Correction to: Genome Biol 21, 34 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-1947-1
Following publication of the original paper [1], the authors have reported several typographical and linguistic errors in the new Candidatus names presented in Additional file 5: Dataset S4. In addition, the presentation of the names without full protologues has precluded their registration in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, in line with the recommendations of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. The original Additional File 5 has therefore been replaced by Additional File 5A, which presents Dataset S4 with corrected names, and by Additional File 5B, which contains protologues for the new Candidatus names.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 5 A: Clustering of samples at 60% AAI to form genus clusters. Novel genera were defined as clusters of MAGs at 60% AAI which were not assigned a genus by GTDB-Tk. B: Protologues for the new Candidatus names.
Reference
- 1.Glendinning L, Stewart RD, Pallen MJ, et al. Assembly of hundreds of novel bacterial genomes from the chicken caecum. Genome Biol. 2020;21:34. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-1947-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 5 A: Clustering of samples at 60% AAI to form genus clusters. Novel genera were defined as clusters of MAGs at 60% AAI which were not assigned a genus by GTDB-Tk. B: Protologues for the new Candidatus names.