Abstract
D-type cyclin (cyclin D, CYCD), combined with cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), participates in the regulation of cell cycle G1/S transition and plays an important role in cell division and proliferation. CYCD could affect the growth and development of herbaceous plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, by regulating the cell cycle process. However, its research in wood plants (e.g., poplar) is poor. Phylogenetic analysis showed that in Populus trichocarpa, CYCD3 genes expanded to six members, namely PtCYCD3;1–6. P. tomentosa CYCD3 genes were amplified based on the CDS region of P. trichocarpa CYCD3 genes. PtoCYCD3;3 showed the highest expression in the shoot tip, and the higher expression in young leaves among all members. Therefore, this gene was selected for further study. The overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 in plants demonstrated obvious morphological changes during the observation period. The leaves became enlarged and wrinkled, the stems thickened and elongated, and multiple branches were formed by the plants. Anatomical study showed that in addition to promoting the differentiation of cambium tissues and the expansion of stem vessel cells, PtoCYCD3;3 facilitated the division of leaf adaxial epidermal cells and palisade tissue cells. Yeast two-hybrid experiment exhibited that 12 PtoCDK proteins could interact with PtoCYCD3;3, of which the strongest interaction strength was PtoCDKE;2, whereas the weakest was PtoCDKG;3. Molecular docking experiments further verified the force strength of PtoCDKE;2 and PtoCDKG;3 with PtoCYCD3;3. In summary, these results indicated that the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 significantly promoted the vegetative growth of Populus, and PtoCYCD3;3 may interact with different types of CDK proteins to regulate cell cycle processes.
Keywords: CYCD3, CDK, cell division, leaf development, Populus, secondary growth
1. Introduction
Cyclin is a key regulator of cell cycle progression. Cyclins have been classified into several classes on the basis of sequence similarity, expression pattern, and protein activity during the cell cycle [1]. Among them, plant D-type cyclin (CYCD) cDNAs were first isolated from Arabidopsis [2] and alfalfa [3] because of their ability to functionally complement yeast strains defective in G1 cyclin-deficiency. These cDNAs are defined as CYCDs in accordance with the sequence homology with animal CYCD and the presence of conserved LxCxE (where x represents any amino acid) motif [4,5,6]. Each class of cyclin is divided into several subclasses, and many family members exist in each subclass. For example, in Arabidopsis CYCD, the CYCDs are divided into seven subclasses (CYCD1–7), of which CYCD3 has three members, namely, CYCD3;1–3 [1]. The kinase activity present in heterodimers formed by cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) is a major cell cycle regulator [7]. The binding site of cyclin and CDK is approximately 100 amino acids long and called the cyclin box [8]. The different domains that bind to cyclin are used as the standard for CDK classification. Different types of CDK contain different conserved domains [9,10]. CYCD is considered to regulate the G1-to-S transition [11]. Many growth factors, such as cytokinin, auxin, brassinolide, and sucrose, regulate the expression of CYCD [12]. When stimulated by environmental factors, CYCD combines with CDK to form an inactive CYCD/CDK complex. This complex is activated by CDK-activating kinase (CAK). Then, it stimulates the expression of S-phase related genes via the RBR/E2F/DP pathway [12].
The overexpression of AtCYCD3;1 increased the number of epidermal cells on the adaxial epidermis of leaves but failed to form apparent spongy tissue and palisade tissue [13]. The overexpression of AtCYCD3 in tobacco altered the structure of the apical meristem and accelerated the initiation of leaf development [14]. The transgenic plants that overexpressed NtCYCD3;4 not only grew faster than wild-type plants but also had smaller cells in young leaves and reduced cell numbers [15]. These findings demonstrated that many plant CYCD3 members are involved in the differentiation of meristems, and they influence the development of leaves. Analysis of Arabidopsis CYCD3 triple loss of function mutants showed that the stem and hypocotyl diameters of the mutants were significantly reduced due to the decreased mitotic activity of the cambium cells [16]. Mutants cycd3;1 and cycd3;1-3 showed thinner roots than the wild type, and the number of vascular cells in plants of mutant cycd3;1 was substantially decreased [17]. These functional loss experiments confirmed that Arabidopsis CYCD3 affects the differentiation and proliferation of vascular cambium cells. Although CYCD plays a vital role in the cell cycle process, the research involving CYCD function has only been conducted in herbaceous plants, such as Arabidopsis and tobacco, and few studies have reported on the function of CYCD in woody plants [18]. In woody plant stems, the activation of cambium cells is related to the thickness of the stem [19], and leaf development is directly related to plant photosynthesis and vegetative growth [20]. Therefore, it has a great theoretical and application value to study the function of CYCD3 in woody plants.
Populus tomentosa is a widely cultivated tree species of economic importance in China. A relatively complete system of genetic transformation has been developed in P. tomentosa, which makes this species one of the most significant tree species for forest genetic research [21]. Six homologous CYCD3 genes were examined in this study to document their expression and role in Populus trichocarpa. Five PtoCYCD3 genes were identified and amplified in P. tomentosa based on the CDS region of P. trichocarpa CYCD3 genes. PtoCYCD3;3 was selected as the target gene by examining the gene expression patterns in various tissues. Phenotypic analysis of the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 in P. tomentosa found that PtoCYCD3;3 not only promoted leaf cell division but also increased the thickness of secondary xylem and secondary phloem by increasing cambium cell activity, thereby promoting vegetative growth of plants. In this study, the effects of PtoCYCD3;3 on Populus growth and development were examined and CDK family members that interact with PtoCYCD3;3 were analyzed, laying a foundation for further exploration of the molecular mechanism of cyclins in woody plants.
2. Results
2.1. Identification of Members of CYCD3 Subtype and Analysis of Tissue Expression Patterns in P. tomentosa
A total of 24 full-length CYCD candidate genes were obtained via searching homologies in the P. trichocarpa genome by TblastN, using Arabidopsis CYCD genes as a template. CDD domain detection showed that most of the genes have typical and complete CYCD conserved domains, while PtCYCD1;1, PtCYCD5;3 and PtCYCD6;2 were partially misannotated with truncated protein structures. Thus, we manually revised these sequences based on poplar EST database in NCBI, or the sequences of their phylogenetic closet paralogs (Table S1). Phylogenetic analysis between them and the Arabidopsis CYCD family showed that these poplar CYCD genes and Arabidopsis clustered into six large branches (Figure 1A marked with red dots), and each branch had a high support rate. The branching of the gene tree closely resembled the pattern of the subtype classification of Arabidopsis CYCD, suggesting that the Populus CYCD was also mainly divided into six different subtypes, namely CYCD1, CYCD2/4, CYCD3, CYCD5, CYCD6, and CYCD7. These candidate genes were named on the basis of the classification and the location of the genes in the genome of P. trichocarpa. The phylogenetic tree revealed that some CYCD subtypes expanded independently after the divergence of Populus and Arabidopsis. For example, CYCD1, CYCD3, and CYCD6 were the largest subtypes in P. trichocarpa, containing seven, six, and five members, respectively, whereas those in Arabidopsis contains one, three, and one member, respectively. The number of amino acid residues encoded by the CYCD of P. trichocarpa was between 257 and 386.
Six CYCD3 genes were examined for homologous patterns of nucleotides in P. trichocarpa. Five PtoCYCD3 genes were identified and amplified in P. tomentosa based on the CDS region of P. trichocarpa CYCD3 genes. Among them, PtoCYCD3;4 was not amplified. The expression levels of six different tissues of P. tomentosa under normal growth conditions were detected using RT-qPCR to analyze the tissue expression pattern of PtoCYCD3. The results showed that the five PtoCYCD3 members exhibited divergent temporal and spatial expression patterns (Figure 1B). PtoCYCD3;1, PtoCYCD3;5 and PtoCYCD3;6 had the highest expression in the young leaf, PtoCYCD3;2 in the mature leaf, while PtoCYCD3;3 in shoot tip, respectively. We also integrated the transcript profiles of CYCD3 type homologous genes previously reported in Populus tremula and Populus trichocarpa [22,23]. In Populus trichocarpa, all the members also showed differential expression patterns, but the similarity is that all showed high or relatively high expression in young leaf (Figure S1). In Populus tremula, homologous genes of PtoCYCD3;3, PtoCYCD3;5 and PtoCYCD3;6 were detected in the apical meristem regions of stem, shoot and root (Figure S2). All together, PtoCYCD3;3 and its homologs were generally detected in the meristems in the poplar species. Thus, it was selected as our research target to explore its regulation for poplar growth and development.
2.2. Overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 Promotes the Vegetative Growth of Populus
35S::PtoCYCD3;3 was transformed into P. tomentosa via the Agrobacterium-mediated leaf disc method, and ten transgenic lines were used to measure growth parameters (Figure 2). We randomly selected three lines of the 10 transgenic lines for expression measurement. Three lines of Pro35S::PtoCYCD3;3 were measured with increased expression levels (Figure 2E). The growth parameters of these three transgenic lines were listed in Figure S3. The phenotype of the overexpressed plants intensively changed during the morphological observation period compared to the wild-type plants, with increased plant height, branching, thickened stems, and enlarged leaves and wrinkles (Figure 2A). The phenotypic effect of PtoCYCD3;3 on Populus was characterized by measuring the plant height, stem thickness, internode number, internode length, and leaf length and width at 70, 100, 130, and 170 days after potting. That the plant height of the overexpressed plants was significantly higher than that of the wild-type plants during the growth process from 70 days to 170 days (p < 0.01) (Figure 2H) may be due to the increase in leaf cell number or the increase in the cell area. The measurement results of the number and length of the internode showed that the number of internodes of the overexpressed plants was significantly higher than that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.01) (Figure 2I) and the internode length of the overexpressed plants was significantly longer than that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.05) (Figure 2J). This finding showed that the increase in plant height of the overexpressed plants was caused by the increase in the number and length of the internode. The overexpressed plants began to branch at 100 days after potting. Each plant had 3–5 branches at 170 days, whereas branches never appeared in the wild-type plants (Figure 2A and Figure S4). The leaf length, leaf width, and leaf area of mature leaves were measured to detect whether the leaf size changed (Figure 2B,D,G). The results showed that the leaf length and leaf width of the overexpressed plants increased significantly (p < 0.05) (Figure 2G). The leaf area increased to 163% ± 7%. The stem thickness of the overexpressed plants increased considerably (p < 0.05) (Figure 2C,F). These results all show that overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 could significantly promote the vegetative growth of Populus.
2.3. Effect of Overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 on the Growth and Development of Poplar Leaves
The leaf area of the overexpressed plants was larger than that of the wild-type plants, may be due to the increase in leaf cell number or the increase in the cell area. The number of cells per unit area in the three sections of the adaxial epidermis of the young leaf and mature leaf was counted, including leaf base, leaf middle, and leaf tip. The results showed that in young leaves, no significant difference was found in cell number and cell size between the overexpressed plants and the wild-type plants (Figure 3A,B and Figure S5A). However, in mature leaves, the cell number in the overexpressed plants was significantly more than that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.01) (Figure 3C,D), and the cell size was significantly smaller (p < 0.05) (Figure S5B). This finding indicated that the increase in cell number, not the increase in the cell area, was the reason why the transgenic plants had larger leaves than wild-type plants during the development of young leaves to mature leaves. Moreover, the cell shape factor [13] per unit area of the leaf base, middle, and tip on the adaxial epidermis cells of young and mature leaves were detected. The results showed that the morphology of young and mature leaf cells of the overexpressed plants did not differ from that of the wild-type plants (Figure S5C,D). These results suggested that the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 promoted the division of adaxial epidermis cells of poplar leaves but did not affect the cell morphology.
Plant leaves are usually composed of leaf epidermis, palisade tissue, and spongy tissue. In this study, the longitudinal section of the leaves was observed to detect cell changes in different tissues in the leaves. The number of palisade layers of the overexpressed plants did not change compared with that of the wild-type plants, but its thickness was significantly narrower (p < 0.01) (Figure 3E,F), whereas the spongy tissue thickness did not change (Figure 3F). The thickness of the leaf cut surface was significantly narrowed (p < 0.01) (Figure 3F). This result showed that the smaller cell of the palisade tissue led to the narrowing of the leaf cut surface. Meanwhile, the number and area of palisade tissue cells were detected. The results showed that the number of palisade cells per unit area of the leaves of the overexpressed plants was significantly increased compared with that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.01), and the cell area was significantly smaller (p < 0.01) (Figure 3H,G). These results indicated that the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 promoted the division of the palisade tissue cells in poplar leaf.
In green plants, palisade tissue is the main place for leaf photosynthesis [20]. Photosynthetic electron transfer is completed by the cooperation of two photoreaction systems. Therefore, the electron transfer rate (ETR) of the leaves of the overexpressed and wild-type plants under different light intensities and the net assimilation rate (NAR) under specific light intensities were tested. The results showed that the overall change trend of the electron transfer rate of photosystem I and photosystem II in the overexpressed and wild-type plants under different light intensities was similar. The electron transfer rate raised linearly with the increase in light intensity. The increase in electron transfer rate gradually slowed down when it was close to the light saturation point. The electron transfer rate was basically stable when the light saturation point was reached. However, at the light saturation point, the maximum electron transfer rate of the overexpressed plants was considerably lower than that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A,B). The light intensity (737 μmol × m−2 × s−1) was selected after poplars reached the light saturation point to determine the net assimilation rate per unit area of the overexpressed plants. The results showed that the net assimilation rate per unit area of these plants was significantly lower than that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.01) (Figure 4C). However, the net assimilation rate of the whole leaf was higher than that of the wild-type plants due to the increase in the leaf area of the overexpressed plants (p < 0.01) (Figure 4D).
2.4. Overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 Promotes Secondary Growth of Populus Stems
Morphological experiments showed that the stem thickness of the overexpressed PtoCYCD3;3 plants increased dramatically. The vascular tissues of the second, 10th, and 20th internode of the overexpressed and wild-type plants were observed via microdissection to further clarify the influence of PtoCYCD3;3 on the radial growth of Populus stems. The young stems (second internode) of the overexpression plants did not undergo morphological changes compared with those of the wild-type plants (Figure 5A and Figure S6). The widths of the secondary phloem and secondary xylem of the 10th and 20th internode of the overexpressed plants significantly increased relative to those of the wild-type plants (p < 0.01) (Figure 5B,D,F,G), and the area of vessel cells was considerably bigger (p < 0.05) (Figure 5H).
Vascular cambium differentiates inwardly into secondary xylem and outwardly into secondary phloem through periclinal division. The cambium and its directly produced daughter cells are called cambium-derived tissues, which could be used to measure the activity of the cambium [24]. Statistics on the widths of the stem cambium-derived tissues of the 10th and 20th internode showed that the width of the cambium-derived tissues of the overexpressed plants was substantially increased compared with that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.05) (Figure 5C,E–G). This result indicated that the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 increased the activity of cambium cells in Populus stems and facilitated the differentiation of cambium cells into secondary xylem and secondary phloem, thus leading to the proliferation of secondary vascular tissue cells. Furthermore, the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 significantly resulted in the expansion of vessel cells. In short, the secondary growth of Populus stems was increased by the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3, ultimately contributing to an increase in stem growth.
2.5. Identification and Structural Analysis of Members of the CDK Family of P. tomentosa
The overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 in P. tomentosa produced an obvious phenotypic difference, and the D-type cyclin needed to form an active complex with CDK to play its role, so the interaction between PtoCYCD3;3 and CDKs was not known. Eighteen CDK genes were searched in the P. trichocarpa genome. Seventeen CDK genes were amplified in P. tomentosa based on the CDS region of P. trichocarpa CDK genes. Among them, PtoCDKG;2 was not amplified. These genes all had typical CDK conserved domains and a phylogenetic relationship with Arabidopsis CDK genes (Figure 6A). Phylogenetic analysis revealed seven different subtypes of these CDK genes, which were classified into CDKA, CDKB, CDKC, CDKD, CDKE, CDKF, and CDKG. The Arabidopsis CDK family has 14 members, of which CDKE and CDKG expanded in Populus. In Arabidopsis, these two subtypes contained one and two members, respectively; in poplar, they included two and four members, respectively.
The catalytic center of CDK includes a 300 amino-acid core with a typical folding form of protein kinase [25]. The domain includes a two-lobe structure connected by a hinge region, an amino-terminal lobe, and a carboxy-terminal lobe. The amino-terminal lobe contains five β-sheets and one α-helix (C-helix) [25]. The C-helix binds to the synergistic cyclin and helps determine the specificity of CYC-CDK binding (Figure 8). The conserved domain that binds to cyclin located on the C-helix was used as the standard for CDK classification (Figure 6B). Analysis of the sequence of 17 CDK family members of poplar with the Arabidopsis homologous proteins revealed that while the CDK subtype members in poplar expanded, their conserved domains were highly consistent with their orthologous proteins in Arabidopsis (Figure 6A,B). Among them, CDKA had PSTAIRE, CDKB had PPTALRE or PPTTLRE, CDKC had PITAIRE, CDKE had SPTAIRE, and CDKG had PLTSLRE [10].
2.6. In-Vitro Interaction Analysis between PtoCYCD3;3 and Members of the Poplar CDK Family
Yeast two-hybrid experiment was used to detect the interaction between PtoCYCD3;3 and 17 PtoCDK proteins and explore which CDK proteins interacted with PtoCYCD3;3. First, PtoCYCD3;3 and PtoCDK proteins connected to pGBKT7 and pGADT7 vectors, respectively, to form the fusion protein, and nine PtoCDK proteins (i.e., PtoCDKB1;2, PtoCDKB2;1, PtoCDKC;2, PtoCDKD;1, PtoCDKD;2, PtoCDKE;2, PtoCDKF;1, PtoCDKG;3, and PtoCDKG;4) interacted with PtoCYCD3;3 through screening of defective medium (Figure 7A). For non-interacting protein pairs of interchange expression vectors, the screening of defective medium found that PtoCDKA;1, PtoCDKB1;1, and PtoCDKB2;2 also interacted with PtoCYCD3;3 (Figure 7B). These results showed that 12 CDK proteins interacted with PtoCYCD3;3, all of which were able to grow on the corresponding defective medium, but their growth rate and colony color were distinct. The intensity of the interaction was speculated using its growth rate and color depth on the defective medium as observational indicators. Among them, PtoCDKE;2 had the strongest interaction relationship with PtoCYCD3;3, whereas PtoCDKG;3 had the weakest (Figure 7C).
Molecular docking experiment analysis of the PtoCYCD3;3-PtoCDKE;2 and PtoCYCD3;3-PtoCDKG;3 complexes showed that the docking scores of the two protein complexes were −74.51 and −70.18, respectively (Table S2). The more negative the docking score is, the better the protein–protein binding. The interaction of PtoCDKE;2 with PtoCYCD3;3 was stronger than that of PtoCDKG;3 with PtoCYCD3;3. This finding proved the reliability of the result of the Y2H experiment. The docking studies indicated that R7, S8, S9, E77, and L86, the residues in PtoCDKE;2, were involved in binding with R107, E158, T160, and R303 in PtoCYCD3;3 through salt bridge and hydrogen bond interactions (Figure 8A,B). The residues in PtoCDKG;3, E430, R431, K449, D501, and K583 were also involved in binding with E69, K76, T160, E178, and N198 in PtoCYCD3;3 through salt bridge and hydrogen bond interactions (Figure 8C,D). The binding mode of the CYCD3/CDK complex was demonstrated by molecular docking, in which the Thr160 site of CDK was not phosphorylated and had no kinase activity. Meanwhile, the T160 of PtoCYCD3;3 was easily combined with PtoCDK in the form of hydrogen bonds, thus playing an important role (Figure 8).
3. Discussion
The PtoCYCD3;3 overexpressed poplars became taller than the wild-type plants, the number of internodes increased, the length of internodes elongated, the stem thickness increased, and the leaf size increased. The number of cells per unit area increased and the cell area decreased in the adaxial epidermis and palisade tissue cells, indicating that the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 affected the leaf development by promoting leaf cell division. Studies have shown that overexpressing NtCYCD3;4 in tobacco displayed decreased cell size, no change in morphology, and increased growth rate in young leaves relative to wild-type plants [15]. The Arabidopsis cycd3;1-3 mutant showed decreased cell number and increased cell size in adaxial epidermis cells and palisade tissue cells [26]. These findings indicated that CYCD3 functions in a manner similar to that of herbaceous plants for the cell division of leaves in woody plants. The decrease in net photosynthesis rate per unit area was presumed to be caused by a decrease in the number of chloroplasts caused by the reduction in palisade tissue cells. The number of chloroplasts is directly controlled by cell size, and the promotion of chloroplast proliferation depends on the enhancement of cell expansion after mitosis [27,28]. In this study, although the net photosynthesis rate per unit area of overexpressed plants decreased, their total photosynthesis intensity increased due to the increase in the total area of their leaves. A significant increase in stem thickness and the expansion of vessel cells in overexpressed PtoCYCD3;3 poplars was apparently related to vigorous cambium cell activity that may have enhanced the differentiation and development of secondary xylem and secondary phloem. Schrader et al. found that PtCYCD3;3 was highly expressed in the cambium region [22]. Taken together, the results showed that PtoCYCD3;3 could promote the differentiation of stem cambium cells and leaf development and increase biomass by enhancing plant vegetative growth.
Although the understanding of plant cell cycle regulation increased, little is known about the composition and spatiotemporal occurrence of various CDK/CYC complexes [29]. In Arabidopsis, four CDKs interact with AtCYCD3, including AtCDKA;1, AtCDKB1;1, AtCDKB2;1, and AtCDKE;1 [29]. In the present study, 12 PtoCDKs could interact with PtoCYCD3;3 through the preliminary screening of Y2H technology. These PtoCDKs were distributed into seven CDK subtypes. This finding may imply that PtoCYCD3;3 functioned more extensively in P. tomentosa. Amino acid sequence analysis showed that the conserved amino acid residues in the C-helix of PtoCDKE;2 and PtoCDKG;3 that interacted with cyclin were located at positions 65–71 and 470–476 of the primary amino acid sequence, respectively. Molecular docking suggested that the amino acids near the conserved domains of PtoCDKE;2 and PtoCDKG;3 could interact with the amino acids in the cyclin box (Figure S7) of PtoCYCD3;3, mainly through hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. Cyclin interacts with CDK and forms transient or stable complexes that are essential for cell cycle progression [30]. Therefore, to understand the dynamics and regulation of cell cycle, the systematic identification and characterization of these protein complexes are important.
As an important factor mediating the regulation of endogenous and exogenous developmental signals on cell division, CYCD is co-regulated by a variety of plant hormones such as Auxin, cytokinin and brassinolide [31,32,33]. Constitutive expression of CYCD3 in transgenic plants allowed induction and maintenance of cell division in the absence of exogenous cytokinin [23]. When the wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants were 4 months old, quantitative analysis of hormones showed that the content of some hormones that promote cell growth and division decreased, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and trans-zeatin (TZR) (Figure S8A,C), whereas the content of abscisic acid (ABA) that inhibited plant growth increased (Figure S8D). The idea of a negative feedback loop controlling cell division at the cambium and in branching is mentioned in common between Arabidopsis and Populus secondary growth involving auxin and cytokinin [34,35].In our paper, reduction of endogenous cell division and auxin content in stem and leaf resulting from the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 might be another good example of a negative feedback loop. The brassinolide (BR) content in the leaves and stems of the overexpressed plants was significantly higher than that of the wild-type plants (p < 0.05) (Figure S8A). The increase in BR content may be a positive feedback regulation mechanism of plants or because BR and the PtoCYCD3;3 signaling pathways are consistent. Studies have shown that the expression of CYCD3 could be positively regulated by BR [31]. Furthermore, BRs regulate the differentiation of vascular tissues in the shoot, considering Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa) BR loss-of-function mutants have less xylem [36,37,38]. In BR-deficient mutants, the mitotic activity of roots and leaves was restored by the overexpression of the cell cycle gene CYCD3;1 [39,40]. The content of gibberellin (GA3) in stems increased (Figure S8E) but decreased in leaves, suggesting that plant stems and leaves have different hormonal regulation modes. A complex network involving hormones and transcription factors controls the development of axillary buds into lateral branches. Auxin, especially IAA is the main representative of this class of plant hormones, and it is involved in the regulation of branches [41]. The growth of lateral buds could be hindered by auxin [42]. In this study, the IAA content of the leaves and stems of the overexpressed plants was significantly lower than that of the wild-type plants. The decrease in auxin concentration may relieve the growth inhibition of axillary buds for the overexpressed plants to branch during the morphological observation period. Strigolactone (SL) inhibit shoot branching through the max dependent pathway in Arabidopsis [43] and the cambium activity of all max mutants in Arabidopsis is decreased [44]. In this study, overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 increased the cambium activity in the stem and produced branching (Figure 2 and Figure 5), which indicates that there may be some relation between PtoCYCD3;3 and SL. The key factor that made up the canopy was branching, which reflected the main characteristics of the canopy structure. Highly branched plants are considered to have an improved leaf area index, which increases light capture efficiency and photosynthesis, thus leading to increased biomass production [45,46,47]. A relatively complicated interaction network exists between hormones, and further study is needed for the nodes of hormone interaction.
In the present study, the overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 promoted the cell cycle G1/S transition of perennial poplars, thus accelerating the cell division of poplar meristem, such as apical buds, axillary buds, and stem cambium. It also accelerated plant vegetative growth and produced obvious branches. This finding provided research ideas and economic value for forest genetic improvement through increasing the wood yield of poplars by increasing plant biomass.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Gene Identification and Cloning
TBLASTN searches were performed with default algorithm parameters in Phytozome against the P. trichocarpa v3.0 genomes (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html), by using 51 cyclin protein sequences of Arabidopsis as queries to identify the CYCD genes in Populus. We also referenced a study in Menges et al., 2007, to ensure no genes were missed in our study (Table S1 and Figure S9). All potential candidates identified were examined using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (CDD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi?) to confirm the presence of typical Cyclin N- and C-terminal domains in the protein structures. A few of the members were partially misannotated during the automated genome annotation process. Thus, we performed manual reannotation using EST database or their phylogenetic closet paralogs (Table S1). Full-length protein sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE online service. The phylogenetic tree was established utilizing the maximum-likelihood (ML) method in PHYML software [48] with Whelan and Goldman (WAG) amino acid substitution model. The proportion of invariable sites (I) and gamma distribution (G) parameter was estimated, and the bootstrap replicates were set to 1000. AtCYCA and AtCYCB proteins were used as an outgroup. TBLASTN searches were performed with default algorithm parameters in Phytozome against the P. trichocarpa v3.0 genomes, by using 14 CDK protein sequences of Arabidopsis as queries to identify the CDK genes in Populus. The identification method of CDK genes in P. tomentosa was similar to that of CYCD genes.
PtoCYCD3 and PtoCDK genes were cloned from the cDNA of P. tomentosa leaf by using the primers listed in Table S3. The primers were designed in accordance with the reference genomic sequence of P. trichocarpa. The PCR products were cloned into the pEASY-Blunt vector (TransGen, Beijing, China) and sequenced. The CDS region of genes were isolated. The sequence of PtoCYCD3 and PtoCDK genes were listed in Table S4.
4.2. Construct Generation and Genetic Transformation
The CDS of PtoCYCD3;3 was inserted into the pBI121OB vector (Figure S10) between Bam HI and Xho I enzyme sites to generate the overexpression construct 35S::PtoCYCD3;3. Primer sequences were listed in Table S1. The construct was transformed into P. tomentosa via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The leaves were infected with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains LBA4404 carrying the recombinant plasmids. Subsequently, the leaves were cultivated on MS medium (pH 6.0) containing 100 μmol/L acetosyringone, 0.1mg/L 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 1.0 mg/L N-(Phenylmethyl)-9H-purin-6-amine (6-BA), 3% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.6% (w/v) agar for 48 h in the dark. These explants were then transferred to selective medium (MS supplemented with 0.1 mg/L NAA, 1.0mg/L 6-BA, 25mg/L kanamycin, 200mg/L cefotaxime, 3% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.6%(w/v) agar). These explants cultivated approximately eight weeks on selective medium under light, during which the medium was refreshed every two weeks. The generated shoots were cut from calli and transferred to rooting medium (WPM supplemented with 0.1 mg/L 3-indolebutyric acid, 25mg/L kanamycin, 200 mg/L cefotaxime, 1.5% (w/v) sucrose, and 0.6% (w/v) agar). At least 10 individual transgenic lines were generated for the construct.
4.3. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
Populus tomentosa Carr. (Clone 741) was used as the wild type. During the genetic transformation experiment, P. tomentosa was grown in the greenhouse at 25 °C under a 14:10–h light: dark cycle. The transgenic and wild-type plants were grown in an experimental field (Beijing, China: 39°99′N, 116°22′E) during the growing season for 6 months. Morphological features, including plant height, internode numbers, internode length, and stem diameter, were continuously measured for 170 days with 10 transgenic lines. The size of mature leaves was measured at 130 days. ImageJ was used to calculate the leaf area. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v16.0. Independent-Samples T-test was used.
4.4. RNAs Extraction, RT-qPCR and Expression Analysis
Shoot apical buds (~5 mm in length) were collected as shoot tip tissues. Young leaf, mature leaf, secondary xylem, and secondary phloem (including cambium, 20th internode counting from the tip) and root tissues were harvested from three independent 5-month-old wild-type P. tomentosa grown in a phytotron (under light and dark cycle of 16 and 8 h, respectively). After peeling off the bark of the stem segment (20th internode), phloem and xylem tissues were collected by scraping the inner surface of the bark and outer surface of the wood with a razor blade. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use.
RNAs were extracted from the samples above via RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Polysaccharides and Polyphenolics-rich) (DP441, TIANGEN, Beijing, China) and subjected to cDNA synthesis by using PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit (RR037A, TaKaRa, Japan). PtoCYCD3 transcript levels were determined via real−time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) by using TB GreenTM Premix Ex TaqTM II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (RR820A, TaKaRa, Japan) and analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCt method with the Populus Actin (GenBank number XM_002316253) housekeeping gene. Three technical repeats were performed for each pair of primers. All primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Table S3.
The expression profiles of CYCD3 type genes in Populus tremula and Populus trichocarpa were bulit using the published data in Schrader et al. and poplar eFP Browser, respectively [22,23].
4.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
The leaf tips, leaf middle, leaf base of the young leaves (third leaf counting from the tip), and the mature leaves (the 9th leaf) were taken from 4-month-old wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants. The samples (0.2–0.3 cm) were fixed in FAA solution (70% ethanol: glacial acetic acid: formaldehyde = 18:1:1) for 24 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated in graded ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% ethanol) for 15 min, and then incubated at 4 °C overnight. The 100% ethanol was replaced sequentially and separately through an isoamyl acetate series (ethanol: isoamyl acetate (3:1), ethanol: isoamyl acetate (1:1), ethanol: isoamyl acetate (1:3), and 100% isoamyl acetate) for 15 min. The samples were then dried using a Critical Point Dryer (HCP-2; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with liquid CO2 and coated with platinum using an Ion Sputter (E-1010; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The coated samples were observed and photographed with a scanning electron microscope (S-4800 FESEM; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 10 keV. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v16.0. Independent-Samples T-test was used.
4.6. Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscope (Cryo-SEM) Observations
The fresh leaves were taken from wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants to observe the internal structure of leaves. The fresh samples were cut into approximately 0.2–0.3 cm, then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and observed using cryo-scanning electron microscope (cryo-SEM) (Hitachi S-3400N, Tokyo, Japan; Quorum PP3000T, East Grinstead, UK). Data were measured using images generated by Image J. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v16.0. Independent-Samples T-test was used.
4.7. Determination of Photosynthetic Parameters
The living mature leaves of wild-type and overexpressed plants were selected to detect the photosynthetic parameters under different light intensities. The parameters of the light photosynthetic reactions were measured simultaneously at 25 °C using the Dual-PAM 100 measuring system (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). After dark adaptation for 30 min, the electron transfer rate of PSI and PSII were measured under different gradient light intensities of 0, 10, 36, 94, 214, 421, 737, 1178, and 1809 μmol × m−2 × s−1. The net assimilation rate per unit area was measured at 737 μmol × m−2 × s−1 light intensity. The net assimilation rate per unit area was multiplied by the total leaf area to obtain the total net assimilation rate. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v16.0. Independent-Samples T test was used.
4.8. Histological Analysis
The second internode, 10th internode, and 20th internode (counting from the tip) were taken from 4-month-old wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants. The samples were fixed in FAA (70% ethanol: glacial acetic acid: formaldehyde: glycerol = 18:1:1:1) for 24 h at room temperature and then dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol; 20 min each step). Ethanol was replaced with ethanol: acetone (1:1) for 20 min and then with pure acetone for 20 min two times. Afterward, the samples were sequentially infiltrated with acetone: resin (2:1) for 3 h and then with acetone: resin (1:1) and acetone: resin (1:3) for 3 h. The samples were replaced with fresh resin for 12 h. After the resin replacement was repeated two times, stem segments were embedded into the resin for 24 h at 60 °C. One µm sections were obtained with a microtome (Leica ultracut R, Germany). The sections were floated on the water, heat-fixed to glass slides, stained with 0.05% toluidine blue, and observed under a Leica DM4000B light microscope. Data were measured on Image J. We measured five times in different quadrant sectors of the cross-sections about the width of cambium-derived tissues. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v16.0. Independent-Samples T-test was used.
4.9. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays
The coding sequences of PtoCDKs were cloned into the pGADT7 vector. The coding sequence of PtoCYCD3;3 was cloned into the pGBKT7 vector. Yeast strain AH109 was co-transfected with pGBKT7 and pGADT7 constructs carrying the corresponding genes in accordance with the yeast transformation kit (SK2400-200, Coolaber, Beijing, China) and grown on SD/-Leu/-Trp or SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/+x-α-gal. No-interacting proteins interchanged vectors. Growth assays were based on Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clontech). Primer sequences were listed in Table S3.
4.10. Homology Modeling
The template crystal structures for PtoCDKE;2, PtoCDKG;3, and PtoCYCD3;3 were identified through BLAST and downloaded from RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 5IDN, 6INL, and 4BCM). Homology modeling was conducted in MOE. The protonation state of the protein and the orientation of the hydrogens were optimized by QuickPrep at pH 7 and a temperature of 300 K. First, the target sequence was aligned to the template sequence, and 10 independent intermediate models were built. These different homology models were the result of the permutational selection of different loop candidates and side-chain rotamers. Then, the intermediate model that scored best according to the GB/VI scoring function was chosen as the final model, subject to further energy minimization using the AMBER12/EHT force field.
4.11. Molecular Docking
The protein–protein docking protocol in MOE was applied for the docking of Lunasin with proteins. The smaller protein (a smaller number of residues) usually is set as ligand and the bigger one as the receptor. Here, PtoCYCD3;3 was defined as ligand and the others were the receptor, and a multi-stage method was used for generating poses and then ranking them. Starting from a coarse-grained (CG) model to reduce the computational search space, exhaustive sampling was carried out to generate a set of initial poses. The Hopf fibration was used to generate a set of uniformly-distributed rotations, and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) was used to sample all translations for a given rotation. This was followed by a minimization process that was built around a staged convergence protocol. The conformation of the best ranked was selected as the final (probable) binding mode. Molecular graphics were generated via PyMOL.
4.12. Hormone Content Assay
Leaf (from second leaf to fifth leaf) and stem (from first internode to 10th internode) were taken from 4-month-old wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants. The following method was used to determine the conventional hormone content (IAA, ABA, GA3, TZR): (1) accurately weigh approximately 0.5 g of fresh plant samples, and grind them in liquid nitrogen until crushed; (2) add 5 mL of isopropanol/hydrochloric acid extraction buffer to the powder and shake at 4 °C for 30 min; (3) add 10 mL of dichloromethane and shake for 30 min at 4 °C; (4) centrifuge at 4 °C and 13,000 rpm for 5 min and remove the lower organic phase; (5) avoid light, dry the organic phase with nitrogen, and dissolve it with 200 μL of methanol (0.1% formic acid); and (6) pass the 0.22μm-filter membrane and use HPLC-MS/MS for detection.
The following method was used to determine the BR hormone content: (1) weigh approximately 0.6 g of plant samples accurately and grind it to powder in liquid nitrogen; (2) add 10 mL of 80% methanol pre-cooled at 4 °C and extract at 4 °C for 2 h; (3) centrifuge at 10,000 rpm under 4 °C for 5 min, take the supernatant, pass the Bond Elut pre-packed column, and elute with 3 mL of methanol; (4) add 3 mL of 40 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.5) to dilute the eluent and pass through a Centricon ultrafiltration tube; (5) take the filtrate through the ultrafiltration tube, pass the Strata-X cartridge, and elute with 3 mL of methanol; (6) dry the methanol with nitrogen and add 200 µl of methanol to dissolve; (7) pass 0.22 μm-filter membrane and conduct HPLC-MS/MS detection. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v16.0. Independent-Samples T-test was used.
4.13. Accession Numbers
The sequence information of genes from P. tomentosa described in this article were deposited into GenBank. Below are the accession numbers of the P. tomentosa genes, PtoCDKA;1 (MT990424), PtoCDKB1;1 (MT990425), PtoCDKB1;2 (MT990426), PtoCDKB2;1 (MT990427), PtoCDKB2;2 (MT990428), PtoCDKC;1 (MT990429), PtoCDKC;2 (MT990430), PtoCDKD;1 (MT990431), PtoCDKD;2 (MT990432), PtoCDKD;3 (MT990433), PtoCDKE;1 (MT990434), PtoCDKE;2 (MT990435), PtoCDKF;1 (MT990436), PtoCDKG;1 (MT990437), PtoCDKG;3 (MT990438), PtoCDKG;4 (MT990439), PtoCDKG;5 (MT990440), PtoCYCD3;1 (MT990441), PtoCYCD3;2 (MT990442), PtoCYCD3;3 (MT990443), PtoCYCD3;5 (MT990444), and PtoCYCD3;6 (MT990445).
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/3/1288/s1, Figure S1: Expression of PtCYCD3 type genes based on Poplar eFP Browser, Figure S2: Expression of PtCYCD3 type genes across the wood-forming meristem sections of Populus tremula based on normalized microarray data for Schrader et al., 2004, Figure S3: Growth parameters of three overexpression lines, Figure S4: Phenotypes of wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants, Figure S5: Cell area and cell circularity on the adaxial epidermis of wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 leaves, Figure S6: Effect of overexpression of PtoCYCD3;3 on young stems of Populus, Figure S7: AtCYCD3 and PtoCYCD3 sequence alignment, Figure S8: Hormone content of wild-type and 35S::PtoCYCD3;3 plants, Figure S9: Phylogenetic tree of CYCD members from PtCYCD genes both we identified in P. trichocarpa and studied in Menges et al., 2007, PtoCYCD3 genes we sequenced in P. tomentosa, and AtCYCD genes in Arabidopsis, Figure S10: The pBI121OB vector, Table S1: All PtCYCD family members identified in the genome of P. trichocarpa in our study and correlation of PtCYCD genes studied in Menges et al., 2007, Table S2: The docking scores of proteins, Table S3: Primers used in the study, Table S4: The sequence of PtoCYCD3 and PtoCDK genes.
Author Contributions
T.L. and H.Y. designed the study; C.G., Y.X., P.J., C.H. and X.Z. performed the experiments; C.G., T.L. and H.Y. analyzed the data; C.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32071486).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wang G., Kong H., Sun Y., Zhang X., Zhang W., Altman N., DePamphilis C.W., Ma H. Genome-wide analysis of the cyclin family in Arabidopsis and comparative phylogenetic analysis of plant cyclin-like proteins. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1084–1099. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Soni R., Carmichael J.P., Shah Z.H., Murray J.A. A family of cyclin D homologs from plants differentially controlled by growth regulators and containing the conserved retinoblastoma protein interaction motif. Plant Cell. 1995;7:85–103. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dahl M., Meskiene I., Bögre L., Ha D.T., Swoboda I., Hubmann R., Hirt H., Heberle-Bors E. The D-type alfalfa cyclin gene cycMs4 complements G1 cyclin-deficient yeast and is induced in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1847–1857. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.11.1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ach R.A., Durfee T., Miller A.B., Taranto P., Hanley-Bowdoin L., Zambryski P.C., Gruissem W. RRB1 and RRB2 encode maize retinoblastoma-related proteins that interact with a plant D-type cyclin and geminivirus replication protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:5077–5086. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.9.5077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oakenfull E.A., Riou-Khamlichi C., Murray J.A. Plant D-type cyclins and the control of G1 progression. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2002;357:749–760. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dewitte W., Murray J.A. The plant cell cycle. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003;54:235–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garza-Aguilar S.M., Lara-Núñez A., García-Ramírez E., Vázquez-Ramos J.M. Modulation of CycD3;1-CDK complexes by phytohormones and sucrose during maize germination. Physiol. Plant. 2017;160:84–97. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nugent J.H.A., Alfa C.E., Young T., Hyams J.S. Conserved structural motifs in cyclins identified by sequence analysis. J. Cell Sci. 1991;99:669–674. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.2.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Menges M., de Jager S.M., Gruissem W., Murray J.A. Global analysis of the core cell cycle regulators of Arabidopsis identifies novel genes, reveals multiple and highly specific profiles of expression and provides a coherent model for plant cell cycle control. Plant J. 2005;41:546–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tank J.G., Thaker V.S. Cyclin dependent kinases and their role in regulation of plant cell cycle. Biol. Plant. 2011;55:201–212. doi: 10.1007/s10535-011-0031-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Potuschak T., Doerner P. Cell cycle controls: Genome-wide analysis in Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:501–506. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Inzé D., De Veylder L. Cell cycle regulation in plant development. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2006;40:77–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dewitte W., Riou-Khamlichi C., Scofield S., Healy J.M., Jacqmard A., Kilby N.J., Murray J.A. Altered cell cycle distribution, hyperplasia, and inhibited differentiation in Arabidopsis caused by the D-type cyclin CYCD3. Plant Cell. 2003;15:79–92. doi: 10.1105/tpc.004838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boucheron E., Healy J.H.S., Bajon C., Sauvanet A., Rembur J., Noin M., Sekine M., Riou Khamlichi C., Murray J.A.H., Van Onckelen H., et al. Ectopic expression of Arabidopsis CYCD2 and CYCD3 in tobacco has distinct effects on the structural organization of the shoot apical meristem. J. Exp. Bot. 2004;409:123–134. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo J., Wang M.H. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the Nicta;CycD3;4 gene demonstrate accelerated growth rates. BMB Rep. 2008;41:542–547. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2008.41.7.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Collins C., Maruthi N.M., Jahn C.E. CYCD3 D-type cyclins regulate cambial cell proliferation and secondary growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015;66:4595–4606. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Randall R.S., Miyashima S., Blomster T., Zhang J., Elo A., Karlberg A., Immanen J., Nieminen K., Lee J.Y., Kakimoto T., et al. AINTEGUMENTA and the D-type cyclin CYCD3;1 regulate root secondary growth and respond to cytokinins. Biol. Open. 2015;4:1229–1236. doi: 10.1242/bio.013128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zheng T., Zhuo X., Li L., Cheng T., Zhang Q. Genome-Wide Analysis of the D-type Cyclin Gene Family Reveals Differential Expression Patterns and Stem Development in the Woody Plant Prunus mume. Forests. 2019;10:147. doi: 10.3390/f10020147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ko J.H., Han K.H., Park S., Yang J. Plant body weight-induced secondary growth in Arabidopsis and its transcription phenotype revealed by whole-transcriptome profiling. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1069–1083. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.038844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang X.X. Botany. 2nd ed. China Agriculture Press; Beijing, China: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Du N., Liu X., Li Y., Chen S., Zhang J., Ha D., Deng W., Sun C., Zhang Y., Pijut P.M. Genetic transformation of Populus tomentosa to improve salt tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. (PCTOC) 2011;108:181–189. doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-0026-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schrader J., Nilsson J., Mellerowicz E., Berglund A., Nilsson P., Hertzberg M., Sandberg G. A high-resolution transcript profile across the wood-forming meristem of poplar identifies potential regulators of cambial stem cell identity. Plant. Cell. 2004;16:2278–2292. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.024190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wilkins O., Nahal H., Foong J., Provart N.J., Campbell M.M. Expansion and Diversification of the Populus R2R3-MYB Family of Transcription Factors. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:981–993. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.132795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sehr E.M., Agusti J., Lehner R., Farmer E.E., Schwarz M., Greb T. Analysis of secondary growth in the Arabidopsis shoot reveals a positive role of jasmonate signalling in cambium formation. Plant J. 2010;63:811–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04283.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krauss G. Biochemistry of Signal Transduction and Regulation. 3rd ed. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dewitte W., Scofield S., Alcasabas A.A., Maughan S.C., Menges M., Braun N., Collins C., Nieuwland J., Prinsen E., Sundaresan V., et al. Arabidopsis CYCD3 D-type cyclins link cell proliferation and endocycles and are rate-limiting for cytokinin responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14537–14542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704166104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jasinski S., Leite C.S., Domenichini S., Stevens R., Raynaud C., Perennes C., Bergounioux C., Glab N. NtKIS2, a novel tobacco cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor is differentially expressed during the cell cycle and plant development. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2003;41:667–676. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00082-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kawade K., Horiguchi G., Ishikawa N., Hirai M.Y., Tsukaya H. Promotion of chloroplast proliferation upon enhanced post-mitotic cell expansion in leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boruc J., Van den Daele H., Hollunder J., Rombauts S., Mylle E., Hilson P., Inzé D., De Veylder L., Russinova E. Functional modules in the Arabidopsis core cell cycle binary protein-protein interaction network. Plant. Cell. 2010;22:1264–1280. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.073635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jonas B., Inzé D., Nathalie G. The cell-cycle interactome: A source of growth regulators? J. Exp. Bot. 2014;65:2715–2730. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hu Y.X., Bao F., Li J.Y. Promotive effect of brassinosteroids on cell division involves a distinct CycD3-induction pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000;24:693–701. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Swarup R., Parry G., Graham N., Allen T., Bennett M. Auxin cross-talk: Integration of signalling pathways to control plant development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002;49:411. doi: 10.1023/A:1015250929138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Riou-Khamlichi C., Huntley R., Jacqmard A., Murray J.A.H. Cytokinin Activation of Arabidopsis Cell Division Through a D-Type Cyclin. Science. 1999;283:1541–1544. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5407.1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baima S., Forte V., Marco Possenti M., Penalosa A., Leoni G., Salvi S., Felici B., Ruberti I., Morelli G. Negative feedback regulation of auxin signaling by ATHB8/ACL5-BUD2 transcription module. Mol. Plant. 2014 doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Milhinhos A., Prestele J., Bollhoner B., Matos A., Vera-Sirera F., Rambla J.L., Ljung K., Carbonell J., Blazquez M.A., Tuominen H., et al. Thermospermine levels are controlled by an auxin-dependent feedback loop mechanism in Populus xylem. Plant J. 2013;75:685–698. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Caño-Delgado A., Yin Y., Yu C., Vafeados D., Mora-García S., Cheng J.C., Nam K.H., Li J., Chory J. BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development. 2004;131:5341–5351. doi: 10.1242/dev.01403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nakamura A., Fujioka S., Sunohara H., Kamiya N., Hong Z., Inukai Y., Miura K., Takatsuto S., Yoshida S., Ueguchi-Tanaka M., et al. The role of OsBRI1 and its homologous genes, OsBRL1 and OsBRL3, in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;140:580–590. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.072330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ibañes M., Fàbregas N., Chory J., Caño-Delgado A.I. Brassinosteroid signaling and auxin transport are required to establish the periodic pattern of Arabidopsis shoot vascular bundles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:13630–13635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906416106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.González-García M.P., Vilarrasa-Blasi J., Zhiponova M., Divol F., Mora-García S., Russinova E., Caño-Delgado A.I. Brassinosteroids control meristem size by promoting cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis roots. Development. 2011;138:849–859. doi: 10.1242/dev.057331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhiponova M.K., Vanhoutte I., Boudolf V., Betti C., Dhondt S., Coppens F., Mylle E., Maes S., González-García M.P., Caño-Delgado A.I., et al. Brassinosteroid production and signaling differentially control cell division and expansion in the leaf. New Phytol. 2013;197:490–502. doi: 10.1111/nph.12036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ljung K. Auxin metabolism and homeostasis during plant development. Development. 2013;140:943–950. doi: 10.1242/dev.086363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Leyser O. The control of shoot branching: An example of plant information processing. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32:694–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gomez-Roldan V., Fermas S., Brewer P.B., Puech-Pages V., Dun E.A., Pillot J.P., Letisse F., Matusova R., Danoun S., Portais J.C., et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature. 2008;455:189–194. doi: 10.1038/nature07271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Agusti J., Herold S., Schwarz M., Sanchez P., Ljung K., Dun E.A., Brewer P.B., Beveridge C.A., Sieberer T., Sehr E.M., et al. Strigolactone signaling is required for auxin-dependent stimulation of secondary growth in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:20242–20247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111902108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Broeckx L.S., Verlinden M.S., Vangronsveld J., Ceulemans R. Importance of crown architecture for leaf area index of different Populus genotypes in a high-density plantation. Tree Physiol. 2012;32:1214–1226. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ceulemans R., Stettler R.F., Hinckley T.M., Isebrands J.G., Heilman P.E. Crown architecture of Populus clones as determined by branch orientation and branch characteristics. Tree Physiol. 1990;7:157–167. doi: 10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Muhr M. Ph.D. Thesis. The Georg-August University School of Science; Göttingen, Germany: 2015. Branching Control Mechanisms in the Model Tree Populus: Analyzing the Role of Strigolactones and BRANCHED1. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Guindon S., Delsuc F., Dufayard J.F., Gascuel O. Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009;537:113–137. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.