Skip to main content
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research logoLink to Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
letter
. 2021 Feb 5;16:114. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02263-2

Response to comments on: Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures

Yao Lu 1,2, Gen Wang 3, Bin Hu 4, Cheng Ren 1, Liang Sun 1, Zhimeng Wang 1, Changjun He 5, Hanzhong Xue 1, Zhong Li 1, Kun Zhang 1, Teng Ma 6,7,, Qian Wang 8,
PMCID: PMC7863465  PMID: 33546706

Thanks very much for your interest in the article “Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures” [1]. We agree with Dr. Lu’s opinion that the description of the ideal starting point and Fig. 2B was not matched in our manuscript. In order to strength our statement, we provided a more rigorous Figure to match our opinion that the ideal starting point for tibial nailing of the SP approach is in the intersection of tibial midline and tibial plateau articular surface. As demonstrated by Bible et al. [2], twin peaks anteroposterior position (AP) images is safe for a starting point according to tibia-based referencing for proximal tibia radiographs. Too lateral a start can cause varus, in the tibia fractures, whereas too medial a starting point can create valgus [2]. Therefore, we recommend the ideal enter point as being “in the intersection of tibial midline and tibial plateau articular surface” at AP image and at the anterior edge of the tibial plateau on the lateral view. The ideal starting point in Fig. 2B we provided is slightly lower. We now correct Fig. 2B to provide a more accurate lateral starting point.

Replaced Figure 2B Starting point under fluoroscopic guidance

graphic file with name 13018_2021_2263_Figa_HTML.jpg

Acknowledgements

None.

Authors’ contributions

The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Teng Ma, Email: gukemt@163.com.

Qian Wang, Email: tianyunqilai@163.com.

References

  • 1.Lu Y, Wang G, Hu B, Ren C, Sun L, Wang Z, He C, Xue H, Li Z, Zhang K, et al. Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01960-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bible JE, Choxi AA, Dhulipala SC, Evans JM, Mir HR. Tibia-based referencing for standard proximal tibial radiographs during intramedullary nailing. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2013;42(11):E95–E98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES