The coronary arterial system consists of a continuous network of functionally distinct vessels of decreasing size.1 The epicardial arteries (>500 μm) have primarily a conductance function and, therefore, physiologically offer minimal resistance to flow. The microcirculation, including pre-arterioles (100 to 500 μm) and arterioles (<100 μm), on the other hand, is the main active determinant of resistance within the coronary tree, responsible for the metabolic regulation of regional blood flow to the myocardium.1,2
Structural and/or functional abnormalities in coronary microcirculation (i.e., coronary microvascular dysfunction, CMD), occurring in a wide spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, are classifiable into four groups1 (Figure 1):
Figure 1. Classification of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
CMD: coronary microvascular dysfunction. CAD: coronary artery disease. CMP: cardiomyopathies. HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. DCM: dilated cardiomyopathy. Group 1: Metabolic dysregulation due to dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking, diabetes and metabolic syndrome may impair microvascular structure and endothelium dependent and independent vascular function.18 Group 2: CMD has been reported in both primary cardiomyopathies (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Anderson-Fabry disease and amyloidosis) and secondary hypertrophy settings (aortic stenosis and hypertension).19–21 Group 3: Chronic coronary obstruction can trigger CMD that may persist even after successful revascularization.22,23 In revascularized acute coronary syndromes CMD may be responsible for suboptimal reperfusion (i.e., “no reflow” phenomenon24), caused by endothelial injury and/or distal embolization and is associated with adverse cardiovascular events in STEMI patients.25 Group 4: After percutaneous coronary intervention, vasoconstriction due to epicardial and arteriolar alfa adrenergic receptors activation26 and embolization of plaque deriving material in the microcirculation may cause microinfarcts affecting long term clinical outcome.27
-
(1)
Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial diseases,
-
(2)
Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the presence of myocardial diseases,
-
(3)
Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the presence of obstructive CAD,
-
(4)
Iatrogenic coronary microvascular dysfunction.
CMD is an intricate and often key component of heart pathophysiology. It arises from changes in both microvascular function and structure and is strongly associated with endothelial dysfunction. CMD is highly prevalent and determines the fate of numerous chronic heart diseases, but may be pivotal also in acute conditions such as acute myocardial infarction and various types of shock. Hence, the growing necessity of a deeper understanding of microcirculatory pathophysiology and developing effective therapeutic interventions.
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection3, and a leading cause of intensive care unit morbidity and mortality.4 Cardiac involvement in septic patients is associated with severe outcome 5,6 and coronary microcirculation is of paramount importance in this setting. CMD due to inflammatory dysregulation is part of the wider spectrum of CMD and, although not included in the original classification, appears classifiable as a type 1 dysfunction. In septic patients, endothelial proinflammatory activation increases endothelial permeability leading to myocardial oedema, which has been reported in both experimental and clinical sepsis. 7,8 Acute myocardial oedema has severe pathophysiological consequences including systolic9 and diastolic dysfunction, in both active (cross bridge detachment) and passive (myocardial stiffness) components.10,11 Such impairment continues even after the resolution of the oedema.12 Furthermore, inflammatory stimuli upregulate cell adhesion molecules and enhance leucocyte adhesion and activity exposing the myocardium to contractile depressant factors (e.g., TNF alfa and IL-1) and reactive oxygen species.13
In a recent issue of the journal, McBride et. al14 provide important insights into sepsis-related microvascular dysfunction, by reviewing its peculiar pathogenesis and features as compared to dengue fever-associated shock. As reviewed by the Authors, septic shock and dengue share common pathophysiological features including reduced endothelial (nitric oxide) dependent vasodilation, endothelial and immune system cell activation, glycocalyx shedding and plasma leakage through slack endothelial junctions. The latter phenomenon, however, is exaggerated in dengue shock, while microvascular tone impairment appears less marked compared to septic shock. The reasons behind the peculiar behaviour and specific pattern of dengue shock remain unresolved and may involve the degradation of glycocalyx components mediated by viral glycoprotein non-structural 1 (NS1) and the excessive host inflammatory response to dengue infection.
While largely unexplained, this pathophysiological difference has important management implications, implying a greater need for fluid-based rather than vasopressor-mediated approach in dengue shock, as opposed to classic septic shock.
Research into novel treatment for microvascular dysfunction remains an unmet clinical need both in the acute (sepsis, STEMI) and chronic (hypertensive heart disease, microvascular angina, cardiomyopathies) setting. Data on the use of platelet inhibitors are insufficiently established to provide clinical recommendations. Yet, clinical studies investigating the adenosine-mediated vasodilator effect of ticagrelor are ongoing.15 Furthermore ACE inhibitors and statins may counteract oxidative stress and may be benefit in patients with CMD, particularly when associated with the classic cardiovascular risk factors.16 In other contexts such as cardiomyopathies, however, promising preclinical studies have failed to translate into successful clinical results.17 Further research is urgently warranted on this anatomically micro, clinically macro, problem.
References
- 1.Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):830–840. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra061889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Coronary microvascular disease pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic options. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72(21):2625–2641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States*: Critical Care Medicine. 2013;41(5):1167–1174. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parrillo JE. Septic shock in humans: advances in the understanding of pathogenesis, cardiovascular dysfunction, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(3):227. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blanco J, Muriel-Bombín A, Sagredo V, et al. Incidence, organ dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis: a Spanish multicentre study. Critical Care. 2008;12(6):R158. doi: 10.1186/cc7157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vasques-Nóvoa F, Laundos TL, Cerqueira RJ, et al. MicroRNA-155 Amplifies Nitric Oxide/cGMP signaling and impairs vascular angiotensin II reactivity in septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2018;46(9):e945–e954. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schmittinger CA, Dünser MW, Torgersen C, et al. Histologic pathologies of the myocardium in septic shock: a prospective observational study. Shock. 2013;39(4):329–335. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318289376b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pratt JW, Schertel ER, Schaefer SL, et al. Acute transient coronary sinus hypertension impairs left ventricular function and induces myocardial edema. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1996;271(3):H834–H841. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.3.H834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Davis MB, Arany Z, McNamara DM, Goland S, Elkayam U. Peripartum Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;75(2):207–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miyamoto M, McClure DE, Schertel ER, et al. Effects of hypoproteinemia-induced myocardial edema on left ventricular function. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1998;274(3):H937–H944. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.3.H937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dongaonkar RM, Stewart RH, Geissler HJ, Laine GA. Myocardial microvascular permeability, interstitial oedema, and compromised cardiac function. Cardiovascular Research. 2010;87(2):331–339. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kumar S, Peters S, Thompson T, et al. Familial cardiological and targeted genetic evaluation: Low yield in sudden unexplained death and high yield in unexplained cardiac arrest syndromes. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(11):1653–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McBride A, Chanh HQ, Fraser JF, Yacoub S, Obonyo NG. Microvascular dysfunction in septic and dengue shock: Pathophysiology and implications for clinical management. Global Cardiology Science and Practice. 2020;2020(2) doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2020.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vilahur G, Gutiérrez M, Casani L, et al. P2Y12 antagonists and cardiac repair post-myocardial infarction: global and regional heart function analysis and molecular assessments in pigs. Cardiovascular Research. 2018;114(14):1860–1870. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pizzi C, Manfrini O, Fontana F, Bugiardini R. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase in Cardiac Syndrome X: Role of Superoxide Dismutase Activity. Circulation. 2004;109(1):53–58. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100722.34034.E4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.De Gregorio MG, Fumagalli C, Tomberli A, et al. Myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy receiving perindopril (CARAPaCE): a pilot study. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2020 doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001144. Publish Ahead of Print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Badimon L, Bugiardini R, Cenko E, et al. Position paper of the European Society of Cardiology–working group of coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation: obesity and heart disease. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(25):1951–1958. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marcus ML, Harrison DG, Chilian WM, et al. Alterations in the coronary circulation in hypertrophied ventricles. Circulation. 1987;75(2):I19–I25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brush JE, Cannon RO, Schenke WH, et al. Angina due to coronary microvascular disease in hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(20):1302–1307. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811173192002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Camici PG, Olivotto I, Rimoldi OE. The coronary circulation and blood flow in left ventricular hypertrophy. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2012;52(4):857–864. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duncker DJ, Koller A, Merkus D, Canty JM. Regulation of coronary blood flow in health and ischemic heart disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2015;57(5):409–422. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Niccoli G, Montone RA, Lanza GA, Crea F. Angina after percutaneous coronary intervention: The need for precision medicine. International Journal of Cardiology. 2017;248:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Montecucco F, Carbone F, Schindler TH. Pathophysiology of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: novel mechanisms and treatments. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(16):1268–1283. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.de Waha S, Patel MR, Granger CB, et al. Relationship between microvascular obstruction and adverse events following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient data pooled analysis from seven randomized trials. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(47):3502–3510. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.el-Tamimi H, Davies GJ, Sritara P, Hackett D, Crea F, Maseri A. Inappropriate constriction of small coronary vessels as a possible cause of a positive exercise test early after successful coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1991;84(6):2307–2312. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.84.6.2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cavallini C, Savonitto S, Violini R, et al. Impact of the elevation of biochemical markers of myocardial damage on long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the CK-MB and PCI study. European Heart Journal. 2005;26(15):1494–1498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

