Skip to main content
Journal of Travel Medicine logoLink to Journal of Travel Medicine
letter
. 2020 Nov 4;27(7):taaa188. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa188

Cutaneous leishmaniasis and health-related quality of life in returning travellers to the UK

Emilia Peleva 1, Stephen L Walker 2,3,4,
PMCID: PMC7883819  PMID: 33145597

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is associated with psychological morbidity and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in endemic countries.1 Although CL is also reported in travellers,2,3 there is little information on the impact of CL on HRQoL in this population. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire was used to measure the impact on CL on HRQoL in returning travellers.

The DLQI is a widely used questionnaire in dermatology, comprising 10 questions on symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships and treatment. Individuals rate the impact of their dermatological condition over the past week as ‘not at all’, ‘a little’, ‘a lot’ or ‘very much’ for each domain. The scores to each question are added, giving a total score from 0 to 30 (maximum impairment of quality of life).4

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of returning travellers diagnosed with CL seen at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, UK, between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2020. Patient demographics, disease characteristics and DLQI scores were summarized using descriptive statistics. Diagnosis was confirmed using skin biopsy, with visualization of amastigotes by microscopy-culture and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We excluded individuals with mucosal or mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

Fifty-eight individuals with CL were eligible for inclusion. The majority were male (67%) and their age ranged between 2 to 76 years [median 37.0 years, interquartile range (IQR) 29.5]. No individuals were human immunodeficiency virus infected but one patient was immunosuppressed. The majority of individuals (n = 39, 67%) had a single lesion, 10 (17%) had two lesions and nine (16%) had three or more lesions. Lesions were distributed on the upper limb (n = 22, 38%), lower limb (n = 22, 38%), head and neck (n = 19, 33%), and other sites (n = 5, 9%). The size of skin lesions ranged between 0.5 cm to 11 cm. The causative species identified using PCR were L. Viannia subgenus in 32 individuals (55%), L. donovani complex in 12 (21%), L. major in eight individuals, L. mexicana in two, L. tropica in two and unknown species in two. The likely regions of acquisition were the Americas (n = 35, 60%), Europe (n = 10), Middle East (n = 8), Africa (n = 4) and South Asia (n = 1).

DLQI data were available for 46 adults (79%). The median age was 37.0 years (IQR 29.5) and 63% were male. The mean total DLQI score was 7.3 (SD 4.6, minimum 0, maximum 20), corresponding to a moderate effect on HRQoL.5 Of these, the disease had no effect on quality of life in four individuals (9%), a small effect in 13 (28%), moderate effect in 18 (39%), and very large effect in 11 (24%). The highest effects were observed on the physical symptoms and feelings, work and school, and leisure domains. The lowest effects were in the daily activities and personal relationships domains. No significant difference was observed with respect to age, gender, size or number of lesions present. This may be due to the small numbers in this cohort.

In the present study, 63% of patients reported a moderate or higher impact on their quality of life. These results are similar to data from endemic countries.6–8 Studies in Brazil and Iran found that 70% and 43% of CL patients, respectively, had a moderate or high impact on their HRQoL using the DLQI.7,8 The ‘symptoms and feelings’ and ‘work and school’ domains were the most affected, as in our study.7,8 A case-control study in Turkey showed higher levels of depression and anxiety and lower quality of life in patients with CL compared to controls. Lesions and scars on visible areas, such as the face and hands, and in younger patients, seem to lead to a greater negative impact.1,6 Ulcerated lesions were associated with greater effect on HRQoL.7

Our small retrospective study suggests that CL diagnosed in non-endemic settings is associated with a similar reduction in HRQoL to that reported in affected individuals in endemic settings. However, further work is required to examine the long-term impact of CL on HRQoL in both types of settings particularly where access to timely and effective therapy is difficult.

Authors’ contributions

EP did the literature search, design, data analysis and manuscript writing. SW did the literature search, design and manuscript writing.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgement

No funding was received for this study.

Contributor Information

Emilia Peleva, Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.

Stephen L Walker, Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

References

  • 1. Pires  M, Wright  B, Kaye  PM  et al.  The impact of leishmaniasis on mental health and psychosocial well-being: a systematic review. PLoS One  2019; 14:e0223313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Boggild  AK, Caumes  E, Grobusch  MP  et al.  Cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers and migrants: a 20-year GeoSentinel surveillance network analysis. J Travel Med  2019; 26:taz055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Blum  J, Buffet  P, Visser  L  et al.  LeishMan recommendations for treatment of cutaneous and mucosal Leishmaniasis in Travelers, 2014. J Travel Med  2014; 21:116–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Finlay  AY, Khan  GK. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol  1994; 19:210–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hongbo  Y, Thomas  CL, Harrison  MA  et al.  Translating the science of quality of life into practice: what do dermatology life quality index scores mean?  J Invest Dermatol  2005; 125:659–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yanik  M, Gurel  MS, Simsek  Z, Kati  M. The psychological impact of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Clin Exp Dermatol  2004; 29:464–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Toledo  AC  Jr, da  Silva  RE, Carmo  RF  et al.  Assessment of the quality of life of patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2009-2010. A pilot study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg  2013; 107:335–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vares  B, Mohseni  M, Heshmatkhah  A  et al.  Quality of life in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Arch Iran Med  2013; 16:474–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Travel Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES