Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0247129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247129

Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

Nicholas Gray, Dominic Calleja, Alexander Wimbush, Enrique Miralles-Dolz, Ander Gray, Marco De Angelis, Elfriede Derrer-Merk, Bright Uchenna Oparaji, Vladimir Stepanov, Louis Clearkin, Scott Ferson
PMCID: PMC7875417  PMID: 33566807

The title of this article is incorrect. The correct title is: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. The correct citation is: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775

Reference

  • 1.Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is “no test is better than a bad test”? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775 10.1371/journal.pone.0240775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES