Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):e01964-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01964-20

The Compact Macronuclear Genome of the Ciliate Halteria grandinella: A Transcriptome-Like Genome with 23,000 Nanochromosomes

Weibo Zheng a,b,c, Chundi Wang a, Michael Lynch b,, Shan Gao a,d,
Editors: Laura A Katze, Douglas G Caponef
PMCID: PMC7858049  PMID: 33500338

How to achieve protein diversity by genome and transcriptome processing is essential for organismal complexity and adaptation. The present work identifies that the macronuclear genome of Halteria grandinella, a cosmopolitan unicellular eukaryote, is composed almost entirely of gene-sized nanochromosomes with extremely short nongenic regions.

KEYWORDS: alternative DNA splicing, ciliate, Halteria grandinella, nanochromosomes, transcriptional initiation

ABSTRACT

How to achieve protein diversity by genome and transcriptome processing is essential for organismal complexity and adaptation. The present work identifies that the macronuclear genome of Halteria grandinella, a cosmopolitan unicellular eukaryote, is composed almost entirely of gene-sized nanochromosomes with extremely short nongenic regions. This challenges our usual understanding of chromosomal structure and suggests the possibility of novel mechvanisms in transcriptional regulation. Comprehensive analysis of multiple data sets reveals that Halteria transcription dynamics are influenced by: (i) nonuniform nanochromosome copy numbers correlated with gene-expression level; (ii) dynamic alterations at both the DNA and RNA levels, including alternative internal eliminated sequence (IES) deletions during macronucleus formation and large-scale alternative splicing in transcript maturation; and (iii) extremely short 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) and universal TATA box-like motifs in the compact 5′ subtelomeric regions of most chromosomes. This study broadens the view of ciliate biology and the evolution of unicellular eukaryotes, and identifies Halteria as one of the most compact known eukaryotic genomes, indicating that complex cell structure does not require complex gene architecture.

INTRODUCTION

Ciliates are regarded as one of the most diverse and highly differentiated groups of unicellular eukaryotes, based on their nuclear dimorphism (each cell contains two types of nuclei, a germ line micronucleus and a somatic macronucleus), complex epidermal ciliation, and strong swimming ability (1, 2). These features make ciliates excellent models for research in cell biology and evolution (38), leading to many important biological discoveries, including catalytic RNA, telomerase, and histone acetylation (911).

Halteria grandinella is a highly specialized ciliate distributed worldwide and very common in all freshwater ecosystems (1214). It can be easily distinguished from other ciliates by its special “jumping” motion, remaining stationary for a while and then swimming rapidly backward at a speed of 100 body lengths per second (13, 15). Since the first report of Halteria grandinella by Mueller (1773), much research on morphology, taxonomy, ecology, and cell biology has been performed (1216), illustrating the potential of this organism as a model for biological studies.

Unlike the well-studied ciliate models whose macronuclear genomes are slightly fragmented into ∼200 and ∼800 chromosomes (1719), such as Tetrahymena and Paramecium, Halteria possesses a polyploid macronuclear genome (63 Mb haploid genome size with ∼23,000 chromosomes) with a 2,800-bp mean chromosome size (Fig. 1). This extremely fragmented macronuclear genome resembles the macronuclear genome of Oxytricha trifallax (16,000 nanochromosomes with a mean length of ∼3,200 bp) (20). Nanochromosomes in Halteria are capped with telomeres on both ends (5′ telomere [C4A4]2–3C4) and usually only code for a single gene. Even the smallest chromosome in Oxytricha (430 bp) possesses a single well-positioned nucleosome (21), suggesting that transacting factors, such as ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers, are involved in transcription regulation in nanochromosomes. Due to this one-gene one-chromosome feature (22), the colinear structure of multiple genes common to almost all eukaryotic organisms is greatly limited, further restricting the definition of a conventional “intergenic region.” The intergenic regions in most eukaryotes are non-coding regions surrounded by two genes and usually harbor numerous regulatory components, such as promoters and enhancers (23, 24). In contrast, most noncoding regions (except introns) of Halteria are very short and directly flanked by telomeres rather than genes. These distinct features of the Halteria macronuclear genome suggest the possibility of novel mechanisms in the regulation of transcriptional processes.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Comparison of macronuclear genome features. The molecular phylogenetic relationship was constructed by using the maximum likelihood method based on MUSCLE multiple-sequence alignment of 18S rRNA genes (Halteria, MF002432.1; Stylonychia lemnae, AM233915.1; Oxytricha trifallax, FJ545743.1; Euplotes octocarinatus, LT623905.1; Tetrahymena thermophila, M10932.1; Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, U17354.1; Paramecium tetraurelia, AB252009.1; Stentor coeruleus, JQ282899.1; and an outgroup Plasmodium falciparum, MF155937.1). Genome statistics for Halteria were determined in this study. Other statistics were obtained from the following sources: a, reference 25; b, reference 20; c, reference 77; d, reference 18; e, reference 78; f, reference 79; g, reference 19; h, reference 56; i, reference 80. The scale bar corresponds to 0.1 expected substitutions per nucleotide site.

To comprehensively understand the transcriptional dynamics in this highly compact genome, we carried out deep genomic sequencing to reveal the first macronuclear genome sequences of Halteria with gene prediction and functional annotation. Furthermore, by integrating genome and transcriptome data sets, we addressed and analyzed several challenges arising from this highly fragmented genome. This research broadens the view of ciliate biology and the evolution of unicellular eukaryotes, and identifies Halteria as one of the most compact known eukaryotic genomes, indicating that complex cell structure does not require complex gene architecture.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Transcriptome-like genome.

The macronuclear (MAC) genome of Halteria is composed of nanochromosomes. After removal of low-quality and nearly identical contigs, mitochondrial contigs (four, summing to 50 kb), and contamination from bacterial genomes, the final assembly of the Halteria macronuclear genome is ∼64 Mb and includes 40,570 contigs. Only 13 out of 40,570 contigs have non-self matches that are ≥99% identical (matches that are ≥100 bp), indicating that the assembled genome is haploid. The haploid size of the Halteria MAC genome is similar to that of other ciliates with nanochromosomes, such as Oxytricha, Stylonychia, Euplotes, Nyctotherus, Urostyla, Paraurostyla, and Tetmemena, each of which has a 50 to 70 Mb MAC genome (20, 2528) (Fig. 1). A total of 16,506 contigs (∼35 Mb) of this assembly have telomeres on both ends, each representing a complete MAC chromosome (Table 1). Contigs with one telomere (13,251, totaling ∼17 Mb) and zero telomeres (10,813, totaling ∼12 Mb) comprise less than half of the whole assembly (Fig. 2A). The estimated haploid chromosome number of the MAC genome is 23,131 (half the number of one-telomere contigs plus the number of two-telomere contigs). The overall GC content of all contigs, 43.11% (42.91% for all two-telomere chromosomes), is relatively high compared with other ciliates (18, 20, 29). The final assembly was verified by BLAST against bacterial genomes to ensure there was no bacterial contamination from the food source of Halteria (30) and was estimated to contain negligible MIC sequence contamination by comparing the reads coverage of adjacent regions (31). Structural variation of the high ploidy MAC chromosomes, however, will be resolved in the future by long-read sequencing technology such as single molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing (3).

TABLE 1.

Statistical details of genome assembly

Parametera Two-telomere contigs One-telomere contigs Zero-telomere contigs Total
No. all contigs 16,506 13,251 10,813 40,570
No. contigs ≥ 1 kb 13,582 6,412 3,661 23,655
No. contigs ≥ 5 kb 689 215 100 1,004
No. contigs ≥ 10 kb 57 20 23 100
No. contigs ≥ 25 kb 1 1 0 2
No. contigs ≥ 50 kb 1 0 0 1
Largest contig (bp) 74,041 41,562 17,665 74,041
Total length (bp) 34,693,884 17,510,270 11,948,065 64,152,219
N50 (bp) 2,485 1,767 1,214 2,064
N75 (bp) 1,653 1,029 752 1,232
L50 (no.) 4,407 2,952 2,668 9,385
L75 (no.) 8,706 6,221 5,855 19,399
GC (%) 42.59 43.53 44.00 43.11
a

N50/N75, the length of the contig at 50/75% of the cumulative total length of the whole genome. L50/L75, the smallest number of contigs whose length sum produces N50/N75.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Features of the transcriptome-like genome of Halteria. (A) Distribution of GC content across total lengths of 0-, 1-, and 2-telomere contigs. (B) Length distribution of contigs with 0, 1, and 2 telomeres. (C) Sliding-window analysis of nucleotide content. Window size was 1% of the whole chromosome, excluding telomeres. Only the coding strands of single-gene coding chromosomes were used. GC skew: (G−C)/(G+C). (D) Distribution of RNA coverage level of all contigs in Halteria, and distribution of DNA coverage level for all contigs in Halteria, Oxytricha, and Paramecium genomes (density plot, with the area under each curve normalized to 1.0). All data sets were normalized to the same average coverage level by controlling the total reads number. A microphotograph of a living Halteria is shown.

If we focus on the well-assembled chromosomes (2-telomere contigs), we see an assembly of tiny chromosomes. Including the length of telomeres (20 to 28 bp on each chromosome end), the N50 length (the length of the contig at 50% of the cumulative total length of the whole genome) of two-telomere capped chromosomes is just 2,485 bp, which is close to the length of a regular transcript (below). This length is much smaller than that found in Oxytricha trifallax (3,392 bp, strain JRB510), which has a similar well-assembled highly fragmented macronuclear genome (28). The distribution of chromosome lengths indicates that ∼74% of all two-telomere chromosomes have lengths of <2,500 bp, with 138 having lengths of <500 bp. The longest was 74,042 bp and the shortest was 345 bp (Fig. 2B).

Gene prediction and genome annotation. A total of 28,203 genes were predicted, 16,267 of which have functionally annotated orthologs in other species, with the remaining 11,936 predicted as hypothetical protein-coding genes without functional information. A total of 11,800 chromosomes contain at least one gene, most of them (77%) only encoding a single gene (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The gene number in each contig correlates with the length of the contig (mean lengths of contigs containing 1, 2, and 3 genes: 1,643, 2,748, and 3,595 bp). However, the longest complete chromosome, which is 74,042 bp in length, contains only a single gene (length: 63,864 bp) with best hits to titin-like genes in the Swiss-Prot database (32). Part of this gene has high similarity (total length of the matched region is 26,187 bp, with 58% identity) with the longest gene of Oxytricha trifallax (located in contig7580 of this species and denoted “Jotin”), which is 64,614 bp in length and also encoded in the longest chromosome (65,957 bp) (20).

FIG S1

The distribution of numbers of genes in gene-coding chromosomes (2-telomere contigs). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.2 MB (1.3MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Sliding-window analyses of the coding strands of single-gene chromosomes reveal spatial variation in nucleotide content (Fig. 2C). On average, the transcribed region is slightly adenine rich (A: ∼31%; T: ∼26%), and there is an obvious GC skew, measured as (G−C)/(G+C), in the 3′ subtelomeric region of the coding strand. A similar phenomenon was previously noted in Oxytricha, but we could not detect the ∼10-bp periodicity reported therein (33). A potential explanation for the strand-sensitive GC bias in 3′ subtelomeric regions of coding strands is that, unlike the transcribed anti-sense strand, which is used as a template and protected by the transcription complex, the nontranscribed coding strand is single-stranded during transcription. When exposed as a single strand, cytosine is prone to deamination to uracil, resulting in errors in newly synthesized strands (33, 34). Under this hypothesis, compared with the 5′ subtelomeric region, which may be renatured in a shorter time after the initiation of transcription (35), and the coding region, which is under stronger selective pressure, the 3′ subtelomeric region may be more vulnerable to the accumulation of deamination-associated mutations (34), causing cytosines to be replaced by guanines, forming the GC skew. We also analyzed the base composition in the subtelomeric region (Fig. S2), however, we did not detect the ∼10-bp periodicity reported in Oxytricha (33). Nonetheless, there is a high similarity between the base compositions of forward and reverse strands, which is consistent with the speculation that this skewed base composition is not a transcription-related outcome (33).

FIG S2

Shannon entropy (H) composition of each nucleotide for the first 200 positions of all single-gene coding chromosomes. (A) All chromosomes. (B) Chromosomes with blast hits in the forward direction. (C) Chromosomes with blast hits in the reverse direction. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.3 MB (1.3MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Copy numbers of macronuclear chromosomes are correlated with expression level. By mapping the Illumina sequencing reads back to the genome assembly, we obtained an average sequencing coverage of contigs of 108×. At such high coverage, if the copy numbers of macronuclear chromosomes of Halteria are uniform, the coverage distribution should be approximately Gaussian in form, with deviations largely resulting from random errors in sequencing and assembly. However, the distribution of sequencing coverage of contigs, which is expected to reflect chromosomal copy numbers, is strongly skewed, much like the typical distribution of transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) reads coverage (reflecting wide-range expression levels) in most species (36) (Fig. 2D). This suggests that in the polyploid macronuclear genome of Halteria, copy numbers of each nanochromosome are nonuniform, with a range of 400× between the low- and high-copy-number chromosomes (Fig. 2D). We also performed the same analysis on Oxytricha trifallax (genome assembly: GCA_000295675.1, genome reads: SRX955799) and Paramecium tetraurelia (genome assembly: GCA_000165425.1, genome reads: ERX2814584) (Fig. 2D). O. trifallax has highly fragmented nanochromosomes and nonuniform chromosome copy numbers as in Halteria (20), whereas P. tetraurelia has 200 chromosomes with more uniform copy numbers (800 to 1,000 copies for each chromosome) (37). As shown in Fig. 2D, Paramecium shows a significantly different copy number distribution than the skewed distributions in Halteria and Oxytricha.

This kind of nonuniform copy number is potentially relevant to the transcriptome. By mapping the RNA-seq reads to the reference genome, a positive correlation between genome copy number and expression level is revealed. The Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient between the genome copy number and average expression level of four RNA-seq replicates is ∼0.56 (P value < 2.2e−16). Thus, chromosomes with higher copy numbers tend to have higher expression levels. For O. trifallax, which also has nanochromosomes and positively correlated copy number and expression level (20), Khurana et al. (38) found that 21-nt (nucleotide) small noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) play important roles in controlling the copy numbers of chromosomes. These small ncRNAs have target biases toward transcription start sites and may directly or indirectly activate mRNA expression. Although the detailed regulatory functions of small ncRNAs in ciliates with highly fragmented macronuclear genomes is still unknown, based on these observations, we speculate that Halteria may utilize similar mechanisms as O. trifallax, whereby small ncRNAs play a role in regulating both chromosomal copy number and expression level, resulting in the positive correlation between them. However, because the partitioning of macronuclear chromosomes occurs by an unknown amitotic mechanism, rather than by mitosis, we cannot rule out the possibility that much of the covariance in chromosome copy number and gene expression level is a simple consequence of cumulative drift of chromosomal copies during asexual propagation (3942), rather than a direct product of regulation.

Sequence conservation and copy number are reported to be correlated in some eukaryotes, such as Paramecium (19, 43). To investigate whether this is the case in Halteria, we compared the number of genes that are successfully mapped with the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) database in 100 quantiles ranked from low to high by their copy numbers. Genes with the top 10% highest copy numbers have obviously higher mapping rate within the COG database (Fig. S3). However, the mapping rate remained at essentially the same low level in the first 90 quantiles, covering a wide range of copy numbers (Fig. S3). Our results thus suggested that gene copy number is less likely to be associated with sequence conservation in Halteria.

FIG S3

Copy number and number of genes successfully matched to COG database. Each bin contains 280 genes. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.3 MB (321KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Chromosomal drift during asexual reproduction in clonal culture. Contrary to the situation in species with normal mitotic reproduction, the high numbers chromosome copies in ciliate macronuclei are distributed to progeny in a nonmitotic fashion, leading to the long-term divergence of allelic copies from a 1:1 ratio during clonal propagation (41), blurring the conventional definition of heterozygosity, which we here define as simply implying the presence of two variants at a nucleotide site. Macronuclear mutation during asexual growth may also contribute transiently to the heterozygosity of ciliate MAC genomes (43, 44). By conservatively taking 0.05 to be a cutoff for the minimum frequency of a heterozygous site (with a minimum total coverage of each site of 30×, and for the minor allele of 5×) to guard against false-positives from sequencing errors, we attempted to identify the full spectrum of heterozygous sites. This leads to the identification of 0.96% (616,991) of sites as heterozygous (0-fold redundant sites = 0.48%; 2-fold sites = 1.50%; 4-fold sites = 2.54%; introns = 1.52%; untranslated subtelomeric regions without telomeres = 1.02%).

Theoretically, if all alleles divided equally into the genomes of daughter cells after each asexual division, alleles should have average frequencies of 0.5 (with variation around this expectation resulting from random sampling of parental chromosomes). This is consistent with our observation that the distribution of minor-allele frequencies peaks at 0.5 (Fig. 3A), but this distribution is also widely distributed from 0.05 to 0.5, with a minor peak at 0.05. The pattern remains after increasing the coverage cutoff for each heterozygous site to 100×, indicating that sequencing error is not the cause of the wide distribution of allele frequencies. We simulated the expectation of this distribution under the assumption of conventional binomial sampling of heterozygous sites assumed to all have 0.5 frequencies (supplemental material appendix, Code S1), demonstrating that the wide distribution seen in Halteria is incompatible with simple random sequencing variation (Fig. 3B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Polymorphic sites in nanochromosomes. (A) Distribution of minor-allele frequency (MAF) for polymorphic sites. The bin size is 0.01. (B) Distributions of allele-frequency estimates and observations. The bin size is 0.01. (C) The mean value of the MAF (gradually increasing) as a function of total sequencing coverage. All heterozygous sites are divided into 50 groups based on the sequencing coverage of chromosomes. Each dot represents a window size of 5× coverage.

This wide variation of allele frequency of heterozygous sites is likely a result of chromosomal copy drift. Under this view, during asexual reproduction, the macronuclear chromosomes of parental Halteria cells are partitioned unequally into daughter cells, gradually increasing deviations from the initial 1:1 ratio of allele pairs expected following the last sexual reproduction event. Such asexual chromosomal copy drift is expected to increase with the number of clonal cell divisions, explaining why clonal lab strains of many ciliates cannot be maintained for long periods (chromosomal copy drift may reduce cell fitness) (45).

As demonstrated in the previous section, the macronuclear genome of Halteria is composed of polyploid nanochromosomes with nonuniform copy numbers. In support of the chromosomal-drift hypothesis, there is a positive correlation between the estimated allele frequencies and sequencing coverage (reflecting the copy numbers of chromosomes; Fig. 3C), with heterozygous sites on high-copy chromosomes tending to have estimated frequencies closer to 0.5. As larger deviations in allele frequencies are expected with smaller chromosomal pools, we conclude that chromosomes that have drifted to the smallest copy numbers also experience the highest levels of allele-frequency drift. Our observations are consistent with previous theory on the stochastic drift process and senescence in ciliates by Kimura (40), Preer (39), and Duerr et al. (41). Similar observations were also reported in genome research of Oxytricha trifallax (20), indicating that the chromosomal drift is common in ciliates with highly fragmented macronuclear genomes.

Genome and transcriptome processing increases the diversity of proteins.

Cryptically excised IESs in nanochromosomes. During the formation of the highly fragmented macronuclear genome, DNA segments of the micronuclear genome called IESs (internally eliminated sequences) are eliminated (46). These DNA segments are distinguished by their “pointer-sequence” structures, consisting of small nucleotide motifs repeatedly present at the beginning and end of each IES (47, 48). Previous researchers have reported that IESs of ciliates can be alternatively excised, with some macronuclear chromosomes having different versions in the same cell (4951). Although we do not have a micronuclear genome sequence for Halteria, we have designed the ADFinder (Accurate Deletion Finder) software that can detect alternative DNA deletion events in ciliates (52) without the support of micronuclear reads.

By mapping all genomic sequencing reads to the macronuclear genome assembly, we inferred 2,172 alternatively excised IESs with pointer-sequence structure using ADFinder (total length is 299,539 bp). These alternatively excised IESs reflect rare and alternative DNA splicing events during the macronuclear genome development. The average length of these IESs is 101 bp (Fig. S4). Chromosomes containing these alternatively excised IES have multiple isoforms (excised version and nonexcised version). Contrary to our expectations, we found that the average copy number of the excised version was 5.7% of that of the nonexcised version, indicating that the latter is the major version of alternatively excised IES. This is similar to the case discovered in Paramecium tetraurelia (49), in which a majority of cryptically excised IESs are not excised. The majority of alternatively excised IES being nonexcised in Halteria reflects the variability of the MAC DNA rather than the contamination of the MIC (micronuclear) DNA, as the latter would have rendered the nonexcised version (the default status of MIC) as the minor form.

FIG S4

Length distribution of 2,172 alternatively excised IESs in the Halteria genome. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.5 MB (493.2KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Among 2,172 cryptically excised IESs, only 370 (17%) are contained in coding regions, suggesting that cryptically excised IESs are enriched in flanking regions (noncoding regions) of nanochromosomes. The major nonexcised versions in coding regions are highly expressed, with the average RNA-seq coverage at 324×. More strikingly, their minor excised versions are also successfully transcribed, with 75% of them having successfully mapped RNA-seq reads (average RNA-seq coverage = 30×, minimal RNA coverage ≥ 3.6×).

Among those IESs retained in coding regions, 227 of 370 (61.3%) are have lengths that are multiples of 3 (3n IESs) (67.8% for IESs inserted between codons) (Table 2), much more than the random expectation of 33.3%, suggesting that cryptically excised IESs in protein-coding regions tend to retain the original reading frame. In support of this idea, 171 of 370 (46%) IESs in coding regions are inserted between codons, and only a small portion (6.4%) would cause premature stops. For those IESs inserted after the first (97 of 370) and second (102 of 370) nucleotides of codons, 24.3% contain in-frame stop codons. This suggests that some cryptically excised IESs may cause premature translation termination, but most IESs retained in coding regions will not disrupt the original open reading frames (ORFs). In contrast, in Paramecium species, cryptically excised IESs are not enriched in coding regions (19% for Paramecium sexaurelia, 28% for Paramecium biaurelia, and 25% for P. tetraurelia) (53). For those cryptically excised IESs in coding regions in Paramecium, their length is not inclined to 3n (26% for P. sexaurelia, 34% for P. biaurelia, and 27% for P. tetraurelia) (53); therefore, the retention of these non-3n IESs will disrupt ORFs and cause premature stops (49, 53, 54).

TABLE 2.

Cryptically excised IESs in protein-coding regions

Parameter IESs between codonsa IESs at frame +1a IESs at frame +2a Total no.
IESs in protein-coding regions 171 97 102 370
IESs without frameshifts 116 58 53 227
IESs with in-frame stop codons 11 49 30 90
a

IESs between codons, cryptically excised IESs inserted between codons; IESs at frame +1, cryptically excised IESs inserted after the first nucleotide of codons; IESs at frame +2, cryptically excised IESs inserted after the second nucleotide of codons.

Intriguingly, cryptically excised IESs have a strong tendency to overlap each other. Among 2,172 IESs, 583 overlap at least one other IES. The overlapped IESs always share a boundary sequence (within IES), and generally have a length difference divisible by three (85.08%). Contig 8469 (a single-gene chromosome) is shown as an example (Fig. 4A). Here, 5 IESs share the same 5′ and 3′ boundary motif (5′: GCTCAAC, 3′: TCAACAG), although they are in different locations. The pointer-sequences of these IESs contain the 3′ boundary motif TCAACAG and can be represented by the motif “N(3–5)GGNTCAACAG” (where N represents A/T/G/C) (48). All length differences between pairs are divisible by three, which means the deletion and retention of any one of them retains the same reading frame (Fig. 4A). Although this alternative IES deletion at the DNA level resembles alternative intron splicing at the RNA level, and may increase the diversity of protein sequences, the functional and evolutionary significance of this is unclear, and the possibility that such variants simply reflect cellular accidents cannot be ruled out.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Large-scale DNA and RNA alternative splicing. (A) Cryptically excised IESs in contig 8469. Repetitive segments (each one is 7 bp) are shown in the same color. The length differences between each pair of jointly used segments are shown beside each segment. (B) Length distribution of introns, using bin size of 2 bp. (C) Patterns of nucleotide usage for the 10-bp segment internal to both ends of introns. (D) Distribution of introns in all single-gene coding chromosomes of Halteria grandinella and Oxytricha trifallax. Window size is 1% of the whole chromosome without two telomeres.

Widespread, low-frequency spliced introns. By mapping all RNA-seq reads to the genome assembly, we inferred 23,188 GT…AG type introns, 0.34 introns per gene on average. Compared with other eukaryotes, Halteria has relatively short introns, 59% of which are between 30 and 40 bp (Fig. 4B), with an average length of 57 bp. The average length of Halteria introns is nonetheless longer than that of Paramecium tetraurelia (25 bp) and Stentor coeruleus (15 bp) (55, 56), which are the shortest reported in any eukaryote (57). The first three nucleotides after GT have an obvious bias toward “AAG,” and the last three nucleotides before AG have a bias to “T(A|T)T” (Fig. 4C).

Halteria has a slight deficit of introns with lengths that are multiples of 3 (here called 3n introns). These 3n introns represent 29.3% of the total, in contrast with 37.9% and 32.8% for 3n + 1 and 3n + 2 introns, respectively. This deficiency of 3n introns in Halteria is less extreme than that in Paramecium tetraurelia; only 18.7% of Paramecium introns are reported as 3n introns, while 42.3% and 39.0% are 3n + 1 and 3n + 2 introns, respectively (55). Paramecium introns with 3n length tend to cause premature translation termination (PTC) in the event of intron retention (59.2%) (55), whereas in Halteria, only 12.8% of 3n introns contain at least one in-frame stop codon. Halteria, and possibly other species with compact genomes, may take advantage of these non-PTC-inducing 3n introns to increase the diversity of coding information.

Composite analysis in 9,060 single-gene coding nanochromosomes of Halteria revealed the positions of introns to be preferentially skewed toward 5′ ends (Fig. 4D). Applying the same analysis to the published genome (GCA_000295675.1) and RNA-seq (SRR578166) data sets of Oxytricha trifallax reveals a similar distribution of intron positions in the two species (Fig. 4D), indicating that 5′ skew of introns may be common in ciliates with nanochromosomes. This distribution may result from different selective pressures on introns at different positions in nanochromosomes. For example, assuming that ciliates have a distance-based mechanism of nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) to selectively degrade prematurely terminated mRNAs, the establishment of the first intron may modify the selective environment of downstream intron colonization events if the first intron already covers a large fraction of the total potential for NMD (58).

In contrast with the limited intron alternative splicing found in Paramecium tetraurelia (where 0.9% of 13,498 introns are alternatively spliced) (55, 59), Halteria exhibit a larger incidence of alternative splicing during transcription, where 3,593 introns (15.5%) overlap at least one other intron in 1,475 genome locations. Of these, 3,130 of 3,593 alternatively spliced introns share a donor (GT) or acceptor (AG) site with at least one other intron, and there is a strong preference for sharing the same donor (GT) rather than acceptor (AG) site.

By analyzing the length difference between pairs of introns sharing the same donor or acceptor site, we found that 66.84% of the additional sequence between two overlapped introns is divisible by three, which is much higher than the random expectation of 33.33%, and the proportion of 3n introns among total introns, which is 29.3%. This implies that the removal of alternatively spliced introns in this species tends to leave the original reading frame intact.

Finally, we quantified the mapped RNA-seq reads for all mRNA isoforms to determine the major isoform (the most abundant spliced variant) in each intron location. On average, the frequency of the minor form is 7.7% of the major form. Again, although this large-scale alternative mRNA splicing, along with alternative IES deletion, may increase the proteomic complexity, it remains unclear whether this is adaptive, maladaptive, or effectively neutral (43, 44).

Transcriptional initiation and termination in tiny chromosomes.

Transcriptional initiation. After removing the telomeres, the 5′ subtelomeric regions of the coding strand of single-gene coding chromosomes, which are potential locations for transcription-start sites, were searched for potential regulatory sequence motifs using the MEME software (60). A conservative 15-bp motif region was discovered in 7,061 of 9,060 (78%) single-gene chromosomes (Fig. 5A and B). This AT-rich motif has an invariant T residue at position +6 and resembles the “TATA box” structure known in other organisms. Of these motifs, 75% are located within 30 bp of the 5′ telomere, the average distance being just 26 bp (Fig. 5C). To determine whether this motif is related to transcription initiation, we mapped RNA-seq reads to all single-gene-coding chromosomes, obtained the mapping boundary of RNA-seq reads to estimate the transcription-start site, and plotted them with the positions of motifs (Fig. 5A). We also plotted the position of the predicted translation start codon in each single-gene chromosome with the position of the TATA box-like motifs (Fig. 5B). As shown in these two figures, the position of this motif is highly correlated with the locations of both the transcription start site and the translation initiation codon. Meanwhile, this motif is not detected in the 3′ region. These results are consistent with our supposition that the motif is more likely to be transcription-initiation related. These TATA box-like motifs may function like transcription-factor-binding sites to initiate transcription.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Transcription initiation and termination in tiny chromosomes. (A) Locations of TATA box-like motif and transcription start site in each of 7,061 single-gene chromosomes measured from the end of the 5′ telomere. On the x axis, from 0 to 7,061, all 7,061 single-gene chromosomes are ordered by decreasing distance of the TATA box like motifs from the telomere. The y axis denotes the position of motifs (black dots, joined as a line) or transcription start sites (green dots); 0 on the y axis represents the 5′ boundary of the chromosome (i.e., the motif is adjacent to the telomere). (B) Locations of TATA box-like motifs and translation start codons in each single-gene chromosome measured from the end of the 5′ telomere, as in Fig. 5A (C). The frequency distributions of positions of translation start codons (blue), transcription start sites (green), and TATA box-like motifs (gray), measured as the distance from the 5′ boundary of chromosomes (telomeres excluded). The dashed lines indicate the mean values. (D) Frequency profile of TATA box-like motifs within the region from −50 to +50 relative to the TSS (0). (E) Sliding-window analysis of AT content of 100-bp 5′ subtelomeric regions of single-gene coding chromosomes separated into four groups (based on the position of the TATA box-like motif and first mapped RNA read). The window size for calculating the AT content is 20 bp. The 0-bp location on the x axis is the 5′ boundary of the chromosome after removing telomeres. Each row represents a chromosome. In each group, chromosomes are ordered by the position of their motifs; the group without a TATA box-like motif is in random order. (F) The frequency distribution of translation stop codons (red) and transcription termination sites (blue), measured as the distance from the 3′ boundary of the chromosome (telomeres excluded). The dashed lines indicate the mean values.

Analysis of the distances between motifs and transcription start sites (TSSs) revealed 88% of them to be <30 bp in length. According to the distance L = PTSS − Pmotif, where PTSS is the position of the TSS, and Pmotif is the position of the start of the motif, the 7,061 chromosomes with a motif are approximately divided into three groups: L < 0 (TSS located upstream of the motif region), 0 ≤ L ≤ 30 (TSS located <30 bp downstream of the motif region), and L > 30 (TSS located >30 bp downstream of the motif) (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Numbers and proportions of orthologs between Haltera grandinella and two other unicellular eukaryotic organisms (Oxytricha trifallax and Tetrahymena thermophila)

Groupa No. Annotated genes Oxytricha trifallax Tetrahymena thermophila TPMb
L > 30 911 0.68 0.53 0.29 5.12
0 ≤ L ≤ 30 3,876 0.78 0.71 0.38 26.74
L < 0 1,959 0.80 0.74 0.43 134.44
No motif 2,002 0.12 0.21 0.05 29.57
a

RNA-seq coverage of four groups of chromosomes. L is the distance between the position of motifs (Pmotif) and the inferred position of transcriptional start sites (PTSS), defined by L = PTSS − Pmotif. No motif indicates the absence of an obvious TATA box-like motif in the nanochromosome.

b

TPM, transcripts per million.

The L > 30 group has the lowest RNA-seq coverage in Halteria, which is consistent with the high PTSS value for this group being potentially biased upward due to low expression, resulting in deficient read mapping, i.e., the PTSS value in the L > 30 group may not reflect real transcription start sites. Notably, a relatively small fraction of the genes in the L > 30 group have orthologs in other ciliates (Oxytricha trifallax and Tetrahymena thermophila) (compared with the L < 0 and 0 ≤ L ≤ 30 groups), suggesting that the nonconserved genes tend to have lower expression levels (Table 3). In contrast, the group L < 0 had the highest RNA-seq coverage and proportion of phylogenetically conserved genes. The group 0 ≤ L ≤ 30 and the group without motifs have similar RNA-seq coverage, near the average level of transcripts per million (TPM) for all chromosomes, suggesting that even though the conserved TATA box-like motif observed in most chromosomes is related to transcription initiation, it is not essential for transcription. The group without motifs had the lowest proportion of orthologs and functionally annotated genes, suggesting that chromosomes without this TATA box-like motif may harbor genes specific to Halteria.

The group 0 ≤ L ≤ 30 (3,876 chromosomes) was selected for further analysis of the locations of the TSSs, TATA box-like motifs, and translation start codons. As shown in Fig. 5C, the TATA box-like motifs start on average at 26 bp after the 5′ telomere, with the TSSs starting on average at 17 bp downstream of the motifs and translation start codons on average at 18 bp downstream of TSSs, indicating an average 5′ UTR of only ∼18 bp in length. Compared with TATA boxes of other reported eukaryotes, those in the Halteria genome distribute in a narrow area and much closer to TSSs (−25 to −13 bp, Fig. 5D). In the model unicellular yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, TATA boxes mainly distribute between −120 and −40 bp relative to TSSs (61). In humans, where the sizes of intergenic regions are expanded greatly, the distribution of TATA boxes is even wider, from −1,000 to +1,000 bp relative to TSSs (61). The extremely short chromosomes of Halteria greatly limit the distribution of TATA boxes, but still the regular relative spatial distribution is striking.

To further investigate transcript structures and detect potential TATA box regions, we conducted a sliding-window analysis of the A/T composition in all 100-bp 5′ subtelomeric regions (Fig. 5E). Compared with chromosomes with a clear TATA box region, the chromosomes without motifs still possess AT-rich regions with lengths of <25 bp and distributed in similar positions as typical motif regions, suggesting that these Halteria-specific genes may be in the evolutionary process of forming or losing a stable TATA box. Based on previous research of anomalous base compositions in subtelomeric regions of Oxytricha (62), the high AT composition may also act as a target for proteins responsible for excision of micronuclear sequence. By creating a differential chromatin structure along micronuclear DNA, the high AT composition might affect DNA structure to produce a specific excision target during the formation of the macronuclear genome.

Transcription termination. The RNA-seq reads mapped to all single-gene-coding chromosomes were also used to obtain the position of the last mapped RNA-seq read, revealing a simple pattern for the termination of transcription (Fig. 5F); 34% of chromosomes terminate transcription at the last nucleotide before the telomere, and 75% within the last 25 bp before telomeres. The mean value of the position of a transcription termination site is 14 bp before telomeres. This suggests that transcription termination in single-gene chromosomes of Halteria may simply occur when the RNA polymerase reaches the ends of nanochromosomes. Most stop codons located at 63 bp before telomeres, indicating a mean 3′ UTR length of ∼49 bp (Fig. 5F). Unlike the 5′ UTR, no conserved motif was identified in the 3′ UTR region. On average, the 3′ UTR is longer than the 5′ UTR and has a higher length variation (standard deviation of 25 bp versus 19 bp) (Fig. S5), which may be attributable to the simple pattern of transcriptional termination.

In conclusion, the polyploid macronuclear genome of Halteria closely parallels the transcriptome, comprising ∼23,000 haploid gene-sized nanochromosomes, the longest and the shortest being 74,042 bp and 345 bp, respectively. The macronuclear copy numbers of nanochromosomes are nonuniform and correlate with gene expression levels, implying a potential connection between the chromosomal copy number and the level of transcription, although the functional significance of this correlation remains unclear. Further analyses combining genomic and transcriptomic data sets indicated that large-scale alternative deletions occur during macronuclear formation (IES deletion) and transcription (intron deletion). These alternative deletions may produce functional gene products, but may also simply reflect erroneous splicing. Finally, the analyses of transcriptional initiation/termination of nanochromosomes reveal conserved TATA box-like motifs and short untranslated regions (∼10 bp) in the 5′ subtelomeric regions, and extremely compact untranslated 3′ regions (∼49 bp). The mean UTR lengths of Halteria resemble those reported in Oxytricha trifallax (20), making the gene structures in Halteria and Oxytricha the most compact known among eukaryotes.

FIG S5

Length distribution of the 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR in nanochromosomes. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.4 MB (391.8KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell isolation and culture.

A Halteria grandinella cell was isolated from a freshwater pond in Baihuayuan Park (36°04’N, 120°22’E), Qingdao, China, and was identified by its morphological features and small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (SSU-rRNA) gene sequence. A single cell was picked, washed, and cultivated in cell culture flasks with filtered and autoclaved pond water. All downstream experiments, including DNA and RNA extractions, were based on clones produced by asexual reproduction of this clone-founding cell. Escherichia coli strain DH5α was applied as the food source. The ciliate culture for DNA and RNA extraction was cultivated for 7 days at 23°C.

DNA extraction, RNA extraction, and Illumina sequencing.

Before the DNA and RNA extraction, cells were starved for 2 days and ampicillin was added to reduce contamination by E. coli and other bacteria. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 300 × g for 5 min. DNA was extracted using phenol chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. RNA extraction was performed with the RNeasy Plus minikit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

The DNA library was constructed with NEBNext DNA library prep master mix set for Illumina (New England BioLabs [NEB], USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. High-throughput sequencing was performed on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform. The paired-end sequencing produced 20G of clean data after quality control and removing adapters (read length: 150 bp).

The RNA libraries were generated using NEBNext Ultra RNA library prep kit for Illumina (NEB, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Four RNA-seq replicates were sequenced. High-throughput sequencing was performed on Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform and produced 10G of clean data for each RNA library after quality control and removing adapters (read length: 150 bp).

Genome assembly.

Raw sequencing reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic with the following parameter: “ILLUMINACLIP:adapter_path:2:30:10 LEADING:10 TRAILING:10 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20” (63). The genome assembly was performed with a combination of the SPAdes and MaSuRCA assemblers (64, 65). The MaSuRCA assembler was run with the default parameters. The super-reads output file from the MaSuRCA assembler was applied to the SPAdes assembler as reference. The SPAdes assembler was run with the following parameters: -k 21,33,55,77 –careful –trusted-contigs <super-reads file>. SPAdes software generated 52,353 contigs. The output contigs from SPAdes were split into three files (0/1/2-telomere) according to the number of telomeres. Contigs containing Halteria telomere are considered high-quality and were retained without contamination filtering. Contigs without telomeres were filtered based on the GC content. Contigs with GC content higher than 60% were considered contamination and were removed. Contigs with no telomeres, low sequencing coverage (coverage < 2×), and lengths < 500 bp were considered low quality, and were removed.

Fifty thousand randomly selected bacterial genomes downloaded from the NCBI database were used as the target database. The filtered genome assembly was split into 426,052 150-bp-long fragments and aligned with the target database. No fragment was mapped to the bacterial database, indicating that this genome assembly does not contain chimeric contigs resulting from false recombination between Halteria and bacterial genome.

The micronuclear (MIC) sequence contamination was estimated by checking the sequencing coverage of all sites using RSEM software (66). Genomic regions with less than 5% sequencing coverage of its adjacent regions were considered MIC contamination and removed. No such region was detected in the final assembly.

QUAST was used to obtain the GC content, N50, and other genomic statistics (67). RSEM software, which is based on bowtie2, was used in the calculation of sequencing depth of each contig (66).

Gene prediction and annotation.

The RNA-seq reads and genome contigs were aligned using Tophat2 to predict introns (68). Before gene prediction, all introns were removed from the genomic contigs. After removing introns, intron-free contigs were aligned with the Swiss-Prot database using blastx (E value = 1e−5, querygenecode = 6) to identify genes in our assembly (30). A perl script “blast_xml_protein_coding_sequence_extract_v2.pl” (supplemental material appendix, Code S3) was used to analyze the “.xml” output file of blastx (using contigs of the Halteria genome as the query and Swiss-Prot as the target database). In this script, all matched genes in the Swiss-Prot database for each query (contigs of Halteria genome) were identified and extracted by searching for the start and stop codons of the longest potential open reading frame. The output file of this script was used in the model training of AUGUSTUS software. Detailed functional information of each gene was obtained using a perl script “entrez_information_extract.pl” (supplemental material appendix, Code S4).

The de novo gene prediction was performed using AUGUSTUS (version 2.5.5) (69). The AUGUSTUS gene model of Halteria was trained using the original genome assembly and genes models predicted by Code S3. In the model training of AUGUSTUS software, 5,000 genes generated by Code S3 were randomly picked as the training data set. Training of the gene prediction model was repeated 19 times until the sensitivity and specificity stabilized at the highest level (89% and 66% at nucleotide level, 62% and 51% at exon level, and 42% and 41% at gene level, respectively). In the file containing parameters, the conventional TAA and TAG codons were modified to encode glutamine instead of the translation stop codon, as in other hypotrichous ciliates (Oxytricha and Stylonchyia) (70). Because the default minimum intron length of AUGUSTUS is too long for ciliates, the parameter <min_intron_len> in the source code file <type.cc> in AUGUSTUS was modified from 39 to 15 to recompile the software. RNA-seq reads were assembled into transcripts using rnaSPAdes (71). These transcripts were then aligned with the genome assembly by BLAT to produce the “hints” file for AUGUSTUS gene prediction (72). The predicting result of AUGUSTUS was filtered to discard the genes without start and stop codons using a perl script “gff_analysis.pl” (supplemental material appendix, Code S5). The remaining protein-coding genes predicted by AUGUSTUS were aligned with the Swiss-Prot database to add functional information (73).

The de novo predicted genes based on AUGUSTUS and predicted genes based on the Swiss-Prot database were combined to form the final result of gene predictions. Another perl script “combine_database_and_denovo_annotation.pl” (supplemental material appendix, Code S6) was designed to unite the genes predicted by the Swiss-Prot database and by AUGUSTUS. For the genes shared by both predictions, those predicted by the Swiss-Prot database were retained in the final prediction file. The alignment between all predicted genes and the COG (Clusters of Orthologous Genes) database was performed using blastx method with default parameters (74).

Polymorphic sites detection.

The fastq file of genomic sequencing was aligned with the genome assembly using bowtie2 (31). Samtools was used for converting sam to bam files and for generating the Mpileup file (75). Mapgd was used for converting the Mpileup file into quartet sets of reads which comprised numbers of observed As, Cs, Gs, and Ts at each site (76). The analyses of minor allele frequency and other parameters were performed using a perl script “pool_population_analysis.pl” (supplemental material appendix, Code S7). Zero-fold redundant sites are those nucleotides at which all changes are nonsynonymous.

Alternatively spliced IES detection.

The software ADFinder was designed to filter the paired-end reads, align reads with genome assembly, and analyze the resulting alignment (unpublished software). This software is written in python and utilizes the bowtie2 software (–local, -k 5, –ma 3) in read alignments. The local mode of bowtie2 allows each read to align with the reference genome with a soft clip (alignments might be “trimmed” to optimize the alignment score). In the output file of bowtie2 software, the CIGAR field of soft-clipped reads is shown in the format “110M40S” (“110 matches + 40 mismatches”) or “110S40M” (“110 mismatches + 40 matches”), suggesting that this read is partially mapped. This kind of partially mapped read is essential in identifying the splicing event in the reference genome. Then, soft-clipped reads in alignments were used to generate the splice sites. If one read was mapped as a soft-clipped read at two or more different genomic locations, all matching records of this single read were analyzed. For example, if a read was matched to a contig at the xth nucleotide with the CIGAR field “110M40S.” and this read was also mapped to the same contig for the second time at the yth nucleotide with the CIGAR field “110S40M,” then the DNA sequence between x + 110 and y bp was regarded as a deletion event. Some fully mapped internal-broken reads which are end-to-end matched but contain a small deletion fragment may also be used to identify small deletion events. The CIGAR field of internal-broken read is shown in the format “50M20D80M” (“50 matches + 20 deletions + 80 matches”). For these internal-broken reads, each can simply signify a splicing event. The core code of ADFinder was attached in our source code list (supplemental material appendix, Code S2). The detailed description, purpose, and usage of ADFinder is shown in our GitHub webpage (https://github.com/weibozheng/ADFinder). The RNA and DNA sequencing coverage of each splicing site was determined by mapping reads with recombined segments produced by the following methods. The “excised” version (with the IES deleted) was inferred by the conjoining within genomic sequence of the 125-bp 5′ upstream and 125-bp 3′ downstream region of the IES. The “nonexcised” version was inferred in two ways according to the length of IES: (i) if the presumed IES length x was <250 bp, then (250 − x)/2 bp 5′ upstream, x bp IES, and (250 − x)/2 bp 3′ downstream regions were combined as indicators of the “nonexcised” version (with the IES retained); and (ii) if the IES length x was >250 bp, the IES itself was treated as an indicator of the “nonexcised” version. The schematic plot of the above description is shown in Fig. S6.

FIG S6

Schematic plot of spliced/nonspliced versions of a genomic location containing an alternative IES splicing event. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.4 MB (441.3KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Transcriptional initiation analysis.

The motif searching software MEME was used for searching the motifs in 400-bp 5′ subtelomeric regions (60). Bowtie2 was used in read-mapping between all RNA-seq reads and single-gene chromosomes (31). Samtools was used for filtering and sorting the mapping results produced by Bowtie2 (75). The sorted *.sam files produced by Samtools were applied to a perl script “get_trans_ini_termi.pl” (supplemental material appendix, Code S8) to extract the positions of potential transcriptional initiation and termination sites in each chromosome. The search for homologous genes between Halteria grandinella and two other ciliates (Oxytricha trifallax and Tetrahymena thermophila) was conducted by blastx using protein identity > 30% and overlap region > 60% as criteria.

Data and source code availability.

The final genome assembly, genomic reads, and RNA-seq reads have been deposited in GenBank (genome assembly: RRYP01000000, genomic reads: SRX5087334, RNA-seq reads: SRX5097405, SRX5097406, SRX5097407, and SRX5097408). All source codes in our research are available in this GitHub webpage: https://github.com/weibozheng/Halteria_genome_research.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financially supported by the Marine S&T Fund of Shandong Province for Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) (2018SDKJ0406-2 to S.G.), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (201841005 to S.G.), Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province (S.G.), National Institutes of Health (R35-GM122566-01 to M.L.), and the National Science Foundation (MCB-1518060 and DEB-1927159 to M.L.).

Our special thanks are given to Weibo Song (Ocean University of China [OUC]) and Alan Warren (Natural History Museum) for the helpful suggestions during drafting the manuscript. We thank Wen Song (OUC) for her kind help with species identification and Thomas G. Doak (Indiana University) for providing computing resources.

We declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Citation Zheng W, Wang C, Lynch M, Gao S. 2021. The compact macronuclear genome of the ciliate Halteria grandinella: a transcriptome-like genome with 23,000 nanochromosomes. mBio 12:e01964-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01964-20.

Contributor Information

Laura A. Katz, Smith College.

Douglas G. Capone, University of Southern California.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chen X, Jiang Y, Gao F, Zheng W, Krock TJ, Stover NA, Lu C, Katz LA, Song W. 2019. Genome analyses of the new model protist Euplotes vannus focusing on genome rearrangement and resistance to environmental stressors. Mol Ecol Resour 19:1292–1308. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Karrer KM 2012. Nuclear dualism. Methods Cell Biol 109:29–52. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385967-9.00003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yan Y, Maurer-Alcalá XX, Knight R, Pond SLK, Katz LA. 2019. Single-cell transcriptomics reveal a correlation between genome architecture and gene family evolution in ciliates. mBio 10:e02524-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02524-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sheng Y, Duan L, Cheng T, Qiao Y, Stover NA, Gao S. 2020. The completed macronuclear genome of a model ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila and its application in genome scrambling and copy number analyses. Sci China Life Sci 63:1534–1542. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1689-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu J, Li X, Song W, Wang W, Gao S. 2019. Cyclin Cyc2p is required for micronuclear bouquet formation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Sci China Life Sci 62:668–680. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9369-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zheng W, Wang C, Yan Y, Gao F, Doak TG, Song W. 2018. Insights into an extensively fragmented eukaryotic genome: de novo genome sequencing of the multinuclear ciliate Uroleptopsis citrina. Genome Biol Evol 10:883–894. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang Y, Wang C, Jiang Y, Katz LA, Gao F, Yan Y. 2019. Further analyses of variation of ribosome DNA copy number and polymorphism in ciliates provide insights relevant to studies of both molecular ecology and phylogeny. Sci China Life Sci 62:203–214. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9422-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Y, Sheng Y, Liu Y, Zhang W, Cheng T, Duan L, Pan B, Qiao Y, Liu Y, Gao S. 2019. A distinct class of eukaryotic MT-A70 methyltransferases maintain symmetric DNA N6-adenine methylation at the ApT dinucleotides as an epigenetic mark associated with transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 47:11771–11789. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kruger K, Grabowski PJ, Zaug AJ, Sands J, Gottschling DE, Cech TR. 1982. Self-splicing RNA: autoexcision and autocyclization of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of Tetrahymena. Cell 31:147–157. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90414-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fang G, Cech TR. 1993. The β subunit of Oxytricha telomere-binding protein promotes G-quartet formation by telomeric DNA. Cell 74:875–885. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90467-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Allis CD, Chicoine LG, Richman R, Schulman IG. 1985. Deposition-related histone acetylation in micronuclei of conjugating Tetrahymena. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:8048–8052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.23.8048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Petz W, Foissner W. 1992. Morphology and morphogenesis of Strobilidium caudatum (Fromentel), Meseres corlissi n. sp., Halteria grandinella (Müller), and Strombidium rehwaldi n. sp., and a proposed phylogenetic system for oligotrich ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora). J Eukaryot Microbiol 39:159–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1992.tb01296.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ueyama S, Katsumaru H, Suzaki T, Nakaoka Y. 2005. Halteria grandinella: a rapid swimming ciliate with a high frequency of ciliary beating. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 60:214–221. doi: 10.1002/cm.20056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Archbold JH, Berger J. 1985. A qualitative assessment of some metazoan predators of Halteria grandinella, a common freshwater ciliate. Hydrobiologia 126:97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00008675. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gilbert J 1994. Jumping behavior in the oligotrich ciliates Strobilidium velox and Halteria grandinella, and its significance as a defense against rotifer predators. Microb Ecol 27:189–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00165817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baroin-Tourancheau A, Delgado P, Perasso R, Adoutte A. 1992. A broad molecular phylogeny of ciliates: identification of major evolutionary trends and radiations within the phylum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:9764–9768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coyne RS, Stover N, Miao W. 2012. Whole genome studies of Tetrahymena, p 53–81, In Methods in cell biology, vol 109 Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eisen JA, Coyne RS, Wu M, Wu D, Thiagarajan M, Wortman JR, Badger JH, Ren Q, Amedeo P, Jones KM, Tallon LJ, Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Silva JC, Haas BJ, Majoros WH, Farzad M, Carlton JM, Smith RK, Garg J, Pearlman RE, Karrer KM, Sun L, Manning G, Elde NC, Turkewitz AP, Asai DJ, Wilkes DE, Wang Y, Cai H, Collins K, Stewart BA, Lee SR, Wilamowska K, Weinberg Z, Ruzzo WL, Wloga D, Gaertig J, Frankel J, Tsao C-C, Gorovsky MA, Keeling PJ, Waller RF, Patron NJ, Cherry JM, Stover NA, Krieger CJ, del Toro C, Ryder HF, Williamson SC, et al. 2006. Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLoS Biol 4:e286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aury J-M, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, Porcel BM, Ségurens B, Daubin V, Anthouard V, Aiach N, Arnaiz O, Billaut A, Beisson J, Blanc I, Bouhouche K, Câmara F, Duharcourt S, Guigo R, Gogendeau D, Katinka M, Keller A-M, Kissmehl R, Klotz C, Koll F, Le Mouël A, Lepère G, Malinsky S, Nowacki M, Nowak JK, Plattner H, Poulain J, Ruiz F, Serrano V, Zagulski M, Dessen P, Bétermier M, Weissenbach J, Scarpelli C, Schächter V, Sperling L, Meyer E, Cohen J, Wincker P. 2006. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444:171–178. doi: 10.1038/nature05230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Swart EC, Bracht JR, Magrini V, Minx P, Chen X, Zhou Y, Khurana JS, Goldman AD, Nowacki M, Schotanus K, Jung S, Fulton RS, Ly A, McGrath S, Haub K, Wiggins JL, Storton D, Matese JC, Parsons L, Chang W-J, Bowen MS, Stover NA, Jones TA, Eddy SR, Herrick GA, Doak TG, Wilson RK, Mardis ER, Landweber LF. 2013. The Oxytricha trifallax macronuclear genome: a complex eukaryotic genome with 16,000 tiny chromosomes. PLoS Biol 11:e1001473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beh LY, Debelouchina GT, Clay DM, Thompson RE, Lindblad KA, Hutton ER, Bracht JR, Sebra RP, Muir TW, Landweber LF. 2019. Identification of a DNA N6-Adenine methyltransferase complex and its impact on chromatin organization. Cell 177:1781–1796. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lynch M, Xu S, Maruki T, Jiang X, Pfaffelhuber P, Haubold B. 2014. Genome-wide linkage-disequilibrium profiles from single individuals. Genetics 198:269–281. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.166843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Smale ST, Kadonaga JT. 2003. The RNA polymerase II core promoter. Annu Rev Biochem 72:449–479. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levine M, Tjian R. 2003. Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 424:147–151. doi: 10.1038/nature01763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aeschlimann SH, Jonsson F, Postberg J, Stover NA, Petera RL, Lipps HJ, Nowacki M, Swart EC. 2014. The draft assembly of the radically organized Stylonychia lemnae macronuclear genome. Genome Biol Evol 6:1707–1723. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ricard G, de Graaf RM, Dutilh BE, Duarte I, van Alen TA, van Hoek AH, Boxma B, van der Staay GWM, Moon-van der Staay SY, Chang W-J, Landweber LF, Hackstein JHP, Huynen MA. 2008. Macronuclear genome structure of the ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis: single-gene chromosomes and tiny introns. BMC Genomics 9:587. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang R-l, Miao W, Wang W, Xiong J, Liang A-h. 2018. EOGD: the Euplotes octocarinatus genome database. BMC Genomics 19:63. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4445-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen X, Jung S, Beh LY, Eddy SR, Landweber LF. 2015. Combinatorial DNA rearrangement facilitates the origin of new genes in ciliates. Genome Biol Evol 7:2859–2870. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arnaiz O, Sperling L. 2011. ParameciumDB in 2011: new tools and new data for functional and comparative genomics of the model ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D632–D636. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2008. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W5–W9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bang ML, Centner T, Fornoff F, Geach AJ, Gotthardt M, McNabb M, Witt CC, Labeit D, Gregorio CC, Granzier H, Labeit S. 2001. The complete gene sequence of titin, expression of an unusual 700-kDa titin isoform, and its interaction with obscurin identify a novel Z-line to I-band linking system. Circ Res 89:1065–1072. doi: 10.1161/hh2301.100981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cavalcanti AR, Stover NA, Orecchia L, Doak TG, Landweber LF. 2004. Coding properties of Oxytricha trifallax (Sterkiella histriomuscorum) macronuclear chromosomes: analysis of a pilot genome project. Chromosoma 113:69–76. doi: 10.1007/s00412-004-0295-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Frank A, Lobry J. 1999. Asymmetric substitution patterns: a review of possible underlying mutational or selective mechanisms. Gene 238:65–77. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zaychikov E, Denissova L, Meier T, Götte M, Heumann H. 1997. Influence of Mg2+ and temperature on formation of the transcription bubble. J Biol Chem 272:2259–2267. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pachter L 2011. Models for transcript quantification from RNA-Seq. arXiv 1104.3889.
  • 37.Bétermier M 2004. Large-scale genome remodelling by the developmentally programmed elimination of germ line sequences in the ciliate Paramecium. Res Microbiol 155:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khurana JS, Clay D, Moreira S, Wang X, Landweber LF. 2018. Small RNA-mediated regulation of DNA dosage in the ciliate Oxytricha. RNA 24:18–29. doi: 10.1261/rna.061333.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Preer JR 1976. Quantitative predictions of random segregation models of the ciliate macronucleus. Genet Res 27:227–238. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300016426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kimura M 1957. Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann Math Statist 28:882–901. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Duerr HP, Eichner M, Ammermann D. 2004. Modeling senescence in hypotrichous ciliates. Protist 155:45–52. doi: 10.1078/1434461000163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Baird SE, Klobutcher LA. 1991. Differential DNA amplification and copy number control in the hypotrichous ciliate Euplotes crassus. J Protozool 38:136–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1991.tb06033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zufall RA, McGrath CL, Muse SV, Katz LA. 2006. Genome architecture drives protein evolution in ciliates. Mol Biol Evol 23:1681–1687. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maurer-Alcalá XX, Yan Y, Pilling OA, Rob K, Katz LA. 2018. Twisted tales: insights into genome diversity of ciliates using single-cell 'omics. Genome Biol Evol 10:1927–1939. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bell G, Graham B. 1988. Sex and death in Protozoa: the history of obsession. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Prescott DM, Ehrenfeucht A, Rozenberg G. 2003. Template-guided recombination for IES elimination and unscrambling of genes in stichotrichous ciliates. J Theor Biol 222:323–330. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cavalcanti AR, Clarke TH, Landweber LF. 2005. MDS_IES_DB: a database of macronuclear and micronuclear genes in spirotrichous ciliates. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D396–D398. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Burns J, Kukushkin D, Lindblad K, Chen X, Jonoska N, Landweber LF. 2016. MDS_IES_DB: a database of ciliate genome rearrangements. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D703–D709. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Duret L, Cohen J, Jubin C, Dessen P, Goût J-F, Mousset S, Aury J-M, Jaillon O, Noël B, Arnaiz O, Bétermier M, Wincker P, Meyer E, Sperling L. 2008. Analysis of sequence variability in the macronuclear DNA of Paramecium tetraurelia: a somatic view of the germline. Genome Res 18:585–596. doi: 10.1101/gr.074534.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Katz LA, Kovner AM. 2010. Alternative processing of scrambled genes generates protein diversity in the ciliate Chilodonella uncinata. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 314:480–488. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gao F, Roy SW, Katz LA. 2015. Analyses of alternatively processed genes in ciliates provide insights into the origins of scrambled genomes and may provide a mechanism for speciation. mBio 6:e01998-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01998-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zheng W, Chen J, Doak TG, Song W, Yan Y. 2020. ADFinder: accurate detection of programmed DNA elimination using NGS high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 36:3632–3636. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Catania F, McGrath CL, Doak TG, Lynch M. 2013. Spliced DNA sequences in the Paramecium germline: their properties and evolutionary potential. Genome Biol Evol 5:1200–1211. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vitali V, Hagen R, Catania F. 2019. Environmentally induced plasticity of programmed DNA elimination boosts somatic variability in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genome Res 29:1693–1704. doi: 10.1101/gr.245332.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jaillon O, Bouhouche K, Gout J-F, Aury J-M, Noel B, Saudemont B, Nowacki M, Serrano V, Porcel BM, Ségurens B, Le Mouël A, Lepère G, Schächter V, Bétermier M, Cohen J, Wincker P, Sperling L, Duret L, Meyer E. 2008. Translational control of intron splicing in eukaryotes. Nature 451:359–362. doi: 10.1038/nature06495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Slabodnick MM, Ruby JG, Reiff SB, Swart EC, Gosai S, Prabakaran S, Witkowska E, Larue GE, Fisher S, Freeman RM, Gunawardena J, Chu W, Stover NA, Gregory BD, Nowacki M, Derisi J, Roy SW, Marshall WF, Sood P. 2017. The macronuclear genome of Stentor coeruleus reveals tiny introns in a giant cell. Curr Biol 27:569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Russell CB, Fraga D, Hinrichsen RD. 1994. Extremely short 20–33 nucleotide introns are the standard length in Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res 22:1221–1225. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.7.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lynch M, Kewalramani A. 2003. Messenger RNA surveillance and the evolutionary proliferation of introns. Mol Biol Evol 20:563–571. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Saudemont B, Popa A, Parmley JL, Rocher V, Blugeon C, Necsulea A, Meyer E, Duret L. 2017. The fitness cost of mis-splicing is the main determinant of alternative splicing patterns. Genome Biol 18:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1344-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W202–W208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yang C, Bolotin E, Jiang T, Sladek FM, Martinez E. 2007. Prevalence of the initiator over the TATA box in human and yeast genes and identification of DNA motifs enriched in human TATA-less core promoters. Gene 389:52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Prescott DM, Dizick SJ. 2000. A unique pattern of intrastrand anomalies in base composition of the DNA in hypotrichs. Nucleic Acids Res 28:4679–4688. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.23.4679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zimin AV, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA. 2013. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li B, Dewey CN. 2011. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. 2013. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. 2008. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24:637–644. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Swart EC, Serra V, Petroni G, Nowacki M. 2016. Genetic codes with no dedicated stop codon: context-dependent translation termination. Cell 166:691–702. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bushmanova E, Antipov D, Lapidus A, Przhibelskiy AD. 2018. rnaSPAdes: a de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data. Gigascience 8:giz100. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kent WJ 2002. BLAT—the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 12:656–664. doi: 10.1101/gr.229202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter M-C, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, Pilbout S, Schneider M. 2003. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 31:365–370. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Galperin MY, Kristensen DM, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2019. Microbial genome analysis: the COG approach. Brief Bioinform 20:1063–1070. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lynch M, Bost D, Wilson S, Maruki T, Harrison S. 2014. Population-genetic inference from pooled-sequencing data. Genome Biol Evol 6:1210–1218. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wang R, Xiong J, Wang W, Miao W, Liang A. 2016. High frequency of +1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting in Euplotes octocarinatus. Sci Rep 6:21139. doi: 10.1038/srep21139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Coyne RS, Thiagarajan M, Jones KM, Wortman JR, Tallon LJ, Haas BJ, Cassidy-Hanley DM, Wiley EA, Smith JJ, Collins K, Lee SR, Couvillion MT, Liu Y, Garg J, Pearlman RE, Hamilton EP, Orias E, Eisen JA, Methé BA. 2008. Refined annotation and assembly of the Tetrahymena thermophila genome sequence through EST analysis, comparative genomic hybridization, and targeted gap closure. BMC Genomics 9:562. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Coyne RS, Hannick L, Shanmugam D, Hostetler JB, Brami D, Joardar VS, Johnson J, Radune D, Singh I, Badger JH, Kumar U, Saier M, Wang Y, Cai H, Gu J, Mather MW, Vaidya AB, Wilkes DE, Rajagopalan V, Asai DJ, Pearson CG, Findly RC, Dickerson HW, Wu M, Martens C, Van de Peer Y, Roos DS, Cassidy-Hanley DM, Clark TG. 2011. Comparative genomics of the pathogenic ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, its free-living relatives and a host species provide insights into adoption of a parasitic lifestyle and prospects for disease control. Genome Biol 12:R100. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, Hyman RW, Carlton JM, Pain A, Nelson KE, Bowman S, Paulsen IT, James K, Eisen JA, Rutherford K, Salzberg SL, Craig A, Kyes S, Chan M-S, Nene V, Shallom SJ, Suh B, Peterson J, Angiuoli S, Pertea M, Allen J, Selengut J, Haft D, Mather MW, Vaidya AB, Martin DMA, Fairlamb AH, Fraunholz MJ, Roos DS, Ralph SA, McFadden GI, Cummings LM, Subramanian GM, Mungall C, Venter JC, Carucci DJ, Hoffman SL, Newbold C, Davis RW, Fraser CM, Barrell B. 2002. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419:498–511. doi: 10.1038/nature01097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

The distribution of numbers of genes in gene-coding chromosomes (2-telomere contigs). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.2 MB (1.3MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Shannon entropy (H) composition of each nucleotide for the first 200 positions of all single-gene coding chromosomes. (A) All chromosomes. (B) Chromosomes with blast hits in the forward direction. (C) Chromosomes with blast hits in the reverse direction. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.3 MB (1.3MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Copy number and number of genes successfully matched to COG database. Each bin contains 280 genes. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.3 MB (321KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Length distribution of 2,172 alternatively excised IESs in the Halteria genome. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.5 MB (493.2KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Length distribution of the 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR in nanochromosomes. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.4 MB (391.8KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Schematic plot of spliced/nonspliced versions of a genomic location containing an alternative IES splicing event. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.4 MB (441.3KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2021 Zheng et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES