Abstract
Oxynitride photocatalysts hold promise for renewable solar hydrogen production via water splitting owing to their intense visible light absorption. Cocatalyst loading is essential for activation of such oxynitride photocatalysts. However, cocatalyst nanoparticles form aggregates and exhibit weak interaction with photocatalysts, which prevents eliciting their intrinsic photocatalytic performance. Here, we demonstrate efficient utilization of photoexcited electrons in a single-crystalline particulate BaTaO2N photocatalyst prepared with the assistance of RbCl flux for H2 evolution reactions via sequential decoration of Pt cocatalyst by impregnation-reduction followed by site-selective photodeposition. The Pt-loaded BaTaO2N photocatalyst evolves H2 over 100 times more efficiently than before, with an apparent quantum yield of 6.8% at the wavelength of 420 nm, from a methanol aqueous solution, and a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency of 0.24% in Z-scheme water splitting. Enabling uniform dispersion and intimate contact of cocatalyst nanoparticles on single-crystalline narrow-bandgap particulate photocatalysts is a key to efficient solar-to-chemical energy conversion.
Subject terms: Photocatalysis, Excited states, Photocatalysis, Nanoparticles
Activation of narrow-bandgap photocatalysts holds key to applicable solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion. Here, the authors demonstrate effective sequential cocatalyst decoration for such narrow-bandgap photocatalysts to realise highly-efficient hydrogen evolution and Z-scheme water splitting.
Introduction
Water splitting using particulate photocatalysts is regarded as a technologically simple and cost-competitive approach toward sustainable solar hydrogen production owing to its potential for large-scale applications1–5. However, the solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency (STH) of particulate photocatalysts in water-splitting processes is still behind those of photovoltaic or photoelectrochemical devices6,7. Nevertheless, recent improvements in quantum efficiency, the optical wavelength range usable for the reaction, and the STH of particulate photocatalysts and reactors8–13 are encouraging for the development of efficient particulate photocatalysts with narrow bandgaps for water splitting. In particular, the Z-scheme water-splitting system has an advantage for harvesting visible light in a wide wavelength range, because it utilizes two-step photoexcitation of an H2-evolving photocatalyst (HEP) and an O2-evolving photocatalyst (OEP), and therefore allows to work with versatile narrow-bandgap particulate photocatalysts10,14. However, existing Z-scheme systems exhibit low water-splitting efficiency, even though 600-nm-class (oxy)nitrides15–17, (oxy)chalcogenides18–20 and dye-sensitized photocatalysts21 have been applied as HEPs (see Supplementary Table 1). To take advantage of the Z-scheme system, it is essential to identify the factors needed to activate narrow-bandgap photocatalyst materials.
Perovskite-type BaTaO2N with a bandgap of around 1.8 eV is a photocatalyst material that has been intensively studied for Z-scheme water splitting15,16,22,23, as well as H2 or O2 evolution half-reactions using sacrificial reagents15,24–27 (see Supplementary Table 2). The BaTaO2N photocatalyst intrinsically exhibits a weak driving force for surface redox reactions14, and loading of cocatalysts such as nanoparticulate Pt is essential to promote the extraction of photogenerated charge carriers from BaTaO2N for efficient H2 evolution22,23,28–33. However, Pt loaded by conventional impregnation or photodeposition methods tends to form aggregates on BaTaO2N and to have weak contact with BaTaO2N particles, resulting in the inadequate formation of active catalytic sites and inefficient electron transfer. In addition, BaTaO2N particles produced by thermal nitridation are generally polycrystalline and incorporate structural defects and mid-gap states that act as recombination and trapping centres for photogenerated electron–hole pairs15,16,22,23,25. Therefore, the efficiency of photocatalytic H2 evolution on BaTaO2N needs to be boosted by utilizing a single-crystalline particulate photocatalyst and establishing a strategy to realize an active cocatalyst/photocatalyst reciprocal structure. Herein, we present an effective cocatalyst engineering strategy based on the stepwise deposition of Pt nanoparticles on a single-crystalline BaTaO2N particulate photocatalyst, involving an impregnation–reduction pre-treatment and a subsequent photodeposition process. In the impregnation–reduction process, uniformly dispersed Pt seeds form an intimate contact with BaTaO2N. Subsequently, photodeposition allows Pt nanoparticles to uniformly grow at the numerous active Pt seeds. This approach causes the photocatalytic efficiency of the resulting Pt-loaded BaTaO2N for H2 evolution from an aqueous methanol solution and Z-scheme water splitting constructed with WO3 to be highly improved.
Results and discussion
Preparation of Pt-modified BaTaO2N
The preparation of BaTaO2N, loading of Pt nanoparticles on BaTaO2N, and the photocatalytic H2 production and Z-scheme water splitting, are described in detail in the subsections of “Methods”. Briefly, BaTaO2N was synthesized by one-pot nitridation of a BaCO3 and Ta2O5 mixture with the assistance of molten RbCl or other alkali chlorides (NaCl, KCl, or CsCl) fluxes at 1223 K for 8 h under a flow of gaseous NH3 (200 mL min−1)24,34. BaTaO2N prepared by using RbCl, NaCl, KCl, and CsCl fluxes are denoted as BaTaO2N (RbCl), BaTaO2N (NaCl), BaTaO2N (KCl), and BaTaO2N (CsCl), respectively. The two-step cocatalyst modification procedure was initiated by loading a small amount of the Pt precursor on BaTaO2N and a subsequent reduction treatment in an H2 atmosphere at 473 K for 1 h. An additional amount of Pt cocatalyst was then deposited on the Pt-impregnated BaTaO2N by photoreduction using methanol as a sacrificial electron donor. Pt-loaded BaTaO2N samples are hereafter denoted as Pt(xIMP + yPD)/BaTaO2N, where x and y express the loaded amounts of Pt cocatalyst in weight percent by the impregnation–reduction and photodeposition processes, respectively. For comparison, a Pt cocatalyst was also loaded on BaTaO2N by an impregnation–reduction process or a photodeposition process alone, and these samples are denoted as Pt(xIMP)/BaTaO2N and Pt(yPD)/BaTaO2N, respectively.
The materials properties of BaTaO2N (RbCl) were examined because BaTaO2N (RbCl) exhibited greater H2 evolution activity than BaTaO2N synthesized by using the other alkali chloride fluxes when being decorated with Pt by photodeposition24,34. The X-ray diffraction pattern (Supplementary Fig. 1a) shows that typical perovskite-type BaTaO2N was obtained through RbCl flux-assisted one-pot nitridation. The UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 1b) demonstrates a light absorption edge at 650 nm, which is characteristic of BaTaO2N. The background absorption beyond 650 nm is negligible owing to the low concentration of reduced Ta5+ species and anion vacancies22,23. The BaTaO2N was composed of cuboid particles smaller than 500 nm in size, as indicated in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (Supplementary Fig. 1c). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of the BaTaO2N particle are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1d and e, together with a structural model of BaTaO2N that correlates the image spots with atomic positions (Supplementary Fig. 1f). The atomic-scale periodical image contrast without any dislocations or grain boundaries indicates that BaTaO2N (RbCl) consists of single-crystalline particles.
H2-evolution activity of Pt-modified BaTaO2N (RbCl)
The H2-evolution activity of the BaTaO2N (RbCl) photocatalyst was evaluated after modification with the Pt cocatalyst. Figure 1a shows the dependence of the H2-evolution rate on the amount of Pt cocatalyst loaded on BaTaO2N via the different methods. The H2-evolution rate was obtained during the first hour of the photocatalytic reaction in a sacrificial methanol aqueous solution (Supplementary Fig. 2). BaTaO2N loaded with a Pt cocatalyst by impregnation–reduction exhibited a more than ten times higher activity for H2 evolution than those loaded with a Pt cocatalyst by photodeposition for the same loading amounts. Moreover, a remarkable enhancement of photocatalytic H2 production was realized on BaTaO2N by two-step decoration of the Pt cocatalyst (Fig. 1a), in which 0.1 wt% Pt cocatalyst was loaded on BaTaO2N by the impregnation–reduction procedure and the subsequent photodeposition of additional Pt cocatalyst. The H2-evolution activity increased with increasing content of photodeposited Pt cocatalyst, reaching a maximum at 0.2 wt% additional Pt loading by photodeposition (0.3 wt% Pt in total), and then sharply decreased with further Pt loading (Fig. 1a). The apparent quantum yield (AQY) for the optimized Pt-loaded BaTaO2N by sequential decoration during photocatalytic H2 evolution as a function of the irradiation wavelength is plotted in Fig. 1b. The onset irradiation wavelength for H2 generation agreed well with the absorption edge for this BaTaO2N photocatalyst. The AQY values were 6.8 ± 0.5% at 420 nm (±25 nm), 2.9 ± 0.4% at 500 nm (±25 nm), and 0.8 ± 0.3% at 600 nm (±25 nm), which are more than 100 times higher than those reported for BaTaO2N photocatalysts (see Supplementary Table 2). This is the most efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution from a sacrificial methanol solution using a 600-nm-class photocatalyst. It should be also noted that BaTaO2N (RbCl) modified with Pt cocatalyst by two-step decoration was stable during the photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Interaction of Pt cocatalyst with BaTaO2N (RbCl)
To understand the enhancement mechanism for photocatalytic activity upon two-step cocatalyst decoration, the morphology and fine structure of Pt particles on BaTaO2N were compared by SEM (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 4) and HRTEM (Fig. 2b). The actual loading amounts of the Pt cocatalyst on BaTaO2N by the three deposition procedures were in accordance with the introduced Pt content in the samples (Supplementary Table 3). Pt nanoparticles of uniform size were dispersed homogeneously on each BaTaO2N particle without obvious aggregation when 0.3 wt% Pt was loaded by the two-step decoration method. They had hemispherical shapes and intimate interfacial contact with the BaTaO2N. Pt particles having hemispherical shapes were also deposited firmly on BaTaO2N by the impregnation–reduction method owing to the thermal H2-reduction treatment. However, Pt nanoparticles were aggregated on BaTaO2N for a Pt loading of 0.3 wt%, and it was necessary to decrease the loading amount to 0.1 wt% to avoid aggregation. When the Pt cocatalyst was loaded by the photodeposition method, regardless of the cocatalyst amount (0.2 or 0.3 wt%), the Pt particles were localized at electron-accumulating sites of BaTaO2N and formed large clusters on some active BaTaO2N particles. Moreover, the Pt nanoparticles were spheroidal and had a small contact area with the cuboid-like BaTaO2N, suggesting a weak interaction with the BaTaO2N photocatalyst. Notably, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra demonstrated that the Pt cocatalysts deposited by the three decoration methods were metallic and the surface components of BaTaO2N were unchanged during the different cocatalyst modification procedures (Supplementary Fig. 5). Therefore, the morphology and dispersivity of Pt nanoparticles using the different decoration procedures are most likely responsible for the distinct H2-evolution activity of BaTaO2N.
Transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS) was used to examine how the structure of the nanoparticulate Pt cocatalyst affected the behavior of photogenerated charge carriers in BaTaO2N (Fig. 3a). The faster decay of the absorption intensity at 5000 cm−1 (2000 nm, 0.62 eV) for the Pt-modified BaTaO2N samples than for the bare BaTaO2N reflects the efficient electron transfer from BaTaO2N to the Pt cocatalyst35,36. Supplementary Table 4 lists the results of a quantitative estimation of the remaining electrons in the Pt-modified BaTaO2N with respect to pristine BaTaO2N. At 300 μs after photoexcitation, nearly 80% of photoexcited electrons in BaTaO2N were captured by the Pt cocatalyst loaded via the two-step procedure, which was more efficient than the case for those loaded via the individual impregnation–reduction or photodeposition methods. In addition, the prolonged lifetime of photoexcited holes for Pt-loaded BaTaO2N by two-step decoration (Supplementary Fig. 6) indicates a reduction in the electron–hole recombination rate in BaTaO2N owing to efficient electron transfer to the Pt cocatalyst35.
The sequential decoration method apparently avoids the problems with the individual impregnation–reduction and photodeposition methods where the Pt cocatalysts aggregate and interact weakly with the BaTaO2N photocatalyst (Supplementary Fig. 7). The pre-loading of Pt nuclei in the initial impregnation–reduction step is regarded as a surface pre-treatment of BaTaO2N that helps to create finely dispersed active sites to induce the uniform growth of Pt particles during the subsequent photodeposition process (Fig. 3b), because the photodeposition process still generated aggregated Pt particles on BaTaO2N after the H2-reduction treatment without impregnation of Pt species (Supplementary Fig. 8). This is also consistent with a control experiment in which Pd species was photodeposited as a probe. The photodeposition of Pd occurred more rapidly on Pt-impregnated BaTaO2N than on pristine BaTaO2N, and Pd particles were preferentially formed on the pre-introduced Pt sites (Supplementary Fig. 9). As a result, the sequential decoration method that realizes well-distributed Pt catalytic sites with modest particle sizes and intimate interaction with BaTaO2N, can maximize electron extraction and transfer for surface proton-reduction reactions37–41.
Effects of the quality of BaTaO2N photocatalysts
We note that the properties of BaTaO2N also play a pivotal role in achieving efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution through two-step Pt cocatalyst decoration. BaTaO2N (RbCl) exhibited superior photocatalytic H2-evolution activity to those prepared using other alkali chloride fluxes (Fig. 4a), although these flux-assisted BaTaO2N photocatalysts exhibited similar cuboid crystal shape (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 10) and the loading of the same amount of metallic Pt cocatalysts were confirmed (Supplementary Fig. 11). Figure 4b, c depicts transient absorption intensity profiles at 11000 cm−1 (910 nm, 1.36 eV) and at 15400 cm−1 (649 nm, 1.91 eV), reflecting the dynamics of deeply trapped electrons and photoexcited holes, respectively, acquired for these Pt-modified BaTaO2N samples. The populations of deeply trapped electrons and photoexcited holes decayed more rapidly and slowly, respectively, on a microsecond timescale as the H2 evolution activity became greater. From a comparison of the bare and Pt-modified BaTaO2N samples (Supplementary Fig. 12a, b), BaTaO2N (RbCl) benefitted most from the Pt cocatalyst loading, indicating more efficient electron migration to Pt and less electron trapping in BaTaO2N. Moreover, BaTaO2N (RbCl) exhibited faster decay of deeply trapped electrons than BaTaO2N (NaCl) and BaTaO2N (CsCl), and was similar to that for BaTaO2N (KCl) (Supplementary Fig. 12c). From the comparison of XRD patterns (Supplementary Fig. 13a), background absorption in UV–vis DRS (Supplementary Fig. 13b), and XPS analysis (Supplementary Fig. 11), RbCl flux-assisted nitridation process enabled the formation of well-crystallized BaTaO2N with minimized defects (reduced Ta5+ species and anion vacancies)24,34. Moreover, the amount of alkali metal ions incorporated in the BaTaO2N materials during the flux-assisted nitridation became less with the increase of their ionic radii (Supplementary Table 5 and Supplementary Fig. 11). The incorporation of alkali metal ions would induce charge imbalance and defects in the BaTaO2N material, thus leading to less efficient photoexcited charge carrier transfer. These results indicate that the low density of structural defects and mid-gap states in BaTaO2N (RbCl) were key to suppressing charge recombination and facilitating the transfer of photoexcited electrons to the Pt cocatalyst for efficient H2 evolution. In contrast, uniform dispersion of Pt nanoparticles on BaTaO2N (NaCl) and BaTaO2N (CsCl) photocatalysts was not realized by photodeposition even if Pt nuclei were introduced as electron-extracting sites by the first impregnation–reduction treatment (Supplementary Fig. 10), because of the presence of defect states in BaTaO2N which prevented effective utilization of photoexcited charge carriers.
Photocatalytic Z-scheme overall water splitting
Because of the efficient H2-evolution performance of BaTaO2N (RbCl) decorated with Pt by the two-step procedure, photocatalytic Z-scheme water splitting was investigated using this photocatalyst as a HEP. When combined with surface-treated WO342,43 as the OEP and IO3−/I− as a redox mediator, BaTaO2N loaded with Pt by the two-step decoration method exhibited higher photocatalytic activity in Z-scheme water splitting than Pt-loaded BaTaO2N photocatalysts produced by the individual impregnation–reduction method or the photodeposition method, even though the Pt loading amounts were varied (Fig. 5a). The H2 evolution activities of various Pt-modified BaTaO2N were well correlated in Z-scheme water splitting and half-reactions using sacrificial methanol (Fig. 1a) or NaI aqueous solutions (Supplementary Fig. 14). Furthermore, the H2 evolution rate for various Pt-modified BaTaO2N samples from a NaI solution was lower than the O2 evolution rate of WO3 from a NaIO3 solution (Supplementary Fig. 14), indicating that the rate-determining step for this Z-scheme water splitting is still the generation of H2 on Pt-modified BaTaO2N. Therefore, the improvement in Z-scheme water-splitting activity chiefly resulted from the high quality of the single-crystalline BaTaO2N photocatalyst, as well as the fine structure of the nanoparticulate Pt cocatalyst afforded by the sequential decoration procedure.
Figure 5b shows the H2 and O2 evolution during Z-scheme water splitting using BaTaO2N decorated with Pt by the two-step procedure as the HEP, surface-treated WO3 as the OEP, and IO3–/I− as the redox mediator under visible-light (λ ≥ 420 nm) irradiation. The total amount of gas was calculated from the gas evolution during light irradiation with regular evacuation every 30 min (Supplementary Fig. 15a). Both H2 and O2 were stably evolved at a near-stoichiometric molar ratio of 2:1 without obvious deactivation under visible light. The evolution of N2 was not detected, indicating negligible deterioration of Pt-decorated BaTaO2N over 10 h. The Z-scheme water splitting also occurred stably under simulated sunlight (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 15b). The STH of this redox-mediated Z-scheme system was 0.24%. It is worth noting that the dependence of Z-scheme water-splitting activity on the concentration of introduced I− anions under visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) and under simulated sunlight were not identical (Supplementary Fig. 16). This is because the light excitation conditions influence the carrier dynamics in the photocatalysts and the subsequent redox reaction kinetics on their surfaces10,44. The AQY value for this Z-scheme water-splitting system was 4.0% at 420 nm (±25 nm) for optimized conditions under monochromatic light (Supplementary Table 6), which is six times higher than that for the previously reported BaTaO2N-based Z-scheme water-splitting system (AQY of 0.6% at 420 − 440 nm, see Supplementary Table 1)45. These AQY and STH values are still behind those of Z-scheme systems constructed with RhyCr2–yO3-loaded ZrO2-modified TaON (AQY of 10.3% at 420 nm)10 or Ru-modified SrTiO3:La, Rh (AQY of 33% at 419 nm and STH of 1.1%)12 as the HEPs (see Supplementary Table 1). We also note that the water-splitting activity of the present Z-scheme system decreased by 30% during continuous illumination for more than 50 h (Supplementary Fig. 17). Moreover, the Z-scheme water-splitting activity dropped with increasing reaction system pressure (Supplementary Fig. 18). This is due in part to rapid water formation from the H2 and O2 products (Supplementary Fig. 19), probably on the bare Pt cocatalyst. In addition, the competition between reverse reactions from redox mediators also hinders the intrinsic performance of such Pt-modified BaTaO2N in the Z-scheme water-splitting system (Supplementary Fig. 20). Thus, improvements in the durability and reaction selectivity, apart from the innovation of photocatalyst preparation and cocatalyst loading protocols, still need to be pursued. Nevertheless, this is by far the most efficient bias-free Z-scheme water-splitting system involving particulate photocatalysts harvesting visible light up to 650 nm. The activation of such 600-nm-class photocatalysts is key to the future development of particulate water-splitting systems. Further improvements in BaTaO2N-based Z-scheme water-splitting efficiency are expected by refining the preparation of the BaTaO2N photocatalyst, replacing the WO3 OEP with a wide wavelength visible-light-harvesting photocatalyst, and exploring effective redox mediators or solid conductive mediators.
In summary, stepwise loading of a Pt cocatalyst by impregnation–reduction and subsequent photodeposition remarkably enhanced the photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of single-crystalline particulate BaTaO2N with an absorption edge of 650 nm. The sequential decoration method produced highly dispersed and uniformly sized Pt active sites firmly on BaTaO2N, enabling the rapid transfer of photogenerated electrons across the interface and an active H2-evolution reaction on the surface. As a result, the high-quality BaTaO2N photocatalyst loaded sequentially with a Pt cocatalyst exhibited an AQY of 6.8 ± 0.5% at 420 nm for photocatalytic H2 evolution from a sacrificial methanol aqueous solution, and an AQY of 4.0% at 420 nm and an STH of 0.24% in Z-scheme water splitting. This is the most efficient solar water-splitting process involving a 600-nm-class particulate photocatalyst without any external bias. Sequential cocatalyst decoration onto single-crystalline oxynitride photocatalysts enables efficient utilization of photoexcited electrons and will contribute to the development of efficient solar-to-chemical energy conversion systems based on narrow-bandgap photocatalysts.
Methods
Synthesis of BaTaO2N particulate photocatalyst
BaTaO2N powder was synthesized by flux-assisted one-pot nitridation24,34. Ta2O5 (99.9%; Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd.) and BaCO3 (99.9%; Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.) were mixed at a Ta:Ba molar ratio of 1:1.1. Excess Ba was added to compensate for losses by volatilization at high temperatures. NaCl (99.0 + %; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.), KCl (99.0 + %; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.), RbCl (95.0 + %; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) or CsCl (99.0 + %; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) was added as a flux reagent at a solute concentration of 10 mol%, where the solute concentration is defined as the molar ratio of BaTaO2N to the total amount of BaTaO2N and the flux. After grinding of the reagents in an agate mortar for 30 min, the mixture was transferred into an alumina tube and nitrided at 1223 K for 8 h under a flow of gaseous NH3 at 200 mL min−1. The BaTaO2N obtained in this manner was washed with ultrapure water at 343 K for 2 h and filtered thrice to remove any residual flux reagents. The powder was then completely dried at room temperature overnight.
Modification of BaTaO2N photocatalyst with Pt cocatalyst
Modification of the BaTaO2N photocatalyst with Pt cocatalysts was conducted by a two-step decoration method. Firstly, a certain amount of Pt cocatalyst was loaded on the BaTaO2N photocatalyst by impregnation followed by H2-reduction treatment. BaTaO2N powder was immersed in an aqueous solution containing the required amount of H2PtCl6·6H2O (>98.5%; Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.) as a Pt precursor. The slurry was continuously stirred with strong sonication for 5 min to completely disperse the BaTaO2N powder in the H2PtCl6 solution. After the slurry was dried in a hot water bath, the resulting powdered mixture was heated at 473 K for 1 h under a flow of mixed H2 and N2 gases (H2: 20 mL min−1 and N2: 200 mL min−1) to form small metallic Pt grains on the surface of the BaTaO2N photocatalyst. Subsequently, an additional amount of Pt cocatalyst was loaded on the Pt-impregnated BaTaO2N by the photodeposition process. This was accomplished by dispersing Pt-impregnated BaTaO2N powder in 150 mL of an aqueous methanol solution (10 vol%) containing the required amount of Pt precursor. The pH of this solution was not adjusted and the temperature was maintained at 288 K by circulating cooling water. The suspension was evacuated to completely remove dissolved air and then exposed to visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) with continuous stirring. The H2 gas evolved during the photodeposition process was detected by gas chromatography as described in the experimental section for photocatalytic H2 production reaction. For comparison, a certain amount of Pt cocatalyst was loaded on pristine BaTaO2N by the individual impregnation–reduction method or the individual photodeposition method. The procedures for each individual method were the same as in the two-step decoration method. To reveal the location of cocatalyst species deposited during the photodeposition process in the two-step decoration method, Pd particles were loaded on pristine BaTaO2N and Pt-impregnated BaTaO2N photocatalysts by photodeposition for 1 h using PdCl2 (99.9%; FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) as the precursor. The introduced Pd amount was 0.2 wt% with respect to the BaTaO2N photocatalysts. Moreover, pristine BaTaO2N powder was subjected to reduction treatment at 473 K for 1 h under a flow of mixed H2 and N2 gases (H2: 20 mL min−1 and N2: 200 mL min−1) without the introduction of Pt species. Then Pt particles were loaded on the H2-treated BaTaO2N by the same photodeposition method.
Surface treatment of WO3 photocatalyst
Surface-treated WO3 for Z-scheme water splitting was prepared in the following procedure42,43. PtOx (0.5 wt% as Pt) was loaded on WO3 (99.99%, Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd.) by immersing WO3 powder in an aqueous H2PtCl6 solution, followed by calcination in air at 823 K for 0.5 h. The obtained PtOx-loaded WO3 was then impregnated in a Cs2CO3 (97%, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.) solution with a molar ratio of Cs to W of 1%. After calcination in air at 773 K for 10 min, the Cs+-treated and PtOx-loaded WO3 were soaked in 1 M H2SO4 solution with vigorous stirring for 1 h in order to adequately induce ion-exchange reactions. Finally, the resulting powder was collected by filtration and dried in air at room temperature overnight.
Characterization of material
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired using a Rigaku MiniFlex 300 powder diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation, operating at 30 kV and 30 mA. UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were recorded with a spectrophotometer (V-670, JASCO) equipped with an integrating sphere, with a Spectralon standard as a reference for baseline correction. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained on the Hitachi SU8020 system and JEOL JSM-7500FA. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were conducted with a JEM-2800 system (JEOL) and an X-MAX 100TLE SDD detector (Oxford Instruments). The binding energies were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on a PHI Quantera II spectrometer with an Al Kα X-ray source and normalized to C 1 s for each sample. The elemental analysis was performed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Thermo Fischer Scientific, iCAP 7600duo) and oxygen/nitrogen/hydrogen (ONH) analysis (LECO Corporation, TCH600).
Microsecond transient absorption (TA) measurements were performed using a Nd:YAG laser system (Continuum, Surelite I; duration: 6 ns) with custom-built spectrometers35. The IR probe light emitted from the MoSi2 coil was focused on the sample and then the transmitted light was introduced to a grating spectrometer, which allowed measurement of probe energies from 6000 cm−1 (1667 nm, 0.74 eV) to 1000 cm−1 (10 μm, 0.12 eV). The monochromated light was detected by a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector (Kolmar). For the visible and NIR region from 20000 cm−1 (500 nm, 2.47 eV) to 6000 cm−1 (1667 nm, 0.74 eV), the measurements were carried out in reflection mode, i.e., the reflected light from the sample entered the grating spectrometer and was then detected by Si photodetectors. The output electric signal was amplified with an AC-coupled amplifier (Stanford Research Systems, SR560, 1 MHz), which can measure responses on a timescale of one microsecond to milliseconds. Laser pulses (480 nm, 3 mJ pulse−1) were used to excite pristine BaTaO2N and Pt-loaded BaTaO2N photocatalysts via bandgap transitions. The time resolution of the spectrometer was limited to 1 μs by the response of photodetectors. The output electric signal was amplified using AC-coupled amplifier with a bandwidth of 1 MHz, which can measure responses in the timescale of one microsecond to milliseconds. One thousand responses were accumulated to obtain the intensity trace at a single wavenumber or a decay curve. In order to rule out thermal effects or IR emission, the absorption spectra and absorbance changes were determined after subtracting the measurements without probe light. The experiments were performed in a vacuum at room temperature.
Photocatalytic reactions of H2 evolution, O2 evolution, and Z-scheme water splitting
Photocatalytic H2 evolution reactions were carried out in a Pyrex top-illuminated reaction vessel connected to a closed gas-circulation system. A Pt-loaded BaTaO2N photocatalyst was dispersed in 150 mL of aqueous methanol solution or aqueous NaI solution. The pH of this solution was not adjusted and the temperature was maintained at 288 K by circulating cooling water. After completely removing air from the reaction slurry by evacuation, the suspension was irradiated with a 300 W Xenon lamp equipped with a cold mirror and a cut-off filter (L42, λ ≥ 420 nm). The reactant solution was maintained at 288 K by a cooling water system during the reaction. The evolved gas products were analyzed using an integrated thermal conductivity detector-gas chromatography system (TCD–GC) consisting of a GC-8A chromatograph (Shimadzu Corp.) equipped with a Molecular Sieve 5 Å column, with argon as the carrier gas. The sensitivity of the TCD was calibrated by analyzing known amounts of gas introduced into the fully evacuated reaction system containing reaction solutions under illumination. For the O2 evolution reaction, surface-treated WO3 was dispersed in 150 mL of aqueous NaIO3 solution (20 mM). The reaction trial was performed in the same system with the same procedure as for the hydrogen-evolution reactions.
Z-scheme water-splitting reactions were carried out in a Pyrex top-illuminated reaction vessel connected to a closed gas-circulation system or a gas-flow system. Pt-loaded BaTaO2N as the HEP and surface-treated WO3 as the OEP was dispersed in 150 mL of an aqueous solution containing NaI at a certain concentration. The pH of the solution was not adjusted. After completely removing air from the reaction slurry by evacuation, the suspension was irradiated by a 300 W Xenon lamp equipped with a cold mirror and a cut-off filter (L42, λ ≥ 420 nm) or by a solar simulator (SAN-EI electronic, XES40S1, AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2). For the reaction under simulated sunlight, the top window of the reaction vessel was covered with a mask to confine the irradiated sample area to 7.6 cm2. The reactant solution was maintained at 288 K by a cooling water system during the reaction. The reaction system was periodically evacuated at an interval of 30 min. The gas products evolved during each 30 min irradiation period were analyzed using the integrated TCD–GC. In the experiments using a gas flow system, a designated amount of Ar gas was fed to the reaction suspension, and the reaction suspension was evacuated with a dry pump (ULVAC, DOP-40D) through a vacuum regulator (Koganei, NVR200) and a sampling valve (GL Sciences, AU-CF-6J) that was controlled by a remote timer (GL Sciences, RT731A). The pressure of the suspension was monitored using a vacuum gauge inserted just upstream of the reactor. The gas products were detected by the integrated TCD–GC that was calibrated at the respective pressures.
Solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency measurements
The water-splitting reaction was performed under simulated solar irradiation. The solar-to-hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiency is given by Eq. (1):
1 |
where R(H2), ΔGr, P, and S denote the rate of hydrogen evolution during the Z-scheme overall water-splitting reaction, the Gibbs energy for the reaction H2O(l) → H2(g) + 1/2O2(g), the energy intensity of the AM1.5 G solar irradiation (100 mW cm−2), and the irradiated sample area (7.6 cm2), respectively. The value of ΔGr used for the calculations was 237 kJ mol−1 at 288 K. Because the O2 evolution rate was slightly deficient compared to that for stoichiometric water splitting, R(H2) used in this STH calculation was the average of the H2 evolution rate and twice the O2 evolution rate.
Apparent quantum yield measurement
The apparent quantum yield (AQY) for photocatalytic reaction is given by Eq. (2):
2 |
where R and I represent the rate of gas evolution and the incident photon flux, respectively. A is the number of electrons consumed to generate one molecule of H2, and is 2 for photocatalytic hydrogen production from sacrificial methanol solution, and 4 for Z-scheme water splitting based on two-step photoexcitation. The photocatalytic reaction and measurement of the number of incident photons were carried out using the same light source equipped with various band-pass filters. The number of incident photons illuminating the reaction cell was measured using a grating spectroradiometer.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Artificial Photosynthesis Project of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). A part of this work was conducted at the Advanced Characterization Nanotechnology Platform of the University of Tokyo, supported by the Nanotechnology Platform of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan (grant number: JPMXP09A-19-UT-0023). The authors thank Ms. Michiko Obata of Shinshu University for her assistance with XPS measurements.
Source data
Author contributions
Z.W., Y.L., K.T. and K.D. designed the research. Z.W. and Y.L. conducted the photocatalyst material fabrications, cocatalyst modifications, photocatalytic H2 production reactions, Z-scheme overall water-splitting reactions, XRD, UV–vis DRS, and SEM characterizations. Z.W. and T.H. conducted XPS measurements. J.M.V. and A.Y. carried out the TAS experiments and analyzed the resulting data. Z.W., Y.L., S.C. and L.L. performed AQY and STH measurements. M.N and N.S. conducted HRTEM and HRTEM-EDS measurements. N.K. carried out ICP-AES measurements. T.H., S.S., K.T. and K.D. supervised the entire research work. Z.W., Y.L, T.H., J.M.V., S.S., S.C., Z.P., T.T., K.T. and K.D. discussed the results. Z.W., Y.L, T.H., K.T. and K.D. wrote and revised the paper with contributions from the other authors.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Geoffrey Hyett and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Zheng Wang, Ying Luo.
Contributor Information
Katsuya Teshima, Email: teshima@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Kazunari Domen, Email: domen@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-21284-3.
References
- 1.Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:253–278. doi: 10.1039/B800489G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pinaud BA, et al. Technical and economic feasibility of centralized facilities for solar hydrogen production via photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:1983–2002. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40831k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hisatomi T, Domen K. Reaction systems for solar hydrogen production via water splitting with particulate semiconductor photocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:387–399. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0242-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chandran RB, Breen S, Shao Y, Ardo S, Weber AZ. Evaluating particle-suspension reactor designs for Z-scheme solar water splitting via transport and kinetic modeling. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018;11:115–135. doi: 10.1039/C7EE01360D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao Y, et al. A hydrogen farm strategy for scalable solar hydrogen production with particulate photocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:9653–9658. doi: 10.1002/anie.202001438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jia J, et al. Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30% Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13237. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pan L, et al. Cu2O photocathodes with band-tail states assisted hole transport for standalone solar water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13987-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takata T, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting with a quantum efficiency of almost unity. Nature. 2020;581:411–414. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Y, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting by N-TiO2 on MgO (111) with exceptional quantum efficiencies at elevated temperatures. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4421. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12385-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qi Y, et al. Redox-based visible-light-driven Z-scheme overall water splitting with apparent quantum efficiency exceeding 10% Joule. 2018;2:2393–2402. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Z, et al. Overall water splitting by Ta3N5 nanorod single crystals grown on the edges of KTaO3 particles. Nat. Catal. 2018;1:756–763. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0134-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Q, et al. Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1% Nat. Mater. 2016;15:611–615. doi: 10.1038/nmat4589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goto Y, et al. A Particulate photocatalyst water-splitting panel for large-scale solar hydrogen generation. Joule. 2018;2:509–520. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Y, et al. Mimicking natural photosynthesis: solar to renewable H2 fuel synthesis by Z‑scheme water splitting systems. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:5201–5241. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Higashi M, Abe R, Takata T, Domen K. Photocatalytic overall water splitting under visible light using ATaO2N (A = Ca, Sr, Ba) and WO3 in a IO3−/I− shuttle redox mediated system. Chem. Mater. 2009;21:1543–1549. doi: 10.1021/cm803145n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong B, et al. Heterostructure of 1D Ta3N5 nanorod/BaTaO2N nanoparticle fabricated by a one-step ammonia thermal route for remarkably promoted solar hydrogen production. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1808185. doi: 10.1002/adma.201808185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Qi Y, et al. Achievement of visible-light-driven Z-scheme overall water splitting using barium-modified Ta3N5 as a H2-evolving photocatalyst. Chem. Sci. 2017;8:437–443. doi: 10.1039/C6SC02750D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun S, et al. Efficient redox-mediator-free Z‑scheme water splitting employing oxysulfide photocatalysts under visible light. ACS Catal. 2018;8:1690–1696. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shirakawa T, Higashi M, Tomita O, Abe R. Surface-modified metal sulfides as stable H2-evolving photocatalysts in Z-scheme water splitting with a [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox mediator under visible-light irradiation. Sustain. Energy Fuels. 2017;1:1065–1073. doi: 10.1039/C7SE00151G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Iwase A, et al. Water splitting and CO2 reduction under visible light irradiation using Z‑scheme systems consisting of metal sulfides, CoOx-loaded BiVO4, and a reduced graphene oxide electron mediator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:10260–10264. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abe R, Shinmei K, Koumura N, Hara K, Ohtani B. Visible-light-induced water splitting based on two-step photoexcitation between dye-sensitized layered niobate and tungsten oxide photocatalysts in the presence of a triiodide/iodide shuttle redox mediator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:16872–16884. doi: 10.1021/ja4048637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dong B, et al. Synthesis of BaTaO2N oxynitride from Ba-rich oxide precursor for construction of visible-light-driven Z-scheme overall water splitting. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:10707–10713. doi: 10.1039/C7DT00854F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maeda K, Lu D, Domen K. Solar-driven Z‑scheme water splitting using modified BaZrO3-BaTaO2N solid solutions as photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2013;3:1026–1033. doi: 10.1021/cs400156m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Luo Y, et al. Construction of spatial charge separation facets on BaTaO2N crystals by flux growth approach for visible-light-driven H2 production. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:22264–22271. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b03747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maeda K, Domen K. Water oxidation using a particulate BaZrO3-BaTaO2N solid-solution photocatalyst that operates under a wide range of visible light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:9865–9869. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang H, Wei S, Xu X. Mg modified BaTaO2N as an efficient visible-light-active photocatalyst for water oxidation. J. Catal. 2020;383:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jadhav S, et al. Efficient photocatalytic oxygen evolution using BaTaO2N obtained from nitridation of perovskite-type oxide. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8:1127–1130. doi: 10.1039/C9TA10684G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xu Y, et al. Strategies for efficient charge separation and transfer in artificial photosynthesis of solar fuels. ChemSusChem. 2017;10:4277–4305. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yang J, Wang D, Han H, Li C. Roles of cocatalysts in photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013;46:1900–1909. doi: 10.1021/ar300227e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bai S, Yin W, Wang L, Li Z, Xiong Y. Surface and interface design in cocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction. RSC Adv. 2016;6:57446–57463. doi: 10.1039/C6RA10539D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ran J, Zhang J, Yu J, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ. Earth-abundant cocatalysts for semiconductor-based photocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:7787–7812. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60425J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ida S, et al. A cocatalyst that stabilizes a hydride intermediate during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over a rhodium-doped TiO2 nanosheet. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:9073–9077. doi: 10.1002/anie.201803214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li R, et al. Spatial separation of photogenerated electrons and holes among {010} and {110} crystal facets of BiVO4. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1432. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Luo Y, et al. Fabrication of single-crystalline BaTaO2N from chloride fluxes for photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020;20:255–261. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamakata A, et al. Behavior and energy states of photogenerated charge carriers on Pt- or CoOx‑loaded LaTiO2N photocatalysts: time-resolved visible to mid-infrared absorption study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:23897–23906. doi: 10.1021/jp508233z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kosco J, et al. The effect of residual palladium catalyst contamination on the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity of conjugated polymers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018;8:1802181. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201802181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kamat PV. Manipulation of charge transfer across semiconductor interface. A criterion that cannot be ignored in photocatalyst design. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:663–672. doi: 10.1021/jz201629p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shiraishi Y, et al. Platinum nanoparticles strongly associated with graphitic carbon nitride as efficient co-catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:15255–15258. doi: 10.1039/C4CC06960A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vamvasakis I, Liu B, Armatas GS. Size effects of platinum nanoparticles in the photocatalytic hydrogen production over 3D mesoporous networks of CdS and Pt nanojunctions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26:8062–8071. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201603292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wachtler M, Kalisman P, Amirav L. Charge-transfer dynamics in nanorod photocatalysts with bimetallic metal tips. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:24491–24497. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lykhach Y, et al. Counting electrons on supported nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2016;15:284–288. doi: 10.1038/nmat4500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Miseki Y, Kusama H, Sugihara H, Sayama K. Cs-modified WO3 photocatalyst showing efficient solar energy conversion for O2 production and Fe (III) ion reduction under visible light. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010;1:1196–1200. doi: 10.1021/jz100233w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Miseki Y, Fujiyoshi S, Gunji T, Sayama K. Photocatalytic water splitting under visible light utilizing I3−/I− and IO3−/I−redox mediators by Z-scheme system using surface treated PtOx/WO3 as O2 evolution photocatalyst. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013;3:1750–1756. doi: 10.1039/c3cy00055a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maeda K, Higashi M, Lu D, Abe R, Domen K. Efficient nonsacrificial water splitting through two-step photoexcitation by visible light using a modified oxynitride as a hydrogen evolution photocatalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:5858–5868. doi: 10.1021/ja1009025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Matoba T, Maeda K, Domen K. Activation of BaTaO2N photocatalyst for enhanced non-sacrificial hydrogen evolution from water under visible light by forming a solid solution with BaZrO3. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:14731–14735. doi: 10.1002/chem.201102970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.