Abstract
Seven of the 57 human cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes are mitochondrial and carry out important reactions with steroids and vitamins A and D. These seven P450s utilize an electron transport chain that includes NADPH, NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase (AdR), and adrenodoxin (Adx) instead of the diflavin NADPH-P450 reductase (POR) used by the other P450s in the endoplasmic reticulum. Although numerous studies have been published involving mitochondrial P450 systems, the experimental conditions vary considerably. We compared human Adx and bovine Adx, a commonly used component, and found very similar catalytic activities in reactions catalyzed by human P450s 11B2, 27A1, and 27C1. Binding constants of 6–200 nM were estimated for Adx binding to these P450s using microscale thermophoresis. All P450 catalytic reactions were saturated at 10 μM Adx, and higher concentrations were not inhibitory up to at least 50 μM. Collectively these studies demonstrate the tight binding of Adx (both human and bovine) to AdR and to several mitochondrial P450s and provide guidance for optimization of Adx-dependent P450 reactions.
Keywords: Cytochrome P450, CYP, adrenodoxin, steroid biosynthesis, NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase, NADPH-P450 reductase
1. Introduction
The cytochrome P450 (P450 or CYP) family of heme monooxygenases has been of continued interest since the discovery of the enzyme more than 50 years ago [1, 2]. With the sequencing of the human genome, the number of CYP genes was determined to be 57, and these enzymes play various roles in the body [3]. Most frequently they catalyze the insertion of a single atom from molecular oxygen into a C-H bond, using electrons supplied by NADPH, although they can perform reactions as wide-ranging as epoxidation, desaturation, C-C bond cleavage, and ring expansion [4, 5]. In the liver, they are responsible for the activation and detoxication of xenobiotics, while in the adrenals, gonads, and placenta they catalyze key reactions in steroid hormone biosynthetic pathways [6]. P450 enzymes that metabolize exogenous chemicals, such as P450s 2C9 and 3A4, are generally localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and are dependent on the flavoprotein NADPH-P450 reductase (POR) for the transfer of electrons to support mixed-function oxidation. P450s in the mitochondria rely instead on a two-component electron transfer system comprised of a [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin, adrenodoxin (Adx), and an FAD-dependent ferredoxin reductase, NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase (AdR). Deficiencies in any of the mitochondrial P450s can cause disease states in humans involving not only steroidogenesis but also vitamin D homeostasis [6–8]. Of the six P450 enzymes involved in steroid hormone biosythesis [3, 6], three (P450s 11A1, 11B1, and 11B2) are mitochrondrial P450s that use the Adx pathway. The remaining mitochondrial P450s also catalyze reactions in the bile acid pathway (P450 27A1 performs sterol 27-hydroxylation), vitamin D3 hydroxylation in the kidney (P450s 24A1 and 27B1), and retinoid desaturation in the skin (P450 27C1).
Because transfer of electrons to the P450 heme is mediated by the interaction of AdR, Adx, and the P450 itself, there has been significant interest over the years regarding the affinity and thermodynamics of the interactions between these components. The question of what complexes these form and how the formation affects the rate and specificity of electron transfer has been of interest since the first amino sequence determination of bovine Adx [9] and subsequent cloning and expression in Escherichia coli [10]. The first crystal structure of Adx was suggestive of dimerization [11]. More recently, Ivanov and associates used surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to estimate Kd values for POR and Adx interactions with 12 different P450s [12]. The effect of substrate binding on the P450-Adx complex has been examined recently both by SPR [13] and solution NMR [14, 15]. Solution NMR indicated that substrate binding altered the interaction of microsomal P450 17A1 with another auxiliary protein, cytochrome b5 [16], which is consistent with more recent SPR studies [13]. In contrast, no effect of substrate was observed on P450/POR and P450/Adx binding with microsomal P450 17A1, P450 21A2, and P450 2C19 by SPR [13], while solution NMR showed that the mitochondrial P450 24A1/Adx interaction was sensitive to the presence of specific substrates [15]. These studies, taken together, indicate that Adx may play a role beyond simple delivery of electrons to P450s and, as a corollary, may additionally affect substrate binding and P450 conformation.
Studies of mitochondrial P450-catalyzed reactions have used a variety of experimental conditions in the interactions with Adx. Many of the early studies with Adx were done with the bovine protein, particularly prior to heterologous expression [17–21]. Taking P450 11B2 as an example, both (recombinant) human [22–24] and bovine [12, 25, 26] sources of Adx have been commonly used in catalytic studies. The concentrations of Adx and AdR used are generally described with regard to the concentration of P450 in a simple molar ratio. For typical steady-state enzyme kinetic studies, the Adx:P450 ratio has varied from 8:1 [24] to 60:1 [23] with Adx concentrations varying from 1 μM [25] to 30 μM [26].
In this work, we sought to understand the effects of these experimental variables in studies of mitochondrial P450s with Adx. Specifically, we examined the effects of different sources of Adx and concentrations on enzyme reaction parameters. Thermodynamic binding constants (Kd) for Adx and redox enzymes were estimated utilizing microscale thermophoresis (MST), again comparing the two Adx sources (bovine and human). The two Adx forms interact with the P450s differently, but the effect was found to be rather negligible for most enzyme kinetic studies. These results suggest optimized conditions for the study of interactions between Adx with mitochondrial P450s.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
All chemical reagents were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA) or Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA) and used without further purification unless otherwise noted.
2.2. Recombinant proteins
Bovine Adx and AdR [27], human P450 11B2 [25], human P450 27A1 [28], and human P450 27C1 [29] were all expressed in E. coli and purified as previously described. The plasmid containing human Adx (pLW01) was a gift from Prof. R. Auchus (U. Michigan) [22], and the protein was expressed and purified according to a similar method as bovine Adx [27], with some modifications. Briefly, the plasmid was transformed into Echerichia coli BL21 cells and plated on LBamp agar. A single colony was inoculated into 50 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) media containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and incubated overnight at 37 °C with shaking at 220 rpm. This pre-culture was used to inoculate bulk culture media at a 1:100 v/v dilution (500 mL Terrific Broth (TB) containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm until the OD600 reached approximately 0.6 (~5 h), at which point isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG, 0.4 mM) and trace elements (0.025% v/v) [30] were added, and the temperature and speed were reduced to 26 °C and 150 rpm, respectively. The cell pellet was harvested by centrifugation (3000 × g for 10 min) after a further 24 h of growth. The pelleted cells were resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) buffer containing 20% glycerol (v/v) and 0.1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and sonicated for 8 × 30 s at 70% amplitude. The sonicated cells were then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was loaded onto a DEAE-Sepharose column (2.5 × 10 cm), equilibrated with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM DTT. The column was washed with the same buffer, and the protein was eluted using a linear gradient of KCl (0–200 mM). The fractions containing Adx (as identified by A414 measurements and SDS-PAGE) were pooled, concentrated by centrifugal filtration (MilliporeSigma), and loaded onto a Sephadex G-75 column (2.5 cm × 100 cm) equilibrated with 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) containing EDTA (0.1 mM). The fractions containing Adx (based on A414 measurements) were combined and purity > 95% was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. The total yield was 2,000 nmol of Adx from 3 L of culture, which was then aliquoted and stored at −80 °C.
A P450 27A1 cDNA was purchased as an E. coli codon-optimized g-block, containing a C-terminal His6 tag, from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). Details of the g-block and the primers used for amplification can be found in the Supplementary Material. Using NdeI and HindIII restriction enzyme sites, the cDNA was cut and ligated into the vector pCWori+ [28]. Correct insertion was confirmed by nucleotide sequence analysis (GenHunter, Nashville, TN). The plasmid was transformed into E. coli DH5α cells along with a plasmid for expressing the molecular chaperone GroEL/ES, according to a method described previously for P450 27A1 [28]. A colony was picked, grown in 50 mL of LB media containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 50 μg/mL kanamycin, and incubated overnight at 37 °C at 220 rpm. This starter culture was used to inoculate 3 L of TB media (500 mL/2 L flask) supplemented with antibiotics (vide supra), 1 mM thiamine, trace elements (250 μL/L of culture) [30], and glycerol (4 mL/L culture), at a 1:100 v/v dilution. The resulting cultures were incubated at 37 °C at 220 rpm until the OD600 reached 0.7–0.75 (~2.5 h). Expression was induced by addition of 1 mM IPTG, 1 mM δ-aminolevulinic acid, and 6 mM arabinose. Cultures were incubated for another 48 h at 28 °C and 150 rpm, following which the cells were harvested by centrifugation (3,000 × g for 20 min). The pellet was resuspended in TES buffer (100 mM Tris-acetate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.5 M sucrose and 0.5 mM EDTA) and a total of 150 mg lysozyme was added. Cells were shaken at 4 °C for 45 min and the spheroplasts were harvested by centrifugation (3,000 × g for 20 min). The resulting spheroplasts were resuspended in 100 mL of sonication buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) containing 16% glycerol (v/v), 9 mM magnesium acetate, 100 μM DTT, 1.0 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and two protease inhibitor tablets (Roche)/L of cell culture) and sonicated on ice (8 × 30 s cycles at 70% amplitude). The resulting solution was centrifuged at 6,500 × g for 20 min, and then the recovered supernatant was further centrifuged at 105 × g for 60 min. The pellet was collected and solubilized overnight at 4 °C in 200 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 20% glycerol (v/v), 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT, 0.5 M KCl, and 1.0% sodium cholate (w/v). The homogenate was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min, after which the supernatant was loaded onto a Ni2+-NTA column, previously equilibrated with the solubilization buffer. The column was washed with the same buffer containing 20 mM imidazole, and P450 27A1 was eluted with 200 mM imidazole. The eluted fractions containing P450 27A1 (as confirmed by SDS-PAGE) were dialyzed against 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 20% glycerol (v/v, 24 h with three buffer changes for a total of 4 L). The dialyzed protein was stored at −80 °C until further use.
3. Experimental Procedures
3.1. Catalytic Assays
3.1.1. Bovine AdR
The Adx concentration-dependence of the catalytic activity of bovine AdR was tested with both human and bovine Adx. Reaction solutions were prepared in the wells of a polystyrene 96-well microplate (Greiner Bio-One North America, Monroe, NC). A 200 μL solution was prepared in each well including 0.015 μM AdR, 100 μM horse heart cytochrome c, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and various concentrations of either human or bovine Adx varying from 0.1–150 μM. NADPH (1.1 mM) was added to initiate the reaction, providing reduction equivalents to AdR, which can then reduce Adx. Reduced Adx is able to reduce cytochrome c. The increase in cytochrome c absorbance at 550 nm in this system indirectly reports on the reduction of Adx by AdR. Under these conditions, the reduction of Adx by AdR is the rate-limiting step in this series of reactions [18]. After initiating reactions by addition of NADPH, the absorbance at 550 nm was recorded every 3 s for 4 min using a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). A linear fit to the absorbance over the initial 90 s of the experiment was used to estimate the initial rate of reduction; during this observation period less than 15% of total cytochrome c was reduced. The absorbance changes were converted to reduced cytochrome c concentration using an extinction coefficient of 21,100 M−1 cm−1 [31]. Reactions were performed in duplicate.
3.1.2. Human P450 11B2 assays
The activity of human P450 11B2 with both human and bovine Adx was tested using 11-deoxycorticosterone as the substrate. These assays were performed based on previous work in this laboratory using P450 11B2 [25]. The conditions used for this assay allow for the assay to primarily report on the production of corticosterone because aldosterone and 18-OH corticosterone production is low. Levels of 18-OH corticosterone and aldosterone are below the detection limit of the experiment (2 pmol); whereas, corticosterone production levels are 2.5- to 12-fold higher than the detection limit [25]. Briefly, 500 μL samples (final volume) including 1 nM P450 11B2, 0.5 μM AdR, 50 μM L-α-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (added as lipid vesicles after sonication of a 1 mg/mL stock), 4 μM 11-deoxycorticosterone, and various concentrations (0–100 μM) of either human or bovine Adx were incubated for 5 min at 37 °C (shaking water bath, final concentrations). NADPH was then added to the mixtures at a final concentration of 1.5 mM to initiate the reactions. Reactions were allowed to proceed at 37 °C for 7.5 min before quenching with the addition of 2 mL of ethyl acetate. Steroids in the sample were extracted into the organic solvent and an aliquot was removed, dried under a N2 stream, and then dissolved in a CH3CN:H2O mixture (1:1, v/v). The resulting samples were analyzed using a Waters Acquity UPLC system (Milford, MA), separated with an Acquity BEH C18 UPLC octadecylsilane column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, solvents and gradient conditions previously described [25]), with detection using a photodiode array detector, and quantified using external standards. The production of corticosterone from 11-deoxycorticosterone was analyzed in this study. Assays were done in duplicate.
3.1.3. Human P450 27A1
The activity of human P450 27A1 was assayed in a similar way to that of P450 11B2 described above. The concentration of P450 27A1 was 0.2 μM, and the reaction tested was the oxidation of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. The initial concentration of vitamin D3 used was 20 μM, and the reaction proceeded for 10 min after the addition of NADPH. The reaction samples were processed in a similar way as for the P450 11B2 reactions. The chromatography instrumentation was the same, with changes made for this reaction. The mobile phases used were A (95% H2O, 5% CH3CN, v/v) and B (95% CH3CN, 5% H2O, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The mobile phase linear gradient was: 0–1 min, 50% A (v/v); 5.5 min, 0% A (v/v); 9.5 min, 0% A (v/v); 9.75–11 min, 50% A (v/v). The retention times of vitamin D3 and the 25-hydroxy product were 8.9 and 5.3 min, respectively. The peak area was quantified at a wavelength of 265 nm, based on a standard curve using an authentic standard of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Experiments were performed in duplicate.
3.1.4. Human P450 27C1
The activity of human P450 27C1 was tested in a similar way to P450 11B2 described above and as described previously [32, 33].The concentration of P450 27C1 was 20 nM, and the concentration of L-α-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine was 16 μM. The reaction tested was the oxidation of all-trans retinol to 3,4-dehydroretinol, and the initial concentration of all-trans retinol used was 500 nM. Reactions were initiated with the addition of NADPH (1.5 mM) but quenched by the addition of 1 mL tert-butyl methyl ether containing 20 μM butylated hydroxytoluene after 1 min (to avoid autoxidation artifacts). After drying under a nitrogen stream, samples were dissolved in 50% ethanol (v/v).
Reaction samples were processed in a similar manner as for the P450 11B2 reactions. The chromatography instrumentation was the same with changes made to the method to optimize for this reaction. The mobile phases used were A (95% H2O, 4.9% CH3CN, 0.1% HCO2H (v/v)) and B (95% CH3CN, 4.9% H2O, 0.1% HCO2H (v/v)) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mobile phase linear gradient was: 0–0.1 min, 40% A (v/v); 5–6 min, 25% A (v/v); 6.5–8 min, 0% A (v/v); 8.5–10 min, 40% A (v/v). The retention times of all-trans retinol and the 3,4-dehydroretinol product were 6.6 and 5.2 min, respectively. 3,4-Dehydroretinol formation was identified by co-elution with a commercial standard (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX) and quantification was based on the A350 peak areas. Concentrations of retinoids were determined spectrophotometrically and samples were kept in amber glass vials at all times. Experiments were performed in duplicate.
3.2. Microscale Thermophoresis (MST)
Binding affinity of Adx forms for bovine AdR and human P450s was studied using a Monolith NT.115 MST system (NanoTemper Technologies GmbH, Munich, Germany) in the Vanderbilt Structural Biology Core Facility. Either human or bovine Adx was labeled using a NanoTemper Monolith Protein Labeling Kit RED NHS 2nd Generation, which reacts with amine groups in a protein sample to label the protein with a fluorescent dye (RED) (proprietary). The extent of labeling was determined by a modification of the manufacturer instructions. Briefly, the Adx concentration was initially determined using the extinction coefficient ε414 = 9,800 M−1 cm−1 [34]. Then, dilution of the Adx from the dye addition procedure was determined using the ratio of 280 nm absorbance before and after adding the dye. The 414 nm Adx absorbance band was too faint to be measured with the small reaction volume. The dye concentration in the final reaction volume, after unreacted dye was removed using a desalting spin-column, was determined using the manufacturer-provided extinction coefficient of 195,000 M−1 cm−1. A ratio of [dye]/[Adx] in the final purified sample was used to determine extent of labeling. The kit labeling instructions were modified because initial attempts at labeling resulted in a degree of labeling of ~10%. By increasing the dye-protein incubation time from 30 min to 2 h and increasing the dye:protein ratio from 3.3 to 10, the extent of labeling was increased to ~50%, as determined by UV-visible absorbance measurements at 650 and 280 nm.
MST samples contained 20 nM either RED-labeled bovine Adx or RED-labeled human Adx, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.05% Tween 20 (v/v), and various concentrations of either bovine AdR or the human P450s (100 pM to 39 μM). Samples were loaded into the standard Monolith NT.115 capillaries and tested by MST analysis at 25 °C. The results were analyzed by plotting the baseline-corrected normalized fluorescence (ΔFnorm [%]) versus enzyme concentration. Data from two or three independently pipetted experiments were analyzed using a single site binding model, and the resultant Kd values were averaged with error propagated through the averaging (only one data set was done examining the interaction of bovine Adx with human P450 11B2).
4. Results
4.1. Enzyme catalytic activity dependence on Adx concentration
Steady-state kinetic measurements were made with three human mitochondrial P450 enzymes— P450s 11B2, 27A1, and 27C1—to compare the effectiveness of human and bovine Adx to act as redox mediators with human P450s. In each case the concentration of the P450 enzyme, the initial substrate concentration, and the concentration of bovine AdR were fixed. The concentration of the Adx was varied to examine the concentration-dependence of the observed P450 catalytic rate. Additional experiments to test the ability of bovine AdR to reduce human and bovine Adx were also performed. These reactions were studied indirectly by observing the reduction of cytochrome c by Adx under conditions where the AdR reduction of Adx is rate-limiting (Fig. 1).
Fig 1.

P450-mediated oxidations supported by varying concentrations of either bovine (○---○) or human (●––●) Adx, to hyperbolic plots. (A) P450 11B2 oxidation of 11-deoxycorticosterone to corticosterone; (B) P450 27A1 oxidation of vitamin D3 to 25-hydroxyvitamin D3; (C) P450 27C1 oxidation of retinol to 3,4-dehydroretinol; (D) reduction of cytochrome c by AdR. Rates are presented as nmol product formed min−1 (nmol P450)−1 in Parts A-C and nmol cytochrome c reduced min−1 (nmol AdR)−1 in Part D. Data are shown as points with a hyperbolic fit to the data shown with the lines. Note: Under steady-state conditions of limiting bovine adrenodoxin a rate of 520 nmol cytochrome c reduced min−1 (nmol AdR)−1 was estimated for the reduction of cytochrome c, which can be compared with the pre-steady-state rate of 4.6 s−1 (275 min−1) previously reported for reduction of cytochrome c by a bovine AdrR-Adx complex by Lambeth and Kamin [18].
In each case the observed reaction rate increased with Adx concentration until a maximal rate was achieved, as expected. This relationship was hyperbolic in nature and accordingly the data were fit using a typical Michaelis-Menten equation for enzyme kinetics. This is a different application of the Michaelis-Menten equation than usual because one would typically treat the small molecule being oxidized as the substrate in P450 reactions. However, the reduced Adx acts as the rate-limiting co-substrate, so it can also be treated as the dependent-substrate variable in a Michaelis-Menten analysis. This treatment allows for a comparison of the maximal rate achieved by the enzyme (kcat), the sensitivity of the reaction to Adx concentration (Km,app), and the overall efficiency of the reaction with respect to Adx concentration (kcat/Km,app). The fit parameters from this analysis (Table 1) indicate that in all parameters both bovine and human Adx were equally effective with human P450 11B2 and P450 27C1. A 5-fold increase in kcat/Km,app was observed with bovine Adx when used with human P450 27A1, driven by a 1.5-fold increase in kcat and a 3-fold decrease in Km,app. A similar 2.3-fold increase in kcat/Km,app was observed with human Adx when used with bovine AdR, driven by a decrease in Km,app.
Table 1.
Catalytic parameters from hyperbolic plots of reaction rates versus human and bovine Adx concentrations for P45011B2, 27A1, and 27C1. Rates are presented as nmol product formed min−1 (nmol P450)−1.
| Bovine Adx | Human Adx | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kcat ± SD (min−1) | Km,app ± SD (μM) | kcat/Km,app ± SD (μM−1 min−1) | kcat ± SD (min−1) | Km,app ± SD (μM) | kcat/Km,app ± SD (μM−1 min−1) | |
| P450 11B2 | 160 ± 20 | 0.053 ± 0.006 | 3000 ± 500 | 160 ± 20 | 0.066 ± 0.008 | 2400 ± 400 |
| P450 27A1 | 9.2 ± 0.5 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 28 ± 5 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 5 ± 1 |
| P450 27C1 | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
| AdRa | 520 ± 40 | 3 ± 1 | 160 ± 50 | 520 ± 10 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 360 ± 10 |
Cytochrome c reduction assay
4.2. Estimates of enzyme-Adx dissociation constants by MST
MST was used to measure the dissociation constants (Kd) describing the interaction of both human and bovine Adx with human P450 11B2, human P450 27A1, human P450 27C1, and bovine AdR. In these experiments, Adx used was labeled with a fluorophore by conjugation of an NHS-ester to a free amine, kept at a constant ratio. The concentration of the enzyme was varied within the experiment.
Each MST data set (Fig. 2) was independently fit to a single-site binding model assuming a 1:1 stoichiometry to solve for the dissociation constant. Our analysis was based upon a complex of a single molecule of Adx and P450 (or AdR), although evidence for the interaction of two Adx molecules with P450 11B1 has been presented by Seybert et al. [35]. The Kd values were then averaged with error propagated to produce the values presented in Table 2. For most of the experiments, the multiple trials resulted in reproducible binding isotherm plots. The inter-day amplitude of the isotherm varied significantly among the trials for human P450 27C1 with bovine Adx and bovine AdR with bovine Adx, so in general three trials were averaged for data analysis. Only one successful trial was obtained for the interaction of human P450 11B2 with bovine Adx. Kd values ranged from 6 nM to 200 nM. The bovine and human Adx trials did not result in the same Kd values with the same enzyme. The degree and direction of this variation differs among the enzymes, with human P450 11B2 favoring bovine Adx by 2-fold, human P450 27A1 favoring the human Adx by 4-fold, human P450 27C1 favoring bovine Adx by 7-fold, and bovine AdR favoring bovine Adx by 4-fold. With exception of P450 27C1, these differences in Kd are relatively small and are likely insignificant when we consider that the Kd values are all close to or below the experimental Adx concentration of 20 nM. Despite this potential limitation of the fits, these results indicate tight binding between Adx and its various enzyme redox partners.
Fig. 2.

MST data for binding of P450 11B2 (A & B), P450 27A1 (C & D), P450 27C1 (E & F), and bovine AdR (G, H) with bovine (A, C, E, F) and human (B, D, F, H) Adx. Each trace (shown with different colors) is a different independently determined experiment. The fit is a modified quadratic based on a single-binding site model, provided by the NanoTemper MST Analysis Software.
Table 2.
Dissociation constants for mitochondrial P450s with bovine and human Adx, derived from fitting MST data presented in Fig 2.
| Bovine | Human | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kd ± SD (M) | n | Kd ± SD (M) | n | |
| P450 11B2 | 6 (± 3) × 10−9 | 1 | 1.4 (± 0.5) × 10−8 | 2 |
| P450 27A1 | 2 (± 1) × 10−7 | 2 | 5 (± 2) × 10−8 | 2 |
| P450 27C1 | 3 (± 1) × 10−8 | 3 | 2.2 (± 0.7) × 10−7 | 2 |
| AdR | 1.0 (± 0.4) × 10−8 | 3 | 4 (± 2) × 10−8 | 2 |
n: number of replicates.
5. Discussion
The purpose of this study was to understand how variations in studies of P450- and Adx-catalyzed oxidations of steroids and vitamins affect the results. These variations include the species form of Adx used and the concentration of Adx used. The first issue is whether using bovine or human Adx as the electron carrier in P450 reactions changes the observed reaction kinetics. The primary sequences of the two proteins are very similar (76% identity), with most of the differences in the N-terminal region that is cleaved during mitochondrial transport [22, 27] (https://www//uniprot.org/uniprot/P00257).The recombinant proteins used have an even higher identity of 89.4% (Supplementary Material Fig. S2). Identification of the residues related to the small differences of the two Adx proteins in the catalytic activities (Fig. 1) can only be speculative. In an ideal experimental setup, the concentration of Adx would be saturating and not be rate-limiting, so the most useful steady-state kinetic parameter to compare is kcat. With the four enzymes that we tested, the kcat values observed when using human or bovine Adx were less than 2-fold different, a fairly small difference indicating that either form of Adx is an effective electron transporter for these human enzymes (three different human P450s plus bovine AdR). Only the P450 27A1 data indicates a difference in kcat between the two forms of Adx. The bovine Adx yielded a 1.5-fold higher kcat value with P450 27A1.
The second variation among published studies utilizing P450 enzymes is the concentration of Adx used. Decreased P450 activity was not seen at even very high Adx concentrations (100–200 μM). The sensitivity of each studied reaction to Adx concentration is reflected in the measured Km,app values (Table 1); however, these values are not directly comparable as the concentration of the P450 used in each reaction varied (or the AdR in the cytochrome c reduction assays). The enzyme system used at the lowest concentration (P450 11B2, 1 nM) required the least amount of Adx (Km,app ~ 0.06 μM). Despite the variation in the P450 concentration in the other P450-catalyzed reactions, the reactions with P450 27A1 and P450 27C1 produced similar Km,app values of ~1 μM, possibly indicating that there may be other factors determining these Km,app values. The reduction of Adx by AdR must also occur for the P450-catalyzed reactions to occur, so the Adx concentration-dependence of this reaction was independently examined. The resultant Km,app values for the AdR reactions were similar to those from the P450 27A1 and P450 27C1 reactions,, i.e. with human Adx a Km,app of 1.4 μM and bovine Adx a Km,app of 3.3 μM. Overall, the answer to the question “How much Adx is optimal?” appears to vary by P450 and reaction conditions but in general 10 μM (bovine or human Adx) was found to be optimal for activity assays using sub-μM P450 concentrations.
MST was used to quantify the equilibrium binding dissociation constant (Kd) for each Adx form with the enzymes studied (Fig. 2, Table 2). To our knowledge (and a PubMed search, July 2020), microscale thermophoresis has not been utilized with P450 enzymes. In all cases, the measured Kd was low, ≤200 nM, indicating relatively tight interactions between the proteins. These values are similar in scale to those obtained by Yablokov et al. using an SPR approach [12], who reported Kd values from 10–80 nM with three different mitochondrial P450s. The only direct comparison of the measurements that can be made is between human P450 11B2 and its interaction with bovine Adx. Yablokov and coworkers reported a Kd of 80 ± 4 nM [12], based on SPR, compared to our value of 6 ± 3 nM (Table 2). The difference in observed Kd is probably due to the technique used, and both studies are consistent with very strong interactions between P450s and Adx. Schiffler et al. [35] reported a Kd value of 0.9 μM for an AdR-Adx complex and 13 nM for an Adx-P450 11A1 complex, using SPR methods. SPR utilizes one protein partner immobilized on the surface of a chip in order to determine the Kd, whereas MST is performed in solution, allowing for free diffusion of the protein partners (i.e., closer to native conditions). Having a protein attached to a surface limits its conformational freedom and can lead to a change in binding interactions, and a major problem is due to “mass transfer,” the diffusion of the ligand from the solution though the matrix to reach the receptor [36]. Kd estimates of 160 nM for Adx-P450 11A1 [19] and 5 nM for AdR-Adx [34] have been made using spectroscopic methods.
A direct correlation between the Kd values and the calculated Km,app values was not observed (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.14), which is not surprising in that we only examined the interactions of oxidized Adx with the enzymes. It is possible that reduced Adx would have different binding affinities for P450s and AdR as well; this is a possible driving factor for the entire P450-Adx-AdR shuttle mechanism [21]. Further, the interactions of a P450 with Adx could be affected by the presence of individual substrates, in that Adx has been show to affect substrate affinities [25] and thermodynamic box analysis [37] would indicate that, as a corollary, substrate binding can affect Adx affinity, as reported for P450 24A1 [15]. The exact meaning of Km,app here is unknown, and a high affinity for either AdR or a P450 could sequester it away from the other redox partner. Therefore, it is not possible at this point to predict the ideal concentrations of Adx and AdR for steady-state analysis of all mitochondrial P450-catalyzed reactions. In practice, when a low concentration of P450 is used (≤500 nM) with an AdR concentration of 500 nM, Adx concentrations of 1–20 μM have been used, depending on the P450 being utilized and its concentration [22–26, 32]. For studies using higher concentrations of P450 (≥ 1 μM), e.g. for pre-steady-state experiments [25], higher concentrations of AdR and Adx are required and should be optimized first.
6. Conclusions
This goal of this work was to determine the effects of several experimental variables on reactions catalyzed by mitochondrial P450 enzymes, specifically understanding the effects of redox partner source and redox partner concentration. To achieve optimal enzyme catalysis, the Adx form utilized can be checked for optimal activity, but both bovine and human Adx led to rates within a factor of two. Regardless of the species origin of Adx, the concentration of Adx used in these studies must be sufficiently high to support optimal turnover rates, i.e. 5–10 μM for typical steady-state kinetic experiments utilizing mitochondrial P450s (with the P450 concentration ≤ 500 nM).
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
Human and bovine adrenodoxin behaved similarly in supporting human mitochondrial cytochrome P450 reactions.
Binding constants were estimated for adrenodoxin (Adx) and P450s and NADPH-Adx reductase using microscale thermophoresis.
A concentration of 10 μM adrenodoxin was optimal for all reactions examined using sub-μM concentrations of P450s.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 GM118122 (F.P.G.), T32 ES007028 (F. P. G., M. J. R., S. M. G.), and F31 AR077386 (S. M. G.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The authors thank Ethan Harris for his assistance in preparing the AdR-cytochrome c enzyme assays, C. J. Wilkey and T. T. N. Phan for purifying some of the enzymes, and K. Trisler for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
Abbreviations:
- Adx
adrenodoxin
- AdR
NADPH-adrenodoxin reductase
- b5
cytochrome b5
- DH
dehydrogenase
- G-6-P
glucose 6-phosphate
- MST
microscale thermophoresis
- P450 or CYP
cytochrome P450
- POR
NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase
- SPR
surface plasmon resonance
References
- [1].Omura T, Sato R, A new cytochrome in liver microsomes, J. Biol. Chem 237 (1962) 1375–1376 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Ortiz de Montellano PR, Ed., Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry, 4th ed., Springer, New York, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Guengerich FP, Human cytochrome P450 enzymes, in: Ortiz de Montellano PR (Ed.), Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry, 4th ed., Springer, New York, 2015, pp. 523–785. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Guengerich FP, Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity, Chem. Res. Toxicol 14(6) (2001) 611–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Guengerich FP, Yoshimoto FK, Formation and cleavage of C-C bonds by enzymatic oxidation-reduction reactions, Chem. Rev 118(14) (2018) 6573–6655. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Auchus RJ, Miller WL, P450 enzymes in steroid processing, in: Ortiz de Montellano PR (Ed.), Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry, 4th ed., Springer, New York, 2015, pp. 851–879. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Nebert DW, Russell DW, Clinical importance of the cytochromes P450, Lancet 360 (2002) 1155–1162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Rendic S, Guengerich FP, Human cytochrome P450 enzyme 5–51 as targets of drugs, natural, and environmental compounds: Mechanisms, induction, and inhibition—toxic effects and benefits, Drug Metab. Rev 50 (2018) 256–342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Tanaka M, Haniu M, Yasunobu KT, Kimura T, The amino acid sequence of bovine adrenodoxin, J. Biol. Chem 248(4) (1973) 1141–57 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Uhlmann H, Beckert V, Schwarz D, Bernhardt R, Expression of bovine adrenodoxin in E. coli and site-directed mutagenesis of [2Fe-2S] cluster ligands, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 188(3) (1992) 1131–1138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Pikuleva IA, Tesh K, Waterman MR, Kim Y, The tertiary structure of full-length bovine adrenodoxin suggests functional dimers, Arch. Biochem. Biophys 373 (2000) 44–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Yablokov EO, Sushko TA, Ershov PV, Florinskaya AV, Gnedenko OV, Shkel TV, Grabovec IP, Strushkevich NV, Kaluzhskiy LA, Usanov SA, Gilep AA, Ivanov AS, A large-scale comparative analysis of affinity, thermodynamics and functional characteristics of interactions of twelve cytochrome P450 isoforms and their redox partners, Biochimie 162 (2019) 156–166. 10.1016/j.biochi.2019.04.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Ershov PV, Yablokov EO, Florinskaya AV, Mezentsev YV, Kaluzhskiy LA, Tumilovich AM, Gilep AA, Usanov SA, Ivanov AS, SPR-Based study of affinity of cytochrome P450s/redox partners interactions modulated by steroidal substrates, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 187 (2019) 124–129. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kumar A, Wilderman PR, Tu C, Shen S, Qu J, Estrada DF, Evidence of allosteric coupling between substrate binding and Adx recognition in the vitamin D carbon-24 hydroxylase CYP24A1, Biochemistry 59(15) (2020) 1537–1548. 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kumar A, Estrada DF, Specificity of the redox complex between cytochrome P450 24A1 and adrenodoxin relies on carbon-25 hydroxylation of vitamin-D substrate, Drug Metab. Disops 47(9) (2019) 974–982. 10.1124/dmd.119.087759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Estrada DF, Laurence JS, Scott EE, Substrate-modulated cytochrome P450 17A1 and cytochrome b5 interactions revealed by NMR, J. Biol. Chem 288(23) (2013) 17008–17018. 10.1074/jbc.M113.468926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Chu J-W, Kimura T, Studies on adrenal steroid hydroxylases: molecular and catalytic properties of adrenodoxin reductase (a flavoprotein), J. Biol. Chem 248(6) (1973) 2089–2094 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Lambeth JD, Kamin H, Adrenodoxin reductase and adrenodoxin: mechanisms of reduction of ferricyanide and cytochrome c, J. Biol. Chem 252 (1977) 2908–2917 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Katagiri M, Takikawa O, Sato H, Suhara K, Formation of a cytochrome P-450scc-adrenodoxin complex, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 77(2) (1977) 804–809. 10.1016/S0006-291X(77)80049-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lambeth JD, Seybert DW, Kamin H, Ionic effects on adrenal steroidogenic electron transport. The role of adrenodoxin as an electron shuttle, J. Biol. Chem 254(15) (1979) 7255–7264 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Beilke D, Weiss R, Löhr F, Pristovsek P, Hannemann F, Bernhardt R, Rüterjans H, A new electron transport mechanism in mitochondrial steroid hydroxylase systems based on structural changes upon the reduction of adrenodoxin, Biochemistry 41(25) (2002) 7969–7978. 10.1021/bi0160361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Peng HM, Auchus RJ, Molecular recognition in mitochondrial cytochromes P450 that catalyze the terminal steps of corticosteroid biosynthesis, Biochemistry 56(17) (2017) 2282–2293. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Peng HM, Barlow C, Auchus RJ, Catalytic modulation of human cytochromes P450 17A1 and P450 11B2 by phospholipid, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 181 (2018) 63–72. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Strushkevich N, Gilep AA, Shen L, Arrowsmith CH, Edwards AM, Usanov SA, Park HW, Structural insights into aldosterone synthase substrate specificity and targeted inhibition, Mol. Endocrinol 27(2) (2013) 315–324. 10.1210/me.2012-1287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Reddish MJ, Guengerich FP, Human cytochrome P450 11B2 produces aldosterone by a processive mechanism due to the lactol form of the intermediate 18-hydroxycorticosterone, J. Biol. Chem 294(35) (2019) 12975–12991. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Hobler A, Kagawa N, Hutter MC, Hartmann MF, Wudy SA, Hannemann F, Bernhardt R, Human aldosterone synthase: recombinant expression in E. coli and purification enables a detailed biochemical analysis of the protein on the molecular level, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol 132(1–2) (2012) 57–65. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Yoshimoto FK, Jung IJ, Goyal S, Gonzalez E, Guengerich FP, Isotope-labeling studies support the electrophilic Compound I iron active species, FeO3+, for the carbon-carbon bond cleavage reaction of the cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, cytochrome P450 11A1, J. Am. Chem. Soc 138(37) (2016) 12124–12141. 10.1021/jacs.6b04437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Acimovic J, Goyal S, Kosir R, Golicnik M, Perse M, Belic A, Urlep Z, Guengerich FP, Rozman D, Cytochrome P450 metabolism of the post-lanosterol intermediates explains enigmas of cholesterol synthesis, Sci. Rep 6 (2016) 28462. 10.1038/srep28462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Wu Z-L Bartleson CJ, Ham AJ, Guengerich FP, Heterologous expression, spurification, and properties of human cytochrome P450 27C1, Arch. Biochem. Biophys 445(1) (2006) 138–146. 10.1016/j.abb.2005.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Sandhu P, Baba T, Guengerich FP, Expression of modified cytochrome P450 2C10 (2C9) in Escherichia coli, purification, and reconstitution of catalytic activity, Arch. Biochem. Biophys 306(2) (1993) 443–450. 10.1006/abbi.1993.1536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Massey V, The microestimation of succinate and the extinction coefficient of cytochrome c, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 34 (1959) 255–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Kramlinger VM, Nagy LD, Fujiwara R, Johnson KM, Phan TT, Xiao Y, Enright JM, Toomey MB, Corbo JC, Guengerich FP, Human cytochrome P450 27C1 catalyzes 3,4-desaturation of retinoids, FEBS Lett. 590(9) (2016) 1304–1312. 10.1002/1873-3468.12167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Johnson KM, Phan TTN, Albertolle ME, Guengerich FP, Human mitochondrial cytochrome P450 27C1 is localized in skin and preferentially desaturates trans-retinol to 3,4-dehydroretinol, J. Biol. Chem 292(33) (2017) 13672–13687. 10.1074/jbc.M116.773937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Schiffler B, Zöllner A, Bernhardt R, Stripping down the mitochondrial cholesterol hydroxylase system, a kinetics study, J. Biol. Chem 279(33) (2004) 34269–34276. 10.1074/jbc.M402798200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Seybert DW, Lambeth JD, Kamin H, The participation of a second molecule of adrenodoxin in cytochrome P-450-catalyzed 11β hydroxylation, J. Biol. Chem 253(23) (1978) 8355–8358 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Johnson KA, Kinetic Analysis for the New Enzymology, 1st ed., KinTek Corp., Austin TX, pp 252–253. [Google Scholar]
- [37].Kyte J, Mechanism in Protein Chemistry, 1st ed., Garland, New York, 1995, pp 145–255. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
