Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Microbiology
. 2020 Oct;12(5):404–410. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v12i5.4600

Survey of Salmonella infections in broiler farms in Iran during 2013–2014: a cross-sectional study

Fereshteh Ansari 1,2, Saied Bokaie 3, Seyed Mostafa Peighambari 4, Mohammad Hosein Fallah 5, Farshad Tehrani 6, Abolfazl Rajab 6, Seyed Ali Ghafouri 6, Maryam Shabani 6, Hadi Pourjafar 7,8,*
PMCID: PMC7867690  PMID: 33603994

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Salmonella at broiler breeder farms of Iran and investigate the factors underlying salmonellosis in these farms. This is a cross-sectional investigation conducted in 23 provinces of Iran.

Materials and Methods:

Fecal samples were collected from 139 broiler breeder farms in the country and standard bacteriological tests were carried out on the samples for the isolation of Salmonella. The serological tests were then applied for the samples that were positive in the bacteriological test. The information on the sampled farms extracted from the Iran GIS-VET Monitoring and Surveillance System was used for the analysis of the risk factors.

Results:

A total of 11 farms out of the 139 sampled farms were infected with Salmonella with the largest number of infected cases related to Tehran and Fars Provinces.

Conclusion:

The statistical analysis results showed that flocks with older ages and farms with larger number of houses are at greater risk of Salmonella infection.

Keywords: Salmonella, Salmonellosis, Broiler breeder, Poultry, Risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Salmonella affects a wide range of animal hosts. Human salmonellosis is one of the important zoonotic disease. Enteric fever, typhoid fever, food infection, diarrhea and gastroenteritis are various forms of Salmonellosis in human. The global burden of infection with non-typhoid Salmonella is annually estimated to be 93.8 million cases of gastroenteritis and 155,000 deaths (1).

Salmonella infection in poultry are considered to be of great public health importance. Several studies performed in the USA and Europe demonstrated that consumption of undercooked chicken and eggs infected with Salmonella is one of the major sources of Salmonellosis in humans (2); however, the origin and the modes of transmission of this infection are not well studied in developing countrie (1).

The bacterium Salmonella is able to transfer vertically. It can consequently leads to the contamination of hatcheries and broiler houses. The infection may persist throught the supply chain and during slaughter and meat packing and cause a major risk for the consumers.

Some stereotypes of Salmonella, including Salmonella Enteritidis, may be colonized in the oviducts and infect them during the formation of eggs, but all Salmonella serotypes have the potential to penetrate the eggs through the shell after their formation and infect the produced eggs (3).

Salmonella can be transmitted to eggs vertically and from the brood. In addition, poultry farms may be infected in different ways, including, infected food and water, and entry of rodents and insects carrying Salmonella. Infected birds also transmit the infection to their surrounding environment and birds (2, 4). It is shown that although there are different ways of infection of broiler chicken farms, the major way of their infection is the infection of hatchery by the Salmonella bacteria (5).

Any controlling measure taken against Salmonella needs to be associated with the top-down policy; i.e. infection should be controlled first at the level of breeders, so that infection cannot be transmitted to lower levels of breeding. Salmonella control requires formulating a surveillance program for regular sampling and taking appropriate control measures. In this regard, the first step to formulate a surveillance program is to determine the infection status and the factors underlying infection (6, 7).

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of motile Salmonella at broiler breeder farms of Iran and to investigate the factors underlying Salmonellosis in these farms. This study was conducted throughout the country and the information obtained in this study can be helpful for the policy-makers of poultry health and industries associated with the production of broiler breeders and chickens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling.

This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2013 to March 2014 in 23 provinces of the country. It is noteworthy that 25 provinces of Iran have broiler breeder farms, and all of these 25 provinces were participated in this project except for Khuzestan and Ardabil Provinces. A total of 139 broiler breeder farms were selected as the research sample using the stratified random sampling method and based on the number of farms in each province. Two fecal samples, 150-gram each, were collected from every breeding poultry house and then transferred to the central laboratory of the province within 24 hours. Attempts were made to collect the fecal samples from different parts of the poultry houses so that these two samples of feces could represent the feces of all parts of the poultry house.

Isolation and identification of Salmonella.

Each fecal sample (25 g) was added to Buffered Peptone Water (225 ml, 25°C) and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. Then 1 ml of each diluted sample was transferred to 9 ml of selenite cystine broth and Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth, and were incubated (42°C/24 h for Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium and 37°C/24 h for Selenite-Sistein medium). At the next stage (Isolation), Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate (XLD) agar, McConkey agar, and Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar as Differential-Selective media were used to detect probable Salmonella colonies after incubation the plates at 37°C for 24–48 h. Suspected colonies (colorless colonies in McConkey and SS agars; pink colonies with black centers in XLD agar) were picked fo identification. The suspected colonies were cultured in Triple Sugar Iran (TSI) agar, Lysine Iron (LI) agar, Urea agar, and tested by standard methods including IMVIC and Oxidase tests. For final confirmation, positive micro-organisms in the former chemical tests underwent serological tests. Somatic (O) polyvalent antiserum was used for serogrouping. Each Salmonella isolated colonies of the pure culture of TSI slants were mixed with 8.5% saline onto a slide. After checking for autoagglutination, one drop of O polyvalent antiserum (A–S) was added and mixed with the bacterial emulsion and the result was read on the black background, in front of the lamp. The agglutination that occurred before 2 minutes, was considered positive. In this case, the experiment was repeated for all the contained antisera of the polyvalent antiserum to identify the isolated Salmonella serogroup (812).

Risk factors.

In this study, eight possible risk factors associated with the occurrence of Salmonella infection was assessed. The season of sampling was documented as well as information about breed and age of the brood at the time of sampling. We also obtained data about farm managements (including single or multi age systems, manure collection techniques and presence or absence of appropriate farm fencing) and size of the farm (the capacity of the farm and the number of poultry houses).

Information related to these factors on the sampled chicken farms was adapted from the Iran GIS-VET Monitoring and Surveillance System (a nationwide information database for poultry farms which is only available for Iranian Veterinary organization) and was used for the analysis of the risk factors. Farms with at least one bacteriological positive samples were considered infected.

Statistical analysis.

This information and the results of the Salmonella detection tests were entered into the SPSS ver. 21 for statistical analysis. The relationship between Salmonellosis and the qualitative variables under study was tested using the Chi-square test. The odds ratio (OR) and its confidence interval were calculated and reported using univariate logistic regression. The variables significantly correlated with Salmonellosis (P <0.1) were selected for the final model at this step. At the next step, the correlation between the independent variables was examined, and one of the correlated variables was selected to be entered into the final model considering its biological fitness. The final multivariate regression model was obtained using the forward selection.

RESULTS

A total of 11 farms (7.9%) out of the 139 breeder farms studied in 2013–2014 were positive for Salmonellosis with 95% confidence intervals (3.0% to 12.4%). The positive samples belonged to Tehran, Fars, Mazandaran, Kerman, West Azerbaijan and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Provinces with the large number of positive cases in Tehran and Fars compared to the other provinces (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of Salmonella positive and Salmonella negative sampled farms.

The average age of the birds at the farms where they were sampled was 46.90 with the standard deviation of 20.51 weeks. Among the 11 positive samples, five samples belonged to the serogroup D (45.4%), three samples to serogroup C (27.3%), and two samples to serogroup B (18.2%), and the serogroup of one of the samples (9.1%) was unknown. The results indicated that the infected and the uninfected chicken farms had no significant statistical difference in terms of their Farm capacity, breed, manure collection techniques, presence or absence of appropriate farm fencing and season of sampling (P>0.05) (Tables 1 and 2). The final regression model showed that the infected farms were significantly different from the uninfected ones in the number of their poultry houses (P=0.037) and age (P=0.019) (Table 3).

Table 1.

Distribution (Frequancy (Percentage)) and monovariable analysis of qualitative explanatory variables of Salmonella sp. contamination in broiler breeder farms (139 farms).

Definition of variables Salmonella sp. negative Salmonella sp. positive Odds Ratio (OR) 95% Confidence interval (CI) P Value

n (%) n (%)
Multiple age systemc
Yes 116 (95.1) 8 (72.7) 7.2 1.8–28.8 0.005*
No 6 (4.9) 3 (27.2)
Appropriate farm fencingc
Yes 119 (97.5) 11 (100.0) 0 0–15.2 0.599
No 3 (2.4) 0 (0.0)
Farm has damping equipmentc
Yes 115 (94.3) 11 (100.0) 0 0–6.2 0.414
No 7 (5.7) 0 (0.0)
Season of samplinga
Spring 22 (17.2) 1 (9.1) - - -
Summer 45 (35.1) 6 (54.5) 2.9 0.3–140.9 0.313
Autumn 36 (28.1) 3 (27.3) 1.8 0.1–100.5 0.605
Winter 25 (19.5) 1 (9.1) 0.9 0.1–72.2 0.929
Breedbc
Ross 98 (80.3) 7 (63.6) - - -
Cobb 18 (14.7) 4 (36.4) 3.1 0.6–13.7 0.080*
Hy-Line 2 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 0 0–30.7 0.709
Arbor Acres 2 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 0 0–30.7 00.709
Arian 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0 - 0.789
Bonz 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0 - 0.789

The odds ratio (OR) and its confidence interval were calculated and reported using univariate logistic regression.

*

Significant P values with significance level of 0.100.

a

Spring regarded as baseline category.

b

Ross regarded as baseline category-Arian and Bonz was not included in the analysis because of low sample size.

c

For these variables data was only available for 133 farms.

Table 2.

Distribution (Mean ± SD) and mono-variable analysis of quantitative explanatory variables of Salmonella sp. contamination in broiler breeder farms (139 farms).

Definition of variables Salmonella sp. negative Salmonella sp. positive Odds Ratio (OR) 95% Confidence interval (CI) P Value
Age (Weeks) 45.3 ± 19.9 65.0 ± 19.3 1.0 1.0–1.0 0.005*
Poultry- size (no. of broiler breeders of farm) 35564.4 ± 17000.0 42727.3 ± 20386.7 1.0 1.0–1.0 0.195
Number of poultry houses of the farm 5.9 ± 3.4 9.0 ± 5.2 1.2 1.0–1.36 0.014*

The odds ratio (OR) and its confidence interval were calculated and reported using univariate logistic regression.

*

Significant P values with significance level of 0.100.

Table 3.

Final mixed logistic-regression model of risk factors for Salmonella sp. contamination of in broiler breeder farms (139 farms).

Definition of variables Odds Ratio (OR) 95% Confidence interval (CI) P Value
Multiple age system age system 4.9 0.8–30.9 0.87
Cobb (Breed) 0.4 0.4–3.8 0.440
Age (Weeks) 1.0 1.0–1.0 0.019*
Number of poultry houses of the farm 1.2 1.0–1.4 0.037*

Results of multivariable logistic regression analysis -Intercept = 0.006

*

Significant P values with significance level of 0.05.

DISCUSSION

It is extremely important to detect infection with Salmonella at broiler and breeder farms as it leads to infection in broiler chickens and then into the produced poultry meat. This study revealed that 7.9 percent of the breeder farms under study were infected with Salmonella sp. A study conducted in 2011 in Iran estimated the prevalence of infection with Salmonella at broiler breeder farms as 9.7 percent (13). Various studies conducted over the last ten years show the prevalence of infection with Salmonella at broiler chicken farms in Iran is between 22.5 and 64.2 percent (14, 15), and the prevalence of infection with Salmonella in the chicken slaughterhouses were shown to be between 11.6 and 47 percent (16, 17). We think that our study probably underestimate the true prevalace of Salmonella infection. It was the first national attempt to determine the prevalence of Salmonella infection in broiler breeder farms all over the country, so we encountered several problems to coordinate sampling and laboratory techniques in different provinces. These pitfalls might cause failing to detect Salmonella in some of the infected farms.

Salmonellosis can also increase along the production chain and ultimately leads to the contamination of the chicken meat used by consumers (18).

In this study, Serogroups D (45.4%) and C (27.3%) had the highest rate of infection, respectively, but the serotypes were unfortunately not determined due to the unavailability of appropriate diagnostic facilities and reagents. In another similar study performed in 2011 in Iran, the highest rate of infection in the poultry breeders belonged to Serogroup D (13). Salmonella Enteritidis, the major Salmonella serotype causing diseases in humans, belongs to Serogroup D. Salmonella Infantis and Salmonella Newport are two important serotypes shown in North America and Europe to be among the major causes of Salmonellosis in humans which are in Serogroup C (19). Accordingly, infection serogroups D and C can be important in terms of public health. One limitation of this study was that the PCR test was not performed on Salmonella isolates. This test could considerably help to detect the important serotypes causing this infection.

The present study showed that the age of brood was related to Salmonellosis at broiler breeder farms in Iran, however; this association was very slight. It is in accordance with previous obseravtions which shows the older the chickens, the more likely it will be for them to be infected, and infection will also gradually increase in the farm during the breeding period, which may lead to the brood’s infection with Salmonella (2). Other studies conducted on the risk factors of infection with Salmonella in poultry farms have also shown the older age of the brood to be one of the risk factors of Salmonella (2024).

There was a significantly larger number of poultry houses in the infected farms than the uninfected ones in this study (P=0.037). In most cases, breeder farms adopt strict measures concerning the biosecurity principles and standards and it is highly important to take such preventive measures to prevent the entry of infectious agents including the Salmonella bacteria to poultry breeding farms (25, 26). Taking preventing measures against Salmonella infection such as changing clothes, taking shower, sterilizing boots and controlling rodents and insects would be more difficult at poultry farms with multiple poultry houses. Large breeder farms with multiple chicken houses, especially the ones with multi-age production systems are more likely to become infected with Salmonella at any points prior or after production. In other words, the greater the number of broiler poultry houses, the probability of isolating Salmonella bacteria from at least one house of the farm will be higher. Larger number of farms have also been previously shown to be associated with increased risk of Salmonellosis in poultry breeder farms (27, 28).

There are some inconsistancies between the results of our study and previous studies. For instance, the findings of this study indicate that there is no relationship between Salmonellosis and the capacity of chicken farms, whereas in other similar studies it has been shown to be a main factor for Salmonella infection in a poultry house (1618, 20). Another risk factor was the different age system. We expected to see a statistical relationship with this factor and Salmonella infection, however according the final logistic model there was no significant association in this case (20, 21, 27). We think that it may be due to our small positive samples which decreased the power of our study to detect statistically significant difference between Salmonella infection and the different age system. The existence of proper fences around the farm and being equipped with manure collection equipment are two management factors which we expected to be associated with Salmonella infection, but the present research has reached contradictory results regarding this relationship. It should be noticed that more than 90% of sampled farms had proper fencing and were equipped with manure collection equipment. So it was a consistent factor between farms, making it almost impossible to detect differences between positive and negative farms. The two factors, breed (28) and season (29, 30) have also been shown by few studies to be associated with Salmonella infections, whereas these two factors were shown by this study to be insignificant in Salmonellosis at broiler breeder farms.

In conclusion, due to the high prevalence of Salmonellosis at breeder farms in Iran and the limited impact of management factors on Salmonellosis in these farms, it is necessary to adopt effective measures to prevent and control Salmonella at broiler breeder farms in this country. More effective control measures, including vaccination of broods, can help reduce infection in poultry farms and consequently along the chicken meat production chain. Regular sampling for early detection of infected broods is extremely important in this regard. As the results obtained in this study show that there is a greater possibility of Salmonellosis with the greater age of broods, prioritizing sampling at the farms of older breeders with shorter intervals is recommended.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kagambèga A, Lienemann T, Aulu L, Traoré AS, Barro N, Siitonen A, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella enterica from the feces of cattle, poultry, swine and hedgehogs in Burkina Faso and their comparison to human Salmonella isolates. BMC Microbiol 2013; 13: 253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rasschaert G. (2007). Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella and Campylobacter contamination of poultry during transport and slaughter: Ghent University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55747754.pdf
  • 3. Berghaus R, Mathis D, Bramwell R, Macklin K, Wilson J, Wineland M, et al. Multilevel analysis of environmental Salmonella prevalences and management practices on 49 broiler breeder farms in four south-eastern States, USA. Zoonoses Public Health 2012; 59: 365– 374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bokaie S, Ansari F, Peighambari S, Mahmoudi M, Fallah M, Tehrani F, et al. Investigation of the prevalence and risk factors of Salmonella in broiler breeder farms in Iran during 2013–2014. IJE 2016; 12: 32– 39. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bailey J, Stern N, Fedorka-Cray P, Craven S, Cox N, Cosby D, et al. Sources and movement of Salmonella through integrated poultry operations: a multistate epidemiological investigation. J Food Prot 2001; 64: 1690– 1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wegener HC, Hald T, Wong LF, Madsen M, Korsgaard H, Bager F, et al. Salmonella control programs in Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9: 774– 780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Murray K, Tremblay C, Rghei A, Warriner K. Challenges and options for Enhancing Salmonella control in partially cooked breaded poultry products. Curr Opin Food Sci 2018; 20: 44– 50. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yang Q, Domesle KJ, Ge B. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for Salmonella detection in food and feed: current applications and future directions. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2018; 15: 309– 331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ansari F, Pourjafar H, Bokaie S, Peighambari SM, Mahmoudi M, Fallah MH, et al. Association between poultry density and Salmonella infection in commercial laying flocks in Iran using a Kernel Density. Pak Vet J 2017; 37: 299– 304. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. de Freitas CG, Santana ÂP, da Silva PHC, Gonçalves VSP, Barros MdAF, Torres FAG, et al. PCR multiplex for detection of Salmonella Enteritidis, Typhi and Typhimurium and occurrence in poultry meat. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 139: 15– 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lungu B, Waltman WD, Berghaus RD, Hofacre CL. Comparison of a real-time PCR method with a culture method for the detection of Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis in naturally contaminated environmental samples from integrated poultry houses. J Food Prot 2012; 75: 743– 747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hossain KMM, Hossain MT, Yamato I. Seroprevalence of Salmonella and Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chickens in Rajshahi and surrounding districts of Bangladesh. Int J Biol 2010; 2: 74– 80. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Akbarian R, Peighambari S, Morshed R, Yazdani A. Survey of Salmonella infection in Iranian poultry flocks. Iran J Vet Res 2012; 8: 5– 10. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Morshed R, Peighambari SM. Salmonella infections in poultry flocks in the vicinity of Tehran. Int J Vet Res 2010; 4: 273– 276. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ansari-Lari M, Shekarforoush S, Mehrshad S, Safari H. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella spp. colonization in broiler flocks in Shiraz, southern Iran. Vet Res Forum 2014; 5: 65– 68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jamshidi A, Afshari Nik S. Detection of Salmonella spp. contamination of carcasses slaughtered in poultry abattoir in Mashhad, Iran. Arch Razi Inst 2007; 62: 229– 233. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rahmani M, Peighambari SM, Svendsen CA, Cavaco LM, Agersø Y, Hendriksen RS. Molecular clonality and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Infantis from broilers in three Northern regions of Iran. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9: 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wegener HC. Danish initiatives to improve the safety of meat products. Meat Sci 2010; 84: 276– 283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Salm-Surv WG, Organization WH. Progress report (2000–2005): building capacity for laboratory-based foodbor ne disease sur veillance and outbreak detection and response. WHO 2006. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43424
  • 20. Huneau-Salaün A, Marianne C, Françoise L, Isabelle P, Sandra R, Virginie M, et al. Risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica contamination in 519 French laying hen flocks at the end of the laying period. Prev Vet Med 2009; 89: 51– 58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Snow L, Davies R, Christiansen K, Carrique-Mas J, Cook A, Evans S. Investigation of risk factors for Salmonella on commercial egg-laying farms in Great Britain, 2004–2005. Vet Rec 2010; 166: 579– 586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Odoch T, Wasteson Y, L’Abée-Lund T, Muwonge A, Kankya C, Nyakarahuka L, et al. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and risk factors associated with non-typhoidal Salmonella on Ugandan layer hen farms. BMC Vet Res 2017; 13: 365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fagbamila IO, Mancin M, Barco L, Ngulukun SS, Jambalang A, Ajayi OT, et al. Investigation of potential risk factors associated with Salmonella presence in commercial laying hen farms in Nigeria. Prev Vet Med 2018; 152: 40– 47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chousalkar K, Gast R, Martelli F, Pande V. Review of egg-related salmonellosis and reduction strategies in United States, Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Crit Rev Microbiol 2018; 44: 290– 303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Henken A, Frankena K, Goelema J, Graat E, Noordhuizen J. Multivariate epidemiological approach to salmonellosis in broiler breeder flocks. Poult Sci 1992; 71: 838– 843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Denagamage T, Jayarao B, Patterson P, Wallner-Pendleton E, Kariyawasam S. Risk factors associated with Salmonella in laying hen farms: systematic review of observational studies. Avian Dis 2015; 59: 291– 302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mollenhorst H, Van Woudenbergh C, Bokkers E, De Boer I. Risk factors for Salmonella enteritidis infections in laying hens. Poult Sci 2005; 84: 1308– 1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fris C, Van den Bos J. A retrospective case-control study of risk factors associated with Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis infections on Dutch broiler breeder farms. Avian Pathol 1995; 24: 255– 272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Namata H, Méroc E, Aerts M, Faes C, Abrahantes JC, Imberechts H, et al. Salmonella in Belgian laying hens: An identification of risk factors. Prev Vet Med 2008; 83: 323– 336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Van Hoorebeke S, Van Immerseel F, Schulz J, Hartung J, Harisberger M, Barco L, et al. Determination of the within and between flock prevalence and identification of risk factors for Salmonella infections in laying hen flocks housed in conventional and alternative systems. Prev Vet Med 2010; 94: 94– 100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES