Abstract
Objectives
Earlier studies suggest that imbalance between effort and reward at work associates with exhaustion. Others have found that exhaustion increases turnover intentions; an important precursor of actual turnover that also associates with counterproductive work behaviors. Few, however, have studied the associations between effort‐reward imbalance (ERI) and employees’ intentions to leave their current employment, and whether exhaustion is underpinning that relationship. Here, we investigate the mediating role of exhaustion in the effort‐reward imbalance – turnover intentions relationship.
Methods
Data from three waves covering a time span of four years from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH) were analysed using structural equation modeling. Cross‐lagged mediation analyses were conducted to estimate if associations from ERI to subsequent turnover intentions were mediated by exhaustion. Other causal directions (direct and reversed direct effects, reversed mediation) were also examined.
Results
A direct path from ERI T1 to turnover intentions T2 was found, but not from ERI T2 to turnover intentions T3. Additionally, results showed that ERI at time points T1/T2 associated significantly with exhaustion two years later (T2/T3). Also, exhaustion at T1 showed a small but statistically significant direct association with turnover intentions at T2 (no association was found between exhaustion T2 and turnover intentions T3). A small, but statistically significant indirect effect from ERI to turnover intentions was found (estimate 0.005; 95% CI 0.002‐0.010).
Conclusions
Providing a good balance between effort and reward for workers is essential to protect employee health and help retain employees in the organization.
Keywords: burnout, Sweden, work engagement
1. INTRODUCTION
One of the most prominent theoretical models to explain how work environment factors induce strain is the effort‐reward imbalance (ERI) model. This model has its roots in social exchange theories and in the notion of distributive justice. 1 In short, it assumes that stressful experiences occur if efforts at work are not reciprocated adequately by socially defined rewards (ie, money, esteem and status in terms of promotion prospects and job security).
A large amount of research has shown that higher levels of ERI associate with negative health outcomes, such as cardiovascular diseases, 2 depression, 3 , 4 and lower self‐reported health. 5 Furthermore, some research studies have investigated how ERI associates with withdrawal behavior (eg lateness, absenteeism, turnover intentions). 5 , 6 , 7 , 8
From a theoretical point of view, it has been argued that ERI may be linked to withdrawal behaviors because people do not passively remain in a situation where efforts are not adequately rewarded, but instead try to reach a balance, either by maximizing their rewards and/or reducing their efforts. 5 To reduce efforts, the employee might disengage from the organization either physically through, for example, turnover, absenteeism, or lateness, or psychologically, through for example, lack of creativity or reduced work engagement. Here, we concentrate on one specific form of withdrawal behavior, that is, turnover intentions. Turnover intentions are not only a reliable precursor of actual turnover, 9 which means considerable expenses for organizations in terms of monetary costs as well as knowledge drainage, 10 but relate also to other unfavorable outcomes, such as increased counterproductive work behaviors and decreased organizational citizenship behaviors. 11
Results from previous, mainly cross‐sectional studies, 6 , 8 , 12 , 13 and some longitudinal studies, 7 , 14 , 15 suggest that high effort, low rewards and their combination, ERI, positively relate to turnover intentions. Many of these studies focus on specific occupational groups, often in human relation occupations, such as nurses, teachers, and health care workers. 7 , 8 , 14 , 15 For example, one study based on Belgian nurses revealed a positive association between baseline ERI and intentions to leave the current organization as well as the nursing profession one year later. 14 Similar findings were reported for European nurses, where reward frustration predicted intentions to leave one year later. 7
Possible underlying mechanisms in the ERI‐turnover intentions relationship have not been studied in much detail. Some researchers have suggested that job satisfaction may be negatively affected by high ERI, which then results in higher turnover intentions. 12 , 13 Another underlying mediating factor might be found in burnout/exhaustion. However, evidence regarding the association between ERI and burnout is rather scarce and inconclusive, 16 although a number of cross‐sectional studies 8 , 12 , 17 and prospective studies 18 , 19 suggest a positive association between ERI and burnout. One study found evidence only for reward predicting burnout symptoms two years later. 20
Finally, there is also some evidence, again predominantly from cross‐sectional studies that emotional exhaustion as a component of burnout relates to turnover intentions. 21 , 22 , 23 Some longitudinal evidence comes from a study on managers who were followed weekly over six weeks: it was found that increases in exhaustion were associated with higher subsequent turnover intentions. 24 In another study on mental health workers, it was found that increases in emotional exhaustion and decreases in job satisfaction were both significantly associated with increases in turnover intentions six months later. 25
Putting together evidence from earlier cross‐sectional and prospective studies, it seems plausible to assume that ERI may result in exhaustion and, over time, increase turnover intentions. However, rigorous longitudinal studies investigating these associations in the general working population are lacking. Consequently, our aim of this study is twofold. We investigate (a) whether ERI predicts exhaustion and turnover intentions over time and (b) whether exhaustion mediates the relationship between the ERI and turnover intentions in a large sample of Swedish employees. By doing so, we extend to ERI literature, that has focused much on depression, and sub‐clinical depressive symptoms and less so on exhaustion. Unravelling the underlying mechanisms that link ERI and turnover intentions via exhaustion over time in a large dataset approximately representative for the general working population, this study also provides new insights into how to prevent turnover and thus contributes with knowledge important for employers, unions, and policy makers. By studying reversed effects, that is, effects of turnover intentions on exhaustion and ERI, we also add to the turnover intention literature, which has mainly focused on turnover intentions as an outcome, while ignoring how turnover intentions influence other work‐related behaviors as well as perceptions of the workplace and work environment.
2. METHODS
2.1. Sample
Data were drawn from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH) study, which was initiated in 2006 as a follow‐up of participants of the Swedish Environment Survey (SWES) in 2003. Since, data have been collected every second year and participants from later SWES have been added. All participants are invited to answer a paper and pencil questionnaire in two versions, one for those currently in paid work for 30% or more and one for those who work less as they have temporarily or permanently left working life. Today, SLOSH consists of all SWES participants 2003‐2011. For a detailed cohort profile description see Magnusson Hanson et al. 26
The current study is based on participants who answered the questionnaire for those in paid work in the three latest waves of SLOSH, ie 2014 (n = 15 359), 2016 (n = 13 572) and 2018 (n = 11 553). Of the 15 359 participants who answered the questionnaire for those in paid work in 2014, 3545 did not participate in the following wave and a further 1490 answered the questionnaire for those not in paid work. Of the remaining 10 324 participants, in 2018 1850 did not answer the questionnaire and 1099 answered the questionnaire for those not in paid work (for a flow chart see Figure 1). Consequently, the final study sample consisted of 7375 participants (longitudinal response rate = 48%). All participants gave informed consent before taking part.
FIGURE 1.

Flow chart to illustrate the sample selection procedure. Participants are drawn from the SLOSH study
2.2. Effort‐reward imbalance
Effort and reward were measured by the Swedish validated short version of the Effort‐Reward Imbalance questionnaire, 4 where effort is measured by three items (eg ‘I have constant time pressure due to heavy workload’) and reward by seven items (eg ‘Considering all my efforts and achievements, I receive the respect and prestige I deserve at work’). Reward consists of three components: ‘esteem’ and ‘job security’, each represented by two items, and ‘job promotion’, represented by three items. Items are answered on a four‐point Likert‐scale ranging from 1 = agree totally to 4 = do not agree at all. Where needed, items were reversed. The sum score for each of the two dimensions, effort and reward, was calculated, such that higher scores reflect higher effort and higher rewards. The Cronbach's alpha for effort was 0.78 for all three waves and varied between 0.71 and 0.72 for reward. Finally, an effort‐reward ratio was constructed. This was done based on a predefined algorithm (effort score divided by reward score, multiplied by the ratio of the number of items). Higher values indicate higher imbalance.
2.3. Exhaustion
Exhaustion was measured by six of eight items of the Shirom‐Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM), 27 , 28 namely ‘I feel tired’, ‘I feel “fed‐up”’, ‘My “batteries” are “dead”’, ‘I feel burned out’, ‘I feel mentally fatigued’, and ‘I feel no energy for going to work in the morning’. All items are answered on a 7‐point scale ranging from 1 (‘almost never’) to 7 (‘almost always’). Two items of the original scale, ie ‘feeling refreshed’ (the only positively formulated item) and ‘I feel physically exhausted’ (the only item relating to physical fatigue), provided relatively low factor loadings and rendered that scale no time invariant and were consequently excluded. In excluding the positive formulated item, we follow recommendations from Shirom & Melamed. 28 To measure exhaustion, a mean score of the remaining 6‐item scale was calculated. This measure showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha varied between 0.90 and 0.91) and was found to be time invariant (scalar invariant), indicating that relations between the items and the latent factor were similar and means were comparable across time.
2.4. Turnover intentions
Intentions to leave one's job were measured by a single question ‘I feel like resigning from my current employment’ with five response options ranging from ‘strongly disagree’ (1) to ‘strongly agree’ (5). 29
2.5. Covariates
We controlled for age, gender, and income, which were all obtained by linkage of questionnaire data to registries by means of the unique Swedish ten‐digit personal identification number. Age is age at baseline year (2014), gender was coded into ‘0’ for male and ‘1’ for female, and income is gross income during the year in Swedish crowns. Finally, we control for change of job, because some people may have changed job between waves, which could influence their ERI, exhaustion and turnover intentions. Information on job turnover was obtained from questionnaire data (‘The following questions apply to your place(s) of work in the past two years: Have you changed work?’) and coded into ‘yes’ and ‘no’.
2.6. Analytical strategy
To test the hypotheses, we specified and tested various structural models. We used cross‐lagged panel models for mediation analyses, which take stability and correlation of measurements over time into account. 30 Maximum likelihood estimates based on the MLR estimator are reported and full information maximum likelihood (FIML) was utilized to reduce bias due to missing data. 31 In order to set the independent and dependent variables on one metric and account for measurement error in single indicator variables, the observed variables ERI and turnover intentions were translated into latent variables with a single indicator where the residual variances were fixed to (1‐ reliability) * sample variance. 32 We assumed a reliability of 0.70. 33 In the modeling process, for a more parsimonious model lagged effects were not constrained to be equal. Specifically, we tested the following structural models (see Appendices, Figure S1):
(a) An autoregressive model (Model 1) included the temporal stability effects between the constructs. For instance, ERI at Time 1 (T1) was specified to predict ERI at Time 2 (T2), and ERI at T2 was set to predict ERI at Time 3 (T3). At every time point, all variables were set to correlate freely. (b) A direct effects model (Model 2) extended the baseline model by adding the cross‐lagged effect from ERI to exhaustion and from ERI to turnover intentions. That is, ERI at T1 was set to predict exhaustion and turnover intentions at T2 and ERI at T2 was set to predict exhaustion and turnover intentions at T3. (c) A mediation model (Model 3) extended Model 2 by adding paths from exhaustion to turnover intentions. (d) A reversed direct effects model (Model 4) extended Model 3 by including the reversed cross‐lagged effects. Specifically, exhaustion at T1 (T2) was set to predict ERI at T2 (T3). (e) A full effects model (Model 5) extended Model 4 by including additional reversed cross‐lagged effects from turnover intentions at T1 (T2) to exhaustion T2 (T3) and ERI at T2 (T3). In all models, we controlled for age, gender, and income at Time 1, and for change of job at Time 2 and Time 3. The significance and confidence intervals for the total indirect effect were assessed with bootstrap estimation (10 000 samples).
Differences in model fit were assessed based on the chi‐square difference test for continuous non‐normal variables for nested models. 34 Model fit was assessed with the comparative fit index (CFI), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and the standardized root mean square error of approximation (SRMR). RMSEA values lower than 0.06, CFI and TLI values above 0.90 and SRMR values smaller than 0.10 were considered to indicate acceptable model fit. 35 , 36 Sample statistics were analyzed in SAS 9.4, SEM analyses were conducted in Mplus (version 8).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Descriptive characteristics
Sample characteristics are found in Table 1. The mean age of the sample was about 50 (SD = 8.69) years at baseline. Around 60% of the sample were women and the mean yearly income was 392 thousand Swedish crowns (SD = 182.52). Around 20% changed job between T 1 and T2 and between T2 and T3 respectively.
TABLE 1.
Descriptive characteristics of the sample (n = 7375)
| 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yrs (mean ± SD) | 49.94 ± 8.69 | 51.94 ± 8.69 | 53.94 ± 8.69 |
| Women, % (n) | 58.79 (4336) | 58.79 (4336) | 58.79 (4336) |
| Yearly income, in thousand SEK (mean ± SD) | 392 ± 182 | 423 ± 196 | 453 ± 208 |
| Job turnover during the past two years, % (n) | — | 20.75 (1520) | 20.95 (1536) |
| Effort‐reward imbalance, range 0.2‐4.0 (mean ± SD) | 1.08 ± 0.43 | 1.07 ± 0.41 | 1.05 ± 0.41 |
| Exhaustion, range 1‐7 (mean ± SD) | 2.46 ± 1.17 | 2.48 ± 1.22 | 2.48 ± 1.24 |
| Turnover intentions, range 1‐5 (mean ± SD) | 1.75 ± 1.14 | 1.81 ± 1.17 | 1.84 ± 1.21 |
3.2. Model testing
Model fit for the different models are presented in Table 2. The full model (Model 5) was the best fitting model (see Figure 2). This model showed significant direct paths from ERI at one time point to exhaustion (EX) two years later (ERI T1→EX T2 β = 0.129, P = .000; ERI T2→EX T3 β = 0.090, P = .000). ERI at T1 showed also an association with turnover intentions at T2 (β = 0.059, P = .039), but this association became non‐significant from ERI T2 to turnover intentions T3 (β = 0.031, P = .192). The model also revealed a borderline significantly direct path from exhaustion T1 to turnover intentions T2 (β = 0.038, P = .051), which reached statistical significance from T2 to T3 (β = 0.041, P = .030). The indirect effect estimate over all three time points was 0.005 (bootstrap 95% CI 0.001 to 0.010); that is, for every 1‐unit increase of the mean score of ERI (ranging from 0.2 to 4.0) an increase (ranging from 0‐1) of 0.005 in turnover intentions goes via exhaustion. In addition to the causal direct paths and the indirect path, also a number of reversed paths were significant, namely a direct path from exhaustion at T1 to ERI at T2 (β = −0.060, P = .005), but not from exhaustion T2 to ERI T3 (β = −0.017, P = .318). Furthermore, direct paths from turnover intentions at one time point to ERI two years later were revealed (TI T1→ERI T2 β = −0.188, P < .001; TI T2→ERI T3 β = −0.106, P < .001). No direct paths from turnover intentions to exhaustion at the next time point were found (TI T1→EX T2 β = −0.018, P = .366; TI T2→EX T3 β = −0.019, P = .276).
TABLE 2.
Model fit table for effort‐reward imbalance, burnout, and turnover intentions, controlled for age, gender, income, and job change
| Chi2 | df | Chi2 diff a | RMSEA | CFI | TLI | SRMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Stability effects | 7795.588 | 362 | 0.053 | 0.926 | 0.917 | 0.055 | |
| Model 2: M1 + ERI →EX, TI | 7728.174 | 358 |
vs. Model 1: P < .0001 |
0.053 | 0.926 | 0.916 | 0.054 |
| Model 3: M2 + EX→TI | 7707.557 | 356 |
vs. Model 2: P < .0001 |
0.053 | 0.926 | 0.916 | 0.054 |
| Model 4: M3 + EX→ERI | 7685.927 | 354 |
vs. Model 3: P < .0001 |
0.053 | 0.927 | 0.916 | 0.053 |
| Model 5: M4 + TI→ERI, EX | 7600.779 | 350 |
vs. Model 4: P < .0001 |
0.053 | 0.927 | 0.916 | 0.053 |
N = 7287.
Abbreviations: CFI, comparative fit index; df, degrees of freedom; ERI, effort‐reward imbalance; EX, exhaustion; RMSEA, root‐mean‐square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root‐mean‐square residual; TI, turnover intentions.
Satorra‐Bentler Scaled Chi‐Square difference test
FIGURE 2.

Structural equation model parameters and P‐values for paths among effort‐reward imbalance, exhaustion and turnover intentions (Model 5). Note: Standardized estimates provided (except for covariates and autocorrelations between T1 and T3); *P ≤ .05; ***P ≤ .001
Among covariates, age associated negatively with ERI (r = −.056, P < .001), exhaustion (r = −.076, P = .001), and turnover intentions (r = −.168, P = .001). Being female was positively associated with ERI (r = .120, P = .001) and exhaustion (r = .100, P = .001), but not turnover intentions (r = .017, P = .206). Income associated negatively with ERI (r = −.054, P = .001) and exhaustion (r = −0.059, P = .001) and positively with turnover intentions (r = .037, P = .006). Having changed the job during the previous two years associated negatively with ERI both at T2 (r = −.232, P = .001) and T3 (r = −.265, P = .001), exhaustion both at T2 (r = −.050, P = .001) and T3 (r = −.091, P = .001), and turnover intentions both at T2 (r = −.174, P = .001) and T3 (r = −.173, P = .001).
4. DISCUSSION
This paper had two overall aims: Firstly, we investigated ERI as a possible predictor of exhaustion and turnover intentions over time. Secondly, we studied if exhaustion would function as a mediator in the ERI‐turnover intentions relationship. To further explore relationships between ERI, exhaustion and turnover intentions over time, we additionally tested for reversed mediating and reversed direct paths, and adjusted for a number of potential confounders as control variables.
Our results confirm a strong cross‐sectional association between ERI and turnover intentions in the way that experiencing poor balance between effort and reward associates with turnover intentions measured at the same point in time. However, as such associations allow no conclusions to be drawn about the direction of the association, our main interest was to investigate if ERI precedes turnover intentions. However, we found only inconsistent support for ERI being a precursor of later turnover intentions; ERI at T1 predicted turnover intentions at T2, but ERI at T2 did not predict turnover intentions at T3. One possible reason might be that turnover intentions were on average rather low in our sample (about 1.8 on a scale from 1 to 5, see Table 1). Also, as we included auto‐regressions as well as cross‐sectional relationships little variance was left to be explained.
Turning our attention to the association between ERI and exhaustion, we can see that ERI is strongly associated with subsequent exhaustion, also when taking cross‐sectional correlations into account. Thus, our finding resembles previous cross‐sectional 8 , 12 , 17 and prospective studies 18 , 19 that report positive associations between ERI and burnout. Furthermore, we found that exhaustion predicted subsequent turnover intentions. Our finding thus supports earlier finding that suggest that burnout is a predictor of turnover intentions. 24 , 25 , 37 This finding has earlier been explained in the way that withdrawal behaviors such as turnover intentions may be used in order to lower or eliminate work stressors and are thus used as an attitudinal coping strategy when burnout reduces the required individual resources within the work context. 38
Taken together, our results indicate that exhaustion mediates the relationship between ERI and turnover intentions. Even though the indirect effect estimate was small in size, this needs to be put in relation to the fact that it was tested with a rather strict test considering all possible cross‐sectional and reverse causation paths. Also, as suggested by previous research, there are other mediating mechanisms apart from emotional exhaustion 12 , 13 and future research may need to test what emotional exhaustion means relative to other such mediation pathways to better understand the ERI‐turnover intentions relationship.
When studying the ERI‐turnover intentions relationship, we also controlled for other factors relating to turnover intentions. Two important contributing factors to ERI seem to be income and prior actual turnover. While one might expect that those with lower income would report higher turnover intentions, we found that those with higher income actually reported higher turnover intentions. At the same time, income was positively associated with lower levels of ERI and exhaustion. A possible explanation might be that those with higher income have also other resources to dispose of, for example, in terms of education and work experience, which makes them more attractive in the labor market. Also, those who had changed workplace during the two preceding years reported significantly lower levels of ERI, exhaustion, and turnover intentions. This is indirectly suggested by Siegrist, 39 who proposed that a lack of reciprocity in terms of high cost and low gain occurs frequently where workers have no alternative choice in the labor market, implying that those who have alternatives will change their situation. This idea is also supported by a previous study that showed that both high ERI and available employment opportunities were independently associated with intentions to leave the nursing profession. 15
In addition to the causal path from ERI to turnover intentions and exhaustion, we also found some reversed causal paths. For one, exhaustion was negatively associated with ERI, such that higher levels of exhaustion predicted lower levels of ERI two years later, though the association reached only statistical significance between T1 and T2. Second, turnover intentions associated negatively with ERI, indicating that higher levels of intentions to leave were associated with lower levels of ERI two years later. These findings seem at the first glance surprising. One possible explanation is that people who experience high levels of exhaustion and/or turnover intentions at one point in time, do successfully cope with these feelings, for example, in terms of finding a new job, job crafting, 40 or acceptance, 41 and thus report lower ERI at the next time point.
When inspecting our findings, it is of importance to keep in mind that measurement points were two years apart. This time span might have been better suited to uncover associations with reactions that need some time to develop. While turnover intentions might be a rather spontaneous reaction to events in the work environment, feeling of exhaustion may take longer time to develop. Indeed, Zapf et al 42 suggest specific time relationships of stressors and strains, where time lags that are too long leads to an underestimation of the true causal impact. Consequently, our study design might not have been optimal to uncover potential longitudinal effects from ERI to turnover intentions, but better suited to capture relations between ERI and exhaustion. However, most earlier studies on ERI and its consequences used time lags of one or two years 7 , 14 , 18 , 20 and until now, there is little guidance for researchers to plan for optimal time lags in longitudinal studies. 43 To find an optimal time lag may be particularly problematic if the intention, as in our study, is to include a large population, and to measure both health‐related and behavioral intention effects that may need different time lags to unfold. Our time span of two years between measurements may also explain the reversed effects. Most probably it will take some time to effectively cope with turnover intentions eg by job crafting, which would be mirrored in the negative effect from turnover intentions at one point in time to ERI two years later. Further studies with repeated measures with different time lags are needed to shed light on the timely development among ERI, exhaustion, and turnover intentions.
4.1. Strength and limitations
Strengths of our study are the prospective design with three repeated waves of measurement and the use of a statistical method that accounted for stability and correlation of measurements over time of all variables. The use of a study population approximately representative of the working population allows for a better generalizability as many of the earlier studies investigating ERI in relation to exhaustion and turnover intentions that focus on specific professions, often in the health care sector. Still, as our study population had a mean age of 50 and reported low levels of turnover intentions, results might not be generalizable to younger populations or populations who generally report more turnover intentions. Using only one of the sub‐dimensions of burnout, we were not able to investigate associations between ERI and other sub‐dimensions such as cognitive weariness. Also, sample attrition might have affected our results, where especially those with the highest levels of exhaustion might be more likely to not participate in the study and/or to leave employment (and thus are not included in the study sample). While we controlled for some of the most important possible confounders, reasons for experiencing turnover intentions are manifold and there might be other factors from the private life, such as family issues, or from the psychosocial work environment, such as social aspects at the workplace or emotional demands, that might influence turnover intentions, but which we could not control for.
5. CONCLUDING REMARKS
ERI has previously been shown to associate negatively with a number of health outcomes. Here, we could show that ERI not only relates to exhaustion, but also to turnover intentions. Turnover intentions are an important predictor of actual turnover, but are also related with lowered discretionary behaviors at work 11 ; two phenomena related with considerable costs for organizations. Consequently, organizations should strive to reduce turnover intentions among their employees. Our results show that one way to do so is to improve employees’ effort‐reward balance. There are several ways organizations can improve the effort‐reward ratio for their employees. On the organizational level, ERI can be improved by reducing efforts and work demands while simultaneously improving rewards, this can, for example, be done as part of the regular monitoring of work environment factors and the incentives provided at the workplace. On the individual level, a dialogue between manager and employee on mutual expectations regarding efforts and rewards may be important as part of the communication and managing of the psychological contract. 44 Also, stress management interventions at work has been shown to be particularly effective for improving the effort‐reward ratio. 45 Providing employees with psychotherapeutic interventions or coaching to reduce exhaustion and improve stress management may perhaps also help tackle aspects of burnout and turnover intentions. Importantly, any intervention may be most promising if it addresses both the individual and the organizational level. 46
DISCLOSURE
Ethical permission for SLOSH (#2017/2535‐32) and the current study (#2018/1439‐32) were obtained by the Regional Research Ethics Board in Stockholm. All study participants gave their informed consent. Authors declare no Conflict of Interests for this article.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
CL, C.B‐O., and CE conceived the ideas; CL analyzed the data; all authors interpreted the data for the work; CL wrote the first and subsequent drafts of the work; all authors revised it critically for important intellectual content; all authors approved the final version to be published.
Supporting information
Figure S1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working life and Welfare [#2017‐0259] and the Swedish Research Council [VR, #2013‐1645 and #2013‐1646]. The study utilized data from the REWHARD consortium supported by the Swedish Research Council [VR, #2017‐00624].
Leineweber C, Bernhard‐Oettel C, Eib C, Peristera P, Li J. The mediating effect of exhaustion in the relationship between effort‐reward imbalance and turnover intentions: A 4‐year longitudinal study from Sweden. J Occup Health. 2021;63:e12203 10.1002/1348-9585.12203
REFERENCES
- 1. Siegrist J. Job control and reward In: Cartwright S, Cooper CL, eds. Handbook of Organizational Well Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:109‐132. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dragano N, Siegrist J, Nyberg ST, et al. Effort‐reward imbalance at work and incident coronary heart disease: A multicohort study of 90,164 individuals. Epidemiology. 2017;28(4):619‐626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rugulies R, Aust B, Madsen IEH. Effort‐reward imbalance and affective disorders In: Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M, eds. Work stress and health in a globalized economy: The model of effort‐reward imbalance. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016:103‐143. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Li J, Leineweber C, Nyberg A, Siegrist J. Cost, gain, and health: theoretical clarification and psychometric validation of a work stress model with data from two national studies. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61(11):898‐904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli WB. Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(5):1117‐1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kinnunen U, Feldt T, Mäkikangas A. Testing the effort‐reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: The role of perceived organizational support. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(2):114‐127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li J, Galatsch M, Siegrist J, Muller BH, Hasselhorn HM. Reward frustration at work and intention to leave the nursing profession–prospective results from the European longitudinal NEXT study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(5):628‐635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Loerbroks A, Meng H, Chen ML, Herr R, Angerer P, Li J. Primary school teachers in China: associations of organizational justice and effort‐reward imbalance with burnout and intentions to leave the profession in a crosssectional sample. International Archives of Occupational and Environment Health. 2014;87:695‐703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nei D, Snyder L, Litwiller B. Promoting retention of nurses: a meta‐analytic examination of causes of nurse turnover. Health Care Manage Rev. 2015;40:237‐253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hom PW, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Griffeth RW. Reviewing employee turnover: focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(5):831‐858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mai KE, Ellis APJ, Christian JS, Porter COLH. Examining the effects of turnover intentions on organizational citizenship behaviors and deviance behaviors: A psychological contract approach. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(8):1067‐1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Devonish D. Effort‐reward imbalance at work: the role of job satisfaction. Personnel Rev. 2018;47(2):319‐333. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Dorenkamp I, Weiß E‐E. What makes them leave? A path model of postdocs’ intentions to leave academia. High Educ. 2018;75(7):747‐767. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Derycke H, Vlerick P, Burnay N, et al. Impact of the effort‐reward imbalance model on intent to leave among Belgian health care workers: a prospective study. J Occup Organ Psych. 2010;83(4):879‐893. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li J, Shang LI, Galatsch M, et al. Psychosocial work environment and intention to leave the nursing profession: a cross‐national prospective study of eight countries. Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(3):519‐536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Aronsson G, Theorell T, Grape T, et al. A systematic review including meta‐analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(264). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gluschkoff K, Elovainio M, Kinnunen U, et al. Work stress, poor recovery and burnout in teachers. Occup Med. 2016;66(7):564‐570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Koch P, Kersten JF, Stranzinger J, Nienhaus A. The effect of effort‐reward imbalance on the health of childcare workers in Hamburg: a longitudinal study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017;12(16). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Spence Laschinger HK, Leiter MP. The impact of nursing work environments on patient safety outcomes: the mediating role of burnout/engagement. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(5):259‐267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hadžibajramović E, Ahlborg G, Grimby‐Ekman A. Concurrent and Lagged Effects of Psychosocial Job Stressors on Symptoms of Burnout. Int Archives Occup Environ Health. 2019;92(2):1013‐1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Noh M, Jang H, Choi B‐J. Organisational justice, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intention among Korean IT professionals: moderating roles of job characteristics and social support. Int J Technol Manag. 2019;79(3/4):322. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Park R. Responses to emotional exhaustion: do worker cooperatives matter? Personnel Rev. 2019;48(2):438‐453. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Grant AA, Jeon L, Buettner CK. Relating early childhood teachers’ working conditions and well‐being to their turnover intentions. Educational Psychol. 2019;39(3):294‐312. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lin S‐H, Scott BA, Matta FK. The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: a conservation of resources perspective. Acad Manag J. 2019;62(5):1556‐1582. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yanos PT, DeLuca JS, Salyers MP, Fischer MW, Song J, Caro J. Cross‐sectional and prospective correlates of associative stigma among mental health service providers. Psychiat Rehab J. 2020;43(2):85‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Magnusson Hanson LL, Leineweber C, Persson V, Hyde M, Theorell T, Westerlund H. Cohort profile ‐ The Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(3):691‐692i. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Melamed S, Kushnir T, Shirom A. Burnout and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Behav Med. 1992;18(2):53‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Shirom A, Melamed S. A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures in two groups of professionals. Int J Stress Manage. 2006;13(2):176‐200. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hellgren J, Sverke M, Isaksson K. A two‐dimensional approach to job insecurity: consequences for employee attitudes and well‐being. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 1999;8(2):179‐195. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Little TD, Preacher KJ, Selig JP, Card NA. New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. Int J Behav Dev. 2007;31(4):357‐365. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equ Model. 2001;8(3):430‐457. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hayduk LA. Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: Ohns Hopkins University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wanous JP, Reichers AE, Hudy MJ. Overall job satisfaction: how good are single‐item measures? J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(2):247‐252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Satorra A, Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi‐square test statistic. Psychometrika. 2010;75(2):243‐248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1‐55. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Byrne BM. Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Barthauer L, Kaucher P, Spurk D, Kauffeld S. Burnout and career (un)sustainability: looking into the Blackbox of burnout triggered career turnover intentions. J Vocat Behav. 2020;117:103334. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lee RT, Ashforth BE. ,A longitudinal study of burnout among supervisors and managers: comparisons between the Leiter and Maslach (1988) and Golembiewski et al. (1986) models. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1993;54(3):369‐398. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M. Work stress and health in a globalized economy: the model of effort‐reward imbalance. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cort WR, Katz IM, Lavige KN, Zacher H. Job crafting: a meta‐analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. J Vocat Behav. 2017;102:112‐138. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Britt TW, Crane M, Hodson SE, Adler AB. Effective and ineffective coping strategies in a low‐autonomy work environment. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;12(2):154‐168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zapf D, Dormann C, Frese M. Longitudinal studies on organizational stress research: a review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1:145‐169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dormann C, Griffin MA. Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychol Methods. 2015;20(4):489‐505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Conway N, Briner RB. Understanding psychological contracts at work: a critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Li J, Riedel N, Barrech A, et al. Long‐term effectiveness of a stress management intervention at work: a 9‐year follow‐up study based on a randomized wait‐list controlled trial in male managers. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Noblet A, Lamontagne AD. The role of workplace health promotion in addressing job stress. Health Promotion Int. 2006;21(4):346‐353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1
