Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Feb 2;15(2):e0008596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008596

Echis carinatus snake venom metalloprotease-induced toxicities in mice: Therapeutic intervention by a repurposed drug, Tetraethyl thiuram disulfide (Disulfiram)

Gotravalli V Rudresha 1, Amog P Urs 2, Vaddarahally N Manjuprasanna 1, Mallanayakanakatte D Milan Gowda 1, Krishnegowda Jayachandra 1, Rajesh Rajaiah 3,*, Bannikuppe S Vishwanath 1,3,*
Editor: Stuart Robert Ainsworth4
PMCID: PMC7880489  PMID: 33529194

Abstract

Echis carinatus (EC) is known as saw-scaled viper and it is endemic to the Indian subcontinent. Envenoming by EC represents a major cause of snakebite mortality and morbidity in the Indian subcontinent. Zinc (Zn++) dependent snake venom metalloproteases (SVMPs) present in Echis carinatus venom (ECV) is well known to cause systemic hemorrhage and coagulopathy in experimental animals. An earlier report has shown that ECV activates neutrophils and releases neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) that blocks blood vessels leading to severe tissue necrosis. However, the direct involvement of SVMPs in the release of NETs is not clear. Here, we investigated the direct involvement of EC SVMPs in observed pathological symptoms in a preclinical setup using specific Zn++ metal chelator, Tetraethyl thiuram disulfide (TTD)/disulfiram. TTD potently antagonizes the activity of SVMPs-mediated ECM protein degradation in vitro and skin hemorrhage in mice. In addition, TTD protected mice from ECV-induced footpad tissue necrosis by reduced expression of citrullinated H3 (citH3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in footpad tissue. TTD also neutralized ECV-induced systemic hemorrhage and conferred protection against lethality in mice. Moreover, TTD inhibited ECV-induced NETosis in human neutrophils and decreased the expression of peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD) 4, citH3, MPO, and p-ERK. Further, we demonstrated that ECV-induced NETosis and tissue necrosis are mediated via PAR-1-ERK axis. Overall, our results provide an insight into SVMPs-induced toxicities and the promising protective efficacy of TTD can be extrapolated to treat severe tissue necrosis complementing anti-snake venom (ASV).

Author summary

India has highest incidence of deaths due to snakebite in the world. Echis carinatus (EC) is known as saw-scaled viper and its bite causes major mortality and morbidity in the Indian subcontinent. The abundant presence of zinc (Zn++) metalloproteases in Echis carinatus venom (ECV) is responsible for local tissue necrosis. An earlier report has shown that ECV activates neutrophils and leads to NETosis that blocks blood vessels leading to tissue necrosis. However, the toxin in ECV responsible for NETosis has not addressed. Here we investigated the Echis carinatus venom metalloproteases (ECVMPs) are responsible for NETosis and its associated tissue necrosis using Zn++ specific chelator, Tetraethyl thiuram disulfide (TTD). TTD inhibited ECVMPs-induced skin hemorrhage and footpad tissue necrosis by reduced expression of citrullinated H3 (citH3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in mice footpad tissue. TTD also neutralized ECV-induced systemic hemorrhage and conferred protection against lethality in mice. Moreover, TTD inhibited ECV-induced NETosis in human neutrophils and decreased the expression of p-ERK and NETosis markers. Further, we demonstrated that ECV-induced NETosis and tissue necrosis is mediated via PAR-1-ERK axis. Overall, our results provide an insight into SVMPs-induced toxicities and the promising protective efficacy of TTD can be extrapolated to treat severe tissue necrosis complementing anti-snake venom (ASV).

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, snakebite is a global public health problem and a neglected tropical disease [1,2]. Snakebites are often associated with severe local manifestations including inflammation, hemorrhage, blistering, skin damage, coagulopathy and progressive tissue necrosis at the bitten site [3,4]. These local manifestations are nevertheless pathological condition, caused by a mixture of toxins rather than a single toxin present in the venom [4]. Unfortunately, treatment of snake envenomation-induced progressive tissue necrosis persists even after anti-snake venom (ASV) administration [5,6]. Hence, treating progressive tissue necrosis is still a challenging issue for the existing strategies of snakebite management. In addition, studies on progressive tissue necrosis induced by viper bite have clearly revealed the direct involvement of metzincin family matrix-degrading snake venom metalloproteases (SVMPs) [4,7,8] and hyaluronidases (SVHYs) [9,10].

E. carinatus (EC) also known as a saw-scaled viper is the only Echis species found in India [11]. Echis bite is responsible for 10–20% mortality and causes severe local manifestations, due to rich in zinc (Zn++) dependent SVMPs [1214]. In addition, ECV activates neutrophils and releases their nuclear and granular contents to the extracellular space leading to neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs); this process is described as NETosis [15]. A previous study showed that NETs released from neutrophils entrap the venom toxins and results in blockage of blood vessels leading to tissue necrosis [15]. However, the venom toxin/s responsible for NETs formation and cellular mechanism involved is unclear.

Several studies have demonstrated that SVMPs of ECV are known to contribute to the pathophysiology by causing degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins resulting in hemorrhage at the site of injection [4,8,16]. Multiple scientific reports have demonstrated the direct involvement of SVMPs in disrupting the tissue architecture by degrading ECM proteins [7,17,18]. Hemorrhagic SVMPs act at the basement membrane and disrupt the capillary wall that results in extravasation [7,17,19]. Further experimental evidence suggests that the onset of micro-vessel damage is mediated by the degradation of type IV collagen by the action of SVMPs [7,19]. SVMPs have resemblance in catalytic site architecture and structural domains with metzincin family proteases such as MMPs and ADAMs [20]. A few reports showed the activation of MAPKs by MMPs via protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 [21]. Since SVMPs are catalytically related to MMPs, we hypothesized that EC SVMPs-induce NETosis and intracellular signaling cascade via PAR-1. Here, we have demonstrated that EC SVMPs-induced NETosis is mediated via PAR-1-ERK signaling axis, responsible for severe tissue necrosis.

Previously, we have shown the neutralizing abilities of Zn++ specific chelators against the snake venom-induced progressive tissue damage [22]. Very recently, Albulescu et al. demonstrated the therapeutic intervention of repurposed drug, 2, 3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid for hemotoxic snakebite [23]. Chelating agents are essential in restoring the physiological levels of MMPs, as their dysregulated activity reflects in debilitating conditions such as cancer and arthritis [24]. Many pharmacologically approved chelating agents have been extensively studied for inhibition of SVMPs [25,26]. Those molecules are failed to reach the clinical trial, because of their non-specific chelation property [27]. Consequently, a high affinity membrane permeable specific Zn++ chelator, Antabuse drug, Tetraethyl thiuram disulfide (TTD)/disulfiram repurposed as therapeutic for ECV-induced toxicities in preclinical setup and compared with PLA2 and hyaluronidase inhibitors, aristolochic acid (AA) and silymarin (SLN), respectively.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Adult Swiss albino mice (6 to 8-week-old female) weighing 20–25 g were obtained from the Central Animal House Facility, Department of Studies in Zoology, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India. The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India (Approval number: UOM/IAEC/20/2016). During all experiments, animal care and handling were in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA).

Human blood was drawn from the antecubital veins of healthy adult volunteers who were provided with written informed consent. All the experiments were approved by the Institutional Human Ethical Committee, University of Mysore, Mysuru, India (Approval number: IHEC-UOM No. 120 Ph.D/2015-16), and conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines.

Venom

Lyophilized powder of Echis carinatus venom (ECV) was purchased from Irula Snake-Catchers Co-operative Society Ltd., (Chennai, India). The required amount of venom was re-dissolved in PBS and centrifuged at 9000 g for 10 min to remove debris. The protein content of venom was determined according to the method of Lowry et al. [28].

Chemicals and reagents

Tetraethyl thiuram (TTD), aristolochic acid (AA), silymarin (SLN), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), porcine skin gelatin, collagen-I/IV, laminin, fibronectin, Hoechst stain, DNase 1, ficoll-paque, dextran and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Bangalore, India). BSA, ethanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; HPLC grade), Tween-20 and Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) were purchased from HiMediaLaboratories, Pvt. Ltd. (Mumbai, India). SCH79797 (PAR-1 antagonist) and GB-83 (PAR-2 antagonist) were purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Michigan, USA). U0126 (MEK 1/2 inhibitor), antibodies against p-ERK, β-actin and cell lysis buffer were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Massachusetts, USA). HRP tagged anti-rabbit IgG and anti-mouse IgG were procured from Jackson ImmunoResearch (Philadelphia, USA). The rabbit polyclonal anti-citH3, rabbit polyclonal anti-H3, mouse monoclonal anti-myeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) and anti-PAD4 were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). All other chemicals and reagents used in this study are analytical grade.

PLA2 activity

ECV PLA2 activity was performed according to the method of Patriarca et al. with some modifications [29]. E. coli was labeled with 14C-oleate, autoclaved and used to measure PLA2 activity. ECV (0–50 μg) was added into a total reaction volume of 350 μl containing 5 mM CaCl2, 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) and 14C-oleate labeled E. coli cells (3.18×109) (corresponds to 10,000 cpm or 60 nmol lipid phosphorus) and incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 100 μl of 2N HCl and 100 μl of fatty acid free BSA (100 mg/ml). The tubes were vortexed, centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min and aliquot (140 μl) of supernatant was mixed with scintillation cocktail. The enzyme activity was determined by quantifying the free 14C-oleate released using Packard scintillation analyzer and expressed as nmols of free fatty acid released/min/mg of protein at 37°C. For inhibition studies, similar reactions were carried out after pre-incubating 50 μg ECV with various concentrations of AA, SLN and TTD for 5 min at 37°C. Inhibition was expressed as a percentage.

Hyaluronidase activity

Hyaluronidase activity of ECV was assayed according to the method of Reissig et al. with some modifications [30]. The reaction mixture (350 μl in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer pH 5.5 with 0.15 M NaCl) containing ECV (0–100 μg) incubated separately with HA (50 μg) at 37°C for 2½ h. After incubation, the reaction mixture was heated in a water bath for 5 min to stop the reaction and cooled to room temperature. Sodium tetraborate (50 μl; 0.8 M; pH 9.2) buffer was added followed by heating in a boiling water bath for 3 min. After cooling to room temperature, 1.5 ml of coloring reagent p-DMAB (1% in 9,1 ratio of glacial acetic acid and HCl) was added and incubated for 20 min at 37°C and centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min to remove turbidity, the absorbance of clear supernatant was measured at 585 nm. Activity was expressed as μmol of NAG released/min/mg protein. For inhibition studies, hyaluronidase activity was determined after pre-incubating 100 μg ECV with various concentrations of AA, SLN and TTD for 5 min at 37°C. Inhibition was expressed as a percentage.

Caseinolytic activity

Proteolytic activity of ECV was assayed according to the method of Murata et al. with suitable modifications [31]. Fat free casein 0.4 ml (2%; 0.2 M Tris-HCl buffer; pH 8.5) was incubated with ECV (0–25 μg) and final volume make up to 1 ml with 0.2 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), incubated at 37°C for 2½ h. The reaction was stopped by adding 1.5 ml of 0.44 M TCA and allowed to stand for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 1,500 g for 15 min and 1.0 ml supernatant was mixed with 2.5 ml of 0.4 M sodium carbonate and 0.5 ml of 1:2 diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagents. The colour developed was read at 660 nm. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to increase an absorbance of 0.01 at 660 nm/h at 37°C. For inhibition studies, similar reactions were performed after pre-incubating 25 μg of venom with various concentrations of AA, SLN and TTD for 5 min at 37°C. The proteolytic activity of ECV in the absence of inhibitors was considered as 100%. Inhibition was expressed as a percentage.

Gelatinolytic activity

The gelatinolytic activity was performed by substrate gel assay as described by Heussen and Dowdle, with some modifications [32]. ECV, 5 μg was loaded onto a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE) impregnated with 0.08% of gelatinand electrophoresis was carried out under non-reducing condition at a 100 V for 2 h. After electrophoresis, SDS was removed by incubating gel with 2.5% Triton X-100 for 1 h, followed by an extensive wash with distilled water. The gel was incubated overnight at 37°C in incubation buffer, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6 containing 0.9% NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 10 mM ZnCl2. The gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue-G250 (CBB-G250) and a clear zone indicates the gelatinolytic activity of ECV. For inhibition studies ECV was pre-incubated with different concentrations of TTD (1, 5, 10 and 20 mM), AA (10 and 20 mM) and SLN (10 and 20 mM) for 5 min at 37°C and assay was performed as described above.

ECM protein hydrolyzing activity

ECM protein hydrolyzing activity was performed according to the method of Baramova et al. with slight modifications [33]. ECM proteins, collagen type-I/IV, laminin and fibronectin (50 μg each) were incubated with 5 μg of ECV, separately in a total reaction volume of 40 μl with Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM; pH 7.6) at 37°C for 3 h. The reaction was terminated by adding 20 μl of reducing sample buffer (4% SDS, 6% β-mercaptoethanol and 1 M urea) and boiled for 5 min. An aliquot of 40 μl of this sample was loaded onto 7.5% SDS-PAGE and electrophoresis was carried out at 100 V for 2 h. After electrophoresis the cleavage pattern of ECM proteins was visualized by staining with CBB-G250. For inhibition studies, similar experiments were carried out by pre-incubating ECV with different concentrations of TTD (1, 5, 10 and 20 mM), AA (10 and 20 mM) and SLN (10 and 20 mM) for 5 min at 37°C and electrophoresed as described above.

ECV-induced skin hemorrhage in mice

Hemorrhagic activity was performed as described by Kondo et al. with suitable modifications [34]. Mice were injected (n = 3; i.d.) with 5 μg of ECV and control mice received saline. After 2½ h, mice were sacrificed using pentobarbitone (30 mg/kg; i.p.) and the inner dorsal surface of the skin was surgically removed and photographed, and the hemorrhagic spot was quantitated using a graph sheet. For neutralization studies, 5 μg of ECV was pre-incubated with various doses of TTD (5, 10 and 20 mM) for 5 min at 37°C and administered to the mice skin (i.d.). For challenge studies, various doses of TTD (13.25, 26.5 and 53 μg), AA (20 and 40 μg) and SLN (15 and 30 μg) were injected 15 min post ECV injection. Neutralization of hemorrhagic activity was measured in terms of decreased area of the hemorrhagic spot in comparison to ECV-induced hemorrhagic area.

ECV-induced mice footpad tissue necrosis

ECV-induced mice footpad tissue necrosis was performed as described by Rudresha et al. with suitable modifications [35]. Mice were anesthetized using pentobarbitone (30 mg/kg; i.p.) and ECV (LD50; 2.21 mg/kg body weight) was administered to the mice footpad (n = 5; Intraplantar injection). The time for onset of footpad injuries was recorded for each mouse. The severity of the injury was visually judged and scored based on a 5-point scale; 0-no injury, 1-edema with mild hemorrhage, 2-edema with severe hemorrhage causing discoloration of the footpad, 3-edema with severe hemorrhage and necrosis, 4-severe hemorrhage and necrotized footpad, 5-necrotized little toe detached from limb. The footpad injury observations were recorded every day for 8 days after venom injection. To evaluate the protection of ECV-induced tissue necrosis, TTD (2.15 mg/kg) was pre-incubated with ECV (2.21 mg/kg) for 5 min at 37°C and administered to the mice footpad. For challenge studies, TTD (2.15 mg/kg) was administered to the venom injection site 30 min post venom injection. Previously, Katkar et al. showed that DNase 1 administration accelerates the healing of ECV-induced chronic wounds by degrading the deposited NETs. Hence, DNase 1 (100 U) was used as a positive control [15].

To assess the effect of SCH79797 (PAR-1 antagonist) on ECV-induced footpad tissue necrosis, SCH79797 (1.5 mg/kg) was administered to the mice footpad 15 min before to the ECV (½LD50; 1.10 mg/kg; n = 3) injection. The onset of footpad injuries was recorded as described above.

Histopathological studies

Mice were sacrificed using pentobarbitone (30 mg/kg; i.p.) and footpad tissues were excised and fixed for 24 h in Bouin’s fixative (picric acid: formaldehyde: glacial acetic acid, 30:10:2 v/v), dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol and embedded in paraffin. The tissues were sectioned into 4 μm thick using a microtome (R. Jung AG, Germany). Tissue sections were processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as described by Svensson et al. with suitable modifications [36] and photographed using Axio Imager A2 microscope with LED—Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany).

ECV-induced mortality and systemic hemorrhage in mice

Lethal toxicity of ECV was determined according to the method of Meier and Theakston, with some modifications [37]. To determine the anti-venom potential of TTD in preventive regimen we followed our previous lethality study [38]. Briefly, ECV (1½ LD50; 3.31 mg/kg; n = 5) was pre-incubated with TTD (2.15 mg/kg) or effective dose ASV (ED ASV), separately for 5 min at 37°C and injected intra peritoneally (i.p.) to mice. For challenge studies, TTD (2.15 mg/kg) or ED ASV (mg anti-venom per mg venom) was injected 30 min post of venom administration (i.p.). The signs of toxicities were observed up to 24 h and survival time was recorded. For systemic hemorrhage and bleeding studies, mice received ECV (LD50; 2.21 mg/kg; n = 5; i.p.) and challenged with TTD (2.15 mg/kg; i.p.) or ED ASV, 30 min post ECV injection. After 3 h mice were sacrificed using pentobarbitone (30 mg/kg; i.p.) and peritoneal cavity was observed for symptoms and photographed.

Isolation of neutrophils from human blood

Human neutrophils were isolated from healthy volunteers blood, according to the method of Halverson et al. with slight modifications [39]. The blood was collected and mixed with acid citrate dextrose in a 5:1 volumetric ratio, followed by dextran sedimentation and hypotonic lysis to remove red blood cells. The cell pellet was suspended in 2 ml of PBS and subjected to density gradient centrifugation at 210 g using ficoll-paque for 30 min at 4°C. The neutrophils settled at the bottom as a cell pellet were washed twice with PBS and centrifuged at 210 g and re-suspended in HBSS. The cells were counted using the Neubauer hemocytometer and the required cell density was adjusted using HBSS.

Analysis of NET formation and its markers in human neutrophils

NETs formation was analyzed using Hoechst stain according to the method of Katkar et al. with suitable modifications [15]. Human neutrophils (2×105/ml) were seeded on 13 mm round coverslips placed in 12 well plates in 500 μl of HBSS-1 and allowed cells to adhere to the coverslips for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. Then, the cells were stimulated with different concentrations of ECV (5, 10, 25 and 50 μg/ml) for 2½ h. After incubation, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with Hoechst stain (1:10,000) for 15 min. Cells were analyzed for NETs formation and images were acquired on a BA410 fluorescence microscope (Motic) attached to a DS-Qi2 monochrome CMOS sensor camera. The NETs percentage was calculated in 5 non-overlapping fields per coverslip. For inhibition studies, similar experiments were carried out by pre-incubating ECV (25 μg) with different concentrations of TTD (1, 5, 10 and 20 mM), AA (10 and 20 mM) and SLN (10 and 20 mM) for 5 min at 37°C and NETs percentage was calculated as described above.

For the analysis of ECV-induced citH3, PAD4 and MPO expression, neutrophils were treated with ECV (25 μg) that was pre-treated with various concentrations of TTD (1, 5, 10 and 20 mM), AA (10 and 20 mM) and SLN (10 and 20 mM) at 37°C for 5 min. After 2½ h, neutrophils were washed and lysed with cell lysis buffer containing PMSF and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and stored at -20°C overnight. Lysates were centrifuged at 9000 g for 10 min and tested for the expression of protein using Western blotting.

To test the effect of pharmacological inhibitors on ECV-induced NETs and its markers, neutrophils were pre-sensitized without or with U0126 (MEK 1/2 inhibitor), SCH79797 (PAR-1antagonist) and GB-83 (PAR-2 antagonist) for 15 min. Then, neutrophils were stimulated with 25 μg of ECV for 2½ h at 37°C, and NETs were quantitated using Hoechst stain. Cell lysates were used to test the expression of citH3, PAD4, MPO and ERK activation using Western blotting.

Western blotting

Mice were sacrificed using anesthesia pentobarbitone (30 mg/kg; i.p.) and ECV injected mice footpads were excised from respective days 1 to 8 and stored at -20°C. The excised tissue samples were sonicated for 30 seconds on ice bath (five passes of 10 seconds) with a 3.0 mm probe sonicator in cold cell lysis buffer containing (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM beta-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 μg/ml leupeptin) (Cell Signaling Technology) and supplemented with PMSF and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich). Tissue homogenates were centrifuged at 9000 g for 10 min and the supernatant was used for protein quantification. Western blotting was performed as described by Rajaiah et al. with suitable modifications [40]. Briefly, an equal amount of proteins (25 μg) with Laemmli buffer was loaded on to SDS-PAGE and electrophoresis were carried out at 100 V for 2 h. After electrophoresis proteins were electro-blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes at 4°C for 90 min. After blocking for 2 h in TBST (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5 with 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% Tween-20) containing 5% BSA, membranes were probed against anti-citH3 (1:1000) or anti-PAD4 (1:2000) or anti-MPO (1:1000) or anti-p-ERK (1:1000) antibodies overnight at 4°C according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam, UK and Massachusetts, USA). Membranes were washed extensively (4x) using TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit/mouse IgG (1:10,000) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate for visualization (Alliance 2.7, Uvitec) and bands were quantitated using Image J software. H3 and β-actin were used as the loading control.

Statistics

Data represented as the mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used to analyze more than two groups using Graph Pad Prism version 5.03 (La Jolla, USA). The comparison between the groups was considered significant if *p< 0.05.

Results

TTD inhibits ECV-induced proteolytic activity, ECM protein degradation and hemorrhage

We have tested the inhibitory efficacy of an Antabuse drug, TTD with chelating property on ECV-induced proteolytic activity, ECM protein degradation and hemorrhage in mice and compared with pharmacological inhibitors of PLA2 (AA) and hyaluronidase (SLN). To begin with, the effect of TTD on ECV-induced proteolytic activity was demonstrated by casein and gelatin as substrate. TTD inhibited ECV-induced caseinolytic and gelatinolytic activity in a concentration-dependent manner and the IC50 concentration of caseinolytic activity was found to be 3 mM (Fig 1A and 1B and S1C and S3A Figs). In addition, TTD also inhibited ECV-induced degradation of the ECM proteins, collagen, laminin and fibronectin in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 1C–1F). Furthermore, TTD was tested for its action on ECV-induced hemorrhage in mice skin in both pre-incubation and challenging studies. TTD efficiently neutralized ECV-induced hemorrhagic activity in pre-incubation and 30 min post ECV injection (Fig 1G and 1H and S3B and S3C Fig). PLA2 and hyaluronidase inhibitors, AA and SLN inhibited ECV-induced PLA2 and hyaluronidase activities, respectively (S1A and S1B Fig). On the other hand, both AA and SLN failed to inhibit ECV-induced ECM protein degradation (S2A–S2D Fig) and hemorrhagic activity in mice (S2E and S2F Fig).

Fig 1. Effect of TTD on ECV-induced ECM protein degradation in vitro and hemorrhage in mice.

Fig 1

ECV was pre-incubated without or with various concentrations of TTD at 37°C for 5 min and subjected for gelatinolytic, collagenolytic, laminin and fibronectin hydrolyzing activity. The gelatinolytic activity was performed by gelatin zymogram using 10% gel impregnated with 0.08% gelatin. Clear zones in the gel indicate the hydrolysis of gelatin by ECV (A). The area of gelatinolytic activity was quantitated using a graph sheet represented as area (mm2) (B). The data represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + TTD. For collagen, laminin and fibronectin degradation analysis, the pre-incubated reaction mixture of ECV and TTD was incubated with 50 μg of collagen (Col) type I (C), type IV (D), laminin (Lam) (E) and fibronectin (Fib) (F) for 3 h at 37°C. The hydrolyzing pattern was analyzed using 7.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by staining with CBB-G250. Data are representative of two independent experiments. For skin hemorrhage, mice were injected (n = 3; i.d.) with 5 μg of ECV followed by the injection of different concentrations of TTD post 30 min at the site of ECV injection. After 180 min, dorsal patches of mice skin were photographed (G) and the hemorrhagic area was measured using graph sheets represented as area (mm2) (H). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

TTD protects ECV-induced mice footpad tissue necrosis with decreased expression of citrullinated H3 (citH3)/myeloperoxidase (MPO) and histopathological changes

With promising results of in vitro inhibition of ECV-induced ECM proteins degradation and murine skin hemorrhage, TTD was tested for the neutralization of ECV-induced tissue necrosis using mice footpad model. ECV injection to mice footpad resulted in progressive tissue necrosis that leads to the detachment of little toe from limb between 6–8 days. TTD administration neutralizes ECV-induced tissue necrosis and prevented the loss of little toe and, was able to restore the normal footpad morphology both in pre-incubation and challenging studies (Fig 2A and 2B and S3D and S3E Fig). Moreover, recently Katkar et al. reported that infiltrated neutrophils to the site of venom injection release chromatin content to the extracellular space as NETs that is responsible for local tissue necrosis [15]. Furthermore, Katkar et al. and Rudresha et al. demonstrated that the intervention of DNase 1 and plant DNase at a right time protected ECV-induced tissue necrosis [15,41]. In addition, the excessive production of MPO and citH3 by the action of PAD4 has shown to be crucial for ECV-induced local tissue damage [15]. Similar to the previous study, ECV induced the expression of MPO and citH3, and it was efficiently inhibited by TTD (Fig 2C–2E). The inhibitory action of TTD on ECV-induced mice footpad necrosis and the expression of MPO and citH3 are more efficient and comparable with DNase 1 (Fig 2). In addition, the protective efficacy of TTD on ECV-induced footpad tissue necrosis was confirmed by histopathological studies using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Mice that received ECV alone showed extensive tissue damage. TTD treatment protects the ECV-induced histopathological changes (S4 Fig).

Fig 2. Neutralization of ECV-induced mice footpad tissue necrosis by TTD.

Fig 2

Mice footpads were injected with ECV (LD50; 2.21 mg/kg; n = 5). After 30 min, mice received either TTD or DNase 1 at the site of venom injection and footpads were photographed from day 1 to day 8 (A). Red arrow indicates edema and black arrow indicates tissue necrosis. ECV-induced footpad injury was measured manually on a scale of 1 to 5 (B). The level of ECV-induced citH3 and MPO in mouse footpad tissue in the absence or presence of either TTD or DNase 1 was analyzed by Western blotting (C) and quantitated using H3 and β-actin as a loading control for citH3 (D) and MPO (E), respectively. The data represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + TTD and ECV versus ECV + DNase 1.

TTD protects mice from ECV-induced lethality and neutralizes systemic hemorrhage

In addition to the induction of progressive tissue necrosis, ECV is lethal when injected at 3.31 mg/kg body weight (1½LD50), and the average survival time is approximately 8 ± 2 h. Since TTD efficiently neutralized ECV-induced tissue necrosis and hemorrhage, its effect on ECV-induced mortality in mice was tested. TTD neutralized ECV-induced lethality and protected mice in both pre-incubation (100% survival—two independent experiments with 5 animals in each group) and challenge then treat (30 min post venom injection) (four of five animals survived—two independent experiments with 5 animals in each group) (Fig 3A and 3B). The protective effect of TTD was comparable to ED ASV (mg anti-venom per mg venom) both in pre-incubation and therapeutic regimens (Fig 3A and 3B). ECV is well-known for hemotoxic effect and its envenomation makes blood in-coagulable that leads to the systemic bleeding with disseminated intravascular coagulation [42]. In fact, ECV injection to mouse peritoneum caused severe bleeding and extravasation throughout the peritoneum (Fig 3C). As TTD protected mice from ECV-induced lethality, it neutralized ECV-induced bleeding in peritoneum even after 30 min post ECV injection and it was comparable with ED ASV as shown in Fig 3C. This indicates that TTD is a potential drug candidate that complements ASV during EC bite.

Fig 3. Protection of mice against ECV-induced mortality and systemic hemorrhage by TTD.

Fig 3

A lethal dose of ECV (1½LD50; 3.31 mg/kg) was pre-treated with TTD (2.15 mg/kg) or an effective dose of anti-snake venom (ED ASV) for 5 min at 37°C and injected (n = 5; i.p.) to mice. The time taken for mice mortality was recorded for 24 h and graph plotted as percent survival against the time of death (A). In the treatment model, mice received either TTD (2.15 mg/kg) or ED ASV, 30 min post ECV injection (i.p.) and the survival time was recorded for 24 h (B). For the neutralization of systemic hemorrhage, mice received (n = 5; i.p.) various concentrations of either TTD or ED ASV, 30 min post ECV (LD50; 2.21 mg/kg; i.p.) injection. Mice were sacrificed after 2 h and peritonea were photographed (C). Red arrow indicates the hemorrhage in the peritoneum cavity and black arrow indicated reduced hemorrhage in the peritoneum. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

TTD inhibits ECV-induced NETs formation and activation of intracellular signaling in human neutrophils

Neutrophils are the first line innate immune cells recruited to sites of acute inflammation in response to chemotactic signals produced by injured tissue and tissue-resident macrophages [43,44]. During infection, neutrophils undergo degranulation and ultimately release chromatin as NETs that contribute to the killing of extracellular pathogens [45]. Previously, Setubal et al. demonstrated Bothrops bilineatus venom in the activation of neutrophils and the release of NETs [46]. Recently, Katkar et al. reported the discharged chromatin (NETs) upon ECV treatment is responsible for ECV-induced local tissue necrosis [15]. Similar to the previous reports, we observed ECV-induced chromatin discharge from human neutrophils in a concentration-dependent manner and it was effectively inhibited by TTD (Fig 4A and S5A Fig). On the other hand, the PLA2 and hyaluronidase inhibitors, AA and SLN are failed to inhibit the ECV-induced NETosis (S6A and S6B Fig). Moreover, ECV treated neutrophils showed increased expression of PAD4, citH3, and MPO and activation of ERK (Fig 4B). The importance of PAD4 in DNA de-condensation by citH3 and DNA expulsion in both mouse and human neutrophils is well documented [47]. Furthermore, TTD significantly reduced ECV-induced NETosis and decreased the expression of PAD4, citH3 and MPO as well as activation of ERK in neutrophils (Fig 4A and 4B). TTD is a chelating agent that is known to inhibit SVMPs; therefore, these data clearly suggest that SVMPs are directly involved in the activation of ERK and NETs formation.

Fig 4. Inhibition of ECV-induced NETs formation by TTD.

Fig 4

Human neutrophils were stimulated with ECV (25 μg) pre-incubated (5 min) without or with different concentrations of TTD for 180 min and NETs formation was observed and quantitated (A). ECV-induced citH3, PAD4 and MPO in neutrophil cell lysates were analyzed using Western blotting (B). Bands were quantitated using H3 as loading control for citH3 and β-actin as a loading control for MPO and PAD4 (C). The data represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + TTD.

ECV-induced NETs formation and tissue necrosis via PAR-1-ERK mediated axis

It is well known that MMPs cleave PAR-1 at non-canonical sites, results in the activation of intracellular signaling cascade via MAPKs that leads to a diverse array of physiological functions [21,48]. Since MMPs and SVMPs are having structural homology in their catalytic site, we speculated that EC SVMPs activates ERK and NETs formation through PAR-1. To confirm whether ECV induces NETs formation via the PARs, we used PAR-1 and PAR-2 specific antagonists, SCH79797 and GB-83, respectively. SCH79797 is a selective antagonist of PAR-1 and it does not have any role in the inhibition of venom-induced toxicities by directly acting on ECV unlike TTD. SVMPs present in ECV instantaneously activate PAR-1 in the absence of TTD and it is hard to control SVMPs activated PAR-1 signaling once it is activated. Hence, we have reduced the venom dose and injected SCH79797 before ECV injection. With this, we made an effort to establish the mechanism of SVMPs in the activation of PAR-1 that may have direct/indirect role in ECV-induced toxicities. In fact, ECV activated NETs formation was inhibited in the presence of SCH79797 and not by GB-83, suggesting that ECV-induced NETosis is mediated via PAR-1 in human neutrophils (Fig 5A and 5B).

Fig 5. Effect of selective antagonists of ERK and PARs on ECV-induced NETosis and tissue necrosis.

Fig 5

Neutrophils were pre-sensitized with selective antagonists of ERK (U0126), PAR-1 (SCH79797) and PAR-2 (GB-83) for 15 min, separately. Pre-sensitized neutrophils were stimulated with 25 μg of ECV for 180 min and cells were stained with Hoechst stain. Neutrophils were photographed under a microscope (A) and, NETs were quantitated and represented as percent NETosis (B). The data represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + antagonists. The whole cell lysates were analyzed for the phosphorylated ERK, expression of PAD4 and citH3 using Western blotting (C). The p-ERK and PAD4 bands were quantitated using β-actin as a loading control. The citH3 bands were quantitated using H3 as a loading control. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

Further, ECV-induced expression of PAD4, CitH3 and activation of ERK was inhibited by SCH79797 (Fig 5C). On the other hand, MEK inhibitor, U0126 showed a partial effect on ECV-induced NETs formation and the expression of PAD4 and citH3 (Fig 5C). In support of in vitro results in human neutrophils, PAR-1 antagonist neutralized ECV-induced mice footpad tissue necrosis (Fig 6A and 6B). Overall, these data confirmed the involvement of EC SVMPs-induced tissue necrosis by inducing NETosis and activation of intracellular signaling via PAR-1 (Fig 7).

Fig 6. Effect of the selective antagonist of PAR-1 on ECV-induced tissue necrosis.

Fig 6

Mice footpads (n = 5) were pre-treated without or with PAR-1 antagonist (SCH79797) for 15 min and followed by the injection of ECV (½LD50; 1.10 mg/kg). Mice footpads were photographed from day 1 to day 8 (A) and tissue injury was measured manually on a scale of 1 to 5 (B). Red arrow indicates edema and black arrow indicates tissue necrosis. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

Fig 7. Schematic representation of TTD and pharmacological inhibitors, site of action on ECV-induced toxicities.

Fig 7

ECV-induced PAR-1-mediated ERK activation might be responsible for increased expression of PAD4, histone citrullination and MPO expressions that are accountable for severe tissue necrosis. TTD and pharmacological inhibitors interfere in ECV-induced signaling/tissue necrosis by inhibiting NETosis and chromatin release.

Discussion

Viper bites can induce progressive tissue necrosis that can result in permanent disability in the affected limb or digit [49]. Case reports on snakebite victims suggested that envenomation by hemotoxic venoms including Echis carinatus (EC) induces hematological complications, local pain, bleeding and edema at the bite site. Untreated Echis envenomation may involve multiple organs and the patient may suffer from, hematuria, renal failure, hemorrhage, anemia, hypotension and disseminated intravascular coagulation with capillary leak syndrome [50,51]. The LD50 of EC envenomation is 6.65 mg/kg and an average bite may yield about 40 mg of venom [5254]. Generally, envenomation by EC is associated with a mortality rate of 10–20% if there is no initiation of effective treatment early. The major cause of mortality is due to increased bleeding after envenomation including venom-induced consumption coagulopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation due to the prothrombin/thrombin-like enzymes present in the snake venom [14].

SVMPs are one of the major toxins in most of the viper venoms including ECV and they primarily act on ECM components and are responsible for hemorrhagic activity [7,8,18,19,22]. The progressive tissue necrosis induced by viper bites mainly attributed to SVMPs, particularly P-III class metalloproteases [8]. In addition, SVMPs are hemotoxic in nature and interfere with the hemostatic system in snakebite victims [55]. SVMPs are closely related to a disintegrin and metalloproteinases (ADAMs), thus they are also referred to as snake venom ADAMs [56,57]. SVMPs contains disintegrin-like (D), cysteine-rich (C), metalloproteinase and (M) domain, that harbors putative Zn++ binding sequence and bearing the typical structural features of the metzincin family of MMPs [20,5759]. Alike MMPs, Zn++ on the M-domain of SVMPs plays a crucial role in the catalytic functions [20,57]. Hence, chelation of Zn++ metal ion by specific Zn++chelators rather than non-specific chelator is more effective in the management of local tissue necrosis induced by viper venoms [22]. Since SVMPs are directly responsible for ECV-induced toxicities, the inhibition of SVMPs by TTD would be beneficial to manage ECV-induced toxicities.

TTD was the first drug to treat chronic alcoholism and was approved by the FDA 1951 [60]. Since then, many studies have shown repurposing of TTD to treat diverse types of human malignant tumors including breast cancer, glioblastoma and pancreatic carcinoma [61,62]. TTD has also shown therapeutic potential in treating AIDS and it is found to be beneficial in treating Lyme disease in patients [63,64]. Very recently, the intervention of TTD in normalizing body weight in obese mice has been reported [65]. Besides, TTD has been shown to inhibit MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity by directly interacting with them via a Zn++ chelating mechanism [66]. Several scientific reports suggested that, many small inhibitors or chelators of SVMPs such as batimastat, marimastat, N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis (2-pyridylmethyl) ethane-1,2-diamine and dimercaprol which targets the different classes of SVMPs-induced toxicities [6771]. Some of these inhibitors were less effective as therapeutic regimen where the time lapse between venom and administration of inhibitors is prolonged [72]. Moreover, many small molecules and chelators were focused on interference in Viperinae snake venom-induced coagulopathy and local toxicities [69]. However, our findings highlight the efficacy of TTD in ECV-induced both local and systemic toxicities and, would be better repurposing to complement snakebite management. It has been demonstrated that 80–95% of an oral dose of TTD is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and it requires 1 to 2 h to peak serum concentration. TTD is rapidly distributed in adipose tissue, liver, spleen, adrenal gland and the brain. Prolonged administration of TTD is not known to induce tolerance and it is metabolized to diethyldithiocarbamate and mixed disulfides that are excreted via urine. The unabsorbed content of TTD is excreted in the feces [73,74]. TTD is known to cause hepatitis in 1 in 30,000 patients, which is sometimes fatal. There are rare reports of psychosis and confusional states and peripheral neuropathy and optic neuritis and, these effects were dose dependent. Moreover, TTD interacts with compounds that utilize the cytochrome P450 enzyme system [74,75]. Although the maximum recommended daily dose of TTD is 500 mg orally as an Antabuse [76], the long-term side effects of its use and dosage requirements are still unknown that requires extensive in vivo research before they can be fully supported as a complementary therapy for snakebite management.

Recently, Albulescu et al. showed that 2, 3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid, a derivative of dimercaprol effectively antagonizes the activity of Zn++ dependent SVMPs in vitro and neutralized ECV in mice [23]. Previously, we have reported the inhibitory potential of Zn++ specific chelating agents; N,N,N’,N’-tetrakis (2-pyridylmethyl) ethane-1,2-diamine, diethylene triaminepenta acetic acid, TTD on ECV-induced toxicities [22]. In sight of these, we demonstrated that Zn++ chelating agent, TTD an Antabuse drug can be likely repurposed as a therapeutic candidate in treating ECV-induced toxicities that are mediated by SVMPs. The proficient hydrolysis of the basement membrane by SVMPs surrounding the blood vessels leads to immediate events of hemorrhage at the site of venom injection [18,77]. The progression of hemorrhage resulting in localized myonecrosis is due to extensive degradation of structural proteins and severe inflammation [46,78]. Initially, TTD successfully inhibited ECV-induced degradation of ECM proteins in a concentration-dependent manner and also neutralizes the hemorrhage induced by ECV upon challenging studies (Fig 1). On the other hand, AA and SLN inhibitors failed to inhibit the action of ECV-induced ECM protein degradation and hemorrhage. In support of the neutralization of hemorrhage, TTD treatment could efficiently protect mice footpad from ECV-induced necrosis (Fig 2). ECV-induced footpad necrosis is evident after day 4 of injection and necrotized little toe detached from limb between 6–8 days of ECV injection. This prompted us to carry out mice footpad necrosis experiments till 8 days after ECV injection. The successful neutralization of ECV-induced ECM proteins degradation and hemorrhage by TTD indicates that SVMPs are the main toxins responsible for ECV-induced toxicities. Further, EC SVMPs are also hemotoxic and interfere in hemostasis by hydrolyzing clotting factors that lead to persistent coagulopathy and death [79]. Most SVMPs are α and β fibrinogenases that act on fibrinogen and making them truncated, and non-functional [79]. A few scientific reports have shown that inhibitors of SVMPs effectively protect mice from viperid snake venom-induced lethality [22,23]. Similarly, TTD was effective in protecting mice from ECV-induced lethality and systemic hemorrhage (Fig 3). These data clearly indicate that TTD has a beneficial effect on neutralizing ECV-induced toxicities in mice.

Neutrophils are the first-line defense immune cells and efficiently arrest pathogens by NETosis at the site of infection [45,80]. Porto et al. demonstrated the infiltration of neutrophils at the site of viper venom injection [81]. However, the importance of NETosis in ECV-induced toxicities was not clear until Katkar et al. reported the critical role of NETosis in ECV-induced local tissue damage [15]. NETosis results in the blockage of blood vessels preventing venom from entering into the circulation. The accumulated venom-NETs complexes at the site of venom injection lead to the progressive tissue necrosis [15]. In addition, NETosis in non-healing wounds is noticeable by increased expression of PAD4, citH3 and MPO level [15,82]. However, the previous study did not explain in the context of the toxin that is responsible for ECV-induced NETosis and toxicities [15]. The inhibition of ECV-induced NETosis and reduced levels of PAD4, citH3 and MPO expression by TTD confirms the direct involvement of EC SVMPs in the induction of NETosis.

Nonetheless, the neutralized ECV-induced tissue necrosis and systemic hemorrhage by TTD correlated with the decreased ECV-induced NETosis. However, the mechanism of how ECV/SVMPs induce NETosis and toxicities is largely unknown. There are multiple scientific reports suggesting that the MMPs exert their effects by cleaving PARs and play an important role in vascular functions [21,48]. Moreover, MMPs bind and cleave the extracellular N-terminus of PAR-1 to release a tethered ligand and activate the intracellular G proteins across the membrane and initiate intracellular signaling cascade [21,83]. The inhibition of MMP-1 induced PAR-1 cleavage restricts the activation of MAPKs [84]. SVMPs belong to metzincin super-family and they are known to activate MAPKs signaling pathways in immune cells which results in elevated levels of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 leading to chronic inflammation [85]. Similarly, EC SVMPs mediates the phosphorylation of ERK in human neutrophils and it was completely inhibited by TTD (Fig 4). Similar to MMP-1, EC SVMPs might cleave PAR-1 at the non-canonical site and activate downstream MAPKs signaling. Finally, ECV-induced NETosis and tissue necrosis in experimental animals are effectively neutralized by PAR-1 antagonists (Figs 5 and 6). Overall, current findings indicate that direct involvement of PAR-1 and downstream MAPKs signaling cascade in EC SVMPs-induced toxicities in mice (Fig 7).

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for effective snakebite treatments that can be administered in the remote areas where medical access is limited and also that can complement ASV. The current findings suggested that TTD is a pharmacologically approved an Antabuse drug and that inhibits ECVMPs-induced NETosis in human neutrophils and footpad tissue necrosis in mice. Moreover, TTD also neutralized ECV-induced systemic hemorrhage and conferred protection against lethality in mice. Furthermore, we demonstrated that ECVMPs-induced NETosis and tissue necrosis is mediated via PAR-1-ERK axis. Overall, our results provide an insight into SVMPs-induced toxicities and the promising neutralizing potency of TTD can be exploited as first aid therapy, complementing ASV to treat snakebite-induced toxicities.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Inhibition of ECV-induced enzymatic activities by specific inhibitors.

ECV was pre-incubated without or with various concentrations of AA/TTD/SLN at 37°C for 5 min and subjected for PLA2 (A), hyaluronidase (B) and protease (C) activity. The inhibition was represented as % inhibition and venom alone considered as 100% activity. * p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + AA, ECV + SLN and ECV + TTD.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Effect of AA and SLN on ECV-induced ECM protein degradation and hemorrhage in mice.

ECV was pre-incubated without or with different concentrations of either AA (A) or SLN (C) at 37°C for 5 min and subjected to gelatin zymogram as described in methods section. Clear zones in the gel indicate the hydrolysis of gelatin by ECV. Area of gelatinolytic activity was measured using graph sheet represented as area (mm2) (A and C). For collagen I (Col I), degradation, ECV was pre-incubated without or with increased concentrations of either AA (B) or SLN (D). Pre-incubated reaction mixture of ECV and inhibitors were further incubated with 50 μg of collagen I for 3 h at 37°C and cleavage pattern was analyzed using 7.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by staining with CBB-G250. For skin hemorrhage, mice were injected (n = 3; i.d.) with 5 μg of ECV followed by two different concentrations of AA and SLN after 30 min venom injection. After 180 min, dorsal patches of mice skin were photographed (E and F). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Inhibition of ECV-induced protease activity and local toxicities by TTD.

Reaction mixture (1 ml) contained 0.4 ml of casein (2%) in 0.2 M Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.5 was incubated for 150 min at 37°C with 25 μg of ECV and various concentrations of TTD (0–20 mM). The inhibition was represented as % inhibition and IC50 (median inhibitory concentration) of the TTD was calculated (A). For inhibition of skin hemorrhage, mice were injected (i.d.) with 5 μg of ECV that was pre-incubated with different concentrations of TTD (0–20 mM) at 37°C for 5 min. After 180 min, dorsal patches of mice skin were photographed and IC50 (median inhibitory concentration) of the TTD was calculated (B and C). For inhibition of tissue necrosis, mice footpads were injected with ECV (LD50; 2.21 mg/kg) pre-incubated with TTD (20 mM) at 37°C for 5 min and footpads were photographed from day 1 to day 8 (D). Red arrow indicates edema and black arrow indicates tissue necrosis. ECV-induced footpad injury was measured manually on a scale of 1 to 5 (E). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Histochemical staining of ECV-induced tissue necrosis in mice footpad and its inhibition by TTD.

Mice footpad was injected with ECV followed by TTD or DNase 1 injection (30 min post venom injection). Mice were euthanized and footpad tissues were processed for histological sections and analyzed for tissue damage by H & E staining. PBS injected mouse footpad serves as control.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. ECV-induced NETosis and activation of intracellular signaling in neutrophils.

Human neutrophils were stimulated with ECV for 180 min and NETs formation was observed and quantitated (A). The whole cell lysates were analyzed for the phosphorylated ERK and NETosis markers using Western blotting. The p-ERK, MPO and PAD4 were quantitated using β-actin as a loading control and H3 as loading control for citH3. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Effect of AA and SLN on ECV-induced NETs formation.

Human neutrophils were stimulated (180 min) with ECV pre-incubated with different concentrations of either AA or SLN for 5 min at 37°C and NETs formation was photographed under microscope (A) and quantitated as percent NETosis (B). The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + AA and ECV + SLN.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Central Animal Facility, University of Mysore, for providing animals. Authors thank Prof. Manjunath Kini R, Dr. Nanjaraj UrsA N, Dr. Vikram Joshi and Dr. Suvilesh K N for providing valuable suggestions during the project. Authors also thank -Dr. Sumanth M S and Dr. Abhilasha K V for their help during experiments and neutrophils isolation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by the University Grants Commission of India, a statutory body set up by the Government of India under Ministry of Education (MRP-MAJOR-BIOC-2013-12157 to BSV) and Science and Engineering Research Board, a statutory body under the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (EEQ/2017/000737 to RR). Funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Gutierrez JM, Theakston RD, Warrell DA. Confronting the neglected problem of snake bite envenoming: the need for a global partnership. Plos Med. 2006;3(6):e150 Epub 2006/05/30. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030150 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warrell DA. Snake bite. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):77–88. Epub 2010/01/30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61754-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gutierrez JM, Rucavado A, Escalante T, Lomonte B, Angulo Y, Fox JW. Tissue pathology induced by snake venoms: how to understand a complex pattern of alterations from a systems biology perspective? Toxicon. 2010;55(1):166–70. Epub 2009/08/25. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.08.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nanjaraj Urs AN, Ramakrishnan C, Joshi V, Suvilesh KN, Veerabasappa Gowda T, Velmurugan D, et al. Progressive Hemorrhage and Myotoxicity Induced by Echis carinatus Venom in Murine Model: Neutralization by Inhibitor Cocktail of N,N,N’,N’-Tetrakis (2-Pyridylmethyl) Ethane-1,2-Diamine and Silymarin. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135843 Epub 2015/08/15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0135843 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmed SM, Ahmed M, Nadeem A, Mahajan J, Choudhary A, Pal J. Emergency treatment of a snake bite: Pearls from literature. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008;1(2):97–105. Epub 2009/06/30. 10.4103/0974-2700.43190 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amin MR, Mamun SMH, Rashid R, Rahman M, Ghose A, Sharmin S, et al. Anti-snake venom: use and adverse reaction in a snake bite study clinic in Bangladesh. J Venom Anim Toxins incl Trop Dis 2008;14(4):660–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gutierrez JM, Rucavado A. Snake venom metalloproteinases: Their role in the pathogenesis of local tissue damage. Biochimie. 2000;82(9–10):841–50. 10.1016/s0300-9084(00)01163-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gutierrez JM, Rucavado A, Escalante T, Diaz C. Hemorrhage induced by snake venom metalloproteinases: biochemical and biophysical mechanisms involved in microvessel damage. Toxicon. 2005;45(8):997–1011. Epub 2005/06/01. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Girish KS, Jagadeesha DK, Rajeev KB, Kemparaju K. Snake venom hyaluronidase: an evidence for isoforms and extracellular matrix degradation. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002;240(1–2):105–10. Epub 2002/12/19. 10.1023/a:1020651607164 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kemparaju K, Girish KS. Snake venom hyaluronidase: a therapeutic target. Cell Biochem Funct. 2006;24(1):7–12. Epub 2005/10/26. 10.1002/cbf.1261 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kochar DK, Tanwar PD, Norris RL, Sabir M, Nayak KC, Agrawal TD, et al. Rediscovery of severe saw-scaled viper (Echis sochureki) envenoming in the Thar desert region of Rajasthan, India. Wilderness Environ Med. 2007;18(2):75–85. Epub 2007/06/26. 10.1580/06-WEME-OR-078R.1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramos OH, Selistre-de-Araujo HS. Snake venom metalloproteases—structure and function of catalytic and disintegrin domains. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;142(3–4):328–46. Epub 2006/01/26. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2005.11.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Markland FS Jr., Swenson S. Snake venom metalloproteinases. Toxicon. 2013;62:3–18. Epub 2012/09/25. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.09.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lakhotia M, Kothari D, Choudhary DR, Sharma S, Jain PJJIACM. A case of saw scale viper snakebite presenting as pleuro-pericardial haemorrhage. 2002;3:392–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Katkar GD, Sundaram MS, NaveenKumar SK, Swethakumar B, Sharma RD, Paul M, et al. NETosis and lack of DNase activity are key factors in Echis carinatus venom-induced tissue destruction. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11361 Epub 2016/04/20. 10.1038/ncomms11361 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Suvilesh KN, Yariswamy M, Savitha MN, Joshi V, Nanjaraj Urs AN, Urs AP, et al. Purification and characterization of an anti-hemorrhagic protein from Naja naja (Indian cobra) venom. Toxicon. 2017;140:83–93. Epub 2017/11/07. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.10.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Escalante T, Rucavado A, Fox JW, Gutierrez JM. Key events in microvascular damage induced by snake venom hemorrhagic metalloproteinases. J Proteomics. 2011;74(9):1781–94. Epub 2011/03/31. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.03.026 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gutierrez JM, Escalante T, Rucavado A, Herrera C. Hemorrhage Caused by Snake Venom Metalloproteinases: A Journey of Discovery and Understanding. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(4):93 Epub 2016/03/31. 10.3390/toxins8040093 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gutierrez JM, Romero M, Diaz C, Borkow G, Ovadia M. Isolation and characterization of a metalloproteinase with weak hemorrhagic activity from the venom of the snake Bothrops asper (terciopelo). Toxicon. 1995;33(1):19–29. Epub 1995/01/01. 10.1016/0041-0101(94)00138-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takeda S. ADAM and ADAMTS Family Proteins and Snake Venom Metalloproteinases: A Structural Overview. Toxins (Basel). 2016;8(5). Epub 2016/05/20. 10.3390/toxins8050155 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Austin KM, Covic L, Kuliopulos A. Matrix metalloproteases and PAR1 activation. Blood. 2013;121(3):431–9. Epub 2012/10/23. 10.1182/blood-2012-09-355958 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nanjaraj Urs AN, Yariswamy M, Ramakrishnan C, Joshi V, Suvilesh KN, Savitha MN, et al. Inhibitory potential of three zinc chelating agents against the proteolytic, hemorrhagic, and myotoxic activities of Echis carinatus venom. Toxicon. 2015;93:68–78. Epub 2014/12/03. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.11.224 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Albulescu LO, Hale MS, Ainsworth S, Alsolaiss J, Crittenden E, Calvete JJ, et al. Preclinical validation of a repurposed metal chelator as an early-intervention therapeutic for hemotoxic snakebite. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(542). Epub 2020/05/08. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay8314 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gong Y, Chippada-Venkata UD, Oh WKJC. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases and their natural inhibitors in prostate cancer progression. 2014;6(3):1298–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raghavendra Gowda CD, Shivaprasad HV, Venkatesh Kumar R, Rajesh R, Saikumari YK, Frey BM, et al. Characterization of major zinc containing myonecrotic and procoagulant metalloprotease ‘malabarin’from non lethal trimeresurus malabaricus snake venom with thrombin like activity: Its neutralization by chelating agents. 2011;11(20):2578–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thompson JM, Agee K, Sidow SJ, McNally K, Lindsey K, Borke J, et al. Inhibition of endogenous dentin matrix metalloproteinases by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. J Endod. 2012;38(1):62–5. Epub 2011/12/14. 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pereañez JA, Patiño AC, Rey-Suarez P, Núñez V, Castañeda ICH, Rucavado AJT. Glycolic acid inhibits enzymatic, hemorrhagic and edema-inducing activities of BaP1, a P–I metalloproteinase from Bothrops asper snake venom: insights from docking and molecular modeling. 2013;71:41–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265–75. Epub 1951/11/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Patriarca P, Beckerdite S, Elsbach PJBeBA-L, Metabolism L. Phospholipases and phospholipid turnover in Escherichia coli spheroplasts. 1972;260(4):593–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reissig JL, Strominger JL, Leloir LFJJoBC. A modified colorimetric method for the estimation of N-acetylamino sugars. 1955;217(2):959–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.MURATA Y, SATAKE M, SUZUKI TJTJoB. Studies on snake venom. 1963;53(6):431–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Heussen C, Dowdle EB. Electrophoretic analysis of plasminogen activators in polyacrylamide gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate and copolymerized substrates. Anal Biochem. 1980;102(1):196–202. Epub 1980/02/01. 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90338-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Baramova EN, Shannon JD, Bjarnason JB, Fox JW. Degradation of extracellular matrix proteins by hemorrhagic metalloproteinases. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989;275(1):63–71. Epub 1989/11/15. 10.1016/0003-9861(89)90350-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kondo H, Kondo S, Ikezawa H, Murata R. Studies on the quantitative method for determination of hemorrhagic activity of Habu snake venom. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1960;13:43–52. Epub 1960/01/01. 10.7883/yoken1952.13.43 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rudresha GV, Manjuprasanna VN, Urs AP, Choudhury M, Rajaiah R, Vishwanath BS. Serine protease from Tricosanthus tricuspidata accelerates healing of Echis carinatus venom-induced necrotic wound. Toxicon. 2020;183:1–10. Epub 2020/05/24. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.05.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Svensson L, Aszódi A, Reinholt FP, Fässler R, Heinegård D, Oldberg ÅJJoBC. Fibromodulin-null mice have abnormal collagen fibrils, tissue organization, and altered lumican deposition in tendon. 1999;274(14):9636–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Meier J, Theakston RD. Approximate LD50 determinations of snake venoms using eight to ten experimental animals. Toxicon. 1986;24(4):395–401. Epub 1986/01/01. 10.1016/0041-0101(86)90199-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Urs AN, Yariswamy M, Joshi V, Suvilesh K, Sumanth M, Das D, et al. Local and systemic toxicity of Echis carinatus venom: neutralization by Cassia auriculata L. leaf methanol extract. 2015;69(1):111–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Halverson TW, Wilton M, Poon KK, Petri B, Lewenza S. DNA is an antimicrobial component of neutrophil extracellular traps. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(1):e1004593 Epub 2015/01/16. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004593 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rajaiah R, Perkins DJ, Ireland DD, Vogel SN. CD14 dependence of TLR4 endocytosis and TRIF signaling displays ligand specificity and is dissociable in endotoxin tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(27):8391–6. Epub 2015/06/25. 10.1073/pnas.1424980112 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rudresha GV, Urs AP, Manjuprasanna VN, Suvilesh KN, Sharanappa P, Vishwanath BS. Plant DNases are potent therapeutic agents against Echis carinatus venom-induced tissue necrosis in mice. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(5):8319–32. Epub 2018/12/07. 10.1002/jcb.28115 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Warrell DA, Davidson N, Greenwood BM, Ormerod LD, Pope HM, Watkins BJ, et al. Poisoning by bites of the saw-scaled or carpet viper (Echis carinatus) in Nigeria. Q J Med. 1977;46(181):33–62. Epub 1977/01/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(3):159–75. Epub 2013/02/26. 10.1038/nri3399 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sadik CD, Kim ND, Luster AD. Neutrophils cascading their way to inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(10):452–60. Epub 2011/08/16. 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303(5663):1532–5. Epub 2004/03/06. 10.1126/science.1092385 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.da Setubal SS, Pontes AS, Nery NM, Bastos JS, Castro OB, Pires WL, et al. Effect of Bothrops bilineata snake venom on neutrophil function. Toxicon. 2013;76:143–9. Epub 2013/10/02. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.09.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thiam HR, Wong SL, Qiu R, Kittisopikul M, Vahabikashi A, Goldman AE, et al. NETosis proceeds by cytoskeleton and endomembrane disassembly and PAD4-mediated chromatin decondensation and nuclear envelope rupture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(13):7326–37. Epub 2020/03/15. 10.1073/pnas.1909546117 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jaffre F, Friedman AE, Hu Z, Mackman N, Blaxall BC. beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation transactivates protease-activated receptor 1 via matrix metalloproteinase 13 in cardiac cells. Circulation. 2012;125(24):2993–3003. Epub 2012/05/23. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.066787 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mehta SR, Sashindran VK. Clinical Features And Management Of Snake Bite. Med J Armed Forces India. 2002;58(3):247–9. Epub 2002/07/01. 10.1016/S0377-1237(02)80140-X . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kanjanabuch T, Sitprija V. Snakebite nephrotoxicity in Asia. Semin Nephrol. 2008;28(4):363–72. Epub 2008/07/16. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2008.04.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maheshwari M, Mittal SR. Acute myocardial infarction complicating snake bite. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:63–4. Epub 2005/01/07. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Menon JC, Joseph K. Complications of hemotoxic snakebite in India Clinical Toxinology in Asia Pacific and Africa: Springer Reference, Dordrecht, Netherlands; 2015. p. 209–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kumar V, Maheshwari R, Verma HJJoVA, Diseases TiT. Toxicity and symptomatic identification of species involved in snakebites in the Indian subcontinent. 2006;12(1):3–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gnanathasan A, Rodrigo C, Peranantharajah T, Coonghe A JTAjotm, hygiene. Saw-scaled viper bites in Sri Lanka: is it a different subspecies? Clinical evidence from an authenticated case series. 2012;86(2):254–7. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Slagboom J, Kool J, Harrison RA, Casewell NR. Haemotoxic snake venoms: their functional activity, impact on snakebite victims and pharmaceutical promise. Br J Haematol. 2017;177(6):947–59. Epub 2017/02/25. 10.1111/bjh.14591 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Casewell NR. On the ancestral recruitment of metalloproteinases into the venom of snakes. Toxicon. 2012;60(4):449–54. Epub 2012/03/13. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.02.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Takeda S, Takeya H, Iwanaga S. Snake venom metalloproteinases: structure, function and relevance to the mammalian ADAM/ADAMTS family proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1824(1):164–76. Epub 2011/05/03. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.04.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fox JW, Serrano SM. Structural considerations of the snake venom metalloproteinases, key members of the M12 reprolysin family of metalloproteinases. Toxicon. 2005;45(8):969–85. Epub 2005/06/01. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Brust A, Sunagar K, Undheim EA, Vetter I, Yang DC, Casewell NR, et al. Differential evolution and neofunctionalization of snake venom metalloprotease domains. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12(3):651–63. Epub 2012/12/18. 10.1074/mcp.M112.023135 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wright C, Moore RD. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism. Am J Med. 1990;88(6):647–55. Epub 1990/06/01. 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90534-k . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yang Q, Yao Y, Li K, Jiao L, Zhu J, Ni C, et al. An Updated Review of Disulfiram: Molecular Targets and Strategies for Cancer Treatment. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(30):3248–56. Epub 2019/08/20. 10.2174/1381612825666190816233755 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jiao Y, Hannafon BN, Ding W-Q JA-CAiMC. Disulfiram’s anticancer activity: Evidence and mechanisms. 2016;16(11):1378–84. 10.2174/1871520615666160504095040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lee SA, Elliott JH, McMahon J, Hartogenesis W, Bumpus NN, Lifson JD, et al. Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Disulfiram on Inducing Latent HIV-1 Transcription in a Phase IIb Trial. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(3):692–702. Epub 2018/08/24. 10.1002/cpt.1220 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liegner KB. Disulfiram (Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide) in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Report of Experience in Three Cases. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019;8(2). Epub 2019/06/04. 10.3390/antibiotics8020072 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bernier M, Mitchell SJ, Wahl D, Diaz A, Singh A, Seo W, et al. Disulfiram Treatment Normalizes Body Weight in Obese Mice. Cell Metab. 2020. Epub 2020/05/16. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.019 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shian SG, Kao YR, Wu FY, Wu CW. Inhibition of invasion and angiogenesis by zinc-chelating agent disulfiram. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;64(5):1076–84. Epub 2003/10/24. 10.1124/mol.64.5.1076 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rucavado A, Escalante T, Franceschi A, Chaves F, León G, Cury Y, et al. Inhibition of local hemorrhage and dermonecrosis induced by Bothrops asper snake venom: effectiveness of early in situ administration of the peptidomimetic metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat and the chelating agent CaNa2EDTA. 2000;63(5):313–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rucavado A, Escalante T, Gutiérrez JM aJT. Effect of the metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat in the systemic toxicity induced by Bothrops asper snake venom: understanding the role of metalloproteinases in envenomation. 2004;43(4):417–24. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xie C, Albulescu L, Bittenbinder MA, Somsen G, Vonk F, Casewell NR, et al. Neutralizing effects of small molecule inhibitors and metal chelators on coagulopathic Viperinae snake venom toxins. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Layfield HJ, Williams HF, Ravishankar D, Mehmi A, Sonavane M, Salim A, et al. Repurposing cancer drugs batimastat and marimastat to inhibit the activity of a group I metalloprotease from the venom of the Western diamondback rattlesnake, Crotalus atrox. 2020;12(5):309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ainsworth S, Slagboom J, Alomran N, Pla D, Alhamdi Y, King SI, et al. The paraspecific neutralisation of snake venom induced coagulopathy by antivenoms. 2018;1(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Escalante T, Franceschi A, Rucavado A, Gutierrez JM. Effectiveness of batimastat, a synthetic inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases, in neutralizing local tissue damage induced by BaP1, a hemorrhagic metalloproteinase from the venom of the snake bothrops asper. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;60(2):269–74. Epub 2000/05/29. 10.1016/s0006-2952(00)00302-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.DER ROJJoAN. Disulfiram (Antabuse) Editor—Al Rundio, PhD, DNP, RN, APRN, CARN-AP, NEA-BC, DPNAP. 2010;21:54–5.
  • 74.Malcolm R, Olive MF, Lechner W JEoods. The safety of disulfiram for the treatment of alcohol and cocaine dependence in randomized clinical trials: guidance for clinical practice. 2008;7(4):459–72. 10.1517/14740338.7.4.459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chick J JDS. Safety issues concerning the use of disulfiram in treating alcohol dependence. 1999;20(5):427–35. 10.2165/00002018-199920050-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Aronson JK. Meyler’s side effects of drugs: the international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions: Elsevier; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Herrera C, Escalante T, Voisin MB, Rucavado A, Morazan D, Macedo JK, et al. Tissue localization and extracellular matrix degradation by PI, PII and PIII snake venom metalloproteinases: clues on the mechanisms of venom-induced hemorrhage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4):e0003731 Epub 2015/04/25. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003731 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Azevedo-Marques MM, Cupo P, Coimbra TM, Hering SE, Rossi MA, Laure CJ. Myonecrosis, myoglobinuria and acute renal failure induced by South American rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus terrificus) envenomation in Brazil. Toxicon. 1985;23(4):631–6. Epub 1985/01/01. 10.1016/0041-0101(85)90367-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hiremath V, Nanjaraj Urs AN, Joshi V, Suvilesh KN, Savitha MN, Urs Amog P, et al. Differential action of medically important Indian BIG FOUR snake venoms on rodent blood coagulation. Toxicon. 2016;110:19–26. Epub 2015/11/26. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.11.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps: is immunity the second function of chromatin? J Cell Biol. 2012;198(5):773–83. Epub 2012/09/05. 10.1083/jcb.201203170 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Porto BN, Telli CA, Dutra TP, Alves LS, Bozza MT, Fin CA, et al. Biochemical and biological characterization of the venoms of Bothriopsis bilineata and Bothriopsis taeniata (Serpentes: Viperidae). Toxicon. 2007;50(2):270–7. Epub 2007/06/01. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.03.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wong SL, Demers M, Martinod K, Gallant M, Wang Y, Goldfine AB, et al. Diabetes primes neutrophils to undergo NETosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):815–9. Epub 2015/06/16. 10.1038/nm.3887 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Foley CJ, Luo C, O’Callaghan K, Hinds PW, Covic L, Kuliopulos A. Matrix metalloprotease-1a promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(29):24330–8. Epub 2012/05/11. 10.1074/jbc.M112.356303 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Trivedi V, Boire A, Tchernychev B, Kaneider NC, Leger AJ, O’Callaghan K, et al. Platelet matrix metalloprotease-1 mediates thrombogenesis by activating PAR1 at a cryptic ligand site. Cell. 2009;137(2):332–43. Epub 2009/04/22. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.018 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Costa EP, Clissa PB, Teixeira CF, Moura-da-Silva AM. Importance of metalloproteinases and macrophages in viper snake envenomation-induced local inflammation. Inflammation. 2002;26(1):13–7. Epub 2002/04/09. 10.1023/a:1014465611487 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008596.r001

Decision Letter 0

Jean-Philippe Chippaux, Stuart Robert Ainsworth

17 Aug 2020

Dear Dr. Vishwanath,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Echis carinatus snake venom metalloprotease-induced toxicities in mice: therapeutic intervention by a repurposed drug, tetraethylthiuram disulfide (disulfiram)" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

All reviewers agreed this study is interesting and presents a novel contribution to the growing body of research into potential antivenom-alternative therapies. However, all reviewers highlighted concerns with: a) clarity of methodology (particularly with in vivo experiments); b) inadequate discussion of limitations; c) insufficient context of the results and methods used with regards to real-life envenomation and similar studies assessing SVMP inhibitors.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Stuart Robert Ainsworth

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jean-Philippe Chippaux

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The methods are generally clearly described with the following comments:

1. The two methods most likely to result in questions refer to other papers and "modified appropriately". Since these involve quite graphic images, I think it is better to be explicit about how this was done and most importantly, how the animals were kept comfortable. For example, the animals were sedated for the Disulfiram paw injection, but what about the venom injection? for the intradermal and paw injection this is my advice, but I would leave it to the authors to decide how best to handle.

2. "The signs and symptoms of toxicities were observed up to 24 h and survival time was

recorded. For systemic hemorrhage and bleeding studies, mice received ECV (LT50; 2.21 mg/kg,

i.p) and challenged with TTD (2.15 mg/kg; i.p) or ED ASV, 30 min post ECV injection. After 3 h

peritoneal cavity was observed for symptoms and photographed."

Here I think you have substituted "symptoms" where you mean "signs". Symptoms are "headache, back pain, abdominal pain" (subjective) whereas signs are things like, "hemorrhage, weakness, guarding" (physically observable)

Reviewer #2: Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated? Generally yes

Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives? Partially, see comments below.

Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested? Generally yes.

Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested? Yes

Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions? Partially, see comments below

Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met? No concerns

The use of inhibitors of PLA2 and hyaluronidase activities is interesting and relevant for assessing the possible role of these other venom enzymes in the pathogenesis of tissue damage. However, the authors need to show (controls) that such inhibitors, at the concentrations used, indeed inhibited enzymatic PLA2 and hyaluronidase activities. These controls are necessary.

ECV-induced hemorrhage, line 5: Use ‘various doses of…’ instead of ‘various concentrations’.

Description of the necrosis model in footpad: The semiquantitative scale used for grading the extent of tissue damage includes the ‘necrosis’. From the text it seems that such effect was judged visually, i.e., macroscopically. It is difficult to identify necrosis without doing histological analysis. Was this done to corroborate whether the macroscopic observations agree with histological assessment? It is recommended that the macroscopic observations of necrosis be complemented by histological observations, at least with the crude venom alone.

The authors need to briefly explain why was DNAse used as positive control in this assay.

In the necrosis assay, the inhibition experiments described include a protocol in which the inhibitor was administered after venom injection. Did the authors also carried out experiments with preincubation of venom and inhibitors? The same holds for the inhibition of hemorrhagic activity. Were preincubation experiments also done? Preincubation type experiments are necessary to determine the inhibitor IC50 (median inhibitory concentration), which enables the comparison with other SVMP inhibitors previously published. It is recommended that the authors do these preincubation inhibition experiments, and determine the IC50.

Experiments on lethality, third line: LD50 instead of LT50. In the lethality experiments the authors used the preincubation protocol in addition to the ‘rescue’ protocol. Why was this not done with hemorrhage and footpad necrosis?

Statistics: A non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U) was used to compare pairs of means, whereas a parametric test (ANOVA) was used for comparing means of more than two groups. If the authors decided that non-parametric tests were to be used, either because there is no evidence of a normal distribution of data or because the n is low, then both types of analyses should use non parametric tests and, therefore, Kruskal-Wallis test has to be used instead of ANOVA when comparing more than two groups.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: I have no question about the results. This is a very thorough investigation. It would be useful to have some clinical vision to illustrate how the authors might see this used and how the experimental doses compare to clinical observations.

For example, in my experience, Echis bite patients don't die immediately. The inflammatory syndrome appears over days. Does this mean high dose IV in the hospital is a viable concept or should it be an oral field treatment?

The authors admirably used rapidly lethal doses (hours). This speaks well to the concept. They should emphasize this. I doubt few people are envenomed with 3mg/kg venom. How would this drug be anticipated to perform at a lower dose, but more common bite presentation (for discussion eg). Would the dose of drug be lower and more plausible for pocket carriage?

Reviewer #2: Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan? Yes

Are the results clearly and completely presented? Generally yes.

Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity? Yes.

Inhibition of gelatin hydrolysis by venom: As shown in Fig 1, not even a concentration of 20 mM of the inhibitor inhibited the activity. In the text, the authors claim ‘maximal inhibition was observed at 20 mM TTD”. The sentence is a bit confusing, because no complete inhibition was achieved and also because it is likely that higher inhibitor concentration would have a higher inhibitory activity. The inhibition of proteolytic activity of venom on various ECM substrates is more clear and well shown.

Inhibition of hemorrhage: As noted above, it is recommended that the authors carry out experiments with preincubation of venom and various concentration of the inhibitor in order to determine the IC50.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: As above, I think two areas of discussion are lacking and the authors might be short-changing themselves:

1. What is the most common natural history presentation of Echis bite (rapid lethality or inflammatory/coagulopathy syndrome over period of days)? This puts clinical relevance and natural history into context and is very educational for readers, too.

The citations used by the authors for general description of viper bites cites one basic research article (32) and then the other two describe a European viper and Russell's viper as examples. If Echis is so deadly...the reader would expect literature examples describing Echis. These references are fine, but I was a little surprised. There also seems to be regional variation in the morbidity and mortality from Echis (e.g. fatalities rare in Sri Lanka, even in Jaffna area). Mainly, I think it is important to understand about the NETs, how quickly the inflammatory effects typically manifest as systemic illness and VICC for example. The paper is very strong on the scientific underpinnings, but it is hard to connect this set of dots. I think the story told by these extensive experimental explorations will be enhanced by clinical context. There is no doubt Echis is extremely hard to manage both acutely and chronically. Where does this fit in?

2. What are the best case and most likely clinical applications for this intervention?

Reviewer #2: Are the conclusions supported by the data presented? Generally yes, but see below.

Are the limitations of analysis clearly described? No, and on the basis of the comments indicated below, this will be necessary. The lack of histological assessment of necrosis is a limitation that needs to be discussed. My recommendation, however, is that the authors include this histological analysis to better describe the tissue necrosis.

Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study? Only partially. It is necessary to better place this study in the context of similar studies assessing the therapeutic potential of SVMP inhibitors.

Is public health relevance addressed? Yes, but it would be relevant to at least mention how would this inhibitor be administered in an eventual clinical use (route of injection).

There have been several studies exploring the use of synthetic inhibitors of SVMPs (including both chelating agents and peptidomimetic inhibitors) in experimental models of envenoming by various venoms. The authors need to mention these previous studies, in particular those carried out with Echis sp venoms. When doing this, it is relevant to compare the values of IC50s of some of these inhibitors vs disulfiram, because the concentrations of this inhibitor required to achieve inhibition of venom are in the mM range, while other inhibitors, including chelating agents are in the micromolar range. One wonders why the authors did not test for comparison other SVMP inhibitors previously tested which may be more potent than disulfiram and are commercially available. As mentioned above, it is necessary to find the value of IC50 of disulfiram for proteolytic and hemorrhagic activities through preincubation-type experiments.

The use of disulfiram has been associated with some adverse effects in patients. This may be mentioned in the Discussion.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Very nice paper. MRLewin

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting contribution that demonstrates that a chelating agent that inhibits SVMPs of Echis carinatus venom inhibits hemorrhagic, necrotizing, and lethal activities even when administered after venom injection, i.e. in rescue-type experiments. This underscores the relevance of SVMPs in the local and systemic effects induced by this venom. These findings are of value. The authors also evaluated the role of SVMPs in the generation of NETosis, which has been shown to be related to the pathogenesis of local necrosis. The possible role of PAR-1 and intracellular pathways in the genesis of NETosis by this venom is also shown. The main concerns I have with this work have been detailed in the comments to specific sections.

Reviewer #3: Rudresha et al. present a very interesting paper exploring the neutralisation of Echis carinatus venom (specifically the SVMP toxins) using a repurposed drug (disulfiram). The authors demonstrate interesting efficacy in a variety of animal models (haemorrhage, necrosis and lethality) and also explore the role of NETs in contributing to pathology. Overall, it’s a novel study, and the findings are really quite interesting. There are, however, a number of issues with the paper as it currently stands, though most relate to the text rather than the experimental approach (although see below). Currently, the rationale for various aspects of the work (inhibitor selection, experimental approach, etc) is unclear, with the reader left to piece it together themselves. Important information about the potential clinical utility of the disulfiram vs envenoming is also sadly lacking, including a critical evaluation of its likely utility. Finally, the animal experiments need to be much better defined – I found it impossible to robustly evaluate whether the venom challenges doses used in the lethality experiments were appropriate, for example, while details of the numbers of animals used in each experiment is missing. These are serious problems that currently undermine the manuscript. Despite these issues, there is potential for this study to be a novel and valuable contribution to the field, should the authors address the issues listed below.

Major comments

The introduction would benefit from some text describing other studies where inhibiting SVMPs has resulted in promising preclinical efficacy vs snakebite envenoming. Reading on, the first 12 lines or so of the results incorporate text that would be useful in the introduction to help the reader understand the rationale better. Please move and integrate this from the results to the introduction. Some rationale for the use of TTD, AA and SLN would be really helpful for the reader – why might these be useful?! It’s not until the first page of the results that I read that TTD has chelating properties, and that AA and SLN are PLA2 and hyaluronidase inhibitors… The rationale for Zn chelation needs to be clearly articulated in the introduction somewhere.

The scoring system used for the footpad experiments requires further detail given the subjective nature of these assessments. Given the nature of these experiments, were any ethical interventions used to reduce pain, suffering and distress of experimental animals? E.g. analgesia? Also, what was the rationale for SCH79797 before venom delivery, while TTD was given post-venom delivery? Why was the venom dose reduced for SCH79797 experiments? This needs to be explained. Finally, what does “LT50” stand for? This is not explained as far as I can see.

For the mortality studies, the above point about LT50 is important. Why was a known factor of the LD50 (e.g. 5 x LD50) not used? Details of the antivenom used need to be provided – including source, dose used and route of injection. Finally, for the hemorrhage study: why was the peritoneal cavity only observed in the 2 hour reduced venom challenge experiments, and not the 24 h experiments? Please also change “hemorrage and bleeding studies” to “hemorrhage study”, and “After 3 h peritoneal” to “after 3 h the animals were euthanized and the peritoneal cavity”

All animal experiments need to be clearly defined in terms of numbers of mice used per experimental arm. The details of n numbers also needs to be added to the figure legends. There are hints that the haemorrhage experiments are n=2, which is low, but its not detailed anywhere, so I cannot assess this.

I don’t find the degradation gels for laminin (Figure 1, E) or Fibronectin (F) convincing. There are clear lower molecular weight degradation products in the laminin gel even at 20mM TTD concentration, and likewise, for the fibronectin gel the pattern does not match the control. There might be some inhibition, but its not particularly convincing. Also, Panel D in Figure 1 (collagen IV) needs repeating, because there is insufficient clarity in the image due to protein overloading.

For the NET formation work, did the authors consider fractionating EC venom to obtain SVMPs to test directly to confirm their hypothesis that SVMPs are likely the causative agents (suggested by the TTD experiments)

In the discussion, the section about TTD requires some additional information. The text about ‘repurposing’ for cancer, AIDS and Lyme disease etc, needs an explanation of the type of studies cited – are the clinical trials? Preclinical studies? Or in vitro studies? Please detail. When discussing other metal chelators you should also cited the paper by Ainsworth et al. 2018 Communications Biology where EDTA was shown to protect against lethality caused by Echis envenoming in vivo. Why did the authors select TTD over other these SVMP inhibitors previously explored (and others, e.g. marimastat, batimastat)? An explanation of the rationale would be helpful. What are the potential drawbacks of TTD in terms of its potential translation for snakebite envenoming? Some discussion of its known PK, tolerance and route of administration should be discussed. What about the doses used in this study? How might they relate to doses required for clinical use? Given that there are a number of safety concerns with the use of TTD – these should be explicitly stated. The discussion would also benefit from the authors stating what needs to be done next to move this promising drug forward.

Minor comments

Abstract: ECV definition needs explaining.

Introduction: “never the less” should read “nevertheless”

Introduction: Echis should be italicised

Introduction: “Echis bite is responsible for the highest mortality” – I’m not sure there is any evidence for this in India. If there is, it should be cited. Also, “due to rich in zinc” should read “due to its venom being rich in zinc”

Introduction: “(NETs) the process is described as”, please edit to “(NETs) – this process is described as”

Introduction: “they showed that NETs” – who showed this?! Revise to “A previous study showed etc”. Also “lock” should be replaced by “entrap”

Introduction: “in this line we have used an Antabuse drug”. This doesn’t follow for the reader – you need to explain why disulfiram was tested based on the findings above. Also, replace “in this line” with “consequently” or something similar.

Methods: How long were the venoms stored at -20C for?

Methods: please detail the sex of the mice used.

Methods: please add the conditions used for electrophoresis.

Methods: Why were different doses of TTD, AA and SLN given to the mice when assessing haemorrhage? Why were these not consistent to enable comparison?

Methods: “analysis of NETs formationand” should read “Analysis of NET formation and”

Methods: please detail exactly what the lysis buffer containing EDTA free protease inhibitor mixture contains.

Methods: For western blotting, please provide the electro-blotting conditions used, the concentration of primary antibodies used, and what the TBST buffer contains.

Results: change “TTD also inhibited ECV-induced ECM proteins, collagen, laminin and fibronectin degradation” to “TTD also inhibited ECV-induced degradation of the ECM proteins, collagen, laminin and fibronectin, “

Results: change “skin hemorrhage in mice skin” to “murine skin hemorrhage”

Results: Sentence beginning “Recently, Katkar et al. reported” needs rephrasing.

Results: “ECV is lethal when injected at 3.31 mg/kg” – please provide the reference supporting this assertion.

Results: “therapeutic mode” might read better as “challenge then treat”

Results: “this indidcates that TTD is a potential drug candidate that complements ASV during EC bite” – reword. No evidence that this is a complementary treatment, instead used as a comparator. Please detail dosage of both TTD and ASV used so that the reader understands this clearly at this point in the manuscript.

Results: For the neutralisation of lethality please describe the data. I.e. both TTD and ASV protected all experimental animals (n=5?) from the lethal effects of the venom in the 24 h coincubation model. For the challenge then treat model, four of five (?) experimental animals survived when treated with TTD etc.

Results: “Bothrops bilineata” should read “Bothrops bilineatus”

Results: sentence beginning “PARs are members” needs editing as currently it doesn’t make sense. Also “relatively MMPs are acted on” also needs editing.

Figure 3: I suggest that the authors crop the mouse images so that only the exposed peritoneal cavity is visible, and enlarge the images to allow better clarity.

Discussion: “Viper bites predominately cause local tissue necrosis at the bitten site”. Actually this is not the most common sign of pathology – some victims suffer necrosis, but only a small percentage. Rephrase.

Discussion: “Generally SVMPs contain..” – only the P-III SVMPs contains the D, C and M domains. The rest of the sentence about ADAMDEC-1 is unclear – this isn’t an SVMP. And again, later in the paragraph “the ADAMDEC-1 plays a crucial role in their enzymatic activities”. This is unclear – ADAMDEC-1 is not a domain of SVMPs…

Discussion: “chelation of Zn metal ion from SVMPs by specific Zn chelators rather than antivenom like molecule is more effective in the management…” Is it? What is the evidence for this?

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Matthew R. Lewin

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008596.r003

Decision Letter 1

Jean-Philippe Chippaux, Stuart Robert Ainsworth

13 Nov 2020

Dear Dr. Vishwanath,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Echis carinatus snake venom metalloprotease-induced toxicities in mice: therapeutic intervention by a repurposed drug, Tetraethylthiuram disulfide (Disulfiram)" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email).

The scientific contribution of this study is substantial, and it is highly desirable that it be published. However, we are presently recommending a “major revision”.

The reason for this is that both myself and Deputy editor are concerned regarding the ethics of the footpad model employed in this study. Moreover, all the reviewers, at one moment or another, have additionally questioned the ethical problem of this model. It is evident from the photographs in the figures that the mice would have experienced substantial pain and distress for an extended period.

From the results presented in Fig 2 A/B/C, Fig 6 and Fig S3 D/E, it is difficult to understand the requirement to expand the experiment past day 4. Is the data obtained by day 4 not sufficient to demonstrate a clear conclusion? It is sufficient, then it is unnecessary to extend the suffering of the animals to day 8.

We are therefore requesting further addition of discussion and clarification regarding this model.

Specifically:

1) you need to unequivocally demonstrate, using strong arguments, that it is essential to prolong the monitoring of the mice in the footpad model for 8 days.

Or

2) Demonstrate that you recognize that the elements obtained on the fourth day (or earlier) are sufficient to obtain a clear conclusion without difference to that of the eighth day, and therefore that it becomes unnecessary to prolong the suffering of the mice beyond this point.

We recognize the urgent need for research investigating anti-necrotic snakebite therapies, and that due to the complex pathology of envenoming animal models are currently a necessity. However, it is essential to find a way to avoid the suffering of the mice during the entire duration of such experiments and not just at the time of the injection of the venom. If analgesia was used throughout the experiment, this has not been stated yet. Considerations of refining the protocol for future use (by yourselves or others) need to be included.

We would like to invite the re-submission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the above comments and reviewers' comments, below.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Stuart Robert Ainsworth

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jean-Philippe Chippaux

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: This is both impressive and done with sufficient detail that I feel as if I could readily reproduce or extend the studies described. I appreciate the diligent methodology and reporting.

Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed my main concerns with the methods and have modified the paper accordingly. The inclusion of experiments with preincubation of venom and inhibitor was done.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Yes. See below.

Reviewer #2: No major comments, except that I suggest the authors express the inhibitory activity on proteolysis and hemorrhage of the chelating agent in molar terms, i.e. expressing the Median Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) in molar terms. In the manuscript they present a graph but there is no reference to IC50. In order to compare this inhibitor with others, and to better express its inhibitory activity, IC50 should be expressed in molar terms in experiments where venom and inhibitors were preincubated. The authors already have the information to do so.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Yes. See below.

Reviewer #2: The conclusions are sound and supported by the data.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This is both impressive and done with sufficient detail that I feel as if I could readily reproduce or extend the studies described. I appreciate the diligent methodology and reporting.

I make two comments:

Discussion: The LD50s (refs 50-52) do not match well with what you would expect if the effect of the venom was linear e.g. 6.5mg/kg and venom yield of 40mg...would kill 1/2 the people weighing six or seven Kg. What I think the authors intend from their work and other elements of the paper is to show that the effect of a small amount of venom produces an outsized effect on human victims through cascades of provoked inflammation. What is needed to produce lethality in mice is not necessary to make this argument coherent...mice and humans are not comparable for purposes of susceptibility to inflammation or the response to venom. Noting this does not in any way diminish the methods or overall conclusions. I would say it strengthens the arguments that pharmacological interventions that can neutralize venom and/or simply blunt the victims dysregulated response to venom or venom-induced tissue injury helps the case. Based on the reported LD50 (at least as stated), you would need much much bigger snakes to have serious lethality. A 40mg dose of venom is a relative under-dose. What is remarkable is how big an injury and degree of lethality that little amount of venom can produce.

The vast majority of snakebites are from defensive strikes and minimal venom is injected. Yet, despite this massive "under-dosing" the bites produce devastating systemic effects (likely because of dysregulated host response--humans are not the intended victims of venom). Saw scale vipers are a particularly notable case. The patients rarely die quickly. The major damage occurs days or weeks after the bite. Understanding this is key to understanding the relevance of the work and for the authors to show why understanding the mechanisms--particularly for saw scale--is critical. A more explicit statement of the natural history of the bites would be helpful to put your findings in context for general readers.

I think this reference is an omission and should be included (I am not any of these people): It probably belongs in the bibliography around reference 54 or so.

Brust A, Sunagar K, Undheim EA, Vetter I, Yang DC, Casewell NR, Jackson TN, Koludarov I, Alewood PF, Hodgson WC, Lewis RJ, King GF, Antunes A, Hendrikx I, Fry BG. Differential evolution and neofunctionalization of snake venom metalloprotease domains. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Mar;12(3):651-63.

Superb team effort to put this all together.

Matthew R. Lewin, MD, PhD

California Academy of Sciences

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: It’s nice to see that the authors have really engaged with the various reviewer suggestions and have integrated a number of changes into the manuscript. I am happy for the manuscript to be accepted, pending some minor corrections outlined below. The manuscript would also benefit from some English language improvements, which hopefully PLOS NTD will be able to facilitate. I congratulate the authors on a very interesting piece of work.

Suggested minor changes:

Author summary: “Here we investigated the ECVMPs are responsible for”. ECVMP has not been defined at this point.

Methods, in vivo experiments and elsewhere: “challenging” studies, would be better as “challenge studies”

Discussion, first line: Would read better as: “Viper bites can induce progressive tissue necrosis that can result in permanent disability in the affected limb or digit”

Discussion, second line: this sentence (beginning “there are several case reports”) needs rephrasing as it doesn’t currently make sense.

Discussion, lines 3-6: citations are needed for this information about Echis carinatus envenoming.

Discussion, line 7: given the text about human envenoming above, the LD50 information needs to be clearer that this relates to animal studies! i.e. “in mice”

Discussion, line 11-12: my understanding is that Echis envenomings predominately act in a procoagulant manner by activating prothrombin, not Factor V or X.

My final suggestion would be that the authors write a final paragraph summarising the wider implications of their interesting findings and what should be done next to progress their work. Currently, the paper finishes quite abruptly.

Accompanying raw data underpinning the manuscript should be made available in some form.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Matthew R Lewin

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-methods

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008596.r005

Decision Letter 2

Jean-Philippe Chippaux, Stuart Robert Ainsworth

3 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Vishwanath,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Echis carinatus snake venom metalloprotease-induced toxicities in mice: therapeutic intervention by a repurposed drug, Tetraethylthiuram disulfide (Disulfiram)' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Stuart Robert Ainsworth

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Jean-Philippe Chippaux

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008596.r006

Acceptance letter

Jean-Philippe Chippaux, Stuart Robert Ainsworth

29 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Vishwanath,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, " Echis carinatus   snake venom metalloprotease-induced toxicities in mice: therapeutic intervention by a repurposed drug, Tetraethylthiuram disulfide (Disulfiram)," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Inhibition of ECV-induced enzymatic activities by specific inhibitors.

    ECV was pre-incubated without or with various concentrations of AA/TTD/SLN at 37°C for 5 min and subjected for PLA2 (A), hyaluronidase (B) and protease (C) activity. The inhibition was represented as % inhibition and venom alone considered as 100% activity. * p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + AA, ECV + SLN and ECV + TTD.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Effect of AA and SLN on ECV-induced ECM protein degradation and hemorrhage in mice.

    ECV was pre-incubated without or with different concentrations of either AA (A) or SLN (C) at 37°C for 5 min and subjected to gelatin zymogram as described in methods section. Clear zones in the gel indicate the hydrolysis of gelatin by ECV. Area of gelatinolytic activity was measured using graph sheet represented as area (mm2) (A and C). For collagen I (Col I), degradation, ECV was pre-incubated without or with increased concentrations of either AA (B) or SLN (D). Pre-incubated reaction mixture of ECV and inhibitors were further incubated with 50 μg of collagen I for 3 h at 37°C and cleavage pattern was analyzed using 7.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by staining with CBB-G250. For skin hemorrhage, mice were injected (n = 3; i.d.) with 5 μg of ECV followed by two different concentrations of AA and SLN after 30 min venom injection. After 180 min, dorsal patches of mice skin were photographed (E and F). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Inhibition of ECV-induced protease activity and local toxicities by TTD.

    Reaction mixture (1 ml) contained 0.4 ml of casein (2%) in 0.2 M Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.5 was incubated for 150 min at 37°C with 25 μg of ECV and various concentrations of TTD (0–20 mM). The inhibition was represented as % inhibition and IC50 (median inhibitory concentration) of the TTD was calculated (A). For inhibition of skin hemorrhage, mice were injected (i.d.) with 5 μg of ECV that was pre-incubated with different concentrations of TTD (0–20 mM) at 37°C for 5 min. After 180 min, dorsal patches of mice skin were photographed and IC50 (median inhibitory concentration) of the TTD was calculated (B and C). For inhibition of tissue necrosis, mice footpads were injected with ECV (LD50; 2.21 mg/kg) pre-incubated with TTD (20 mM) at 37°C for 5 min and footpads were photographed from day 1 to day 8 (D). Red arrow indicates edema and black arrow indicates tissue necrosis. ECV-induced footpad injury was measured manually on a scale of 1 to 5 (E). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Histochemical staining of ECV-induced tissue necrosis in mice footpad and its inhibition by TTD.

    Mice footpad was injected with ECV followed by TTD or DNase 1 injection (30 min post venom injection). Mice were euthanized and footpad tissues were processed for histological sections and analyzed for tissue damage by H & E staining. PBS injected mouse footpad serves as control.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. ECV-induced NETosis and activation of intracellular signaling in neutrophils.

    Human neutrophils were stimulated with ECV for 180 min and NETs formation was observed and quantitated (A). The whole cell lysates were analyzed for the phosphorylated ERK and NETosis markers using Western blotting. The p-ERK, MPO and PAD4 were quantitated using β-actin as a loading control and H3 as loading control for citH3. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Effect of AA and SLN on ECV-induced NETs formation.

    Human neutrophils were stimulated (180 min) with ECV pre-incubated with different concentrations of either AA or SLN for 5 min at 37°C and NETs formation was photographed under microscope (A) and quantitated as percent NETosis (B). The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05, when compared ECV versus ECV + AA and ECV + SLN.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments PNTD.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD R2 response to reviewer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES