Skip to main content
International Journal of Spine Surgery logoLink to International Journal of Spine Surgery
. 2021 Feb 11;14(Suppl 4):S37–S45. doi: 10.14444/7163

Metastatic Paraganglioma of the Spine With SDHB Mutation: Case Report and Review of the Literature

RASHAD JABARKHEEL 1, ARJUN V PENDHARKAR 1, JONATHAN L LAVEZO 2, JUSTIN ANNES 3, KANIKSHA DESAI 3, HANNES VOGEL 2, ATMAN M DESAI 1,
PMCID: PMC7888204  PMID: 33900943

Abstract

Background

Paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors that can arise from any autonomic ganglion of the body. Most PGLs do not metastasize. Here, we present a rare case of metastatic PGL of the spine in a patient with a germline pathogenic succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) mutation.

Methods

In addition to a case report we provide a literature review of metastatic spinal PGL to highlight the importance of genetic testing and long-term surveillance of these patients.

Results

A 45-year-old woman with history of spinal nerve root PGL, 17 years prior, presented with back pain of several months' duration. Imaging revealed multilevel lytic lesions throughout the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine as well as involvement of the right mandibular condyle and clavicle. Percutaneous biopsy of the L1 spinal lesion confirmed metastatic PGL and the patient underwent posterior tumor resection and instrumented fusion of T7–T11. Postoperatively the patient was found to have a pathogenic SDHB deletion.

Conclusions

Patients with SDHx mutation, particularly SDHB, have increased risk of developing metastatic PGLs. Consequently, these individuals require long-term surveillance given the risk for developing new tumors or disease recurrence, even years to decades after primary tumor resection. Surgical management of spinal metastatic PGL involves correcting spinal instability, minimizing tumor burden, and alleviating epidural cord compression. In patients with metastatic PGL of the spine, genetic testing should be considered.

Keywords: paraganglioma, SDHB, spine metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors that can develop anywhere along the sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia of the body with an estimated prevalence of 0.2 to 1 per 100,000.1,2 When PGLs arise from chromaffin cells they frequently overproduce catecholamines. PGLs arising from adrenal chromaffin cells are commonly known as pheochromocytomas and account for 80%–85% of chromaffin cell PGLs.3 Extra-adrenal PGLs are less frequent, are primarily found along the parasympathetic ganglia of the head and neck, and are more likely to be biochemically silent.4,5 Extra-adrenal PGLs generally present between ages 40 and 50 with symptoms of mass effect specific to their location of origin.57

Most PGLs do not metastasize, with only 10%–17% ultimately being metastatic, although extra-adrenal PGLs are thought to have greater metastatic potential.8,9 Diagnosis of metastatic PGL is difficult as there are no reliable cellular or molecular markers of metastatic disease, and thus progression is necessary for diagnosis.8,10 Given the rarity of metastatic disease, there is a relative paucity of literature on metastatic extra-adrenal PGL, especially for spinal metastasis.4,1014 Here, we present a report of a patient with metastatic extra-adrenal PGL of the spine presenting 27 years after resection of primary spinal nerve root PGL who was found to have a germline succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) mutation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 45-year-old woman with history of a large (> 8 cm) spinal nerve root PGL, status postresection 27 years prior at an outside hospital, with a recurrence in the right tibia, status postresection 6 years prior also at an outside hospital, presented for care at our institution with severe thoracic back pain radiating around the rib cage for several months' duration, which was worse with movement. She endorsed feeling weak, although she was able to ambulate normally. She denied lower extremity symptoms, saddle anesthesia, and changes in urination or defecation. Physical exam was normal except for tenderness to palpation along the lower thoracic spine. She reported no overt signs of catecholamine excess such as tremors, headaches, visual symptoms, palpitations, weight loss, and diaphoresis. Preoperatively, both her blood pressure and pulse were within normal limits and she was not on any antihypertensive medications. On imaging with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, she was found to have multilevel lytic lesions throughout the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine at C1, C4–C7, L1–L3, as well as involvement of the right mandibular condyle and clavicle. She had compression fractures of the C3 and T9 vertebral bodies both with greater than 80% loss of height, and retropulsion causing moderate-to-severe spinal canal stenosis. Spinal canal extension was present at T4, T5, T9, L1, and L4, and most severe at T9, which was considered to be the symptomatic level (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preoperative T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) complete spine images showing extensive metastatic disease of the spine. (Left) Sagittal T2 MRI of the upper spine showing pathologic compression fracture of the T9 vertebral body with retropulsion of the posterior vertebral body obliterating the cerebrospinal fluid space. (Middle) Sagittal T2 MRI of the lower spine showing extensive metastatic disease throughout the lumbar spine. (Right) Axial T2 MRI at the level of the T9 vertebral body.

On the day after admission, percutaneous biopsy was performed of the L1 soft tissue lesion, and this confirmed metastatic PGL. Histologic sections of the biopsy specimen contained abundant groups of nested cells characterized by mild anisonucleosis, stippled nuclear chromatin, and abundant pale eosinophilic and slightly granular cytoplasm. Mitotic figures were seen at 7 in 10 high-power fields (Figure 2A). Immunohistochemical stains for S100, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) were performed. Tumor cells stained positive for synaptophysin (Figure 2B) and chromogranin. The S100 stain highlighted a fragmented network of sustenacular cells surrounding the neoplastic cells (Figure 2C). SDHB showed intracytoplasmic granular positivity within vascular endothelium but complete loss of staining in the tumor cells (Figure 2D), indicative of an underlying SDHx gene mutation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Histologic and immunohistochemical sections of metastatic paraganglioma biopsy specimen. (A) Hematoxylin-eosin stain of metastatic paraganglioma (×60). Histologic sections of the biopsy specimen showing an epithelioid proliferation of cells with nested architecture (“Zellballen”) with a delicate tumor vascular network between nests. The epithelioid cells show round to ovoid nuclei, minimal nuclear pleomorphism, and stippled chromatin with abundant granular amphophilic cytoplasm. Mitotic figures are seen at 7 in 10 high-power fields. (B) Immunohistochemical stain for synaptophysin showing positive granular cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells (×20). (C) Immunohistochemical stain for S-100 highlighting fragmented network of sustenacular cells surrounding tumor cells (×20). (D) Immunohistochemical stain for succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) showing absence of SDHB among tumor cells, while maintaining positive internal control within vascular endothelium (×20).

Given clinical concern for spinal instability and epidural cord compression, the patient underwent lateral extracavitary approach for partial corpectomy and laminectomy for tumor resection at T9 and posterior instrumented fusion of T7–T11. The patient tolerated the procedure well with 400 mL of blood loss and no hypertensive complications. In consultation with anesthesiology, preoperative alpha blockade was not performed.15 Grossly, the tumor appeared as fragments of red-brown soft tumor mixed with blood and trabecular bone fragments. Histologic and immunohistochemical analysis was consistent with recent biopsy. A postoperative x-ray was obtained to confirm adequate positioning of hardware (Figure 3). Patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 with a thoracic lumbosacral orthosis brace and cervical collar. Although no family history of pheochromocytoma or PGL was obtained on review, germline testing was recommended with particular concern for SDHB mutation given negative SDHB immunohistochemistry and the aggressive metastatic nature of the PGL. The patient was found to have a pathogenic SDHB deletion (c.166_170delCCTCA) which resulted in a frame shift and protein truncation (p.P56Yfs*5). Genetic testing was arranged for at-risk relatives, where several affected individuals were identified.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Postoperative sagittal x-ray of the spine showing instrumentation.

At 18 months after surgery the patient's metastatic disease is stable (Figure 4). She has received 10 sessions of radiation to the spine and 8 cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, and vincristine. Additionally, she has been receiving monthly octreotide and denosumab injections to promote disease stabilization and prevent further bone loss, respectively. Given the patient's advanced disease, additional screening beyond standard response surveillance was not pursued.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Post-operative T2 magnetic resonance imaging of thoracic spine at 1.5 years showing stable disease.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Metastatic extra-adrenal PGL to the spine is a rare phenomenon with limited case reports and 2 small case series described in the English literature (Table 1).4,10,11 Here, we present what is, to our knowledge, the fourth case report of metastatic PGL to the spine found to have a mutation of an SDH subunit, (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD) or assembly factor (SDH-AF2).4 While there are limited data available on the metastatic tendencies of extra-adrenal PGL, studies looking at both metastatic pheochromocytomas and extra-adrenal PGLs have found bone to be the most common site of metastasis followed by liver and lung.1619 The spine is the most common site of bone metastasis.16 In this case our patient had an interval of 27 years between total resection of her primary tumor and spinal metastasis. This extended interval is consistent with previous case reports as shown in Table 1.10,12,20

Table 1.

Previous reports of metastatic extra-adrenal PGL to the spine.

Authors
Country
Year
Age
Sex
Primary PGL size, cm
Primary PGL Location
Interval to Spinal Metastasis, y
Symptoms
Vertebral Level
Treatment
Follow-up, mo
Status
Genetic Testing Performed
Lau et al4 USA 2013 47 M ... Retroperitoneum 0.5 Neck pain C3 En bloc, CT 52 Dead SDHB (c.380T>G)
Jia et al10 China 2018 34 M 6.5 Retroperitoneum 24 Pain, paraparesis T2 Total, RT 27 AWD No
47 M 6.4 Upper mediastinum 37 Pain T10 Total, RT 48 AWD No
47 M 8.5 Upper mediastinum 37 Pain T3 En bloc 42 NED No
58 F 3.5 Retroperitoneum 47 Low back pain, sphincter disturbance S1 En bloc, RT 54 NED No
23 M 7.6 Retroperitoneum 22.5 Pain, hypertension, headache T2 Total, RT 12 NED No
24 M 7 Para-aortic 6 Low back pain, paraparesis T2, L3, S1 Subtotal, CT 6 Dead No
29 M 6.5 Retroperitoneum 9 Pain, weakness, numbness in right arm C2, L2–4 Subtotal, CT 35 Dead No
58 F 6 Retroperitoneum 15 Low back pain, paraparesis L4 Subtotal, CT 9 AWD No
37 M 5.5 Para-aortic 3 Pain, paraparesis T1 Total, RT 118 Dead No
25 M 4.5 Retroperitoneum 0.5 Pain, paraplegia T7 Total, RT, CT 8 Dead No
37 M 6.6 Right mediastinum 3 Pain, paraparesis T7-8 Total, RT 21 AWD No
64 M 8 Retroperitoneum 5 Neck pain, dysarthria C3-4 Total, RT 30 NED No
40 M 6 Retroperitoneum 18 Pain, paraparesis T3 En bloc 46 NED No
56 M 5.5 Retroperitoneum 12 Low back pain L2, L4, S1 Subtotal, CT 24 Dead No
35 M 6.9 Retroperitoneum 10 Low back pain S1 Total, RT 50 NED No
Kapetanakis et al11 Greece 2017 48 M ... Retroperitoneum 5 Back pain, palpitations, headache T4 RT ... ... No
Lehmen et al12 USA 2010 71 M 1.4 Carotid body 10 Neck pain, weakness C5–6 Subtotal, RT ... ... No
Kwan et al14 Australia 2009 46 M ... Para-aortic 0 Elevated blood pressure, headaches, palpitations, weakness T5 Subtotal 3 AWD SDHB mutation
Mediouni et al18 France 2014 ... ... ... ... ... Discovered on imaging Cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine ... 96 AWD SDHB
... ... ... ... ... Back pain Cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral spine ... 56 Dead SDHB
... ... ... ... ... Weakness L3 ... 303 AWD No SDHx mutation
... ... ... ... ... Discovered on imaging Cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine ... 348 AWD SDHD
... ... ... ... ... Low back pain Lumbar spine ... 1 Dead SDHB
... ... ... ... ... Bone pain Cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine ... 247 AWD No mutation
... ... ... ... ... Discovered on imaging Thoracic Spine ... 21 AWD SDHB
Narechania et al21 USA 2015 21 F 14 Retroperitoneum 0 Fever, tachycardia T9, S1–S3 RT ... ... SDHB (C.418G>T)
Bickmann et al22 Germany 2014 51 F ... Mediastinum 0 Back pain L3 ... ... ... SDHC (c.7C>T)
Feng et al23 China 2013 53 F 4.7 Bladder 19 Back pain, numbness, weakness, fever T6 Total 18 NED No
Sasaki et al24 Japan 2013 72 M ... Neck 5 Neck pain, weakness, shoulder pain C4 Subtotal, RT 3 AWD No
He et al25 China 2013 42 F 10 Retroperitoneum 0 Back pain T10, L1, L2 Total 48 NED No
Richter et al26 Germany 2011 16 F 15 Retroperitoneum 0.75 None L1 CT, subtotal, RT 120 NED No
Persu et al27 Belgium 2009 27 F ... Carotid body 13 Multiple levels, unspecified ... ... ... No SDH, VHL, RET mutations
Prabhu et al28 India 2008 29 F ... Retroperitoneum 12 Back pain L5 RT ... ... No
Yamaguchi et al29 Japan 2003 27 M ... Cardiac 0 Neck pain C2, C4, T10 RT, subtotal 20 Dead No
U-King-Im et al30 UK 2002 32 F ... Carotid body 14 Back pain, paraplegia T1–2, T9 RT 54 AWD No
Mori et al31 Japan 2001 65 M 9 Retroperitoneum 12 Abdominal pain T11 RT ... ... No
Absher et al32 USA 2000 52 M 7 Retroperitoneum 0 Chest pain, back pain T10, L1 CT, RT ... ... No
Blasius et al33 Germany 1998 16 F 14 Retroperitoneum 0 Cramp-like pain L3 Total, CT 10 NED CGH: Isochromosome 1, loss of chromosome 3, low-level gains of chromosomes. 4, 5, 6q, 9p, llq, 13q
Brodkey et al34 USA 1995 54 M ... Retroperitoneum 14 Neck pain, paresthesia, weakness C2 Total 30 NED No
32 M ... Carotid body 4 Back pain, paresthesia T7, T10–T12 Subtotal, RT 24 AWD No
Gabriel et al35 USA 1995 68 F 4 Glomus jugulare 21 Leg pain Sacrum RT ... ... No
North et al36 USA 1990 28 F 4 Carotid body 9 Neck pain C6, T9, L3 Subtotal, RT 12 AWD No
Siddiqui et al37 UAE 1988 29 M 7 Para-aortic 6 Bone pain Lumbar spine RT, CT 24 Dead No
Osborn et al38 USA 1986 47 F ... Glomus jugulare 4 Neck pain, numbness, diplopia C7 ... ... No
Kapetanakis et al39 Greece 2018 52 M ... Carotid body 3 Neck pain, weakness C2–3 Subtotal, RT ... ... No
Lv et al40 China 2016 38 F 10 Retroperitoneum 0 Lumbago, numbness, weakness L1 Subtotal, RT 96 AWD No
Jang Khan et al41 Pakistan 2016 50 M ... ... 0 Back pain, weakness T3–4 ... ... ... No
Kitagawa et al42 Japan 2015 61 M ... Retroperitoneum 12 Back pain T6 En bloc 36 AWD No

Abbreviations: AWD, alive with disease; CGH, comparative genomic hybridization; CT, chemotherapy; NED, no evidence of disease; PGL, paraganglioma; RT, radiation therapy.

Genetic testing is recommended for all patients with PGLs and their first-degree relatives.3,43 Over the past several years it has been shown that 20%–40% of patients with pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal PGL have a germline mutation in SDHx, NF1, VHL, or RET.4446 While mutations in NF1, VHL, and RET genes cause well-characterized hereditary syndromes, the association between SDHx mutations and PGLs was more recently elucidated.6,4749 SDH is a mitochondrial enzyme complex that plays a role in both the tricarboxylic acid cycle and in the electron transport chain. SDH genes function as classical tumor suppressor genes where somatic loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele is observed in tumors.6,50 While the precise pathogenic mechanism of SDH-mutation-dependent tumor formation is incompletely understood, the leading theory revolves around the role of succinate as an oncometabolite.51 Specifically, it is thought that disruption of SDH complex function, which leads to an accumulation of succinate, increases the risk of cancer because succinate accumulation competitively inhibits α-ketoglutarate dependent enzymes such as prolyl hydroxylases and histone demethylases. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylases leads to the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factors, which normally promote angiogenesis and cell survival in hypoxic conditions. Inhibition of histone demethylases causes a cell to adopt a hypermethylator phenotype that is thought to silence genes associated with neuroendocrine differentiation.5254 SDHx mutations are the most frequent hereditary cause of extra-adrenal PGLs with autosomal-dominant mutations in SDHD and SDHB being the most common.6,49 Immunohistochemical and genetic testing all PGLs for SDHx mutation, and in particular for SDHB mutation, is critically important as 30%–70% of metastatic PGLs have been found to have an SDHB germline mutation.48,55,56 Thus, while there are no definite histological markers of metastatic PGL, SDHB mutation is a strong independent predictor in addition to primary tumor size > 5 cm and extra-adrenal location.8 Interestingly, although our patient's primary tumor was reportedly > 8 cm in size and extra-adrenal in location she was not screened for SDHB mutation prior to receiving care at our institution for her spinal metastasis.

Whole-body scanning for detection of metastatic PGL is recommended at the time of primary tumor detection.3 Metastatic disease can be detected through a combination of anatomical (CT, MRI) and scintigraphic imaging techniques (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, and more recently somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with 68Ga-DOTATATE).57,58 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is currently the preferred imaging technique for detecting metastatic disease although several recent studies suggest that 68Ga-DOTATATE may have greater sensitivity particularly in the context of SDH-related disease.3,59,60 Long-term imaging follow-up in addition to annual clinical evaluation and laboratory testing is required for all patients with PGLs as approximately 50% of metastatic PGLs present metachronously and in particular for patients with SDHx mutations, who have an increased risk for metastatic disease.19 At this time no clear guidelines exist regarding the optimal frequency of imaging for PGL patients.3 In terms of laboratory testing, the Endocrine Society recommends lifelong annual testing of plasma or urine metanephrine levels to assess for recurrent or persistent disease.3

Treatment of metastatic PGL of the spine involves a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. As with other metastatic tumors of the spine the primary goals of surgery are management of spinal instability caused by lytic lesions, and decompression of the spinal cord secondary to any epidural tumor.61 Surgical resection of the primary tumor has been shown to improve overall survival in cases of synchronous metastatic PGL.62 Radiation therapy is the primary of method of local control for metastatic disease that is unresectable. Chemotherapy is reserved for widely metastatic disease with cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, and vincristine being the preferred regimen.63 Overall, metastatic PGL is difficult to treat with 5-year overall survival at approximately 60%.61

In conclusion, metastasis to the spine is a rare but important complication in patients with PGL that can lead to significant pain and disability. Genetic testing is recommended for all patients with PGLs. Patients with SDHx mutations are more likely to develop metastatic disease and SDHx mutation status is the current best predictor of metastatic PGL. SDHx mutation carriers must have frequent long-term imaging surveillance performed given the potential for metastasis several years to decades after primary resection. Neurosurgical management of metastatic PGL of the spine involves correcting spinal instability and alleviating epidural cord compression. When caring for patient with metastatic PGL of the spine, genetic testing for patients and their families should be considered.

Footnotes

Disclosures and COI: None declared. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Patient's written informed consent for publication was obtained.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Simpson LN, Hughes BD, Karikari IO, et al. Catecholamine-secreting paraganglioma of the thoracic spinal column: report of an unusual case and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(4):E1049–1052. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822e5aae. discussion E1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baysal BE. Hereditary paraganglioma targets diverse paraganglia. J Med Genet. 2002;39(9):617–622. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.9.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):1915–1942. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lau D, La Marca F, Camelo-Piragua S, Park P. Metastatic paraganglioma of the spine: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(9):1571–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Erickson D, Kudva YC, Ebersold MJ, et al. Benign paragangliomas: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in 236 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5210–5216. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.8034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Welander J, Soderkvist P, Gimm O. Genetics and clinical characteristics of hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18(6):R253–276. doi: 10.1530/ERC-11-0170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Al-Harthy M, Al-Harthy S, Al-Otieschan A, Velagapudi S, Alzahrani AS. Comparison of pheochromocytomas and abdominal and pelvic paragangliomas with head and neck paragangliomas. Endocr Pract. 2009;15(3):194–202. doi: 10.4158/EP.15.3.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Plouin PF, Fitzgerald P, Rich T, et al. Metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: focus on therapeutics. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44(5):390–399. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laird AM, Gauger PG, Doherty GM, Miller BS. Paraganglioma: not just an extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(2):247–253. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0871-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jia Q, Yin H, Yang J, et al. Treatment and outcome of metastatic paraganglioma of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(4):859–867. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5140-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kapetanakis S, Chourmouzi D, Gkasdaris G, Katsaridis V, Eleftheriadis E, Givissis P. Functional extra-adrenal paraganglioma of the retroperitoneum giving thoracolumbar spine metastases after a five-year disease-free follow-up: a rare malignant condition with challenging management. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28:94. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.94.13783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lehmen JA, Babbel DM, Mikhitarian K, Choma TJ. Paraganglioma presenting as metastatic lesion in a cervical vertebra: a case report and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(5):E152–154. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf2c96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hamilton MA, Tait D. Metastatic paraganglioma causing spinal cord compression. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(872):901–904. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.872.11026870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kwan RB, Erasmus AM, Hunn AW, et al. Pre-operative embolisation of metastatic paraganglioma of the thoracic spine. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(3):394–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Isaacs M, Lee P. Preoperative alpha-blockade in phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: is it always necessary? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017;86(3):309–314. doi: 10.1111/cen.13284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zelinka T, Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, et al. Role of positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of bone involvement in metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: specific implications for succinate dehydrogenase enzyme subunit B gene mutations. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15(1):311–323. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chrisoulidou A, Kaltsas G, Ilias I, Grossman AB. The diagnosis and management of malignant phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007;14(3):569–585. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mediouni A, Ammari S, Wassef M, et al. Malignant head/neck paragangliomas. Comparative study. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131(3):159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ayala-Ramirez M, Palmer JL, Hofmann MC, et al. Bone metastases and skeletal-related events in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1492–1497. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ayala-Ramirez M, Feng L, Johnson MM, et al. Clinical risk factors for malignancy and overall survival in patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas: primary tumor size and primary tumor location as prognostic indicators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):717–725. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Narechania S, Bath A, Ghassemi L, et al. Paraganglioma presenting as postpartum fever of unknown origin. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2015;2015:864719. doi: 10.1155/2015/864719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bickmann JK, Sollfrank S, Schad A, et al. Phenotypic variability and risk of malignancy in SDHC-linked paragangliomas: lessons from three unrelated cases with an identical germline mutation (p.Arg133*) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(3):E489–496. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feng N, Li X, Gao HD, Liu ZL, Shi LJ, Liu WZ. Urinary bladder malignant paraganglioma with vertebral metastasis: a case report with literature review. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32(11):624–628. doi: 10.5732/cjc.012.10317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sasaki K, Inose H, Kawabata S, et al. Combined surgical and radiosurgical treatment for a symptomatic cervical metastasis in a case of malignant paraganglioma: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:494. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.He J, Wang X, Zheng W, Zhao Y. Retroperitoneal paraganglioma with metastasis to the abdominal vertebra: a case report. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Richter A, Halm HF, Lerner T, Liljenqvist UR, Quante M. Long-term follow-up after en bloc resection and reconstruction of a solitary paraganglioma metastasis in the first lumbar vertebral body: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:45. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Persu A, Amyere M, Gutierrez-Roelens I, et al. Rare presentation of familial paraganglioma without evidence of mutation in the SDH, RET and VHL genes: towards further genetic heterogeneity. J Hypertens. 2009;27(1):76–82. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e328317a777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prabhu S, Jacob JJ, Thomas N, Oommen R. Visual vignette. Solitary sacral metastasis from a malignant paraganglioma. Endocr Pract. 2008;14(1):131. doi: 10.4158/EP.14.1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamaguchi S, Hida K, Nakamura N, Seki T, Iwasaki Y. Multiple vertebral metastases from malignant cardiac pheochromocytoma—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2003;43(7):352–355. doi: 10.2176/nmc.43.352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.U-King-Im JM, Carroll TA, Morris K. Vertebral metastatic chemodectoma: imaging and therapeutic octreotide. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(1 Suppl):106–109. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.97.1.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mori S, Okura T, Kitami Y, et al. A case of metastatic extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma 12 years after surgery. Hypertens Res. 2002;25(1):141–144. doi: 10.1291/hypres.25.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Absher KJ, Witte DA, Truong LD, Ramzy I, Mody DR, Ostrowski ML. Aspiration biopsy of osseous metastasis of retroperitoneal paraganglioma. Report of a case with cytologic features and differential diagnostic considerations. Acta Cytol. 2001;45(2):249–253. doi: 10.1159/000327284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Blasius S, Brinkschmidt C, Poremba C, et al. Metastatic retroperitoneal paraganglioma in a 16-year-old girl. Case report, molecular pathological and cytogenetic findings. Pathol Res Pract. 1998;194(6):439–444. doi: 10.1016/s0344-0338(98)80037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brodkey JA, Brodkey JS, Watridge CB. Metastatic paraganglioma causing spinal cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(3):367–372. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gabriel EM, Sampson JH, Dodd LG, Turner DA. Glomus jugulare tumor metastatic to the sacrum after high-dose radiation therapy: case report. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(5):1001–1005. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199511000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.North CA, Zinreich ES, Christensen WN, North RB. Multiple spinal metastases from paraganglioma. Cancer. 1990;66(10):2224–2228. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901115)66:10<2224::aid-cncr2820661031>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Siddiqui MZ, Von Eyben FE, Spanos G. High-voltage irradiation and combination chemotherapy for malignant pheochromocytoma. Cancer. 1988;62(4):686–690. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880815)62:4<686::aid-cncr2820620407>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Osborn RE, Mojtahedi S. Paraganglioma metastatic to the cervical spine. Comput Radiol. 1986;10(4):167–170. doi: 10.1016/0730-4862(86)90101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kapetanakis S, Chourmouzi D, Gkasdaris G, Katsaridis V, Eleftheriadis E, Givissis P. A rare case of spinal cord compression due to cervical spine metastases from paraganglioma of the jugular foramen-how should it be treated? J Surg Case Rep. 2018;2018(2) doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjy005. rjy005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lv G, Lu L, Dai Z. Paragangliomas of the spine. Turk Neurosurg. 2017;27(3):401–407. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.16276-15.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jang Khan NA, Ullah S, Siddiqui HU, Karim A. spinal cord compression by metastatic thoracic spine paraganglioma. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016;28(3):617–619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kitagawa R, Murakami H, Kato S, Nakada M, Demura S, Tsuchiya H. En bloc resection and reconstruction using a frozen tumor-bearing bone for metastases of the spine and cranium from retroperitoneal paraganglioma. World Neurosurg. 2016;90:698.e691–698.e695. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cavenagh T, Patel J, Nakhla N, et al. Succinate dehydrogenase mutations: paraganglioma imaging and at-risk population screening. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(3):169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Buffet A, Venisse A, Nau V, et al. A decade (2001–2010) of genetic testing for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44(5):359–366. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al. Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1459–1466. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fishbein L, Merrill S, Fraker DL, Cohen DL, Nathanson KL. Inherited mutations in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: why all patients should be offered genetic testing. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1444–1450. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2942-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287(5454):848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Neumann HP, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, et al. Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA. 2004;292(8):943–951. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.van Nederveen FH, Gaal J, Favier J, et al. An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(8):764–771. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70164-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fishbein L, Nathanson KL. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: understanding the complexities of the genetic background. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(1–2):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sajnani K, Islam F, Smith RA, Gopalan V, Lam AK. Genetic alterations in Krebs cycle and its impact on cancer pathogenesis. Biochimie. 2017;135:164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Letouze E, Martinelli C, Loriot C, et al. SDH mutations establish a hypermethylator phenotype in paraganglioma. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(6):739–752. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tretter L, Patocs A, Chinopoulos C. Succinate, an intermediate in metabolism, signal transduction, ROS, hypoxia, and tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1857(8):1086–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fliedner SM, Shankavaram U, Marzouca G, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha mutation-related paragangliomas classify as discrete pseudohypoxic subcluster. Neoplasia. 2016;18(9):567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.King KS, Prodanov T, Kantorovich V, et al. Metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma related to primary tumor development in childhood or adolescence: significant link to SDHB mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4137–4142. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.6353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Favier J, Rustin P, et al. Mutations in the SDHB gene are associated with extra-adrenal and/or malignant phaeochromocytomas. Cancer Res. 2003;63(17):5615–5621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Caumont-Prim A, Houzard C, et al. Imaging work-up for screening of paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma in SDHx mutation carriers: a multicenter prospective study from the PGL.EVA Investigators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(1):E162–173. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lepoutre-Lussey C, Caramella C, Bidault F, et al. Screening in asymptomatic SDHx mutation carriers: added value of (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT at initial diagnosis and 1-year follow-up. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(6):868–876. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3003-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Chen CC, et al. Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2262–2269. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Janssen I, Blanchet EM, Adams K, et al. Superiority of [68ga]-dotatate pet/ct to other Functional Imaging Modalities in the Localization of SDHB-associated metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(17):3888–3895. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jimenez P, Tatsui C, Jessop A, Thosani S, Jimenez C. Treatment for malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: 5 years of progress. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017;19(12):83. doi: 10.1007/s11912-017-0643-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Roman-Gonzalez A, Zhou S, Ayala-Ramirez M, et al. Impact of surgical resection of the primary tumor on overall survival in patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma or sympathetic paraganglioma. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):172–178. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fliedner SM, Lehnert H, Pacak K. Metastatic paraganglioma. Semin Oncol. 2010;37(6):627–637. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Spine Surgery are provided here courtesy of International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery

RESOURCES