Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Feb 4;10(5):e01029-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01029-20

Genome Sequence of a Novel Soil Actinomycete, Protaetiibacter sp. Strain SSC-01

Huiquan Duan a,*, Chamil E Fernando a, Scott S Crupper a, Stephen D Fields a,
Editor: Kenneth M Stedmanb
PMCID: PMC7862950  PMID: 33541872

The family Microbacteriaceae represents a diverse and important group of soil bacteria in the phylum Actinobacteria. Here, we report the genome sequence of a soil Microbacteriaceae strain, Protaetiibacter sp. strain SSC-01, the second putative species of the genus. Iron acquisition and xylose metabolism are central pathways identified in the annotated genome.

ABSTRACT

The family Microbacteriaceae represents a diverse and important group of soil bacteria in the phylum Actinobacteria. Here, we report the genome sequence of a soil Microbacteriaceae strain, Protaetiibacter sp. strain SSC-01, the second putative species of the genus. Iron acquisition and xylose metabolism are central pathways identified in the annotated genome.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The actinobacteria are dominant taxa in temperate soils and make significant contributions to processes such as polysaccharide digestion, antibiotic-based microbial inhibition, heavy metal chelation, and plant growth stimulation (1). The placement of many of the taxa within the phylum is in flux, and the Microbacteriaceae family has undergone numerous recent revisions with newly proposed genera (13).

The Microbacteriaceae strain SSC-01, which was collected from cultivated garden soil in east central Kansas, United States (38.42N, 95.85W), was isolated by passaging single colonies through multiple rounds of growth on Reasoner’s 2A agar (4) at 37°C. Other media supporting SSC-01 growth were blood agar (Difco BD, Sparks, MD, USA) with defibrinated sheep’s blood (Hemostat Labs, Dixon, CA, USA) and tryptic soy agar (Difco BD) supplemented with 10 μM FeCl3·6H2O. DNA was isolated from bacterial lawns grown on blood agar using the Quick-DNA fungal/bacterial miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). SeqMatic LLC (Fremont, CA, USA) prepared a genomic library with the TruSeq protocol targeting a 450-bp insert. Illumina MiSeq sequencing with a 500-cycle TruSeq kit (v.2 chemistry) generated 2,107,131 paired-end 251-bp reads. Adapters were removed with Cutadapt (v.2.5) (5), resulting in 1,057,609,266 bases of Illumina sequencing. A DNA library for Nanopore MinION sequencing, prepared with the ligation sequencing kit (SQK-LSK109; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK), generated 24,000 reads averaging 4,285 bp. Illumina and Nanopore reads were uploaded to the public usegalaxy.org server (6) for processing with FASTQ Groomer (v.1.1.5), fastp (v.0.19.5+galaxy1), and/or Porechop (v.0.2.3) tools (79) using default settings. Unicycler (v.0.4.8.0) (10) was used to assemble 1.5 million paired Illumina reads (252-fold coverage) using 14,856 high-quality MinION reads (21.5-fold coverage) as a scaffold to generate a single 2,958,807-bp contig with a GC content of 71.5%. Circularity was confirmed by identifying Nanopore reads spanning the artificial ends of the assembled contig.

Annotation using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) server (11) identified 2,690 potential protein-coding genes, 52 RNA-coding genes, and 30 pseudogenes. Approximately 33% of the putative proteins have unknown function, but over 20 proteins are predicted to be involved in iron acquisition pathways, including siderophore-based import, hemolysin III toxins, and heme transporters. Hemicellulose metabolism (including xylan and xylose), terpene synthesis, and heavy metal chelation pathways each have 10 or more predicted enzymes, suggesting important roles for this microbe in plant-soil interactions (12, 13).

Needleman-Wunsch nucleotide alignments of full 16S rRNA gene sequences using NCBI default settings revealed the greatest identity to both Lysinimonas KACC 19322 (GenBank accession no. MT367295.1) and Protaetiibacter intestinalis (originally Lysinimonas sp. strain 2DFWR-13) (GenBank accession no. MH989600.1) at 98.6%. Global comparative analysis with the RAST SEED viewer (14) showed that the average identity of all orthologous protein sequences of SSC-01 is higher for P. intestinalis than for other closely related species (Table 1), leading to tentative identification of strain SSC-01 as a Protaetiibacter sp. This second putative species of the genus represents a different ecological niche than P. intestinalis, which was isolated from a larval Protaetia moth gut (3). A Mexico City, Mexico, landfill metagenome (GenBank accession no. RDDZ01000083.1), however, suggests the existence of other soil Protaetiibacter species.

TABLE 1.

Species that are closely related to strain SSC-01 that have available complete genomic sequencesa

Species/strain GenBank accession no. No. of orthologues shared with SSC-01b Mean identity with SSC-001(%)
Leifsonia xyli CTCB07 NC_006087.1 1,581 55.6
Lysinimonas sp. KACC 19322 NZ_CP043504.1 2,129 71.9
Lysinimonas sp. SLBN-160 NZ_JACBYT010000001.1 2,057 55.9
Protaetiibacter intestinalis NZ_CP032630.1 2,317 75.7
a

Predicted orthologous proteins and their average percent identity with their SSC-1 counterparts were determined with the sequence-based comparative software of the RAST SEED browser (14).

b Amino acid identity of 30% used as the threshold for orthology.

Data availability.

This bacterial genome sequence has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. CP059987. Raw sequence data used for assembly have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. PRJNA649951. The assembly described in this paper is the first version (GenBank accession no. CP059987.1).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding was provided through an Institutional Development Award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant P20 GM103418.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk H-P, Clément C, Ouhdouch Y, van Wezel GP. 2016. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80:1–43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jang Y-H, Kim S-J, Tamura T, Hamada M, Weon H-Y, Suzuki K, Kwon S-W, Kim W-G. 2013. Lysinimonas soli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil, and reclassification of Leifsonia kribbensis Dastager et al. 2009 as Lysinimonas kribbensis sp. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1403–1410. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.042945-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heo J, Cho H, Kim MA, Hamada M, Tamura T, Saitou S, Kim S-J, Kwon S-W. 2019. Protaetiibacter intestinalis gen. nov., of the family Microbacteriaceae, isolated from gut of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis, reclassification of Lysinimonas kribbensis Jang et al. 2013 as Pseudolysinimonas kribbensis gen. nov., comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Lysinimonas Jang et al. 2013. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:2101–2107. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. 1985. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.49.1.1-7.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marcel M 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blankenberg D, Gordon A, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Galaxy Team . 2010. Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy. Bioinformatics 26:1783–1785. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Loman NJ, Quinlan AR. 2014. Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing Nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:3399–3401. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aznar A, Dellagi A. 2015. New insights into the role of siderophores as triggers of plant immunity: what can we learn from animals? J Exp Bot 66:3001–3010. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sharma V, Salwan R, Al-Ani LKT (ed). 2020. Molecular aspects of plant beneficial microbes in agriculture. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This bacterial genome sequence has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. CP059987. Raw sequence data used for assembly have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. PRJNA649951. The assembly described in this paper is the first version (GenBank accession no. CP059987.1).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES