Abstract
Background
Early detection of disease progression associated with severe COVID-19, and access to proper medical care lowers fatality rates of severe cases. Currently, no studies had systematically examined the variables in detecting severe COVID-19.
Method
Systematic searching of electronic databases identified observational studies which recruited participants with confirmed COVID-19 infection who were divided into different groups according to disease severity were identified.
Results
To analysis 41 studies with 5064 patients were included.Patients who are elderly (SMD, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.8), male (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.11) and have comorbidities or flu-like symptoms were significantly associated with the development to severe cases. Severe cases were associated with significant increased WBC (OR, 5.83; 95% CI, 2.76 to 12.32), CRP (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.62 to 8.03), D-dimer (SMD, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.28), AST (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 3.18 to 6.77) and LDH (OR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.09 to 30.21). CT manifestation of bilateral lung involvement (OR, 4.55; 95% CI, 2.17 to 9.51) was associated with the severe cases.
Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings offer guidance for a wide spectrum of clinicians to early identify severe COVID-19 patients, transport to specialised centres, and initiate appropriate treatment.
Key Messages
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 41 studies including 5,064 patients with confirmed COVID-19. Severe cases were associated with age, male gender, and with fever, cough and respiratory diseases, increased WBC, CRP, D-dimer, AST and LDH levels. Furthermore, CT manifestation of bilateral lung involvement was associated with the severe cases.
These findings provide guidance to health professionals with early identification of severe COVID-19 patients, transportation to specialised care and initiate appropriate supportive treatment.
Keywords: COVID-19, clinical characteristics, disease severity, laboratory indicators, meta-analysis
Introduction
Since December 2019, a severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) named Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), began to spread from Wuhan throughout China, and indeed the world [1,2]. Although most patients have mild symptoms and good prognosis, COVID-19 can develop to severe illnesses including pneumonia, pulmonary edoema, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ failure or death [3]. As of April 2, 2020, there were 827,419 confirmed cases globally. Furthermore, COVID-19 had caused 40, 777 deaths worldwide.In a recent report summarising the epidemiological characteristics of 44,415 Chinese patients with COVID-19, 2,087 (5%) were diagnosed as severe cases, defined as severe hypoxaemia and/or the presence of other organ failure [4]. Patients with severe COVID-19 may develop rapidly worsening respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [5]. These characteristics indicate that the transition time from mild to severe disease is short, and it is difficult to recognise early. Notably, many patients develop respiratory failure with hypoxaemia but without any signs of respiratory distress, especially for elder individuals (“silent hypoxemia”) [6].
To date, the effects of conventional methods on predicting those patients who will go on to develop severe COVID-19 are limited. Hence, there is an urgent need to find the significant clinical signs or biomarkers for the transition from mild to severe cases. Previous retrospective studies or meta-analysis have provided information on common factors for severe cases, including age, fever, cough, fatigue, comorbidities and chest computed tomography (CT) changes [7–25]. However, the prevalence of clinical manifestations in severe patients with COVID-19 were inconsistent and highly variable across outcome measures, populations, and assessment methods, such as fever (43–98%), cough (60–96%), fatigue (10–80.6%), comorbidity (32–100%), and bilateral pneumonia changes (45–87.2%) [9–25] depending on the subjects, the severity of illness, and the definition of severe cases. In addition, previous studies described the characteristics between severe and non-severe cases with COVID-19, while without statistical comparison and subgroup analysis on detailed demographic, geographic, clinical, or laboratory parameters [25].
Currently, we perform this systematic review and meta-analysis to reveal the proportion on unduplicated reports regarding the demographical and geographical-specific clinical characteristics, laboratory variables and imaging manifestations of COVID-19 illness ranging from symptomless to more severe diseases, which could help policymakers and healthcare workers for making decision.
Methods
Search strategy
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical and image features at different stages of patients with COVID-19 was undertaken by group of evidence-based study on COVID-19. The search included all relevant studies published prior to 1 April 2020. Search terms were as follows: COVID19 virus or COVID-19 virus or coronavirus disease 2019 or SARS-CoV-2 or SARS2 or 2019-nCoV or 2019 novel coronavirus or 2019 novel coronavirus infection AND COVID-19 or coronavirus disease 2019 or 2019-nCoV disease or 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia or 2019-nCoV infected pneumonia.
Pubmed: (((COVID-19[Title/Abstract] OR novel coronavirus pneumonia [Title/Abstract]) OR NCP[Title/Abstract]) OR 2019-nCoV[Title/Abstract]) OR SARS-CoV-2[Title/Abstract] AND (("2020/01/01"[PDAT]: "2020/04/01"[PDAT]) AND "humans"[MeSH Terms])
Other databases：COVID-19[Title/Abstract] OR novel coronavirus pneumonia [Title/Abstract]) OR NCP[Title/Abstract]) OR 2019-nCoV[Title/Abstract]) OR SARS-CoV-2[Title/Abstract]
The inclusive criteria were: (1) Observation studies; (2) Enrolled participants with confirmed COVID 19; (3) Compared disease severity of COVID-19 (severe vs. non-severe); (4) Provided information on any of clinical symptoms, laboratory test or image feature outcomes. The exclusive criteria were: (1) Comments, news, letters, case report, case series, or viewpoint; (2) Non-human studies; (3) Duplicated sample or data; (4) Studies that did not report on outcomes of interest.
Data extraction and quality assessment
The following parameters were assessed: selection of study population, comparability, and ascertainment of exposure/outcome. Any discrepancy between the two reviewers was discussed by involving a third reviewer (LL). Two reviewers (X.M.W. and B.Z.) independently assessed the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [10] (eTable 1).
Statistical analysis
An individual meta-analysis was performed for each feature. We distinguished whether the laboratory variables increased or decreased based on the reference values provided in the included studies. Odds ratio (OR) estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) of clinical symptoms, binary classification of laboratory indicators and image features associated with severe COVID-19 cases were calculated by pooling study-specific estimates. Further, we also calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI for changes in the laboratory variables of severe cases vs. non-severe cases because the scales of measurement of the laboratory variables varied. Subgroup analysis based on the age (older than or equal to 45 years or less than 45 years), region (inside or outside Wuhan), sample size (more than or equal to 80 or less than 80). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool the data. Heterogeneity was measured by I2 variables. I2 > 50% or p < .10 was defined as substantial heterogeneity [11]. Outcomes from identified studies grouped according to prespecified study-level characteristics were compared using stratified meta-analysis. Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias. Stata 12.0 software (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was applied to conduct this meta-analysis. P value less than 0.05 was defined as statistical significant.
Results
Search results
Initial literature review identified 1378 potential publications by the electronic database searches. After screening titles and abstracts, 1279 studies excluded. Then we evaluated the full-texts of the publications and 42 studies were excluded. Finally, 41 studies [21114-52] involved 5064 patients with COVID-19 were included in current meta-analysis. eFigure 1 in Supplementary 1 shows PRISMA flowchart of the including studies. Table 1 lists characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis. All of including studies (n = 41) were retrospective design. Quality assessment by the NOS indicates high-quality data for all including studies (eTable 2 in Supplementary 1). The PRISMA checklist is shown in eTable 3 in Supplementary 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| First Author | Sample period (DD/MM/YEAR) |
Region | Diagnostic criteria* | Total (Non-Severe + Severe*) | Criteria for grouping | Gender -male (%) |
Age (mean or median) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuan Liu [12] | 23/01/2020-08/02/2020 | Multicenter | 5th edition | 32 (28 + 4) | Non-Severe or Severe | 20 (62.50) | 38.5 |
| Chaolin Huang [2] | 16/12/2019-02/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | WHO interim guidance | 41 (28 + 13) | No ICU or ICU | 30 (73.17) | 49.0 |
| Chen Chen [26] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 6th edition | 150 (126 + 24) | Non-Severe or Severe | 84 (56.00) | 59.0 |
| Dan Fang [27] | 27/01/2020-14/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 305 (259 + 46) | Non-Severe or Severe | 146 (47.87) | 57.0 |
| Dan Li [28] | 22/02/2020-15/02/2020 | Liaoning | 5th edition | 30 (20 + 10) | Non-Severe or Severe | 18 (60.00) | 43.0 |
| Dawei Wang [22] | 01/01/2020-28/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | WHO interim guidance | 138 (102 + 36) | No ICU or ICU | 75 (54.35) | 56.0 |
| Jianzhong Liu [29] | 01/01/2020-08/02/2020 | Shanxi | 5th edition | 15 (12 + 3) | Non-Severe or Severe | 10 (66.67) | 46.5 |
| Jinjin Zhang [9] | 16/01/2020-03/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 3-5th edition | 140 (82 + 58) | Non-Severe or Severe | 69 (49.29) | 57.0 |
| Juan Xiong [17] | 17/01/2020-20/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 6th edition | 89 (58 + 31) | Non-Severe or Severe | 41 (46.07) | 53. 0 |
| Ke Wen [19] | 20/01/2020-08/02/2020 | Beijing | 5th edition | 46 (35 + 11) | Non-Severe or Severe | 27 (58.70) | 41.8 |
| Kebin Cheng [30] | 01/01/2020-06/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 463 (282 + 181) | Non-Severe or Severe | 244 (52.70) | 51.0 |
| Keke Hou [31] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Sichuan | 6th edition | 56 (38 + 18) | Non-Severe or Severe | 29 (51.79) | 48.0 |
| Kunhua Li [32] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Sichuan | 5th edition | 83 (58 + 25) | Non-Severe or Severe | 44 (53.01) | 45.5 |
| Lei Chen [33] | 14/01/2020-29/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 4th edition | 29 (15 + 14) | Non-Severe or Severe | 21 (72.41) | 56.0 |
| Lu Huang [34] | 01/01/2020-31/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 103 (58 + 45) | Non-Severe or Severe | 61 (59.22) | 65.0 |
| Min Liu [35] | 10/01/2020-31/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 30 (26 + 4) | Non-Severe or Severe | 10 (33.33) | 35.0 |
| Ming Xu [16] | 22/01/2020-29/01/2020 | Henan | 4th edition | 23 (19 + 4) | Non-Severe or Severe | 15 (65.22) | 46.0 |
| Qiu Wan [23] | 26/01/2020-05/02/2020 | Sichuan | 5th edition | 153 (132 + 21) | Non-Severe or Severe | 77 (50.33) | 45.4 |
| Shi Chen [36] | 24/12/2019-28/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 109 (65 + 44) | Non-Severe or Severe | 48 (44.04) | 52.5 |
| Sijia Tian [24] | 20/01/2020-10/02/2020 | Beijing | 2-5th edition | 262 (216 + 46) | Non-Severe or Severe | 127 (48.47) | 47.5 |
| Tianxin Xiang [18] | 21/01/2020-27/01/2020 | Jiangxi | 4th edition | 49 (40 + 9) | Non-Severe or Severe | 33 (67.35) | 42.9 |
| Wei Liu [37] | 30/12/2019-15/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 4th edition | 78 (67 + 11) | Improvement/Stabilization or Progression# | 39 (50.00) | 38.0 |
| Wen Chen [38] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Hubei Jingmen | 7th edition | 91 (70 + 21) | Non-Severe or Severe | 43 (47.25) | 41.6 |
| Xiaohu Li [39] | 26/01/2020-18/02/2020 | Anhui | 6th edition | 60 (58 + 2) | Non-Severe or Severe | 40 (66.67) | 39.0 |
| Xiaowei Fang [40] | 22/01/2020-18/02/2020 | Anhui | 6th edition | 79 (55 + 24) | Non-Severe or Severe | 45 (56.96) | 45.1 |
| Yaling Shi [41] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Guangdong | 5-6th edition | 164 (150 + 14) | Non-Severe or Severe | 75 (45.73) | 50.0 |
| Yan Deng[42] | 01/01/2020-21/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 6th edition | 225 (109 + 116) | Recovered or Death | 124 (55.11) | Not provided |
| Yudong Peng [43] | 20/01/2020-15/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 1-6th edition | 112 (96 + 16) | Non-Severe or Severe | 53 (47.32) | 62.0 |
| Yuhuan Xu [15] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Beijing | 5th edition | 50 (37 + 13) | Non-Severe or Severe | 29 (58.00) | 43.9 |
| Zhongliang Wang [20] | 16/01/2020-29/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 3th edition | 69 (55 + 14) | SpO2 ≥ 90% or not | 32 (46.38) | 42.0 |
| Wen Gao [44] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Beijing | 6th edition | 90 (57 + 33) | Non-Severe or Severe | 42 (46.67) | 53 |
| Li Dong [45] | 15/01/2020-31/01/2020 | Hebei | 6th edition | 71 (57 + 14) | Non-Severe or Severe | 43 (60.56) | 44.25 |
| Guangxiao Tang [25] | 24/01/2020-04/02/2020 | Sichuan | 5th edition | 83 (70 + 13) | Non-Severe or Severe | 44 (53.01) | 44.9 |
| Shuxiang Zhang [14] | 22/01/2020-04/02/2020 | Ningxia | 5th edition | 34 (29 + 5) | Non-Severe or Severe | 20 (58.82) | 41 |
| Kunwei Li [32] | 18/01/2020-07/02/2020 | Guangdong | 7th edition | 78 (70 + 8) | Non-Severe or Severe | 38 (48.72) | 44.6 |
| Shi Y [46] | 01/01/2020-29/02/2020 | Zhejiang | 1-6th edition | 487 (438 + 49) | Non-Severe or Severe | 259 (53.18) | 46 |
| Yun Ling [47] | 20/01/2020-10/02/2020 | Shanghai | 5th edition | 292 (271 + 21) | Non-Severe or Severe | 154 (52.74) | 49.9 |
| Fei Zhou [13] | 29/12/2019-31/01/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | WHO interim guidance | 191 (137 + 54) | Recovered or Death | 119 (62.30) | 56 |
| Tao Chen [48] | 13/01/2020-12/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 6th edition | 274 (161 + 113) | Recovered or Death | 171 (62.41) | 62 |
| Rong Wang [21] | 20/01/2020-14/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 96 (42 + 54) | Non-Severe or Severe | 46 (47.92) | Not provided |
| Huan Han [49] | 31/01/2020-10/02/2020 | Hubei Wuhan | 5th edition | 94 (49 + 45) | Non-Severe or Severe | 48 (51.06) | Not provided |
*National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (1–7th edition).
#progression group (common-type changed to severe- or critical-type, or death; severe-type changed to critical-type or death; critical-type progressed to death) and improvement/stabilization group (common-, severe-, and critical-types remained unchanged; severe-type changed to common-type; critical-type changed to severe- or common-type).
Demographical characteristics and comorbidities
The overall difference in age, gender and comorbidities between patients with or without severe COVID-19 was shown in Figure 1. Age (SMD, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.8; p < .001) and male gender (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39-2.11; p < .001) were associated with a nearly 2-fold higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Diabetes (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.59-3.57; p < .001), cardiovascular disease (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.19-4.56, p < .001), cerebrovascular disease (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.29-8.69, p = .013) and hypertension (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.79-3.88; p < .001) were significantly involved in the development of severe COVID-19. Presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR, 6.92; 95% CI, 2.84-16.82; p < .001) and other lung diseases (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.97-10.06; p < .001) were associated with a significantly higher rate of severe COVID-19 than other collected indicators. The results of subgroup analysis on demographical characteristics and comorbidities were shown in eTable4 (SMD) and eTable 5(OR).
Figure 1.
The results of basic information and disease in non-severe group and severe group. (A) The SMD of basic information and disease in non-severe group and severe group. (B) The OR of basic information and disease in non-severe group and severe group.
Clinical manifestations
Regarding the clinical manifestations, dyspnoea (OR, 5.08; 95% CI: 2.61-9.86; p < .001) and shortness of breath (OR, 4.9; 95% CI: 1.28-18.74; p = .02) were more prevalent clinical manifestations associated with severe disease (Figure 2). The risk for development of severe COVID-19 disease was higher in patients who had fever (OR, 1.53; 95% CI: 1.09-2.13; p = .013), expectoration (OR, 1.53; 95% CI: 1.04-2.27; p = .032) and cough (OR, 1.52; 95% CI: 1.23-1.88; p < .001) and muscle ache/fatigue (OR, 1.75; 95% CI: 1.22-2.51; p = .002). Detailed subgroup analysis for the risk of severe COVID-19 cases was displayed in eTable 5 in Supplementary 1.
Figure 2.
The OR of Clinical Symptom in non-severe group and severe group.
Laboratory variables
We classified laboratory variables into different categories (Figure 3). In terms of infection, nutrition, coagulation, organ function and internal environmental indicators and other indicators, a random-effects model meta-analysis showed that white blood cell count (WBC) (SMD, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.67; p < .001), neutrophils count (SMD, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.42 to 3.76; p < .001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.19 to 4.3; p < .001), procalcitonin (PCT) (SMD, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.04 to 4.57; p < .001), activated thromboplastin time (PT) (SMD, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.21 to 2.3; p = .018), D-dimer (D2) (SMD, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.28; p < .001), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (SMD, 1; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.74; p = .009), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (SMD, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.78 to 2.63; p <0.001), total bilirubin (TB) (SMD, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.76; p = .012), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (SMD, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.54; p = .001), creatinine (Cr) (SMD, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.7; p = .003), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (SMD, 4.63; 95% CI, 2.71 to 6.54; p < .001), Troponin I (TnI) (SMD, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.16; p < .001), creatine kinase (Ck) (SMD, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.33 to 3.01; p = .014), serum amyloid A (SAA) levels (SMD, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.71 to 2.14; p < .001) were higher, while lymphocyte count (LC) (SMD, −2.09; 95% CI, −2.68 to −1.5; p < .001), albumin (ALB) levels (SMD, −2.35; 95% CI, −3.57 to −1.14; p < .001), haemoglobin (Hb) levels (SMD, −0.29; 95% CI, −0.49 to −0.0; p = .005) and partial pressure of oxygen (SMD, −5.49; 95% CI, −7.95 to −3.03; p < .001) were lower in severe cases compared with the non-severe group.
Figure 3.
The results of Laboratory Findings in non-severe group and severe group. (A) The SMD of Laboratory Findings in non-severe group and severe group. (B) The OR of Laboratory Findings in non-severe group and severe group.
The results of categorical variables of indicators were shown that decreased WBC (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.9; p = .04), increased WBC (OR, 5.83; 95% CI, 2.76 to 12.32; p < 0.001), increased CRP (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.62 to 8.03; p = 0.002), AST level more than 40 (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 3.18 to 6.77; p < 0.001), increased LDH (OR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.09 to 30.21; p = 0.002), increased CK (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.32 to 4.78; p = 0.005) and decreased LC (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.95 to 5.47; p <0.001), decreased platelet count (PLT) (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.6; p = 0.013), were associated with severe cases compared with the non-severe group.
Notably, the heterogeneity test showed a statistically significant heterogeneity with an I2 of 60%. In addition, the results of laboratory variables subgroup analysis were shown in eTable 6 (SMD) and eTable 7 (OR) in supplementary 1.
Oxygen partial pressure, respiratory frequency and pulmonary CT manifestations
eFigure 2 in Supplementary 1 showed the oxygen partial pressure, respiratory frequency and pulmonary CT manifestations. Bilateral lung involvement (OR, 4.55; 95% CI: 2.17-9.51; p < .001) and interleaf thickening (OR, 1.89; 95% CI: 1.03-3.47; p = .039) were significantly associated with the disease progression. The results of CT manifestations subgroup analysis was in eTable 5 (OR) in Supplementary 1.
Subgroup analysis stratified by region
Subgroup analysis on region of China were divided into main geographical areas (Wuhan and outside Wuhan), which was shown in eFigure 3. Patients with dyspnoea, hypertension, diabetes, AST > 40 and increased WBC and CRP but lower LC levels were with high risk to develop severe COVID-19 both in and outside Wuhan (eTable 5). However, cerebrovascular disease (OR, 3.29; 95% CI: 1.14-9.45; p = .027), higher LDH (OR, 7.92; 95% CI: 1.85-33.98; p = .005) were independent risk factors for patients with severe COVID-19 on admission in Wuhan, while expectoration (OR, 2.24; 95%CI: 1.13-4.44; p = .02), muscle ache/fatigue (OR, 2.83; 95% CI: 1.42-5.67; p = .003) were significant for patients outside Wuhan (eTable 5).
Publication bias
Egger’s test showed no significant publication bias in cough (p = .08), LC (p = .26) and bilateral lung involvement imaging (p = .14) studies, respectively.
Discussion
The COVID-19 is an emerging condition that primarily threatens the human life, health and safety [2]. Overall, most cases (81%) of China were classified as mild or common, 14% of confirmed cases were severe and only 5% were critical. The case fatality rate was 49% [4]. Facing a highly infectious disease, it demands efforts in epidemiological, diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive fields during a pandemic [50]. However, we still have a lot of unknowns and blind spots about COVID-19, which are very harmful to deal with the serious consequences.
Factors regarding clinical, laboratory, and image features were associated with deterioration of the disease and outcomes, and constitute critical knowledge should be carefully studied in order to reduce mortality caused by COVID-19. In current comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis which exactly ruled out possible duplicate cases, we found that several factors were associated with severe outcome: (i) individuals with higher age, male gender, a combination of lung diseases, diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases; (ii) typical clinical manifestations of hypoxia including dyspnoea and chest tightness; common symptoms including muscle ache/fatigue, expectoration and nausea/vomiting; (iii) abnormal laboratory indicators including infection (WBC, LC, lymphocyte ratio (LR), CRP, PCT), nutrition (ALB, Hb), coagulation (PT, D2), organ function and internal environmental indicators (ALT, AST, TB, BUN, CK, LDH, TNI); (iv) bilateral lung involvement shown in pulmonary CT. Together, our findings present concerns about the characteristics for developing severe outcomes among patients infected by the COVID-19.
Our results showed that males were more likely to be severely infected by SARS-CoV-2 than females, which was consistent with the results of a study performed by Guan et al. [51]. Older people are more susceptible to infection and have a higher risk of progression to severe disease, especially those with comorbidities. Recent report showed that no deaths occurred in the group aged 9 years and younger, but cases in those aged 70 to 79 years had an 8.0% case-fatality rate and even cases in those aged 80 years and older had a 14.8% case-fatality rate [4].
Compared with the non-severe patient, previous study reported that hypertension, respiratory system disease, cardiovascular disease were risk factors for patients with severe infection, which was consistent with our findings [52]. Interestingly, we found that people with previous chronic respiratory disease had a higher risk for severity. A recent study about influenza illness suggested that compared to patients with no comorbidities, the risk of death were more prevalent in those who had COPD (OR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.10–2.01) [52]. In our subgroup analysis stratified by age, compared with patients younger than 45 years, patients having chronic respiratory disease older than 45 years were more likely to be with severe disease. Therefore, healthcare workers should be closely monitoring the elderly male patients with chronic respiratory diseases in order to making early management contributed to the reduction in mortality.
Moreover, clinical manifestations and laboratory abnormalities among patients with COVID-19 were also described in recent studies [53,54]. Inconsistent with the prior reports on clinical sings such as fever, cough, dyspnoea, expectoration, we found dyspnoea was associated with the majority of severe patients with COVID-19, which were also significant in subgroup analysis stratified by age, region and sample. This may be due to the lower tolerance of patients with ARDS to hypoxia [55], and studies with large number of patients are needed to further validate our findings. For laboratory variables, the previous evidence on laboratory abnormalities with severe COVID-19 among description studies were abnormal leukocyte count and lymphopenia but without statistical tests [51]. Our study found that pooled ORs of leukocytosis and lymphopenia were significantly associated with severe outcome, which may be related to different definitions of severe patients. However, due to the different definitions of severe and non-severe cases in different studies, different conclusions have been drawn. Some studies had applied American Thoracic Society guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia classification criteria [51] and some studies had applied WHO interim guidance [56] or diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (1-7th edition) made by National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China [57]. This may be the reason why leukocytosis and lymphopenia have different meanings. Although the cause and mechanism are still uncertain, careful attention should be paid to changes in these symptoms and indicators to prevent the disease from worsening.
In view of the high amount of cytokines induced by severe SARS-CoV-2 infection [58], immune system is activated by the inflammatory response, causing a series of secondary organ functions [39]. In our study, we found that there were significantly different degrees of abnormalities in multiple indicators of organ function, which was also in line with the clinical trend of severe patients with COVID-19. Consistent with the prior reports, pulmonary CT images could manifest different imaging features or patterns in COVID-19 patients with a different time course and disease severity [59].
We further searched the English (Pubmed) and Chinese (CNKI) database as well as preprint server (https://www.preprints.org) about systematic review and meta-analysis regarding COVID-19 clinical, laboratory and imaging findings. A brief report based on only ten studies, addressing limited variables, such as fever, cough, abnormal chest images, patients in critical ill and crude death of patients with COVID-19 [60]. Another single-arm meta-analysis investigated the clinical symptoms and laboratory findings of COVID-19 patients and explained the discharge rate and fatality rate [61]. Recently, in a similar study, Rodriguez-Morales et al. summarised the prevalence of clinical, laboratory, and imaging features in patients with COVID-19 using random-effects model meta-analysis as we did. They also evaluated the frequency of patients required intensive care unit, but they did not assess the risk of underlying diseases in severe patients compared to non-severe patients [53]. Yang et al. assessed the risk of comorbidities in the severe COVID-19 patients compared with the non-severe cases, and revealed hypertension, respiratory system disease, cardiovascular disease were significant risk factors which were consistent with our findings. However, there were no data on clinical manifestations, laboratory or imaging findings [62]. In addition, there were other pooled studies focus on comorbidities [62] and indicators such as thrombocytopenia, cardiac troponin I or procalcitonin [63,64]. Comparing these studies with ours, we compressively excluded duplicate cases or reports individually according to defined protocol, thus, provided strong evidence on the clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics of severe patients.
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of our study include a number of studies comprehensively reviewed with a non-duplicated samples and assessed the detailed clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables in detecting severe COVID-19 cases. Recently, hundreds of papers related to COVID-19, including research articles, case series, brief reports or systematic reviews have been published rapidly. Notably, Bauchner H et al. provided a concern on “Possible Reporting of the Same Patients With COVID-19 in Different Reports” [65], suggesting it may preclude valid meta-analyses. Arguably, during literature searching and data extraction process of our study, we carefully reviewed information which could indicate duplicates such as authors, affiliations, or time at admission of subjects, e.g. in order to remove duplicated reports. Thus, we believe that despite the observed heterogeneity, the conduct of current meta-analysis was appropriate and our conclusions valid. However, there were some limitations in our systematic review and meta-analysis. First, most of the included studies were retrospective or cross-sectional design and lacked of dynamic and continuous data, so this may restrict causal and relative deduction on the correlation between severity COVID-19 and its risk factors. Secondly, we did not have more information regarding the imaging variables; for example, most studies reported the chest CT findings as unilateral or bilateral. Third, all included studies were from China, which emphasising this gap in the literature. It is needed to conduct further studies worldwide, to get a more comprehensive understanding of COVID-19.
Implications of findings for clinical practice
The pooled overall, demographic and geographic characteristics of clinical symptoms, laboratory variables and image features for patients at different stages of COVID-19 are rare. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify factors or biomarkers for the development of severe COVID-19 that could be useful in clinical practice. Age, male gender, chronic respiratory diseases, abnormal laboratory parameters and chest CT changes may be risk factors for severe patients compared with non-severe patients with COVID-19. These findings provide guidance to health professionals with early identification of severe COVID-19 patients, transportation to specialised care and initiate appropriate supportive treatment.
Conclusion
The evidence currently support that development of severe COVID-19 cases is significantly associated with older age, male gender, with a combination of chronic diseases, laboratory and pulmonary CT abnormalities. These findings offer guidance for a wide spectrum of clinicians to early identify severe COVID-19 patients, transport to specialised centres, and initiate appropriate treatment. Furthermore, many studies with a broad geographic scope and prospective observation as well as a longer follow-up, involving more comprehensive features and biomarkers are needed.
Supplementary Material
Funding Statement
Thanks to the support from the Liaoning Revitalisation Talents Programme [XLYC1807082], Shenyang Young and Middle-aged Science and Technology Innovation Talent Support Programme [RC190146] and Liaoning Provincial Department of science and technology emergency project.
Ethical approval
Overall ethical approval was not required as this study did not require use of patient identifiers.
Disclosure statement
We declare no competing interests.
Data availability statement
Authors of included studies should be contacted individually regarding requests to share individual patient data.
References
- 1.Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13)1199–1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223)497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223)507–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu Z, McGoogan JM.. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13)1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goh KJ, Choong MC, Cheong EH, et al. Rapid progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: review of current understanding of critical illness from COVID-19 infection. Ann Acad Med 2020;49(1)1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xie J, Tong Z, Guan X, et al. Critical care crisis and some recommendations during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5)837–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN.. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun . 2020;109:102433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cao J, Hu X, Cheng W, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 18 patients with corona virus disease 2019 in intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6)1298–1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020;75(7)1730–1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9)603–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.DerSimonian R, Laird N.. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A)139–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu C, Jiang Z, Shao C, et al. Preliminary study of the relationship between novel coronavirus pneumonia and liver function damage: a multicenter study. Chin J Hepatol. 2020;28(2):107–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229)1054–1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang S, Li J, Zhou W, et al. The analysis of clinical characteristics of 34 novel coronavirus pneumonia cases in Ningxia Hui autonomous region. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2020;43:E037–E37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu YH, Dong JH, An WM, et al. Clinical and computed tomographic imaging features of novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 2020;80(4)394–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu M, Li M, Zhan W, et al. Clinical analysis of 23 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in Xinyang City, Henan Province. Chin Crit Care Med. 2020;32(2):E010–E10. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiong J, Jiang WL, Zhou Q, et al. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis in 89 cases of COVID-2019. Med J Wuhan Univ. 2020;41(04):542–546. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xiang TX, Liu JM, Xu F, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics of 49 patients with Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia in Jiangxi province. Chinese J Respir Critical Care Med. 2020;19(2)1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wen K, Li W, Zhang D, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 46 newly-admitted coronavirus disease 2019 cases in Beijing. Chin J Infect Dis. 2020;38:E011–E11. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Z, Yang B, Li Q, et al. Clinical features of 69 cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis Official Publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020. 71(15):769-777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang R, Xie L, Du P, et al. Clinical characteristics of 96 hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Chin J Respir Critical Care Med. 2020;19(02)144–147. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Jama. 2020;323(11)1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wan Q, Shi A, He T, et al. Analysis of clinical features of 153 patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia in Chongqing. Chin J Clin Infect Dis. 2020;13:E008–E08. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tian S, Hu N, Lou J, et al. Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing. J Infect. 2020;80(4)401–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tang G, Li C, Liu X, et al. Clinical and CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019. Chin J Respir Critical Care Med. 2020;19(02)161–165. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen C, Chen C, Yan J, et al. Analysis of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 and association between concomitant cardiovascular diseases and severity of COVID-19. Chin J Cardiol. 2020;48:E008–E08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fang D, Ma J, Guan J, et al. Manifestations of Digestive system in hospitalized patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-center, descriptive study. Chin J Dig. 2020;40:E005–E05. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li D, Liu H, Wang Y, et al. Clinical features of 30 cases with novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Infect Dis. 2020;28:E018–E18. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu JZ, Chen CW, Xia S.. 15 Clinical analysis of new crown virus pbeumonia. Henan J Prevent Med. 2020;31(03)161–164. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cheng KB, Wei M, Wu CM, et al. Clinical characteristics of 463 patients with common and severe type coronavirus disease 2019. Shanghai Med J. 2020;0:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hou KK, Zhang NTL, Zhou M, et al. CT features of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in different stages and its correlation with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and T lymphocyte subsets. Radiol Practice. 2020;35(03)272–276. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li K, Wu J, Wu F, et al. The clinical and chest CT features associated with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia. Invest Radiol. 2020;55(6):327–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen L, Liu H, Liu W, et al. Analysis of clinical features of 29 patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2020;43(03):203–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang L, Han R, Yu P, et al. A correlation study ofCT and clinical features of different clinical types of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Radiol. 2020;54:E003–E03. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu M, He P, Liu H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 30 medical workers infected with new coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2020;43(03):209–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen S, Wu Juan J, Li Zhi M, et al. Clinical features of 109 cases of novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Infect Dis. 2020;38:E015–E15. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu W, Tao ZW, Lei W, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9)1032-1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen W, Xu L, Zhang Q, et al. Clinical characteristic of 91 novel coronavirus pneumonia patients in jinmen first people's hospital. J Inner Mongolia Med Univ. 2020;42(02):117–124. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li X, Wang H, Zhu J, et al. Imaging dynamic observation of COVID-19 patients cured by imported coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Radiol. 2020;54:E012–E12. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fang XW, Yang Q, Yang TU, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of 79 patients with COVID-19. Chin Pharmacol Bulletin. 2020;36(04)453-459. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shi Y, Ou J, Chen X, et al. Expressions of multiple inflammation markers in the patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia and their clinical values. Chin J Lab Med. 2020;43:E013–E13. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Deng Y, Liu W, Liu K, et al. Clinical characteristics of fatal and recovered cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study. Chin Med J. 2020;133(11)1261–1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Peng Y, Meng K, Guan H, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 112 cardiovascular disease patients infected by 2019-nCoV. Chin J Cardiol. 2020;48:E004–E04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gao W, Yang X, Zheng X, et al. Clinical characteristic of 90 patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a Grade-A hospital in Beijing. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch. 2020;41(3)1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dong L, Ma X, Lyu X, et al. Radiological findings of novel coronavirus pneumonia patients with different clinical type. J Capital Med Univ. 2020;41(02):283-289. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shi Y, Yu X, Zhao H, et al. Host susceptibility to severe COVID-19 and establishment of a host risk score: findings of 487 cases outside Wuhan. Crit Care. 2020;24(1)108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ling Y, Lin Y, Qian Z, et al. Clinical analysis of risk factors for severe patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. Chin J Infect Dis. 2020;38:E023–E23. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ. 2020;368:m1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Han H, Yang L, Liu R, et al. Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(7):1116–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS.. Coronavirus infections-more than just the common cold. JAMA. 2020;323(8)707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18)1708–1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mertz D, Kim TH, Johnstone J, et al. Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Greenland JR, Michelow MD, Wang L, et al. COVID-19 infection: implications for perioperative and critical care physicians. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6):1346–1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(7)934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wan S, Xiang Y, Fang W, et al. Clinical features and treatment of COVID-19 patients in Northeast Chongqing. J Med Virol. 2020;92(7)797–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5)475–481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu W, Tao ZW, Wang L, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9)1032–1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, et al. Time Course of Lung Changes On Chest CT During Recovery From 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Radiology. 2020;295(3)715–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sun P, Qie S, Liu Z, et al. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A single arm meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6)612–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li LQ, Huang T, Wang YQ, et al. COVID-19 patients' clinical characteristics, discharge rate, and fatality rate of meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):577–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in the novel Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:91–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Emami A, Javanmardi F, Pirbonyeh N, et al. Prevalence of underlying diseases in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1)e35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM.. Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;506:145–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lippi G, Plebani M.. Procalcitonin in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;505:190–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bauchner H, Golub RM, Zylke J.. Editorial concern-possible reporting of the same patients with COVID-19 in different reports. JAMA. 2020;323(13)1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Authors of included studies should be contacted individually regarding requests to share individual patient data.