chinese inoculated sawdust block method were assumed as having Chinese origin (Fig. 4) or Korean origin (Fig. 5). In the first case, the geographical identification model showed a clear grouping between Korean and Chinese origin with a cutting score value of −0.271 by the first canonical function (D = [0.210 × δ13C] + [0.832 × δ15N] + [0.240 × δ18O] + [0.082 × δ34S] − 21.401). The canonical correlation of 0.831 showed that this model explained 69.06% of the variation in the grouping variable. The classification sensitivity and specificity based on the ROC curve were 92.0% and 91.5%, respectively (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). The overall classification accuracy was 93.5% for both the original and cross-validated sample sets (Fig. 4a–c). Moreover, based on a standardized canonical discriminant coefficient of 0.793, δ15N appeared to be the most important predictor to discriminate whether the mushrooms were of Korean origin (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6).
Fig. 4. Discriminant analysis for the geographical identification of shiitake mushrooms produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks, when considered as having a Chinese origin.

a Discriminant scores for shiitake mushrooms with a Korean origin, b Discriminant scores for shiitake mushrooms with a Chinese origin, and c Classification and cross-validated results of the geographical origin of shiitake mushrooms.
Fig. 5. Discriminant analysis for the geographical identification of shiitake mushrooms produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks, when considered as having a Korean origin.

a Discriminant scores for shiitake mushrooms with a Korean origin, b Discriminant scores for shiitake mushrooms with a Chinese origin, and c Classification and cross-validated results of the geographical origin of shiitake mushrooms.
In the second case, which considered shiitake mushrooms of Korean origin, the geographical identification model showed clear overlap between Korean and Chinese origin based on a cutting score value of −0.327 in the first canonical function, only explaining 21.25% of the variation in the grouping variable (Fig. 5a, b and Supplementary Tables 7 and 8). Consequently, this geographical discrimination model exhibited classification accuracies of 82.0% for the original sample set and 80.9% for the cross-validated sample set (Fig. 5c). Therefore, unlike the geographical identification of Korean origin according to the current labeling system, this approach was more accurate and suggested that the shiitake mushrooms produced using the Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks in Korea should be considered and labeled as having Chinese origin, despite the fact that the cultivation was carried out at many farms in Korea. Alternatively, it may be more suitable to provide labeling information establishing that the mushrooms were produced in Korea using sawdust blocks from China. Our results may also be applicable to other countries in which compost medium blocks are imported for other mushroom species such as Agaricus bisporus.
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the geographical origin identification of agricultural products and discussed the limitations of the current origin labeling system, particularly for cultivated mushroom species. In general, the country of origin is the country or region in which the agricultural products are produced or harvested. Internationally, the country of origin indicates the country in possession of the political entity in which the agricultural product was produced or harvested. Domestically, the country of origin also refers to a specific area or region within a country. The COOL system is permitted by international law and has been adopted by most countries (i.e., the EU, the USA, and Japan) to protect agricultural producers and consumers and to facilitate fair trade. Cases of illegal distribution of cheap, low-quality, foreign agricultural products disguised as domestic products have been reported in Korea, particularly during the initial period of trade liberalization by the World Trade Organization. Thus, in Korea, the COOL system was implemented in July 1991, and the enactment of the Act on the Origin of Agricultural and Marine Products for the unification of the origin labeling system occurred in 201022.
To the best of our knowledge, compared with other foodstuffs, very few studies have described the geographical identification of shiitake mushrooms using SIRA. In a prior report based on δ13C and δ15N analyses38, 87.4% and 90.0% of Japanese dried shiitake mushrooms grown via log and mycelial cultivation (similar to sawdust blocks) could be discriminated from Chinese dried shiitake mushrooms grown via log and mycelial cultivation, respectively. However, the dried shiitake samples produced in Korea or Brazil via log or mycelial cultivation did not show suitable discriminative power against Japanese and Chinese dried shiitake mushrooms.
In addition, a recent model39 developed using SIRA (δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, δ34S) combined with orthogonal projection to latent structure-DA also showed good predictability (Q2Y = 0.892) for the geographical identification of dried shiitake slices between Korea and China; in particular, δ15N and δ18O were critical isotope indicators. In this prior report, the discriminative power for dried shiitake slices mainly resulted from the different cultivation methods between Korea (log cultivation) and China (sawdust block cultivation).
However, the identification of shiitake mushrooms originating from sawdust blocks, such as those of Korean origin, imported Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks (cultivated in Korea, the USA, or other countries), and of Chinese origin, has not been reported previously. Accordingly, origin labeling issues have recently emerged in various countries regarding shiitake mushrooms produced in Korea16,39 and the USA17 using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks. Notably, for shiitake mushrooms produced via sawdust block cultivation, the origin labeling of shiitake mushrooms sold in Korea included information regarding the sawdust block source and cultivation region/country. However, because of some conflicts of interest between shiitake farms using domestic sawdust blocks and those using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks, a revised origin labeling system that depends on the period of sawdust block preparation, inoculation, and cultivation in a specific country will be implemented in December 2020 in Korea40. Consequently, shiitake mushrooms prepared using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks can be labeled as having a geographical origin of Korea or China depending on the period associated with shiitake mushroom production. This revised shiitake labeling system is still controversial among shiitake mushroom farmers using domestic or Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks. Similarly, shiitake mushrooms inoculated in China but produced in the USA are allowed to be labeled as “Product of USA.” Accordingly, the origin labeling of shiitake mushrooms produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks is becoming a major issue worldwide17.
Our findings in this study clearly described the similarities and dissimilarities between shiitake mushrooms produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks and those of Korean or Chinese origin. When mushrooms produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks were assumed to have Chinese origin, the classification accuracy was 93.5%; this value dropped to 82% if the mushrooms were considered to have a Korean origin. Consequently, owing to similar SIR features, the geographical identification of shiitake mushrooms produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks should first consider the country or region in which the sawdust blocks were produced. That is, the origin should be considered as China when Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks are used, regardless of the period of shiitake production in another country. Alternatively, a labeling system that includes both the origin of the sawdust blocks and the cultivation country/region may also be suitable to establish fair trade based on reliable origin labeling and to avoid conflicts with the rules of origin established by the World Trade Organization.
In conclusion, the origin labeling system for mushroom species, such as shiitake mushrooms, not soil-based products, must be discussed and appropriately revised to protect consumers and producers from fraud or mislabeling in the global market. At the same time, factors related to the COOL system must also be considered, as should methods to discriminate or label shiitake mushrooms originating from China or produced using Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks. This is the study reporting the limitations of the current COOL system for shiitake mushrooms in the global market. Additionally, our origin discrimination model based on stable isotope ratios may further improve the origin labeling of shiitake mushrooms to prevent fraud and contribute to fair international trade.
Methods
The methods were performed in compliance with relevant guidelines and regulations and approved by the Faculty of Crop Science, Konkuk University.
Shiitake mushroom collection
Fresh shiitake fruiting bodies (1 kg) were obtained from mushroom farms or retail markets in Korea from 2017 to 2019. Shiitake mushrooms produced via the sawdust block method were classified as Korean origin, Chinese inoculated sawdust blocks, and Chinese origin. Korean origin indicated that the mushrooms were produced using certain domestic sawdust blocks made by farms in Korea, and Chinese origin indicated that the mushrooms were fully produced in China. Mushrooms produced via the Chinese sawdust block method were defined as shiitake mushrooms produced in Korea using inoculated sawdust blocks imported from China. In addition, shiitake mushrooms produced via log cultivation were also obtained from some farms in Korea.
Sample preparation for SIRA
The obtained mushrooms were lyophilized at −40 °C for 3 days and pulverized using a grinder to obtain a powder with particles smaller than 400 µm in size. For reliable δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S measurements, ~2.5 mg was enclosed in a tin capsule (3.5 mm × 17 mm; IVA Analysentechinik e. K., Dusseldorf, Germany) for δ13C and δ15N, ~20 mg was added to a larger tin capsule (9 mm × 10 mm; Costech Analytical Technologies Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) for δ34S, and ~0.2 mg was added to a silver capsule (3.5 mm × 5.0 mm; Elemental Microanalysis, Okehampton, UK) for δ18O measurements. The encapsulated samples were placed in a desiccator until SIRA41.
SIRA
δ13C and δ15N in shiitake mushrooms were simultaneously measured using a PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer interfaced with a PDZ Europa 20-20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK)29,41,42. The encapsulated samples were first combusted in a reactor packed with tungsten (VI) oxide at 1000 °C. Subsequently, oxide products were removed in a reduction reactor using reduced copper at 650 °C. Next, the remaining sample gas flowed through a water trap composed of magnesium perchlorate and phosphorous pentoxide along with a helium carrier gas. Finally, CO2 was retained on an adsorption trap until the N2 peak was analyzed; subsequently the adsorption trap was heated at 165 °C to release CO2 and then analyzed via isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS).
δ18O in shiitake mushrooms was analyzed using an Elementar PyroCube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany) interfaced to an Isoprime VisION (Isoprime Ltd., Stockport, UK, a subsidiary of Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). The enclosed samples were thermally decomposed to CO in a glassy carbon reactor at 1400 °C. Next, the CO was isolated using an adsorption trap from any interfering gas, such as N2, and subsequently subjected to the IRMS system.
δ34S in shiitake mushrooms was measured using an Elementar Vario ISOTOPE cube interfaced to a SerCon 20-22 IRMS. The encapsulated samples were first combusted in a reactor with tungsten oxide at 1150 °C. Thereafter, sample gases were reduced using elemental copper at 880 °C and then passed through a buffering reactor at 900 °C. Next, SO2 and CO2 were separated by purge and trap, which enabled full separation and peak focusing. Finally, the adsorption trap was heated, and the sample SO2 was released into the IRMS for δ34S measurement.
Provisional isotope ratio values were adjusted and corrected against the laboratory reference materials (RMs), and the δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S values in the shiitake mushroom samples were finally calculated in part per thousands (‰) with δ value notation: δ, ‰ = ([Rsample – Rstandard]/Rstandard) × 1000, where R is each stable isotope ratio of the sample of interest and the international reference standards. Vienna PeeDee Belemnite for carbon (13C/12C), atmospheric N2 for nitrogen (15N/14N), Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water for oxygen (18O/16O), and Vienna Canyon Diablo Troilite for sulfur (34S/32S) were used as the international reference standards43.
Several laboratory RM replicates, which showed an isotopic composition similar to that of the shiitake mushroom samples, were also analyzed for reliable δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S measurements along with the samples. The laboratory RMs had been calibrated against international RMs and were used for the evaluation of long-term analytical precision described as standard deviations as follows: ≤±0.11‰ for δ13C, ≤±0.12‰ for δ15N, ≤±0.24‰ for δ18O, and ≤±0.37‰ for δ34S during this study period.
Statistical analysis
In this study, more than five analytical replicates (n ≥ 5) of shiitake mushrooms obtained from each farm or retail market were used for the δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S analyses. Each replicate was prepared by pulverization and pooling of at least five shiitake fruiting bodies from all entire samples (1 kg, farm or market). Statistical analysis was first conducted using the least significant difference test with the general linear model, which was performed at the 0.05 probability level using the statistical analysis program SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The results were reported as the mean ± standard deviation of each measurement. Next, for unequally sized grouping variables (shiitake mushroom origin or cultivation method), all independents (i.e., δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, and δ34S) were applied to DA with Wilks’s Lamda method. A cutting score for the binary classifier system was calculated using ROC curves (Supplementary Tables 2, 6, and 8) or was calculated considering the group size and centroid values as follows: Zcutting = (Na × Zb + Nb × Za)/(Na + Nb), where Na and Nb are the sizes of groups a and b, and Za and Zb are the centroids of groups a and b (Supplementary Table 4)44. ROC curves were also used for a more complete evaluation of the classification sensitivity and specificity. All discrimination models (i.e., origin and cultivation method) developed in this study were evaluated for the classification accuracy of the cross-validated set for unknown samples using the leave-one-out method (IBM SPSS statistics version 24, Armonk, NY, USA).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the R&D project (No. PJ01258503) of the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. The article-processing charge (APC) was supported by a BK21 FOUR (Fostering Outstanding Universities for Research, grant no. 4220201013822, team: Crop Genetic Resources Research Team for Future Human Resources Development in Sustainable Premium Agricultural Industry, Konkuk University), the National Research Foundation of Korea, Republic of Korea.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft and revision preparation, Project administration (I.M.C. and S.H.K); Material resources (J.G.H. and W.S.K.); Experiment (Y.J.K., C.K., H.S.M., and S.H.K.); Data interpretation (I.M.C., Y.J.K., C.K., H.S.M., J.G.H., W.S.K., and S.H.K.); Validation (I.M.C., J.G.H., W.S.K., and S.H.K.); Supervision (J.G.H., W.S.K., and S.H.K.); Funding acquisition (S.H.K.). All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [figshare] repository, [10.6084/m9.figshare.13371827].
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41538-021-00085-4.
References
- 1.Longobardi F, Sacco D, Casiello G, Ventrella A, Sacco A. Characterization of the geographical and varietal origin of wheat and bread by means of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) methods and chemometrics: a review. Agric. Sci. 2015;6:126–136. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lo Feudo G, Naccarato A, Sindona G, Tagarelli A. Investigating the origin of tomatoes and triple concentrated tomato pastes through multielement determination by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and statistical analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:3801–3807. doi: 10.1021/jf903868j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Drivelos SA, Georgiou CA. Multi-element and multi-isotope-ratio analysis to determine the geographical origin of foods in the European Union. TrAC Trend Anal. Chem. 2012;40:38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Suzuki Y, Chikaraishi Y, Ogawa NO, Ohkouchi N, Korenaga T. Geographical origin of polished rice based on multiple element and stable isotope analyses. Food Chem. 2008;109:470–475. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ariyama K, Shinozaki M, Kawasaki A. Determination of the geographic origin of rice by chemometrics with strontium and lead isotope ratios and multielement concentrations. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:1628–1634. doi: 10.1021/jf204296p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li M-Y, et al. Arsenic concentrations, speciation, and localization in 141 cultivated market mushrooms: implications for arsenic exposure to humans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;53:503–511. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QC/visualize (Accessed 21 Aug 2020).
- 8.Li X, Zhang H, Xu H. Analysis of chemical components of shiitake polysaccharides and its anti-fatigue effect under vibration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009;45:377–380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ciesla, W. M. Non-Wood Forest Products from Temperate Broad-Leaved Trees. Ch. 9 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, 2002).
- 10.Royse, D. J, Baars, J. & Tan, Q. Edible and Medicinal Mushrooms: Technology and Applications. Ch. 2 (Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, 2017).
- 11.Miles, P. G. & Chang, S. T. Mushrooms: cultivation, nutritional value, medicinal effect, and environmental impact. Ch. 3 (CRC press: New York, 2004).
- 12.Chang R. Functional properties of edible mushrooms. Nutr. Rev. 1996;54:S91–S93. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Royse DJ. Speciality mushrooms and their cultivation. Hortic. Rev. 1996;19:59–97. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seyfferth AL, McClatchy C, Paukett M. Arsenic, lead, and cadmium in US mushrooms and substrate in relation to dietary exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016;50:9661–9670. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Okhuoya JA, Akpaja EO, Oghenekaro A. Cultivation of Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont.) Singer on sawdust of selected tropical tree species. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms. 2005;7:440–441. doi: 10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v7.i3.790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim JY, et al. Investigation of heavy metals and residual pesticides from imported oak mushroom culture-inoculated sawdust media. J. Mushrooms. 2017;15:202–205. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wood, S. Sown in China, grown on high seas, ‘Product of USA’ mushrooms are killing American farms (The Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia, 2019) https://www.inquirer.com/business/kennet-square-mushroom-farm-bankruptcy-chinese-imports-shiitake-20190128.html.
- 18.Camin F, Bontempo L, Perini M, Piasentier E. Stable isotope ratio analysis for assessing the authenticity of food of animal origin. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016;15:868–877. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luykx DMAM, van Ruth SM. An overview of analytical methods for determining the geographical origin of food products. Food Chem. 2008;107:897–911. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peres B, Barlet N, Loiseau G, Montet D. Review of the current methods of analytical traceability allowing determination of the origin of foodstuffs. Food Control. 2007;18:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.09.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gonzalvez A, Armenta S, de la Guardia M. Trace-element composition and stable-isotope ratio for discrimination of foods with Protected Designation of Origin. TrAC Trend Anal. Chem. 2009;28:1295–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2009.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service. Agricultural Product Quality, Origin Management, Country of Origin Labeling. (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Gimcheonsi, 2020. http://www.naqs.go.kr/eng/contents/contents.do?menuId=MN20581. Accessed 14 Aug.
- 23.Kelly S, Heaton K, Hoogewerff J. Tracing the geographical origin of food: the application of multi-element and multi-isotope analysis. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2005;16:555–567. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.08.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chung I-M, et al. C/N/O/S stable isotopic and chemometric analyses for determining the geographical origin of Panax ginseng cultivated in Korea. J. Ginseng Res. 2018;42:485–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu Y, et al. Geographical origin of cereal grains based on element analyser-stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-SIRMS) Food Chem. 2015;174:553–557. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Luo D, et al. The application of stable isotope ratio analysis to determine the geographical origin of wheat. Food Chem. 2015;174:197–201. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dong H, et al. Adulteration identification of commercial honey with the C-4 sugar content of negative values by an elemental analyzer and liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64:3258–3265. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crittenden RG, et al. Determining the geographic origin of milk in Australasia using multi-element stable isotope ratio analysis. Int. Dairy J. 2007;17:421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.05.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chung I-M, et al. Discriminative study of a potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivation region by measuring the stable isotope ratios of bio-elements. Food Chem. 2016;212:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brugnoli, E. & Farquhar, G. D. Phtosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism. Ch. 17 (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 2000).
- 31.Gremaud, G. & Hilkert, A. Modern techniques for food authentication. Ch. 9 (Academic Press: Burlington, 2008).
- 32.Longobardi F, Casiello G, Sacco D, Tedone L, Sacco A. Characterisation of the geographical origin of Italian potatoes, based on stable isotope and volatile compound analyses. Food Chem. 2011;124:1708–1713. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Puscas RH, Cristea GI, Radu S. Stable isotope determination in edible mushrooms from the spontaneous flora of transylvania. Anal. Lett. 2017;52:102–110. doi: 10.1080/00032719.2017.1376218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hedges REM, Thompson JMA, Hull BD. Stable isotope variation in wool as a means to establish Turkish carpet provenance. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:3187–3191. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McArdle N, Liss P, Dennis P. An isotopic study of atmospheric sulphur at three sites in Wales and at Mace Head, Eire. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1998;103:31079–31094. doi: 10.1029/98JD01664. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Badeck F-W, Tcherkez G, Nogués S, Piel C, Ghashghaie J. Post-photosynthetic fractionation of stable carbon isotopes between plant organs—a widespread phenomenon. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:1381–1391. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kelly S, et al. The application of isotopic and elemental analysis to determine the geographical origin of premium long grain rice. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2002;214:72–78. doi: 10.1007/s002170100400. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Suzuki Y, et al. A comparison of dried shiitake mushroom in log cultivation and mycelial cultivation from different geographical origins using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. Bunseki Kagaku. 2015;64:859–866. doi: 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.64.859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chung I-M, et al. Potential geo-discriminative tools to trace the origins of the dried slices of shiitake (Lentinula edodes) using stable isotope ratios and OPLS-DA. Food Chem. 2019;295:505–513. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Marketing Policy Division. Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultual and Fishery Products [Enforcement Date 15 Oct 2019] [Notification No. 2019-56, 15. Oct, 2019., Partial Amendment] http://law.go.kr/LSW/eng/engMain.do (Sejongsi, 2019).
- 41.Chung I-M, Kim J-K, Prabakaran M, Yang J-H, Kim S-H. Authenticity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) geographical origin based on analysis of C, N, O, and S stable isotope ratios: a preliminary case report in Korea, China, and Philippine. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2016;96:2433–2439. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Santruckova H, Bird MI, Lloyd J. Microbial processes and carbon-isotope fractionation in tropical and temperate grassland soils. Funct. Ecol. 2000;14:108–114. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00402.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sharp, Z. Principles of stable isotope geochemistry. Ch. 2 (Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007).
- 44.Ramayah T, Ahmad NH, Halim HA, Zainal SRM, Lo M-C. Discriminant analysis: an illustrated example. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2010;4:1654–1667. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the [figshare] repository, [10.6084/m9.figshare.13371827].


