Abstract
Biallelic pathogenic variants in solute carrier family 38 member 8, SLC38A8, cause a pan-ocular autosomal recessive condition known as foveal hypoplasia 2, FVH2, characterised by foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus and optic nerve chiasmal misrouting. Patients are often clinically diagnosed with ocular albinism, but foveal hypoplasia can occur in several other ocular disorders. Here we describe nine patients from seven families who had molecularly confirmed biallelic recessive variants in SLC38A8 identified through whole genome sequencing or targeted gene panel testing. We identified four novel sequence variants (p.(Tyr88*), p.(Trp145*), p.(Glu233Gly) and c.632+1G>A). All patients presented with foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus and reduced visual acuity; however, one patient did not exhibit any signs of chiasmal misrouting, and three patients had features of anterior segment dysgenesis. We highlight these findings in the context of 30 other families reported to date. This study reinforces the importance of obtaining a molecular diagnosis in patients whose phenotype overlap with other inherited ocular conditions, in order to support genetic counselling, clinical prognosis and family planning. We expand the spectrum of SLC38A8 mutations which will be relevant for treatment through future genetic-based therapies.
Keywords: foveal hypoplasia, SLC38A8, nystagmus, chiasmal misrouting, anterior segment dysgenesis
1. Introduction
The human fovea is located at the most central part of the macula, a 1.5 mm wide area most densely packed with cone photoreceptors. Its anatomy is distinct from other retinal regions, having a single layer of cones in the neurosensory retina with the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layer displaced radially outwards forming the foveal pit. Foveal hypoplasia (FVH) is the absence of this normal foveal depression, and the resultant continuation of all retinal layers and retinal vasculature through the foveal region. Grading systems describe the extent of FVH [1,2], and this can occur in isolation or as a feature of several ocular disorders including albinism, aniridia, retinopathy of prematurity, and microphthalmia. More recent associations, identified through high-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, are achromatopsia, optic nerve hypoplasia, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy and Stickler syndrome [3]. For most—but not all—of these conditions, FVH is accompanied by nystagmus and decreased visual acuity, but this is dependent on the grade and severity.
When FVH occurs with optic nerve misrouting, it is usually an indication of albinism. Recessive mutations in the SLC38A8 (solute carrier family 38 member 8) gene on chromosome 16q23.3 have been shown, however, to cause FVH and optic nerve misrouting independent of the pigmentation defects associated with oculocutaneous albinism or ocular albinism [4,5]. Additionally known as foveal hypoplasia 2 with or without optic nerve misrouting and/or anterior segment dysgenesis (FVH2, OMIM #609218), SLC38A8 is a pan-ocular autosomal recessive condition, additionally labelled with the acronym FHONDA (foveal hypoplasia, optic nerve decussation and anterior segment dysgenesis without albinism) [6].
SLC38A8 has 10 exons and encodes an amino acid transporter protein, which is one of 11 members of the SLC38 sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter (SNAT) family. The 435-amino acid protein SNAT8, has eleven transmembrane domains, an extracellular N-terminus and an intracellular C-terminal tail. The functional characterisation of SNAT8 showed that it is ubiquitously expressed in neurons and has a broad substrate profile with high preference for transporting l-glutamine, l-alanine, l-arginine, l-histidine and l-aspartate. As a glutamine transporter, a key role for regulating levels of glutamate and gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain has been suggested [7]. GABA/GABAergic dysregulation has a significant impact on brain function from developmental to neurodegenerative changes as seen in Alzheimer’s disease. It remains unknown whether this disruption in early development impacts on axonal projection, hence contributing towards chiasmal misrouting. Using human eye tissues, SLC38A8 was shown to be located throughout the neural retina, specifically in the inner and outer plexiform layers and the photoreceptor layer [4].
To date, 33 unique disease-causing mutations have been reported in 30 families of multiple ethnicities (Summarised in Table S1) [4,5,8,9,10,11,12], with an additional four only reported in ClinVar (total = 37). Almost half (n = 16) are missense mutations with the remainder being frameshift (n = 6), nonsense (n = 4), splice variant (n = 4) and deletion mutations (n = 7). In this study we detail the clinical and molecular findings in seven families with biallelic SLC38A8 mutations causing foveal hypoplasia, identified through whole genome sequencing (WGS), and through targeted gene panel testing, thus expanding the phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of SLC38A8-oculopathy.
2. Results
2.1. Molecular Variant Findings
Nine patients (6 females and 3 males) from 7 families with FVH and nystagmus were recruited into this study. Four families were of South Asian ethnicity with reported consanguinity, and three were Caucasian and non-consanguineous. The pedigrees of each family are shown in Figure 1 and the molecular findings summarised in Table 1. We identified 4 novel variants in SLC38A8 accounting for families 1–5; two nonsense (c.264C>G p.[Tyr88*] and c.435G>A p.[Trp145*]), one missense (c.698A>G, p.[Glu233Gly]) and one splice site (c.632+1G>A). A known missense heterozygous variant was found in family 6 (c.923C>G, p.[Thr308Ser]) together with a heterozygous deletion of exons 7 and 8 and a known homozygous missense was found in family 7 (c.848A>C, p.[Asp283Ala]). There are 37 reported mutations to date, and along with our novel variants these span all 10 exons (Figure 2A). The genotype of families 1, 3, 4 and 5 were reported in our previous study reporting the genetic outcomes of a large cohort of non-retinal developmental eye disease patients recruited into the 100,000 Genomes Project, but no detailed phenotype data was provided [13]. Variants were shown to be in trans in five of seven families where parents, all unaffected, were available for segregation analysis. Probands from families three and four were analysed as singletons.
Table 1.
Family ID | Ethnicity | Consanguinity | Variants | Exon | Consequence | Protein Domain | Zygosity | Reported | gnomAD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (26320) | South Asian Bangladesh |
Yes | c.264C>G p.(Tyr88*) | 2 | Nonsense | Intracellular between TM domains 1 and 2 | HOM | Novel | 0.0002614 in South Asians only |
2 (23089) | South Asian Indian |
Yes | c.264C>G p.(Tyr88*) | 2 | Nonsense | Intracellular between TM domains 1 and 2 | HOM | Novel | 0.0002614 in South Asians only |
3 (26350) | South Asian Pakistan |
Yes | c.264C>G p.(Tyr88*) | 2 | Nonsense | Intracellular between TM domains 1 and 2 | HOM | Novel | 0.0002614 in South Asians only |
4 (26364) | South Asian Sri-Lanka |
Yes | c.698A>G p.Glu233Gly | 6 | Missense | TM6 | HOM | Novel | Absent |
5 (26237) | Caucasian British |
No | c.435G>A p.Trp145* | 3 | Nonsense | Extracellular between TM domains 3 and 4 | HET | Novel | Absent |
c.632+1G>A | IVS4 | Splice donor | Extracellular between TM domains 5 and 6 | HET | Novel | Absent | |||
6 (16812) | Caucasian Spanish-British |
No | c.923C>G p.Thr308Ser Del Ex7-8 |
7 | Missense splice site impact Deletion |
TM8 TM7-TM10 |
HET HET |
[9] [9] |
Absent Absent |
7 (28327) | Caucasian Ashkenazi Jewish |
No | c.848A>C p.(Asp283Ala) | 7 | Missense | Extracellular between TM domains 7 and 8 | HOM | [8,9] | 0.0002653 in gnomAD 0.006178 in AJs |
The nonsense mutation c.264C>G, p.(Tyr88*), observed homozygously in families 1, 2 and 3, lies between transmembrane domains 2–3, in a region deplete of reported variants (Figure 2A). It is likely that transcripts encoding nonsense and frameshift variants will be removed by nonsense-mediated decay or alternatively result in a truncated protein. In family 5, the novel nonsense mutation c.435G>A, p.(Trp145*) lies between transmembrane domains 3-4, in proximity to another nonsense mutation, p.(Gln149Ter), listed in ClinVar (rs14689932). This may be a region susceptible to protein function disruption. The novel splice variant c.632+1G>A observed in trans with p.(Trp145*) in family 5 alters the conserved canonical donor splice site at the exon4-intron4 junction, and a different splice mutation at this site, c.632+2T>G, was recently described [12]. The novel missense c.698A>G, p.(Glu233Gly) in family 4 is predicted to be probably damaging/damaging/disease-causing by Polyphen2, SIFT and Mutation Taster, respectively. It involves a highly conserved residue within a conserved block (Figure 2B) and is absent from gnomAD. It occurs in the sixth transmembrane domain which harbours 5 other missense variants and is the most frequently affected domain. The previously reported [9] missense c.923C>G, p.(Thr308Ser) heterozygous variant in family 6 is similarly predicted to be likely pathogenic and is also positioned in a highly conserved amino acid residue block (Figure 2B). It is also absent from gnomAD, though a different amino acid missense at this position, p.(Thr308Ala), has also been reported [9]. It is the only mutated amino acid in the eighth transmembrane domain. It is therefore likely that these missense mutations occur in locations that are critical for the normal function of the protein. A deletion spanning exons 7 and 8 was found in trans with c.923C>G, p.(Thr308Ser) in family 6. An exon 7-8 deletion has also been described in one patient of French origin in trans with c.697G>A, p.(Glu233Lys) (see Table S1).
The homozygous missense variant c.848A>C, p.(Asp283Ala) found in family 7 has previously been reported in both a homozygous [8,14] and compound heterozygous state with the pathogenic variant c.527C>G, p.(Thr176Arg) [9]. It occurs in the extracellular domain between the 7th and 8th transmembrane domains and structural modelling predicted a destabilizing effect on the protein by altering the electrostatic potential within the channel pore [8]. Family 7 were of Ashkenazi Jewish descent and this variant is relatively common in this population (0.006178 compared to 0.0002653 in gnomAD overall).
2.2. Clinical Findings
The ophthalmic and ocular findings of patients with SLC38A8 variants are summarised in Table 2 and Figure 1. The mean ± SD BCVA was 0.73 ± 0.15 LogMAR. All nine patients had FVH and eight out of nine patients demonstrated a horizontal nystagmus waveform type (7 with pendular nystagmus and 1 had a jerk with extended foveation), and one patient had a rotary nystagmus. FVH was recorded through either ophthalmic examination or retinal imaging using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) or SD-OCT. FAF revealed an absence of the foveal hypoautofluorescent spot, hence no defined fovea as shown in Figure 1D and J. SD-OCT was challenging due to lack of patient fixation resulting from the FVH and nystagmus, however using the best single line scans, grade 4 FVH was seen in six families, graded according to Thomas et al. [8] Grade 4 FVH includes absence of the following features: (i) plexiform layers, (ii) foveal pit, (iii) outer segment lengthening and (iv) outer nuclear layer widening (Figure 1D,F,H,J). Close inspection of the UWF colour fundus images revealed the concentric macular ring sign in four patients; 1-1, 2-1, 4-1 (shown in Figure 1F) and 6-1. Its appearance is reliant on the quality of the images, which as with OCT is confounded by age and fixation. This is a documented sign of FVH which has been postulated to arise from the radially symmetric orientation of the axon photoreceptors (Henle fibre layer) and possibly also the retinal nerve fibre layer surrounding the fovea [15,16].
Table 2.
Family ID/Patient | Ethnicity | Age (Years) |
Gender | BCVA OD | BCVA OS | Refraction | Strabismus | Nystagmus | Anterior Segment | Foveal Hypoplasia | Electrodiagnostic Testing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-1 | South Asian Bangladesh |
3 | Male | Objects to occlusion | Objects to occlusion | R: +3.50/−2.50 × 180 L: +3.50/−3.50 × 180 |
Left Exotropia | Pendular horizontal | Normal | Present | No evidence of chiasmal misrouting |
2-1 | South Asian Indian |
32 | Female | 0.6 | 0.6 | R: −1.75/−3.50 × 180 L: −7.00/−2.50 × 170 |
Left Esotropia | Pendular horizontal | Normal | Grade 4 | Evidence of chiasmal misrouting |
2-2 | 16 | Male | 0.82 | 0.78 | R: −0.75/−3.50 × 10 L: +1.50/−4.00 × 175 |
Right Exotropia | Pendular horizontal | Posterior embryotoxon | Grade 4 | Evidence of chiasmal misrouting | |
3-1 | South Asian Pakistan |
21 | Female | 0.7 | 0.9 | R: +0.75/−2.50 × 30 L: +0.75/−2.50 × 75 |
Left Exotropia | Pendular horizontal | Normal | Present | Not undertaken |
4-1 | South Asian Sri-Lanka |
39 | Female | 0.6 | 0.6 | Not available | Left Exotropia | Pendular horizontal | Bilateral Posterior embryotoxon Bilateral peripheral iris adhesions to the cornea Bilateral blue dot cataract |
Grade 4 | Evidence of chiasmal misrouting |
5-1 | Caucasian British |
5 | Female | 0.6 | 0.6 | R: +3.50DS L: +3.50DS |
No deviation | Jerk with extended foveation | Normal | Grade 4 | Evidence of chiasmal misrouting |
5-2 | 2 | Male | Objects to occlusion | Objects to occlusion | R: +5.00/−0.75 × 180 L: +5.00/−0.75 × 180 |
No deviation | Pendular horizontal | Normal | Present | Not undertaken | |
6-1 | Caucasian Spanish-British |
36 | Female | 0.9 | 1 | Not available | Left Esotropia | Rotary | Bilateral shallow anterior chamber | Grade 4 | Evidence of chiasmal misrouting |
7-1 | Caucasian Ashkenazi Jewish |
16 | Female | 0.42 | 0.4 | R: +2.50/−1.50 × 165 L: +1.50/−1.50 × 180 |
Right Exotropia | Pendular horizontal | Peripheral iris transillumination | Grade 4 | Evidence of chiasmal misrouting |
Seven patients had a strabismus with exotropia in five patients and esotropia in two. Six patients who underwent electrophysiology with pattern appearance visual evoked potentials (VEP) had evidence of intracranial misrouting with contralateral predominance (crossed asymmetry). Three patients (2-2, 4-1 and 6-1) had variable degrees of anterior segment dysgenesis, two had bilateral posterior embryotoxon, 4-1 also had bilateral iris adhesions to the cornea and bilateral blue dot cataracts, and 6-1 had bilateral shallow anterior chamber.
In family 2, of Indian Gujarati background, both the affected siblings were initially reported as having paler skin than their three unaffected siblings and parents, however, over time their skin pigmentation was similar to that of the rest of the family. Their hair and eyes were no different to that of their parents. In family 5, of Caucasian ethnicity, it was noted that the two affected children had fair hair and complexion, but this was in common with both their parents and many fair-haired and blue-eyed relatives. The remaining patients had normal hair and skin pigment compared to relatives and no ocular hypopigmentation.
All previously documented cases in the literature (30 families) were analysed for the prevalence of SLC38A8 phenotypic features including our cohort (seven families). Of the 58 affected individuals in 37 families, 100% (n = 58) had foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus, while 97% (29 out of the 30 who underwent VEP testing) showed chiasmal misrouting. Anterior segment dysgenesis was documented in 22% (13/58) of patients with 21% (n = 12) having posterior embryotoxon and 5% (n = 3) showing Axenfeld anomaly (defined as posterior embryotoxon with peripheral anterior iris adhesions). Strabismus was observed in 54% (20/37) and iris transillumination in 7% (4/58) (see Figure 3 and Table S2).
3. Discussion
This study reports four novel variants in SLC38A8 amongst 7 families, with the associated clinical features, and compares these to previously described molecularly confirmed cases. The homozygous nonsense mutation c.264C>G, p.(Tyr88*) was found in three unrelated families from different regions of South Asia. This variant was rare in gnomAD, but found with an allele frequency of 0.0002614 only in the South Asian population suggesting that this represents a possible founder mutation.
Foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus were present in all patients, with 83.3% (5/6 patients) showing evidence of intracranial misrouting. Prior to 2013, visual pathway developmental defects of foveal hypoplasia and intracranial misrouting were considered pathognomonic of albinism, and the associated defects in the melanin-biosynthesis pathway [4,6]. It has since been suggested that SLC38A8-related features occur in a melanin-independent manner with no effect on pigmentation. In our cohort two families were described as having paler skin (Family 2 and 5) and fair hair (Family 5), hence were clinically diagnosed with oculocutaneous/ocular albinism prior to genetic testing. Over time, the affected individuals in both families reached similar levels of pigmentation to their parents and siblings. In all the other reported families in the literature, there were no signs of cutaneous hypopigmentation. In addition, more variability in grade of foveal hypoplasia is seen in patients with albinism and PAX6 variants compared to SLC38A8 patients, who have a more severe retinal phenotype indicating an earlier arrest in foveal development [12].
Anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD) encompasses a spectrum of clinical features originating from maldevelopment of the anterior segment, which can involve all or any part of the cornea, anterior chamber, trabecular meshwork, iris, ciliary body, and lens. Our cohort, together with published cases report ASD features ranging from posterior embryotoxon alone to Axenfeld anomaly, blue-dot cataract and shallow anterior chambers. The prevalence of posterior embryotoxon in the younger (≤20 years of age) population has been reported to be 22.5% [17]. Analysis of all SLC38A8 reported cases reveals a similar prevalence of 22% (13/58), but in our cohort alone, this increases to 33% (3/9). The SLC38A8 variants in all patients with ASD were not localised to the same region/domain, so there was no genotype-phenotype correlation. Hence, it remains unclear if this is a variable feature of the disorder or a coincidental finding. Human gene expression datasets show that SLC38A8 transcript (ENST00000299709.7) is differentially expressed across the eye including the foetal retina (7.75 log2(TPM + 1)), foetal RPE (5.56 log2(TPM + 1)), cornea endothelium (1.03 log2(TPM + 1)) and stem cell derived lens (2.92 log2(TPM + 1)) [18]. This pan-ocular expression is similar to PAX6, which also plays a significant role in foveal and anterior segment development; hence, further deeper phenotyping may be required with the use of anterior segment OCT to carefully capture the morphology of these affected eyes.
Isolated foveal hypoplasia without optic nerve misrouting or anterior segment dysgenesis was found in one family (family 1). Differential diagnoses includes autosomal dominant foveal hypoplasia-1 (FVH1, OMIM #136520), also referred to as foveal hypoplasia-1 with or without anterior segment anomalies and/or cataract, which is caused by heterozygous missense variants in the PAX6 gene on chromosome 11p13 [19,20]. Hemizygous mutations in GPR143 on chromosome Xp22, commonly cause ocular albinism type I (OMIM 300500); however, in a smaller number of cases, it has been reported to cause isolated congenital nystagmus-6 (OMIM 300814). In a six-generation Chinese family with a c.266C>T, p.(Ser89Phe) variant, affected members displayed nystagmus and foveal hypoplasia, without any typical signs of ocular albinism such as iris transillumination defects, fundus hypopigmentation and intracranial misrouting [21]. In a Korean family with a GPR143 c.623C>A, p.(Ala208Glu) variant, one affected male displayed typical ocular albinism signs with severe hypopigmentation with clearly visible choroid vessels in the entire retina and eye movement recording showed a horizontal, conjugate pendular nystagmus. His affected sibling had isolated foveal hypoplasia with no nystagmus nor iris or fundus hypopigmentation [22]. Electrophysiology was not reported in this study. Care should be taken as iris and fundus hypopigmentation may not always be apparent in Asians.
All but one of the patients in this study were solved through whole genome sequencing facilitated by the 100,000 Genomes Project, highlighting its utility to determine a molecular diagnosis, especially where the phenotypic overlap with albinism, aniridia and other ocular conditions can lead to potential misdiagnosis. Recognising the phenotype of SLC38A8-oculopathy (and pattern of inheritance) will enable the clinical genetics team to apply supporting evidence for pathogenicity (PP4) when required to confirm a molecular diagnosis of a SLC38A8 variant of uncertain significance [23]. In addition, reaching an accurate diagnosis is especially important for informed genetic counselling and family planning advice, given the different inheritance patterns related to the other disease phenocopies. There are emerging gene-based applications for treating albinism [24] such as adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based Oa1 gene therapy which has been demonstrated in knockout mice models for ocular albinism [25] and with Tyr oculocutaneous albinism type 1 [26]. Successful CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of Tyr has also been demonstrated for albinism in rabbits [27]. These pigment targeted gene-based therapies will be relevant for future therapies of patients with albinism, for example, through the restoration of tyrosinase production, and will depend on accurate genetic diagnosis.
SLC38A8-oculopathy may well be under diagnosed because of its subtle presentation, easily confused with albinism. Current molecular diagnostic rates for albinism and nystagmus using WGS are approximately 28% [13]. Until recently, SLC38A8 was not included in the albinism and nystagmus targeted gene panels. As found with patients presenting with nystagmus [28], more comprehensive gene panels offered as an initial assessment will limit such diagnostic delays. Detailed phenotyping of patients will also help to characterise the pan-ocular features associated with this condition.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Patients and Genetic Analysis
All patients attended the ocular genetics service at MEH. Patients and relatives gave written informed consent for participation in this study through either the Genetic Study of Inherited Eye Disease (REC reference 12/LO/0141) or Genomics England 100,000 Genomes project (REC reference 14/EE/1112). Families 1-6 comprising of probands and one or two unaffected parents where available) had undergone WGS analysis through participation in the 100,000 Genomes Project [29]. Detailed by Taylor et al. [30], genomic DNA was processed using an Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq X Ten high-throughput sequencing platform, generating minimum coverage of 15 X for >97% of the callable autosomal genome. Readings were aligned to either build GRCh37 or GRCH38 of the human genome using an Isaac aligner (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels (insertions or deletions) were identified using Platypus soft-ware (version 0.8.1; and annotated using Cellbase software (https://github.com/opencb/cellbase). Variant filtering was performed using minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.001 in publicly available and in-house data sets, predicted protein effect, and familial segregation. Surviving variants were prioritized using the Retinal disorders version 2.120 (https://panelapp.genomicsengland.co.uk/panels/307/) and the Albinism or congenital nystagmus version 1.10 (https://panelapp.genomicsengland.co.uk/panels/511/) virtual gene panels.
The proband from family 7 underwent targeted albinism and nystagmus gene panel testing through the Rare & Inherited Disease Genomic Laboratory at Great Ormond Street Hospital (London, UK). Mutation screening was carried out by next generation sequencing with library preparation using the Agilent focused clinical exome +1 kit followed by sequencing on the Illumina platforms. Data were analysed using an in-house pipeline and virtual gene panels including SLC38A8, with all mutations confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
Likely pathogenicity of the novel missense variant was assessed using the predictive algorithms PolyPhen-2 [31], SIFT [32] and Mutation Taster [33].The genetic results were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team (including molecular biologists, clinical geneticists, as well as the ophthalmology specialist managing the family), to confirm variant pathogenicity, prevalence in publicly available genome databases, the clinical phenotype and mode of inheritance, before the molecular diagnosis was established. The datasets (variants) generated for this study were submitted to ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/). We describe nine patients from seven unrelated families who were clinically diagnosed with bilateral foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus, and molecularly confirmed biallelic mutations in SLC38A8.
4.2. Clinical Assessment
Ophthalmic examination included full orthoptic assessment, refraction, best corrected visual acuity (VA) measured using LogMAR or Cardiff cards for preverbal children up to 36 months of age; slit lamp examination, and fundus examination were recorded with anterior segment and ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus colour imaging using the Haag-Streit slit lamp camera (Haag-Streit Holdings AG, Köniz, Switzerland) and Optos® California (Optos plc), respectively. Investigations included spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence, eye movement recordings (EMR) to assess nystagmus waveforms, electrophysiology to detect chiasmal misrouting of retinal ganglion cells through visual evoked potentials (VEP) against ISCEV standards, and either multichannel flash VEP alone (for younger paediatric patients) or a combination of both flash and pattern VEP. Due to the nystagmus and foveal hypoplasia seen in all patients, retinal imaging was challenging due to fixation difficulties and compliance in young children. Multiple line scan SD-OCT was attempted, but reverted to multiple single line scans where not possible to capture the foveal pit.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to patients and relatives for taking part in this research. This research was made possible through access to the data and findings generated by the 100,000 Genomes Project; http://www.genomicsengland.co.uk.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/3/1130/s1, Table S1: Published variants in SLC38A8, Table S2: Percentage of phenotypic features seen in previously documented cases.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M. and E.R.S.; clinical data, M.M., A.R.W., V.K.T., H.W.C. and M.T.; analysis and interpretation, M.M., E.R.S., V.K.T. and A.R.W.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R.S., V.K.T.; writing—review and editing, M.M., A.R.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The research was supported by the Wellcome Trust (Grant No. 205174/Z/16/Z). We gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology. The views expressed are those of the authors and not the funding organisations.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study had relevant local and national research ethics committee approvals (Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [MEH] and the Northwest London Research Ethics Committee), and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients and relatives gave written informed consent for genetic testing through either the Genetic Study of Inherited Eye Disease (REC reference 12/LO/0141) or Genomics England 100,000 Genomes project (REC reference 14/EE/1112).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The variants reported in this paper have been deposited into the ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information under accession numbers RCV001270481, SCV001450776, SCV001450777 and SCV001450778.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Thomas M.G., Kumar A., Mohammad S., Proudlock F.A., Engle E.C., Andrews C., Chan W.M., Thomas S., Gottlob I. Structural grading of foveal hypoplasia using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: A predictor of visual acuity? Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1653–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rufai S.R., Thomas M.G., Purohit R., Bunce C., Lee H., Proudlock F.A., Gottlob I. Can structural grading of foveal hypoplasia predict future vision in infantile nystagmus? A longitudinal study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kondo H. Foveal hypoplasia and optical coherence tomographic imaging. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2017;8:181–188. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_101_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Poulter J.A., Al-Araimi M., Conte I., Van Genderen M.M., Sheridan E., Carr I.M., Parry D.A., Shires M., Carrella S., Bradbury J., et al. Recessive mutations in SLC38A8 cause foveal hypoplasia and optic nerve misrouting without albinism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013;93:1143–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Perez Y., Gradstein L., Flusser H., Markus B., Cohen I., Langer Y., Marcus M., Lifshitz T., Kadir R., Birk O.S. Isolated foveal hypoplasia with secondary nystagmus and low vision is associated with a homozygous SLC38A8 mutation. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013;22:703–706. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Al-Araimi M., Pal B., Poulter J.A., Van Genderen M.M., Carr I., Cudrnak T., Brown L., Sheridan E., Mohamed M.D., Bradbury J., et al. A new recessively inherited disorder composed of foveal hypoplasia, optic nerve decussation defects and anterior segment dysgenesis maps to chromosome 16q23.3-24.1. Mol. Vis. 2013;19:2165–2172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hägglund M.G., Hellsten S.V., Bagchi S., Philippot G., Löfqvist E., Nilsson V.C., Almkvist I., Karlsson E., Sreedharan S., Tafreshiha A., et al. Transport of l-Glutamine, l-Alanine, l-Arginine and l-Histidine by the Neuron-Specific Slc38a8 (SNAT8) in CNS. J. Mol. Biol. 2015;427:1495–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Toral M.A., Velez G., Boudreault K., Schaefer K.A., Xu Y., Saffra N., Bassuk A.G., Tsang S.H., Mahajan V.B. Structural modeling of a novel SLC38A8 mutation that causes foveal hypoplasia. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2017;5:202–209. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lasseaux E., Plaisant C., Michaud V., Pennamen P., Trimouille A., Gaston L., Monfermé S., Lacombe D., Rooryck C., Morice-Picard F., et al. Molecular characterization of a series of 990 index patients with albinism. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2018;31:466–474. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Campbell P., Ellingford J.M., Parry N.R.A., Fletcher T., Ramsden S.C., Gale T., Hall G., Smith K., Kasperaviciute D., Thomas E., et al. Clinical and genetic variability in children with partial albinism. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:16576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51768-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weiner C., Hecht I., Rotenstreich Y., Guttman S., Or L., Morad Y., Shapira G., Shomron N., Pras E. The pathogenicity of SLC38A8 in five families with foveal hypoplasia and congenital nystagmus. Exp. Eye Res. 2020;193:107958. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.107958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kuht H.J., Han J., Maconachie G.D., Park S.E., Lee S.T., McLean R., Sheth V., Hisaund M., Dawar B., Sylvius N., et al. SLC38A8 mutations result in arrested retinal development with loss of cone photoreceptor specialisation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020;29:2989–3002. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddaa166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jackson D., Malka S., Harding P., Palma J., Dunbar H., Moosajee M. Molecular diagnostic challenges for non-retinal developmental eye disorders in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part C Semin. Med. Genet. 2020;184:578–589. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lord E.C., Poulter J.A., Webster A.R., Sergouniotis P., Khan K.N., Benke P.J., Friedman L., Ali M., Inglehearn C.F., Toomes C. Mutations in SLC38A8 and FOXD1 in patients with nystagmus and foveal hypoplasia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58:2786. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cornish K.S., Reddy A.R., McBain V.A. Concentric macular rings sign in patients with foveal hypoplasia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:1084–1088. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ramtohul P., Comet A., Denis D. Multimodal imaging correlation of the concentric macular rings sign in foveal hypoplasia: A distinctive henle fiber layer geometry. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2020;4:946–953. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.A Rennie C., Chowdhury S., Khan J., Rajan F., Jordan K., Lamb R.J., Vivian A.J. The prevalence and associated features of posterior embryotoxon in the general ophthalmic clinic. Eye. 2004;19:396–399. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bryan J.M., Fufa T.D., Bharti K., Brooks B.P., Hufnagel R.B., McGaughey D.M. Identifying core biological processes distinguishing human eye tissues with precise systems-level gene expression analyses and weighted correlation networks. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018;27:3325–3339. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matsushita I., Morita H., Kondo H. Autosomal dominant foveal hypoplasia without visible macular abnormalities and PAX6 mutations. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2020;64:635–641. doi: 10.1007/s10384-020-00766-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cunha D.L., Owen N., Tailor V., Corton M., Theodorou M., Moosajee M. PAX6 missense variants in two families with isolated foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus: Evidence of paternal postzygotic mosaicism. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2020:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00737-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu J.Y., Ren X., Yang X., Guo T., Yao Q., Li L., Dai X., Zhang M., Wang L., Liu M., et al. Identification of a novel GPR143 mutation in a large Chinese family with congenital nystagmus as the most prominent and consistent manifestation. J. Hum. Genet. 2007;52:565–570. doi: 10.1007/s10038-007-0152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jung J., Oh E.H., Shin J.-H., Kim H.-S., Choi S.Y., Choi K.-D., Lee C., Choi J.-H. Identification of a novel GPR143 mutation in X-linked ocular albinism with marked intrafamilial phenotypic variability. J. Genet. 2018;97:1479–1484. doi: 10.1007/s12041-018-1024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–423. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu S., Kuht H.J., Moon E.H., Maconachie G.D., Thomas M.G. Current and emerging treatments for albinism. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Surace E.M., Domenici L., Cortese K., Cotugno G., Di Vicino U., Venturi C., Cellerino A., Marigo V., Tacchetti C., Ballabio A., et al. Amelioration of both Functional and Morphological Abnormalities in the Retina of a Mouse Model of Ocular Albinism Following AAV-Mediated Gene Transfer. Mol. Ther. 2005;12:652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gargiulo A., Bonetti C., Montefusco S., Neglia S., Di Vicino U., Marrocco E., Della Corte M., Domenici L., Auricchio A., Surace E.M. AAV-mediated Tyrosinase Gene Transfer Restores Melanogenesis and Retinal Function in a Model of Oculo-cutaneous Albinism Type I (OCA1) Mol. Ther. 2009;17:1347–1354. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song Y., Zhang Y., Chen M., Deng J., Sui T., La L., Li Z. Functional Validation of Albinism-Associated Tyrosinase T373K SNP by CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) in Rabbit. SSRN Electron. J. 2018;36:517–525. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rim J.H., Lee S.-T., Gee H.Y., Lee B.J., Choi J.R., Park H.W., Han S.-H., Han J. Accuracy of Next-Generation Sequencing for Molecular Diagnosis in Patients With Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:1376–1385. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Turnbull C., Scott R.H., Thomas E., Jones L., Murugaesu N., Pretty F.B., Halai D., Baple E., Craig C., Hamblin A., et al. The 100 000 Genomes Project: Bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ. 2018;361:k1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Taylor R.L., Arno G., Poulter J.A., Khan K.N., Morarji J., Hull S., Pontikos N., Martin A.R., Smith K.R., Ali M., et al. Association of Steroid 5α-Reductase Type 3 Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation With Early-Onset Retinal Dystrophy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:339–347. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Adzhubei I., Jordan D.M., Sunyaev S.R. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr. Protoc. Human Genet. 2013;76:7–20. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sim N.-L., Kumar P., Hu J., Henikoff S., Schneider G., Ng P.C. SIFT web server: Predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W452–W457. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schwarz J.M., Cooper D.N., Schuelke M., Seelow D. MutationTaster2: Mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:361–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The variants reported in this paper have been deposited into the ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information under accession numbers RCV001270481, SCV001450776, SCV001450777 and SCV001450778.