Skip to main content
Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering logoLink to Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering
. 2021 Feb 1;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2001-1051

Investigation the Effect of Low, Medium and High Dose of X-Radiation on the Expression of E-cadherin in Colorectal Cancer Cell Line

Soleymanifard Sh 1, Rostamyari M 2, B Rassouli F 3, Mehdizadeh A R 4*
PMCID: PMC7859375  PMID: 33564634

Abstract

Background:

Radiotherapy has become a part of therapeutic process of more than 50 percent of patients suffering from cancer. However, recent studies have shown that radiation therapy might affect the expression of adhesive molecule related genes such as E-cadherin and cause cancer cells to move and migrate. Besides, various studies have reported that the expression of E-cadherin changes differently after radiation treatment. There are several studies which showed the loss of E-cadherin function after radiation; however, this reduction has not been observed in others.

Objective:

This study aims to investigate the effect of different radiation doses of X-ray on changes that might occur in the expression of E-cadherin gene in colorectal cancer cell line HT-29.

Material and Methods:

In this experimental study, the cells cultured in flasks were irradiated with X- rays in different doses, including 0.1, 2.5, 5, and 10 Gy; then, the expression of E-cadherin gene was measured using real-time PCR.

Results:

The expression of E-cadherin did not change significantly in post-irradiated HT-29 cell line after different radiation doses of X-ray.

Conclusion:

The results showed that low, medium and high doses of X- radiation did not change the expression of E-cadherin gene in HT-29 cancer cells. However, it has been reported that radiation mostly downregulated the expression of E-cadherin and mediated metastasis formation and invasiveness in different cancer cell lines. Therefore, further studies need to be conducted to investigate the effects of radiation dose on the molecular pathways contributing to regulation of E-cadherin in HT-29 cell line.

Keywords: Radiation, Colorectal Cancer, E-cadherin, Real-Time PCR, X-Rays, Radiation Dosage

Introduction

Radiation therapy has become a part of therapeutic process of more than 50 percent of patients suffering from cancer [ 1 , 2 ]. However, according to recent clinical and experimental studies, ionizing radiation might induce invasion and enhance metastasis potential in cancer cells [ 3 - 8 ]. One possible mechanism for cancer cells to acquire invasive feature and metastasis potential is loss of cell-cell adhesion and cell-extracellular matrix interaction [ 9 - 11 ]. Adhesion molecules, which mediates the interaction between cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix, have a central role in different physiological and also pathological mechanisms [ 9 ]. A calcium-dependent adhesion molecule, E-cadherin, mediates Ca2+-dependent hemophilic interaction which is essential for establishment and maintenance of different junctional structures, including tight junctions, adherent-type junctions and desmosomes. These junctions are crucial for epithelial cells to interconnect [ 12 , 13 ]. According to different studies, E-cadherin’s adhesion function is lost during the most epithelial cancers, including colon, prostate, esophagus, kidney, breast, skin, liver and lung [ 10 , 13 ]. Decreased E-cadherin function in cancer cells correlates with de-differentiation, tumor development, invasion and metastasis [ 13 ]. Besides, loss of epithelial markers, including E-cadherin, might induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) which causes a pro-metastatic properties and promotes stem-like phenotype in cancer cells [ 14 , 15 ]. The possible mechanisms explaining the reduction of E-cadherin expression in cancer cells are: mutation of E-cadherin gene, chromatin rearrangements, hypermethylation and loss of trans-factor binding [ 10 , 13 , 16 ]. Moreover, recent studies have shown that radiation therapy might reduce E-cadherin gene and cause cancer cells to move and migrate. However, as summarized in Table 1, various studies have reported that the expression of E-cadherin changes differently after radiation treatment. There are several studies which claimed the loss of E-cadherin function after radiation therapy was followed by EMT transition, metastasis and cancer stem cell induction in residual cancer cells; however, this reduction has not been observed in others [ 3 , 17 - 22 ]. Various radiation process, accumulative dose, dose rate might lead to this discrepancy. Owing to this difference, the present study aims to investigate the effect of different radiation doses on changes occurring in the expression of E-cadherin gene in colorectal cancer cell line HT-29.

Table 1.

Expression of E-cadherin gene in different Post-irradiated cells with various doses of X-ray

Cell line / Tissue Origin Radiation Dose Rate Assay E-cadherin expression Ref.
A549 Human Lung Cancer X-ray (2-15 Gy) 0.98 Gy/min 0.98 Gy/min Immunoblot [17]
T-Scc Human squamous cell Carcinoma X-ray (2-10 Gy) 0.98 Gy/min Immunoblot [18]
A549 Human Lung Cancer X-ray (10, 20 Gy) 5 FR &10 FR 200 cGy/min Real time PCR --- [19]
HT-29 Colorectal Cancer X-ray (10 Gy) 5 FR 200 cGy/min Real time PCR [19]
CaR1 DLD1 Colorectal Cancer X-ray 5 Gy Real time PCR [3]
Siha Human Cervical X-ray (7 5Gy; 2 Gy, 5 times/weeks) 0.36 Gy/min Real time PCR [20]
C33A
*Eca109R Human ESC X-ray (4-8 Gy) 200 cGy/min Real time PCR [21]
MCF7 Breast Cancer X-ray (20 Gy ) 20 FR & 10 FR 0.4 Gy/min Real time PCR [22]
NIH3T3 Mouse Fibroblast

ESC: Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma; FR: Fraction

PCR: Polymerase chain reaction

*

Radio resistant Eca109 cell line was established by exposing Eca109 cells to 25 doses of 2 Gy

Material and Methods

Cell line and cell culture

In this experimental study, the colorectal cell line, HT-29 provided from Pasteur Institute (Tehran, Iran), were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1460 (Bioidea) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 u/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The cells were incubated at a humidified 5% Co2 atmosphere at 37 °C. The medium was renewed every 2 days and the cell was subcultured using 0.25% trypsin-0.5 mM EDTA solution, whenever required.

Irradiation

HT-29 cells were plated in the 12.5 cm2 tissue culture flask. 70% confluent cells were irradiated with various single doses of x-ray, including 0.1, 2.5, 5 and 10 Gy, emitted from an X-ray unit (Philips, serial number 2.625, Netherland, dose rate: 1.365 Gy/min with 100 kVp and 8 mA) at room temperature. The cells, which received no radiation, were used as a control group.

RNA Extraction

Total cellular RNA was extracted from irradiated cells and their relevant group, 20 h after radiation according to manufacturer’s instruction (Yekta Tajhiz Azma Kit, Tehran, Iran). The extracted RNA was then checked for concentration, purity and integrity using nanodrop® spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis. To avoid DNA contamination, extracted RNAs were treated with RNAs-free DNase I (Thermo Scientific kit, Massachusetts, USA) and inactivated by EDTA.

cDNA Synthesis

To synthesis cDNA, Suprime Script RTase, Oligo-dT and dNTPs (GeNet Bio, Korea) were reversely transcribed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA samples then were stored at -20 °C until further processes. The fidelity of synthesized cDNA was then confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (Ampliqon Taq DNA polymerase Master Mix RED kit, Denmark) using GAPDH primers. The final products were loaded on 2% agarose gel for electrophoresis (Figure 1). Cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s and final extension for 5 min at 72 °C.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gene expression pattern of GAPDH primers in post-irradiated HT-29 cell line and their relevant control group.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Finally, the Ampliqon SYBER Green PCR kit (Denmark) was used to perform real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR). Light Cycler 96 System (Roche, Basal, Switzerland) was used to perform real-time PCR. To study the expression of E-cadherin, the following specific primers were used;

GAPDH: forward, 5′- GACCACTTTGTCAAGCTCATTTCC -3′;

Reverse, 5′- GTGAGGGTCTCTCTCTTCCTCTTGT-3′;

E-cadherin: forward, 5′- ACATATCGGATTTGGAGAGACACT -3′;

Reverse, 5′- CAACTGGAGAACCATTGTCTGTAG -3′;

The CT number of E-cadherin was normalized to GAPDH in each sample. PCR efficiency was measured for the gene of interest using Linreg PCR software, and relative changes for mRNA level were calculated based on the ∆∆Ct method.

Statistical analysis

The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA using Graph Pad Prism version 8.0. Results were reported as mean ± SD and P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Expression of EMT gene, E-cadherin, after exposing to different doses of X-ray

According to the data shown in Figure 2, different doses of X-ray (0.1, 2.5, 5 and 10 Gy) did not change the expression of E-cadherin gene in HT-29 cells significantly (p>0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Expression of E-cadherin gene after irradiation of HT-29 cells with different single doses (0.1, 2.5, 5 and 10 Gy) of X-ray. Total RNA was extracted after 20 h and analyzed for mRNA level of E-cadherin gene. Gene expression values obtained from irradiated cells were compared with control group which was standardized to a value of 1. The experiments were performed at least three times in duplicate and results were presented as mean foldchange±SD.

Discussion

Radiotherapy is one of the most important modalities for cancer treatment. However, according to recent clinical and experimental studies, ionizing radiation might induce invasion and enhance metastasis potential in cancer cells [ 3 , 8 , 19 , 20 , 23 , 24 ]. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that changes undergoing in cell-cell adhesion and cell-extracellular matrix interaction in post-irradiated tumor cells might cause them to loss their epithelial characters and acquire mesenchymal morphology which lead to enhanced potential for migration, invasion and metastasis [ 9 , 18 , 22 ]. Therefore, overcoming the enhancement of metastatic potential through adhesion molecules after radiation treatment is an important issue. Among different adhesion molecules, dysfunction of E-cadherin, with a key role for establishment and maintenance of different junctional structures, has been recognized in various physiological and pathological diseases including cancer [ 10 , 11 , 25 , 26 ]. Several studies demonstrated that the expression of E-cadherin decreases after radiation and causes cancer cells to acquire metastasis potential; On the other hand, there are a few researchers who have observed increased expression of E-cadherin in post-irradiated cancer cells. Owing to this difference, the current study was planned to investigate the effect of different radiation doses on changes occurring in the expression of E-cadherin gene in colorectal cancer cell line HT-29.

Our results indicated that the expression of E-cadherin, due to various radiation doses of X-ray (including 0.1, 2.5, 5 and 10 Gy), enhanced, although compared to control group, it was not statistically significant. In consistent with this result, Akimoto et al., reported that the expression of E-cadherin did not change significantly at earlier times of 1 and 3 h after exposing lung cancer cells (A549 cell line) into 10 Gy of X-ray [ 17 ]; however, they found that the expression of E-cadherin increased 24 h after various doses of X-ray (2-15 Gy) in the same cell line (A549) [ 17 ]. The same result was reported by Ebara et al., in post-irradiated T-SCC cells (human squamous cell carcinoma) after different doses of 2-10 Gy of X-ray [ 18 ].

Tahmasebi et al., demonstrated that the expression of E-cadherin gene did not change significantly after irradiating A549 cells. However, in contrast to our result, they observed that the expression of E-cadherin gene decreased in HT-29 cell line. Regarding the two different irradiation regimens used in the two studies, different changes in E-cadherin gene expression in HT-29 cell line, may be explained. We irradiated the cells with single doses of 0.1, 2.5, 5, and 10 Gy, while, they applied fractionated irradiation regimen (cumulative doses of 10 and 20 Gy with 2 Gy/day fractions) [ 19 ]. There are more evidence that fractionated radiation has rendered reduced expression of E-cadherin gene. In a study carried out by Zhang et al., doses of 20 Gy (1 Gy/day and 2 Gy/day) and greater induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and reduced the expression of E-cadherin gene in breast cancer cells [ 22 ]. Downregulation of E-cadherin expression after fractional radiation with a total dose of 75 Gy has also been reported in cervical cancer cell lines [ 20 ].

Although our data show no significant changes in the expression of E-cadherin, it does not necessarily mean that radiation does not promote invasiveness and metastatic potential in cancer cells, due to the fact that the change of E-cadherin gene is not the just activator of cell migration and invasion. Moreover, according to Ikeguch et al., and Akimoto et al., there is a complex process behind the expression of E-cadherin in metastatic foci of colorectal cancer cells, which might lead to E-cadherin overexpression with negative function [ 17 - 27 ]. In addition, according to molecular studies, Wnt/βcatenin, STAT3 and ZEB1 are reported as the most important signaling pathways associated with E-cadherin expression in colorectal cancer cells [ 12 , 28 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out more studies to investigate the effect of radiation dose on these signaling pathways.

Conclusion

Current study demonstrated that different doses of X-ray did not change the expression of E-cadherin in HT-29 colorectal cancer cells. However, to investigate whether radiation can promote tumor progression, invasion and metastasis in cancer cells through dysregulation of adhesion molecules, examining the effect of dose radiation on the expression of cadherins (P and N-cadherins) and catenins (α, β and γ catenins), as the major components for E-cadherin function, needs to be conducted in future work.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the support for a MSc. degree grant (No. 17247) from Shiraz University of Medical Science and Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Conflict of Interest: None

References

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel R L, Torre L A, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zare-Bandamiri M, Fararouei M, Zohourinia S, Daneshi N, Dianatinasab M. Risk factors predicting colorectal cancer recurrence following initial treatment: a 5-year cohort study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2017;18(9):2465. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.9.2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kawamoto A, Yokoe T, Tanaka K, Saigusa S, Toiyama Y, Yasuda H, Inoue Y, Miki C, Kusunoki M. Radiation induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cells. Oncology Reports. 2012;27(1):51–7. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lagadec C, Vlashi E, Della Donna L, Dekmezian C, Pajonk F. Radiation-induced reprogramming of breast cancer cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30(5):833–44. doi: 10.1002/stem.1058. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Madani I, De Neve W, Mareel M. Does ionizing radiation stimulate cancer invasion and metastasis? Bull Cancer. 2008;95(3):292–300. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moncharmont C, Levy A, Guy J B, Falk A T, et al. Radiation-enhanced cell migration/invasion process: a review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2014;92(2):133–42. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Young A G, Bennewith K L. Ionizing radiation enhances breast tumor cell migration in vitro. Radiation Research. 2017;188(4):381–91. doi: 10.1667/RR14738.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang H, Luo H, Jiang Z, Yue J, Hou Q, Xie R, Wu S. Fractionated irradiation-induced EMT-like phenotype conferred radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Radiation Research. 2016;57(4):370–80. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw030. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 9.Baluna R G, Eng T Y, Thomas Jr C R. Adhesion molecules in radiotherapy. Radiation Research. 2006;166(6):819–31. doi: 10.1667/RR0380.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Birchmeier W, Behrens J. Cadherin expression in carcinomas: role in the formation of cell junctions and the prevention of invasiveness. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Cancer. 1994;1198(1):11–26. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van Roy F, Berx G. The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008;65(23):3756–88. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8281-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Batlle E, Sancho E, Francí C, Domínguez D, Monfar M, Baulida J, De Herreros A G. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nature Cell Biology. 2000;2(2):84–9. doi: 10.1038/35000034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Christofori G, Semb H. The role of the cell-adhesion molecule E-cadherin as a tumour-suppressor gene. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1999;24(2):73–6. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marcucci F, Stassi G, De Maria R. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition: a new target in anticancer drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2016;15(5):311. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2015.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Melissaridou S, Wiechec E, Magan M, Jain M V, Chung M K, Farnebo L, Roberg K. The effect of 2D and 3D cell cultures on treatment response, EMT profile and stem cell features in head and neck cancer. Cancer Cell International. 2019;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0733-1. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berx G, Van Roy F. The E-cadherin/catenin complex: an important gatekeeper in breast cancer tumorigenesis and malignant progression. Breast Cancer Research. 2001;3(5):289. doi: 10.1186/bcr309. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akimoto T, Mitsuhashi N, Saito Y, Ebara T, Niibe H. Effect of radiation on the expression of E-cadherin and α-catenin and invasive capacity in human lung cancer cell line in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 1998;41(5):1171–6. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00176-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ebara T, Mitsuhashi N, Saito Y, Akimoto T, Niibe H. Change in E-cadherin expression after X-ray irradiation of a human cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41(3):669–74. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00096-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tahmasebi-Birgani M J, Teimoori A, Ghadiri A, Mansoury-Asl H, Danyaei A, Khanbabaei H. Fractionated radiotherapy might induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition and radioresistance in a cellular context manner. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2019;120(5):8601–10. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yan S, Wang Y, Yang Q, Li X, Kong X, Zhang N, Yuan C, Yang N, Kong B. Low-dose radiation-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition through NF-κB in cervical cancer cells. International Journal of Oncology. 2013;42(5):1801–6. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zang C, Liu X, Li B, He Y, Jing S, He Y, Wu W, Zhang B, Ma S, Dai W, Li S. IL-6/STAT3/TWIST inhibition reverses ionizing radiation-induced EMT and radioresistance in esophageal squamous carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(7):11228. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14495. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang X, Li X, Zhang N, Yang Q, Moran M S. Low doses ionizing radiation enhances the invasiveness of breast cancer cells by inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2011;412(1):188–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kim R K, Cui Y H, Yoo K C, Kim I G, Lee M, Choi Y H, Suh Y, Lee S J. Radiation promotes malignant phenotypes through SRC in breast cancer cells. Cancer Science. 2015;106(1):78–85. doi: 10.1111/cas.12574. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim R K, Kaushik N, Suh Y, Yoo K C, Cui Y H, Kim M J, Lee H J, Kim I G, Lee S J. Radiation driven epithelial-mesenchymal transition is mediated by Notch signaling in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(33):53430. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10802. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Christou N, Perraud A, Blondy S, Jauberteau M O, Battu S, Mathonnet M. Ecadherin: A potential biomarker of colorectal cancer prognosis. Oncology Letters. 2017;13(6):4571–6. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6063. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Theys J, Jutten B, Habets R, Paesmans K, Groot A J, Lambin P, Wouters B G, Lammering G, Vooijs M. E-Cadherin loss associated with EMT promotes radioresistance in human tumor cells. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2011;99(3):392–7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.044. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ikeguchi M, Makino M, Kaibara N. Clinical significance of E–cadherin–catenin complex expression in metastatic foci of colorectal carcinoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2001;77(3):201–7. doi: 10.1002/jso.1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xiong H, Hong J, Du W, Lin Y W, Ren L L, Wang Y C, Su W Y, Wang J L, Cui Y, Wang Z H, Fang J Y. Roles of STAT3 and ZEB1 proteins in E-cadherin down-regulation and human colorectal cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(8):5819–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.295964. [ PMC Free Article ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering are provided here courtesy of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES