Abstract
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are considered potential biomarkers in the pathogenesis and detection of several types of cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the role of hsa_circ_0000129 in the pathogenesis and molecular mechanism underlying breast cancer. A total of 68 pairs of breast cancer and corresponding paracancerous tissue samples, three different breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) and a normal human breast cell line (MCF-10A) were used to investigate the expression of hsa_circ_0000129. The effect of hsa_circ_0000129 on cell proliferation, migration and colony formation was assessed in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells, along with the expression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2). The results demonstrated that hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly higher in breast cancer tissues compared with normal tissues. In addition, high hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and a higher tumor-node-metastasis stage. Comparisons between the breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) and MCF-10A cells indicated similar results. MCF-7 cells overexpressed with hsa_circ_0000129 significantly increased cell proliferation, migration and colony formation compared with the negative control group, the effects of which were reversed following hsa_circ_0000129 knockdown in MDA-MB-468 cells. Furthermore, EZH2 expression was positively associated with hsa_circ_0000129 expression. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that hsa_circ_0000129 may represent a promising prognostic biomarker for breast cancer. In addition, the role of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer cell lines indicates a mechanism for tumorigenesis, as well as a potent target for the treatment of malignant progression.
Keywords: hsa_circ_0000129, breast cancer, EZH2, circular RNAs
Introduction
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women worldwide, whereby ~1 in every 8 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime (1,2). Currently, treatment options for breast cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone treatment (3). Advancements in the early detection and effective management of breast cancer have resulted in a worldwide decrease in mortalities (3), particularly in western countries, including North America and Europe (1–4). However, breast cancer-associated mortalities continue to increase in developing countries and in patients suffering from different treatment-resistant subtypes of breast cancer (5). In addition, early diagnosis is one of the important factors influencing the long-term survival rate in most types of cancer (3); however, the pathogenesis of breast cancer is complex and heterogenous (6). Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathological tools are commonly used for the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer; however, early diagnosis remains relatively uncommon (7). Thus, identifying novel biomarkers and targets for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer remains urgent.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a group of non-coding RNAs, which were first discovered in 1976 in RNA viruses via electron microscopy (8). Their unique closed circular structures (lacking 5′-3′ untranslated regions and a poly A tail) meant they were initially regarded as functionless by-products of errors in splicing (9). However, several studies have demonstrated that circRNAs influence a number of biological functions, such as microRNA (miRNA) sponging, regulation of transcription, immune regulation and serving as templates for protein translation (8,10,11), which may explain their effects on different types of diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, neurological dystrophy and breast, liver, colorectal and lung cancers (12–16).
In breast cancer, extensive dysregulation of several CircRNAs, such as hsa_circ_0104824, CircPVT1 and circRNA 0001073 (17–19), has been reported, and their potential diagnostic and therapeutic values have been demonstrated. For example, 1,705 differentially expressed circRNAs have been identified in breast cancer tissues, and hsa_circ_0001982 has been confirmed to be significantly upregulated in both breast cancer tissues and cell lines (20). In addition, hsa_circ_0001982 knockdown suppresses breast cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness, and induces apoptosis by targeting miR-143, which provides a novel insight into the molecular mechanism underlying breast cancer tumorigenesis (20). Notably, Yin et al (21) identified 41 aberrantly expressed circRNAs in plasma specimens between five breast cancer samples and tissues from paired healthy volunteers; however, only three circRNAs were validated to be significantly dysregulated, and hsa_circ_0001785 exhibited a better diagnostic value compared with the other two candidates (hsa_circ_0108942 and hsa_circ_0068033), and carcinoembryonic antigen (21). Furthermore, hsa_circ_0001785 plasma level was significantly associated with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, grading of the breast tumor and extent of distant metastasis (21). Thus, the potential role of other circRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as therapeutic targets in breast cancer, warrants further research.
In the present study, the novel circRNA hsa_circ_0000129, located at 151145974-151149507 in chromosome 1, was selected using a Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE111504) microarray dataset (GSE111504) (22). The present study investigated the expression level of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer patients and breast cancer cell lines, and the results demonstrated that its levels were significantly enhanced in breast cancer tissues and cells compared with their corresponding controls. The effects of hsa_circ_0000129 on the proliferation, migration and colony formation abilities of breast cancer cells and the expression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) were also studied, aiming to reveal the role of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer progression.
Materials and methods
Collection of specimens
Breast cancer tissues and adjacent paracancerous tissues (collected ≥5 cm from the tumor border) were collected from 68 patients with breast cancer at the Jing'an District Centre Hospital of Shanghai (Shangai, China) between February 2016 and May 2018. The fresh biopsy tissues were preserved in RNA fixer reagent (Bioteke Corporation) and stored at −80°C prior to subsequent experimentation. Clinical and demographic data were collected from all patients, and no patients had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgical resection. Tumor size was determined using CT scan images and both MRI and CT scans were used to diagnose the extent of lymph node metastasis. Tumor staging and grading were assessed according to the cancer staging manual of American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th edition) (23). The present study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital (Shanghai, China; approval no. 2016MS02), and written informed consent was provided by all patients prior to the study start.
Cell culture
The breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) and normal epithelial breast cell line (MCF10A) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. All cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (all purchased from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Cells successfully transfected with the overexpression vector or interference sequence of hsa_circ_0000129 were cultured in complete DMEM at 37°C.
Transient transfection
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 4.0×105 cells/well. After 24 h, MCF-7 cells were transfected with the overexpression vector for hsa_circ_0000129 (Geneseed Biotech, Inc.) using Lipofectamine® 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol, while a control vector (Geneseed Biotech, Inc.) was used as the negative control (NC). MDA-MB-468 cells were transfected with an interference sequence for hsa_circ_0000129 or NC sequence (Geneseed Biotech, Inc., http://www.geneseed.com.cn), using Lipofectamine® 2000 reagent. All cells were transfected for 24 h at 37°C and another 48 h later, transfection efficiency was determined via reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR analysis.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from breast cancer tissues and adjacent paracancerous tissues using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into double-strand cDNA using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit (cat. no. FSQ-101; Toyobo Life Science), according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR was subsequently performed using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (cat. no. RR820A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), 0.5 µl cDNA, 0.5 µl each primer and 5 µl SYBR Green. The following primer sequences were designed by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., and used for qPCR: GAPDH forward, 5′-GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG-3′; hsa_circ_0000129 forward, 5′-AAGAGGGAAATCCCAGCAGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCATGAGGAGTCAATGCAGA-3′; and EZH2 forward, 5′-AATCAGAGTACATGCGACTGAGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCTGTATCCTTCGCTGTTTCC-3′. The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPCR: 94°C for 5 min, 42 cycles of 94°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 1 min. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (24) and normalized to the internal reference gene GAPDH.
Cell proliferation assay
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells transfected with NC or hsa_circ_0000129 sequences were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3.5×103 cells/well and incubated at 37°C for 1–7 days. Subsequently, cells were incubated with 5 mg/ml MTT reagent (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 3 h at 37°C. Following the MTT incubation, the supernatant was removed and the purple formazan crystals were dissolved using dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Cell proliferation was subsequently analyzed at a wavelength of 492 nm, between 0–7 days. Cell proliferation was assessed using the following formula: Proliferation rate = A (sample)/A (control), where A is the absorbance measured at 492 nm and control is the sample which was analyzed on day 0.
Colony formation assay
MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells transfected with NC or hsa_circ_0000129 sequences were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 6.0×102 cells/well and incubated for 14 days at 37°C. The cell media were replaced every 48 h. The plates were subsequently washed three times with PBS and the cell colonies were fixed with 100% methanol at room temperature for 15 min, prior to staining with 1% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. Stained colonies (with >50 cells) were observed under a light microscope (magnification, ×200).
Migration assay
The migratory ability MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells transfected with NC or hsa_circ_0000129 sequences was assessed using 24-well Transwell inserts (8-µm pore size; EMD Millipore), according to the manufacturer's protocol. A total of 1.0×104 cells were plated in the upper chambers of Transwell plates in 100 µl serum-free DMEM. DMEM (600 µl) supplemented with 10% FBS was plated in the lower chambers. Following incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the non-migratory cells in the upper chambers were removed using cotton swabs, while the migratory cells in the lower chambers were fixed with 100% methanol at room temperature for 15 min and stained with 1% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. Stained cells were counted in five randomly selected fields using a light microscope (magnification, ×200).
Western blotting
Cell lysates were extracted from MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells transfected with NC or hsa_circ_0000129 sequences using cell lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), and centrifuged at 13,800 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Total protein was quantified using the BCA protein assay kit (cat. no. 70-PQ0011; Hangzhou MultiSciences Biotech Co., Ltd., http://www.liankebio.com), according to the manufacturer's protocol, and 20 µg protein/lane was separated via SDS-PAGE on a 12% gel. The separated proteins were subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes and blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were incubated with primary monoclonal antibodies against EZH2 (cat. no. 5246; 1:1,000) and β-actin (cat. no. 3700, 1:1,000) overnight at 4°C. Following the primary incubation, membranes were incubated with HRP-linked secondary antibody (cat. no. 7076, 1:1,000), at room temperature for 1 h and subsequently visualized using the Ultra-sensitive ECL chemiluminescence kit (cat. no. P0018AS; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All experiments were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Paired and unpaired Student's t-tests were used to compare differences between two groups, while ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used to compare differences between multiple groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
hsa_circ_0000129 expression is upregulated in breast cancer
RT-qPCR analysis was performed to detect hsa_circ_0000129 expression in breast cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues. The results demonstrated that hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly higher in tumor tissues compared with normal tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1A). Similarly, hsa_circ_0000129 expression was compared between the breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) and normal MCF10A cells. The results demonstrated that hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly higher in all three cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) compared with MCF10A cells (P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively; Fig. 1B).
Association between hsa_circ_0000129 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with breast cancer
As presented in Table I, significant associations were observed between hsa_circ_0000129 expression and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05) and TNM stage (P<0.01). However, no significant associations were observed between hsa_circ_0000129 expression and age, menopause status and tumor size.
Table I.
Characteristic | Number of cases, n | hsa_circ_0000129 expression, mean ± standard deviation | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 0.499 | ||
≤50 | 36 | 2.15±1.47 | |
>50 | 32 | 1.87±1.93 | |
Menopause | 0.348 | ||
No | 40 | 1.97±1.45 | |
Yes | 28 | 2.37±2.07 | |
Tumor size, cm | 0.847 | ||
≤2 | 30 | 1.98±1.41 | |
>2 | 38 | 2.06±1.91 | |
Lymph node metastasis | 0.036a | ||
No | 33 | 1.58±1.36 | |
Yes | 35 | 2.44±1.89 | |
TNM stage | 0.002b | ||
I–II | 37 | 1.47±1.33 | |
III–IV | 31 | 2.68±1.87 |
P<0.05
P<0.01. TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
hsa_circ_0000129 regulates the proliferation of breast cancer cells
RT-qPCR analysis demonstrated the successful overexpression of hsa_circ_0000129 in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2A). MCF-7 cells transfected with hsa_circ_0000129 sequence exhibited significantly increased cell proliferation compared with cells in the NC group (P<0.001 at days 4, 5, 6 and 7; Fig. 2B). RT-qPCR analysis also demonstrated the successful knockdown of hsa_circ_0000129 in MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig. 2C). The results of the MTT assay demonstrated that hsa_circ_0000129 knockdown significantly decreased the proliferation rate of MDA-MB-468 cells compared with cells in the si-NC group (P<0.001 at days 4, 5, 6 and 7 post-incubation; Fig. 2D).
hsa_circ_0000129 regulates the migration of breast cancer cells
The results demonstrated that the migratory ability was significantly enhanced in MCF-7 cells transfected with hsa_circ_0000129 vector compared with the NC group (P<0.001; Fig. 3A). Conversely, the migratory ability was significantly attenuated in MDA-MB-468 cells transfected with si-hsa_circ_0000129 compared with the si-NC group (P<0.01; Fig. 3B).
hsa_circ_0000129 regulates colony formation in breast cancer cells
The effect of hsa_circ_0000129 on colony formation ability was assessed. The results demonstrated that the colony formation ability of MCF-7 cells was significantly enhanced following overexpression of hsa-circ-0000129 (P<0.001; Fig. 4A). Conversely, hsa_circ_0000129 knockdown significantly inhibited the colony formation ability of MDA-MB-468 cells compared with the si-NC group (P<0.01; Fig. 4B).
Effect of hsa_circ_0000129 on EZH2 expression
EZH2 expression was detected to determine its underlying molecular mechanism in relation to hsa_circ_0000129. RT-qPCR and western blot analyses demonstrated that EZH2 expression was significantly higher in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 cells compared with MCF-10A cells (P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively; Fig. 5A and B). RT-qPCR and western blot analyses also demonstrated that EZH2 expression was significantly higher in MCF-7 cells overexpressing hsa_circ_0000129 compared with cells in the NC group (P<0.01; Fig. 5C and D). Conversely, RT-qPCR and western blot analyses demonstrated that EZH2 expression was significantly downregulated in MDA-MB-468 cells following hsa_circ_0000129 knockdown compared with cells in the si-NC group according (P<0.001; Fig. 5E and F).
Discussion
The present study aimed to investigate the role and determine the underlying molecular mechanism of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer. The results demonstrated that hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly higher in breast cancer tissues compared with adjacent paracancerous tissues, and hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and high TNM staging, which suggests that high hsa_circ_0000129 expression may predict a higher malignancy index in patients with breast cancer.
Similarly, the results of the present study demonstrated that hsa_circ_0000129 expression was significantly higher in all three breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) compared with the normal epithelial breast cancer cell line, MCF10A. Notably, hsa_circ_0000129 expression was higher in MDA-MB-468 cells compared with MDA-MB-231 cells, and exhibited the lowest expression in MCF-7 cells. The differences in expression between the three breast cancer cell lines may be attributed to the differences in cellular characteristics. First, although all three cell lines originate from the metastatic pleural effusions of patients with breast cancer, the malignancy degrees may vary (25). Secondly, the results of the present study demonstrated that high hsa_circ_0000129 expression in the clinical samples was associated with a higher degree of malignancy, which may also be applicable to these cell lines. Furthermore, certain studies investigating these cell lines have reported that the phenotypes of the cells are notably different, whereby the migratory and invasive abilities, and stemness of MDA-MB-231 cells are higher compared with MCF-7 cells (25–27). In addition, the migratory, invasive and colony formation abilities of MDA-MB-468 cells have been demonstrated to be significantly higher compared with MDA-MB-231 cells (28), which are consistent with the results of the present study and suggest that MDA-MB-468 cells are more malignant than MCF-7 cells.
The role of hsa_circ_0000129 in different phenotypes of breast cancer cells was assessed in the present study. The results demonstrated that cell proliferation, migration and colony formation were significantly enhanced in MCF-7 cells overexpressed with hsa_circ_0000129. Conversely, hsa_circ_0000129 knockdown significantly inhibited cell proliferation, migration and colony formation of MDA-MB-468 cells compared with the control cells. Generally, higher proliferative, migratory and colony formation abilities indicate a more malignant phenotype in cancer cells (29,30). Thus, the results of the present suggest that hsa_circ_0000129 expression level in breast cancer plays an important role in cellular malignancy, which is closely associated with the malignancy degree of breast cancer. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that hsa_circ_0000129 may represent a promising prognostic biomarker for breast cancer.
In accordance with the results of the present study, several studies have investigated the role of circRNAs in breast cancer and other types of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer (8), and demonstrated the potential role of circRNAs as both diagnostic and prognostic markers. For example, Nair et al (31) cataloged the different circRNAs associated with three different types of breast cancer, triple negative, estrogen receptor positive and ErB2 overexpressing Her2-positive breast cancer cells. In addition, Wang et al (32) demonstrated that circ-UBE2D2 is upregulated in breast cancer cell lines and tissues, and is also closely associated with aggressive clinical characteristics and a poor prognosis (32). Furthermore, it has been reported that silencing circ-UBE2D2 notably inhibits the proliferative, migratory and invasive abilities of BC cells, and the in vivo delivery of oligonucleotides that inhibits circ-UBE2D2 significantly delays tumor growth (32). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the role of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer.
The potential underlying molecular mechanism of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer was assessed in the present study. EZH2, a polycomb group protein, is known to be associated with carcinogenesis (33,34). Polycomb group proteins are evolutionarily conserved regulators and act by silencing different growth regulatory genes (33,34). There are two main families of polycomb repressive complexes, 1 and 2 (PRC2), and EZH2 is a catalytic subunit of PRC2 (34). Previous studies have demonstrated that upregulated EZH2 expression is associated with different types of carcinoma, including ovarian, cervical, glioma, breast, prostate and renal cell cancer (33–35).
Previous studies have reported that upregulated EZH2 expression in breast cancer is associated with advanced form of the disease, higher grade of tumor staging, increased proliferation of tumor, increased chance of metastasis and poor long term overall survival (36–38). Xue et al (39) reported that arsenite, a known carcinogenic agent, upregulates hsa_circ_100284 expression in human ketratocyte (HaCaT) cells. The underlying molecular mechanism was also investigated, and it was demonstrated that hsa_circ_100284 serves as a sponge for miR-217 and indirectly upregulates EZH2. Notably, EZH2 upregulates the expression levels of cyclin D1 and K4, and promotes malignant changes in HaCaT cells. Furthermore, while investigating the association between EZH2 expression and risk of developing breast cancer in a case control study, Beca et al (40) discovered that EZH2 expression is an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
Similarly, the underlying molecular mechanism of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer was investigated in the present study, and the results demonstrated that EZH2 expression was upregulated in all three breast cancer cell lines. In addition, EZH2 expression was significantly enhanced in MCF-7 cells transfected with hsa_circ_0000129 vector, and significantly downregulated in MDA-MB-468 cells following hsa_circ_0000129 knockdown, compared with their respective control groups. Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that hsa_circ_0000129 exerts its role in breast cancer by regulating expression of the oncogene, EZH2.
A limitation of the present study is that EZH2 expression was only assessed in breast cancer cell lines, while its expression in human breast cancer tissues remains unknown. Thus, this will be the focus of prospective studies.
In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that hsa_circ_0000129 may represent a prognostic marker for patients with breast cancer. The role of hsa_circ_0000129 in breast cancer cell lines reveals a novel mechanism for tumorigenesis, as well as a potent target for interference of malignant progression. In addition, the carcinogenic molecular mechanism of hsa_circ_0000129 may be associated with upregulated EZH2 expression in breast cancer.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- EZH2
enhancer of zeste homolog 2
- TNM
tumor-node-metastasis
- RT
room temperature
Funding Statement
The present study was funded by the Joint Medical Research Program of Shanghai Jing'an District Science and Technology Commission and Health Commission [grant no. (JI)2016MS02] and the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2018YFC2002400).
Funding
The present study was funded by the Joint Medical Research Program of Shanghai Jing'an District Science and Technology Commission and Health Commission [grant no. (JI)2016MS02] and the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2018YFC2002400).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Authors' contributions
ZZ, ZS and SZ conceived and designed the present study, and analyzed and interpreted the data. XW and LH provided administrative support and interpreted the data. QL and HW performed the experiments, and collected and assembled the data. All authors contributed to drafting the initial manuscript and revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital (Shanghai, China; approval no. 2016MS02), and written informed consent was provided by all patients prior to the study start.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Wang X, Fang L. Advances in circular RNAs and their roles in breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:206. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0870-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:133–140. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00254-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harbeck N, Gnant M. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389:1134–1150. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31891-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Boffetta P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukemias. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:725–731. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brufsky AM. Long-term management of patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Concepts for sequential and combination endocrine-based therapies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;59:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Majeed W, Aslam B, Javed I, Khaliq T, Muhammad F, Ali A, Raza A. Breast cancer: Major risk factors and recent developments in treatment. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3353–3358. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.8.3353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jafari SH, Saadatpour Z, Salmaninejad A, Momeni F, Mokhtari M, Nahand JS, Rahmati M, Mirzaei H, Kianmehr M. Breast cancer diagnosis: Imaging techniques and biochemical markers. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:5200–5213. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qu S, Liu Z, Yang X, Zhou J, Yu H, Zhang R, Li H. The emerging functions and roles of circular RNAs in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018;414:301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Han YN, Xia SQ, Zhang YY, Zheng JH, Li W. Circular RNAs: A novel type of biomarker and genetic tools in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:64551–64563. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li Z, Chen Z, Hu G, Jiang Y. Roles of circular RNA in breast cancer: Present and future. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11:3945–3954. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou SY, Chen W, Yang SJ, Xu ZH, Hu JH, Zhang HD, Zhong SL, Tang JH. The emerging role of circular RNAs in breast cancer. Biosci Rep. 2019;39:BSR20190621. doi: 10.1042/BSR20190621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ng WL, MohdMohidin TB, Shukla K. Functional role of circular RNAs in cancer development and progression. RNA Biol. 2018;15:995–1005. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2018.1486659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lukiw WJ. Circular RNA (circRNA) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) Front Genet. 2013;4:307. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou J, Zhang WW, Peng F, Sun JY, He ZY, Wu SG. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0011946 suppresses the migration and invasion of the breast cancer cell line MCF-7 by targeting RFC3. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:535–544. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S155923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Du WW, Yang W, Liu E, Yang Z, Dhaliwal P, Yang BB. Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:2846–2858. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lü L, Sun J, Shi P, Kong W, Xu K, He B, Zhang S, Wang J. Identification of circular RNAs as a promising new class of diagnostic biomarkers for human breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:44096–44107. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li X, Ma F, Wu L, Zhang X, Tian J, Li J, Cao J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Wang L. Identification of Hsa_circ_0104824 as a potential biomarkers for breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020;19:1533033820960745. doi: 10.1177/1533033820960745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bian Q. Circular RNA PVT1 promotes the invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells through serving as a competing endogenous RNA for miR-204-5p. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:11817–11826. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S180850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 19.Yi Z, Li Y, Wu Y, Zeng B, Li H, Ren G, Wang X. Circular RNA 0001073 attenuates malignant biological behaviours in breast cancer cell and is delivered by nanoparticles to inhibit mice tumour growth. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:6157–6169. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S248822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tang YY, Zhao P, Zou TN, Duan JJ, Zhi R, Yang SY, Yang DC, Wang XL. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0001982 promotes breast cancer cell carcinogenesis through decreasing miR-143. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36:901–908. doi: 10.1089/dna.2017.3862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yin WB, Yan MG, Fang X, Guo JJ, Xiong W, Zhang RP. Circulating circular RNA hsa_circ_0001785 acts as a diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer detection. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;487:363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu J, Jiang Z, Chen C, Hu Q, Fu Z, Chen J, Wang Z, Wang Q, Li A, Marks JR, et al. CircIRAK3 sponges miR-3607 to facilitate breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2018;430:179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hayes DF, Allred C, Anderson BO, et al. Breast. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. Springer; New York, NY: 2009. pp. 347–376. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chekhun VF, Lukianova NY, Chekhun SV, Bezdieniezhnykh NO, Zadvorniy TV, Borikun TV, Polishchuk LZ, Klyusov OМ. Association of CD44+CD24−/low with markers of aggressiveness and plasticity of cell lines and tumors of patients with breast cancer. Exp Oncol. 2017;39:203–211. doi: 10.31768/2312-8852.2017.39(3):203-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tang T, Zhu Q, Li X, Zhu G, Deng S, Wang Y, Ni L, Chen X, Zhang Y, Xia T, et al. Protease Nexin I is a feedback regulator of EGF/PKC/MAPK/EGR1 signaling in breast cancer cells metastasis and stemness. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:649. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1882-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Croker AK, Goodale D, Chu J, Postenka C, Hedley BD, Hess DA, Allan AL. High aldehyde dehydrogenase and expression of cancer stem cell markers selects for breast cancer cells with enhanced malignant and metastatic ability. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:2236–2252. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00455.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu Z, Zhou Y, Liang G, Ling Y, Tan W, Tan L, Andrews R, Zhong W, Zhang X, Song E, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_001783 regulates breast cancer progression via sponging miR-200c-3p. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:55. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1287-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tasharrofi B, Ghafouri-Fard S. Long non-coding RNAs as regulators of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in cancer. Klin Onkol. 2018;31:95–102. doi: 10.14735/amko201895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roversi FM, Olalla Saad ST, Machado-Neto JA. Serine peptidase inhibitor Kunitz type 2 (SPINT2) in cancer development and progression. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;101:278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nair AA, Niu N, Tang X, Thompson KJ, Wang L, Kocher JP, Subramanian S, Kalari KR. Circular RNAs and their associations with breast cancer subtypes. Oncotarget. 2016;7:80967–80979. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y, Li J, Du C, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang L. Upregulated circular RNA circ-UBE2D2 predicts poor prognosis and promotes breast cancer progression by sponging miR-1236 and miR-1287. Transl Oncol. 2019;12:1305–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martinez AM, Cavalli G. The role of polycomb group proteins in cell cycle regulation during development. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1189–1197. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.11.2781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Margueron R, Reinberg D. The polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature. 2011;469:343–349. doi: 10.1038/nature09784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang X, Hu B, Shen H, Zhou H, Xue X, Chen Y, Chen S, Han Y, Yuan B, Zhao H, et al. Clinical and prognostic relevance of EZH2 in breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;75:218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boostani F, Dolatkhah R, Fakhrjou A, Farassati F, Sanaat Z. Association of clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes with EZH2 expression in patients with breast cancer in East Azerbaijan, Iran. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:449–457. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S149210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shen L, Cui J, Liang S, Pang Y, Liu P. Update of research on the role of EZH2 in cancer progression. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:321–324. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S42453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pourakbar S, Pluard TJ, Accurso AD, Farassati F. Ezh2. A novel target in detection and therapy of breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:2685–2687. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S138777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xue J, Liu Y, Luo F, Lu X, Xu H, Liu X, Lu L, Yang Q, Chen C, Fan W, Liu Q. Circ100284, via miR-217 regulation of EZH2, is involved in the arsenite-accelerated cell cycle of human keratinocytes in carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863:753–763. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Beca F, Kensler K, Glass B, Schnitt SJ, Tamimi RM, Beck AH. EZH2 protein expression in normal breast epithelium and risk of breast cancer: Results from the Nurses' health studies. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:21. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0817-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon request.