Summary
The SLC26A4 gene has been described as the second gene involved in most cases of autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL), after GJB2. Over 500 different SLC26A4 mutations have been reported, with each ethnic population having its own distinctive mutations. Here, we aimed to determine the frequency and mutation profile of the SLC26A4 gene from two different provinces (center and west) of Iran. This study included 50 nuclear families with two or more siblings segregating presumed ARNSHL. All affected tested negative for mutations in GJB2 at the DFNB1 locus and were therefore screened for autozygosity by descent using short tandem repeat polymorphisms (STRPs) of DFNB4. Sanger sequencing was performed to screen the 20 exons of the SLC26A4 gene for the families linked to this locus. In silico analyses were also performed using available software tools. Four out of 25 (16%) and 3 of 25 (12%) studied families of Isfahan and Hamedan provinces, respectively. were linked to DFNB4. Sanger sequencing led to the identification of six different mutations, one of which (c.919-2A>G) was recurrent and accounted for 31% of all mutant alleles. One out of 7 (14.3%) families with mutations were confirmed to be Pendred syndrome (PS). The SLC26A4 mutations have a high carrying rate in ARNSHL Iranian patients. The identification of a disease causing mutation can be used to establish a genotypic diagnosis and provide important information to the patients and their families.
Keywords: autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss, SLC26A4, Iran, Pendred syndrome
1. Introduction
Hearing loss (HL) is the most common sensory disorder affecting 2-3 out of 1,000 births (http://hearing.screening.NHs.UK/nationalprog); over 70-80% of the etiology are genetic factors. It is estimated that 70% of HL includes non-syndromic forms (NSHL), where the hearing deficit is the only sign. Approximately, 80% of cases in this group follow autosomal recessive inheritance (ARNSHL) (1). The autosomal recessive loci are called DFNB followed by a number corresponding to the order that the locus was first described; DFNB1 to DFNB108 have been reported so far (see Hereditary Hearing Loss Homepage at https://hereditaryhearingloss.org/).
Mutations in the SLC26A4 gene have been described for DFNB4 non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL, MIM # 600791) and Pendred syndrome (PS, MIM # 274600). Pendred syndrome is associated with sensorineural deafness, congenital and severe to profound temporal bone abnormalities, goiter and iodide organification defects. In the absence of thyroid dysfunction, patients are considered to be forms NSHL DFNB4 (2).
SLC26A4 (OMIM: 605646) was identified by Everett et al. after using positional cloning on chromosome 7q22-31. This gene encodes pendrin, an anion transporter, which is expressed in the kidneys, inner ear, and thyroid (3). Pendrin is composed of 780 amino acids and has a molecular weight of 86 k DA. In the inner ear, pendrin was found in the endolymphatic sac and hair cells, where it is involved in pH homeostasis, acting in bicarbonate/chloride exchange. Mutations in the SLC26A4 gene can affect pendrin activity, causing an imbalance of ions and fluid levels in the inner ear (4). Different investigations have suggested that SLC26A4 mutations are among the most frequent causes of genetic HL in the world populations, including Iranians (5). The genetic etiology of ARNSHL in Iran, has been shown by a number of independent studies with a special focus on DFNB1 (GJB2) (6-12), the most common cause of HL in the world (13-15). In the previous study, we showed that variants in the GJB2 (NM_004004.5) can explain the etiology of ARNSHL in 22.5% and 20% of patients from Isfahan and Hamedan provinces of Iran, suggesting that GJB2 gene mutations only represent a part of ARNSHL in the center and west of Iran (16). Thus, more studies are necessary to identify other common loci and determine the etiology of ARNSHL based on ethnicity (17,18).
In the present study we applied a homozygosity mapping strategy and Sanger sequencing to identify the spectrum and mutation type of the SLC26A4 gene contribution to ARNSHL. The study cohort included 50 ARNSHL families, negative for GJB2 mutations, from Isfahan and Hamedan provinces in the center and west of Iran for the first time. This study is part of a larger study, which aims to complete the genetic map of HL in Iran by investigating the pedigrees of families with hearing impaired members in each province. The result of this study should have implications in improved genetic counseling and prevention of HL using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Families and phenotype investigation
Fifty consanguineous multiplex families with at least 2 hearing impaired individuals in each family and negative for GJB2 mutations were recruited for this study. The Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences approved this project. All family members signed an informed written consent prior to recruitment. They met the following criteria: confirmation of HL by pure tone audiometry (PTA) from 250 to 8000 Hz, autosomal recessive inheritance through pedigree analysis (3), existence of three or more affected members within the pedigree. A complete clinical evaluation, including audiology, ophthalmological, and physical examinations were performed to exclude environmental exposures and to determine the presence of syndromic findings in each family.
In two families, both parents were hearing impaired, suggesting the presence of the same identical mutation by descent mutation.
2.2. Genotyping STR markers and linkage analysis
Genomic DNA of patients was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using a standard salting out procedure (19). Qualitative and quantitative assessment of genomic DNA was checked using 1.2% agarose gels and a Nanospec cube biophotometer (Nanolytik®, Dusseldorf, Germany).
Linkage analysis was performed using at least four informative Short Tandem Repeat (STR) markers located at or tightly linked to each locus. Primer sequences were obtained from the Probe database. Table 1 summarizes the general characteristics of the markers used in the study. Touchdown PCR was performed in a thermal cycler machine (ASTEC PC- 818, Fukuka, Japan) to amplify STR markers. PCR products from family members were genotyped using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. We used 12% polyacrylamide (29:1) to detect STR bands. As some STRs were uninformative in some of the families, we had to test more STRs to find at least 4 informative markers for each locus among families to confirm or reject linkage. Two-point and multi-point parametric LOD scores under a recessive model were, respectively, calculated by Superlink version 1.6 and Simwalk version 2.91 (assuming a risk allele frequency of 0.001 and complete penetrance) (easyLINKAGE program package) (20,21). Simwalk and Haplopainter software version 029.5 were used to reconstruct and visualize haplotypes, respectively (22).
Table 1. STR markers used and their characteristics.
Locus (gene) | STR | Heterozygosity (%) | Size (bp) | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNB4 (SLC26A4) | D7S2420 | 81 | 240-290 | CCTGTATGGAGGGCAAACTA | AAATAATGACTGAGGCTCAACA |
D7S2496 | 63 | 129-141 | AACAACAGTCAACCCACAAT | GCTATAACCTCATAACCAAAA | |
D7S2459 | 77 | 140-152 | AAGAAGTGCATTGAGACTCC | CCGCCTTAGTAAAACCC | |
D7S2456 | 78 | 238-252 | CTGGAAATTGACCTGAAACCTT | ACAGGGTCTCTCAATATTA |
STR, Short Tandem Repeat.
2.3. Mutation detection of SLC26A4
All 20 coding exons (numbered from 2 through 21) of the SLC26A4 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using previously reported primers (23). The PCR products were sequenced using a ABI3130 sequencer (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). The resulting sequences were edited and compared against the published NCBI Homo sapiens SLC26A4 DNA sequence reference assembly (accession NC_000007region: 107301080.107358254).
2.4. Computational analyses
We used Bioinformatics predictive tools including MutationTaster, PolyPhen and SIFT (24,25) to assess possible effects of mutations on the protein structure. Multiple sequence amino acid alignment of the pendrine protein and visualization of conserved amino acids was performed using the ConSurf Server. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines for variant interpretation were used to categorize identified variants (26).
2.5. Clinical investigation
Post-test genetic counselling and clinical examination were carried out for all affected members of the linked families, to determine whether the phenotype was related to DFNB4 (NSHL) or PDS (SHL).
Function, structure, and size of the thyroid were evaluated, to determine the presence of goiter, associated with PDS. The levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (27), T3 and T4 were measured in all patients by means of Elecsys (Chemiluminescent Immunoassay) to evaluate the function of the thyroid. The size and structure of the thyroid were assessed using a Tc99m thyroid scan. The Perchlorate Discharge Test (PDT) was done in order to confirm the clinical features of PDS. One gram of perchlorate (KClO4) was administered two hours after the administration of 131-iodine (50 mCi). Then, the discharge of iodide was measured. A discharge less than 10% of the incorporated iodide is expected in normal individuals (28). All three siblings (family IR-20) also underwent a high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the temporal bone, using a Somatom Sensation 16 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), to determine if there were alterations in the cochlea and vestibular aqueduct. When the diameter at the midpoint between the common crus and the external aperture was equal to or greater than 1.5 mm, it was described as Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA) (29).
3. Results
3.1. Family data and linkage analysis
After excluding mutations in GJB2, a total of 50 Iranian families segregating ARNSHL were recruited from Isfahan and Hamedan provinces (25 families from each province) in the center and west of Iran. Among the 50 families (456 individuals), there were 205 patients, with ages ranging from 6 months to 52 years. In 12 studied families, PTA was consistent with severe HL (61-80 dB) and the remaining had profound HL (≥ 80 dB).
The linkage results were confirmed by individually genotyping the family members for the same markers, as well as additional markers. After genotyping of STR markers, 7 out of the 50 families, negative for GJB2 mutations, showed linkage to DFNB4. 4 out of 25 (16%) and 3 of 25 (12%) ARNSHL families of Isfahan and Hamedan provinces, respectively, were linked to this locus. Two-point and multi-point LOD score values for the seven linked families are shown in Table 2. Our study included two deaf-to-deaf marriages, none of whom were linked to DFNB4.
Table 2. LOD score (two-point and multi-point) values for linked families to DFNB4.
Number | Family ID | Two-point LOD score | Multi-point LOD score | Severity HL |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | IR-9 | 3.1 | 3.2 | Severe-profound |
2 | IR-14 | 3.8 | 4.1 | Moderate-profound |
3 | IR-20 | 2.8 | 3.2 | Severe |
4 | ISF-5 | 3 | 3.3 | Severe-profound |
5 | ISF-6 | 3.5 | 3.9 | Profound |
6 | ISF-15 | 29 | 3.3 | Profound |
7 | ISF-21 | 3.2 | 3.6 | Severe-profound |
3.2. SLC26A4 mutation screening
A total of 6 different SLC26A4 mutations including c.416G>T, c.1334T>G, c.1156A>G, c.1238A>G, c.1295C>T and c.919-2 A>G were detected in 13 out of the 100 (13%) total studied alleles (Table 3). In one of the DFNB4 linked families, only one heterozygous mutation was identified, and the remaining five families were homozygotes. Notably, the result of the present study might be a digenic state: interaction with one of the two genes interacting with SLC26A4. The missing cause is most likely a non-coding mutation or a large deletion in the coding region. It is certainly possible that a homozygous mutation in another gene could be the underlying cause of HL in this family.
Table 3. Identified SLC26A4 mutations, their frequencies and in silico analyses.
Mutations | No (%) |
Mutation type | Location | Functional effect |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isfahan | Hamedan | PolyPhen Prediction | CADD score | SIFT | |||
c.416 G>T | 0 | 2 (4) | Missense | Exon 05 | probably damaging | 24.8 | Damaging |
c.1156 A>G | 1 | 0 | Missense | Exon 10 | probably damaging | 22 | Damaging |
c.1238 A>G | 2 (4) | 0 | Missense | Exon 10 | probably damaging | 26.2 | Damaging |
c.1259 C>T | 2 (4) | 0 | Missense | Exon 10 | probably damaging | 23.8 | Damaging |
c.1334 C>T | 0 | 2 (4) | Missense | Exon 11 | probably damaging | 24.1 | Tolerated |
c.919-2 A>G | 2 (4) | 2 (4) | Splice-site | Exon 07 | NA | 27 | NA |
Normal | 43 | 44 | |||||
Total | 50 | 50 |
One mutation was a splice site and the others were missense (Table 3). One mutation (c.919-2A>G), was seen in two linked families (IR-9 and ISF-5) from both Isfahan and Hamedan province (Figure 1). All the mutations showed co-segregation with HL in the related family members. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the identified mutations in the schematic structure of pendrin. In silico program prediction is shown in Table 3. The ConSurf Server (http://conseq.tau.ac.il/) revealed that the causative variants were located at a well conserved site (Figure 3).
Figure 1.
(A) Pedigree and segregation of the c.919-2A>G mutation in Iranian family ISF-5; (B) Right and left ear audiograms in the (V: 1) patients from ISF-5 family; (C) Sequencing results of the c.919-2A>G mutation.
Figure 2.
Location of SLC26A4 mutations at the protein level (The mutation 919-2A>G as an intronic mutation does not change amino acid at the protein level).
Figure 3.
Multiple amino acid alignment of protein homologs was conserved. The identified mutations c.416G>T, c.1334T>G, c.1156A>G, c.1238A>G and c.1295C>T occur at highly conserved positions (Gly 139, Ile 386, Gln 413, Thr 420 and Leu 445) in the pendrin protein.
3.3. Clinical testing results
CT scan showed EVA in all linked families (Figure 4). The levels of thyroid hormones (TSH, T3, and T4) were normal in all linked families, but thyroid scan detected enlarged multinodular goiter in one family (IR-20). There were multiple cold and functioning isoactive nodes on both lobes, which is strong evidence supporting that c.1334 C>T is associated with PDS.
Figure 4.
Temporal bone CT scan results of an affected member with EVA.
4. Discussion
Mutations of SLC26A4 are a well-known cause of ARNSHL globally. Many studies have been performed to demonstrate the role of SLC26A4 mutations in ARNSHL among various ethnic cohorts (30-32). In a recent multicenter study performed by Sloan- Heggen et al., 37 out of 302 GJB2-negative multiplex Iranian families (12.3%) were attributable to variants in the SLC26A4 gene (33), while the frequency of the SLC26A4 mutations has been reported in Pakistan (34) and Turkey to be 5.4%, and 1.8% (35) respectively. Mutations of SLC26A4 are the second most common cause of HL, and have been identified in the sequence encoding all of the transmembrane (TM1-12) segments of this protein (36).
The most comprehensive previous study was done on 80 GJB2-negative Iranian subjects using linkage analysis and Sanger sequencing showing ~10% ARNSHL families are related to the SLC26A4 gene and ranked second after DFNB1 (37). Our study shows that 4 out of 25 (16%) and 3 of 25 (12%) ARNSHL families of Isfahan and Hamedan provinces, respectively, were linked to DFNB4. The spectrum of SLC26A4 mutations in our cohort of 50 Iranian families involves mostly missense mutations (70%), which was observed in the other Iranian cohort studies (Table 4) as well as other populations (38,39).
Table 4. Characterization of Iranian families with SLC26A4 mutations.
Nucleotide Change | Amino Acid Change | Location | Mutation Type | Authors (Year) |
---|---|---|---|---|
c.65-66insT | p.Ser23ValfsAla64 | Exon 02 | Frameshift | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.269C>T | p.Ser90Leu | Exon 03 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.235C>T | p.Arg79* | Exon 03 | Nonsense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.347G>T | p.Gly116Val | Exon 04 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.416G>T | p.Gly139Val | Exon 05 | Missense | Reisi et al. (2014) |
c.481T>A | p.Phe161Ile | Exon 05 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.683C>A | p.Ala228Asp | Exon 06 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.716T>A | p.Val239Asp | Exon 06 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.863-864insT | p.Leu288PhefsGly3 | Exon 07 | Frameshift | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.881-882delAC | p.His294GlnfsGlu35 | Exon 07 | Frameshift | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.919-2A>G | - | Intron 07 | Splice site | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.965insA | p.Asn322KfsAla8 | Exon 08 | Frameshift | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.959-960insA | p.Gly320LeufsLys20 | Exon 08 | Frameshift | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1001G>T | p.Gly334Val | Exon 08 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1102G>A | p.Gly368Arg | Exon 09 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1156 A>G | p.Ile386Val | Exon 10 | Missense | Present study |
c.1174A>T | p.Asn392Tyr | Exon 10 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1197delT | p.Cys400Valfsx32 | Exon 10 | Missense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.1226G>A | p.Arg409His | Exon 10 | Missense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.1229C>T | p.Thr410Met | Exon 10 | Missense | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.1238A>G | p.Gln413Arg | Exon 10 | Missense | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.1259C>T | p.Thr420Ile | Exon 10 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1334T>G | p.Leu445Trp | Exon 11 | Missense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.1412delT | p.Leu471Argfsx17 | Exon 12 | Missense | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.1343C>T | p.Ser448Leu | Exon 12 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1489G>A | p.Gly497Cys | Exon 13 | Missense | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.1517T>G | p.Leu506Arg | Exon 13 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1546C>T | p.Pro516Ser | Exon 13 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1574C>T | p.Pro525Leu | Exon 13 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1614+1G>C | - | Intron 14 | Splice site | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1717G>T | p.Asp573Tyr | Exon 16 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.1790T>C | p.Leu597Ser | Exon 16 | Missense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.2027T>A | p.Leu676Gln | Exon 19 | Missense | Sloan-Heggen et al. (2015) |
c.2106delG | p.Lys702Asnfsx19 | Exon 19 | Missense | Yazdanpanahi et al. (2015) |
c.2162C>T | p.Thr721Met | Exon 19 | Missense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.2145G>T | p.Lys715Asn | Exon 20 | Missense | Kahrizi et al. (2009) |
c.1156A>G is reported for the first time in Iran. This variant is the adenine to guanine transversion in exon 10 at codon 386 resulting in substitution of isoleucine by valine (P. Ile 386Val). The isoleucine 386 residue is highly conserved among species. Moreover, substitution of residues with a residue, which has different physicochemical properties might result in damaging effects. Isolucine is a nonpolar amino acid with a big hydrophobic structure, while Valine is a small non-charged amino acid. This substitution would affect its contacts with neighboring residues, thereby influencing the folding of the pendrin protein with the mutated residue (36).
Three out of 6 (50%) mutations (c.416 G>T, c.919- 2A>G and c.1238A>G) were reported in our previous study for the first time in Iran (23,40). They may be unique to the Iranian population, which should be further investigated. Here, exon 10 had the most number of mutations (38.5%). c.1156 A>G, c.1238 A>C and c.1259 C>T mutations are located in exon 10 within the 10th loop putative transmembrane segment of the pendrin protein. Previous studies showed that near 16% of SLC26A4 mutations are observed within exon 10 (39), suggesting that the TM10 region is functionally relevant for pendrin activity (36).
In the current study, one out of the 7 (14.3%) families with SLC26A4 mutations had PS syndrome. In the previous studies in Iran, half of the families with SLC26A4 mutations were diagnosed with PS (23). These results suggest that PS is probably a prevalent syndromic form of HL, which has to be considered in molecular diagnostics of HL in Iran. EVA was a constant feature among all the tested patients in this study.
Unlike GJB2, the SLC26A4 gene has a larger role in Asian than Caucasian populations (34,41,42). Studies on NSHL have revealed biallelic SLC26A4 mutations in 2% to 3.5% of Caucasian patients (39,43,44), but in 5.5% to 12.6% of East Asian patients (42,45,46). P.Val239Asp was the most common mutation in Turkey (33.3%) and Pakistan (35.6%) while c.919- 2A>G and c.1334C>T mutations are more prevalent in East Asia (34,47); c.919-2>G has also been found in two of the families in our study. In our patient group, the most frequent mutation is c.919-2A>G, detected in 31% of the mutated alleles. This mutation, which has previously been reported in other ethnic groups, was shown to be a founder mutation in Chinese (48) and was reported with a frequency of 31% in a Korean cohort (49). However, apart from the present study, no other studies have reported such a high frequency of the c.919-2A>G mutation in Iran (37). Notably, c.1238A>G, detected in our previous study, was more common in our population (23). The spectrum of mutations in SLC26A4 in our patients from Isfahan and Hamedan provinces might not be broad, with mutations affecting 3 of 20 exons and exon/intron boundaries. This finding will help design simplified routine DNA testing, targeting the most frequent mutation(s) rather than sequencing all 20 coding exons in patients. Interestingly, the analysis could be started with exon 10, where we found the majority of pathogenic mutations.
The limitation of this study was the sampling of all members of a family. Because both healthy and deaf people had to be sampled, and some members lived in different cities.
5. Conclusion
In the current study, we performed homozygosity mapping analyses and detected 16% and 12% of the studied families to be associated with the SLC26A4 gene in Isfahan and Hamedan provinces. Our finding will extend the mutation spectrum of the SLC26A4 gene, and could be applied to prepare a targeted approach to cover the mutations of the SLC26A4 gene for molecular diagnostics in central and west Iran.
Acknowledgements
This is a partial result of the PhD dissertation of M.K. We would like to thank our patients and their families for participating in this study.
Funding:
The Isfahan University of Medical Sciences supported this work (Grant no. 394531, 194068).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
References
- 1. Morton NE. Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991; 630:16-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Li XC, Everett LA, Lalwani AK, Desmukh D, Friedman TB, Green ED, Wilcox ER. A mutation in PDS causes non-syndromic recessive deafness. Nat Genet. 199818:215-217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Everett LA, Glaser B, Beck JC, Idol JR, Buchs A, Heyman M, Adawi F, Hazani E, Nassir E, Baxevanis AD, Sheffield VC, Green ED. Pendred syndrome is caused by mutations in a putative sulphate transporter gene (PDS). Nat Genet. 1997; 17:411-422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Albert S, Blons H, Jonard L, et al. SLC26A4 gene is frequently involved in nonsyndromic hearing impairment with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in Caucasian populations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006; 14:773-779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Koohiyan M. A systematic review of SLC26A4 mutations causing hearing loss in the Iranian population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. 125:1-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Azadegan-Dehkordi F, Bahrami T, Shirzad M, Karbasi G, Yazdanpanahi N, Farrokhi E, Koohiyan M, Tabatabaiefar MA, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M. Mutations in GJB2 as major causes of autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss: first report of c.299-300delAT mutation in Kurdish population of Iran. J Audiol Otol. 2019; 23:20-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Najmabadi H, Nishimura C, Kahrizi K, Riazalhosseini Y, Malekpour M, Daneshi A, Farhadi M, Mohseni M, Mahdieh N, Ebrahimi A, Bazazzadegan N, Naghavi A, Avenarius M, Arzhangi S, Smith RJ. GJB2 mutations: passage through Iran. Am J Med Genet A. 2005; 133A:132-137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Koohiyan M, Ahmadi A, Koohian F, Aghaei S, Amiri B, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M. An update of spectrum and frequency of GJB2 mutations causing hearing loss in the south of Iran: a literature review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 119:136-140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zarepour N, Koohiyan M, Taghipour-Sheshdeh A, Nemati-Zargaran F, Saki N, Mohammadi-Asl J, Tabatabaiefar MA, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M. Identification and clinical implications of a novel MYO15A variant in a consanguineous Iranian family by targeted exome sequencing. Audiol Neurootol. 2019; 24:25-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Koohiyan M. Next generation sequencing and genetics of hereditary hearing loss in the Iranian population: New insights from a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 129:109756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Koohiyan M. Identification and clinical implications of a novel pathogenic variant in the GJB2 gene causes autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss in a consanguineous Iranian family. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2020; 9:30-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Koohiyan M, Reiisi S, Azadegan-Dehkordi F, Salehi M, Abtahi H, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M, Noori-Daloii MR, Tabatabaiefar MA. Screening of 10 DFNB loci causing autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss in two Iranian populations negative for GJB2 mutations. Iran J Public Health. 2019; 48:1704-1713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lucotte G, Mercier G. Meta-analysis of GJB2 mutation 35delG frequencies in Europe. Genet Test. 2001; 5:149-152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Azadegan-Dehkordi F, Ahmadi R, Koohiyan M, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M. Update of spectrum c.35delG and c.-23+1G>A mutations on the GJB2 gene in individuals with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. Ann Hum Genet. 2019; 83:1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Koohiyan M. Genetics of hereditary hearing loss in the Middle East: a systematic review of the carrier frequency of the GJB2 Mutation (35delG). Audiology and Neurotology. 2019; 24:161-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Koohiyan M, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M, Salehi M, Abtahi H, Reiisi S, Pourreza MR, Noori-Daloii MR, Tabatabaiefar MA. GJB2 mutations causing autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL) in two Iranian populations: Report of two novel variants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 107:121-126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Koohiyan M, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M, Salehi M, Abtahi H, Noori-Daloii MR, Tabatabaiefar MA. A novel cadherin 23 variant for hereditary hearing loss reveals additional support for a DFNB12 nonsyndromic phenotype of CDH23. Audiol Neurootol. 2020; 25:258-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Koohiyan M, Noori-Daloii MR, Hashemzadeh- Chaleshtori M, Salehi M, Abtahi H, Tabatabaiefar MA. A novel pathogenic variant in the CABP2 gene causes severe nonsyndromic hearing loss in a consanguineous Iranian family. Audiol Neurootol. 2019; 24:258-263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16:1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lindner TH, Hoffmann K. easyLINKAGE: a PERL script for easy and automated two-/multi-point linkage analyses. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21:405-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Fishelson M, Geiger D. Optimizing exact genetic linkage computations. J Comput Biol. 2004; 11:263-275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Thiele H, Nürnberg P. HaploPainter: a tool for drawing pedigrees with complex haplotypes. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21:1730-1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yazdanpanahi N, Tabatabaiefar MA, Bagheri N, Azadegan Dehkordi F, Farrokhi E, Hashemzadeh Chaleshtori M. The role and spectrum of SLC26A4 mutations in Iranian patients with autosomal recessive hereditary deafness. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54:124-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:575-576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010; 7:248-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier- Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17:405-424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Frei K, Ramsebner R, Lucas T, Hamader G, Szuhai K, Weipoltshammer K, Baumgartner WD, Wachtler FJ, Kirschhofer K. GJB2 mutations in hearing impairment: identification of a broad clinical spectrum for improved genetic counseling. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115:461-465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wolff J. Perchlorate and the thyroid gland. Pharmacol Rev. 1998; 50:89-105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Berrettini S, Forli F, Bogazzi F, Neri E, Salvatori L, Casani AP, Franceschini SS. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: audiological, radiological, clinical, and genetic features. Am J Otolaryngol. 2005; 26:363-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. de Moraes VC, dos Santos NZ, Ramos PZ, Svidnicki MC, Castilho AM, Sartorato EL. Molecular analysis of SLC26A4 gene in patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss and EVA: identification of two novel mutations in Brazilian patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77:410-413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Azadegan-Dehkordi F, Koohiyan M, Shirzad M, Bahrami T, Yazdanpanahi N, Tabatabaiefar MA, Pourpaknia R, Farrokhi E, Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori M. Mutation analysis of GJB2 and GJB6 genes and screening of nine common dfnb loci in Iranian pedigrees with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. Indian Journal of Otology. 2019; 25:97-102. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tsukada K, Nishio SY, Hattori M, Usami S. Ethnic-specific spectrum of GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutations: their origin and a literature review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124 Suppl 1:61S-76S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sloan-Heggen CM, Babanejad M, Beheshtian M, et al. Characterising the spectrum of autosomal recessive hereditary hearing loss in Iran. J Med Genet. 2015; 52:823-829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Park HJ, Shaukat S, Liu XZ, et al. Origins and frequencies of SLC26A4 (PDS) mutations in east and south Asians: global implications for the epidemiology of deafness. J Med Genet. 2003; 40:242-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Tekin M, Akçayöz D, Comak E, Boğoçlu G, Duman T, Fitoz S, Ilhan I, Akar N. Screening the SLC26A4 gene in probands with deafness and goiter (Pendred syndrome) ascertained from a large group of students of the schools for the deaf in Turkey. Clin Genet. 2003; 64:371-374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bassot C, Minervini G, Leonardi E, Tosatto SC. Mapping pathogenic mutations suggests an innovative structural model for the pendrin (SLC26A4) transmembrane domain. Biochimie. 2017; 132:109-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kahrizi K, Mohseni M, Nishimura C, Bazazzadegan N, Fischer SM, Dehghani A, Sayfati M, Taghdiri M, Jamali P, Smith RJ, Azizi F, Najmabadi H. Identification of SLC26A4 gene mutations in Iranian families with hereditary hearing impairment. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168:651-653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jiang H, Chen J, Shan XJ, Li Y, He JG, Yang BB. Prevalence and range of GJB2 and SLC26A4 mutations in patients with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. Mol Med Rep. 2014; 10:379-386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Rendtorff ND, Schrijver I, Lodahl M, Rodriguez- Paris J, Johnsen T, Hansén EC, Nickelsen LA, Tümer Z, Fagerheim T, Wetke R, Tranebjaerg L. SLC26A4 mutation frequency and spectrum in 109 Danish Pendred syndrome/DFNB4 probands and a report of nine novel mutations. Clin Genet. 2013; 84:388-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Reiisi S, Sanati MH, Tabatabaiefar MA, Ahmadian S, Reiisi S, Parchami S, Porjafari H, Shahi H, Shavarzi A, Hashemzade Chaleshtori M. The study of SLC26A4 gene causing autosomal recessive hearing loss by linkage analysis in a cohort of Iranian populations. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2014; 3:176-182. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dai P, Stewart AK, Chebib F, et al. Distinct and novel SLC26A4/Pendrin mutations in Chinese and U.S. patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Physiol Genomics. 2009; 38:281-290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Usami S; Deafness Gene Study Consortium. Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation of hearing loss patients caused by SLC26A4 mutations in the Japanese: a large cohort study. J Hum Genet. 2014; 59:262-268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dahl HH, Ching TY, Hutchison W, Hou S, Seeto M, Sjahalam-King J. Etiology and audiological outcomes at 3 years for 364 children in Australia. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e59624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hutchin T, Coy NN, Conlon H, Telford E, Bromelow K, Blaydon D, Taylor G, Coghill E, Brown S, Trembath R, Liu XZ, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Mueller R. Assessment of the genetic causes of recessive childhood non-syndromic deafness in the UK - implications for genetic testing. Clin Genet. 2005; 68:506-512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yuan Y, Guo W, Tang J, Zhang G, Wang G, Han M, Zhang X, Yang S, He DZ, Dai P. Molecular epidemiology and functional assessment of novel allelic variants of SLC26A4 in non-syndromic hearing loss patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct in China. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e49984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Guo YF, Liu XW, Guan J, Han MK, Wang DY, Zhao YL, Rao SQ, Wang QJ. GJB2, SLC26A4 and mitochondrial DNA A1555G mutations in prelingual deafness in Northern Chinese subjects. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008; 128:297-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lee KY, Choi SY, Bae JW, Kim S, Chung KW, Drayna D, Kim UK, Lee SH. Molecular analysis of the GJB2, GJB6 and SLC26A4 genes in Korean deafness patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 72:1301-1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Dai P, Li Q, Huang D, et al. SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G varies among Chinese ethnic groups as a cause of hearing loss. Genet Med. 2008; 10:586-592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Park HJ, Lee SJ, Jin HS, Lee JO, Go SH, Jang HS, Moon SK, Lee SC, Chun YM, Lee HK, Choi JY, Jung SC, Griffith AJ, Koo SK. Genetic basis of hearing loss associated with enlarged vestibular aqueducts in Koreans. Clin Genet. 2005; 67:160-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]