Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Rev Med Virol. 2020 Jul 30;31(1):1–10. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2146

Predictors of COVID-19 severity: A literature review

Benjamin Gallo Marin 1, Ghazal Aghagoli 1, Katya Lavine 1, Lanbo Yang 1, Emily J Siff 2, Silvia S Chiang 3,4, Thais P Salazar-Mather 1,5, Luba Dumenco 1,5, Michael C Savaria 1, Su N Aung 6, Timothy Flanigan 6, Ian C Michelow 3,4
PMCID: PMC7855377  NIHMSID: NIHMS1619793  PMID: 32845042

Summary

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a rapidly evolving global emergency that continues to strain healthcare systems. Emerging research describes a plethora of patient factors—including demographic, clinical, immunologic, hematological, biochemical, and radiographic findings—that may be of utility to clinicians to predict COVID-19 severity and mortality. We present a synthesis of the current literature pertaining to factors predictive of COVID-19 clinical course and outcomes. Findings associated with increased disease severity and/or mortality include age > 55 years, multiple pre-existing comorbidities, hypoxia, specific computed tomography findings indicative of extensive lung involvement, diverse laboratory test abnormalities, and biomarkers of end-organ dysfunction. Hypothesis-driven research is critical to identify the key evidence-based prognostic factors that will inform the design of intervention studies to improve the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and to appropriately allocate scarce resources.

Keywords: COVID-19, predictors, SARS-CoV-2, severity

1. INTRODUCTION

The newly described coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has strained healthcare systems around the world. The viral spread has been amplified not only by the occurrence of asymptomatic infections but also by limited widespread testing and personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare providers across the world.1 The overwhelming influx of COVID19-infected patients to many hospitals presents a need to thoroughly understand the clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings associated with greater disease severity and mortality. Here, we synthesize the current literature to describe early demographic, clinical, virologic, immunologic, hematological, biochemical, and radiographic factors that may correlate with COVID-19 disease severity. In this paper, we will use the World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of severe pneumonia to categorize severe disease. As of 27 May 2020, the WHO’s most recent clinical guidelines define “severe disease” as adults with clinical signs of pneumonia (fever, dyspnea, cough, and fast breathing) accompanied by one of the following: respiratory rate > 30 breaths/min; severe respiratory distress; or oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 90% on room air.2 The precise determinants of severe disease are not known, but it appears that primarily host factors rather than viral genetic mutations drive the pathogenesis.3 However, emerging data from a non-peer-reviewed paper suggest that a D614G mutation in the viral spike (S) protein of strains from Europe and the United States, but not China, is associated with more efficient transmission.4 Identification of potential risk factors that predict the disease course may be of great utility for healthcare professionals to efficiently triage patients, personalize treatment, monitor clinical progress, and allocate proper resources at all levels of care to mitigate morbidity and mortality. Here, we present a review of the current literature on patient factors that have been proposed as predictors for COVID-19 severity and mortality.

2. METHODS

The primary databases utilized to retrieve the salient medical literature presented in this review were PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The search terms, used both separately and in combination, included: “transmission,” “COVID-19,” “coronavirus,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “Severity,” “Critical,” “Predictor,” “Prognostic,” “Markers,” and “Children.” Only articles in English were included.

3. COMMON SYMPTOMS OF COVID-19

Common clinical symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, dry cough, and fatigue. Less common symptoms include headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting.5 Patients may present with anosmia (loss of smell), dysgeusia (distortion or loss of taste), nausea, and diarrhea a few days prior to the fever. Although fever is an important clue, it may be absent. However, of the 191 patients hospitalized in Wuhan, China, in January 2020, 94% of patients had fever on admission.6 Notably, this statistic is representative only of symptomatic, hospitalized patients. A small proportion of hospitalized patients complain of dyspnea, headache, sore throat, congestion, and hemoptysis while others can remain relatively asymptomatic.68 These symptoms are not specific to COVID-19 and overlap with other viral and bacterial infections.

4. CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF DISEASE SEVERITY

4.1. Demographics

Certain demographic factors reported in the literature are associated with a higher rate of a severe clinical course of COVID-19.914 Among these, older age is a major predictor of mortality and it is thus considered a key factor in the proposed clinical severity risk scores.10,1422 As of 16 March 2020, 62% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the United States were older than age 55. Conversely, less than 1% of hospitalized patients were 19 years old or younger.23 In a retrospective cohort study of 1591 patients in Italy critically ill with COVID-19, the median age was 63 years.22 Data also suggest that male sex is a variable that is independently associated with COVID-19 severity.24,25

4.2. Comorbidities

Pre-existing conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic lung diseases (particularly COPD), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, immunosuppression, obesity, and sickle cell disease, predispose patients to an unfavorable clinical course and increased risk of intubation and death.6,8,10,2631

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued an updated list of risk factors for severe disease.31 Body-mass index (BMI) > 30, which is a proxy for obesity, is considered a strong predictor. A study in Mexico found that among 32 583 patients (12 304 cases and 20 279 controls) who had at least one comorbid disorder, obesity, followed by diabetes, and hypertension were substantial risk factors for both acquiring infection as well as for developing severe disease.32 The CDC also included sickle cell anemia, moderate-to-severe asthma, and pregnancy as risk factors for severe illness.31 Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), which is a surrogate marker for long-term blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus, has been linked to inflammation, hypercoagulation, and high mortality (27.7%).33

The American College of Cardiology released a clinical bulletin in March 2020, that reported increased case fatality rates for patients with pre-existing conditions than those without pre-existing conditions. Fatality rates were highest for cardiovascular disease (10.5%) compared with diabetes (7.3%), COPD (6.3%), hypertension (6.0%), and cancer (5.6%). In contrast, patients without pre-existing conditions had a fatality rate of <1%.34

Cancer is thought to be a major comorbidity that is associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes. A nationwide analysis in China showed that patients with various types of cancer, particularly hematological and pulmonary malignancies, have a higher probability of developing severe COVID-19 complications compared with patients without cancer.35 This trend has been reported by others as well.3639 Unsurprisingly, advanced tumor stage is linked to worse outcomes.37 However, it is possible that COVID-19 mortality in cancer patients is more strongly associated with male sex, comorbidities, and advanced age than chemotherapy or cytotoxic interventions.40 Solid organ transplant recipients also appear to be at a higher risk for COVID-19 complications.41

Investigators have attempted to create prediction models that incorporate several clinical and laboratory parameters. In order to account for comorbidities in such models, a multicenter study in China developed and internally validated a prediction nomogram based on symptoms, vital signs, and comorbidities in 366 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 emergency department (ED) patients.42 This model had a Harrel’s concordance-index (C-Index) of 0.863 (95% CI, 0.801–0.925), which suggests it showed good discrimination and calibration.42

4.3. Hypoxia

A strong association between hypoxemia and worse clinical outcomes has been reported.19,43 A study of 140 patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia found that oxygen saturation (SpO2) > 90.5% predicted survival with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 97.2%, whereas dyspnea was independently associated with mortality in multivariable analyses.43 Within a retrospective group of critically ill patients in Italy, the median partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) was 160 mmHg with a median positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 14 mmHg; the PaO2/FiO2 was found to be higher in younger patients (163.5) and lower in older patients (156).22 In this study, older patients (n = 786, ≥64 years old), when compared to younger patients (n = 796, <64 years old), were more likely to die (36% vs 15%, respectively; difference 21%; 95% CI 17%–26%; P < .001).22

4.4. Radiographic features of severe disease

Imaging modalities are clinically useful in revealing important findings linked to the development of the severe disease. As of 7 April 2020, a multidisciplinary panel of pulmonologists and radiologists from 10 countries established recommendations regarding the use of chest x-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) in COVID-19 patients. The panel recommended that chest imaging is indicated for patients with poor or worsening respiratory function, or if they are determined to be at risk for disease progression.44

In addition, the multidisciplinary panel highlighted that, while CXR can be useful in detecting disease progression, CT is more sensitive early in the disease course.44 The most common CT findings are ground-glass opacities or bilateral consolidation in the peripheral lower lung fields.45,46 However, early in the disease course or in those with mild symptoms, chest imaging may be normal. The presence of pulmonary fibrosis was associated with older age and higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission.47 In a recent report of a small cohort, a significant portion of deceased patients with confirmed COVID-19-associated pneumonia had consolidation and air bronchograms on chest imaging and a minority of survivors had consolidation with or without air bronchograms. The median CT score, which is defined by degree of attenuation and consolidation in specific lung regions, was higher in patients who died.48 Specific CT findings, such as traction bronchiectasis (a subtype of bronchiectasis with bronchial dilation within abnormal lung parenchyma), extensive distribution of abnormalities, and lymph node involvement, have also been reported in critically ill patients. In addition, architectural distortion has been described, which refers to disruption of the normal architecture as defined by the American College of Radiology. The abnormalities include “spiculations radiating from a point and focal retraction or distortion of the edge of the parenchyma.”49 In a retrospective cohort of 81 patients in Wuhan, China, pleural effusions and lymphadenopathy were infrequent CT findings.50 An Italian study that examined CT images of 627 suspected COVID-19 cases suggested that an enlarged pulmonary artery diameter, which may indicate pulmonary arterial hypertension, is associated with COVID-19 mortality.51 In another study of 302 Italian patients, a new CXR scoring system (Brixia 18-point severity scale) together with older age and immunocompromised status could predict the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.52

5. LABORATORY TESTS AND OTHER MARKERS OF END-ORGAN DYSFUNCTION AND DISEASE SEVERITY

Certain laboratory markers may predict COVID-19 prognosis.53 Findings commonly associated with worse outcomes include elevated D-dimer levels, C-reactive protein (CRP), LDH, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I.5,6,8,10,11,5457 However, it remains to be proven that these and other biomarkers are in the causative pathway of SARS-CoV-2-related pathobiology.

5.1. Coagulation defects

Coagulation abnormalities and large-vessel stroke in SARS-CoV-2 patients have been described, suggesting that markers of thrombosis may be of great prognostic importance, even in younger patients.58,59 Elevated D-dimer levels suggest extensive thrombin generation and fibrinolysis, and is associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19,20,55,57,60 which has prompted clinicians to hypothesize that increased D-dimer concentrations are indicative of co-existing venous thromboembolisms that may lead to ventilation-perfusion mismatch.54 Some investigators have proposed the use of D-dimer blood levels for patient triage.61 A study of 343 COVID-19 patients revealed that 12/67 patients with D-dimer levels ≥2.0 μg/mL on admission died compared with only 1/267 patients who had levels <2.0 μg/mL (P < .001; hazard ratio, 51.5; 95% CI, 12.9–206.7).62 In another study, D-dimer levels ≥1.0 μg/mL on admission were associated with higher in-hospital mortality.6 Alterations in other markers of coagulation (thrombocytopenia and prolonged prothrombin time) have been shown to be associated with increased risk of death in COVID-19.53,63,64 Furthermore, restored platelet counts during hospitalization have been shown to predict survival.65 Studies suggest that patients with severe COVID-19 develop hypercoagulability rather than consumptive coagulopathy, resulting in excessive fibrin polymerization and elevated risk of thrombosis.6669 Similarly, high levels of Factor VIII, a procoagulant acute phase reactant and low Protein C activity, an endogenous anticoagulant, have been described in some critically ill patients, suggesting that these biomarkers may be useful to predict COVID-19 severity.70 A case of COVID-19 complicated by ARDS, altered mental status, and acute renal failure had a massive elevation in von Willebrand factor concentration and activity, each >500%, indicating severe endothelial injury.71 These observations may lead to targeted therapeutic interventions to improve outcomes. Therefore, the notion that SARS-CoV-2 can infect vascular endothelium, a major regulator of thrombosis and hemostasis, might account for the thrombotic burden seen in severely affected patients.71,72

5.2. Cardiac dysfunction

Blood chemistry markers of cardiac dysfunction are hypothesized to be associated with COVID-19 severity.73 Emerging evidence that COVID-19 is linked to cardiac complications is mounting, with reports of severe systolic dysfunction74 and fulminant myocarditis.7577 Furthermore, ST-segment elevation in COVID-19 is linked to poor prognosis, despite variabilities in patient presentation.78 Similarly, impaired left-ventricular and right-ventricular function and tricuspid regurgitation (> grade 1) were all found to be significantly linked to COVID-19 mortality.79 A retrospective cohort study of 138 patients reported that patients who received ICU level of care were more likely to have acute cardiac injury than non-ICU patients, although the precipitating event was not defined.5 Similarly, underlying cardiovascular disease predisposes to severe COVID-19-related complications,6 and elevated troponin (as defined by serum levels >99th percentile; > 28 pg/mL) may also be (a) independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality80 and (b) more predictive of poor prognosis than underlying cardiovascular disease alone.81 Thus, routine electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography may be important when assessing the course of COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19-related cardiac complications are associated with elevations in both troponin and brain natriuretic peptides (BNP).79,8285 A meta-analysis that included 17 794 patients demonstrated that patients with high troponin I levels were more likely to have an unfavorable prognosis (OR = 5.22, 95% CI = 2.73–7.31, P < .001) and that high troponin I levels (>13.75 ng/L), in combination with either elevated AST levels (>28 U/L) or older age, (>60 years) were strong predictors of poor outcomes.86

5.3. Alterations in white blood cell (WBC) counts

The WBC repertoire in COVID-19 patients may have some utility in predicting disease severity. Evidence from multiple studies suggests that, compared to patients with mild COVID-19, patients with severe disease have lower granulocyte counts.7,8,87,88 Further evidence also links the severity of COVID-19 to the degree of lymphopenia, in which blood lymphocyte percentage is inversely associated with severity and prognosis.89,90 A recent meta-analysis of 20 peer-reviewed publications identified statistically significant reductions in total lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and NK cells in patients with severe COVID-19 disease compared with moderate or mild cases, and T cell subsets exhibited the largest standardized reduction.91 Other reports have also shown that reduced CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts and decreased functional diversity amongst these cell populations correlate with worse outcomes.87,9294 On the other hand, increased numbers of basophils and neutrophils appear to predict severity.65 In a study of 81 patients, those with an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>9.8) had a higher incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = .005) and higher rates of both non-mechanical and mechanical ventilation (P = .002 and P = .048, respectively).88 Although it has been suggested that COVID-19 patients with peripheral blood eosinophil counts below the normal range (<0.02 × 109/L) are more likely to exhibit chest CT lesions, respiratory complications, and longer hospital stays than patients with a normal eosinophil count—the use of steroids may confound this association.95

5.4. Liver injury

Elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are more likely to occur in patients with critical COVID-19 and end-organ damage.8,96 A study of 329 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with abnormal liver enzyme tests at the time of admission, than those with normal results, had a higher rate of transfer to the ICU (20% vs 8%; P < .001), need for mechanical ventilation (14% vs 6%; P = .005), acute kidney injury (22% vs 13%, P = .009), and mortality (21% vs 11%; P = .009).97 Hypoalbuminemia,75,96 which has been suggested as a predictor of mortality in the general patient population,98 has been implicated as an independent predictive factor for COVID-19 mortality.99,100 Thus, some clinicians have speculated that infusion of albumin in COVID-19 may be potentially protective against mortality, but this has not been proven.101 A reduced albumin-globulin ratio (0.12; 95% CI, 0.02–0.77; P = .024) has also been linked to poor prognosis in COVID-19 cancer patients.37 A recent multicenter, retrospective study of 160 patients of ages between 35 and 65 years suggested that an elevated Liver Fibrosis Index (FIB-4) (≥2.67) is an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19.102 FIB-4 was calculated as follows: (age × AST [IU/L])/(platelets [×109] × √ALT [IU/L]). Elevated FIB-4 was specifically associated with a significantly higher risk of ICU admission and more frequent mechanical ventilation (37.8% vs 18.3%, P = .009).102

5.5. Non-specific biomarkers of cellular injury

Abnormalities in markers of cellular injury, particularly elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), have been linked to greater disease severity.6,9,10,20,75,81,103 Recent data suggest that LDH may be related to respiratory function and be an important predictor of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients.104 A prediction model using age, LDH, and CD4+ ([age × LDH]/CD4) showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was significantly higher than the areas for each of these variables alone.42 A value ≥82 was found to have a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 93% for early prediction of a complicated disease course in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.42 Elevation of α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, another marker of cellular injury that is suggestive of kidney, cardiac, and red blood cell damage, is also thought to be linked with COVID-19 severity.12,105 In a study with a relatively small sample size, α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase was found to be elevated in critically ill patients.103

5.6. Renal dysfunction

Kidney dysfunction and failure have been reported in patients with severe disease.6,13,75,80,106 Certain urine biomarkers, such as urine glucose and protein, have been proposed to offer insight into the degree of COVID-19 severity.107 While renal dysfunction may be indicative of systemic vascular and inflammatory complications, histopathologic analyses have suggested the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 has the capacity to directly infect the renal tubular epithelium,106 suggesting that these and other biomarkers related to renal structure and function may offer prognostic information.

6. CLINICAL APPLICATION OF PREDICTION TOOLS TO RISK STRATIFY PATIENTS

Various prediction models are emerging to risk stratify patients. A lymphocyte percentage-time model has been proposed, in which the changes in patients’ lymphocyte levels were categorized as follows: (a) if the patient’s lymphocyte percentage was >20% within 10 to 20 days after symptom onset, a moderate disease could be predicted, (b) if the patient’s lymphocyte percentage decreased to 5% to 20% within 10 to 20 days after symptom onset, a severe disease progression could be predicted, and (c) if the patient’s lymphocyte percentage decreased to <5% within 17 to 19 days, a high risk of mortality could be predicted.89 In addition, a non-peer-reviewed study of 375 COVID-19 patients identified three key biomarker thresholds (LDH < 365 U/L, lymphocytes >14.7%, high-sensitivity [hs] CRP < 41.2 mg/L) that reliably predicted a favorable prognosis. This study constructed a machine learning-based prognostic prediction model that was able to accurately predict survival rates of severe COVID-19 patients with an accuracy >90%.108 Elevated CRP, alone or in conjunction with other biomarkers, has been proposed as a predictor of COVID-19 severity in other studies as well,20,26,55,107,109111 and a positive correlation between elevated CRP levels and severely abnormal CT findings has been described.90

Because COVID-19 may lead to a cytokine release syndrome and cytokines are important mediators of the inflammatory response, it has been proposed that detecting elevated levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin-6 [IL-6]26,53,57,64,94,109,112 and interleukin-10 [IL-10]53,112,113) may be of great importance for early recognition of severe complications. In this context, a meta-analysis found that a high IL-6/IFN-γ ratio was significantly increased in patients with severe COVID-19,114 although a causative role was not proven. Of note, elevated IL-6 and D-dimer concentrations in patients with cancer have been proposed as risk factors for unfavorable COVID-19 outcomes.37 While a statistically significant elevation of the chemokine, RANTES (CCL5), has been reported in the early stages of mild-to-moderate COVID-19,113 one study has indicated that this marker is linked with severe disease.94 Furthermore, increases in IL-10 and IL-1RA early in the course of disease were significantly associated with severe disease.113 Persistent high levels of plasma IP-10 and monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3) may also be particularly strong predictors for COVID-19 severity, even though at least 14 cytokines have been shown to be increased in critically ill patients.115

7. PREDICTORS OF SEVERITY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Pediatric patients account for a small percentage of COVID-19 cases. Of the 149 082 cases reported in the United States from 12 February to 2 April 2020, only 1.7% of cases were under the age of 18.116 For children 0 to 17 years of age, data from studies suggest that pre-existing conditions and young age (<1 year) are associated with more severe disease.116,117 The comorbidities included chronic lung disease and asthma, cardiovascular disease, immunosuppression, malignancy, thrombocytopenia, severe anemia, epileptic encephalopathy, autism, CHARGE syndrome, and DiGeorge Syndrome.116,117 On the other hand, a retrospective cohort study in the United Kingdom determined that among children with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU for mechanical ventilation, the proportion with complex underlying medical conditions did not differ significantly from those without comorbidities.118,119 Further studies are required to delineate specific risk factors for severe outcomes in children. Nevertheless, it is likely that the lower prevalence of underlying chronic medical disorders in children accounts to some extent for the lower rates of COVID-19 complications in the pediatric population.120

Radiographic studies in children have been described in a retrospective study of 20 COVID-positive hospitalized children in China. Computerized tomography frequently detected consolidation with a surrounding halo sign as well as ground-glass opacities on CT. Although these signs are not pathognomonic of COVID-19, they may support that diagnosis.121

Children with pneumonia are frequently coinfected with viruses and bacteria.122 However, it is not yet known if this phenomenon holds true for SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia. A small study from China described coinfections with other common respiratory viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in some children with COVID-19.121 Further studies will be needed to define whether coinfections predispose to more severe disease.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) temporally related to COVID-19, is a newly described, rare, and potentially life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome with overlapping features of typical or incomplete Kawasaki disease, toxic shock syndrome, or macrophage activation syndrome.123128 It appears that MIS-C represents a post-infectious inflammatory process that follows a few weeks or more after infection with SARS-CoV-2 when the PCR assay is typically negative and antibody test is frequently positive.129 In a case series of eight pediatric patients in the United Kingdom with COVID-19 and MIS-C, all individuals presented with dramatic gastrointestinal symptoms including abdominal pain, non-bloody diarrhea, and vomiting.124 Imaging in five patients revealed gastrointestinal abnormalities including ascites, ileitis, dilation of the biliary tree, and gallbladder edema.124 Decreased WBC and platelet counts, as well as lymphopenia, and elevated ferritin and triglycerides were commonly observed in patients with MIS-C.126

An attractive hypothesis to account for less severe disease in children compared with adults is that children express less cell surface enzyme angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors in their nasal epithelia.130 Because ACE2 is a functional receptor of SARS-CoV-2,131,132 it is possible that lower expression of ACE2 in nasal epithelia could account for reduced viral entry in children and, thus, a milder infection. If this is proven, then targeting ACE2 expression in the nasal epithelium may be a potential therapeutic approach to reduce transmission of COVID-19.

8. LIMITATIONS

The information presented in this review must be considered along with several important limitations. The data presented here were obtained largely from reports that emerged early during the pandemic. In addition, the wide diversity of study methodologies, statistical approaches, sample sizes, population characteristics, geographic sites, and quality of publications may have confounded our interpretation of the data. Finally, many of the apparent associations described in this review have yet to be repeated by other investigators and validated using robust statistical methods. Nevertheless, in the context of a severe pandemic caused by a novel virus, it is vital to address knowledge gaps in the field and identify factors that are potentially predictive of COVID-19 complications that warrant further investigation.

9. CONCLUSION

In order to improve health outcomes, the identification and validation of factors that predict COVID-19 disease progression is vital. Factors including age, comorbidities, immune response, radiographic findings, laboratory markers, and indicators of organ dysfunction may individually or collectively predict worse outcomes. However, the difficulty of predicting COVID-19 disease severity is underscored by the fact that SARS-CoV-2 appears to have tropism for diverse tissues including primarily the respiratory tract but also the brain, endothelium, heart, kidney, and liver.7 Identification of factors that predict complications of COVID-19 is pivotal for guiding clinical care, improving patient outcomes, and allocating scarce resources.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported in part by NIH/NIAID R25AI140490.

Abbreviations:

ALT

alanine aminotransferase

ACE2

angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

ARDS

acute respiratory distress syndrome

AST

aspartate aminotransferase

AUC

area under the curve

AUROC

area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

BMI

body-mass index

CDC

Center for Disease Control and Prevention

CI

confidence interval

COPD

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CRP

C-reactive protein

CT

computed tomography

CXR

chest x-ray

ED

emergency department

HbA1c

glycosylated hemoglobin

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

IFN-γ

interferon gamma

IL-6

Interleukin-6

IL-10

Interleukin-10

LDH

lactate dehydrogenase

MIS-C

multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents temporally related to COVID-19

NHS

National Health Service

OR

odds ratio

PaO2/FiO2

partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio

PEEP

positive end-expiratory pressure

PPE

personal protective equipment

SpO2

oxygen saturation

WHO

World Health Organization

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gondi S, Beckman AL, Deveau N, et al. Personal protective equipment needs in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):e90.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7255297/. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. Clinical Management of COVID-19: Interim Guidance, 27 May 2020. World Health Organization; 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332196/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2020.5-eng.pdf
  • 3.Zhang X, Tan Y, Ling Y, et al. Viral and host factors related to the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Nature. 2020. 10.1038/s41586-020-2355-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang L, Jackson CB, Mou H, et al. The D614G mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reduces S1 shedding and increases infectivity. bioRxiv. June 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.12.148726 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guan W-J, Ni Z-Y, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395 (10223):497–506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mani VR, Kalabin A, Valdivieso SC, Murray-Ramcharan M, Donaldson B. At the epicenter of the American coronavirus outbreak - New York inner city hospital COVID-19 experience and current data: a retrospective analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020. 10.2196/20548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cecconi M, Piovani D, Brunetta E, et al. Early predictors of clinical deterioration in a cohort of 239 patients hospitalized for Covid-19 infection in Lombardy, Italy. J Clin Med Res. 2020;9(5):1548 10.3390/jcm9051548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang C, Gu J, Chen Q, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections in China: a multicenter case series. PLoS Med. 2020;17(6):e1003130 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180:934 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Imam Z, Odish F, Gill I, et al. Older age and comorbidity are independent mortality predictors in a large cohort of 1305 COVID-19 patients in Michigan, United States. J Intern Med. 2020. 10.1111/joim.13119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ciceri F, Castagna A, Rovere-Querini P, et al. Early predictors of clinical outcomes of COVID-19 outbreak in Milan, Italy. Clin Immunol. 2020;217:108509 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Galloway JB, Norton S, Barker RD, et al. A clinical risk score to identify patients with COVID-19 at high risk of critical care admission or death: an observational cohort study. J Infect. 2020. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, et al. Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1966 10.1136/bmj.m1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liang W, Liang H, Ou L, et al. Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Duan J, Wang X, Chi J, et al. Correlation between the variables collected at admission and progression to severe cases during hospitalization among patients with COVID-19 in Chongqing. J Med Virol. 2020. 10.1002/jmv.26082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Q, Cao Y, Chen L, et al. Hematological features of persons with COVID-19. Leukemia. 2020. 10.1038/s41375-020-0910-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):475–481. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323:1574 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) - United States, February 12-March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(12):343–346. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Palaiodimos L, Kokkinidis DG, Li W, et al. Severe obesity, increasing age and male sex are independently associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, and higher in-hospital mortality, in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in the Bronx, New York. Metabolism. 2020;108:154262 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li X, Xu S, Yu M, et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146: 110 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu Z, Cai T, Fan L, et al. Clinical value of immune-inflammatory parameters to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;95:332–339. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Price-Haywood EG, Burton J, Fort D, Seoane L. Hospitalization and mortality among black patients and white patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2534 10.1056/NEJMsa2011686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091 10.1136/bmj.m1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huang S, Wang J, Liu F, et al. COVID-19 patients with hypertension have more severe disease: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Hypertens Res. 2020. 10.1038/s41440-020-0485-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guo W, Li M, Dong Y, et al. Diabetes is a risk factor for the progression and prognosis of COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; e3319 10.1002/dmrr.3319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fneed-extra-precautions%2Fgroups-at-higher-risk.html. Published June 25, 2020. Accessed June 27, 2020.
  • 32.Hernández-Garduño E Obesity is the comorbidity more strongly associated for Covid-19 in Mexico. A case-control study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2020. 10.1016/j.orcp.2020.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang Z, Du Z, Zhu F. Glycosylated hemoglobin is associated with systemic inflammation, hypercoagulability, and prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;164:108214 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mullen B COVID-19 Clinical Guidance For the Cardiovascular Care Team. American College of Cardiology. https://www.acc.org//~/media/Non-Clinical/Files-PDFs-Excel-MS-Word-etc/2020/02/S20028-ACC-Clinical-Bulletin-Coronavirus.pdf. Published June 20, 2003. Accessed May 20, 2004.
  • 35.Liang W, Guan W, Chen R, et al. Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(3): 335–337. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30096-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang L, Zhu F, Xie L, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19-infected cancer patients: a retrospective case study in three hospitals within Wuhan, China. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):894–901. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tian J, Yuan X, Xiao J, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity in patients with cancer in Wuhan, China: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:893 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30309-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kuderer NM, Choueiri TK, Shah DP, et al. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10241):1907–1918. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31187-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mehta V, Goel S, Kabarriti R, et al. Case fatality rate of cancer patients with COVID-19 in a New York hospital system. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:935 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lee LYW, Cazier JB, Starkey T, et al. COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10241):1919–1926. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31173-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pereira MR, Mohan S, Cohen DJ, et al. COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: initial report from the US epicenter. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:1800 10.1111/ajt.15941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou Y, He Y, Yang H, et al. Development and validation a nomogram for predicting the risk of severe COVID-19: a multi-center study in Sichuan, China. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233328 10.1371/journal.pone.0233328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xie J, Covassin N, Fan Z, et al. Association between hypoxemia and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(6): 1138–1147. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner society. Radiology. 2020;296:172 10.1148/radiol.2020201365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AH-T, et al. Frequency and distribution of chest radiographic findings in COVID-19 positive patients. Radiology. 2019;201160 10.1148/radiol.2020201160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, et al. CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology. 2020;295(1):202–207. 10.1148/radiol.2020200230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lei DP. The progression of computed tomographic (CT) images in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia: the CT progression of COVID-19 pneumonia. J Infect. 2020;80:e30 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yuan M, Yin W, Tao Z, Tan W, Hu Y. Association of radiologic findings with mortality of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0230548 10.1371/journal.pone.0230548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). American College of Radiology. 2003. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10014560841/. Accessed April 15, 2020.
  • 50.Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):425–434. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Spagnolo P, Cozzi A, Foà RA, et al. CT-derived pulmonary vascular metrics and clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10(6):1325–1333. 10.21037/qims-20-546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Borghesi A, Zigliani A, Golemi S, et al. Chest X-ray severity index as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in coronavirus disease 2019: a study of 302 patients from Italy. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:291–293. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Henry BM, de Oliveira MHS, Benoit S, Plebani M, Lippi G. Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(7):1021–1028. 10.1515/cclm-2020-0369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jose RJ, Manuel A. COVID-19 cytokine storm: the interplay between inflammation and coagulation. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8: e46 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30216-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shang W, Dong J, Ren Y, et al. The value of clinical parameters in predicting the severity of COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020. 10.1002/jmv.26031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hu L, Chen S, Fu Y, et al. Risk factors associated with clinical outcomes in 323 COVID-19 hospitalized patients in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395 (10239):1763–1770. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, et al. Large-vessel stroke as a presenting feature of Covid-19 in the young. N Engl J Med. 2020;382: e60 10.1056/NEJMc2009787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Xiong W, Mu J, Guo J, et al. New onset neurologic events in people with COVID-19 infection in three regions in China. Neurology. 2020. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(4):844–847. 10.1111/jth.14768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li C, Hu B, Zhang Z, et al. D-dimer triage for COVID-19. Acad Emerg Med. 2020. 10.1111/acem.14037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang L, Yan X, Fan Q, et al. D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(6):1324–1329. 10.1111/jth.14859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, Levy JH. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(6): e438–e440. 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30145-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gao Y, Li T, Han M, et al. Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7):791–796. 10.1002/jmv.25770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chen R, Sang L, Jiang M, et al. Longitudinal hematologic and immunologic variations associated with the progression of COVID-19 patients in China. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:89 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Spiezia L, Boscolo A, Poletto F, et al. COVID-19-related severe hypercoagulability in patients admitted to intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120(6):998–1000. 10.1055/s-0040-1710018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chibane S, Gibeau G, Poulin F, et al. Hyperacute multi-organ thromboembolic storm in COVID-19: a case report. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020. 10.1007/s11239-020-02173-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yaghi S, Ishida K, Torres J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and stroke in a New York healthcare system. Stroke. 2020;51(7):2002–2011. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pavoni V, Gianesello L, Pazzi M, Stera C, Meconi T, Frigieri FC. Evaluation of coagulation function by rotation thromboelastometry in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020. 10.1007/s11239-020-02130-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tabatabai A, Rabin J, Menaker J, et al. Factor VIII and functional protein C activity in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a case series. A A Pract. 2020;14(7):e01236 10.213/XAA.0000000000001236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Escher R, Breakey N, Lämmle B. Severe COVID-19 infection associated with endothelial activation. Thromb Res. 2020;190:62 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417–1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30937-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, et al. A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimally invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020;49(0):E009 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200312-00193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone G, et al. Cardiac involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liu Y, Yang Y, Zhang C, et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63(3):364–374. 10.1007/s11427-020-1643-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chen C, Zhou Y, Wang DW. SARS-CoV-2: a potential novel etiology of fulminant myocarditis. Herz. 2020;45:230 10.1007/s00059-020-04909-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Escher F, Pietsch H, Aleshcheva G, et al. Detection of viral SARS-CoV-2 genomes and histopathological changes in endomyocardial biopsies. ESC Heart Fail. 2020. 10.1002/ehf2.12805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bangalore S, Sharma A, Slotwiner A, et al. ST-segment elevation in patients with Covid-19—a case series. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2478 10.1056/nejmc2009020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rath D, Petersen-Uribe Á, Avdiu A, et al. Impaired cardiac function is associated with mortality in patients with acute COVID-19 infection. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020. 10.1007/s00392-020-01683-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, et al. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cao Z, Li T, Liang L, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Beijing, China. PLoS One. 2020;15(6): e0234764 10.1371/journal.pone.0234764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Franks CE, Scott MG, Farnsworth CW. Elevated cardiac troponin I is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients at an academic medical center in Midwestern USA. J Appl Lab Med. 2020. 10.1093/jalm/jfaa092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Vrsalovic M, Vrsalovic PA. Cardiac troponins predict mortality in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis of adjusted risk estimates. J Infect. 2020. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shi S, Qin M, Cai Y, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of myocardial injury in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(22):2070–2079. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Toraih EA, Elshazli RM, Hussein MH, et al. Association of cardiac biomarkers and comorbidities with increased mortality, severity, and cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients: a meta-regression and Decision tree analysis. J Med Virol. 2020. 10.1002/jmv.26166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zheng H-Y, Zhang M, Yang C-X, et al. Elevated exhaustion levels and reduced functional diversity of T cells in peripheral blood may predict severe progression in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(5):541–543. 10.1038/s41423-020-0401-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ma A, Cheng J, Yang J, Dong M, Liao X, Kang Y. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive biomarker for moderate-severe ARDS in severe COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):288 10.1186/s13054-020-03007-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, Ding J, Miao H. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. March 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.01.20029074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tan C, Huang Y, Shi F, et al. C-reactive protein correlates with computed tomographic findings and predicts severe COVID-19 early. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7):856–862. 10.1002/jmv.25871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Huang W, Berube J, McNamara M, et al. Lymphocyte subset counts in COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis. Cytometry A. 2020. 10.1002/cyto.a.24172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jiang M, Guo Y, Luo Q, et al. T cell subset counts in peripheral blood can be used as discriminatory biomarkers for diagnosis and severity prediction of COVID-19. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:198 10.1093/infdis/jiaa252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Liu Z, Long W, Tu M, et al. Lymphocyte subset (CD4+, CD8+) counts reflect the severity of infection and predict the clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. J Infect. 2020. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Li S, Jiang L, Li X, et al. Clinical and pathological investigation of patients with severe COVID-19. JCI Insight. 2020;5(12). 10.1172/jci.insight.138070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xie G, Ding F, Han L, Yin D, Lu H, Zhang M. The role of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in COVID-19 patients. Allergy. 2020. 10.1111/all.14465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yao N, Wang SN, Lian JQ, et al. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia combined with liver injury in Shaanxi region. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2020;28:E003 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200226-00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Piano S, Dalbeni A, Vettore E, et al. Abnormal liver function tests predict transfer to intensive care unit and death in COVID-19. Liver Int. 2020. 10.1111/liv.14565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Goldwasser P, Feldman J. Association of serum albumin and mortality risk. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(6):693–703. 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Huang J, Cheng A, Kumar R, et al. Hypoalbuminemia predicts the outcome of COVID-19 independent of age and co-morbidity. J Med Virol. 2020. 10.1002/jmv.26003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bi X, Su Z, Yan H, et al. Prediction of severe illness due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of initial fibrinogen to albumin ratio and platelet count. Platelets. 2020;31:674–679. 10.1080/09537104.2020.1760230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Herlekar R, Roy AS, Matson M. Hypoalbuminaemia in COVID-19 infection: a predictor of severity or a potential therapeutic target? J Med Virol. 2020. 10.1002/jmv.26151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ibáñez-Samaniego L, Bighelli F, Usón C, et al. Elevation of liver fibrosis index FIB-4 is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. J Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1093/infdis/jiaa355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhou B, She J, Wang Y, Ma X. The clinical characteristics of myocardial injury 1 in severe and very severe patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. J Infect. 2020;81:147 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Poggiali E, Zaino D, Immovilli P, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein as predictors of respiratory failure in CoVID-19 patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;509:135–138. 10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zhang G, Zhang J, Wang B, Zhu X, Wang Q, Qiu S. Analysis of clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of 95 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a retrospective analysis. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):74 10.1186/s12931-020-01338-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020;97(5): 829–838. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wang G, Wu C, Zhang Q, et al. C-reactive protein level may predict the risk of COVID-19 aggravation. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(5): ofaa153 10.1093/ofid/ofaa153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yan L, Zhang H-T, Xiao Y, et al. Prediction of criticality in patients with severe Covid-19 infection using three clinical features: a machine learning-based prognostic model with clinical data in Wuhan. medRxiv. 2020. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.27.20028027v2.full.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Liu F, Li L, Xu M, et al. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J Clin Virol. 2020;127:104370 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Luo X, Zhou W, Yan X, et al. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Satici C, Demirkol MA, Altunok ES, et al. Performance of pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Han H, Ma Q, Li C, et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):1123–1130. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1770129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Zhao Y, Qin L, Zhang P, et al. Longitudinal COVID-19 profiling associates IL-1Ra and IL-10 with disease severity and RANTES with mild disease. JCI Insight. 2020. 10.1172/jci.insight.139834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lagunas-Rangel FA, Chávez-Valencia V. High IL-6/IFN-γ ratio could be associated with severe disease in COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol. 2020;6736:19 10.1002/jmv.25900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yang Y, Shen C, Li J, et al. Plasma IP-10 and MCP-3 levels are highly associated with disease severity and predict the progression of COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:119 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Coronavirus disease 2019 in children—United States, February 12–April 2, 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Parri N, Lenge M, Buonsenso D. Coronavirus Infection in pediatric emergency departments (CONFIDENCE) research group. Children with Covid-19 in pediatric emergency departments in Italy. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:187 10.1056/NEJMc2007617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Issitt RW, Booth J, Bryant WA, et al. Children with COVID-19 at a specialist Centre: initial experience and outcome. Lancet Child Adolescent Health. 2020. 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30204-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.COVID-19 – high risk shielded patient list identification methodology - NHS Digital. NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk/coronavirus/shielded-patient-list/methodology. Accessed June 24, 2020.
  • 120.Singh T, Heston SM, Langel SN, et al. Lessons from COVID-19 in children: key hypotheses to guide preventative and therapeutic strategies. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Xia W, Shao J, Guo Y, Peng X, Li Z, Hu D. Clinical and CT features in pediatric patients with COVID-19 infection: different points from adults. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:1169 10.1002/ppul.24718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Michelow IC, Olsen K, Lozano J, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):701–707. 10.1542/peds.113.4.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jones VG, Mills M, Suarez D, et al. COVID-19 and Kawasaki Disease: Novel Virus and Novel Case. Hospital pediatrics. April 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Riphagen S, Gomez X, Gonzalez-Martinez C, Wilkinson N,Theocharis P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1607–1608. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31094-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Viner RM, Whittaker E. Kawasaki-like disease: emerging complication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31129-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gervasoni A, et al. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1771 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31103-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.WHO. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and adolescents temporally related to COVID-19. World Health Organization. 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/multisystem-inflammatory-syndrome-in-children-and-adolescents-with-covid-19. Accessed June 26, 2020.
  • 128.Panupattanapong S, Brooks EB. New spectrum of COVID-19 manifestations in children: Kawasaki-like syndrome and hyperinflammatory response. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020. 10.3949/ccjm.87a.ccc039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Shulman ST. Pediatric COVID-associated multi-system inflammatory syndrome (PMIS). J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020. 10.1093/jpids/piaa062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Bunyavanich S, Do A, Vicencio A. Nasal gene expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in children and adults. JAMA. 2020;323:2427 10.1001/jama.2020.8707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003; 426(6965):450–454. 10.1038/nature02145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(4):586–590. 10.1007/s00134-020-05985-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES