Abstract
Purpose of Review
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major and increasing health burden, with the potential to overwhelm hepatology services. However, only a minority of patients develop advanced liver disease. The challenge is early identification of patients at risk of progression. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the genetic predisposition to NAFLD, and its implications for prognostication and risk stratification.
Recent Findings
PNPLA3-I148M is the most robustly associated genetic variant with NAFLD. Recently, variants in TM6SF2, MBOAT7, GCKR and HSD17B13 have also been implicated. NAFLD is a complex disease, and any one genetic variant alone is insufficient for risk stratification, but combining multiple genetic variants with other parameters is a promising strategy.
Summary
It is anticipated that, in the near future, analysis of data from large-scale prospective cohorts will reveal NAFLD subtypes and enable the development of prognostic models. This will facilitate risk stratification of patients, enabling optimisation of resources to effectively manage the NAFLD epidemic.
Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Genetic, Risk stratification
Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most common liver disease in Europe and the United States and affects an estimated 25% of the global population [1], increasing to 55% in those with type 2 diabetes [2]. Although the majority of patients do not develop clinically significant liver disease, the high prevalence means that NAFLD is a heavy healthcare burden [3, 4]. It is already the second leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States [5], with mortality expected to more than double by 2030 [6].
NAFLD is characterized by steatosis (>5% hepatocytes) in the absence of significant alcohol intake or secondary causes (e.g. steatotic drugs); and encompasses a spectrum of disease ranging from simple steatosis through steatohepatitis (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH: steatosis plus inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning) to fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is considerable heterogeneity in disease phenotype, and the natural history and risk of progression to clinically significant liver disease are uncertain. Patients may have stable disease, progress slowly or rapidly, or even regress [7]; some will develop HCC [8] (Fig. 1).
Understanding which patients are at risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality is essential. Firstly, risk stratification of patients to appropriate follow up is necessary to manage the burden of disease. Secondly, subtyping patients based on risk of progressive disease will facilitate baseline parameter standardization in clinical trials, enabling identification of effective treatments [9]. Thirdly, understanding individualized risk will help clinicians select those patients most likely to benefit from new drug therapies, as they become available.
NAFLD Pathogenesis
NAFLD is a complex disease resulting from interplay of genetic, environmental, metabolic and microbial factors. The rising prevalence of NAFLD is linked to the increasing trends in obesity and type 2 diabetes, resulting from changes in dietary patterns and sedentary lifestyles [10]. NAFLD is closely linked to the metabolic syndrome, a cluster of conditions including central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and hyperglycaemia [11]. The major source of hepatic lipid is through lipolysis of adipose tissue [12]. Basal lipolysis is enhanced in obesity, leading to increased delivery of free fatty acids to the liver and skeletal muscle [13]. In turn, this may promote insulin resistance [13, 14]. Secondary sources of hepatic lipid are de novo lipogenesis from excess dietary sugars, and dietary fat [12].
Within the liver, free fatty acids are metabolized by mitochondrial beta-oxidation or incorporated into triglycerides, for export as very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) or sequestering into lipid droplets [15]. When the liver’s capacity to metabolize free fatty acids is exceeded, harmful lipid species may be formed, which can activate lipotoxic pathways leading to hepatocellular injury and driving progression towards NASH [15–18].
Fibrosis, or scarring, results from a dysregulated wound healing response to repeated hepatocellular injury. Inflammatory mediators activate hepatic stellate cells to myofibroblasts, which migrate into the liver parenchyma and secrete the collagen-rich extracellular matrix that characterizes fibrosis [19]. At the same time, mechanisms for fibrolysis are inhibited, leading to a net increase in scarring [19]. Ultimately, this leads to cirrhosis, characterized by thick, fibrous septae and architectural distortion, which predisposes to the complications of portal hypertension, organ failure and HCC. With removal of the injurious agent, fibrolysis may be favoured, and even cirrhosis can regress [20].
Disease Progression
Previously, simple steatosis, without evidence of NASH, was thought to be a benign condition, with no risk of progression to clinically significant liver disease. However, there have been several studies and systemic analyses evaluating disease progression with paired liver biopsies, which challenge this assumption.
Staging of NAFLD fibrosis is usually assessed using the NASH Clinical Research Network histological scoring system [21]. This ranges from no fibrosis (stage 0), through mild (stage 1), moderate (stage 2), and advanced fibrosis (stage 3; bridging fibrosis, spanning portal-to-portal or portal-to-central spaces), to cirrhosis (stage 4).
In a large meta-analysis, Singh et al. demonstrated that 39.1% of those with steatosis but no evidence of NASH developed progressive fibrosis, with an average progression rate of one fibrosis stage every 14 years [7]. On average, patients with NASH progressed twice as fast. Importantly, they identified a subgroup of ‘rapid progressors’, with one in five progressors advancing from no fibrosis at baseline to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis over a mean 5.9 years [7]. More recent studies have also demonstrated progression to advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis in around 20% of patients with baseline steatosis without evidence of NASH, over an average follow up of 4 to 8 years [22, 23]. Overall, 34% of patients have progressive disease, 43% have stable disease and 22% will regress [7].
However, many of these studies are retrospective, performed in tertiary centres, and limited by inherent selection bias in patients undergoing repeated liver biopsy. Therefore, it may be difficult to extrapolate these findings to the general population. To address this, Loomba et al. studied a large, real-world cohort of patients in the United States, and identified that 39% of those with an initial diagnosis of NAFLD progressed to advanced liver disease (cirrhosis, liver transplant or HCC) over an 8 year study period [24]. It has been argued that this may overestimate the risk of progression to advanced liver disease, due to the low prevalence of NAFLD (5.7%; perhaps due to underdiagnosis) and older age (≥65 years; favouring fibrosis progression) of the study cohort [25]. Other population-based studies are currently underway to ascertain the prevalence of chronic liver disease and identify population subgroups at highest risk of progressive fibrosis [25].
Assessing the Disease Stage
Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing NASH and staging fibrosis. However, it is limited by sampling error (liver pathology can be heterogeneous, and biopsy only samples approximately 1/50,000th of the liver), and inter-observer variability [26]. It is also associated with cost, inconvenience, and risk to the patient, including very rarely, a risk of death [26]. Moreover, it has been suggested that rather than following a linear course, NASH activity may fluctuate over time, and therefore, a singular liver biopsy may not accurately reflect disease severity [27].
For these reasons, there is a major research focus to identify and validate non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers. Several have been developed, including specific blood biomarkers (e.g. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test); combined scores based on clinical data and standard laboratory investigations (e.g. NAFLD Fibrosis Score); and imaging modalities (e.g. transient elastography, Fibroscan). Whilst currently available biomarkers are useful for ruling out advanced fibrosis, they perform less well at diagnosing cirrhosis and discriminating between fibrosis stages [28]. This means that many patients still require a liver biopsy for an accurate diagnosis.
Currently, the British Society for Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Association for Study of the Liver - Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado (EASL-ALEH) guidelines advocate using non-invasive biomarkers to assess advanced fibrosis in NAFLD [29, 30]. Patients are then dichotomised into those at low or high risk of advanced fibrosis. Patients at low risk are managed in primary care, with repeat assessment of fibrosis risk every 2 to 5 years; patients at high risk are referred to hepatology services for further assessment [29].
Liver fibrosis is the strongest predictor of liver-related and all-cause mortality in NAFLD [31–33]. This underpins the current diagnostic pathway, with only patients at high risk of advanced fibrosis referred to hepatology services. Liver disease is typically asymptomatic until complications develop. The majority of patients with cirrhosis are first diagnosed during a hospital admission with decompensated disease [34]. Identifying asymptomatic patients with cirrhosis would allow opportunity for monitoring and treatment for complications, including surveillance for varices and HCC. However, the current pathway is suboptimal. Firstly, patients with low risk of advanced fibrosis who will never go on to develop clinically significant liver disease may be needlessly followed up, creating unnecessary workload and potentially fuelling health related anxiety. Secondly, patients at high risk of fibrosis progression may miss the opportunity for intensive management to minimize their risk of developing cirrhosis. To address this, we need methods of identifying those patients with early disease who are destined to progress.
Although HCC typically develops on a background of cirrhosis, in NAFLD it can occur in non-cirrhotics. Up to 49% of NAFLD-related HCC occurs in patients without background cirrhosis [8]. NAFLD-related HCC presents late, with a more advanced tumour stage, and a poorer prognosis [35]. Currently, there is no recommendation for HCC surveillance in patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis [36]. Understanding which patients are most at risk, may allow for earlier diagnosis and improvement in outcomes.
Predicting Risk: Key Genes
PNPLA3
Genetic risk for NAFLD susceptibility is suggested by ethnic variability [37], increased risk with a parental history [38], and twin studies [39, 40]. Notably, a twin study in the United States has shown that the heritability of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis is around 50% [40]. Genome wide association studies (GWAS) look for links between common genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) and disease phenotypes. Over the last decade, a number of GWAS have revealed genetic variants associated with NAFLD. The first, by Romeo et al., identified that a SNP (rs738409) in the gene encoding patin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) was strongly associated with hepatic steatosis and inflammation (assessed by liver transanimases) [41••]. The rs738409 variant is a cytosine to guanine substitution, which results in a switch from isoleucine to methionine at residue 148 (I148M). PNPLA3 is predominantly expressed in the liver and retina [42]. In vitro, PNPLA3 catalyses the hydrolysis of triglycerides [43]. Its catalytic activity is disrupted by the I148M mutation. However, Pnpla33 knockout mice do not develop hepatic steatosis [44]. Therefore, PNPLA3-I148-mediated steatosis is not thought to result from a simple loss-of-function. Instead, PNPLA3-I148M resists degradation and accumulates on lipid droplets [45], where it is thought to sequester the lipase co-factor comparative gene identification-58 (CGI-58), thereby indirectly inhibiting other lipases [46, 47].
PNPLA3 is more highly expressed in hepatic stellate cells in the liver, where it is also involved in the metabolism of intracellular lipid droplets [42]. Quiescent hepatic stellate cells store retinol in the form of retinol palmitate. PNPLA3 has been shown to hydrolyse retinol palmitate and promote the release of retinol from hepatic stellate cells [42]. Hepatic stellate cells are activated to myofibroblasts in response to liver injury. This activation process is associated with loss of their intracellular lipid droplets [48]. The PNPLA3-I148M variant is associated with a reduction in lipid droplet metabolism [42], and a more inflammatory and fibrogenic phenotype in hepatic stellate cells in vitro [49].
PNPLA3-I148M has subsequently been associated with all aspects of NAFLD, including age at diagnosis [50]; hepatic steatosis [51]; disease severity [51]; fibrosis stage [51]; and HCC [52]. Most recently, in the largest GWAS on histologically characterized NAFLD, PNPLA3-I148M was confirmed to be associated with the full spectrum of disease [53••].
Interestingly, carriage of the PNPLA3-I148M variant confers a poorer prognosis in other liver diseases including alcohol-related liver disease [54], and autoimmune hepatitis [55]. Alcohol excess causes hepatic steatosis, and therefore, in alcohol-related liver disease, PNPLA3-I148M may increase risk of progression through a shared mechanism with NAFLD. However, in autoimmune hepatitis the effect of PNPLA3-I148M was seemingly unrelated to hepatic steatosis, suggesting alternative mechanisms of action [55].
Genotyping for the PNPLA3-I148M variant is not recommended as a singular test for risk stratification of NAFLD or HCC [36, 50, 52]. Indeed, its effects are modulated by interactions with environmental factors and other gene variants. For example, its effect is potentiated by adiposity: Stender et al. showed that homozygosity for PNPLA3-I148M variant was associated with hepatic steatosis in 18% of lean individuals compared with 84% in the very obese [56]. PNPLA3-I148M is also modified by interaction with other genetic polymorphisms. Donati et al. discovered that an additional polymorphism in the PNPLA3 gene, rs2294918 G > A encoding the E434K protein variant, ameliorated the effect of PNPLA3-I134M on development of NASH by reducing its expression [57].
TM6SF2
A polymorphism (rs58542926 A > G) in the transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) gene is associated with hepatic steatosis and progressive fibrosis [53, 58–60]. The genetic variant results in a substitution of lysine for glutamate at residue 167 [59]. The function of the protein was unknown. However, recent studies in mice have revealed that loss of Tm6sf22 is associated with reduced hepatic lipid secretion via VLDL, with excess lipid accumulating in hepatocellular droplets [61]. When fed a normal diet, the Tm6sf2 knockout mice developed hepatic steatosis, elevated liver enzymes and hypocholesterolaemia, recapitulating the human phenotype [61]. Interestingly, loss of Tm6sf22 was associated with a marked reduction in expression of PNPLA3 [61]. Notably, the TM6SF2 variant is associated with lower levels of circulating total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, and is protective against cardiovascular disease [60, 62]. Therefore, targeting TM6SF2 therapeutically may not be viable in NAFLD.
MBOAT7
The rs641738 C > T polymorphism in the membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 7 (MBOAT7) gene was initially identified as a genetic modifier of risk for alcohol-related cirrhosis [54]. Subsequently, it was shown to be associated with hepatic steatosis, and severity of NAFLD-related necroinflammation and fibrosis [63]. More recently, it has been associated with NAFLD-related HCC, particularly in non-cirrhotics [64]. However, others have not found evidence of an association between MBOAT7 and NAFLD [53, 65].
The MBOAT7 gene encodes the enzyme lysophosphatidylinositol acyltransferase 1 (LPIAT1), which catalyses the incorporation of arachidonic acid into phosphatidylinositol [66]. The rs641738 variant is associated with a reduction in both mRNA and protein MBOAT7/LPIAT1 levels [63], but the mechanisms linking this to the development of NAFLD are unclear. Recently, Tanaka et al. have discovered a novel pathway. They demonstrated that loss of MBOAT7/LPIAT1 is associated with increased triglyceride synthesis and accumulation in hepatocytes, secondary to increased phosphatidylinositol turnover resulting in increased production of diacylglycerol, a substrate for triglyceride synthesis [67]. In addition, loss of MBOAT7/LPIAT1 in hepatic stellate cells was associated with a more fibrogenic phenotype [67].
On the contrary, Thangapandi et al. demonstrated that hepatocyte-specific Mboat7 deletion in mice is associated with increased hepatocyte cholesteryl esters but not triglycerides [68]. In addition, they discovered that hepatocyte-specific Mboat7deficient mice develop hepatic fibrosis in the absence of inflammation when fed a NAFLD-inducing diet. Similarly, in patients with a BMI ≤ 35, carriage of the rs641738 polymorphism was associated with hepatic fibrosis independent of inflammation [68].
GCKR
In the liver, glucokinase regulatory protein (GKRP) regulates the activity of glucokinase, depending on the glycaemic levels. In low glucose conditions, GKRP binds to, and sequesters, glucokinase in the hepatocyte nucleus [69]. Whereas in high glucose conditions, GKRP is released from glucokinase, allowing its translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [69]. Cytosolic glucokinase activates glucose storage pathways including glycogen synthesis and de novo lipogenesis [70]. Counterintuitively, overexpressing GKRP in diabetic mice results in decreased fasting blood glucose levels and improved insulin sensitivity [69]. It is proposed that GKRP may also act to stabilize glucokinase protein, thereby leading to increased levels and activity [69].
The SNP rs1260326 in the GCKR gene encodes a C to T substitution, which results in a switch from proline to leucine at residue 446 (P446L) [71]. Functionally, this attenuates the capacity of GCKR to inhibit glucokinase [70]. Initially, the GCKR-P446L variant was linked to increased triglyceride levels, but reduced fasting glucose, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes risk [72]. Subsequently, it has been associated with hepatic steatosis [53, 71]. A further SNP in the GCKR gene (rs780094) has also been shown to associate with NAFLD and fibrosis severity [73–75]. However, from studies in type 2 diabetes, these two SNPs are in strong linkage disequilibrium [76, 77].
HSD17B13
Hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 13 (HSD17B13) is a liver-specific, lipid droplet associated protein [78, 79], with retinol dehydrogenase activity in vitro [53, 80]. It is upregulated in human liver tissue in NAFLD, and its overexpression results in the development of hepatic steatosis in mice [79]. Several studies have now reported that loss-of-function variants in HSD17B13 are protective against the development of NASH and NAFLD cirrhosis [53, 80, 81]. However, the mechanisms underlying this remain to be elucidated.
Polygenic Risk Scores
NAFLD is a complex disease, therefore, it is logical that combing genetic variants into a risk score will improve prognostic accuracy over a singular genetic variant. Recently, Gellert-Kristensen et al. demonstrated that a genetic risk score, combining the three genetic variants in PNPLA3, TM6SF2 and HSD17B13, was associated with risk of cirrhosis and HCC in fatty liver disease (both NAFLD and alcohol-related) in the general population [82]. The score ranged from 0 to 6 depending on the number of risk alleles; a score of 5 or 6 was associated with a 12-fold increased risk of cirrhosis and a 29-fold increased risk of HCC [82]. Although, of note, only 0.5% of the study population scored a 5 or 6 [82].
In their editorial, Pfeiffer et al. demonstrated that, despite its strong association, Gellert-Kristensen et al.’s genetic risk score has limited usefulness as a singular test for risk stratification, due to its low positive predictive value (0.003 for cirrhosis and 0.0008 for HCC for score ≥ 4 in the UK population) [83]. However, it is anticipated that risk prediction scores will be used in confirmed NAFLD (rather than the general population), to stratify patients to appropriate follow up, and target individuals for novel therapeutics and enhanced surveillance. It is likely that genetic risk variants will need to be combined with other variables, such as clinical parameters, to improve score performance [83]. Similarly a genetic risk score including variants in PNPLA3, TM6SF2, HSD17B13 and GCKR found a significant association with steatosis, steatohepatitis and fibrosis in a large cohort of patients with histologically characterized NAFLD [53••]. Gellert-Kristensen et al. also evaluated inclusion of the GCKR variant, but found that it did not improve score performance [82].
Conclusion
Our knowledge of the aetiological drivers and pathophysiology of NAFLD has increased greatly in recent years. However, translating this to clinical practice remains a challenge. The majority of patients with NAFLD will not develop advanced liver disease. Therefore, identifying at-risk individuals to target for therapeutics and enhanced surveillance is critical. For this, the most accurate risk prediction scores will combine genetics with clinical variables and other biomarkers reflecting the underlying pathological mechanisms. However, accuracy will need to be weighed against cost, ease and acceptability for large-scale implementation.
In the near future, it is likely that artificial intelligence-based strategies to interrogate large multimodal datasets will uncover disease subtypes and enable the development of prognostic models. This will facilitate risk stratification of patients, optimisation of resources, and individualized treatment. This should, of course, be combined with wider, governmental strategies to address the root causes of the epidemic (e.g. societal and environmental factors promoting obesity) [4, 84].
Author Contributions
KPH and KM are corresponding authors for the manuscript. All authors contributed to the structure and drafting of the paper and provided critical review and editing for intellectual content.
Funding
Research in the KPH lab is supported by research grant funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Wellcome Trust (WT) as part of the Centre for Cell-Matrix Research. KM holds a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) clinical lectureship. KPH, VSA and KM receive funding from Innovate UK. KPH and VSA hold funding from Guts UK. EJ is funded by the MRC.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest from any of the authors.
Footnotes
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Genetics
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Katherine Martin, Email: katherine.martin@manchester.ac.uk.
Karen Piper Hanley, Email: karen.piperhanley@manchester.ac.uk.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
- 1.Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, Qiu Y, Burns L, Afendy A, Nader F. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019;71(4):793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Younossi ZM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - a global public health perspective. J Hepatol. 2019;70(3):531–544. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lazarus JV, Colombo M, Cortez-Pinto H, Huang TTK, Miller V, Ninburg M, Schattenberg JM, Seim L, Wong VWS, Zelber-Sagi S. NAFLD - sounding the alarm on a silent epidemic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(7):377–379. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0315-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Noureddin M, Vipani A, Bresee C, Todo T, Kim IK, Alkhouri N, Setiawan VW, Tran T, Ayoub WS, Lu SC, Klein AS, Sundaram V, Nissen NN. NASH leading cause of liver transplant in women: updated analysis of indications for liver transplant and ethnic and gender variances. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(11):1649–1659. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0088-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):123–133. doi: 10.1002/hep.29466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh, S., et al., Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015. 13(4): p. 643–54 e1–9; quiz e39–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Anstee QM, Reeves HL, Kotsiliti E, Govaere O, Heikenwalder M. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(7):411–428. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patel, Y.A., et al., Baseline Parameters in Clinical Trials for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Recommendations From the Liver Forum. Gastroenterology, 2017. 153(3): p. 621–625.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grundy SM, et al. Clinical management of metabolic syndrome: report of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Diabetes Association conference on scientific issues related to management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(2):e19–e24. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000112379.88385.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(5):1343–1351. doi: 10.1172/JCI23621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arner P, Langin D. Lipolysis in lipid turnover, cancer cachexia, and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2014;25(5):255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boden G, Shulman GI. Free fatty acids in obesity and type 2 diabetes: defining their role in the development of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. Eur J Clin Investig. 2002;32(Suppl 3):14–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.32.s3.3.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat Med. 2018;24(7):908–922. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yamaguchi K, Yang L, McCall S, Huang J, Yu XX, Pandey SK, Bhanot S, Monia BP, Li YX, Diehl AM. Inhibiting triglyceride synthesis improves hepatic steatosis but exacerbates liver damage and fibrosis in obese mice with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2007;45(6):1366–1374. doi: 10.1002/hep.21655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marra F, Svegliati-Baroni G. Lipotoxicity and the gut-liver axis in NASH pathogenesis. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):280–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Machado MV, Diehl AM. Pathogenesis of nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(8):1769–1777. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(6):1655–1669. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hytiroglou P, Theise ND. Regression of human cirrhosis: an update, 18 years after the pioneering article by Wanless et al. Virchows Arch. 2018;473(1):15–22. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2340-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, Ferrell LD, Liu YC, Torbenson MS, Unalp-Arida A, Yeh M, McCullough AJ, Sanyal AJ, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/hep.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol. 2015;62(5):1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reddy YK, Marella HK, Jiang Y, Ganguli S, Snell P, Podila PSB, Maliakkal B, Satapathy SK. Natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a study with paired liver biopsies. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020;10(3):245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Loomba R, Wong R, Fraysse J, Shreay S, Li S, Harrison S, Gordon SC. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression rates to cirrhosis and progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and mortality: a real world analysis of Medicare data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(11):1149–1159. doi: 10.1111/apt.15679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harris R, West J, Morling JR. Editorial: how widespread and serious is non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the real world? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(11):1199–1200. doi: 10.1111/apt.15714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(7):495–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pelusi S, Cespiati A, Rametta R, Pennisi G, Mannisto V, Rosso C, Baselli G, Dongiovanni P, Fracanzani AL, Badiali S, Maggioni M, Craxi A, Fargion S, Prati D, Nobili V, Bugianesi E, Romeo S, Pihlajamaki J, Petta S, Valenti L. Prevalence and risk factors of significant fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver without Steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(11):2310–2319. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive assessment of liver disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(5):1264–1281. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Newsome PN, Cramb R, Davison SM, Dillon JF, Foulerton M, Godfrey EM, Hall R, Harrower U, Hudson M, Langford A, Mackie A, Mitchell-Thain R, Sennett K, Sheron NC, Verne J, Walmsley M, Yeoman A. Guidelines on the management of abnormal liver blood tests. Gut. 2018;67(1):6–19. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liver, E.A.f.S.o. and A.L.p.e.E.d. Higado, EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol, 2015. 63(1): p. 237–264. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stål P, Kechagias S, Hultcrantz R. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1547–1554. doi: 10.1002/hep.27368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dulai PS, Singh S, Patel J, Soni M, Prokop LJ, Younossi Z, Sebastiani G, Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Stal P, Wong VWS, Kechagias S, Hultcrantz R, Loomba R. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017;65(5):1557–1565. doi: 10.1002/hep.29085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Mills PR, Keach JC, Lafferty HD, Stahler A, Haflidadottir S, Bendtsen F. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with Long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(2):389–397. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.http://www.uhs.nhs.uk/ClinicalResearchinSouthampton/Research/Facilities/NIHR-Southampton-Biomedical-Research-Centre/Ourresearchandimpacts/ Impactcasestudies/Tacklingsurgingalcoholicliverdisease.aspx [cited 2020 18th August].
- 35.Piscaglia F, Svegliati-Baroni G, Barchetti A, Pecorelli A, Marinelli S, Tiribelli C, Bellentani S, HCC-NAFLD Italian Study Group Clinical patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicenter prospective study. Hepatology. 2016;63(3):827–838. doi: 10.1002/hep.28368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.(EASL), E.A.f.t.S.o.t.L., E.A.f.t.S.o.D. (EASD), and E.A.f.t.S.o.O. (EASO), EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetologia, 2016. 59(6): p. 1121–40. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Grundy SM, Hobbs HH. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40(6):1387–1395. doi: 10.1002/hep.20466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Long MT, Gurary EB, Massaro JM, Ma J, Hoffmann U, Chung RT, Benjamin EJ, Loomba R. Parental non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in offspring. Liver Int. 2019;39(4):740–747. doi: 10.1111/liv.13956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Makkonen J, Pietiläinen KH, Rissanen A, Kaprio J, Yki-Järvinen H. Genetic factors contribute to variation in serum alanine aminotransferase activity independent of obesity and alcohol: a study in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. J Hepatol. 2009;50(5):1035–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Loomba R, Schork N, Chen CH, Bettencourt R, Bhatt A, Ang B, Nguyen P, Hernandez C, Richards L, Salotti J, Lin S, Seki E, Nelson KE, Sirlin CB, Brenner D, Genetics of NAFLD in Twins Consortium. Heritability of hepatic fibrosis and Steatosis based on a prospective twin study. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1784–1793. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.•• Romeo, S., et al., Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet, 2008. 40(12): p. 1461–5. Identification of the PNPLA3-I148M polymorphism and its association with hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Pirazzi C, Valenti L, Motta BM, Pingitore P, Hedfalk K, Mancina RM, Burza MA, Indiveri C, Ferro Y, Montalcini T, Maglio C, Dongiovanni P, Fargion S, Rametta R, Pujia A, Andersson L, Ghosal S, Levin M, Wiklund O, Iacovino M, Borén J, Romeo S. PNPLA3 has retinyl-palmitate lipase activity in human hepatic stellate cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(15):4077–4085. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.He S, McPhaul C, Li JZ, Garuti R, Kinch L, Grishin NV, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. A sequence variation (I148M) in PNPLA3 associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease disrupts triglyceride hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(9):6706–6715. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.064501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen W, Chang B, Li L, Chan L. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3/adiponutrin deficiency in mice is not associated with fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52(3):1134–1142. doi: 10.1002/hep.23812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.BasuRay S, Smagris E, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. The PNPLA3 variant associated with fatty liver disease (I148M) accumulates on lipid droplets by evading ubiquitylation. Hepatology. 2017;66(4):1111–1124. doi: 10.1002/hep.29273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Y, et al. PNPLA3, CGI-58, and inhibition of hepatic triglyceride hydrolysis in mice. Hepatology. 2019;69(6):2427–2441. doi: 10.1002/hep.30583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carlsson B, Lindén D, Brolén G, Liljeblad M, Bjursell M, Romeo S, Loomba R. Review article: the emerging role of genetics in precision medicine for patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(12):1305–1320. doi: 10.1111/apt.15738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Friedman SL. Hepatic stellate cells: protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiology Reviews. 2008;88:125–172. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bruschi FV, Claudel T, Tardelli M, Caligiuri A, Stulnig TM, Marra F, Trauner M. The PNPLA3 I148M variant modulates the fibrogenic phenotype of human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2017;65(6):1875–1890. doi: 10.1002/hep.29041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Walker RW, Belbin GM, Sorokin EP, van Vleck T, Wojcik GL, Moscati A, Gignoux CR, Cho J, Abul-Husn NS, Nadkarni G, Kenny EE, Loos RJF. A common variant in PNPLA3 is associated with age at diagnosis of NAFLD in patients from a multi-ethnic biobank. J Hepatol. 2020;72(6):1070–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rotman Y, Koh C, Zmuda JM, Kleiner DE, Liang TJ, the NASH CRN The association of genetic variability in patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) with histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52(3):894–903. doi: 10.1002/hep.23759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu YL, Patman GL, Leathart JBS, Piguet AC, Burt AD, Dufour JF, Day CP, Daly AK, Reeves HL, Anstee QM. Carriage of the PNPLA3 rs738409 C >G polymorphism confers an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;61(1):75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.•• Anstee, Q.M., et al., Genome-wide association study of non-alcoholic fatty liver and steatohepatitis in a histologically characterised cohort☆. J Hepatol, 2020. large GWAS including the full histologically characterised spectrum of NAFLD. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 54.Buch S, Stickel F, Trépo E, Way M, Herrmann A, Nischalke HD, Brosch M, Rosendahl J, Berg T, Ridinger M, Rietschel M, McQuillin A, Frank J, Kiefer F, Schreiber S, Lieb W, Soyka M, Semmo N, Aigner E, Datz C, Schmelz R, Brückner S, Zeissig S, Stephan AM, Wodarz N, Devière J, Clumeck N, Sarrazin C, Lammert F, Gustot T, Deltenre P, Völzke H, Lerch MM, Mayerle J, Eyer F, Schafmayer C, Cichon S, Nöthen MM, Nothnagel M, Ellinghaus D, Huse K, Franke A, Zopf S, Hellerbrand C, Moreno C, Franchimont D, Morgan MY, Hampe J. A genome-wide association study confirms PNPLA3 and identifies TM6SF2 and MBOAT7 as risk loci for alcohol-related cirrhosis. Nat Genet. 2015;47(12):1443–1448. doi: 10.1038/ng.3417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mederacke YS, Kirstein MM, Großhennig A, Marhenke S, Metzler F, Manns MP, Vogel A, Mederacke I. The PNPLA3 rs738409 GG genotype is associated with poorer prognosis in 239 patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(11):1160–1168. doi: 10.1111/apt.15722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stender S, Kozlitina J, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Hobbs HH, Cohen JC. Adiposity amplifies the genetic risk of fatty liver disease conferred by multiple loci. Nat Genet. 2017;49(6):842–847. doi: 10.1038/ng.3855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Donati B, Motta BM, Pingitore P, Meroni M, Pietrelli A, Alisi A, Petta S, Xing C, Dongiovanni P, del Menico B, Rametta R, Mancina RM, Badiali S, Fracanzani AL, Craxì A, Fargion S, Nobili V, Romeo S, Valenti L. The rs2294918 E434K variant modulates patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 expression and liver damage. Hepatology. 2016;63(3):787–798. doi: 10.1002/hep.28370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu YL, Reeves HL, Burt AD, Tiniakos D, McPherson S, Leathart JBS, Allison MED, Alexander GJ, Piguet AC, Anty R, Donaldson P, Aithal GP, Francque S, van Gaal L, Clement K, Ratziu V, Dufour JF, Day CP, Daly AK, Anstee QM. TM6SF2 rs58542926 influences hepatic fibrosis progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4309. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kozlitina J, Smagris E, Stender S, Nordestgaard BG, Zhou HH, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Vogt TF, Hobbs HH, Cohen JC. Exome-wide association study identifies a TM6SF2 variant that confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet. 2014;46(4):352–356. doi: 10.1038/ng.2901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dongiovanni P, Petta S, Maglio C, Fracanzani AL, Pipitone R, Mozzi E, Motta BM, Kaminska D, Rametta R, Grimaudo S, Pelusi S, Montalcini T, Alisi A, Maggioni M, Kärjä V, Borén J, Käkelä P, di Marco V, Xing C, Nobili V, Dallapiccola B, Craxi A, Pihlajamäki J, Fargion S, Sjöström L, Carlsson LM, Romeo S, Valenti L. Transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 gene variant disentangles nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from cardiovascular disease. Hepatology. 2015;61(2):506–514. doi: 10.1002/hep.27490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Smagris E, Gilyard S, BasuRay S, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Inactivation of Tm6sf2, a gene defective in fatty liver disease, impairs Lipidation but not secretion of very low density lipoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(20):10659–10676. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.719955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pirola CJ, Sookoian S. The dual and opposite role of the TM6SF2-rs58542926 variant in protecting against cardiovascular disease and conferring risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver: a meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2015;62(6):1742–1756. doi: 10.1002/hep.28142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mancina RM, Dongiovanni P, Petta S, Pingitore P, Meroni M, Rametta R, Borén J, Montalcini T, Pujia A, Wiklund O, Hindy G, Spagnuolo R, Motta BM, Pipitone RM, Craxì A, Fargion S, Nobili V, Käkelä P, Kärjä V, Männistö V, Pihlajamäki J, Reilly DF, Castro-Perez J, Kozlitina J, Valenti L, Romeo S. The MBOAT7-TMC4 variant rs641738 increases risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in individuals of European descent. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(5):1219–1230. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Donati B, Dongiovanni P, Romeo S, Meroni M, McCain M, Miele L, Petta S, Maier S, Rosso C, de Luca L, Vanni E, Grimaudo S, Romagnoli R, Colli F, Ferri F, Mancina RM, Iruzubieta P, Craxi A, Fracanzani AL, Grieco A, Corradini SG, Aghemo A, Colombo M, Soardo G, Bugianesi E, Reeves H, Anstee QM, Fargion S, Valenti L. MBOAT7 rs641738 variant and hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic individuals. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04991-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sookoian S, Flichman D, Garaycoechea ME, Gazzi C, Martino JS, Castaño GO, Pirola CJ. Lack of evidence supporting a role of TMC4-rs641738 missense variant-MBOAT7- intergenic downstream variant-in the susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5097. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23453-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lee HC, Inoue T, Imae R, Kono N, Shirae S, Matsuda S, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Arai H. Caenorhabditis elegans mboa-7, a member of the MBOAT family, is required for selective incorporation of polyunsaturated fatty acids into phosphatidylinositol. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(3):1174–1184. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tanaka Y, et al. LPIAT1/MBOAT7 depletion increases triglyceride synthesis fueled by high phosphatidylinositol turnover. Gut. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Thangapandi VR, Knittelfelder O, Brosch M, Patsenker E, Vvedenskaya O, Buch S, et al. Loss of hepatic Mboat7 leads to liver fibrosis. Gut. 2020:gutjnl-2020-320853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Slosberg ED, Desai UJ, Fanelli B, St. Denny I, Connelly S, Kaleko M, Boettcher BR, Caplan SL. Treatment of type 2 diabetes by adenoviral-mediated overexpression of the glucokinase regulatory protein. Diabetes. 2001;50(8):1813–1820. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Raimondo A, Rees MG, Gloyn AL. Glucokinase regulatory protein: complexity at the crossroads of triglyceride and glucose metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015;26(2):88–95. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Santoro N, Zhang CK, Zhao H, Pakstis AJ, Kim G, Kursawe R, Dykas DJ, Bale AE, Giannini C, Pierpont B, Shaw MM, Groop L, Caprio S. Variant in the glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR) gene is associated with fatty liver in obese children and adolescents. Hepatology. 2012;55(3):781–789. doi: 10.1002/hep.24806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vaxillaire M, Cavalcanti-Proenca C, Dechaume A, Tichet J, Marre M, Balkau B, Froguel P, for the DESIR Study Group The common P446L polymorphism in GCKR inversely modulates fasting glucose and triglyceride levels and reduces type 2 diabetes risk in the DESIR prospective general French population. Diabetes. 2008;57(8):2253–2257. doi: 10.2337/db07-1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Petta S, Miele L, Bugianesi E, Cammà C, Rosso C, Boccia S, Cabibi D, di Marco V, Grimaudo S, Grieco A, Pipitone RM, Marchesini G, Craxì A. Glucokinase regulatory protein gene polymorphism affects liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Speliotes EK, Yerges-Armstrong LM, Wu J, Hernaez R, Kim LJ, Palmer CD, Gudnason V, Eiriksdottir G, Garcia ME, Launer LJ, Nalls MA, Clark JM, Mitchell BD, Shuldiner AR, Butler JL, Tomas M, Hoffmann U, Hwang SJ, Massaro JM, O'Donnell CJ, Sahani DV, Salomaa V, Schadt EE, Schwartz SM, Siscovick DS, NASH CRN. GIANT Consortium. MAGIC Investigators. Voight BF, Carr JJ, Feitosa MF, Harris TB, Fox CS, Smith AV, Kao WHL, Hirschhorn JN, Borecki IB, GOLD Consortium Genome-wide association analysis identifies variants associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease that have distinct effects on metabolic traits. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(3):e1001324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zain SM, Mohamed Z, Mohamed R. Common variant in the glucokinase regulatory gene rs780094 and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(1):21–27. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fernandes Silva L, Vangipurapu J, Kuulasmaa T, Laakso M. An intronic variant in the GCKR gene is associated with multiple lipids. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46750-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ling Y, Li X, Gu Q, Chen H, Lu D, Gao X. Associations of common polymorphisms in GCKR with type 2 diabetes and related traits in a Han Chinese population: a case-control study. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Horiguchi Y, Araki M, Motojima K. 17beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 13 is a liver-specific lipid droplet-associated protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;370(2):235–238. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Su W, Wang Y, Jia X, Wu W, Li L, Tian X, Li S, Wang C, Xu H, Cao J, Han Q, Xu S, Chen Y, Zhong Y, Zhang X, Liu P, Gustafsson JA, Guan Y. Comparative proteomic study reveals 17β-HSD13 as a pathogenic protein in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(31):11437–11442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410741111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ma Y, Belyaeva OV, Brown PM, Fujita K, Valles K, Karki S, de Boer YS, Koh C, Chen Y, du X, Handelman SK, Chen V, Speliotes EK, Nestlerode C, Thomas E, Kleiner DE, Zmuda JM, Sanyal AJ, (for the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network) Kedishvili NY, Liang TJ, Rotman Y. 17-Beta Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 13 is a hepatic retinol dehydrogenase associated with histological features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2019;69(4):1504–1519. doi: 10.1002/hep.30350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Abul-Husn NS, Cheng X, Li AH, Xin Y, Schurmann C, Stevis P, Liu Y, Kozlitina J, Stender S, Wood GC, Stepanchick AN, Still MD, McCarthy S, O’Dushlaine C, Packer JS, Balasubramanian S, Gosalia N, Esopi D, Kim SY, Mukherjee S, Lopez AE, Fuller ED, Penn J, Chu X, Luo JZ, Mirshahi UL, Carey DJ, Still CD, Feldman MD, Small A, Damrauer SM, Rader DJ, Zambrowicz B, Olson W, Murphy AJ, Borecki IB, Shuldiner AR, Reid JG, Overton JD, Yancopoulos GD, Hobbs HH, Cohen JC, Gottesman O, Teslovich TM, Baras A, Mirshahi T, Gromada J, Dewey FE. A protein-truncating HSD17B13 variant and protection from chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1096–1106. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gellert-Kristensen H, Richardson TG, Davey Smith G, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Stender S. Combined effect of PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and HSD17B13 variants on risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in the general population. Hepatology. 2020;72:845–856. doi: 10.1002/hep.31238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pfeiffer RM, Rotman Y, O'Brien TR. Genetic determinants of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma due to fatty liver disease: What's the score? Hepatology. 2020;72:794–796. doi: 10.1002/hep.31413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Williams R, Aithal G, Alexander GJ, Allison M, Armstrong I, Aspinall R, Baker A, Batterham R, Brown K, Burton R, Cramp ME, Day N, Dhawan A, Drummond C, Ferguson J, Foster G, Gilmore I, Greenberg J, Henn C, Jarvis H, Kelly D, Mathews M, McCloud A, MacGilchrist A, McKee M, Moriarty K, Morling J, Newsome P, Rice P, Roberts S, Rutter H, Samyn M, Severi K, Sheron N, Thorburn D, Verne J, Vohra J, Williams J, Yeoman A. Unacceptable failures: the final report of the lancet commission into liver disease in the UK. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):226–239. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32908-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]