Abstract
Clinical evidence suggests the central nervous system (CNS) is frequently impacted by SARS-CoV-2 infection, either directly or indirectly, although mechanisms remain unclear. Pericytes are perivascular cells within the brain that are proposed as SARS-CoV-2 infection points1. Here we show that pericyte-like cells (PLCs), when integrated into a cortical organoid, are capable of infection with authentic SARS-CoV-2. Prior to infection, PLCs elicited astrocytic maturation and production of basement membrane components, features attributed to pericyte functions in vivo. While traditional cortical organoids showed little evidence of infection, PLCs within cortical organoids served as viral ‘replication hubs’, with virus spreading to astrocytes and mediating inflammatory type I interferon transcriptional responses. Therefore, PLC-containing cortical organoids (PCCOs) represent a new ‘assembloid’ model2 that supports SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication in neural tissue, and PCCOs serve as an experimental model for neural infection.
Keywords: Cortical brain Organoid (CO), PLCs Containing Cortical Organoid (PCCO), SARS-CoV-2, Astrocytes, Viral replication hub
Initially thought of as primarily a respiratory infection, SARS-CoV-2 is now implicated in substantial central nervous system (CNS) pathology3,4. CNS symptoms include ischemic strokes, hemorrhages, seizures, encephalopathy, encephalitis-meningitis, anosmia, post-infectious syndromes, and neurovasculopathy, collectively described in up to 85% of ICU patients5-8. Several reports appear to meet established criteria for infectious encephalitis9.
SARS-CoV-2 can utilize angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a receptor although other receptors have been proposed10,11. Recent studies on single cell RNA-seq (sc-RNA-seq) datasets indicate low levels of ACE2 expression in brain cells, however, expression is relatively high in some neurovascular unit (NVU) components, particularly in brain pericytes12-14. Autopsy series have suggested the potential for SARS-CoV-2 to spread throughout the brain, especially within vascular and immune cells. They note ischaemic brain lesions accompanied by widespread activation of astrocytes and cell death1,15. The potential for a SARS-CoV-2 elicited neurovasculopathy supports the development of new models to study tropism and pathology.
Brain pericytes are derived from neural crest stem cells (NCSCs), and are uniquely positioned in the neurovascular unit (NVU), physically linking endothelial and astrocytic cells16. Embedded within the basement membrane, pericytes connect, coordinate and regulate signals from neighboring cells to generate responses critical for CNS function in both healthy and disease states, including blood-brain barrier permeability, neuroinflammation, neuronal differentiation, and neurogenesis in the adult brain17-19.
We found that GFP+ pericyte-like cells (PLCs) generated in vitro from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived NCSCs expressed the standard pericyte markers NG2 and PDGFR-b (Fig. 1a-b)20. We detected appreciable ACE2 mRNA and protein in 2D cultured PLCs compared with cultured human neural precursors (Extended Data Fig. 1a-d). To assess SARS-CoV-2 PLC tropism, we exposed PLCs to authentic SARS-CoV-2 at MOI 0.5, then harvested supernatant and cells daily (Fig. 1c). We found that the percentage of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (SNP)-positive cells and viral RNA as measured by qRT-PCR increased daily up to 72 hours post infection (h.p.i.), from 0% to 65% SNP positive, with viral RNA load increasing up to ~1000-fold (Fig. 1d-e). Plaque assay from supernatants on Vero E6 cells showed ~100-fold increased infectious virus production at 24 h.p.i with increased virus particles as well as viral titers compared to baseline, suggesting viral production by PLCs (Fig. 1f-g)21.
Demonstrating the infectability of PLCs led us to explore their effects on SARS-CoV-2 tropism within cortical brain organoids (COs). To this end, we developed an ‘assembloid’ in which GFP+ PLCs are integrated into mature COs. We thus generated PLC-containing cortical organoids (PCCOs), by seeding 2x105 GFP+ PLCs into wells containing COs at 60div (days in vitro) (Fig. 2a). By 74div, using tissue clearing and light sheet microscopy, we observed GFP+ cells integrating into COs as cell clusters, subsequently spreading across the surface and penetrating into the CTIP2+ cortical plate-like zone in COs (Fig. 2b-c).
We found that PCCOs maintained similar structural architecture and cellular compositions as traditional COs (Fig. 2d-f and Extended Data Fig. 2a-b). The GFP+ PLCs within PCCOs show GFP mRNA expression and retained standard pericyte markers expression (Extended Data Fig. 3a-b). However, we found that within PCCOs, PLCs attuned GFAP-positive astrocyte expression and morphology, which more closely resembled a classically described ‘star’-shape with end-feet like structures seen in mature astrocytes that were adjacent to PLCs (Fig. 2g)22,23. These results evidenced features of astrocytic maturation compared to traditional COs24. Moreover, we detected laminin-b1 protein adjacent to PLCs, suggesting accumulation of basement membrane (BM), which is normally absent from traditional COs (Fig. 2h-i). Confocal imaging confirmed localization of astrocytes and PLCs with laminin (Fig. 2j). Together, these results suggest PCCOs recapitulate the structural architecture of PLCs-BM-astrocytes described within the vertebral neurovascular unit (Fig. 2k)16.
We additionally characterized PCCOs by single cell RNA-seq (sc-RNA-seq). Compared to COs, PCCOs showed an ~23% shift from progenitor to neuronal populations, which was validated with TBR1 immunostaining (Fig. 2e, Extended Data Fig. 4a-d and Supplementary Dataset 1)25-27. Tandem mass spectrometry using isobaric labeling of PCCOs compared with COs supported these results, revealing that GFAP, TBR1, DCX, and STMN2 formed an upregulated protein module, suggesting an effect of PLCs on neuronal differentiation in PCCOs (Extended Data Fig. 5a-b, Supplementary Dataset 1).
We next exposed PCCOs to SARS-CoV-2 at MOI 0.5 for 72h (Fig. 3a). Compared with traditional COs that showed scant neuroglial cells positive for the established viral SNP protein as reported28,29, PCCOs showed a significantly higher proportion of SNP+ cells (10% vs. 1% in PCCOs vs. COs, p <0.0001, t-test, Fig. 3b-f, Extended Data Fig. 6a-b, Supplementary Dataset 2). qRT-PCR showed a corresponding ~50-fold increase in viral RNA in exposed PCCOs over COs (Fig. 3g, Supplementary Dataset 2).
We then compared the cellular infection vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 in COs vs. PCCOs. In COs, we found <1% NeuN+/SNP+ cells or GFAP+/SNP+ cells and no discernable effect of viral exposure on CO characteristics (Extended Data Fig. 7a-e). In many ways, it seemed that the presence of SARS-CoV-2 was innocuous to COs. In contrast, in PCCOs we found the majority of SNP+ cells co-localized with GFP+ PLCs and surrounding GFAP+ astrocytes in virus-exposed PCCOs (Fig. 3e-e’ and h). Confocal imaging demonstrated that astrocytes were not only adjacent to the infected PLCs but were themselves SNP+ (Fig. 3i). To transcriptionally profile cellular constituents, we performed sc-RNA-seq at 72h.p.i. We detected SARS-CoV-2 reads in ~2% of cells in PCCOs, overwhelmingly confined to astrocytes, but not neurons (Fig. 3j-m). There were no detectable SARS-CoV-2 reads in infected COs (Supplementary Dataset 1). These data suggest that infection of astrocytes is mediated by the presence of the PLCs population.
Finally, to explore pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in PCCOs, we performed immunostaining and observed a significant increase (~20%) in percent of cells evidencing programmed cell death (cleaved caspase 3 and p53-positive) in infected PCCOs (Fig. 4a-b, Supplementary Dataset 2). sc-RNA-seq indicated that the source of the cell death was largely confined to astrocytes, consistent with the described selective vulnerability (Fig. 4c)30. Gene ontology (GO) term analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) specific to astrocytes highlighted inflammatory and genotoxic stress activation (Fig. 4d). This correlated with activation of type I interferon transcriptional response, and with upregulation of IFIT1, IFI44, ISG15 in virus exposed compared to mock infected PCCOs (Fig. 4e, Supplementary Dataset 3)31. Several type I interferons signaling cascade genes (STAT1, STAT2) and an ISG15-effector gene (USP18) were also upregulated (Fig. 4f, Supplementary Dataset 2)32. Increased expression of ISG15 was confirmed by qRT-PCR in infected PCCOs (Fig. 4g). These results implicate astrocytic pathology in SARS-CoV-2 inflammatory brain pathology, mediated through the type I interferon pathway.
Here we demonstrate that PLCs can be productively infected by SARS-CoV-2 and through integration of PLCs into COs, we established a novel PCCO ‘assembloid’. Within PCCOs, we found PLCs establish characteristics of PLCs-BM-astrocytes structure and increase the cellular proportion of neuronal population, mimicking reported functions of human brain pericytes in vivo. Upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2, we observed robust infection within PCCOs and consequent induction of neuronal death and type I interferon responses. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PLCs can serve as viral ‘replication hubs’, supporting the viral invasion and spread to other cell types, including astrocytes.
Although SARS-CoV-2 invasion into human CNS has been modeled in 3D brain organoids, choroid plexus (ChP) organoids, and K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, evidence suggests that most neural cells have little to no capacity for SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the other hand, the presence of any cells expressing ACE2 or other receptors may be sufficient to initiate infection28,29,33,34, motivating further work to understand the receptor expression profile and impact on infection at the human NVU in vivo. Drawing on clinical and experimental data supporting potential vascular entry and ACE2 expression in pericytes, our PCCO SARS-CoV-2 infection model presents an alternative route to infection. The PCCO model could be further improved by incorporating other NVU-component cell types, which might lend itself to other uses35. Our work provides a powerful model to study SARS-CoV-2, and may be useful to model other infectious diseases.
Methods
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Neural Crest Stem Cells Culture, and constructs
HEK293T cells (sex typed as female), Hela and H1 ESC (sex typed as male) were obtained from ATCC (CRL-11268™), ATCC (ATCCòCCL-2™) and WiCell (WAe001-A), and were not further authenticated. Generation of neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) was described previously20. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) were from CIRM (CIRM-IT1-06611). All cells were regularly mycoplasma negative. pLV-EF1a-EGFP-Puro construct was obtained from Dr. Fred Gage’s lab as a gift. Lentiviral packaging plasmids pMD2.G, pPAX2 were obtained from Addgene. pcDNA3.1-hACE2 plasmid was obtained from Dr. Tom Rogers at Scripps as a gift.
Human cortical brain organoid (CO) and pericyte containing cortical organoid (PCCO) culture
H1 and hiPSCs were maintained in mTeSR and passaged according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Cortical brain organoids were generated as previously described36,37. For PCCO generation, at CO 60 div, 2x105 GFP+ PLCs were integrated into each CO in a low attachment 96-well plate. PLC integrated COs were maintained in PCCO media for 14 days (See Supplementary Note for details).
SARS-CoV-2 infection of pericyte-like cells, COs, and PCCOs and Plaque assay
All work with SARS-CoV-2 was conducted in Biosafety Level-3 conditions at the University of California San Diego following the guidelines approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee. SARS-CoV-2 isolate USA-WA1/2020 (BEI Resources) was propagated and infectious units quantified by plaque assay using Vero E6 (ATCC) cells. See the infection details in Supplementary Note.
Detection of viral mRNA and replication using RT-qPCR
For viral RNA quantification, PLCs, COs or PCCOs were washed twice with PBS and lysed in TRIzol. RNA was extracted using the Qiagen-RNA extraction Kit. 2μg RNA was used to generate cDNA with SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). 20ng cDNA was used to perform qPCR with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix and the CDC-N1/N2/N3-SARS-CoV-2 primers mix (IDT) at a final concentration of 100nM for each primer using a Bio-Rad Real-Time PCR system. All the qPCR primers were listed in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Datasets.
Immunostaining and Light Sheet Imaging of PCCO and CO
COs and PCCOs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 72h before removal from BSL3, then embedded in 15%/15% gelatin/sucrose solution and sectioned at 20 μm. The sections were then permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100, blocked with 5% BSA and incubated with primary antibodies in 5% BSA/0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS at standard dilutions overnight at 4 °C. Next day, the sections were incubated with secondary antibodies together with DAPI and mounted with Fluoromount-G®. All the images were taken with ZEISS LSM880 Airyscan, with post-acquisition analysis done in ImageJ-6. For light sheet, PCCOs were harvested for clearing in PBST in a 1.5ml EP tube (1PCCO/tube). CUBIC 38 was used for clearing. Cleared PCCOs then embedded into 1% Agarose solution for imaging. 5X lens was used for imaging with a light sheet microscope (Zeiss Z1) according to manufacturer recommendations. The images were further developed with IMARIS (Oxford Instruments).
CO/PCCO dissociation and Single cell library preparation and sequencing
COs and PCCOs were dissociated using AccuMax, dead cells were removed by Dead Removal cocktail (Annexin V, STEMCELL Technology). Live cells were then used 10X GEM generation. 10X sc-RNA-seq-3’-V3.1 kit (10X Genomics) was used to generate the GEM, cDNA and library were generated according to the manufacturer’s instructions (10X Genomics). Libraries was sequenced using the Novaseq6000 with PE150bp for 20M reads were requested for each sample. See experimental details in Supplementary Note
CO/PCCO TMT4 quantitative Protein Mass Spectrometry
Three COs and three PCCOs were harvested into 1.5ml cold PBS, then centrifuged at 1500rpm at 4°C for 10min. After centrifugation, all PBS was removed and the CO/PCCO samples were flash frozen in liquid N2. The frozen cell pellets were analyzed by TMT4 quantitative mass spectrometry at the UCSD Proteomics Core.
Data processing of single-cell RNA-seq and Mass Spectrometry
Single cell RNA-seq sequencing were demultiplexed into Fastq files using the Cell Ranger (10x Genomics, 4.0) mkfastq function. Samples were then aligned to GRChg38-2020 10x genome reference. The count matrix was generated using the count function with default settings. SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/2020) genome and GFP-CDS were written into GRChg38-2020 human genome reference as a gene with mkref function in cell ranger 4.0. Seurat package (v.3.1.5) in RStudio (with R v. 3.5.3), used for the downstream analysis. Features expressed in less than 5 cells, cells with less than 300 unique features, or high mitochondrial content over 5% were discarded. scTransform function was used to wrap the technical variation; FindIntergrationAnchors and IntegrateData functions were used to integrate all libraries metrics into a single matrix. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) together with the PCEIbowPlot function were used to determine the inflection point. Clusters were determined using Runheatmap, FindNeighbors and Findclusters function within Seurat. Cells were considered infected if they carried the transcripts aligned to SARS-CoV-2 viral genome. Differentially expressed genes from the FindMarkers function were used to perform DAVID-GO-Term analysis over representation tests for both up-regulated and downregulated genes in each condition shown in Fig. 2r, Supplementary Dataset 1-2.
Mass Spectrometry data were generated and analyzed by the proteomic core at UCSD (Supplementary Dataset 1). Proteins with significance over 15 were used for GO-Term and string analysis in goprofile (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost) and String (https://string-db.org/) (Supplementary Dataset 1).
Reporting Summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data and material availability
The accession number for the sc-RNA-seq data reported in this paper is SRA: PRJNA668200. Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Dr. Joseph Gleeson (jogleeson@health.ucsd.edu).
Quantification and statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the GraphPad Prism 8 software. We compared viral titer by two-way ANOVA followed by a Sidak multiple-comparison test, * p<0.1. In relative mRNA expression level, cell numbers and all other statistics, n=12 includes 3 from different biological replicates and 4 technical replicates; Multiple t-test was used to determine the significance followed by a Sidak multiple-comparison test correction. **** p<0.00001, *** p<0.0001, **p<0.001, * p<0.01;
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Ronald Ellis, Jeff Esko and Dillon Chen for feedback, Sangmoon Lee for bioinformatics support, UCSD IGM for sequencing support and the UCSD Proteomic Core for mass spectrometry support. The following reagent was deposited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281. The work was supported by the Rady Children’s Hospital Neuroscience Endowment and R01NS106387 to J.G.G, Career Award for Medical Scientists from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund and K08Al130381 to A.F.C., NS103844 to E.V.S. and S.P.P., NIH Biotechnology Training Program T32 GM008349 to B.D.G. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, 1747503 to B.D.G., and the UCSD Neuroscience Microscopy Core Facility 3P30NS047101 and the UCSD Institute for Genomic Medicine Core Facility 1S10OD026929.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Lu Wang, Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
David Sievert, Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
Joseph Gleeson, Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA; Department for Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Alex E. Clark, Department of Medicine; University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
Aaron F. Carlin, Department of Medicine; University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Hannah Federman, Center for Immunity and Inflammation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers-The State University, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Benjamin D. Gastfriend, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
Eric Shusta, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Sean P. Palecek, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
References
- 1.Solomon T. Neurological infection with SARS-CoV-2 - the story so far. Nat Rev Neurol 1-2 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vogt N. Assembloids. Nat Methods 18, 27 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li H., et al. SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. Lancet 395, 1517–1520 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sarikaya B. More on Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N Engl J Med 382(2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu Y., et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun 87, 18–22 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Helms J., et al. Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N Engl J Med 382, 2268–2270 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guilmot A., et al. Immune-mediated neurological syndromes in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. J Neurol (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Perrin P., et al. Cytokine release syndrome-associated encephalopathy in patients with COVID-19. Eur J Neurol 28, 248–258 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ye M., Ren Y. & Lv T. Encephalitis as a clinical manifestation of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun 88, 945–946 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wan Y., Shang J., Graham R., Baric R.S. & Li F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J Virol 94(2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Walls A.C., et al. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281–292 e286 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.He L., et al. Pericyte-specific vascular expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 – implications for microvascular inflammation and hypercoagulopathy in COVID-19. bioRxiv, 2020.2005.2011.088500 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zlokovic B.V. Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 12, 723–738 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brann D.H., et al. Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia. Sci Adv 6(2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kantonen J., et al. Neuropathologic features of four autopsied COVID-19 patients. Brain Pathol 30, 1012–1016 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sweeney M.D., Ayyadurai S. & Zlokovic B.V. Pericytes of the neurovascular unit: key functions and signaling pathways. Nat Neurosci 19, 771–783 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Farahani R.M., Rezaei-Lotfi S., Simonian M., Xaymardan M. & Hunter N. Neural microvascular pericytes contribute to human adult neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 527, 780–796 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jia C. et al. Vitronectin from brain pericytes promotes adult forebrain neurogenesis by stimulating CNTF. Exp Neurol 312, 20–32 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crouch E.E., Liu C., Silva-Vargas V. & Doetsch F. Regional and stage-specific effects of prospectively purified vascular cells on the adult V-SVZ neural stem cell lineage. J Neurosci 35, 4528–4539 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stebbins M.J., et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived brain pericyte-like cells induce blood-brain barrier properties. Sci Adv 5, eaau7375 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lamers M.M., et al. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science 369, 50–54 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ozerdem U., Grako K.A., Dahlin-Huppe K., Monosov E. & Stallcup W.B. NG2 proteoglycan is expressed exclusively by mural cells during vascular morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 222, 218–227 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Armulik A., et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature 468, 557–561 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sloan S.A., et al. Human Astrocyte Maturation Captured in 3D Cerebral Cortical Spheroids Derived from Pluripotent Stem Cells. Neuron 95, 779–790 e776 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chavkin N.W. & Hirschi K.K. Single Cell Analysis in Vascular Biology. Front Cardiovasc Med 7, 42 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang A.C., et al. Broad transcriptional dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types with COVID-19. bioRxiv, 2020.2010.2022.349415 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vanlandewijck M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Song E. et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J Exp Med 218(2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jacob F., et al. Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cells and Brain Organoids Reveal SARS-CoV-2 Neurotropism Predominates in Choroid Plexus Epithelium. Cell Stem Cell (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liddelow S.A., et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541, 481–487 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muller U., et al. Functional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense. Science 264, 1918–1921 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Perng Y.C. & Lenschow D.J. ISG15 in antiviral immunity and beyond. Nat Rev Microbiol 16, 423–439 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ramani A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 targets neurons of 3D human brain organoids. EMBO J 39, e106230 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pellegrini L., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infects the Brain Choroid Plexus and Disrupts the Blood-CSF Barrier in Human Brain Organoids. Cell Stem Cell 27, 951–961 e955 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hall C.N., et al. Capillary pericytes regulate cerebral blood flow in health and disease. Nature 508, 55–60 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang L., et al. Loss of NARS1 impairs progenitor proliferation in cortical brain organoids and leads to microcephaly. Nat Commun 11, 4038 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kadoshima T., et al. Self-organization of axial polarity, inside-out layer pattern, and species-specific progenitor dynamics in human ES cell-derived neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 20284–20289 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Susaki E.A., et al. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nat Protoc 10, 1709–1727 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.