Abstract
Aim:
This study was designed to perform network analysis of Alzheimers҆ disease and diabetes and to find their correlation with each other and other diseases/pathways.
Background:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as a neurodegenerative disease and diabetes as a metabolic disease are two major health problems in the recent years. The recent studies have reported their correlation and same spreading pathways of these two diseases together, but details of this relation are not well known yet at molecular level..
Methods:
In thermal proteome profiling (TPP) technique, after treatment of the extracted proteins by heat and drug concentration, the resulting proteins were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Enrichment analysis of these proteins led to development of AD and diabetes. First, corresponding genes for each disease were extracted from DisGeNET database and then, protein-protein interaction network was constructed for each of them using the search tool for retrieval of interacting genes and proteins (STRING). After analyzing these networks, hub-bottleneck nodes of networks were evaluated. Also, common nodes between two networks were extracted and used for further analysis.
Results:
High correlation was found between AD and diabetes based on the existence of 40 common genes. Results of analyses revealed 14 genes in AD and 12 genes in diabetes as hub-bottleneck 7 of which were common including caspase 3 (CASP3), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), catalase (CAT), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), leptin (LEP), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and interleukin 6 ( IL-6).
Conclusion:
Our results revealed a direct correlation between AD and diabetes and also a correlation between these two diseases and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), suggesting that a small change in each of these three diseases can lead to development of any other diseases in the patients. Also, the enrichments exhibited the existence of common pathways between AD, diabetes, NAFLD, and male infertility.
Key Words: NAFLD, Alzheimer's disease, Diabetes mellitus, Type II, Male infertility, Bioinformatics
Introduction
Recently, the correlation between different diseases and the risk factors that may cause various diseases have become a controversial issue. Thus, development of a reliable technique for detecting protein-protein interaction can be a big revolution in this field. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as a neurodegenerative disease has been one of the major health problems in the recent years. The Alzheimer’s disease International (ADI) federation has reported that at least 46.8 million people have been affected by dementia and this figure has been anticipated to increase by 74.7 million by 2030 and 131.5 million by 2050, respectively (1). AD is thought to develop 20 years or more before manifestation of the symptoms (2-4), along with small changes in the brain that are unnoticeable to the affected person. The first symptoms of this disease are memory loss and language problems, occurring as a result of destroying or damaging nerve cells (neurons) in parts of the brain involved in thinking, learning ,and memory (cognitive function) (5). It has been shown that besides age and heredity, lifestyle is an important effector in progression of AD (6).
On the other hand, lifestyle has major effects on development of some other diseases, i.e., obesity, fatty liver, and diabetes (7). Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous metabolic disorder characterized by the presence of hyperglycemia due to deterioration of insulin secretion, defective insulin action, or both. Majority of diabetes cases are divided into two categories, type 1 and type 2. There are some cases ,which are difficult to be classified ,such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), genetic mutations, diseases of the exocrine pancreas (such as cystic fibrosis) ,and other diseases or drug exposure (such as glucocorticoids, medications for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)/ acquired immunodeficiency syndrome(AIDS), and atypical antipsychotics) (8).
Many studies have been conducted on insulin signaling in the brain during normal adulthood and aging and in the individuals with AD. But, there is limited information on molecular correlation between AD and diabetes. However, several studies have established the direct effect of diabetes on AD (9-11). Much information is available regarding biology of each of these diseases separately, and there is an increasing interest for recognizing their pathophysiological intersection (12). In our previous study, both of these diseases were enriched by identifying the targets of Celecoxib using thermal proteome profiling (TPP). As a recently introduced proteomics technology, TPP demonstrates the potential for proteome profiling for large-scale analysis of proteome-ligand interactions including endogenous ligands, such as cofactors or metabolites, and other protein modifications. TPP facilitates identification of markers for drug efficacy and toxicity and provides an unbiased measure of drug-target engagement. As a mass spectrometry-based technique, TPP provides a rationale for adverse clinical observations and suggests repurposing of the drug for treatment of other diseases (13, 14).
Considering accuracy of TPP technique and detecting AD and diabetes in our previous study, herein it was attempted to analyze the correlation between these two widespread diseases.
Methods
The hippocampi of 5 male Rattus norvegicus, weighing 200 +/-10 g were separated and homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer and finally, were centrifuged in 20,000 g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant containing proteins was carefully separated from precipitates and concentration of protein solution was determined by Bradford assay. Then, the TPP procedure was done using Celecoxib concentrations of 20, 10, 5, 1, and 0.1µM, based on the protocols of TPP (13-16). Finally, the solarized proteins were extracted and fractionated by NanoDrop device. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry-based laboratory protocol (17, 18). Following identification of proteins using the existing databases, enrichment analysis was used to determine the role of the protein set in different diseases using the Enrichr web tool (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/Enrichr/). This online database contains many different libraries, and the effect of genes on pathways, disease, and phenotypes is determined by entering the list of genes (ref Enrichr). The effects of the identified proteins on different processes were determined using this database. Considering high P-value of AD and diabetes, the correlation between these two diseases was investigated in the DisGeNET database. DisGeNET is a comprehensive discovery database providing information on the association of genes and variants with human diseases (19). The related genes of AD and diabetes were extracted from the DisGeNET platform and were used for further analysis. PPI network of each disease was constructed by the search tool for retrieval of interacting genes/proteins (STRING). STRING is a discovery platform, predicting protein-protein interactions (20). The resulting networks were imported in Cytoscape software, and the ClusterONE algorithm identified their topology properties as a plugin of this software (21). The relation between common genes and pathway enrichment was accomplished using ClueGO and CluePedia plugins of Cytoscape software (22, 23). An R package named as CINNA was used to find the best centrality method for selecting the most critical nodes (24, 25).
Every network contains nodes (such as genes or proteins) and edges/links (e.g., co-expression relationships or physical interactions) as their connections. Degree and betweenness are important centrality parameters in network biology that are useful for analyzing network topology. The term degree indicates edges/links of a node. Nodes with high degree values are called as hubs, and nodes achieving top-ten or top-five % of betweenness centrality are called as bottlenecks. So, hub-bottlenecks are nodes that are simultaneously hubs and bottlenecks. Average degree (A.D) and standard deviation (SD) of degrees were calculated, and nodes with a degree value above 2SD + A.D were selected as hub proteins. Also, the top 5% betweenness centrality measures were chosen as bottleneck proteins. Shared genes, hubs, and bottleneck proteins of these two networks were extracted and used for further analysis. In this study, Cytoscape software was used to analyze networks and extract hubs, hub-bottlenecks, and their first neighbors (26).
Results
After enrichment of the identified proteins from MS by Enrichr web tool, AD (Adj p-value: 0.00089) and diabetes (Adj p-value: 0.022) were identified interestingly. For detecting the correlation between AD and diabetes, the gene sets of these diseases were extracted from DisGeNET database. Based on this database, 386 and 523 related genes were extracted for AD and diabetes, respectively. Constructing PPI networks was done for each disease using STRING. AD network contained 347 nodes 14 of which were identified as hub-bottleneck (Figure 1 and Table 1). On the other hand, diabetes network included 211 nodes 12 of which were detected as hub-bottleneck in this network (Figure 2 and Table 1). Interestingly, 7 of these hub-bottlenecks were common between two networks including caspase 3(CASP3), insulin-like growth factor 1(IGF1), catalase (CAT), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), leptin (LEP), vascular endothelial growth factor A(VEGFA) ,and interleukin 6(IL-6). Also, 40 proteins were shared proteins between networks; their roles were analyzed via the ClueGO plugin (Table 2, Figure 3). Enrichment analysis showed 34 pathways in overall 15 of which were from the Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) database, 5 of which were enriched via Reactome database and 14 pathways were identified by the WikiPathways database.
Figure 1.
PPI network for AD. This network includes 14 hub-bottlenecks (highlighted with green color) 7 of which are common with the identified hub-bottlenecks of diabetes, indicated with triangle
Table 1.
Enriched hub-bottlenecks in AD and diabetes. Similar hub-bottlenecks are shown by asterisk
Disease | Name | Degree | Betweenness centrality |
---|---|---|---|
AD | CASP3* | 84 | 0.017712 |
AD | BDNF | 84 | 0.022581 |
AD | GAPDH | 129 | 0.074805 |
AD | APP | 140 | 0.085575 |
AD | IGF1* | 76 | 0.009626 |
AD | INS | 153 | 0.099242 |
AD | CAT* | 72 | 0.016219 |
AD | LEP* | 73 | 0.01045 |
AD | TNF* | 104 | 0.025062 |
AD | IL-6* | 121 | 0.032354 |
AD | APOE | 135 | 0.074739 |
AD | VEGFA* | 90 | 0.020626 |
AD | TLR4 | 74 | 0.016169 |
AD | CLU | 76 | 0.022463 |
Diabetes | TNF* | 103 | 0.050838 |
Diabetes | TP53 | 102 | 0.094941 |
Diabetes | CASP3* | 84 | 0.027162 |
Diabetes | PPARG | 75 | 0.029648 |
Diabetes | CAT* | 73 | 0.027995 |
Diabetes | LEP* | 75 | 0.025842 |
Diabetes | IGF1* | 75 | 0.014226 |
Diabetes | NOS3 | 71 | 0.018537 |
Diabetes | VEGFA* | 87 | 0.036401 |
Diabetes | MAPK1 | 85 | 0.03988 |
Diabetes | MAPK3 | 101 | 0.049828 |
Diabetes | IL-6* | 101 | 0.052281 |
Figure 2.
PPI network for diabetes. This network includes 12 hub-bottlenecks (highlighted with red color) 7 of which are common with the identified hub-bottlenecks of diabetes, indicated with triangle
Table 2.
Enriched pathways by the shared proteins between AD and diabetes. The results were extracted from 3 databases: KEGG, WikiPathways, and Reactome databases
Ontology source | GOTerm | Adjusted P-value | Associated genes |
---|---|---|---|
KEGG | Adipocytokine signaling pathway | 1.13778E-11 | ADIPOQ, LEP, LEPR, NPY, PCK1, PPARA, PPARGC1A, SLC2A4, TNF |
Advanced glycation end products(AGE)-receptor of AGE(RAGE) signaling pathway in diabetes complications | 7.53638E-12 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, IL-1B, IL-6, NOS3, PIK3R1, TGFB1, TNF, VEGFA | |
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway | 1.11028E-12 | ADIPOQ, IGF1, INSR, LEP, LEPR, PCK1, PIK3R1, PPARG, PPARGC1A, SIRT1, SLC2A4 | |
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) | 5.99784E-06 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, CAT, TNF | |
Apoptosis | 1.78131E-06 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, FAS, NGF, PIK3R1, TNF | |
Fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis | 1.94221E-10 | BCL2, CAV1, CYBA, HMOX1, IL-1B, NOS3, NQO1, PIK3R1, TNF, VEGFA | |
FoxO signaling pathway | 1.09653E-10 | CAT, IGF1, IL-6, INSR, PCK1, PIK3R1, SIRT1, SLC2A4, SOD2, TGFB1 | |
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1(HIF-1) signaling pathway | 2.35735E-08 | BCL2, HMOX1, IGF1, IL-6, INSR, NOS3, PIK3R1, VEGFA | |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) | 2.93532E-05 | ACE, IGF1, IL-6, TGFB1, TNF | |
Insulin resistance | 6.54836E-10 | IL-6, INSR, NOS3, PCK1, PIK3R1, PPARA, PPARGC1A, SLC2A4, TNF | |
Longevity regulating pathway | 2.31646E-12 | ADIPOQ, BAX, CAT, IGF1, INSR, PIK3R1, PPARG, PPARGC1A, SIRT1, SOD2 | |
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) | 7.09E-15 | ADIPOQ, BAX, CASP3, FAS, IL1B, IL-6, INSR, LEP, LEPR, PIK3R1, PPARA, TGFB1, TNF | |
p53 signaling pathway | 1.3591E-05 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, FAS, IGF1 | |
TNF signaling pathway | 6.98289E-06 | CASP3, FAS, IL-1B, IL-6, PIK3R1, TNF | |
Type II diabetes mellitus | 2.81374E-06 | ADIPOQ, INSR, PIK3R1, SLC2A4, TNF | |
Reactome | FOXO-mediated transcription | 2.09583E-08 | CAT, CAV1, NPY, PCK1, PPARGC1A, SIRT1, SOD2 |
FOXO-mediated transcription of oxidative stress, metabolic and neuronal genes | 4.15153E-07 | CAT, NPY, PCK1, PPARGC1A, SOD2 | |
Interleukin 4(IL-4) and interleukin 13(IL-13) signaling | 2.25725E-08 | BCL2, HMOX1, IL-1B, IL-6, PIK3R1, TGFB1, TNF, VEGFA | |
Transcriptional regulation of white adipocyte differentiation | 6.99501E-11 | ADIPOQ, LEP, PCK1, PPARA, PPARG, PPARGC1A, SLC2A4, TGFB1, TNF | |
VEGFA-VEGF receptor 2(VEGFR2) pathway | 9.37356E-06 | CAV1, CYBA, NOS3, PIK3R1, VEGFA | |
WikiPathways | Adipogenesis | 6.4079E-14 | ADIPOQ, FAS, IGF1, IL-6, LEP, PCK1, PPARA, PPARG, PPARGC1A, SLC2A4, TGFB1, TNF |
AMPK signaling | 8.09075E-07 | ADIPOQ, INSR, LEP, LEPR, PIK3R1, SLC2A4 | |
ALS | 1.34735E-06 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, CAT, TNF | |
Apoptosis | 1.32024E-07 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, FAS, IGF1, PIK3R1, TNF | |
Folate metabolism | 4.39784E-08 | CAT, IL-1B, IL-6, INSR, MPO, SOD2, TNF | |
Genes involved in male infertility | 1.61695E-08 | ABCB1, BCL2, CAT, FAS, INSR, NOS3, NQO1, SOD2, TNF | |
Hepatitis B infection | 2.8804E-07 | BAX, BCL2, CASP3, FAS, IL-6, PIK3R1, TGFB1, TNF | |
Leptin signaling pathway | 1.30077E-06 | BAX, IL-1B, LEP, LEPR, NOS3, PIK3R1 | |
NAFLD | 1.7843E-14 | ADIPOQ, BAX, CASP3, FAS, IL-1B, IL-6, INSR, LEP, LEPR, PIK3R1, PPARA, TGFB1, TNF | |
Photodynamic therapy-induced activator protein 1(AP-1) survival signaling | 4.08953E-06 | BAX, BCL2, FAS, IL-6, TNF | |
T-Cell antigen receptor (TCR) signaling pathway | 2.47953E-05 | FAS, IL-1B, IL-6, PIK3R1, TGFB1 | |
TNF alpha signaling pathway | 1.45408E-05 | BAX, CASP3, CYBA, IL-6, TNF | |
Transcription factor regulation in adipogenesis | 3.4134E-14 | ADIPOQ, IL-6, INSR, LEP, PPARG, PPARGC1A, SLC2A4, TNF | |
Vitamin B12 metabolism | 2.19331E-07 | IL-1B, IL-6, INSR, MPO, SOD2, TNF |
Figure 3.
Pathways enriched by the common genes between AD and diabetes. AD and diabetes have the highest effect on NAFLD. It can be concluded that NAFLD is a key connector disease between these two diseases
Discussion
PPI network analysis and pathway enrichment as systems biology methods have been used to discover main proteins and pathways underlying complex diseases (27). During this blind study of systems biology, interestingly, AD and diabetes were found in the enriched diseases simultaneously, while the studied tissue was hippocampus. Some important common genes were found by extracting the genes related to these diseases, which were also effective in NAFLD, indicating high correlation between these three diseases.
Many different signaling pathways were detected in this research (Table 1, Figures 1&2). In various studies, FOXO3 has been reported as a susceptible gene for human longevity; by aging or its expression is decreased in AD (28).
Activation of FOXO3 initially acts as a neuroprotective agent; however, later on it plays a role in promoting cell death by upregulating Bim and FasL. Decreasing expression of FOXO3 might be an effective way to prevent or delay irreversible process of neurodegeneration (28). IGF1 as another common known pathway has a similar function to insulin and stimulates glucose transport into the cell (29). It has been reported that IGF1 can influence pathogenesis of AD through regulation of α-/β-secretase activity (30).
IGF1 can influence Aβ clearance from the brain by promoting Aβ transport over the blood-brain barrier, unbalanced β-amyloid, occurring in diabetes is associated with neurite degeneration and neuronal loss (30), highlighting the correlation between AD and diabetes. The other important pathways are TNF and CASP3; both causing cell death. TNF expression is increased in acute and chronic systemic inflammation and there is a direct relation between TNF and CASP3; on the other hand, an increase in TNF expression causes an increase in CASP3 expression (31). An increase in TNF expression causes subsequent cognitive decline and long-term cognitive impairment (32) also causes insulin resistance and diabetes (33). As a key regulator of energy balance, leptin, the other important enriched pathway has been reported to be a helpful gene in AD and diabetes. Pathways activated by leptin in the brain have neuroprotective roles (34) also, leptin may be a potentially useful adjunct to insulin treatment in management of diabetes (35). IL-6 regulates acute-phase responses of cytokines and lymphocyte stimulatory factors. IL-6 has been reported to have two differential roles in modulating insulin sensitivity, an enhancer and an inhibitor of insulin action (36). Increased level of IL-6 is a sign of pathological events including neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration (37). In conclusion, inhibition of IL-6 causes a rationale strategy for targeting onset or further progression of AD (38). Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) are a subfamily of growth factors also enriched in this research and acting as signaling proteins for vasculogenesis and angiogenesis (39). The recent studies have proved that in diabetes, angiogenesis is decreased by inhibition of VEGF through corticosteroids, so the use of anti-VEGF agents is proposed for management of diabetes complications (40). Vascular and AD pathologies are related and the patients with AD carry more functional promoter genes for VEGF, resulting in the elevated levels of VEGF (41). Considering these studies, VEGF have major role in AD as well as diabetes. All these mentioned common genes have a huge effect on both AD and diabetes and small changes in them can influence situation of the patients.
The results of pathway enrichment analysis on common genes between AD and diabetes showed a strong correlation between AD, diabetes, and NAFLD (Fig.2). A close association between AD and NAFLD and diabetes and NAFLD has been proven in the recent studies (42, 43). It is well known that liver has fundamental importance in regulation of metabolism and insulin sensitivity, as well as diabetes (44, 45). Liver dysfunction causes diabetes, on the other hand, there is a direct correlation between diabetes and NAFLD, and as a result, NAFLD is an important risk factor for diabetes (46). Recently, studies have suggested that diabetes could be related to an increased risk for AD (47, 48) still, there is no clear evidence about causative relationship between diabetes and cognitive decline in the patients with AD. (11). Thus, it can be proposed that NAFLD is a key connector disease between AD and diabetes.
The other important pathway is related to the genes involved in male infertility by involvement of 8 common genes between them. Since, glucose metabolism is important for supplying basic cell activity, as well as specific functions, such as motility and fertilization ability in mature sperm, it is also considered as an important event in spermatogenesis (49, 50). Based on the recent evidence, diabetes has a destructive effect on male fertility through influencing sperm motility, sperms҆ DNA integrity, and ingredients of seminal plasma (51, 52). The correlation between AD and male fertility has been proved by the effect of amyloid precursor protein in both diseases, although function of this protein in male fertility is a novel subject and needs more investigations (53). NAFLD is strongly associated with severity of germinal epithelial damage. Additionally, the testis has been identified as a probable target organ for damage caused by NAFLD, suggesting that NAFLD can influence fertility in males through damaging testis (54). According to the previous studies, there is a correlation between AD, NAFLD, and diabetes; also in this study, these diseases were enriched with high possibility.
Altogether, in this research, firstly, a direct correlation was found between AD and diabetes. Following further analysis, connecting function of NAFLD on these two diseases was revealed, which based on the current epidemiologic studies, there was a causative relation between these diseases. Also, the enrichments exhibited the genes involved in male infertility, suggesting the existence of common pathways between AD, diabetes, NAFLD, and male infertility. Clearly, more extensive experimental and clinical studies are needed, in order to clarify molecular correlations between these diseases
Acknowledgment
We would like to express our gratitude for receiving support from Semnan University of medical sciences.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Realdon O, Rossetto F, Nalin M, Baroni I, Cabinio M, Fioravanti R, et al. Technology-enhanced multi-domain at home continuum of care program with respect to usual care for people with cognitive impairment: the Ability-TelerehABILITation study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:425. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1132-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O, et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:357–67. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reiman EM, Quiroz YT, Fleisher AS, Chen K, Velez-Pardo C, Jimenez-Del-Rio M, et al. Brain imaging and fluid biomarker analysis in young adults at genetic risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in the presenilin 1 E280A kindred: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:1048–56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70228-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gordon BA, Blazey TM, Su Y, Hari-Raj A, Dincer A, Flores S, et al. Spatial patterns of neuroimaging biomarker change in individuals from families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:241–50. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30028-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alzheimer’s Association. 2019 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:321–87. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ghareeb DA, Hafez HS, Hussien HM, Kabapy NF. Non-alcoholic fatty liver induces insulin resistance and metabolic disorders with development of brain damage and dysfunction. Metab Brain Dis. 2011;26 doi: 10.1007/s11011-011-9261-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reddy JK, Sambasiva Rao M. Lipid metabolism and liver inflammation. II. Fatty liver disease and fatty acid oxidation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G852–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00521.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:S10–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raisifar Z, Nia AA, Madmoli M, Madmoli Y. The relationship between using insulin and suffering Alzheimer's disease in patients with diabetes: a two-year study. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science (IJEES) 2018;8:623–8. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thomas KR, Bangen KJ, Weigand AJ, Edmonds EC, Sundermann E, Wong CG, et al. Type 2 Diabetes Interacts With Alzheimer Disease Risk Factors to Predict Functional Decline. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020;34:10–7. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li J, Cesari M, Liu F, Dong B, Vellas B. Effects of diabetes mellitus on cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer disease: a systematic review. Can J Diabetes. 2017;41:114–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arnold SE, Arvanitakis Z, Macauley-Rambach SL, Koenig AM, Wang H-Y, Ahima RS, et al. Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: concepts and conundrums. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:168–81. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jafari R, Almqvist H, Axelsson H, Ignatushchenko M, Lundbäck T, Nordlund P, et al. The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:2100. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Savitski MM, Reinhard FB, Franken H, Werner T, Savitski MF, Eberhard D, et al. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome. Science. 2014;346:1255784. doi: 10.1126/science.1255784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dembo G, Park SB, Kharasch ED. Central nervous system concentrations of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in humans. Anesthesiology-Hagerstown. 2005;102:409–15. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Paulson SK, Vaughn MB, Jessen SM, Lawal Y, Gresk CJ, Yan B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of celecoxib after oral administration in dogs and humans: effect of food and site of absorption. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;297:638–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6:359–62. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scifo E, Szwajda A, Soliymani R, Pezzini F, Bianchi M, Dapkunas A, et al. Proteomic analysis of the palmitoyl protein thioesterase 1 interactome in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. J Proteomics. 2015;123:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Piñero J, Bravo À, Queralt-Rosinach N, Gutiérrez-Sacristán A, Deu-Pons J, Centeno E, et al. DisGeNET: a comprehensive platform integrating information on human disease-associated genes and variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D833–39. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H, Kuhn M, Wyder S, Simonovic M, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein–protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D362–68. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nepusz T, Yu H, Paccanaro A. Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Methods. 2012;9:471. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1091–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bindea G, Galon J, Mlecnik B. CluePedia Cytoscape plugin: pathway insights using integrated experimental and in silico data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:661–3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ashtiani M, Mirzaie M, Jafari M. CINNA: An R package for deciphering Central Informative Nodes in Network Analysis. bioRxiv . 2017:168757. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ashtiani M, Salehzadeh-Yazdi A, Razaghi-Moghadam Z, Hennig H, Wolkenhauer O, Mirzaie M, et al. Selection of most relevant centrality measures: A systematic survey on protein-protein interaction networks. bioRxiv . 2017:149492. doi: 10.1186/s12918-018-0598-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hunter DJ. Gene–environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:287–98. doi: 10.1038/nrg1578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Du S, Maneix L, Zhang Q, Wan YW, Zheng H. The role of FOXO3 transcription factor in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Innov Aging. 2019;3:S842. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cao P, Maximov A, Südhof TC. Activity-dependent IGF-1 exocytosis is controlled by the Ca(2+)-sensor synaptotagmin-10. Cell. 2011;145:300–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li Z-g, Zhang W, Sima AA. Alzheimer-like changes in rat models of spontaneous diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:1817–24. doi: 10.2337/db07-0171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao X, Bausano B, Pike BR, Newcomb-Fernandez JK, Wang KK, Shohami E, et al. TNF‐α stimulates caspase‐3 activation and apoptotic cell death in primary septo‐hippocampal cultures. J Neurosci Res. 2001;64:121–31. doi: 10.1002/jnr.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holmes C, Cunningham C, Zotova E, Woolford J, Dean C, Kerr Su, et al. Systemic inflammation and disease progression in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2009;73:768–74. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b6bb95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zali MR, Rostami Nejad M, Rostami K, Alavian SM. Liver complications in celiac disease. Hepat Mon. 2011;11:333–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mejido DC, Andrade J, Vieira MN, Ferreira ST, De Felice FG. Insulin and leptin as potential cognitive enhancers in metabolic disorders and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropharmacology . 2020:108115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meek TH, Morton GJ. The role of leptin in diabetes: metabolic effects. Diabetologia. 2016;59:928–32. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3898-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jiang LQ, Duque-Guimaraes DE, Machado UF, Zierath JR, Krook A. Altered response of skeletal muscle to IL-6 in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2013;62:355–61. doi: 10.2337/db11-1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alizadeh AH, Ranjbar M, Ansari S, MirArab A, Alavian SM, Mohammad K, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B in Nahavand, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12:528–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sawada M, Imamura K, Nagatsu T. Role of cytokines in inflammatory process in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2006;70:373–81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-45295-0_57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mirza Z, A Kamal M, H Al-Qahtani M, Karim S. Establishing genomic/transcriptomic links between Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus by meta-analysis approach. CNS Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets. 2014;13:501–16. doi: 10.2174/18715273113126660154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tischer E, Mitchell R, Hartman T, Silva M, Gospodarowicz D, Fiddes J, et al. The human gene for vascular endothelial growth factor Multiple protein forms are encoded through alternative exon splicing. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:11947–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jafari F, Hamidian M, Rezadehbashi M, Doyle M, Salmanzadeh-Ahrabi S, Derakhshan F, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella species associated with acute diarrhea in Tehran, Iran. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2009;20:e56–62. doi: 10.1155/2009/341275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chiappelli M, Borroni B, Archetti S, Calabrese E, Corsi MM, Franceschi M, et al. VEGF gene and phenotype relation with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Rejuven Res. 2006;9:485–93. doi: 10.1089/rej.2006.9.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Karbalaei R, Allahyari M, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Asadzadeh-Aghdaei H, Zali MR. Protein-protein interaction analysis of Alzheimers disease and NAFLD based on systems biology methods unhide common ancestor pathways. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2018;11:27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ahmad A, Ali T, Kim MW, Khan A, Jo MH, Rehman SU, et al. Adiponectin homolog novel osmotin protects obesity/diabetes-induced NAFLD by upregulating AdipoRs/PPARα signaling in ob/ob and db/db transgenic mouse models. Metabolism. 2019;90:31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lee CH, Olson P, Hevener A, Mehl I, Chong LW, Olefsky JM, et al. PPARδ regulates glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am. 2006;103:3444–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511253103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huang W, Metlakunta A, Dedousis N, Zhang P, Sipula I, Dube JJ, et al. Depletion of liver Kupffer cells prevents the development of diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2010;59:347–57. doi: 10.2337/db09-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019;71:793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yaffe K, Falvey C, Hamilton N, Schwartz AV, Simonsick EM, Satterfield S, et al. Diabetes, glucose control, and 9-year cognitive decline among older adults without dementia. Arc Neurol. 2012;69:1170–5. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Geda YE, Cha RH, Pankratz VS, Baertlein L, et al. Association of diabetes with amnestic and nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer's Dementia. 2014;10:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ford W. Glycolysis and sperm motility: does a spoonful of sugar help the flagellum go round? Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:269–74. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miki K. Energy metabolism and sperm function. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:309–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Flesch FM, Gadella BM. Dynamics of the mammalian sperm plasma membrane in the process of fertilization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1469:197–235. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4157(00)00018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zali MR, Mohammad K, Noorbala AA, Noorimayer B, Shahraz S. Rate of hepatitis B seropositivity following mass vaccination in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2005;11:62–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Beeram E, Suman B, Divya B. Proteins as the Molecular Markers of Male Fertility. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019;12:19–23. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_9_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.López-Lemus UA, Garza-Guajardo R, Barboza-Quintana O, Rodríguez-Hernandez A, García-Rivera A, Madrigal-Pérez VM, et al. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and severe male reproductive organ impairment (germinal epithelial loss): Study on a mouse model and on human patients. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12:639–48. doi: 10.1177/1557988318763631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]