Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leukemia. 2020 Aug 5;35(4):1188–1192. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-1007-6

Comparison of clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and either TP73 or TP53 mutations

Alice S Mims 1, Jessica Kohlschmidt 1,2, Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld 1, Krzysztof Mrόzek 1, James S Blachly 1, Shelley Orwick 1, Dimitrios Papaioannou 1, Deedra Nicolet 1,2, Deepa Sampath 1, Richard M Stone 3, Bayard L Powell 4, Jonathan E Kolitz 5, John C Byrd 1,*, Clara D Bloomfield 1,*
PMCID: PMC7862425  NIHMSID: NIHMS1660597  PMID: 32759975

The transcription factor p53, described as the “guardian of the genome”, becomes activated in response to malignancy-associated stress signals resulting in cell cycle arrest, senescence, differentiation, or apoptosis leading to the inhibition of tumor cell growth.1 Inactivation of the p53 tumor-suppressor pathway is among the most common escape mechanisms allowing survival of malignant cells subjected to cytotoxic stress.2 Inactivating TP53 mutations have been detected in ≤50% of cancers.3

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive bone marrow (BM) malignancy associated with poor long-term survival in most patients. Somatic TP53 mutations occur in AML less frequently than in solid tumors, in 5–10% of de novo and ~33% of therapy-related or secondary AML cases.47 They are associated with older age and poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities [e.g., –5/del(5q), –7/del(7q) and complex karyotype, especially a ‘typical’ complex karyotype].8 Patients with TP53 mutations have very poor outcomes, with complete remission (CR) rates of 20–40% and median overall survival (OS) of 5–9 months.5,8,9 Even for patients attaining a CR, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) yields inadequate results with 3-year OS rates of 10–12%.10

The TP53 gene, located at 17p13.1, consists of an acidic N-terminus transcription activation domain, a second activation domain, a proline rich domain, a central DNA-binding core domain, a nuclear localization signaling domain, an oligomerization domain, and a C-terminal. A second member of the p53 family is p73, a structural homolog of p53 expressed as multiple protein isoforms that vary in function.11 The TP73 gene, located at 1p36.32, includes three structural elements similar to TP53, including DNA-binding, oligomerization and transactivation domains. The p73 protein induces apoptosis similarly to p53 through activation of its downstream target genes. However, p73 also has functions distinct from p53 with roles in neuronal stem cell maintenance, aging and metabolism, and microRNA regulation.12 TP73 is both overexpressed and deleted in cancers but very rarely mutated (<1%).13 Despite large sequencing efforts in AML, TP73 mutations have yet to be described, and it is unknown if they have similar prognostic implications to TP53 mutations.

Therefore, we analyzed 1029 adults (aged ≥17 years) with newly diagnosed AML (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia) using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).7 The patients were treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trials described in the Supplementary Information. Patients dying within 30 days of starting therapy and those who underwent alloSCT in first CR were excluded. Cytogenetic analyses of pretreatment BM and/or blood samples were performed by institutional, CALGB/Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance)-approved laboratories, and the results confirmed by central karyotype review.14 Treatment protocols were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review boards at each center, and all patients provided written informed consent.

Supplementary Information contains definitions of clinical endpoints [i.e., CR, disease-free survival (DFS), OS] and statistical methods used to compare baseline characteristics, co-occurring mutations and outcomes among three patient groups: those with both TP53 and TP73 wild-type, TP73-mutated patients with TP53 wild-type, and TP53-mutated patients with TP73 wild-type. Data collection and statistical analyses were performed by the Alliance Statistics and Data Center using SAS 9.4 and TIBCO Spotfire S+ 8.2 with a dataset locked on January 10, 2019.

The mutational status of 81 protein-coding genes was determined centrally at The Ohio State University by targeted amplicon sequencing using two different gene panels on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA; details in Supplementary Information). The presence or absence of biallelic CEBPA mutations, FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD), and the FLT3-ITD to FLT3 wild-type allelic ratio were determined as described in Supplementary Information, resulting in 82 genes assessed in our study.

We detected 13 TP73 mutations in 12 patients, with two different TP73 mutations found in one patient. Another patient (no. 12 in Supplementary Table S1) had concurrent TP73 and TP53 mutations. All TP73 mutations were missense and occurred throughout the gene without any hotspot regions (Figure 1A). In contrast, most of 98 TP53 mutations found in 88 patients were in the DNA-binding domain within hotspot codons (R175, Y220, G245, and R248)3 (Figure 1B). Eight patients had 2 and one patient had 3 TP53 mutations. Among 98 TP53 mutations, 72 were missense, 18 frameshift, 6 nonsense, and 2 deletions. Variant allele fractions (VAFs) were >0.20 in 92% of patients with TP73 mutations and in all TP53-mutated patients. Nine-hundred-thirty patients had wild-type TP53 and TP73.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A) Lollipop plot depicting 13 TP73 mutations found in 12 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Eleven patients each had a single TP73 mutation and one patient had two different TP73 mutations. The patient with dual mutations in both TP73 and TP53 is included. The structural domains of the gene are represented by color coding as outlined in the figure. Missense mutations are depicted by the blue circles. B) Lollipop plot depicting 98 mutations in the TP53 gene found in 88 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. The patient with dual mutations in both TP73 and TP53 is included. The structural domains of the gene are represented by color coding as outlined in the figure. Frameshift mutations are depicted by the red circles, nonsense mutations are depicted by the orange circles, missense mutations are depicted by the blue circles, and indel mutations are depicted by the gray circles. The numbers within each circle denote the numbers of mutations at certain sites within the gene.

We found no significant differences in pretreatment characteristics between TP73-mutated and TP53-mutated patients, except for TP73-mutated patients being classified half as often in the adverse-risk category of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification15 (P<0.001; Supplementary Table S2). The only difference between TP73-mutated and wild-type patients was lower presenting white blood cell (WBC) counts in the former (P=0.03). Compared with wild-type patients, TP53-mutated patients were older (P<0.001), had lower platelet (P=0.02) and WBC counts (P<0.001), lower percentages of blood (P<0.001) and BM blasts (P=0.01), and were more often classified in the 2017 ELN adverse-risk category (P<0.001).

Cytogenetically, TP73-mutated patients had normal karyotypes most often [six (50%) patients], followed by complex karyotypes, detected in two (16%) patients (Supplementary Table S1). Cytogenetic findings in TP53-mutated patients are summarized in Supplementary Table S3. Most patients (70%) had ‘typical’ and 5% ‘atypical’ complex karyotypes.8 The remaining patients had other cytogenetic abnormalities in a non-complex karyotype (19%) or a normal karyotype (6%). All patients with microscopically detectable loss of 17p had ‘typical’ complex karyotypes.

Regarding co-occurring mutations, TP73-mutated patients harbored more mutations in the cohesin complex (36% vs 8%, P=0.02), NPM1 (36% vs 5%, P=0.006) and methylation-related (64% vs 28%, P=0.03) genes than TP53-mutated patients. TP73-mutated patients also had more mutations in the cohesin complex genes than the wild-type patients (36% vs 12%, P=0.04; Supplementary Table S4). Compared with wild-type patients, TP53-mutated patients had less frequent mutations in chromatin remodeling (7% vs 18%, P=0.007), kinases (14% vs 42%, P<0.001), methylation-related (28% vs 50%, P<0.001), NPM1 (5% vs 42%, P<0.001) and the RAS pathway (14% vs 26%, P=0.01) genes. Frequencies of single gene mutations in each group are listed in Supplementary Table S5. Mutations co-occurring with TP73 and TP53 mutations with frequencies of ≥2% are depicted in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2, respectively.

Concerning treatment, 83 of 87 (96%) TP53-mutated patients and 10 of 11 (91%) TP73-mutated patients received intensive induction treatment. The remaining 5 patients were treated on CALGB 11002 with decitabine+/−bortezomib. We found no significant difference in CR rates between TP73-mutated and TP53-mutated patients (64% vs 40%, P=0.20). However, TP73-mutated patients had a longer DFS (median, 2.0 vs 0.4 years, P=0.005) and OS (median, 3.9 vs 0.4 years; P<0.001) than TP53-mutated patients (Figure 2 and Table 1). Conversely, there were no significant differences between the TP73-mutated and wild-type patients in CR rates (64% vs 71%; P=0.52), DFS (median, 2.0 vs 1.1 years; P=0.59) or OS (median, 3.9 vs 1.5 years; P=0.28). Median survival of all patients in the study was 8.6 years.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves depicting the a disease-free survival and b overall survival of de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients with TP73 mutations (blue) compared with those of patients with TP53 mutations (red) and of patients with wild-type (wt) TP73 and TP53 genes (black).

Table 1.

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients with TP73 mutations, patients with TP53 mutations, and patients without TP53 or TP73 mutation (wild-type)

TP73m TP53m Wild-type Pa Pa Pa
Endpoint n=11 n=87 n=930 TP73m vs TP53m TP73m vs wt TP53m vs wt
Complete remission, % 64 40 71 0.20 0.52 <0.001

Disease-free survival 0.005 0.59 <0.001
 Median, years 2.0 0.4 1.1
 % Disease-free at 1 year (95% CI) 100 11 (4–24) 52 (48–56)
 % Disease-free at 3 years (95% CI) 29 (4–61) 9 (2–21) 33 (30–37)

Overall survival <0.001 0.28 <0.001
 Median, years 3.9 0.4 1.5
 % Alive at 1 year (95% CI) 100 15 (8–23) 63 (60–66)
 % Alive at 3 years (95% CI) 55 (23–78) 5 (1–10) 36 (33–39)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; m, mutated; n, number; wt, wild-type.

a

P-values for categorical variables are from Fisher’s exact test, P-values for time to event variables are from the log-rank test.

As expected, TP53-mutated patients had inferior CR rates (40% vs 71%; P<0.001), and shorter DFS (median, 0.4 vs 1.1 years; P<0.001) and OS (median, 0.4 vs 1.5 years; P<0.001; Figure 2 and Table 1) than wild-type patients. There were only six TP53-mutated long-term survivors (OS >2 years). Two patients underwent alloHCT with refractory disease after initial therapy [one patient treated on 10503 with one induction with cytarabine, daunorubicin and etoposide and another (with a concurrent TP73 mutation) treated on 19808 with 2 inductions of cytarabine, daunorubicin and etoposide+/−valspodar] with OS of 6.7 and 10.2 years, respectively. Three patients received induction on 10503 and underwent autologous transplantation in first CR per protocol with OS ranging from 3.6 to 6.7 years. The remaining long-term survivor was treated on 9720 with cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide+/−valspodar and had an OS of 2.2 years.

Determining pretreatment clinical and molecular features and treatment outcomes associated with TP73 mutations in AML is of interest because p73 is part of the p53 family. TP73 mutations differ from TP53 mutations with regard to rate of occurrence, 1% versus 9%, and associations with other mutations. TP73-mutated patients more often harbored mutations in cohesin complex, NPM1 and methylation-related genes. Pretreatment clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between TP73-mutated and TP53-mutated patients except for the assignment into the 2017 ELN risk groups. Importantly, our study has revealed that the key difference between TP73- and TP53-mutated patients is that TP73-mutated patients have DFS and OS superior to those of TP53-mutated patients. However, since the number of TP73-mutated patients is relatively small, our findings should be validated in an independent patient cohort.

Most TP53-mutated patients in our study responded poorly to intensive cytotoxic approaches, with a 40% CR rate and a 1-year DFS rate of 11% and OS rate of 15%. Conversely, our findings suggest that cytotoxic chemotherapy is more appropriate for both TP73-mutated (CR rate, 64%; 1-year DFS and OS rates, 100%) and TP73 and TP53 wild-type patients (CR rate, 71%; 1-year DFS rate, 52%; 1-year OS rate, 63%). Identification of the mechanisms underlying chemo-responsiveness of TP73-mutated patients and chemoresistance in TP53-mutated patients could provide valuable insights for designing therapies to improve the poor outcomes in TP53-mutated AML.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the patients who consented to participate in these clinical trials and the families who supported them; to Donna Bucci and the CALGB/Alliance Leukemia Tissue Bank at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, for sample processing and storage services and Lisa J. Sterling for data management. This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute (grants CA233338, CA101140, CA140158, CA180861, CA196171, CA016058, CA180821, CA180882, U24CA196171, R35CA198183 (to J.C.B) and CA077658), the Leukemia Clinical Research Foundation, the Warren D. Brown Foundation, the Alliance Clinical Scholar program (to A.S. Mims), and by an allocation of computing resources from The Ohio Supercomputer Center.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information for this article is available at Leukemia’s website.

References

  • 1.Vousden KH, Lu X. Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:594–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Candi E, Agostini M, Melino G, Bernassola F. How the TP53 family proteins TP63 and TP73 contribute to tumorigenesis: regulators and effectors. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:702–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Olivier M, Hollstein M, Hainaut P. TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a001008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ok CY, Patel KP, Garcia-Manero G, Routbort MJ, Fu B, Tang G, et al. Mutational profiling of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia by next generation sequencing, a comparison with de novo disease. Leuk Res. 2015;39:348–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rücker FG, Schlenk RF, Bullinger L, Kayser S, Teleanu V, Kett H, et al. TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood. 2012;119:2114–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eisfeld A-K, Mrózek K, Kohlschmidt J, Nicolet D, Orwick S, Walker CJ, et al. The mutational oncoprint of recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2017;31:2211–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mrózek K, Eisfeld A-K, Kohlschmidt J, Carroll AJ, Walker CJ, Nicolet D, et al. Complex karyotype in de novo acute myeloid leukemia: typical and atypical subtypes differ molecularly and clinically. Leukemia. 2019;33:1620–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stengel A, Kern W, Haferlach T, Meggendorfer M, Fasan A, Haferlach C. The impact of TP53 mutations and TP53 deletions on survival varies between AML, ALL, MDS, and CLL: an analysis of 3307 cases. Leukemia. 2017;31:705–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Quek L, Ferguson P, Metzner M, Ahmed I, Kennedy A, Garnett C, et al. Mutational analysis of disease relapse in patients in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2016;1:193–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wei J, Zaika E, Zaika A. p53 family: role of protein isoforms in human cancer. J Nucleic Acids. 2012;687359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Billant O, Léon A, Le Guellec S, Friocourt G, Blondel M, Voisset C. The dominant-negative interplay between p53, p63, p73: a family affair. Oncotarget. 2016;7:69549–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yoshikawa H, Nagashima M, Khan MA, McMenamin MG, Hagiwara K, Harris CC. Mutational analysis of p73 and p53 in human cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 1999;18:3415–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mrózek K, Carroll AJ, Maharry K, Rao KW, Patil SR, Pettenati MJ, et al. Central review of cytogenetics is necessary for cooperative group correlative and clinical studies of adult acute leukemia: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B experience. Int J Oncol. 2008;33:239–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Applebaum FR, Büchner T, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129:424–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES