Abstract
The current studies focus on the association between COVID‐19 and certain comorbidities. To the best of our knowledge, the association between severe COVID‐19 and dermatologic comorbidities has not been reported yet. In this study, we aimed to describe the dermatologic comorbidities of patients with severe COVID‐19 and compare it with the control group. Patients who have died at Uşak Training and Research Hospital due to COVID‐19 and other diseases in the COVID‐19 Intensive Care Units and Internal Medicine Intensive Care Units were recruited into the study. Two groups were compared with each other regarding the most common dermatologic comorbidities. A total of 198 patients including 111 patients with COVID‐19 and 87 age and sex‐matched patients with other diseases were enrolled in the study. The most common dermatologic comorbidities were pruritus (8.1%), eczema (6.3%), skin infections (3.6%), leukocytoclastic vasculitis (1.8%), and urticaria (0.9%) in the COVID‐19 group while they were skin infections (9.2%), eczema (3.4%), pruritus (2.3%), and urticaria (1.1%) in the control group. None of patients in the control group had leukocytoclastic vasculitis. There were no significant differences between COVID‐19 and control groups in terms of pruritus, eczema, skin infections, and urticaria (P values were .117, .517, .181, .505, and 1.000, respectively). In conclusion, although it is not statistically significant, it appears that pruritus and leukocytoclastic vasculitis are more common in severe COVID‐19 patients. These cytokines‐related diseases in the immuno‐cutaneous systems may give some clues on the COVID‐19 severity. Further studies are required to elucidate the relationship between the immuno‐cutaneous system and COVID‐19 severity.
Keywords: dermatologic comorbidities, eczema, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pruritus, SARS‐CoV2, severe COVID‐19, skin infections, urticaria
1. INTRODUCTION
Coronavirus is continuing its spread without slowing down and the number of confirmed cases has recently passed 71 million. As of 14 December 2020, the COVID‐19 pandemic has resulted in over 1.6 million deaths across the world. 1
The current studies focus on the association between COVID‐19 and certain comorbidities. We have recently reported that the most common dermatologic comorbidities in patients infected with COVID‐19 were superficial fungal infections, psoriasis, and eczema. 2 However, this cross‐sectional study has investigated the presence of dermatologic comorbidities in COVID‐19 patients, regardless of severity.
It has been reported that COVID‐19 triggers an excessive immune response known as cytokine storms. 3 , 4 A cytokine storm which includes increasing levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐18, IFN gamma, and interestingly IL‐10 is reported to be the main factors for the severity and fatality of the disease. 4 There are numerous dermatologic diseases that have an immunological infrastructure that includes cytokine releases. 5 , 6 Therefore, certain dermatologic comorbidities may give hints about the COVID‐19 severity. To the best of our knowledge, the association between severe COVID‐19 and dermatologic comorbidities has not been reported yet.
In this study, we aimed to describe the dermatologic comorbidities of patients with severe COVID‐19 and compare it with the control group.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients who have died at Uşak Training and Research Hospital due to COVID‐19 and other diseases in the COVID‐19 Intensive Care Units and Internal Medicine Intensive Care Units were recruited into the study. These patients were divided into two groups; COVID‐19 and control group. The age and gender‐matched control group was selected at random from among patients who have died at Internal Medicine Intensive Care Units. Severe COVID‐19 cases have been admitted to the intensive care unit according to the following Turkish COVID‐19 guideline criteria: respiratory failure necessitating mechanical ventilation, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min, PaO2/FiO2 < 300, multilobar infiltration, delirium or loss of consciousness, SpO2 < 90% or PaO2 < 70 mmHg despite 5 L/min oxygen therapy, high levels of troponin and arrhythmia, Lactate>2 mmol presence of livedo reticularis, and hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and a decrease from usual SBP more than 40 mmHg and mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg, tachycardia >100/min. 7 , 8
Two groups were determined in terms of common dermatologic comorbidities. Dermatological comorbidities classified into five subgroups as follow: pruritus, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, urticaria, eczema, and skin infections. Two groups were compared with each other regarding the most common dermatologic comorbidities. The patients under 18 years of age and pregnant were excluded.
The data were assessed in SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) package program. Descriptive statistics are given by giving frequency and percentages. Student's t‐test and Wilcoxon's test were used in terms of normal distribution in continuous variables while Pearson's Chi‐square test and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. The approval of the Institutional Review Board was received (IRB approval status [approval date and number: 24.07.2020/612.01.99]).
3. RESULTS
A total of 198 patients including 111 patients with COVID‐19 and 87 age and sex‐matched patients with other diseases were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients with COVID‐19 was 71.11 ± 14.30 years, while the mean age of the control group was 73.17 ± 15.73 years. There were 46 (41.4%) females and 65 (58.6%) males in the COVID‐19 group, while 39 (44.8%) females and 48 (55.2%) males in the control group. No significant differences were found between two groups in terms of age and gender (P = .110 and P = .633, respectively). The cytokine related laboratory characteristics of the patients are seen in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
The cytokine‐related laboratory characteristic of patients
| Parameters | COVID‐19 group | Control group | Normal value | P values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (×103/μl) | 11.84 ± 8.69 | 13.52 ± 9.64 | 4‐10.5 | .036 |
| Eosinophils (×103/μl) | 0.27 ± 0.13 | 0.46 ± 0.14 | 00.2‐0.5 | .001 |
| MPV (fl) | 9.84 ± 1.30 | 9.89 ± 1.34 | 6.5‐12 | .900 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 135.76 ± 84.36 | 126.45 ± 91.83 | 0.1‐5 | .255 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/ml) | 5.70 ± 15.58 | 9.07 ± 16.09 | <0.01 | .001 |
| D‐dimer (μg/L) | 2441.63 ± 1547.77 | 3417.43 ± 1232.91 | 0‐550 | .006 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dl) | 510.53 ± 162.97 | 379.15 ± 125.87 | 180‐350 | .037 |
Abbreviations: CRP, C‐reactive protein; MPV, mean platelet volume; WBC, white blood cells.
Twenty (18.0%) patients with the COVID‐19 group and 14 (16.1%) patients with a control group had dermatologic comorbidities for the last 3 years. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding the frequency of dermatologic comorbidities (P = .721)
The most common dermatologic comorbidities were pruritus (8.1%), eczema (6.3%), skin infections (3.6%), leukocytoclastic vasculitis (1.8%), and urticaria (0.9%) in the COVID‐19 group while skin infections (9.2%), eczema (3.4%), pruritus (2.3%), and urticaria (1.1%) in the control group. None of the patients in the control group had leukocytoclastic vasculitis (Tables 2 and 3).
TABLE 2.
The dermatologic comorbidities of the severe COVID‐19 patients for the last 3 years
| Number | Age | Gender | Diagnosis | Admission time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 77 | Male | Pruritus | In a year/3 years |
| 2 | 86 | Male | Pruritus | In a year |
| 3 | 93 | Female | Pruritus/Contact dermatitis | In a year/3 years |
| 4 | 73 | Female | Contact dermatitis and pruritus | In 3 years |
| 5 | 63 | Female | Urticaria and pruritus/LCV | In a year/3 years |
| 6 | 73 | Female | Actinic keratosis/pruritus | In a year/3 years |
| 7 | 57 | Male | Pruritus | In 3 years |
| 8 | 69 | Male | Pruritus | In 3 years |
| 9 | 82 | Male | Pruritus | In 3 years |
| 10 | 76 | Female | Tinea pedis/Actinic keratosis | In a year/3 years |
| 11 | 59 | Male | Skin tag, solar lentigo | In a year |
| 12 | 52 | Male | Tinea corporis | In a year |
| 13 | 68 | Male | Seborrheic dermatitis | In a year/3 years |
| 14 | 72 | Male | Bacterial infection/LCV | In a year |
| 15 | 62 | Male | Actinic keratosis/seborheic dermaitits | In a year/3 years |
| 16 | 67 | Male | Seborrheic dermatits | In 3 years |
| 17 | 60 | Male | Psoriasis vulgaris | In 3 years |
| 18 | 82 | Female | Molluscum contagiosum | In 3 years |
| 19 | 64 | Male | Contact dermatitis | In 3 years |
| 20 | 81 | Female | Contact dermatitis | In 3 years |
Abbreviation: LCV, leukocytoclastic vasculitis.
TABLE 3.
The dermatologic comorbidities of the control group for the last 3 years
| Number | Age | Gender | Diagnosis | Admission time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84 | Male | Pruritus | In a year/3 years |
| 2 | 74 | Male | Pruritus | In 3 years |
| 3 | 61 | Male | Zoster | In 3 years |
| 4 | 83 | Female | Candidiyasis | In a year/3 years |
| 5 | 92 | Female | Callus | In a year/3 years |
| 6 | 46 | Female | Herpes simplex | In a year/3 years |
| 7 | 54 | Male | Eczema/Tinea pedis | In a year/3 years |
| 8 | 39 | Female | Eczema | In a year/3 years |
| 9 | 77 | Male | Actinic keratosis | In a year/3 years |
| 10 | 73 | Female | Urticaria | In 3 years |
| 11 | 88 | Female | Tine pedis and Zoster | In 3 years |
| 12 | 59 | Male | Folliculitis | In 3 years |
| 13 | 60 | Male | Eritema intertrigo | In 3 years |
| 14 | 76 | Male | Dermatitis/Tinea pedis | In 3 years |
There were no significant differences between COVID‐19 and control groups in terms of pruritus, eczema, skin infections, and urticaria (P values were .117, .517, .181, .505, and 1.000, respectively; Table 4). In the COVID‐19 group, 4 (44.4%) out of 14 patients with pruritus presented in a year before COVID‐19 while five (55.6%) presented in between 1 and 3 years.
TABLE 4.
The differences between dermatologic comorbidities between severe COVID‐19 and control group in the last 3 years
| Diseases | COVID‐19 group | Control group | P values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pruritus | 9 (8.1%) | 2 (2.3%) | .117 |
| Urticaria | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (1.1%) | 1.000 |
| Eczema | 7 (6.3%) | 3 (3.4%) | .517 |
| Skin infection | 4 (3.6%) | 8 (9.2%) | .181 |
| Leukocytoclastic vasculitis | 2 (1.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | .505 |
4. DISCUSSION
Severe COVID‐19 is mainly associated with increased certain inflammatory cytokines and mediators. It shares many common aspects regarding cytokine storms with other infectious and non‐infectious diseases including dengue viruses, Ebola virus infection, multiple sclerosis, pancreatitis, graft‐vs‐host disease, or multiple organ dysfunction syndromes. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13
Siddiqia et al reported there is a significant increasing number of inflammatory cytokines along with biomarkers including IL6, IL‐7, macrophage inflammatory protein 1‐α, TNF‐α, CRP, D‐dimer, ferritin, and procalcitonin in the hyperinflammation stage of COVID‐19. 14 , 15 In our study, inflammatory markers such as CRP, D‐dimer, procalcitonin levels increased in patients with COVID‐19. There are many dermatologic diseases that are associated with increased certain inflammatory cytokines and mediators. These cytokines and mediators may lead to an increased risk of getting and severity of certain systemic diseases. The relationship between psoriasis and cardiovascular diseases, atopic dermatitis and asthma, or pityriasis versicolor and Helicobacter pylori infection can be discussed in this context. 16 Therefore, previous inflammatory dermatologic diseases may give some hints about the immunological basis of patients. 17 In our study, despite the similar frequency of previous dermatologic comorbidities in both groups, we found some what different dermatological comorbidities profiles. These differences existed more prominent in cytokine related diseases such as pruritus, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and skin infections.
A previous study reported from China has revealed that severe COVID‐19 cases had common comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, hepatitis B infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, chronic kidney diseases, and malignancy, respectively. 3 In our previous study, we reported that the infection risk of COVID‐19 may be related to fungal infections and using immunosuppressive agents in certain diseases such as psoriasis. However, this study did not address the association between severe COVID‐19 and dermatologic comorbidities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the association between severe and fatal COVID‐19 and dermatologic comorbidities. In this study, although there was no statistically significant relationship between pruritus and severe COVID‐19, we found patients who have presented to dermatology outpatient clinics for pruritus in the last 3 years were 3.5 times more common in severe COVID‐19 patients when compared to control group. IL‐31 is one of the main cytokines in the pruritus that is produced by CD4 + T helper cells in the setting of IL‐4 secretion. Numerous dermatologic diseases including chronic urticaria, prurigo nodularis, atopic dermatitis, etc. are related to the increased serum IL‐31 levels. Although it mainly secreted from Th2 cells, it has recently been reported that secretion of IL‐31 is crucial to inhibit Th2‐type response in the lung. 18 , 19 In addition, IL‐31 is known as the part of the IL‐6 family that has both inflammation and neuropathic properties. 20 Meanwhile, previous studies have supposed that IL‐2 and IFN gamma that are secreted from T1 cells can be related to the TRP channels resulted in chronic itching. IL‐2 is a strong itch‐related cytokine in both healthy people and patients. Injection of IL‐2 into healthy people or patients with atopic dermatitis stimulates 2 to 3 days lasting itch. 21 , 22 , 23 It is known that itch‐related cytokines such as IL‐2, IFN gamma, IL 6 are increasing in the cytokine storms. Considering the increasing high numbers of patients with pruritus in the COVID‐19 group, it can be speculated that patients who have idiopathic pruritus history may prone the more severe COVID‐19 diseases. Therefore, we believe that elderly patients who have pruritus should be warned to avoid unnecessary applying for pandemic hospitals unless there are serious grounds. Nevertheless, large‐sample‐based further studies are needed in order to see the exact effect of pruritus on severe COVID‐19.
In this study, we found that eczema and urticaria had approximately the same incidences in both groups. Furthermore, two patients with COVID‐19 had leukocytoclastic vasculitis while none of the control group had leukocytoclastic vasculitis. It has been shown that IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐8, and TNF factors are increased in circulation in leukocytoclastic vasculitis. 24 , 25 There are also numerous reports that proposed the association between leukocytoclastic vasculitis and COVID‐19. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 Moreover, it has been reported that livedoid and necrotic lesions mostly appear in elderly patients and those with severe COVID‐19. 30 In concordance with previous studies, our result suggests that a history of leukocytoclastic vasculitis may be an indicator of severe COVID‐19.
It is well established that the main cause of death in COVID‐19 patients is due to hyperactivation of the immune system rather than immunosuppression. SARS‐CoV‐2 can promptly activate pathogenic Th1 cells to produce pro‐inflammatory cytokines including IL 6, IL 2, and TNF‐α in severe COVID‐19 cases. 4 This increased immune status may be one of the causes of less skin infections in patients with severe COVID‐19. Given results from our previous and current study, it can be concluded that patients who have the immunosuppressive condition may be more vulnerable to become infected with COVID‐19 while patients whose immune system hyperactive may be more vulnerable to getting severe COVID‐19. 2 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34
In conclusion, although it is not statistically significant, it appears that pruritus and leukocytoclastic vasculitis are more common in severe COVID‐19 patients. These cytokines‐related diseases in the immuno‐cutaneous systems may give some clues on the COVID‐19 severity. Further studies are required to elucidate the relationship between the immuno‐cutaneous system and COVID‐19 severity.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Kutlu Ö, Öğüt ND, Erbağcı E, Metin A. Dermatologic comorbidities of the patients with severe COVID‐19: A case‐control study. Dermatologic Therapy. 2021;34:e14731 10.1111/dth.14731
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019
- 2. Kutlu Ö, Metin A. Dermatological diseases presented before COVID‐19: are patients with psoriasis and superficial fungal infections more vulnerable to the COVID‐19? Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(4):e13509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, et al. China medical treatment expert group for COVID‐19. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID‐19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wacharapluesadee S, Kaewpom T, Ampoot W, et al. Evaluating the efficiency of specimen pooling for PCR‐based detection of COVID‐19. J Med Virol. 2020;92:2193‐2199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Coondoo A. Cytokines in dermatology: a basic overview. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56:368‐374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Holman DM, Kalaaji AN. Cytokines in dermatology. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:520‐524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li HY, Guo Q, Song WD, et al. Mortality among severe community‐acquired pneumonia patients depends on combinations of 2007 IDSA/ATS minor criteria. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;38:141‐145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66926/eriskin-hasta-tedavisi.html
- 9. Basler CF. Molecular pathogenesis of viral hemorrhagic fever. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:551‐561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Teijaro JR. Cytokine storms in infectious diseases. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:501‐503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ferrara JL. Cytokine dysregulation as a mechanism of graft versus host disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 1993;5:794‐799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Link H. The cytokine storm in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 1998;4:12‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang H, Ma S. The cytokine storm and factors determining the sequence and severity of organ dysfunction in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:711‐715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Siddiqi HK, Mehra MR. COVID‐19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: a clinical‐therapeutic staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:405‐407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, et al. The use of anti‐inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): the perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kutlu Ö, Doğan Z, Ekşioğlu HM, et al. Relationship between helicobacter pylori infection and pityriasis versicolor:can helicobacter pylori infection be a new etiologic factor for pityriasis versicolor? Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50:771‐775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schön MP, Berking C, Biedermann T, et al. COVID‐19 and immunological regulations: from basic and translational aspects to clinical implications. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020;18(8):795‐807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bilsborough J, Mudri S, Chadwick E, Harder B, Dillon SR. IL‐31 receptor (IL‐31RA) knockout mice exhibit elevated responsiveness to oncostatin M. J Immunol. 2010;185:6023‐6030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Edukulla R, Singh B, Jegga AG, Sontake V, Dillon SR, Madala SK. Th2 cytokines augment IL‐31/IL‐31RA interactions via STAT6‐dependent IL‐31RA expression. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:13510‐13520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Slaets H, Nelissen S, Janssens K, et al. Oncostatin M reduces lesion size and promotes functional recovery and neurite outgrowth after spinal cord injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;50:1142‐1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang X, Huang J, McNaughton PA. NGF rapidly increases membrane expression of TRPV1 heat‐gated ion channels. EMBO J. 2005;24:4211‐4223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gouin O, L'Herondelle K, Lebonvallet N, et al. TRPV1 and TRPA1 in cutaneous neurogenic and chronic inflammation: pro‐inflammatory response induced by their activation and their sensitization. Protein Cell. 2017;8:644‐661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Azim AA, Farag AS, El‐Maleek Hassan DA, et al. Role of Interleukin‐2 in uremic pruritus among attendants of AL‐Zahraa Hospital dialysis unit. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60:211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Shavit E, Alavi A, Sibbald RG. Vasculitis‐what do we have to know? A review of literature. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018;17:218‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nalbant S, Koc B, Top C, et al. Hypersensitivity vasculitis and cytokines. Rheumatol Int. 2002;22:244‐248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mayor‐Ibarguren A, Feito‐Rodriguez M, Quintana Castanedo L, Ruiz‐Bravo E, Montero Vega D, Herranz‐Pinto P. Cutaneous small vessel vasculitis secondary to COVID‐19 infection: a case report. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e541‐e542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dominguez‐Santas M, Diaz‐Guimaraens B, Garcia Abellas P, Moreno‐Garcia del Real C, Burgos‐Blasco P, Suarez‐Valle A. Cutaneous small‐vessel vasculitis associated with novel 2019 coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (COVID‐19). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e536‐e537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Camprodon Gómez M, González‐Cruz C, Ferrer B, Barberá MJ. Leucocytoclastic vasculitis in a patient with COVID‐19 with positive SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR in skin biopsy. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e238039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Negrini S, Guadagno A, Greco M, Parodi A, Burlando M. An unusual case of bullous haemorrhagic vasculitis in a COVID‐19 patient. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020. 10.1111/jdv.16760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Galván Casas C, Català A, Carretero Hernández G, et al. Classification of the cutaneous manifestations of COVID‐19: a rapid prospective nationwide consensus study in Spain with 375 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:71‐77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schwartz RA, Pradhan S, Murrell DF, et al. COVID‐19 and immunosuppressive therapy in dermatology. Dermatol Ther. 2020;e14140 10.1111/dth.14140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kutlu Ö, Metin A. A case of exacerbation of psoriasis after oseltamivir and hydroxychloroquine in a patient with COVID‐19: will cases of psoriasis increase after COVID‐19 pandemic? Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Elmas ÖF, Demirbaş A, Kutlu Ö, et al. Psoriasis and COVID‐19: a narrative review with treatment considerations. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e13858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Karadag AS, Aslan Kayıran M, Lotti T, Wollina U. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulator therapy for rare or uncommon skin disorders in pandemic days. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
