Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):696. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0535

Error in Results Section

PMCID: PMC7887652  PMID: 33591329

The Original Investigation titled “Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial,”1 published in the September 17, 2019, issue of JAMA, included errors in the data in the Results section. The data have been corrected in the Results section, including in the tables and figures. (All other information in the Results section was correct and is unchanged.)

Reference

  • 1.Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. ; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network . Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(11):1054-1065. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES