Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2021 Jan 25;6(5):3675–3680. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05192

Novel Method for the Quantitative Analysis of Protease Activity: The Casein Plate Method and Its Applications

Xin Zhang †,, Yao Shuai †,§, Han Tao ‡,§, Cuiqin Li †,∥,*, Laping He †,§,*
PMCID: PMC7876679  PMID: 33585747

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c05192_0005.jpg

No simple methods are used for the quantitative analysis of the protease activity in colored food up till now. Thus, this study aims to establish a new and simple method for the quantitative detection of protease activity, especially in colored food. The detection accuracy, detection limit, and repeatability of the casein plate method were analyzed. Then, the application of the casein plate method in sample detection and recovery was further evaluated. The results showed that the casein plate method for the quantitative detection of protease activity has high accuracy, high precision, and low detection limit. The recoveries of eight kinds of colored samples were in the range of 92.26–97.84%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was in the range of 3.56–10.88%. The results of the casein plate method exhibited high accuracy. This indicated that the method was suitable for the detection of colored samples. The casein plate method for the quantitative detection of protease activity is simple. The newly constructed casein plate method has broad potential application value in food industry, especially for the detection of dark food.

1. Introduction

Proteinase is a kind of enzyme for protein hydrolysis. It is a group of large and complex enzymes with highly specific protein hydrolysis. It features high specificity to biological molecules and has wide application value in the fields of food, medicine, and detergents.1 They are involved in the selective proteolysis of various specific substrates, embryonic development, bone and organ tissue repair, neuron growth, immune and inflammatory cell regulation, angiogenesis and apoptosis, and other biological processes.25

The analysis of protease activity is an important step in the research and application of protease6 development and validation of a simple titration method for studying the heat-activated; endogenous protease in arrow tooth flounder fillet mince is described. Protease activity has been detected by the fluorescence method,7,8 but detection based on calorimetry,9 mass spectrometry (MS),10 immunoassay,11 electrophoresis,12,13 amperometry,14 optics,15,16 and so on.

Fluorescence-conjugated polyelectrolytes, suspended ionic sulfonates, and carboxyl groups are used to detect protease activity.7 The fluorescence method exhibits an obvious mechanism and entails a simple operation. However, given the need for special instruments, certain operational requirements must be met by experimenters; hence, this method is not commonly employed. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry has the advantages of simplicity, high throughput, and sensitivity and thus possesses great application potential. However, this method is not commonly applied because of its high instrument and operational requirements. D1 protease activity has been determined by capillary zone electrophoresis,12 but this method cannot detect the activities of other proteases. Kilian et al.17 proposed an organic derivatization method using silicon-based nanoporous photonic crystals to immobilize polypeptides for the detection of proteases in solutions. The minimum detection concentration of this method is 3.7 × 10–10 mol·L–1. Although this method has a low detection limit and yields accurate detection results, it requires specific nanomaterials, which are usually expensive; hence, it is also not commonly used.

Mahmoud et al.18 proposed a method for the electrochemical detection of human immunodeficiency virus type I protease by surface modification with ferrocene (Fc) peptide with a detection limit of 8 × 10–11 mol·L–1. This method also has a low detection limit and achieves accurate detection but requires electrodes, nanomaterials, and specific electrochemical workstations. It also entails high operational requirements from the experimenters. Serim et al.19 described the use of probe technology to detect protease activity. At present, the colorimetric method is commonly used to detect protease activity. Common protease activities are quantitatively expressed by detecting either the decrease in substrate protein concentration or the increase in product-free amino acid or polypeptide concentration before and after enzymatic hydrolysis. Ultraviolet spectrophotometer and biuret reagent are used in the former, while ninhydrin colorimetry, trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid, and Folin-phenol reagent are used in the latter. In the determination of protease activity using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer,20 the protease hydrolyzes the casein substrate at a certain temperature and pH, the enzyme reaction is terminated by the added trichloroacetic acid, and the unhydrolyzed casein is precipitated. The activity of the casein can be determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. However, this method suffers from disadvantages such as unsuitability for colored sample detection, difficulty of operation, and proneness to errors.

The Coomassie Brilliant Blue method21 is also used to detect protease activity. In this method, the Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye binds to the protein under acidic conditions. The dye binds to basic amino acids (especially arginine) and aromatic amino acid residues in protein so that the maximum absorption peak of the dye increases from 465 to 595 nm and the color of the solution changes from brown to black. Absorption is determined at 595 nm. This method is fast, simple, stable, and highly sensitive, but its linear relationship becomes increasingly deviated with the increase in protein content. The reaction can be disturbed by a strong alkaline buffer, sodium dodecyl sulfate, and other substances.22 In the ninhydrin chromogenic method,2325 protease activity can be determined by adding protease to the solution containing protease to decompose for a period of time; the content of the produced α-amino acid is then determined. However, the results of this method are quite erroneous because of the slow reaction, side reactions, unstable hydrolysis, oxidation and photolysis, and color interference.26

However, there is no simple method suitable for detecting protease activity in dark samples. This is mainly because the commonly used spectrophotometry is seriously disturbed by color.

When the protease activity in real samples is measured, many samples are dark in color, and the extracted enzyme solution is even darker in color. For example, when a sample’s color is extremely dark, it presents a blue-black color after a reaction. For light-colored samples, the complete color of the reaction is dark blue or light blue. Hence, a new method is needed to eliminate the interference of color and accurately determine the enzyme activity of dark samples. The issue is whether a simple way may be used to achieve high accuracy and precise analysis that is unaffected by the sample color?

In the present work, we aimed to establish a new and simple method for the quantitative detection of protease activity, especially in colored samples. Commercial trypsin was diluted and cultured in different solutions. The measured results were used as standard curves. The activity of the samples was calculated according to the size of the hydrolysis circle of the samples. The feasibility of using the casein plate method in the quantitative analysis of protease activity was discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Standard Curve of Casein Plate Method and Limit of Detection (LOD)

The relation between the area of the hydrolysis circle and the activity of commercial trypsin is shown in Figure 1. The regression equation was

2.1. 1

R2 = 0.9986, Sa (standard deviation of the response) = 2.299, in which X is the activity of commercial trypsin (U·mL–1) and Y is the area of the hydrolysis circle (mm2). It indicated a good linear relationship between the area of the hydrolysis zone and the protease activity in a wide range.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Standard curve for the determination of enzyme activity by the casein plate method.

Moreover, according to eq 1, LOD27 could be obtained as follows: LOD = 3Sa/b = 3.989 (U·mL–1), where b is the slope of the calibration curve (eq 1). Jannat et al.28 reported a semiquantitative liquid crystal (LC)-based method for the detection of protease with a detection limit of 10 ng·mL–1 protease (active 7.23 U·mg–1 protease) or 6.5 μg·mL–1 peptide fragment. However, the test results may be affected by undigested casein or residual protease unless the peptide fragment is analyzed by LC. All casein and protease molecules were precipitated by TCA. Mahmoud used the electrochemical method to detect human immunodeficiency virus type I protease, and the detection limit was 8 × 10–11 mol·L–1. The electrochemical method uses an electrochemical workstation to detect protease. The instrument has high precision, low detection limit, and accurate detection results. However, specific and expensive instruments are needed for protease detection. Ingram et al.29 constructed a SERRS-based enzyme probe to detect protease activity with a detection limit of 50 ng·mL–1, which is considerably lower than that of the Folin–Ciocalteu method or the casein plate method. However, this method requires an enzyme probe. Compared with the casein plate method, it has a higher cost, more complex operation, and higher requirements for operators and instruments. Although the detection limit of the casein plate method is lower than that of the electrochemical and enzyme probe methods, it can meet the general detection accuracy, and the operation is simple and easy.

2.2. Precision

Samples (10 μL, 25, and 50 U·mL–1) were injected into the casein plate. After 10 min of static incubation, the samples were cultured in an incubator at 37 °C for 18 h. The area of the hydrolysis circle was calculated to measure the enzymatic activity. The results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Measurement Results and Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) Values of Low and High Concentrationsa.

  low concentration (25 U·mL–1)
high concentration (50 U·mL–1)
sequence number measurement results RSD (%) measurement results RSD (%)
1 24.449 ± 0.110 0.45 47.917 ± 0.996 2.08
2 26.348 ± 0.793 3.01 47.389 ± 1.353 2.85
3 26.0295 ± 1.015 3.90 46.925 ± 0.806 1.72
4 25.316 ± 1.116 4.41 46.432 ± 0.567 1.22
5 25.238 ± 1.227 4.86 48.015 ± 0.621 1.29
6 24.686 ± 0.885 3.58 47.917 ± 0.996 2.08
a

RSD indicates relative standard deviation.

The precision results of this method are shown in Table 1. The RSD ranged from 0.45 to 4.86% at low concentration and from 1.22 to 2.85% at high concentration. Wu et al.30 used high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) detection to determine the content of phthalate esters and obtained an RSD range of 3.9–5.7%. The RSD of the casein plate method was 0.45–4.86%, which was similar to HPLC. This finding was mainly due to the fact that the hydrolysis circle of the casein plate was somewhat irregular, resulting in some operational errors in manual measurement. However, the RSD values measured via the casein plate method were all less than 5%, which indicated a relatively good precision.

2.3. Repeatability

Repeated experiments were carried out at a moderate concentration (25 U·mL–1). The results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Repeated Experimental Resultsa.

sequence number enzyme activity (U·mL–1) standard deviation RSD (%)
1 23.752 24.216 25.788 1.067 4.34
2 22.985 24.527 23.751 0.771 3.25
3 22.985 24.527 24.216 0.816 3.41
4 24.997 24.216 25.345 0.578 2.33
5 24.997 24.061 26.909 1.452 5.73
6 26.909 25.721 25.368 0.807 3.10
a

RSD indicates relative standard deviation. The casein plate method was employed to determine the enzyme activity of a 25 U·mL–1 protease solution. The results showed that the RSD was between 2.33 and 5.73%, which is less than 10%, which indicated good accuracy. This method has good repeatability and small error, indicating accurate and reliable results.

2.4. Detection of Protease Activity in a Colorless Sample

The casein plate hydrolyzed by the commercial trypsin solution (colorless sample) is shown in Figure 2a,b. The casein plate that reacted with the trypsin solution clearly exhibited a hydrolysis circle with a smooth and clear outline, while the casein plate that was hydrolyzed by sterile water had no hydrolysis circle, indicating the absence of protease activity. The smooth edge of the hydrolysis circle can effectively reduce measurement error and obtain accurate measurement results.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Detection of protease activity in colorless samples. (a) Commercial trypsin hydrolysis circle by casein plate. (b) Aseptic water hydrolysis by casein plate.

The commercial protease solution of 25 U·mL–1 concentration was determined by the casein plate method. The enzymatic activity of the commercial protease solution by the casein plate method was 24.53 ± 0.66 U·mL–1, with a RSD of 2.7%. Thus, the casein plate method demonstrates good credibility for colorless samples.

2.5. Detection of Protease Activity in Colored Samples

After 24 h of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) extraction, the samples were filtered using a slow qualitative filter paper. The filtrate was centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 rpm to precipitate the bacteria and obtain a crude enzyme solution. The crude enzyme solution (10 μL) was injected into a perforated casein plate. After 10 min of standing, the casein plate was cultured in an incubator at 37 °C for 18 h. The diameter of the hydrolysis circle was measured, and its enzyme activity was calculated.

The casein plate of the soy sauce sample is shown in Figure 3. It shows that no hydrolysis circle is formed in Figure 3a, indicating that the sample has no protease activity and that the substrate casein cannot be hydrolyzed. Figure 3b shows that the sample hydrolyzed a certain amount of substrate casein at a certain range; hence, an obvious hydrolysis circle is formed. The area of the hydrolysis circle and the protease activity are calculated according to the standard curve of commercial trypsin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Detection of protease activity in colored samples. (a) Hydrolysis diagram of soy sauce samples on casein plate (no enzyme activity). (b) Hydrolysis diagram of soy sauce samples on casein plate. (c) Detection of colored samples.

The activity of protease was determined by the casein plate method, the results are shown in Figure 3c. The protease activity of eight kinds of colored foods extracts was determined by the casein plate method. The relative standard deviation of the results was within 4.265–10.35%, which indicated that the error was small and the results were accurate and reliable.

2.6. Analysis of Recovery Rates by Standard Addition to Colored Sample

The recoveries of eight kinds of colored foods by the casein plate method is shown in Table 3. The recovery of the casein plate assay ranged from 92.26 to 97.84%, and the relative standard deviation ranged from 3.56 to 10.88%. According to the Chinese national standard GB/T 2704–2008 “Laboratory quality control specification-physical and chemical inspection of food,” when the content of crude components is less than 0.1 mg·kg–1, the recovery rate of the added standard should be between 60 and 120% and that of the casein plate method is 92.26–97.84%. In this range, the casein plate method determines the protease activity more accurately. So, the casein plate method is especially suitable for measuring the activity of protease in the colored samples.

Table 3. Sample Recovery by the Standard Additiona.

detection method sample scalar addition (U·mL–1) sample value (U·mL–1) detection value (U·mL–1) rate of recovery (%) RSD (%)
casein plate method red pitaya fruit 10 26.45 ± 2.36 36.23 ± 1.688 97.84 4.66
soy sauce 10 55.49 ± 2.36 64.71 ± 4.09 92.26 6.32
dried mulberry 10 7.30 ± 0.54 16.95 ± 1.44 96.47 8.48
purple cabbage 10 8.23 ± 0.85 17.86 ± 0.70 96.37 3.91
amaranthus tricolor 10 14.92 ± 0.76 24.55 ± 2.67 96.25 10.88
black rice 10 11.53 ± 0.46 21.25 ± 1.07 97.2 5.04
red rice 10 13.41 ± 0.67 23.02 ± 0.82 96.1 3.56
pineapple 10 21.26 ± 1.22 30.92 ± 2.65 96.6 8.57
a

RSD indicates relative standard deviation.

The casein plate method mainly solves the problem of interference of the dark-colored sample extract in the common methods for detecting protease activity. Moreover, the casein plate method is simple, easy to operate, and appears obvious hydrolysis ring. It can effectively avoid errors caused by color. Therefore, the casein plate method is especially suitable for the detection of protease activity in colored food.

3. Conclusions

We constructed a novel and simple method for the accurate and precise quantitative analysis of the protease activity-casein plate method. The precision experiment showed that the RSD of the casein plate method was between 1.22 and 8.07%, which indicated good precision. Its detection limit was 3.989 U·mL–1, and its repeatability RSD was 2.1–5.73%; both values indicated good repeatability. The casein plate assay is suitable for the detection of protease activity in colorless samples (such as commercial trypsin solution). Moreover, the casein plate method for evaluating the protease activity of eight colored samples exhibited a low RSD. The recoveries of eight colored samples determined by the casein plate method ranged from 92.26 to 97.84%, and the results were accurate. The advantage of the casein plate method is that it can effectively avoid errors caused by deep-colored samples. It has no requirement for sample color, especially for dark samples, such as red pitaya. It is simple to operate and can be widely used. It can also be effectively applied to determine the enzymatic activity of soy sauce, tea, and other products with darker colors.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Trypsin (25 000 U·g–1) was purchased from Biofroxx Co., Ltd., Germany. Analytically pure glucose, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium carbonate, potassium biphosphate, trichloroacetic acid, and magnesium sulfate were purchased from Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd. of the National Pharmaceutical Group. All other chemicals used in this work were of analytical grade and commercially available. Red heart pitaya, amaranth, and blueberry were purchased from Wal-Mart supermarket in Huaxi district of Guiyang city; soy sauce was obtained from a local soy sauce manufacturer and not sterilized.

4.2. Preparation of Casein Plate

The casein plate medium contained casein 10 g·L–1, glucose 1 g·L–1, yeast extract 1 g·L–1, K2HPO4 1 g·L–1, KH2PO4 0.5 g·L–1, magnesium sulfate 0.1 g·L–1, and agar 20 g·L–1. Then, 20 mL of the mixture was injected into a plate with a diameter of 9 mm. To ensure the thickness uniformity of the plate, we use the plates of the same size (90 mm), add the same amount of casein to the plates, and put the plates flat.

4.3. Casein Plate Method for a Quantitative Analysis of Protease Activity and Limit of Detection (LOD)

Protease can hydrolyze the casein plate to form an observable hydrolysis circle. The prepared casein plate was drilled with a 10 mL gun head (three parallel holes in one plate), and 10 μL of enzyme solution was injected into the hole. After 10 min, the casein plate was placed in an incubator at 37 °C for 18 h. The diameter of the hydrolysis ring was measured, and the area of the dissolution ring was calculated. Commercial trypsin was diluted to prepare the solution for the required enzyme activity, injected into the hole in the casein plate, and then cultured. The standard curve of commercial trypsin was plotted with the area of the dissolving circle as the ordinate (Y, mm2) and with the activity of commercial trypsin as the abscissa (X, U·mL–1). Then, the linear regression equation for Y and X could be obtained as follows:

4.3. 2

where b is the slope of the calibration curve. Also, LOD can be detected27 according eq 3

4.3. 3

where Sa is the standard deviation of the response Y and b is the slope of the calibration curve (eq 2). Sample enzymatic activity was determined according to the standard curve. Here, why do we choose the incubation time of 18 h? Our preliminary experiments (data not shown) indicated that when the incubation time of the casein plate is less than 18 h, the hydrolysis circle of samples with low enzyme activity is not obvious, and the error of detecting enzyme activity is large. However, if the time is too long, the rate of change of the hydrolysis circle will decrease rapidly. Therefore, considering the detection effect and saving time, the culture time selected by this method is 18 h.

4.4. Precision Experiment

Eighteen copies of 0.100 g of commercial trypsin were dissolved in sterile water at a constant volume of 10 mL. A 250 U·mL–1 trypsin solution was prepared and diluted into 25 and 50 U·mL–1 solutions. Each casein plate was injected with 10 μL of enzyme solution and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h after 10 min of standing. The diameter of the hydrolysis circle was measured, and the enzyme activity and the relative standard deviation (RSD) values were calculated.

4.5. Determination of Enzyme Activity in Colorless Sample

The commercial trypsin (0.100 g) was accurately weighed and dissolved in sterile water to a constant volume of 10 mL to prepare a 250 U·mL–1 trypsin solution. The casein plate method was used for the determination.

4.6. Determination of Enzyme Activity in Colored Samples

Red pitaya fruit, soy sauce, dried mulberry, purple cabbage, amaranthus tricolor, red rice, black rice, and pineapple (both 1 g) were extracted with 10 mL of PBS buffer for 24 h. After that, the extraction solution was filtered with a 0.45 μm porous membrane for the preparation of the enzyme solution. The casein plate was perforated, and 10 μL of the enzyme solution was injected into the hole. After 10 min of standing, the casein plate was cultured at 37 °C for 18 h. The diameter of the hydrolysis ring was measured, and the enzyme activity and the RSD values were calculated.

Then, the extract of colored foods was added with some amount of 10 U·mL–1 of commercial trypsin solution. The mixed liquid (10 μL) was injected into the casein plate pore and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Then, the enzyme activity and recovery rate were measured.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in three replicates, and the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and their RSD values were calculated.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Key Agricultural Project of Guizhou Province (QKHZC-[2019]2382 and QKHZC-[2016]2580), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870002 and 31660010), the Guizhou Province Science and Technology Plan Project (Qiankehe talents project [2018]5781, [2017]5788-11, and [2017]5788), and the Research Project of Guizhou University ((2019)33).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Gurumallesh P.; Alagu K.; Ramakrishnan B.; Muthusamy S. A Systematic Reconsideration on Proteases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 254–267. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ling L.; Xiao C.; Wang S.; Guo L.; Guo X. A Pyrene Linked Peptide Probe for Quantitative Analysis of Protease Activity via MALDI-TOF-MS. Talanta 2019, 200, 236–241. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.03.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brindisi J. A.; Parker J. D.; Turner L. G.; Larick D. K. Chemical Profiles of Hydrolyzed Milk Samples after Treatment with Commercial Enzymes. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 1100–1107. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb16088.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Merheb-Dini C.; Chaves K. S.; Gomes E.; da Silva R.; Gigante M. L. Coalho Cheese Made with Protease from Thermomucor Indicae-Seudaticae N31: Technological Potential of the New Coagulant for the Production of High-Cooked Cheese. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C563–C568. 10.1111/1750-3841.13217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim M. J.; Lim E. S.; Kim J. S. Enzymatic Inactivation of Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Bacteria in Biofilms in Combination with Chlorine. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 605–614. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilson D. D.; Choudhury G. S. Development and Validation of a Modified pH-Stat Method to Study Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomias) Protease. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2003, 12, 65–83. 10.1300/J030v12n01_05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pinto M. R.; Schanze K. S. Amplified Fluorescence Sensing of Protease Activity with Conjugated Polyelectrolytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 7505–7510. 10.1073/pnas.0402280101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peng Y. H.; Chen S. Y.; Ji H. W.; Liu S. C. Localization of Trypsin-Like Protease in Postmortem Tissue of White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and Its Effect in Muscle Softening. Food Chem. 2019, 290, 277–285. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Luo Q.; Chen D.; Boom R. M.; Janssen A. E. M. Revisiting the Enzymatic Kinetics of Pepsin Using Isothermal Titration Calorimetry. Food Chem. 2018, 268, 94–100. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu J. J.; Liu F.; Feng N.; Ju H. X. Peptide Codes for Multiple Protease Activity Assay via High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Quantitation. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2016, 30, 196–201. 10.1002/rcm.7631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Quinn C. P.; Semenova V. A.; Elie C. M.; Sandra R. S.; Carolyn G.; Han L.; Karen S.; Evelene S. C.; Schmidt D. S.; Elizabeth M.; et al. Specific, Sensitive, and Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Human Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Anthrax Toxin Protective Antigen. Emerging Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 1103–1110. 10.3201/eid0810.020380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Rourke M. B.; Djordjevic S. P.; Padula M. P. The Quest for Improved Reproducibility in MALDI Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2018, 37, 217–228. 10.1002/mas.21515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kolesnikov A. V.; Kozyr A. V.; Ryabko A. K.; Shemyakin I. G. Ultrasensitive Detection of Protease Activity of Anthrax and Botulinum Toxins by a New PCR-Based Assay. Pathog. Dis. 2015, 74, ftv112 10.1093/femspd/ftv112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng M.; Zhou J.; Zhou X.; Xing D. Peptide Cleavage Induced Assembly Enables Highly Sensitive Electrochemiluminescence Setection of Protease Activity. Sens. Actuators, B 2018, 262, 516–521. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu J.; Han B.; Deng S.; Sun S.; Chen J. Changes in Proteases and Chemical Compounds in the Exterior and Interior of Sufu, a Chinese Fermented Soybean Food, During Manufacture. Lwt 2018, 87, 210–216. 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cupp-Enyard C. Sigma’s Non-Specific Protease Activity Assay - Casein as a Substrate. J. Visualized Exp. 2008, 19, e899 10.3791/899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kilian K. A.; Böcking T.; Gaus K.; Gal M.; Gooding J. J. Peptide-Modified Optical Filters for Detecting Protease Activity. ACS Nano 2007, 1, 355–361. 10.1021/nn700141n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahmoud K. A.; Hrapovic S.; Luong J. H. T. Picomolar Detection of Protease Using Peptide/Single Walled Carbon Nanotube/Gold Nanoparticle-Modified Electrode. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 1051–1057. 10.1021/nn8000774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Serim S.; Haedke U.; Verhelst S. H. L. Activity-Based Probes for the Study of Proteases: Recent Advances and Developments. ChemMedChem 2012, 7, 1146–1159. 10.1002/cmdc.201200057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yin L.-J.; Hsu T.-H.; Jiang S.-T. Characterization of Acidic Protease from Aspergillus Niger BCRC 32720. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 662–666. 10.1021/jf3041726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bickerstaff G. F.; Zhou H. Protease Activity and Autodigestion (autolysis) Assays Using Coomassie Blue Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 210, 155–158. 10.1006/abio.1993.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zuo S. S.; Lundahl P. A micro-Bradford Membrane Protein Assay. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 284, 162–164. 10.1006/abio.2000.4676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rawski R. I.; Sanecki P. T.; Dzugan M.; Kijowska K. The Evidence of Proteases in Sprouted Seeds and Their Application for Animal Protein Digestion. Chem. Pap. 2018, 72, 1213–1221. 10.1007/s11696-017-0341-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ganeshpurkar A.; Kumar D.; Singh S. K. Design, Synthesis and Collagenase Inhibitory Activity of Some Novel Phenylglycine Derivatives as Metalloproteinase Inhibitors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 1491–1500. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang Y. F.; Fu Y.; Zhou S. F.; Kang L. X.; Li C. Z. A Straightforward Ninhydrin-Based Method for Collagenase Activity and Inhibitor Screening of Collagenase Using Spectrophotometry. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 437, 46–48. 10.1016/j.ab.2013.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Friedman M. Applications of the Ninhydrin Reaction for Analysis of Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins to Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 385–406. 10.1021/jf030490p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shrivastava A.; Gupta V. B. Methods for the Determination of Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation of the Analytical methods. Chron. Young Sci. 2011, 2, 21–25. 10.4103/2229-5186.79345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jannat M.; Yang K.-L. Continuous Protease Assays Using Liquid Crystal as a Reporter. Sens. Actuators, B 2018, 269, 8–14. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.04.125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ingram A.; Byers L.; Faulds K.; Moore B. D.; Graham D. SERRS-Based Enzymatic Probes for the Detection of Protease Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11846–11847. 10.1021/ja803655h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu H.; Tian H.; Chen M.-F.; You J.-C.; Du L.-M.; Fu Y.-L. Anionic Surfactant Micelle-Mediated Extraction Coupled with Dispersive Magnetic Microextraction for the Determination of Phthalate Esters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7682–7689. 10.1021/jf502364x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES