Skip to main content
Annals of Dermatology logoLink to Annals of Dermatology
. 2020 Dec 30;33(1):52–60. doi: 10.5021/ad.2021.33.1.52

Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Study on Age-Related Facial Characteristics in Korean Females

Soon-Hyo Kwon 1, Jong Woo Choi 1, Hee Jin Kim 2, Woo Shun Lee 3, Minsu Kim 4, Jung-Won Shin 4, Jung-Im Na 4, Kyoung-Chan Park 4, Chang-Hun Huh 4,
PMCID: PMC7875215  PMID: 33911812

Abstract

Background

Understanding the age-related morphological changes of facial soft tissue is fundamental in achieving improved outcomes of rejuvenating procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry is a reliable and convenient anthropometric tool to assess facial soft tissue.

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish age-related facial soft tissue morphology in Korean adult females using non-invasive 3D photogrammetry.

Methods

One hundred and ninety-two female participants were divided into three groups based on age: the younger group (aged 20~39 years), middle group (40~59 years), and older group (60~79 years). Thirty-six landmarks were identified via 3D photogrammetric scanning (Morpheus 3D, Morpheus Co., Ltd., Seongnam, Korea). Forty-one facial dimensions were analyzed using the imaging software to find significance between the age groups.

Results

Smaller upper-facial volume (p=0.019) and shorter upper-facial height (p=0.034) were observed in the older group than in the younger group. In the mid-face, narrowed palpebral fissure (p<0.001) with elongated upper eyelid height (p<0.001) and widened nose (p<0.001) were observed in the older group compared with the younger group. Longer lower-facial height (p<0.001) with longer and wider philtrum (p<0.001, p=0.004, respectively), shorter lower vermilion height (p<0.001), wider mouth width (p<0.001), and smaller lower vermilion angle (p<0.001) were seen in the older group when compared with the younger group. Moreover, greater angles of nasofrontal, nasomental, and labiomental angle (p=0.015, p=0.015, p=0.080, respectively), and smaller nasofacial angle (p=0.034) were observed in the older group than in the younger group.

Conclusion

Our results provide clues of aging-related facial morphological characteristics in Korean female population.

Keywords: Aging face, Anthropometry, Photogrammetry, Three-dimensional

INTRODUCTION

Face is an outward representation of an individual's unique identity, allowing it to be used to discriminate one person from another. Face undergoes morphological alterations with aging. These changes include volumetric change, redistribution of subcutaneous fat, progressive bone resorption, and decreased tissue elasticity1. Facial aging and its consequence on facial morphology are important in the aesthetic medical field.

Anthropometry refers to the systematic measurement of the physical properties of the human body, primarily the dimensional descriptions, including length and angle. Anthropometry, especially facial anthropometry, is essential in the fields of aesthetic and reconstructive medicine. We have recently reported facial anthropometric differences between beauty pageant contestants and ordinary young female of Korean ethnicity, identifying factors that are commonly associated with beauty2. Facial anthropometry also provides the average of standard values in planning reconstructive surgery in treating congenital or post-traumatic facial deformities. It is also utilized in the field of forensic science to analyze human physical variation and to provide biological profile for identifying a decedent.

Classical facial anthropometry has been used to identify the differences in facial dimensions between sex or ethnicity3,4,5. Contrastingly, to the best of our knowledge, age-related facial anthropometric data has not been investigated to any significant degree, and existing data is limited to certain age ranges. Moreover, three-dimensional (3D), quantitative data on normal subjects in their third-fourth decades of life and beyond are still incomplete6. Although Zhuang et al.7 attempted to determine sex-, ethnicity-, and age-specific facial dimensions, they included subjects with various ethnicities—mainly Caucasians (47%)—into the age groups in analyzing anthropometric data. Yang et al.8 identified facial anthropometric differences between adolescents and adults of Chinese Han ethnicity, however, age-related morphological change in adults was not demonstrated in the study. The studies of Raschke et al.9 and Sforza et al.6 described age-related anthropometric changes in Caucasians and Italians, respectively, however, their results were limited to the perioral area. Considering that facial morphology undergoes age-related changes, not only ethnicity- or sex-specific data, but also age-specific data on facial anthropometry is necessary for the aesthetic field. Nowadays, an increasing number of people undergo cosmetic procedures, including volume augmentation for facial rejuvenation10. However, the lack of age-related facial morphological change often results in ‘artificial’ or ‘operated’ appearance after the rejuvenating procedure10. Comprehensive understanding on age-related facial anthropometry could facilitate rejuvenating procedure to result in a natural young appearance.

The aim of this study was to investigate age-related characteristics in facial soft tissue morphology in the cohort of Korean female adults. We carried out 3D photogrammetry in 192 Korean females aged between 20 and 79 years. They were divided into three age groups—younger group, middle group, and older group—to identify any significance in their facial dimensions. There have been a few studies demonstrating the facial anthropometric characteristics of the Korean ethnicity, however, age-related characteristics of facial morphology specific to Korean females have not been fully investigated. Results of the study by Kim et al.11 revealed age-related morphological changes in Korean female, but were confined to the perioral area. Although Kim and Shin12 and Baik et al.13 carried out 3D anthropometry study in Korean adults, they were limited to an analysis of sex-specific differences with respect to facial dimensions. Our study provides a comprehensive understanding of the age-related facial morphological changes in the Korean female population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 3D photogrammetric analysis was performed in 192 Korean female participants enrolled in the present study. Participants with a body mass index of between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 were included to eliminate the effect of overweight or underweight on facial soft tissue measurements14. Participants with histories of facial deformity, craniofacial syndromes, severe facial asymmetry, or histories of previous plastic surgery were excluded. They were divided into three groups based on age: the younger group (20~39 years), middle group (40~59 years), and older group (60~79 years).

Three-dimensional photogrammetry

Morpheus 3D® light-emitting diode-based light scanner (Morpheus Co., Ltd., Seongnam, Korea) was used to acquire the 3D facial images of participants. The participants sat upright in neutral head position without makeup. Scanning was performed three times per participant at the frontal and 45° oblique (right and left) views at 60 cm from the face under the same brightness. After reconstructing the 3D facial image by merging three scanned images, the entire scanned image was automatically reoriented. The horizontal plane contains the right and left pupils (P) and nasion (N'). The sagittal plane is perpendicular to the horizontal plane, which contains the nasion (N') and subnasale (Sn). The coronal plane is perpendicular to the other two planes. Various facial landmarks were defined on the reconstructed 3D facial image (Fig. 1). Based on the landmarks, measurements of volumes, ratios, lengths, and angles were analyzed using Morpheus 3D Plastic Solution (Morpheus Co., Ltd.). We received the patient's consent form about publishing all photographic materials.

Fig. 1. Landmarks and their definitions in the three-dimensional photogrammetry. Rh: rhinion, SB: supratip breakpoint, Crn: columella, ULP: upper lip point, LLP: lower lip point, Gn': gnathion, Obs: otobasion superius, Zy: zygomatic point, Obl: otobasion inferius, Go': gonion.

Fig. 1

Ethics statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonization and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, which was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (no. B-1810/497-103). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before study enrollment.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). p-values were obtained using the one-way ANOVA with post hoc test with the Bonferroni correction to determine the significance for the volumes, lengths, and angles among the three groups. p-values<0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. The statistical outcomes are presented as the mean±standard deviation.

RESULTS

A total of 192 female participants enrolled in the study were grouped according to age. The younger group included 48 subjects (mean age of 26.4±5.0 years), the middle group included 56 subjects (51.3±5.3 years), and the older group included 88 subjects (69.0±6.2 years). A total of 41 facial measurements, including 4 volumes, 23 lengths, 12 angles, and 2 ratios in Korean females, are summarized in the Table 1.

Table 1. The facial dimensions measured in the three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis.

Facial dimension Definition Younger group Middle group Older group p-value
Volume measure (ml)
 Total facial volume Volume of Tr-T (Rt)-C-Me′ 1112.89±145.31 1099.23±100.39 1124.59±115.84 0.464
 Upper-facial volume Volume of Tr-C′-G′ 153.76±35.50 137.18±33.17 138.01±33.56 0.019*
 Mid-facial volume Volume of G′-C′-T(Rt)-D′-Sn 569.94±66.98 558.66±49.86 572.04±59.08 0.393
 Lower-facial volume Volume of Sn-D′-E′-Me′ 389.19±67.67 403.39±47.64 414.54±58.86 0.464
Frontal view
 Total facial height (mm) Distance of Tr-Me′ 187.05±8.20 187.65±7.39 188.60±8.02 0.634
 Vertical ratio Upper-facial height: Mid-facial height: Lower-facial height 0.76:1:0.89 0.73:1:0.92 0.72:1:0.92
Upper-face
 Upper-facial height (mm) Distance of Tr′-G′ 53.64±4.92 51.48±5.28 51.19±5.68 0.034*
Mid-face
 Mid-facial height (mm) Distance of G′-Sn 70.81±3.55 70.68±3.67 71.43±4.12 0.458
 Palpebral fissure width (mm) Mean distance of Ex (Rt)-En (Rt) and Ex (Lt)-En (Lt) 26.26±1.58 25.56±1.48 23.46±1.67 0.000*
 Palpebral fissure height (mm) Mean distance of Ps (Rt)-Pi (Rt) and Ps (Lt)-Pi (Lt) 9.16±1.18 8.00±1.31 6.61±1.24 0.000*
 Intercanthal width (mm) Distance of En (Rt)-En (Lt) 36.29±3.17 34.03±2.68 35.71±3.41 0.001*
 Interpupillary width (mm) Distance of P (Rt)-P (Lt) 61.28±2.99 60.70±2.68 60.94±2.67 0.557
 Binocular width (mm) Distance of Ex (Rt)-Ex (Lt) 88.81±4.11 85.15±4.14 82.29±5.81 0.000*
 Upper eyelid height (mm) Mean Distance of Os (Rt)-Ps (Rt) and Os (Lt)-Ps (Lt) 13.42±2.33 14.07±2.54 15.42±2.82 0.000*
 Nasal width (mm) Distance of Al (Rt)-Al (Lt) 39.59±2.30 40.52±2.57 43.83±2.78 0.000*
 Nasal height (mm) Distance of N′-Sn 51.88±2.74 51.26±2.94 52.02±3.27 0.326
 Horizontal ratio Palpebral fissure width (Rt): Intercanthal width: Palpebral fissure width (Lt) 0.73:1:0.73 0.76:1:0.75 0.66:1:0.66
 Palpebral fissure slant (°) Mean angle of [Ex (Rt)-En (Rt)-Pi (Rt)] and [Ex (Lt)-En (Lt)-Pi (Lt)] 8.03±2.56 7.42±2.54 6.59±6.32 0.213
Lower-face
 Lower-facial height (mm) Distance of Sn-Me′ 62.60±4.27 65.39±3.58 65.72±4.05 0.000*
 Philtrum height (mm) Distance of Sn-Ls 12.94±2.09 15.15±1.61 15.47±2.04 0.000*
 Philtrum width (mm) Distance of Chp (Rt)-Chp (Lt) 12.73±1.42 12.63±1.21 13.36±1.54 0.004*
 Upper lip height (mm) Distance of Sn-Stm 19.85±2.11 22.09±1.64 22.49±2.17 0.000*
 Upper vermilion height (mm) Distance of Ls-Stm 6.91±1.26 6.94±1.19 7.03±1.26 0.853
 Lower vermilion height (mm) Distance of Stm-Li 9.58±1.41 9.11±1.55 8.32±1.68 0.000*
 Lower lip height (mm) Distance of Stm-B′ 17.34±1.75 17.08±1.60 16.78±1.99 0.221
 Mouth width (mm) Distance of Ch (Rt)-Ch (Lt) 44.45±2.87 45.87±3.20 47.77±3.51 0.000*
 Upper vermillion angle (°) Mean angle of [Ls-Ch (Rt)-Stm] and [Ls-Ch (Lt)-Stm] 37.58±4.96 33.03±5.61 32.43±5.62 0.814
 Lower vermillion angle (°) Mean angle of [Li-Ch (Rt)-Stm] and [Li-Ch (Lt)-Stm] 37.00±4.67 34.91±6.45 30.82±5.59 0.000*
 Cupid′s bow angle (°) Mean angle of [Ch (Rt)-Chp (Rt)-Ls] and [Ch (Lt)-Chp (Lt)-Ls] 157.99±8.34 157.39±6.56 159.16±7.10 0.340
Lateral view
 Length from T to N′ (mm) Distance of T (Rt)-N′ 89.76±4.84 90.95±4.43 90.89±4.65 0.329
 Length from T to Pn (mm) Distance of T (Rt)-Pn 104.88±4.79 104.86±4.26 104.62±4.52 0.931
 Length from T to Ls (mm) Distance of T (Rt)-Ls 101.79±5.42 102.49±4.66 102.89±4.92 0.471
 Length from T to Me′ (mm) Distance of T (Rt)-Me′ 111.85±7.29 112.76±5.36 113.21±4.52 0.393
 N′-T-Pn angle (°) Angle of [N′-T (Rt)-Pn] 24.18±1.80 24.06±1.77 24.26±1.96 0.830
 Pn-T-Ls angle (°) Angle of [Pn-T (Rt)-Ls] 15.26±1.14 16.09±1.44 16.48±1.62 0.000*
 Ls-T-Me′ angle (°) Angle of [Ls-T (Rt)-Me′] 29.49±2.48 29.38±2.18 29.46±2.30 0.966
 Nasofrontal angle (°) Angle of (G′-N′-Pn) 145.61±5.02 146.55±4.78 148.07±4.88 0.015*
 Nasofacial angle (°) Angle of [(G′-Pg′)-(N′-Pn)] 29.12±2.95 28.42±2.96 27.77±2.87 0.034*
 Nasomental angle (°) Angle of (N′-Pn-Pg′) 135.04±4.54 136.65±4.87 137.47±4.50 0.015*
 Nasolabial angle (°) Angle of (Pn-Sn-Ls) 108.32±8.79 109.18±7.98 108.32±8.39 0.813
 Labiomental angle (°) Angle of (Li-B′-Pg′) 143.58±10.48 144.65±9.84 147.18±8.74 0.080*

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. See Fig. 1 for abbreviations. Rt: right, Lt: left. *Statistically significant in the one-way ANOVA (p<0.05).

Volume measures

Total facial volume showed no significant difference among the groups (Fig. 2A). However, the younger group had a greater upper-facial volume than the middle or older group. No significant difference was found in the mid- and lower-facial volume among the groups.

Fig. 2. Results of three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis for Korean female population. (A) volume measures, (B) upper-facial height, (C) length measures of mid-face, (D) angle measures of mid-face, (E) length measures of lower-face, (F) angle measures of lower-face, (G) length measures at lateral view, and (H) angle measures at lateral view. T: tragion, N': nasion, Pn: pronasale, Ls: labial superius, Me': menton. *Statistically significant in the post hoc test with the Bonferroni correction (p<0.05).

Fig. 2

Frontal view measures

Total facial height showed no significant difference between the age-groups. The vertical ratio was 0.76:1:0.89 in the younger group, 0.73:1:0.92 in the middle group, and 0.72:1:0.92 in the older group.

Frontal view measures of the upper-face

The older group had shorter upper-facial height compared with the younger group (Fig. 2B).

Frontal view measures of the mid-face

Mid-facial height showed no significant difference among the groups (Fig. 2C). Palpebral fissure width and height were smaller in the older group than in the younger or middle group. Intercanthal width was smaller in the middle group than in the younger or older group. No significant difference was shown in the interpupillary width among the groups. Binocular width was shorter in the older group than in the younger or middle group. The older group had longer upper eyelid height compared with the younger or middle group. Nasal width was greater in the older group than in the other groups, while there was no significant difference in nasal height. The horizontal ratio was 0.73:1:0.73 in the younger group; 0.76:1:0.75 in the middle group, and 0.66:1:0.66 in the older group. For the angle measure, no significant difference was found in the slant of palpebral fissure among the groups (Fig. 2D).

Frontal view measures of the lower-face

Lower-facial height was greater in the middle and older group compared with the younger group (Fig. 2E). The height and width of philtrum were significantly increased in the older groups compared with the middle or younger group. Upper lip height was greater in the middle and older group than in the younger group, while upper vermilion height showed no significant difference among the groups. Lower lip height was not different among the groups, but the older group had a shorter lower vermilion height than the younger or middle group. The older group had greater mouth width and lower vermilion angle compared with the younger or middle group (Fig. 2F). No significant difference was observed in the angle of upper vermilion and Cupid's bow among the three groups.

Lateral view measures

In terms of the measurement from lateral view, statistical significance was not observed in the lengths from T to N', T to Pn, T to Ls, and T to Me' among the three groups (Fig. 2G). For the angle measures, the younger group had a smaller angle of Pn-T-Ls compared with the middle or older group (Fig. 2H). In contrast, the angle of N'-T-Pn and Ls-T-Me' was not significantly different between the age-groups. The older group had greater nasofrontal, nasomental, and labiomental angles, but smaller nasofacial angle than the younger group. No significant difference was found in the nasolabial angle among the three groups.

DISCUSSION

Highly accurate dimension measuring tools are required in facial anthropometry15. Direct anthropometry is considered as the standard technique and widely used for the study of facial dimensions16. Although this technique is considered relatively reliable and inexpensive, it is time-consuming, impossible to archive, and requires patients to remain still during the procedure17. Cephalometry, which measures the facial dimensions by radiography, is essential in planning oral and maxillofacial surgeries. However, it does not reflect soft tissue structures accurately which determines postoperative patient's satisfaction18,19. Two-dimensional photogrammetry based on digital cameras has been utilized as an alternative. It has the advantages of rapid acquisition, archival capabilities, and low cost16. However, this has the limitation of measurement errors with respect to the 2D representations of 3D surfaces20.

3D photogrammetry is a non-invasive anthropometric tool to quantitatively measure linear distances, angles, and volumes of the facial soft tissue from reconstructed 3D facial images. Currently, 3D photogrammetry is widely accepted as a reliable and convenient method for facial anthropometry21. When compared with direct anthropometry using a digital caliper, it allows for a greater level of precision, with a mean difference of less than 1 mm17,22. In a systematic review evaluating the various anthropometric methods for assessing facial dimensions in children, 3D photogrammetry was highly recommended due to the high correlation with direct anthropometry, millisecond quick capture of high-resolution image, archival capabilities for subsequent morphometric studies, and no exposure to ionizing radiation16,23.

In the present study, we performed anthropometric assessments of the faces of Korean females in three age-groups to identify ethnicity-specific and age-related facial characteristics. The results indicated that older Korean females had less volume and shorter upper-face height compared with younger Korean females. Aging results in the loss of subcutaneous fullness of the forehead, eyebrow, and temple due to lipoatrophy, accentuating the underlying anatomic structures24,25. Inferior migration of temporal fat compartments and inferior volume shift within the compartment could further lead to the loss of upper-facial volume26. We also found lengthened lower-facial height in older subjects. It was consistent with the 10-year longitudinal study by Akgül and Toygar27, which revealed increased lower-facial height in Turkish females in the third decade of life. They also found downward displacement of pogonion and menton with aging in female subjects27. The slight continuous eruption of teeth that takes place even after the occlusion during post-adolescence has been suggested as the reason for lower-facial height lengthening28.

The characteristic periorbital features of older Korean females are shorter palpebral fissure height, narrower palpebral fissure width, longer eyelid height, shorter binocular width, and smaller palpebral fissure slant. These are consistent with the result by Direk et al.29, they reported shorter palpebral fissure height, narrower palpebral fissure width, and shorter binocular width in Turkish females aged over 60 years compared with younger (aged 20~44 years) or middle-aged (45~59 years) females. Age-dependent shortening of palpebral fissure width was also demonstrated in the Dutch population30. Between the ages of 45 and 85 years, the palpebral fissure width is gradually shortened by approximately 2.5 mm30. Morphological changes in the periorbital bony structures have been reported to cause changes in the overlying soft tissue envelope appearance10. Widening of the superomedial and inferolateral orbital rim leads to the rolling of soft tissues—especially the superior orbital fat pads—onto the orbital aperture, resulting in the ptosis of lateral upper eyelid and lateral orbital hooding31,32. Another explanation for the shortening of palpebral fissure width and height is progressive laxity of the medial and lateral canthal structures30.

Longer nasal width is demonstrated in older Korean females when compared with younger counterparts. Aging causes upper maxillary resorption and remodeling of the pyriform aperture28,29. As a result, posterior displacement of pyriform aperture occurs33,34. This bony change affects the overlying soft tissue, the alar base, and is thought to contribute to the wider nose in the elderly24.

Aging of the perioral region is a common complaint of patients seeking facial rejuvenation35. Our result indicated that lower-facial characteristics of older Korean females are attributable to the elongation of philtrum height, philtrum width, upper lip height, and mouth width, while shortening of lower vermilion height during the aging process. Upper vermilion height was not significantly different with age. These results are consistent with the previous study by Kim et al.11, analyzing the age-related perioral morphological changes in Korean women. They reported that philtrum height and mouth width increased with age while lower vermilion height decreased. Upper vermilion height remained unchanged with age. Significant increase in the height of upper lip and philtrum with age was also found in Caucasians36. Age-dependent elongation of mouth width and philtrum width, and shortening of lower vermilion height was also demonstrated in Italian female adults6. Iblher et al.37 demonstrated that aging causes redistribution of the lip due to thinning of the orbicularis oris muscle, thinning of the cutis, and degeneration of the elastic and collagen fibers. Thinning of the lip without volume loss results in the elongation of the upper lip37. Loss of structural support induces ptosis of the lip and loss of its natural turned-up pout37,38.

The present study revealed the changes in facial morphology according to aging in Koreans through non-invasive method. Compared to previous studies, this study presented a reliable method to measure comprehensive changes in facial morphology, while providing detailed information divided according to age and location.

In conclusion, this present study provided detailed information on the age-related facial dimensions in healthy Korean female adults via 3D photogrammetric analysis. The characteristic features of older Korean females are as follows: loss of upper-facial volume, shortened upper-facial height, narrowed palpebral fissure with elongated upper eyelid height, widened nose, elongated lower-facial height, elongated and widened philtrum, shortened lower vermilion height, widened mouth width, smaller lower vermilion angle, greater angles of nasofrontal, nasomental and labiomental angle, and smaller nasofacial angle.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have nothing to disclose.

FUNDING SOURCE: None.

DATA SHARING STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Zimbler MS, Kokoska MS, Thomas JR. Anatomy and pathophysiology of facial aging. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001;9:179–187. vii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim SC, Kim HB, Jeong WS, Koh KS, Huh CH, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of facial proportions between beauty pageant contestants and ordinary young women of Korean ethnicity: a three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42:748–758. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Othman SA, Majawit LP, Wan Hassan WN, Wey MC, Mohd Razi R. Anthropometric study of three-dimensional facial morphology in Malay adults. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dong Y, Zhao Y, Bai S, Wu G, Zhou L, Wang B. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:1195–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov A, Ovsenik M, Tawfik W, Borbely P, et al. Use of 3-dimensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S56.e1–S56.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.022. discussion S56-S57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, Dolci C, De Menezes M, Ferrario VF. Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;200:182.e1–182.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhuang Z, Landsittel D, Benson S, Roberge R, Shaffer R. Facial anthropometric differences among gender, ethnicity, and age groups. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010;54:391–402. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang YH, Wang B, Ding Y, Shi YW, Wang XG. Facial anthropometric proportion of Chinese Han nationality. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:1601–1604. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD, Schaefer O, Guentsch A, Gomez Dammeier M, et al. Perioral aging--an anthropometric appraisal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:e312–e317. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kahn DM, Shaw RB. Overview of current thoughts on facial volume and aging. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26:350–355. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim H, Lee M, Park SY, Kim YM, Han J, Kim E. Age-related changes in lip morphological and physiological characteristics in Korean women. Skin Res Technol. 2019;25:277–282. doi: 10.1111/srt.12644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim SH, Shin HS. Three-dimensional analysis of the correlation between soft tissue and bone of the lower face using three-dimensional facial laser scan. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:2048–2054. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baik HS, Jeon JM, Lee HJ. Facial soft-tissue analysis of Korean adults with normal occlusion using a 3-dimensional laser scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:759–766. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–163. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Farkas LG, Deutsch CK. Anthropometric determination of craniofacial morphology. Am J Med Genet. 1996;65:1–4. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320650102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brons S, van Beusichem ME, Bronkhorst EM, Draaisma J, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ, et al. Methods to quantify soft-tissue based facial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT, DeLeon VB, Richtsmeier JT. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;138A:247–253. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oh J, Han JJ, Ryu SY, Oh HK, Kook MS, Jung S, et al. Clinical and cephalometric analysis of facial soft tissue. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:e431–e438. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:648–657. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90225-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG. Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1819–1825. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199906000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:341–352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim SH, Jung WY, Seo YJ, Kim KA, Park KH, Park YG. Accuracy and precision of integumental linear dimensions in a three-dimensional facial imaging system. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45:105–112. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, Hunt AT, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB, et al. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45:232–239. doi: 10.1597/06-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(1S):S4–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wysong A, Joseph T, Kim D, Tang JY, Gladstone HB. Quantifying soft tissue loss in facial aging: a study in women using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1895–1902. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gierloff M, Stöhring C, Buder T, Gassling V, Açil Y, Wiltfang J. Aging changes of the midfacial fat compartments: a computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:263–273. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182362b96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Akgül AA, Toygar TU. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:512–522. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.128861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Forsberg CM, Eliasson S, Westergren H. Face height and tooth eruption in adults--a 20-year follow-up investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:249–254. doi: 10.1093/ejo/13.4.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Direk FK, Deniz M, Uslu AI, Doğru S. Anthropometric analysis of orbital region and age-related changes in adult women. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:1579–1582. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.van den Bosch WA, Leenders I, Mulder P. Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:347–352. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pessa JE, Chen Y. Curve analysis of the aging orbital aperture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:751–755. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00051. discussion 756-760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karunanayake M, To F, Efanov JI, Doumit G. Analysis of craniofacial remodeling in the aging midface using reconstructed three-dimensional models in paired individuals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:448e–454e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pessa JE, Peterson ML, Thompson JW, Cohran CS, Garza JR. Pyriform augmentation as an ancillary procedure in facial rejuvenation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:683–686. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haffner CL, Pessa JE, Zadoo VP, Garza JR. A technique for three-dimensional cephalometric analysis as an aid in evaluating changes in the craniofacial skeleton. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:345–348. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0345:ATFTDC>2.3.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sullivan PK, Hoy EA, Mehan V, Singer DP. An anatomical evaluation and surgical approach to the perioral mound in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1333–1340. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea4abd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Iblher N, Kloepper J, Penna V, Bartholomae JP, Stark GB. Changes in the aging upper lip--a photomorphometric and MRI-based study (on a quest to find the right rejuvenation approach) J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1170–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iblher N, Stark GB, Penna V. The aging perioral region--do we really know what is happening? J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16:581–585. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ezure T, Hosoi J, Amano S, Tsuchiya T. Sagging of the cheek is related to skin elasticity, fat mass and mimetic muscle function. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15:299–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Annals of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Korean Dermatological Association and Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology

RESOURCES