Skip to main content
Global Cardiology Science & Practice logoLink to Global Cardiology Science & Practice
. 2020 Dec 31;2020(3):e202033. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2020.33

Journey to the center of the heart: Bilateral absent superior vena cava with heart block

Ahmed Elborae 1,2,, Ramy Doss 1,2, Mahmoud Shaaban 1,3, Ahmed A Elkhouly 1,4, Mohamed Abdullah 1, Khalid Sorour 1
PMCID: PMC7868095  PMID: 33598493

Abstract

Bilaterally absent superior vena cava (SVC) is extremely rare anomaly with a few case reports in the literature. Without associated congenital cardiac disease, these anomalies are asymptomatic. This report describes an adult patient with bilaterally absent SVC presenting with Mobitz type II heart block and a structurally normal heart.

Case report

A previously healthy 59-year-old male Egyptian patient presented to the emergency department following a syncopal attack. He also reported progressive shortness of breath and bilateral lower limb oedema over the last couple of months. On examination, his blood pressure was 180/110 mmHg with a regular pulse of 30 beats per minute. Chest examination revealed bilateral diminished air entry over the lung base with fine inspiratory crepitation. He also showed bilateral pitting lower limb oedema up to the knee. His cardiac examination revealed muffled s1 with normal s2 and no additional sounds or murmur. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed and revealed Mobitz type II heart block with 3:1 conduction (Figure 1).

Figure 1. A rhythm strip ECG showing Mobitz type II heart block with 3:1 conduction.

Figure 1.

While attempting insertion of temporary pacing wire from the right internal jugular vein (IJV) toward the superior vena cava (SVC); it would rather take a left para-median course and cross the infra-diaphragmatic border caudally.

A contrast injection into that vessel suggested that it might be a dilated azygous vein. Surprisingly, the venous flow was reversed towards the inferior caval vein (IVC). Successful temporary right ventricular pacing was easily achieved from the right femoral venous access through the IVC into the right atrium and ventricle. The patient reported immediate improvement and was transferred to the intermediate care unit for observation. There were no laboratory abnormalities that could explain this conduction defect. Trans-thoracic echocardiography revealed concentric left ventricular hypertrophy with dilated left atrium and dilated IVC. A computed tomography (CT) chest with contrast confirmed the absence of both SVC with both brachiocephalic veins draining into azygous vein to the IVC (Figure 2). Permanent pacing was achieved through epicardial leads. (Figure 3).

Figure 2. A CT chest with 3D reconstruction.

Figure 2.

It shows bilateral absence of the SVC with both innominate veins drain into the azygous vein that joins the IVC eventually. CT: Computerized tomography, SVC: superior vena cava, IVC: inferior vena cava.

Figure 3. Limited sternotomy showing epicardial lead insertion.

Figure 3.

Discussion

During the fourth gestational week, the right and the left anterior cardinal veins drain the upper portion of the embryo. Each anterior cardinal vein drains into a common cardinal vein before entering the embryological heart.

By the eighth gestational week, a venous anastomosis connects the two anterior cardinal veins while the left common cardinal vein completely regresses to become the ligament of Marshall. With this regression, the anastomotic vein between the two precardinal veins becomes the brachio-cephalic vein and the right precardinal vein and the right common cardinal vein form the SVC. Failure of this normal regression can lead to the formation of a persistent left SVC, the most common venous abnormality.1

Very rarely, bilateral regression of common cardinal veins occurs leading to the bilateral absence of the superior vena cava. The left and right head and neck veins connect to the azygos and hemiazygos veins, respectively. Then it drains into the right atrium, inferior vena cava, left renal vein, or a complex subdiaphragmatic plexus of veins.2

To our knowledge, only 14 cases were reported to have bilaterally absent SVC. The true prevalence of this condition is unknown but is probably much higher. Most cases were diagnosed either incidentally during chest imaging3,4,5 or during a complicated vascular access during pacemaker implantation for complete heart block6,7 or electrophysiological ablation procedure.8 In one case, superior vena cava syndrome was reported in an adult male with bilateral absent SVC.9

The association between absent superior vena cava and conduction block, as in our case, has been previously reported in two octogenarian patients.6,7 Such association is more likely to be a coincidence, with the absent SVC being unmasked by need for temporary pacemaker insertion. Another possibility is an associated developmental abnormality of conduction system that accelerated sclerodegenerative changes. Some embryological studies have shown that the sinus venosus myocardium is incorporated in the AV canal in the posterior region of the AVN. The ‘pacemaker field’ was shown to be embedded in the zone that also generates other cardiac-related tissues, including the vena cava.10 This hypothesis remains unproven given the rarity of the condition and absent reports of early-onset heart block associated with bilateral absent SVC in literature.

Follow up

The patient is doing fine and is currently asymptomatic.

Conclusion

Despite its rarity, the awareness about bilateral absent SVC anomaly is essential in setting of transvenous procedures as cardiac device implantation as well as some cardiac (e.g., Glenn procedure) and non-cardiac surgeries (e.g., hepatectomy), where clamping of the inferior vena cava would likely lead to death due to total venous obstruction.

Abbreviations List

CT

Computed tomography.

ECG

Electrocardiogram.

IJV

Internal jugular vein.

IVC

Inferior vena cava.

SVC

Superior vena cava.

References

  • 1.Goyal SK, Punnam SR, Verma G, Ruberg FL. Persistent left superior vena cava: a case report and review of literature. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bansal M, Strainic J, Ashwath R. Bilateral absence of superior vena cava. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(4):1031–1033. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0357-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ou P, Calcagni G, Marini D, et al. Unusual systemic venous return with absence of superior caval veins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(5):1368–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saunders RN, Richens DR, Morris GK. Bilateral absence of the superior vena cava. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(6):2041–2043. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02562-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Minniti S1, Visentini S, Procacci C. Congenital anomalies of the venae cavae: embryological origin, imaging features and report of three new variants. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(8):2040–55. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1241-x. Epub 2002 Mar 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hussain SA, Chakravarty S, Chaikhouni A, Smith JR. Congenital absence of superior vena cava: unusual anomaly of superior systemic veins complicating pacemaker placement. PACE. 1981;4(3):328–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1981.tb03704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Del Ojo JL, Jimenez CD, Vilches PJ, Serrano FLA, Gutlerrez JL, Rodriguez B. Absence of the superior vena cava: difficulties for pacemaker implantation. PACE. 1999;22(7):1103–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quraishi MB, Mufti O, Wase A. Absent left and right superior vena cava and azygos continuation of inferior venacava:a rare anomaly of systemic venous return. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22(8):E159–E161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Luni Zhang MM, Li Zhang MM, Hui Wang MD, Libo Chen MD. Bilateral absence of the superior vena cava presenting with superior vena cava syndrome: A case report. Echocardiography. 2019;36(8) doi: 10.1111/echo.14423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kelder TP, Vicente-Steijn R, Harryvan TJ, et al. The sinus venosus myocardium contributes to the atrioventricular canal: potential role during atrioventricular node development? J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19(6):1375–89. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Global Cardiology Science & Practice are provided here courtesy of Magdi Yacoub Institute

RESOURCES