Skip to main content
Canadian Pharmacists Journal : CPJ logoLink to Canadian Pharmacists Journal : CPJ
. 2020 Dec 10;154(1):19–25. doi: 10.1177/1715163520975809

Hypertension Canada’s 2020 hypertension guidelines for pharmacists: An update

Kaitlyn E Watson 1,✉, Yazid N Al Hamarneh 1, Doreen Rabi 1, Stella S Daskalopoulou 1, Ross T Tsuyuki 1
PMCID: PMC7863283  PMID: 33598055

Introduction

Canadian health professionals have had access to evidence-based Canadian hypertension guidelines on managing and diagnosing hypertension since 1999.1 The 2020 guidelines produced by Hypertension Canada continue to be held to a high international standard and mark the 21st publication of the guidelines. The 2020 guidelines have outlined new recommendations and undertaken an exhaustive review of the existing ones and, where appropriate, removed recommendations that are out of date with the evidence or redundant.2

Hypertension management continues to be a Canadian health care priority. Community-based, pharmacist-led hypertension interventions yield significant clinical benefits; therefore, pharmacists are recognized as a vital component of the hypertension detection and management strategy in Canada.3-11

The Canadian Pharmacists Journal has consistently published regular and relevant updates of the hypertension guidelines for pharmacists.12-15 This article outlines updates with the release of the 2020 Hypertension Canada guidelines. We outline the new recommendations that are relevant for pharmacists and highlight existing recommendations that remain clinically important. Readers are encouraged to access the full guidelines in Canadian Journal of Cardiology2 or on Hypertension Canada’s website (www.hypertension.ca).

What’s new

Terminology

Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) is still the preferred method of measurement for measuring blood pressure (BP) in the office. Where this method is not possible, office BP measurement (OBPM, previously known as non-AOBP) is suggested. Table 1 outlines the definitions and preferred methods of BP measurement according to the 2020 Hypertension Canada guidelines. Home BP monitoring (HBPM) is recommended for patients with inadequate BP control. HBPM values above ≥135/85 mmHg are considered high. We encourage pharmacists to refer to the full guidelines2 on BP thresholds and targets for treatment initiation.

Table 1.

Hypertension Canada’s 2020 guidelines measurement definitions

Acronym Definition
AOBP Automated office blood pressure is performed using automated office oscillometric devices, the patient is seated in a quiet room (no specified rest period). The device is set to take measurements at 1-2 minutes intervals. The first measurement is taken with the provider in the room to verify cuff position and measurement. Then the patient is left alone in the room while to device takes subsequent measurements. Record the average BP as displayed on the device, the arm used, and the position of the patient.BP values considered high* = mean SBP ≥135 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg (Grade D) Preferred method of in-office measurement and diagnosis
OBPM Office blood pressure measurement is performed using an upper arm device with the provider in the room. Oscillometric or electronic devices are preferred when using this method. The patient is rested in a seated position for 5 minutes before the reading. The provider performs 3 readings, discarding the first reading and the averaging the subsequent 2 readings.
Auscultatory devices are an alternative if an electronic device is not available.
BP values considered high† = SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg (Grade C)
ABPM Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring requires the use of a validated oscillometric device, which must be worn by the patient for a 24-hour period, with measurements taken at 20- to 30-minute intervals during the day and night.
BP values considered high* = mean awake SBP ≥135 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg or mean 24-hour SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥80 mmHg (Grade C)
Preferred out-of-office methods for diagnosis
HBPM Home blood pressure monitoring is a self-monitoring method, which requires the patient to measure their BP twice in the morning and evening for 7 days.
BP values considered high* = SBP ≥135 mmHg or DBP ≥85 mmHg (Grade C)

Hypertension Canada 2020 guidelines measurement definitions adapted with permission from the Canadian Journal of Cardiology.2

BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

*

For people with diabetes, BP thresholds are yet to be established and may be lower.

†

For people with diabetes, BP value is considered high if the SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥80 mmHg.

Readers are encouraged to view the full guidelines for recommended BP measurement techniques.

Resistant hypertension

It is suggested that resistant hypertension (RHT) has an estimated prevalence of 10% to 30%.16 The Hypertension Canada 2020 guidelines for the management of RHT state a patient has apparent RHT if they are above target despite being on optimal doses of 3 or more antihypertensives, preferably including a diuretic.16 When diagnosing apparent RHT, it is important to rule out other causes—pseudo-resistance (nonadherence, white coat hypertension and treatment inertia) and secondary causes (Figure 1). Accurate BP measurements are required to diagnose true RHT, including AOBP or OBPM and ABPM or HBPM. The out-of-office measurement in addition to the in-office measurement allows for the exclusion of white coat hypertension.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Diagnostic algorithm for a patient with suspected resistant hypertension

Reproduced with permission from the Canadian Journal of Cardiology.2

ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; BP, blood pressure; HT, hypertension.

*Three or more drugs, at optimally tolerated dosages and preferably including a diuretic.

†Home BP monitoring can be performed if ABPM is not accessible.

Nonpharmacological management strategies (reduction of sodium, increase in potassium, weight reduction and reduction of alcohol intake) should still be integrated into the care of patients with RHT. Patients with RHT are typically on the base regimen known as A-C-D (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker with calcium channel blocker and diuretic) and a fourth antihypertensive agent. There is some debate as to what the fourth agent should be, as many RHT studies have reported only short-term outcomes.17-19 The Hypertension Canada 2020 guidelines suggest the additional use of spironolactone, bisoprolol, doxazosin, amiloride or clonidine, in addition to the baseline regimen, to decrease BP in patients with RHT.16 The evidence suggests the largest BP reduction has been shown with spironolactone used as the fourth antihypertensive.16,17,19 To assist in optimizing antihypertensive management, thiazide-like diuretics and medications with a longer duration should be used at the highest tolerated doses.16

Pregnancy

In women with hypertension, the possibility of pregnancy should be reviewed regularly while of childbearing age (Grade D). Uncontrolled hypertension within the first trimester of pregnancy can significantly increase maternal mortality and morbidity and threaten the viability of pregnancy.20 Hypertension poses a significant risk for preeclampsia and other pregnancy-related complications.21

It is important that potential pregnancy is considered when deciding on antihypertensive treatment in women with hypertension. If a woman is considering pregnancy, it is suggested to stabilize hypertension with antihypertensive medications that are conducive to a viable pregnancy. According to the 2020 hypertension guidelines, renin angiotensin system (RAS) medications—ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)—should be discontinued prior to conception to reduce any possible risks of exposure to the fetus. Research has not established when these RAS medications should be discontinued, but their use during pregnancy has been associated with increased risk of fetal malformations.22 Treatment of hypertension in women who are pregnant should follow the Hypertension Canada guidelines for managing hypertension in pregnancy.2,23 Furthermore, in women who are breastfeeding, antihypertensive medications that have been shown to have a low concentration in the breastmilk should be considered, including labetalol, methyldopa, long-acting nifedipine, enalapril or captopril.

Pharmacists are encouraged to provide preconception counselling to women with hypertension who are considering pregnancy. Pharmacists should also take pregnancy into consideration when prescribing or recommending antihypertensive therapy. The evidence is limited on the benefits of preconception counselling on risk reduction, but it provides an opportunity to increase health literacy and education for women with hypertension on the importance of hypertension management during pregnancy and the associated risks.24,25

Aspirin recommendation removed for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

The previous recommendation on the use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been removed in the 2020 hypertension guidelines. This recommendation for aspirin use was based on the 1998 Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial.26 However, recent trials and meta-analyses have identified that the risk of major bleeds outweighs any marginal benefits of cardiovascular (CV) protection in primary prevention of CVD.27-30

Alcohol use

Based on the available evidence, the 2020 Hypertension Canada guidelines have recommended healthy adults to abstain from alcohol or reduce their alcohol consumption to less than 2 standard drinks per day to prevent hypertension (Grade B). In patients with hypertension who drink more than 2 drinks per day, any reduction in alcohol consumption is recommended, as it is associated with a lowering of BP (Grade A).

Wood et al.31 identified a positive linear relationship between hypertension-related mortality and alcohol consumption (Hazard Ratio per 100 g per week higher consumption, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.33). A systematic review of the effects of alcohol on BP found that in adults with hypertension who drink more than 2 drinks per day, lowering alcohol consumption resulted in lowered BP.32 This positive effect on hypertension from lowering alcohol consumption was determined to be dose dependent, with the largest hypertension-related effect observed in patients who drink 6 or more drinks per day.32

Pharmacists are encouraged to educate their patients on the effects that alcohol consumption has on their BP and provide advice on lowering or abstaining from alcohol, considering that there is no safe limit for alcohol consumption.

Adherence

Nonadherence to medications for chronic conditions (like hypertension) is always a concern for pharmacists.33 Nonadherence to hypertension treatment regimens is one of the major contributors to inadequately controlled hypertension and should be addressed. Many different factors can negatively influence patients’ adherence to antihypertensives.34 There is no single methodology to assess patient nonadherence, but 2 reviews have identified nonadherence as a significant problem in patients with hypertension.35,36

It is recommended that pharmacists routinely assess patients’ adherence to antihypertensive medications and discuss any possible factors that could be contributing to nonadherence. Assessing adherence to treatment regimens is imperative before considering changing or stepping up antihypertensive treatment or increasing antihypertensive doses. Patients are more satisfied and more likely to adhere to treatment plans that are collaboratively developed. We encourage pharmacists to engage in shared decision making with patients and other health care providers (e.g., family physicians) to develop a shared understanding of competing risks and benefits and come to an agreement on appropriate individualized targets and therapies. Motivational interviewing is suggested as a possible strategy in identifying nonadherence and providing a platform for recommending adherence strategies.37 Another recommended strategy is to inform patients of their CV risk and the positive impacts changing their modifiable risk factors can have on their CV risk.5 We encourage pharmacists to refer to the full guidelines on possible strategies to improve patient adherence. Some of the suggested strategies are listed as follows2:

  • Link medication schedule to a patient’s daily routine (Grade D)

  • Condense medication schedule to once-daily dosing when possible (Grade D)

  • Switch patient to single-pill combinations (Grade C)

  • Use dose administration aids (Grade D)

  • Incorporate a multidisciplinary team approach (Grade B)

  • Encourage patient ownership of their disease management (Grade C)

  • Provide education on hypertension and treatment options for the patient and their families (Grade C)

  • Encourage adherence through out-of-office contact (either by phone or mail), particularly during the first 3 months of therapy (Grade D)

What is still important for pharmacists

Diagnosis

Hypertension Canada has updated the diagnostic algorithm for adults in the 2020 guidelines (Figure 2). This update clarified the information provided for patients with diabetes and BP measurements. Current evidence on measurement thresholds in patients with diabetes using AOBP, ABPM or HBPM is inconclusive. Thus, the current guidelines consider an OBPM of ≥130/80 mmHg on 3 or more measurements on different days sufficient to diagnose hypertension in a patient with diabetes, with the consideration of performing ABPM or HBPM to rule out white coat hypertension.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hypertension Canada’s 2020 guidelines diagnosis algorithm

Reproduced with permission from the Canadian Journal of Cardiology.2 All measurement values in algorithm are reported as mmHg.

ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure measurement; AOBP, automated office blood pressure (performed with the patient unattended in a private room); HBPM, home blood pressure measurement; HTN, hypertension; OBPM, office blood pressure measurement (performed in the office using an electronic upper arm device with a provider in the room); WCH, white coat hypertension.

*If AOBP is used, use the mean calculated and displayed by the device. If OBPM is used, take at least 3 readings, discard the first and calculate the mean of the remaining measurements. A history and physical exam should be performed and diagnostic tests ordered.

†Serial office measurements over 3 to 5 visits can be used if ABPM or HBPM is not available.

‡Home BP series: Two readings taken each morning and evening for 7 days (28 total). Discard first day readings and average the last 6 days.

§In patient with suspected masked hypertension, ABPM or HBPM could be considered to rule this out.

Management

Pharmacists are strategically important in detecting and managing hypertension in Canada. There are over 4.5 million people in Canada who do not have access to a family physician.38 It has also been acknowledged that patients visit their pharmacists up to 7 times more often than their other health care professionals (such as family physicians).38 Pharmacists are in a unique position to proactively “case-find” individuals who may be unaware of their hypertension and who may not be being managed by a physician. There is high level of evidence supporting the benefits of pharmacists’ interventions on hypertension management, providing a cost-efficient service to patients.5,6,39

Pharmacists can provide education and awareness of the risks of hypertension and modifiable risk factors to prevent or control hypertension. Educating a patient on their CV risk has been identified as a strategy to improving risk factor modifications (Grade B).15 Pharmacists should identify patients at high CV risk and provide intensive management as appropriate. The SPRINT trial identified patients as high risk for a CV event if they were aged 50 years or older with systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels ≥130 mmHg and had one of the following40 (Grade B):

  • Clinical or subclinical cardiovascular disease

  • Chronic kidney disease

  • Estimated 10-year global CV risk ≥15%

  • Age ≥75 years

It is recommended to consider intensive hypertension management to below SBP <120 mmHg in these patients.40

Follow-ups

There is strong evidence that patient gains from pharmacist-led interventions are diminished if there is no consistent follow-up.41,42 Thus, the authors cannot stress enough the importance of follow-up visits for managing patients with hypertension. The schedule for follow-up depends on the individual patient and their symptoms/hypertension control. Patients on antihypertensive medications should be reviewed approximately every 1 to 3 months, depending on whether their hypertension is controlled or if dose adjustments and/or treatment regimen changes are required.2 A patient’s CV risk should also be taken into consideration when determining duration of follow-up visits for an at-risk patient. Given that visits with the physician might not always be so frequent, the role of the pharmacists in follow-up is essential.

It is noteworthy that adequate BP control requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving physicians, pharmacists, nurses and other health care providers and, most important, patient engagement.

Conclusion

The 2020 Hypertension Canada guidelines present 6 changes that are relevant to pharmacists:

  1. The terminology for office BP measurement conducted with the provider in the room has changed from non-AOBP to OBPM. This is important when reviewing the new guidelines, diagnosis and treatment algorithms.

  2. Hypertension Canada has produced specific 2020 guidelines on the management of resistant hypertension, which include the use of a fourth antihypertensive agent.

  3. Pregnancy should be considered at regular encounters when managing patients with hypertension of childbearing age. Preconception counselling should be offered to these women, and possible pregnancy should be accounted for when selecting antihypertensive treatments.

  4. ASA is no longer recommended for primary prevention of CVD, and pharmacists should amend their actions accordingly.

  5. There is no harmless amount of alcohol consumption in preventing hypertension, and abstinence or reduction of alcohol consumption should be recommended to patients at risk of or who have hypertension.

  6. Potential nonadherence should be considered in patients before changing or stepping up their treatment for inadequate hypertension control.

Readers are encouraged to refer to the full guidelines2 in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology or on the Hypertension Canada website (www.hypertension.ca), where additional patient and professional resources and tools can be found. Printable Hypertension Highlights pocket cards in both English and French can be found at https://guidelines.hypertension.ca/chep-resources. There are also additional educational materials available on the Hypertension Canada website for pharmacists, including a newly launched Hypertension Canada Professional Certification Program, which provides certification for pharmacists on hypertension management. To learn more about this new program, please visit Hypertension Canada’s website at https://hypertension.ca/professional-certification-program/.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding:The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs:Kaitlyn E. Watson Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6617-9398

Yazid N. Al Hamarneh Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-3542

References

  • 1. Feldman RD, Campbell N, Larochelle P, et al. 1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension. Task Force for the Development of the 1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension. CMAJ 1999;161(Suppl 12):S1-S17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rabi DM, McBrien KA, Sapir-Pichhadze R, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2020 comprehensive guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, risk assessment and treatment of hypertension in adults and children. Can J Cardiol 2020;36(5):596-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Al Hamarneh YN, Hemmelgarn BR, Hassan I, Jones CA, Tsuyuki RT. The effectiveness of pharmacist interventions on cardiovascular risk in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: the multicentre randomized controlled RxEACH trial. Can J Diabetes 2017;41(6):580-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Santschi V, Chiolero A, Paradis G, Colosimo AL, Burnand B. Pharmacist interventions to improve cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2012;35(12):2706-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tsuyuki RT, Al Hamarneh YN, Jones CA, Hemmelgarn BR. The effectiveness of pharmacist interventions on cardiovascular risk: the multicenter randomized controlled RxEACH trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67(24):2846-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tsuyuki RT, Houle SK, Charrois TL, et al. Randomized trial of the effect of pharmacist prescribing on improving blood pressure in the community: the Alberta clinical trial in optimizing hypertension (RxACTION). Circulation 2015;132(2):93-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Santschi V, Tsuyuki RT, Paradis G. Evidence for pharmacist care in the management of hypertension. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2015;148(1):13-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Campbell NRC, Poirier L, Tremblay G, Lindsay P, Reid D, Tobe SW. Canadian Hypertension education program: the science supporting new 2011 CHEP recommendations with an emphasis on health advocacy and knowledge translation. Can J Cardiol 2011;27(4):407-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tobari H, Arimoto T, Shimojo N, et al. Physician-pharmacist cooperation program for blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a randomized-controlled trial. Am J Hypertens 2010;23(10):1144-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. McLean DL, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, et al. A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists–Hypertension (SCRIP-HTN). Arch Intern Med 2008;168(21):2355-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Carter BL, Doucette WR, Franciscus CL, Ardery G, Kluesner KM, Chrischilles EA. Deterioration of blood pressure control after discontinuation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30(3):228-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Houle SKD, Padwal R, Poirier L, Tsuyuki RT. The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) guidelines for pharmacists: an update. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2015;148(4):180-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Houle SK, Padwal R, Poirier L, Tsuyuki RT. The 2014 Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) guidelines for pharmacists: an update. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2014;147(4):203-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Houle SK, Padwal R, Tsuyuki RT. The 2012-2013 Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) guidelines for pharmacists: an update. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2013;146(3):146-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Al Hamarneh YN, Houle SKD, Padwal R, Tsuyuki RT. Hypertension Canada’s 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines for pharmacists: an update. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2016;149(6):337-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hiremath S, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Nakhla M, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2020 evidence review and guidelines for the management of resistant hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2020;36(5):625-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant S, et al. Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial. Lancet 2015;386(10008):2059-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Williams B, MacDonald TM, Morant SV, et al. Endocrine and haemodynamic changes in resistant hypertension and blood pressure responses to spironolactone or amiloride: the PATHWAY-2 mechanisms substudies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018;6(6):464-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krieger EM, Drager LF, Giorgi DMA, et al. Spironolactone versus clonidine as a fourth-drug therapy for resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2018;71(4): 681-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lu Y, Chen R, Cai J, Huang Z, Yuan H. The management of hypertension in women planning for pregnancy. Br Med Bull 2018;128(1):75-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG; High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ 2016;353:i1753-i. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bullo M, Tschumi S, Bucher BS, Bianchetti MG, Simonetti GD. Pregnancy outcome following exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists: a systematic review. Hypertension 2012;60(2):444-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Butalia S, Audibert F, Cote AM, et al. Hypertension Canada’s 2018 guidelines for the management of hypertension in pregnancy. Can J Cardiol 2018;34(5):526-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Beckmann MM, Widmer T, Bolton E. Does preconception care work? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;54(6):510-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Davenport MH, Ruchat SM, Poitras VJ, et al. Prenatal exercise for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2018;52(21):1367-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 1998;351(9118):1755-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zheng SL, Roddick AJ. Meta-analysis of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events—reply. JAMA 2019;321(22):2244-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mahmoud AN, Gad MM, Elgendy AY, Elgendy IY, Bavry AA. Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2019;40(7):607-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. McNeil JJ, Wolfe R, Woods RL, et al. Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events and bleeding in the healthy elderly. N Engl J Med 2018;379(16):1509-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Aimo A, De Caterina R. Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: advice for a decisional strategy based on risk stratification. Anatol J Cardiol 2020;23(2):70-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wood AM, Kaptoge S, Butterworth AS, et al. Risk thresholds for alcohol consumption: combined analysis of individual-participant data for 599 912 current drinkers in 83 prospective studies. Lancet 2018;391(10129):1513-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Tobe SW, Gmel G, Hasan OSM, Rehm J. The effect of a reduction in alcohol consumption on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2017;2(2):e108-e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Cutler RL, Torres-Robles A, Wiecek E, et al. Pharmacist-led medication non-adherence intervention: reducing the economic burden placed on the Australian health care system. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019;13:853-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Burnier M, Egan BM. Adherence in hypertension. Circ Res 2019;124(7): 1124-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Durand H, Hayes P, Morrissey EC, et al. Medication adherence among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2017;35(12):2346-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hameed MA, Dasgupta I. Medication adherence and treatment-resistant hypertension: a review. Drugs Context 2019;8:212560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ren Y, Yang H, Browning C, Thomas S, Liu M. Therapeutic effects of motivational interviewing on blood pressure control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2014;172(2):509-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Khan N, Bell A, Berg A, et al. A call to action to implement prescribing authority to pharmacists for hypertension management. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2019;152(5):285-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Al Hamarneh YN, Johnston K, Marra CA, Tsuyuki RT. Pharmacist prescribing and care improves cardiovascular risk, but is it cost-effective? A cost-effectiveness analysis of the RxEACH study. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2019;152(4):257-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. The SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 2015;373(22):2103-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Al Hamarneh YN, Sauriol L, Tsuyuki RT. After the diabetes care trial ends, now what? A 1-year follow-up of the RxING study. BMJ Open 2015; 5(8):e008152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. MacCallum L, Consiglio G, MacKeigan L, Dolovich L. Uptake of community pharmacist-delivered MedsCheck diabetes medication review service in Ontario between 2010 and 2014. Can J Diabetes 2017;41(3):253-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Pharmacists Journal : CPJ are provided here courtesy of University of Toronto Press

RESOURCES