Abstract
Objectives
Identification of environmental and hospital indicators that may influence coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality in different countries is essential for better management of this infectious disease.
Study design
Correlation analysis between healthcare system indicators and COVID-19 mortality rate in Europe.
Methods
For each country in the European Union (EU), the date of the first diagnosed case and the crude death rate for COVID-19 were retrieved from the John Hopkins University website. These data were then combined with environmental, hospital and clinical indicators extracted from the European Health Information Gateway of the World Health Organization.
Results
The COVID-19 death rate in EU countries (mean 1.9 ± 0.8%) was inversely associated with the number of available general hospitals, physicians and nurses. Significant positive associations were also found with the rate of acute care bed occupancy, as well as with the proportion of population who were aged older than 65 years, overweight or who had cancer. Total healthcare expenditure, public sector health expenditure and the number of hospital and acute care beds did not influence COVID-19 death rate.
Conclusions
Some common healthcare system inadequacies, such as limited numbers of general hospitals, physicians and nurses, in addition to high acute care bed occupancy, may be significant drivers of nationwide COVID-19 mortality rates in EU countries.
Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, Mortality, Hospital care
Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread around the world, there is a broad divergence in terms of COVID-19 mortality across different countries, as recently highlighted by Teixeira da Silva and Tsigaris.1 In addition to identifying clinical and laboratory predictors of individual disease progression, it is also vital to recognise that environmental and hospital indicators may influence the impact of COVID-19, thus, in part, explaining the wide heterogeneity of death rates observed across different countries.
To investigate this matter further, the present study retrieved the date of the first diagnosed case and the crude death rate for COVID-19 for each country within the European Union (EU) from the John Hopkins University website.2 These data were then combined with a number of environmental, hospital and clinical indicators extracted from the European Health Information Gateway (EHIG) of the World Health Organization (WHO).3 More specifically, separate queries were made in the EHIG database, using the specific keywords (i.e. healthcare indicators) listed in Table 1 , to retrieve data for each EU country. According to the WHO regional office for Europe, the information contained in the EHIG repository is derived from various reliable sources, including WHO/Europe's technical programmes and partner organisations, such as Eurostat, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the United Nations.3 The most recent available data of the EU healthcare indicators were imported into a Microsoft Excel file (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, United States) along with the country-specific COVID-19 crude death rates. After logarithmic data conversion, a multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to identify potentially independent associations; death rate (%) was set as the dependent variable, whilst environmental, healthcare and clinical indicators were set as independent variables. Statistical analyses was carried out using Analyse-it (Analyse-it Software Ltd, Leeds, UK), with significance set at P < 0.05. The analyses were based on electronic searches in unrestricted, publicly available databases, and therefore, no informed consent or ethical committee approval was required.
Table 1.
Parameter | β coefficient (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|
1st diagnosed case (date) | −284 (−1002 to 433) | 0.380 |
Environmental indicators | ||
Mean yearly temperature (°C) | 0.274 (−0.484 to 1.031) | 0.421 |
Density (population/km2) | −0.243 (−0.493 to 0.007) | 0.055 |
Proportion of urban population (%) | −1.190 (−3.970 to 1.590) | 0.345 |
People per room in occupied housing unit (number) | −0.384 (−1.595 to 0.826) | 0.477 |
Gross domestic product (US$ per capita) | 0.722 (−0.003 to 1.447) | 0.051 |
Hospital indicators | ||
Total healthcare expenditure (US$ per capita) | −0.002 (−1.597 to 1.594) | 0.998 |
Public sector healthcare expenditure (% of total health expenditure) | −0.737 (−1.737 to 0.264) | 0.125 |
General hospitals (per 100,000) | −0.513 (−0.918 to −0.107) | 0.020 |
Hospital beds (per 100,000) | 0.037 (−0.786 to 0.860) | 0.918 |
Acute care beds (per 100,000) | 1.039 (−0.194 to 2.273) | 0.056 |
Acute care bed occupancy (%) | 3.639 (1.743–5.534) | 0.003 |
Physicians (per 100,000) | −1.494 (−2.792 to −0.196) | 0.039 |
Nurses (per 100,000) | −1.290 (−2.242 to −0.339) | 0.015 |
Clinical indicators | ||
Estimated life expectancy at birth (years) | −9.036 (−19.270 to 1.198) | 0.075 |
Population aged >65 years (%) | 3.019 (0.448–5.590) | 0.027 |
Age-standardised current tobacco smoking in people >15 years (%) | −0.943 (−2.817 to 0.930) | 0.273 |
Age-standardised overweight in people >18 years (%) | 6.886 (0.347–13.426) | 0.042 |
Incidence of cancer (per 100,000) | 0.577 (0.117–1.037) | 0.041 |
People self-assessing health as good (%) | 2.170 (0.797–3.543) | 0.007 |
CI, confidence interval. Statistically significant associations are given in bold.
The results of this investigation are summarised in Table 1. The COVID-19 death rate in EU countries (mean 1.9 ± 0.8%) varied between 0.6% in Cyprus and 3.6% in Bulgaria, and it was inversely associated with the number of available general hospitals, physicians and nurses. Significant positive associations with mortality were found with the rate of acute care bed occupancy, as well as with the proportion of the population who were aged >65 years, overweight or who had cancer. A positive association with mortality was also found with the proportion of the population self-assessing their health as good. Importantly, neither total healthcare expenditure, public sector health expenditure nor the number of hospital and acute care beds were found to influence COVID-19 mortality rate. Moreover, in the present analysis, no environmental parameters were found to have a significant influence on COVID-19 mortality (Table 1), although the association with gross domestic product per capita and population density were of borderline statistical significance.
Taken together, the results of this study suggest that some common healthcare system inadequacies, such as a limited number of general hospitals, physicians and nurses, along with high acute care bed occupancy, may be significant drivers of nationwide COVID-19 mortality rates in EU countries. Additional parameters that were found to be associated with increased COVID-19 death rate included, as expected, a high proportion of population aged >65 years, along with a high national burden of overweight individuals and cancer diagnoses. This is not surprising because these parameters have been repeatedly shown to individually contribute to a poor prognosis in COVID-19.4 Notably, no significant associations of COVID-19 mortality were found with total healthcare expenditure, public sector health expenditure or availability of hospital and acute care beds.
It is now unquestionable that COVID-19 has imposed a remarkable burden on healthcare resources around the world, with significant concerns over the capacity to manage the huge number of COVID-19 cases that are diagnosed each day. According to this analysis, it seems that is not the total amount of money spent by national governments but rather the way this money is spent on healthcare and hospital organisation that may have the most significant influence on COVID-19 management and outcomes. In fact, it seems that even a large availability of hospital or acute care beds may be ineffective in reducing COVID-19 mortality if this is not combined with increased availability of physicians and nurses and improved hospital accessibility.
Author statements
Ethical approval
Not required.
Funding
No funding was received for this work.
Competing interests
None declared.
References
- 1.Teixeira da Silva J.A., Tsigaris P. Policy determinants of COVID-19 pandemic-induced fatality rates across nations. Publ Health. 2020;187:140–142. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. COVID-19 map. Available at:: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Last accessed, December 29, 2020.
- 3.World Health Organization. European health information Gateway. Available at:: https://gateway.euro.who.int/en/hfa-explorer/#FeAPP039Vb. Last accessed, December 29, 2020.
- 4.Mesas A.E., Cavero-Redondo I., Álvarez-Bueno C., Sarriá Cabrera M.A., Maffei de Andrade S., Sequí-Dominguez I., Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Predictors of in-hospital COVID-19 mortality: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis exploring differences by age, sex and health conditions. PloS One. 2020;15 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]