Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Control. 2020 Jul 24;30(5):601–602. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055698

The use of flavour cards and other additives after a menthol ban in Canada

Michael Chaiton 1, Robert Schwartz 1, Joanna E Cohen 1, Eric Soule 1, Bo Zhang 1, Thomas Eissenberg 1
PMCID: PMC7856206  NIHMSID: NIHMS1658750  PMID: 32709606

Introduction:

In Canada, where bans on menthol have been implemented in the province of Ontario since January 2017, and across Canada since October 2017, products that can be used to add menthol flavour to non-mentholated tobacco such as flavour cards and menthol drops are available in stores, including the brand “Itsa” which is distributed by a cigar company. These products can easily add menthol flavour by either placing the card or drops with the tobacco or in the package as a way of circumventing the ban. However, in Ontario it appear that no major cigarette manufacturers had produced or advertised these flavour additives. The purpose of this letter is to examine the changes in use of after-market menthol additives after the menthol ban in Ontario.

Methods:

Current (past month) cigarette smokers aged 16+ living in Ontario were surveyed pre-ban September to October 2016, then January 2017, January 2018, and January 2019. More details on the survey are available elsewhere (2). Questions about use of additive cards, drops, and oils to add menthol to tobacco were asked of menthol smokers (both daily menthol cigarette smokers, and those who use menthol occasionally at least once in the past year) at all time points. The question was also asked of pre-ban non-menthol cigarette smokers in 2018 and 2019. A total of 1309 people responded to at least one of the additive questions.

Results:

Overall, 14.6% (95% CI: 11.0, 19.2) of pre-menthol ban daily menthol cigarette smokers had reported using some sort of additive since the ban compared to 9.8% (95% CI:7.8, 12.2) of pre-menthol ban occasional menthol cigarette smokers (Table 1). Before the menthol ban, 4.4% (95% CI: 2.6, 7.8) of daily menthol smokers had previously tried flavour additives, rising to 5.1% (95% CI: 2.9, 8.7) by January 2017, 12.5% (95% CI: 8.5, 18.0) by 2018 and 9.5% (95% CI: 5.9, 14.9) in 2019 (Table 1). In 2018, 2.6% (95% CI: 1.3, 5.1) of pre-ban non-menthol smokers had also tried the after-market additives, falling to 0.8% (95% CI: 0.2, 3.0) in 2019. Flavor additive use was not significantly associated with making a quit attempt.

Table 1.

Percentage reporting use of flavour cards, drops, oils or other additives to add menthol to tobacco in Ontario, Canada 2016–2019 (n=1309).

Percent reporting use of flavour additive
N % 95 % CI p value
Gender
  Female 747 8.4 [6.6,10.7] p<0.001
  Male 550 9.5 [7.3,12.2]
  Other 10 50.0 [22.4,77.6]
  Total 1,307 9.2 [7.7,10.9]
Age p=0.002
  16–29 210 14.8 [10.6,20.2]
  30+ 1,099 8.1 [6.6,9.9]
  Total 1,309 9.2 [7.7,10.9]
Education p=0.021
  High School or Less 395 6.3 [4.3,9.2]
  More than High School 898 10.4 [8.5,12.5]
  Total 1,293 9.1 [7.7,10.8]
Race p=0.239
  Non-White 234 11.1 [7.7,15.8]
  White 1,073 8.7 [7.1,10.5]
   1,307 9.1 [7.7,10.8]
Frequency of Smoking p=0.003
  Daily 1,172 8.4 [6.9,10.1]
  Occasional 137 16.1 [10.8,23.2]
  Total 1,309 9.2 [7.7,10.9]
Baseline ever use of non-cigarette flavoured tobacco products (e-cigarettes, hookah, smokeless, bidi, kreteks) p<0.001
  No 649 4.8 [3.4,6.7]
  Yes 660 13.5 [11.1,16.3]
  Total 1,309 9.2 [7.7,10.9]
Made a quit attempt since the menthol ban p=0.271
  No 221 8.1 [5.2,12.6]
  Yes 672 10.7 [8.6,13.3]
  Total 893 10.1 [8.3,12.2]
Baseline Menthol Smoking Status p<0.001
  Non-Menthol 313 2.6 [1.3,5.1]
  Occasional Menthol 702 9.8 [7.8,12.3]
  Daily Menthol 294 14.6 [11.0,19.2]
  Total 1,309 9.2 [7.8,10.9]

Percent not reporting flavour additive usage not reported. Characteristics reported at baseline except for having made a quit attempt since the ban.

Conclusion:

Despite a lack of promotion by major tobacco companies, flavour cards or additives were used by 14.6% of pre-menthol ban daily menthol smokers, a substantial minority, to substitute for the lack of availability of menthol cigarettes. The cards were also used by those who had not smoked menthol cigarettes before the ban. In December 2019, Imperial Tobacco in the United Kingdom announced a new line of ‘flavour cards’ as a way for retailers to “provide shoppers with options to help them stick with their flavour preference post ban and protect their sales as a result.”(3) This suggests a change in industry practice to use flavour additives more prominently to circumvent the May 2020 menthol ban in the European Market. If these additive products are more available and promoted than they were in Canada, they may limit the effectiveness of the upcoming menthol restrictions in the Europe.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number P50DA036105 and the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the NIH Office of the Director under 1R21DA047358-01. Drs. Eissenberg, Cohen, and Soule’s effort is also supported by NIDA and CTP/FDA under U54DA036105. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the NIH or the FDA.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Eissenberg is a paid consultant in litigation against the tobacco industry and is named on a patent application for a device that measures the puffing behavior of electronic cigarette users.

References

RESOURCES