Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2020 Sep 11;77(Suppl):S112–S115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.044

The colovescical fistula in diverticular disease: Laparoscopic approach in two different cases

Giuseppe Di Buono 1,, Giulia Bonventre 1, Salvatore Buscemi 1, Brenda Randisi 1, Giorgio Romano 1, Antonino Agrusa 1
PMCID: PMC7876919  PMID: 32972892

Highlights

  • The colovescical fistula is one of the complications of diverticular disease.

  • It can cause typical symptoms like pneumaturia and fecaluria affecting the quality of life and sometimes leading to death, usually secondary to sepsis.

  • We studied two patients with clinical, radiological and endoscopic diagnosis of colovescical fistula as a consequence of diverticular disease.

  • We performed a totally laparoscopic treatment with colonic resection and closure of the fistula with intracorporeal sutures.

  • The presence of a colovescical fistula significantly increases the difficult of the laparoscopic colonic resection.

Keywords: Colovescical fistula, Laparoscopy, Complicated diverticulitis, Laparoscopic sutures, Surgical skills, Laparoscopic colorectal resection

Abstract

Introduction

The colovescical fistula is one of the complications of diverticular disease. It can cause significant symptoms like pneumaturia and fecaluria affecting the quality of life and sometimes leading to death, usually secondary to sepsis. We describe two cases of colovescical fistula treated by laparoscopic approach in patients with diagnosis of complicated acute diverticulitis.

Case report

We studied two patients with clinical, radiological and endoscopic diagnosis of colovescical fistula as a consequence of diverticular disease. We performed a totally laparoscopic treatment with colonic resection and colo-proctoanastomosis after the closure of the fistula with intracorporeal sutures.

Discussion

Colovescical fistula should be suspected in patients who present fever with persistent dysuria, pneumaturia or fecaluria. The diagnosis is confirmed by a CT abdominal scan, a colonoscopy in order to rule out a colon cancer and a cystoscopy to assess the grade of bladder involvement.

Conclusion

Although colovescical fistulas caused by diverticular disease were once considered a contraindication to laparoscopic resection, nowadays they are increasingly treated by experienced surgeons using laparoscopic techniques. Compared with laparoscopic surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis the mini-invasive treatment of colovescical fistulas requires a longer operative time and advanced surgical skills.

1. Introduction

Approximately 25% of patients with acute diverticulitis or persistent chronic diverticular inflammation have consensual complications as bowel obstruction because of a colonic stricture, development of abdominal and/or pelvic abscesses, a colonic free perforation with consequent peritonitis and fistulas [1]. Fistula formation is present in 17–27% of surgically treated cases of diverticular disease and the colovescical one is found in 3–4% of these patients. So it should be suspected in patients with diverticular disease who present symptoms like pneumaturia or fecaluria often with fever and lower abdominal pain [2]. Radiological findings, colonoscopy and cystoscopy can supports the diagnosis confirmed during surgical procedure [3,4]. We describe two patients with clinical evidences of pneumaturia and fecaluria as a consequence of a complicated diverticular desease confirmed with CT abdominal scan and colonscopy and totally managed with laparoscopic technique with identification, colonic resection and bladder repair in line with the SCARE criteria [5].

2. Presentation of cases

We studied two patients with clinical, radiological and endoscopic diagnosis of colovescical fistula as a consequence of complicated diverticular disease. The first patient was a 79-years old male (BMI 28.4 kg/m2) who suffered from hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. He had had an acute myocardial infarction 10 years earlier. He arrived to our observation in elective setting after three month of gravative abdominal pain in left flank and in suprapubic region. In the last two week he refered fever with turbid and foul-smelling urine with contemporary emission of air. White blood cell count was 13 × 103/mmc. We performed a CT abdominal scan that showed sigmoid colon with thickened walls and with no cleavage planes from bladder. Colonoscopy confirmed a picture of severe chronic diverticulitis with strong suspicion of colovescical fistula. Cystoscopy demonstrated the fistulous orifice in bladder dome and urinoculture revealed infection from Klebsiella spp. The second patient was a 76-years old female (BMI 27.3 kg/m2) with hypertension who went to emergency room with an acute abdominal pain in suprapubic region with no diarrhea or fever. The patient refered recurrent cystitis in the last six month unresponsive to antibiotic therapy and pneumaturia. White blood cell count was 16 × 103/mmc. Also in this case we performed a CT abdominal scan with findings of sigmoid diverticulitis with no abscess or perforation. The urologist carried out a cystoscopy that highlighted a colovescical fistula and urinoculture identified E. coli. None of these patients had previous abdominal surgery and there were no contraindication to laparoscopic surgery. On the basis of these preoperative clinical and instrumental findings we decided to perform a laparoscopic approach for both cases in elective setting with conversion to open surgery in case of severe pelvic inflammatory syndrome and risk for visceral and/or vascular injuries (e.g. ureter, iliac vessels, small bowel, vaginal dome). The procedures were performed by a senior resident with an equipe experienced in laparoscopic surgery. We decided to perform a laparoscopic approach for both cases. The procedures were performed by a senior resident with an equipe experienced in laparoscopic surgery. We induced pneumoperitoneum by Veress needle [6] and a 10-mm optical trocar was placed in the right para-umbilical region. We placed other three trocars respectively in the right hypochondrium (5 mm), in the right iliac fossa (12 mm) and in the left flank (5 mm) [7]. On laparoscopic exploration of abdominal cavity the sigmoid colon appeared convoluted and with thickened wall firmly attached to the bladder dome configuring a picture of severe diverticular inflammation (Fig. 1). We chose a medial to lateral dissection with isolation of mesenteric inferior vein and artery and then we mobilized the left colon up to the splenic flexure. After identification and preservation of the left ureter under the Gerota fascia, we detached the strict adhesions between the sigmoid colon and the bladder [8]. During these maneuvers we identified the colovescical fistula and a bladder double layer suture with intracorporeal knotting was performed. In the male patient we found a wider fistula with need for resection of the bladder dome in order to obtain a undamaged margin. In the other case, we saw a subcentimetric fistula for whom it was not appropriate to carry out the resection but only the suture in double layer [9]. In both cases we tested laparoscopic suture with bladder filling with indiocyanine green that demonstrated no vescical dye spillage. At the end of this procedure we completed the left hemicolectomy performing a mechanical colo-proctoanastomosis. The patients were satisfied with the treatment received with typical advantages of laparoscopic surgery with rapid postoperative recovery, earlier food intake and less postoperative pain. The postoperative course was uneventful and both patients were discharged on POD 7.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Intraoperative findings of colovescical fistulas: a-b) male patient with a wide colovescical fistula (arrows); we performed a blunt dissection in order to avoid vascular or visceral injuries; c) double line adsorbable barbed suture; d) complete view of the bladder suture and colonic anastomosis (arrows); e) female patient with subcentimetric fistula and its position respect to uterus (arrows); f) course of the hypogastric vessels (dotted line).

3. Discussion

Diverticular disease in Western countries usually involves the sigmoid colon and fistulas most frequently arise from this segment. The most common types of fistulas are colovesical fistulas (65%) and colovaginal fistulas (25%), followed by coloenteric (7%), colouterine (3%), colocutaneous fistulas and complex fistulas with envolvement of multiple pelvic organs (10%) [10]. Although diverticulitis occurs with a slight female predominance colovesical fistulas secondary to diverticulitis have a distinct (2 to 3:1) male predominance because the uterus preserves the bladder from the inflamed sigmoid colon. Patients typically present laboratory findings of leukocytosis in association with urinary symptoms including dysuria or recurrent urinary tract infections often cause of fever (100%), pneumaturia (71%) and fecaluria (51%). Other symptoms occurring in fewer than 50% of patients are chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, hematuria and loss of urine via rectum [11,12]. On CT abdominal scan we can find suggestive features of acute diverticulitis including the presence of localized bowel wall thickening (>4 mm), an increase in soft tissue density within the pericolonic fat secondary to inflammation and the presence of colonic diverticula. The sensitivity and specificity of CT scan for the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis are respectively 94 and 99%. The integration with colonoscopy, cystoscopy or intravenous urography (IVU) is fundamental to preoperatively confirm the diagnosis of colovesical fistula even if nowadays there is not a gold standard test [13,14]. Regarding the operative technique, laparoscopic left colonic resection does not provide difficult maneuvers for experienced surgical team, but the presence of a colovescical fistula or other complex fistulas [15] significantly increases the technical challenge of the procedure and consequently these operation should be performed by a skilled surgeon in advanced laparoscopic surgery [[16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. Surgical treatment of colovescical fistulas provides the identification and dissection of the fistula, resection of the involved colon and bladder repair [21,22]. An incomplete colonic resection or a simple division of the colovescical fistula without colonic resection will lead to higher recurrence rates. The presence of a diverticular colovescical fistula is rarely an indication for urgent surgical procedure (2%). An elective one-stage procedure with primary resection and anastomosis (PRA) is safe and feasible in the most of cases (84%) [[23], [24], [25]]. The one-stage procedure is associated with decreased morbidity and length of hospital stay.

4. Conclusion

The diagnosis and treatment of a colovesical fistula requires multidisciplinary involvement with the radiologist, endoscopist, urologist and surgeon. Treatment requires colonic resection and closure of the fistula in order to reduce the recurrence rate. Laparoscopic left colonic or sigmoid resection does not provide difficult maneuvers for experienced surgical team, but the presence of a colovescical fistula or other complex fistulas significantly increases the technical challenge of the procedure and consequently these procedures should be performed by a skilled surgeon in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Funding

Di Buono Giuseppe and other co-authors have no study sponsor.

Ethical approval

Ethical Approval was not necessary for this study.

We obtained written patient consent to publication.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Author contribution

Di Buono Giuseppe: study design, data collections, data analysis and writing.

Bonventre Giulia: study design, data collections, data analysis and writing.

Buscemi Salvatore: data collections.

Randisi Brenda: data collection.

Romano Giorgio: study design, data collections, data analysis and writing.

Agrusa Antonino: study design, data collections, data analysis and writing.

Registration of research studies

Not applicable.

Guarantor

Di Buono Giuseppe.

Agrusa Antonino.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

This article is part of a supplement entitled Case reports from Italian young surgeons, published with support from the Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences – University of Palermo.

Contributor Information

Giuseppe Di Buono, Email: giuseppe.dibuono@unipa.it.

Giulia Bonventre, Email: giulia.bonv@gmail.com.

Salvatore Buscemi, Email: buscemi.salvatore@gmail.com.

Brenda Randisi, Email: brenda.randisi91@gmail.com.

Giorgio Romano, Email: giorgio.romano@unipa.it.

Antonino Agrusa, Email: antonino.agrusa@unipa.it.

References

  • 1.Ashrafi Akbar N., Sotelo Rene. Colovesical fistulas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;380(June (26)):e51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1900267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garcea G., Majid I., Sutton C.D., Pattenden C.J., Thomas W.M. Diagnosis and management of colovesical fistulae; six-year experience of 90 consecutive cases. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(May (4)):347–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00928.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Melchior S., Cudovic D., Jones J. Diagnosis and surgical management of colovesical fistulas due to sigmoid diverticulitis. J. Urol. 2009;182(September (3)):978–982. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morrison P.D., Addison N.V. A study of colovesical fistulae in a district hospital. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1983;65:221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Agha R.A., Borrelli M.R., Farwana R., Koshy K., Fowler A., Orgill D.P., For the SCARE Group The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus surgical CAse report (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2018;60:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Di Buono G., Buscemi S., Lo Monte A.I., Geraci G., Sorce V., Citarrella R., Gulotta E., Palumbo V.D., Fazzotta S., Gulotta L., Albano D., Galia M., Romano G., Agrusa A. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: preoperative data, surgical technique and clinical outcomes. BMC Surg. 2019;18(April (Suppl. 1)):128. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0456-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Agrusa A., Frazzetta G., Chianetta D., Di Giovanni S., Gulotta L., Di Buno G., Sorce V., Romano G., Gulotta G. “Relaparoscopic” management of surgical complications: the experience of an Emergency Center. Surg. Endosc. 2016;30:2804–2810. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4558-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Agrusa A., Di Buono G., Buscemi S., Cucinella G., Romano G., Gulotta G. 3D laparoscopic surgery: a prospective clinical trial. Oncotarget. 2018;9(April (25)):17325–17333. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24669. eCollection 2018 Apr 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang C.H., Liu K.H., Chen T.C. Enterovesical fistula caused by a bladder squamous cell carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4215. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carson C.C., Malek R.S., Remine W.H. Urologic aspects of vesicoenteric fistulas. J. Urol. 1978;119:744. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57619-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Labs J.D., Sarr M.G., Fishman E.K. Complications of acute diverticulitis of the colon: improved early diagnosis with computerized tomography. Am. J. Surg. 1988;155:331. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80726-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holroyd D.J., Banerjee S., Beavan M. Colovaginal and colovesical fistulae: the diagnostic paradigm. Tech. Coloproctol. 2012;16:119. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0807-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Woods R.J., Lavery I.C., Fazio V.W. Internal fistulas in diverticular disease. Dis. Colon Rectum. 1988;31:591. doi: 10.1007/BF02556792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bonventre G., Di Buono G., Buscemi S., Romano G., Agrusa A. Laparoscopic management of cholecystocolonic fistula: a case report and a brief literature review. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020;68:218–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.02.052. Epub 2020 Feb 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Daniels I.R., Bekdash B., Scott H.J. Diagnostic lessons learnt from a series of enterovesical fistulae. Colorectal Dis. 2002;4:459. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Agrusa A., Romano G., Navarra G., Conzo G., Pantuso G., Buono G.D., Citarrella R., Galia M., Monte A.L., Cucinella G., Gulotta G. Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review. Oncotarget. 2017;8(October (60)):102392–102400. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22059. eCollection 2017 Nov 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cucinella G., Perino A., Romano G., Di Buono G., Calagna G., Sorce V., Gulotta L., Triolo M., Billone V., Gulotta G., Agrusa A. Endometrial cancer: robotic versus laparoscopic treatment. Preliminary report. GIOG. 2015;37(November-December (6)) 283-273. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Agrusa A., Romano G., Dominguez L.J., Amato G., Citarrella R., Vernuccio L., Di Buono G., Sorce V., Gulotta L., Galia M., Mansueto P., Gulotta G. Adrenal cavernous hemangioma: which correct decision making process? Acta Med. Mediterranea. 2016;32:385–389. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cucinella G., Calagna G., Romano G., Di Buono G., Gugliotta G., Saitta S., Adile G., Manzone M., Accardi G., Perino A., Agrusa A. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study. G Chir. 2016;37(May-June (3)):113–117. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.3.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Menenakos E., Hahnloser D., Nassiopoulos K. Laparoscopic surgery for fistulas that complicate diverticular disease. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2003;388:189. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0392-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Najjar S.F., Jamal M.K., Savas J.F., Miller T.A. The spectrum of colovesical fistula and diagnostic paradigm. Am. J. Surg. 2004;188:617. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Solkar M.H., Forshaw M.J., Sankararajah D. Colovesical fistula--is a surgical approach always justified? Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:467. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.El-Haddad H.M., Kassem M.I., Sabry A.A., Abouelfotouh A. Surgical protocol and outcome for sigmoidovesical fistula secondary to diverticular disease of the left colon: a retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Surg. 2018;56:115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dolejs S.C., Penning A.J., Guzman M.J. Perioperative management of patients with colovesical fistula. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019;23:1867. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Smeenk R.M., Plaisier P.W., van der Hoeven J.A., Hesp W.L. Outcome of surgery for colovesical and colovaginal fistulas of diverticular origin in 40 patients. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012;16:1559. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1919-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES