Abstract
Background
Molecular biomarkers have revolutionalized diagnosis and treatment of many diseases, such as troponin use in myocardial infarction. Urgent need for high-fidelity biomarkers in neurocritical care has resulted in numerous studies reporting potential candidate biomarkers.
Methods
We performed an electronic literature search and systematic review of English language articles on cellular/molecular biomarkers associated with outcome and with disease-specific secondary complications in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and post-cardiac arrest hypoxic ischemic encephalopathic injuries (HIE).
Results
A total of 135 articles were included. Though a wide variety of potential biomarkers have been identified, only neuron-specific enolase has been validated in large cohorts and shows 100 % specificity for poor outcome prediction in HIE patients not treated with therapeutic hypothermia. There are many promising candidate blood and CSF biomarkers in SAH, AIS, ICH, and TBI, but none yet meets criteria for routine clinical use.
Conclusion
Current studies vary significantly in patient selection, biosample collection/processing, and biomarker measurement protocols, thereby limiting the generalizability of overall results. Future large prospective studies with standardized treatment, biosample collection, and biomarker measurement and validation protocols are necessary to identify high-fidelity biomarkers in neurocritical care.
Keywords: Biomarker, Traumatic brain injury, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Stroke, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Cardiac arrest, Outcome
Introduction
Cellular and molecular biomarkers play important roles in critical care—they may help monitor disease progression, probe underlying physiology, and improve prognostic accuracy. The presence of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and its injury introduce the following unique complexities in the interpretation and the use of molecular biomarkers in neurocritical care:
Biomarker origin—whether it is primarily synthesized in the central nervous system (CNS) or elsewhere.
The anatomical source of the biosample—whether it is serum, plasma, CSF, urine, or other. Molecular biomarkers have significantly different concentrations, biological half-lives, and time-course variations in different anatomical compartments.
The timing of biomarker measurement relative to disease onset—The sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers vary depending on measurement time relative to disease onset.
Association with potential injury mechanisms—Whether a molecule is part of a pathogenic pathway or a final result of cellular injury (reversible or irreversible) affects the clinical interpretation of this molecule as a biomarker of disease.
Here, we review current acute brain injury (ABI) biomarker data in light of these special considerations.
Methods
Search Criteria
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Using the PICO approach, we searched PubMed database for English language articles from January 1990 to August 2013 based on the following criteria:
Patient population Adult patients ≥18 years of age with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and post-cardiac arrest (CA) hypoxic ischemic encephalopathic injuries (HIE).
Intervention Cellular/molecular biomarkers from biological fluids such as serum, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine.
Controls Patients without ABI.
Outcome endpoints Primary outcomes of interest are mortality and long-term neurological outcome. Secondary outcomes of interest are prediction of disease-specific secondary deteriorations and complications such as hemorrhagic transformation of AIS and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and vasospasm following SAH.
Study Selection and Data Collection
We excluded unpublished data or congress presentations/abstracts, review articles, case reports or case series, studies with sample size ≤10 patients for CSF biomarkers and studies with sample size ≤30 for blood biomarkers, pediatric ICU studies, studies not conducted on ICU patients, and studies dealing with brain death. We also excluded microbiological markers of infection, biomarkers from microdialysis, and metabolites. One hundred and thirty-five studies were included. Both authors using pre-defined criteria systematically extracted data from the included studies, and the levels of evidence were classified and practical recommendations were developed according to the GRADE system. We included 28 studies for HIE following cardiac arrest (Tables 1, 2), 25 for SAH (Table 3), 25 for AIS (Table 4), 29 for ICH (Table 5), and 28 for TBI (Table 6). Available biomarkers that predict overall prognosis and secondary complications in ABI patients were reviewed to address specific endpoints.
Table 1.
Biomarkers for outcome following cardiac arrest without therapeutic hypothermia treatment
Authors/year/Ref | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecules of CNS origin | |||||
Zandbergen/2006/[1] | Post cardiac arrest, unconscious >24 h after CPR | 407 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Meynaar/2003/[3] | Post cardiac arrest, comatose post CPR | 110 | NSE | Serum |
|
Pfeifer/2005/[2] | Post cardiac arrest within 12 h of ROSC, survived >48 h | 97 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Rosen/2001/[6] | Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest | 66 | s100β, NSE | Serum |
|
Bottiger/2001/[8] | Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest | 66 | s100β | Serum |
|
Martens/1998/[4] | Post cardiac arrest, unconscious and ventilated for >24 h | 64 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Hachimi-Idrissi/2002/[9] | Post cardiac arrest | 58 | s100β | Serum |
|
Schoerkhuber/1999/[5] | Non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest | 56 | NSE | Serum |
|
Molecules of non-CNS origin | |||||
Nagao/2004/[10] | Age >17 years, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin | 401 | BNP | Blood |
|
Kasai/2011/[12] | Post cardiac arrest | 357 | Ammonia | Blood |
|
Sodeck/2007/[11] | Post cardiac arrest, comatose | 155 | BNP | Blood |
|
Shinozaki/2011/[13] | Non-traumatic out-of hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC | 98 | Ammonia, Lactate | Blood |
|
CSF biomarkers | |||||
Roine/1989/[13] | Out-of hospital VF arrest who survived >24 h | 67 | NSE, CKBB | CSF |
|
Sherman/2000/[17] | Comatose cardiac arrest patients with SSEP studies | 52 | CKBB | CSF |
|
Martens/1998/[4] | Post cardiac arrest, unconscious and ventilated for >48 h | 34 | NSE, s100β | CSF |
|
Rosen/2004/[19] | Post cardiac arrest, survive >12 days post ROSC | 22 | NFL | CSF |
|
Karkela/1993/[16] | VF or asystolic arrest | 20 | CKBB, NSE | CSF |
|
Oda/2012/[14] | Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac | 14 | HMGB1, s100β | CSF |
|
Tirschwell/1997/[18] | Post cardiac arrest with CSF CKBB CKBB measured | 351 | CSF | CSF |
|
All studies are prospective observational unless otherwise noted
NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, FPR false positive rate, OR odds ratio, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, SSEP somatosensory evoked potential, TH therapeutic hypothermia, VF ventricular fibrillation
Table 2.
Biomarkers for outcome following cardiac arrest with therapeutic hypothermia treatment
Authors/year/Ref | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tiainen/2003/[27] | RCT | Witnessed VF or VT arrest, ≤60 min between collapse to ROSC | 70 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Cronberg/2011/[29] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest with GCS <8 after ROSC | 111 | NSE | Serum |
|
Rundgren/2009/[25] | Pro | In- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, GCS ≤7 | 107 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Daubin/2011/[24] | Pro | In- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, comatose >48 h | 97 | NSE | Serum |
|
Shinozaki/2009/[23] | Pro | In- or out-of-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest with ROSC >20 min, with GCS ≤8 | 80 | NSE, s100μ | Serum |
|
Stammet/2013/[28] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest | 75 | NSE, s100μ | Serum |
|
Rossetti/2012/[21] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest, comatose | 61 | NSE | Serum |
|
Mortberg/2011/[30] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest, SBP >80 mmHg x > 5 min, GCS ≤7, <6 h following ROSC | 31 | NSE, s100β, BDNF, GFAP | Serum |
|
PPV positive predictive value, Pro prospective observational, RCT randomized controlled trial, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, TH therapeutic hypothermia, VF ventricular fibrillation, VT ventricular tachycardia
Table 3.
Biomarkers for subarachnoid hemorrhage
Author/year/Ref | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecules of CNS origin | ||||||
Weismann/1997/[31] | Pro | Aneurysmal SAH within 3 days of ictus | 70 | s100β | Serum |
|
Stranjalis/2007/[32] | Pro | Spontaneous SAH within 48 h of ictus | 52 | s100β | Serum |
|
Oertel/2006/[33] | Pro | Aneurysmal SAH | 51 | s100β, NSE | Serum |
|
Coplin/1999/[34] | Pro | Aneurysmal SAH | 27 | CKBB | CSF |
|
Inflammatory markers | ||||||
Pan/2013/[65] | Pro | Aneurysmal SAH | 262 SAH, 150 CTRL | pGSN | Blood |
|
Frijns/2006/[48] | Pro | SAH within 72 h of ictus, exclude perimesencephalic SAH | 106 | vWF | Serum |
|
Mack/2002/[47] | Pro | SAH, excluding those with pro-inflammatory disease process | 80 | sICAM-1 | Serum |
|
Beeftink/2011/[46] | Pro | Aneurysmal SAH | 67 | TNFα, Leukocytes, CRP | Serum |
|
Chou/2011/[38] | Pro | Spontaneous SAH, within 96 h of ictus | 55 | MMP-9 | CSF |
|
Chou/2011/[38] | Pro | Spontaneous SAH, within 96 h of ictus | 55 | Neutrophil, WBC | Blood |
|
Chou/2012/[50] | Pro | Spontaneous SAH, within 96 h of ictus | 52 | TNFα, IL-6 | Serum |
|
Chou/2011/[64] | Pro | Spontaneous SAH, within 96 h of ictus | 42 | pGSN | CSF, Serum |
|
Fassbender/2001/[52] | Pro | Aneurysmal SAH within 48 h of ictus | 35 | IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα | CSF, Serum |
|
Mathiesen/1997/[53] | Pro | SAH patients with EVD | 22 | IL-1Rα, TNFα | CSF |
|
Weir/1989/[43] | Retro | Aneurysmal SAH with vital signs and CBC data (76 % missing data) | 173 | WBC | Blood |
|
Niikawa/1997/[39] | Retro | Fisher grade 3 SAH treated with aneurysm clipping within 24 h of ictus | 103 | WBC | Blood |
|
Other biomarkers | ||||||
Niskakangas/2001/[79] | Case control | Aneurysmal SAH | 108 | ApoE4 | Blood |
|
Juvela/2009/[76] | Case control | SAH within 48 h of ictus | 105 | ε2, ε4–containing genotypes | Blood |
|
Lanterna/2005/[78] | Case control | SAH HH grade 1–3 | 101 | ApoE4 genotype | Blood |
|
Leung/2002/[77] | Case control | Spontaneous SAH | 72 | ApoE4 genotype | Blood |
|
Kay/2003/[81] | Case Control | Spontaneous SAH requiring EVD | 19 | s100β, ApoE | CSF |
|
Lanterna/2005/[78] | Meta-analysis | Consecutive SAH, with 3-month follow-up data | 696 | ApoE4 genotype | Blood |
|
Moussouttas/2012/[88] | Pro | SAH with EVD, HH grade 3–5, endovascular aneurysm treatment | 102 | Epinephrine | CSF |
|
Yarlagadda/2006/[84] | Pro | Spontaneous SAH, >21 years | 300 | BNP, cTI | Serum |
|
Naidech/2005/[82] | Pro | Spontaneous non-traumatic SAH | 253 | cTI | Serum |
|
Ramappa/2008/[83] | Retro | SAH diagnosed by CT scan or CSF, SAH ICD-9 code, with cTI measured | 83 | cTI | Blood |
|
Pro prospective observational, Retro retrospective, CTRL control subjects, CBC complete blood count, HH grade hunt and hess grade, WFNS World Federation of Neurosurgeons Classification, DIND delayed ischemic neurological deficit, DCI delayed cerebral ischemia, mRS modified Rankins score, OR odds ratio
Table 4.
Biomarkers for acute ischemic stroke
Authors/year/Ref | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecules of CNS origin | ||||||
Kazmierski/2012/[123] | Pro | AIS | 458 | s100β, OCLN, CLDN5, ZO1 | Serum |
|
Foerch/2004/[93] | Pro | AIS within 6 h of onset with proximal MCA occlusion | 51 | s100β | Serum |
|
Missler/1997/[89] | Pro | AIS diagnosed by CT | 44 | s100β, NSE | Serum |
|
Foerch/2005/[91] | Pro | AIS within 6 h of onset | 39 | s100β | Serum |
|
Herrmann/2000/[90] | Pro | Anterior circulation AIS | 32 | s100β, GFAP | Serum |
|
Foerch/2003/[92] | Pro | AIS ≤5 h of onset with Ml occlusion | 23 | s100β | Serum |
|
Biomarkers of inflammation and blood brain barrier | ||||||
Den Hertog/2009/[100] | RCT | AIS ≤12 h onset, no liver disease, prior mRS <2 | 561 | CRP | Serum |
|
Idicula/2009/[101] | Nested Pro | AIS ≤24 h onset | 498 | CRP | Serum |
|
Montaner/2006/[99] | Pro | AIS in MCA territory treated with IV tPA within 3 h; exclude inflammatory disease or infection | 143 | CRP | Serum |
|
Winbeck/2002/[102] | Pro | AIS ≤12 h onset, NOT treated with IV tPA | 127 | CRP | Serum |
|
Topakian/2008/[103] | Pro | AIS in MCA territory treated with IV tPA ≤6 h of onset, exclude CRP >6 mg/dL | 111 | CRP | Serum |
|
Shantikumar/2009/[98] | Pro | AIS surviving >30 days | 394 | CRP | Serum |
|
Elkind/2006/[96] | Retro | Age >40, reside in northern Manhattan >3 months | 467 | hs-CRP | Serum |
|
Huang/2012/[97] | Retro | Age >40, reside in northern Manhattan >3 months | 741 | hs-CRP | Serum |
|
Castellanos/2003/[116] | Pro | Hemispheric AIS within 7.8 ± 4.5 h of onset | 250 | MMP-9 | Plasma | MMP-9 ≥140 μg/L predicted hemorrhagic transformation (61 % PPV; 97 % NPV) |
Castellanos/2007/[113] | Pro | AIS ≤3 h treated with IV tPA | 134 | c-Fn, MMP-9 | Serum |
|
Moldes/2008/[119] | Pro | AIS treated with IV tPA | 134 | ET-1, MMP-9, c-Fn | Serum |
|
Serena/2005/[118] | Case control | Malignant MCA infarction, <70 years | 40 AIS, 35 CTRL | c-Fn, MMP-9 | Plasma |
|
Montaner/2003/[114] | Pro | AIS in MCA territory treated with IV tPA within 3 h | 41 | MMP-9 | Plasma |
|
Montaner/2001/[115] | Pro | Cardioembolic AIS in MCA territory | 39 | MMP-9 | Plasma |
|
Castellanos/2004/[93] | Pro | AIS treated with IV tPA by ECASS II criteria | 87 | c-Fn | Plasma |
|
Guo/2011/[57] | Pro | First onset AIS | 172 AIS, 50 CTRL | pGSN | Plasma |
|
Yin/2013/[106] | Pro | AIS | 186 AIS, 100 CTRL | Visfastin | Plasma |
|
Other biomarkers | ||||||
Haapaniemi/2000/[122] | Case control | AIS | 101 AIS, 101 CTRL | ET-1 | Plasma |
|
Lampl/1997/[126] | Pro | AIS within 18 h from onset | 26 | ET-1 | CSF, Plasma |
|
Chiquete/2013/[124] | Pro | AIS | 463 | Uric acid | Serum |
|
Matsumoto/2013/[125] | Retro | AIS from non-valvular AF within 48 h of onset | 124 | d-dimer | Plasma |
|
AF atrial fibrillation, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, Pro prospective observational, RCT randomized controlled trial, Retro retrospective, CTRL control subjects, NIHSS NIH stroke scale, OR odds ratio
Table 5.
Biomarkers for intracerebral hemorrhage
Authors/year/Ref | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecules of CNS origin | ||||||
Hu/2012/[132] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH within 6 h of onset | 176 | Tau | Serum |
|
Hu/2010/[127] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH | 86 ICH, 30 CTRL | s100β | Plasma |
|
Delgado/2006/[126] | Pro | ICH | 78 | s100β | Blood |
|
Brea/2009/[129] | Pro | ICH and AIS | 44 ICH, 224 AIS | NSE | Blood |
|
James/2009/[128] | Pro | ICH | 28 | s100β, BNP | Blood |
|
Cai/2013/[133] | Case control | Basal ganglia ICH | 112 ICH, 112 CTRL | pNF-H | Plasma |
|
Biomarkers of inflammation | ||||||
Leira/2004/[137] | Pro | ICH within 12 h of onset | 266 | Neutrophils, fibrinogen | Blood |
|
Di Napoli/2011/[135] | Pro | ICH | 210 | WBC, CRP, Glucose | Blood |
|
Agnihotri/2011/[136] | Retro | Spontaneous ICH | 423 | WBC | Blood |
|
Zhao/2013/[149] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH within 6 h of onset | 132 ICH, 68 CTRL | pGSN | Plasma |
|
Castillo/2002/[134] | Pro | ICH within 24 h of onset | 124 | Glutamate, TNFα | Blood |
|
Wang/2011/[139] | Pro Posthoc analysis | ICH within 24 h of onset | 60 | sICAM-1, sE-selectin | Plasma |
|
Li/2013/[148] | Pro | ICH within 24 h of onset | 59 | MMP-3, MMP-9 | Plasma |
|
Hernandez-Guillamon/2012/[140] | Pro | ICH within 48 h of onset | 66 ICH, 58 CTRL | VAP-1/SSAO | Plasma |
|
Fang/2005/[141] | Pro | ICH | 43 | IL-11 | Plasma |
|
Diedler/2009/[138] | Retro | Supratentorial ICH | 113 | CRP | Blood |
|
Gu/2013/[142] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH within 6 h of onset | 85 ICH, 85 CTRL | Visfatin | Plasma |
|
Huang/2013/[143] | Case control | Basal ganglia ICH | 128 ICH, 128 CTRL | Visfatin | Plasma |
|
Zhang/2013/[144] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH | 92 ICH, 50 CTRL | Leptin | Plasma |
|
Other biomarkers | ||||||
Chiu/2012/[150] | Pro | ICH within 24 h of onset, >16 years old | 170 | d-dimer | Serum |
|
Delgado/2006/[126] | Pro | ICH | 98 | d-dimer | Plasma |
|
Rodriguez-Luna/2011/[151] | Pro | Supratentorial ICH within 6 h of onset | 108 | LDL-C | Serum |
|
Ramirez-Moreno/2009/[152] | Pro | ICH within 12 h of onset | 88 | LDL-C | Serum |
|
Hays/2006/[153] | Retro | ICH | 235 | cTn1 | Blood |
|
Chen/2011/[158] | Pro | ICH | 64 ICH, 114 CTRL | Oxidative markers | Blood |
|
Wang/2012/[155] | Pro | ICH within 24 h of onset | 60 ICH, 60 CTRL | Nuclear DNA | Plasma |
|
Huang/2009/[154] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH | 36 ICH, 10 CTRL | Microparticles | Plasma, CSF |
|
Zheng/2012/[156] | Case control | ICH | 79 | miRNAs | Blood |
|
Zhang/2012/[157] | Pro | Basal ganglia ICH | 89 ICH, 50 CTRL | Copeptin | Plasma |
|
Pro prospective observational, RCT randomized controlled trial, Retro retrospective, CTRL control subjects, OR odds ratio
Table 6.
Biomarkers for traumatic brain Injury
Authors/year | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecules of CNS origin | ||||||
Okonkwo/2013/[180] | Pro | Mild, moderate & severe TBI | 215 | GFAP-BDP | Blood |
|
Metting/2012/[170] | Pro | Mild TBI | 94 | s100β. GFAP | Blood |
|
Vos/2010/[178] | Pro | Moderate & severe TBI | 79 | s100β, GFAP | Blood |
|
Vos/2004/[172] | Pro | Severe TBI | 85 | s100β, NSE, GFAP | Blood |
|
Wiesmann/2009/[167] | Pro | Mild, moderate, & severe TBI | 60 | s100β, GFAP | Blood |
|
Pelinka/2004/[168] | Pro | TBI within 12 h | 92 | s100β, GFAP | Blood |
|
Nylen/2008/[167] | Pro | Severe TBI | 59 | s100β, s100a1b, s100βb | Blood |
|
Nylen/2006/[179] | Pro | Severe TBI | 59 | GFAP | Blood |
|
Olivecrona/2009/[171] | Pro | Severe TBI | 48 | s100β, NSE | Blood |
|
Topolovec-Vranic/2011/[175] | Pro | Mild TBI within 4 h | 141 | s100β, NSE | Blood |
|
Rainey/2009/[165] | Pro | Severe TBI within 24 h | 100 | s100β | Blood |
|
Thelin/2013/[166] | Retro | Severe TBI | 265 | s100β | Blood |
|
Rodriguez-Rodriguez/2012/[159] | Pro | Severe TBI | 55 | s100β | Blood urine |
|
Kay/2003/[81] | Case control | TBI with GCS < 8 | 27 TBI, 28 CTRL | ApoE, s100β | CSF |
|
Mondello/2012/[183] | Case control | severe TBI | 95 | UCH-L1 | Blood, CSF |
|
Brophy/2011/[184] | Pro | Severe TBI GCS ≤8 | 86 (blood), 59 (CSF) | UCH-L1 | Blood, CSF |
|
Papa/2009/[181] | Pro | TBI GCS ≤8 with EVD | 41 TBI, 25 CTRL | UCH-L1 | CSF |
|
Papa/2012/[185] | Pro | Mild & moderate TBI GCS 9–15 | 96 TBI, 199 CTRL | UCH-L1 | Blood |
|
Liliang/2010/[177] | Pro | severe TBI | 34 | Tau | Blood |
|
Pineda/2007/[186] | Pro | Severe TBI | 41 | SBDP145, SBDP150 | CSF |
|
Brophy/2009/[187] | Case control | Severe TBI | 38 | SBDP145, SBDP150 | CSF |
|
Mondello/2010/[188] | Pro | Severe TBI | 40 TBI, 24 CTRL | SBDP145, SBDP120 | CSF |
|
Inflammatory markers | ||||||
Schneider Soares/2012/[195] | Pro | mild, moderate, & severe TBI | 127 | IL-10, TNFα | Blood |
|
Stein/2012/[194] | Pro | severe TBI | 68 | IL-8, TNFα | Serum |
|
Tasci/2003/[196] | Pro | mild, moderate, & severe TBI | 48 | IL-1 | Blood |
|
Antunes/2010/[197] | Pro | TBI with hemorrhagic contusions | 30 | IL-6 | Blood |
|
Combinations of markers | ||||||
Diaz-Arrastia/2013/[189] | Pro | mild, moderate, & severe TBI | 206 | UCH-L1, GFAP | Blood |
|
Czeiter/2012/[190] | Pro | severe TBI | 45 | GFAP, UCH-L1, SBDP145 | Serum, CSF |
|
Pro prospective, PPV positive predictive value, Retro retrospective, CTRL control subjects, GOS Glasgow outcome scale, OR odds ratio, PPV positive predictive value
Review End-Points
(a) Are there cellular/molecular biomarkers that help predict long-term neurological prognosis in comatose cardiac arrest patients either treated or not treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH)?
Are there cellular/molecular biomarkers that help predict (a) long-term outcome and (b) development of vasospasm and/or DCI after SAH?
Are there cellular/molecular biomarkers that help predict (a) long-term outcome and (b) incidence of malignant cerebral edema or hemorrhagic transformation following AIS?
Are there cellular/molecular biomarkers that help predict (a) long-term outcome and (b) hematoma expansion and cerebral edema following ICH?
Are there cellular/molecular biomarkers that help predict (a) long-term outcome and (b) cerebral edema and intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation after TBI?
Literature Summary
Cardiac Arrest HIE: Without TH
We found 20 prospective observational studies specific to these patients (Table 1). Outcome measures examined include regaining consciousness and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at 3 or 6 months after cardiac arrest.
Molecules of CNS Origin
The most extensively studied biomarkers in this population are s100β and neuron-specific enolase (NSE); both primarily originate from the central nervous system (CNS). The largest prospective study (n = 407) found serum NSE >33 μg/L at 24, 48, or 72 h after CA had 0 % false positive rate (FPR) for poor outcome (death or persistent unconsciousness) at 1 month [1]. Serum NSE >33 μg/L at 24–72 h post CA predicts death or persisting unconsciousness after 1 month with 100 % specificity in these patients. Several other studies with sample sizes between 56 and 110 supported serum NSE as a prognostic biomarker for HIE though optimal NSE cutoff values differed (20–65 μg/L) [2–6]. Additional confounds arise from the poor reproducibility of NSE assays used [7]. Studies with serial biomarker measurements over time found that serum NSE increased over the first 72 h following CA, reaching maximal between-group difference at 24–72 h, while serum s100β had maximal between-group difference immediately after CA and then levels decreased over time [2, 4, 8]. Though elevated serum s100β also predicts poor outcome [4, 6, 8, 9], it never achieved 100 % specificity in any study and appears to be inferior to somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and serum NSE to predict CA outcome [1].
Molecules of Non-CNS Origin
Four prospective studies examined biomarkers from the first blood sample taken upon hospital arrival in CA patients, and found that elevated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), ammonia, and lactate are associated with in-hospital mortality [10] and with poor 6-month outcome in comatose survivors [11–13]. These biomarkers lack replication and well-defined cutoff values.
CSF Biomarkers
There are few prospective studies on CSF biomarkers in CA; the largest sample size has 67 subjects. These studies suggest that elevation of CSF s100β [4, 14], NSE [15], creatinine kinase brain isoenzyme (CKBB) [15–18], and neurofilament (NFL) [19] are associated with non-awakening and poor outcome following CA. There was no standardized timing of CSF collection in these studies, and sampling time in these studies ranged from 4 h to 30 days post CA.
Cardiac Arrest HIE: With TH (Table 2)
Many of the clinical, electrophysiological, and molecular predictors of poor outcome following CA have decreased accuracy in patients treated with TH [20–22]. Several studies that either in part [23–25] or entirely [20, 26–28] examined TH-treated cardiac arrest patients showed that TH is associated with lower serum NSE levels and that it no longer predicts poor outcome after CA with 100 % specificity after TH [27]. Eight prospective observational studies examined this patient population. The largest studies consisted of 97–111 subjects and found that all patients with NSE >28–97 μg/L at 48 h post CA had poor outcome [24, 25, 29] and had MRI evidence of extensive brain injury [29]. Several other studies supported that higher serum s100β and NSE are associated with poor outcome, but none found 100 % specificity [23, 27, 28]. The latest prospective cohort study (n = 66) showed that 5 out of 28 CA survivors had NSE >33 μg/L at 24–48 h post CA, including 3 subjects who survived with good outcome (CPC 1–3) [21]. This study raised caution that NSE >33 μg/L does not have 100 % specificity for poor outcome after cardiac arrest in the era of TH.
s100β may have better predictive value than NSE for poor outcome in this patient population, but studies reported a wide range of optimal cutoff values for this biomarker [23, 28, 30]. Biomarker combinations such as s100β plus NSE [26] or molecular biomarkers plus physiological markers [28] may improve prediction precision for outcome after cardiac arrest following TH, but all require further validation.
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (Table 3)
Molecules of CNS Origin
Several prospective studies found that serum s100β is elevated in SAH compared to healthy controls [31] and that elevated blood s100β is associated with initial neurologic severity and long-term outcome [31–33]. However, studies to date are relatively small and have wide standard deviation in s100β levels. Furthermore, external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion in SAH is associated with decreased blood s100β [32], which is an important confounding factor. One study suggested that lower serum s100β is associated with vasospasm while higher serum s100β is associated with mortality [33], which introduces contradicting associations between s100β and SAH. Elevation of CSF CKBB, a marker of astrocytic cell death, has been linked to poor short-term SAH outcome [34].
Biomarkers of Inflammation
Inflammation may play a role in secondary brain injury and outcome after SAH [35, 36]. Several prospective cohort studies have found that blood leukocyte elevations are associated with vasospasm [37–39] and poor SAH outcome [37–45], though there are reports to the contrary [46]. Elevation of blood CRP and adhesion molecules, e.g., soluble ICAM-1, are associated with DCI [47] and poor outcome in SAH [48], but other moderately sized studies report the contrary [48]. Elevation of serum von Willebrand factor (vWf), a marker of endothelial cell activation, is associated with DCI [48, 49] and worse outcome after SAH [48], but these results have yet to be validated.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in DCI and brain injury after SAH. Human studies found that elevated serum TNFα [50] is associated with poor outcome and elevated blood soluble endoglin (sEng), blood transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), and elevated CSF TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1Ra are associated with vasospasm [51–54]. However, some studies report contrary results with blood TNFα [46, 52] and IL-6 [50]. Studies examining CSF cytokine profiles in SAH are all small. While all studies suggest elevated CSF proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1Rα, and IL-6 and soluble TNFα receptor I (sTNFR-1) which are associated with initial SAH clinical severity, there are conflicting reports on the associations between CSF cytokines and SAH outcome [52, 53, 55]. An important consideration is that intracranial hypertension causes CSF IL-6 elevation [56], and this may confound studies of CSF IL-6 levels in SAH and other conditions associated with increased ICP.
Metalloproteinases (MMPs) can disrupt neuron-extracellular matrix interaction leading to brain injury [57, 58], and elevated blood and CSF MMP-9 levels have been linked with vasospasm [59] and poor SAH outcome [38]. MMPs can cleave plasma-type gelsolin (pGSN) [60], which is thought to mitigate pro-inflammatory effects of cytokines [61, 62] and may be neuroprotective [63]. SAH is associated with decrease pGSN in blood and CSF; decreased blood pGSN may be associated with poor outcome [64, 65], and novel pGSN breakdown fragments have been identified in SAH CSF [64].
Vasoactive Biomarkers
Activity of endopeptidases such as MMPs [66, 67] produce Endothelin-1 (ET-1), the strongest vasoconstrictor in the CNS. ET-1 is implicated in the pathogenesis of vasospasm [68, 69]. Several human studies link elevated CSF ET-1 levels with vasospasm [70–72], though other studies do not [73, 74]. A randomized clinical trial showed that ET-1A antagonist reduced the incidence of angiographic vasospasm but not DCI or poor outcome in SAH [75], raising new questions about the role of ET-1 in SAH.
Other Biomarkers
ApoE genotype is associated with outcome after brain injury. Several moderately sized studies found conflicting associations between ApoE4 genotype and SAH outcome [76–79]. A meta-analysis of eight studies (n = 696) found ApoE4 is associated with worse SAH outcome [80]. One small study found decreased CSF ApoE protein is associated with higher SAH severity and less favorable outcome [81].
SAH is associated with cardiac dysfunction. Epidemiologic studies describe a positive association between elevated cardiac troponin-I (cTI) and initial SAH clinical severity as well as death or severe disability at discharge [82, 83], though one large study did not support this conclusion [84]. Elevation of another cardiac-derived peptide, BNP, has been linked to hyponatremia [85, 86], DCI [87], and mortality after SAH [84]. It is not known whether the association between cTI and BNP and SAH outcome reflect the effect of cardiac injury on SAH outcome. CSF epinephrine elevation in the first 48 h of SAH has also been independently linked to higher SAH mortality and disability [88].
Acute Ischemic Stroke (Table 4)
Advances in AIS therapies have created the need for fast and accurate biomarkers that can reflect extent of real-time brain tissue injury to guide revascularization therapy and to predict the risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation—a “brain troponin”.
Molecules of CNS Origin
Small (n < 50) prospective studies found that blood s100β, NSE [89], and GFAP [90]—all correlate positively with total infarct volume and outcome after AIS [89, 90], but these biomarkers did not add to the prognostic accuracy of existing clinical predictors. The strongest AIS biomarker studies to date studied patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory infarcts and found that blood s100β at 48–96 h after AIS had the highest predictive value for functional outcome and for total infarct volume [91], and that low serum s100β was associated with early MCA recanalization [92]. Elevated s100β is also associated with the malignant cerebral edema after AIS [93, 94].
Biomarkers of Inflammation and BBB Injury
C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase response protein which may itself have pro-inflammatory effects and increase secondary brain injury [95]. Elevated serum CRP in acute and subacute phases (0–15 days) of AIS is independently associated with mortality or stroke recurrence in large cohort studies [96–98]. One large (n > 100) study found that hyperacute serum CRP elevation was associated with death after IV thrombolysis, regardless of vessel recanalization, and that serum CRP correlated with 3-month modified Rankin scores (mRS) in a dose-dependent fashion [99]. Several other studies [100–102], but not all [103] supported the correlation of hyperacute serum CRP and AIS mortality. The cutoff values for CRP in these studies vary widely. Measurement imprecision and confounding by infection and non-specific inflammation are important limitations in its utility as an AIS biomarker. General leukocyte elevations [104, 105] and elevation of visfatin, a pro-inflammatory factor, [106] also are associated with poor AIS outcome.
Leukocytes are a major source of MMP release following ABI [107]. MMPs are implicated in numerous pathogenic mechanisms in AIS including BBB disruption [108, 109], progression of cerebral edema, and worsening of cerebral ischemic injury [110]. In AIS, higher baseline blood MMP-9 levels are associated with thrombolysis failure [111] and with increased risk of parenchymal hematoma either with [112–114] or without IV tPA [115, 116]. Higher MMP-9 mRNA level is associated with poor outcome and mortality after AIS [117]. Elevated serum MMP-9, c-fibronectin (cFn), and ET-1 have been associated with malignant cerebral edema after AIS [118, 119], though the data on MMP-9 is inconsistent [119]. The association of blood c-Fn and malignant cerebral edema after AIS is consistent across two moderately sized studies [118, 119]. Plasma c-Fn level also is associated with hemorrhagic transformation in tPA-treated AIS cohort. Pre-tPA blood MMP-9 ≥140 ng/mL with c-Fn ≥3.6 μg/mL predicts hemorrhagic transformation with 87 % specificity and PPV of 41 % [94].
Several studies have found contradictory results regarding whether ET-1 levels, in plasma or CSF, are elevated after AIS [120, 121]. The largest study to date found no association between plasma ET-1 levels and AIS or its outcome [122]. Other potential biomarkers of BBB injury include tight junction proteins such as occludin (OCLN), claudin 5 (CLDN5), and zonula occudens 1 (ZO1). Elevated plasma levels of these proteins are associated with hemorrhagic transformation of AIS [123].
Other Biomarkers
A large prospective registry found that low serum uric acid level in the first 7 days of AIS is independently associated with good short-term outcome [124]. Admission level of serum d-dimer has also been linked with total infarct volume and outcome at hospital discharge in AIS from atrial fibrillation [125].
Intracerebral Hemorrhage (Table 5)
Molecules of CNS Origin
Four prospective observational studies (total of 236 subjects) examined s100β in ICH. Three of the four studies found that elevated serum s100β is associated with early deterioration and poor ICH outcome at hospital discharge [126–128]. One found that serum NSE level was associated with poor 3-month ICH outcome while s100β was not [129]. In these studies, serum s100β levels were found to correlate with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), ICH volume, and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Elevated serum myelin basic protein (MBP) has been reported in TBI and ICH [130, 131]. Elevated serum tau protein [132], phosphorylated axonal neurofilament subunit H (pNF-H) [133], and blood glutamate [134] were also found to predict poor outcome in ICH. However, it is unclear whether the addition any of the above biomarkers improved predictive value of known clinical predictors of ICH outcome [126, 128, 133].
Biomarkers of Inflammation
Elevated leukocyte or neutrophil count [135–137], CRP [135, 138], and adhesion molecules such as soluble ICAM-1, soluble E-selectin [139], and vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) [140] have been associated with increased ICH mortality and worse ICH outcome. Elevated cytokines such as TNFα and IL-11 have also been associated with perihematoma edema and ICH mortality [134, 141]. Blood adipokines such as visfatin and leptin are found to be elevated in basal ganglia ICH and are associated with hematoma expansion, early neurological deterioration, and poor long-term outcome [142–144]. Plasma MMP-9 levels have been associated with ICH peri-hematoma edema [145, 146] and ICH enlargement [148], while MMP-3 is associated with poor ICH outcome [146, 148]. Decreased anti-inflammatory marker pGSN has also been associated with poor ICH outcome and mortality [149].
Other Markers
Molecules from the coagulation cascade such as d-dimer [126, 150] and fibrinogen [137] have been associated with increased mortality and early deterioration after ICH. Decreased serum LDL-C levels also correlate with hematoma expansion, ICH volume, and ICH mortality [151, 152]. Elevated cTn-I has been associated with increased in-hospital ICH mortality [153]. Emerging data suggest some novel biomarkers such as blood and CSF microparticles [154], blood nuclear DNA [155], blood microRNA expression patterns [156], plasma copeptin [157], and oxidative marker blood leukocyte 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) [158] may be associated with ICH volume, ICH expansion, mortality, and outcome.
Of the above candidate biomarkers of ICH outcome and secondary deterioration, none have been validated or proven to improve the predictive performance of existing clinical predictors of ICH outcome.
Traumatic Brain Injury (Table 6)
Molecules of CNS Origin
Elevated blood and urine levels [159] of s100β and its isoforms s100A1B and s100BB are associated with poor outcome in TBI [160–169], though this may not hold true in the case of mild TBI [170] or severe TBI patients treated with ICP-targeted therapy [171]. In a study of 265 patients, blood s100β levels drawn between 12 and 36 h after injury were associated with neurological outcome. The area under curve (AUC) of s100β levels during the first 48 h after injury had the strongest relationship to neurological outcome [166]. Elevated blood NSE levels have been linked to poor outcome in severe [172–174] as well as mild TBI [175], though results have been inconsistent [163, 171, 176]. Elevations in serum and CSF MBP, CKBB [131], and tau protein [177] were also found in TBI.
Several studies found elevated blood GFAP levels to predict TBI outcome [167, 168, 172, 178, 179], including mild TBI [170]. GFAP is not elevated in polytrauma without TBI and therefore may have more CNS-specificity compared to s100β or NSE. Limitations in the utility of GFAP as a biomarker include high variability in reported blood GFAP levels after TBI and the rapid decline of blood GFAP levels after TBI requiring measurements within the first hours of TBI [167]. GFAP breakdown products (GFAP-BDP) are emerging as a potential TBI biomarker. In a study of 215 patients with mild to severe TBI, GFAP-BDP >0.68 μg/L within 24 h of injury was associated with acute traumatic lesions on the CT and with unfavorable 6-month outcome [180].
Two highly neuron-specific protein biomarkers, ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and alpha-II spectrin breakdown products (SBDP), are emerging as promising candidate TBI biomarkers. UCH-L1 is involved in the ubiquitination of abnormal proteins for proteasome degradation and is present in almost all neurons. UCH-L1 elevation is detected soon after TBI in both CSF and serum [181], and elevated UCH-L1 levels are associated with lower GCS and poor outcome after TBI [181–185]. Alpha-II spectrin is a protein primarily expressed in neurons but not in glia and is most concentrated in axons. It is broken down by the calpain and caspase-3 cysteine proteases, and its breakdown products SBDP120, SBDP145, and SBDP150 in the CSF of TBI patients are associated with worse GCS, longer ICP elevation, and poor outcome following TBI [186–188]. The high neuronal specificity and early detection of these markers make them promising future candidate biomarkers for TBI.
Combinations of biomarkers may have better prognostic value than individual biomarkers. In a study of 206 subjects, GFAP and UCH-L1 together had better sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between TBI patients and healthy controls than either biomarker alone. The combination also had better sensitivity and specificity for predicting 3-month outcome [189]. Other combinations of biomarkers found to have prognostic value for TBI outcome include GFAP, UCH-L1, and SBDP145 [190], and NSE and s100β [191].
Biomarkers of Inflammation
Leukocyte elevation is associated with poor outcome after TBI [192, 193]. Elevation of blood cytokines TNFα and IL-8 levels are associated with impending intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion in TBI [194], while elevation of IL-10 is independently linked to TBI mortality [195]. Other proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-6 have been linked with initial injury severity and with deterioration following TBI [196, 197], though there are conflicting reports for IL-1 [198]. Decreased levels of pGSN also are linked with mortality and worse outcome in TBI [199, 200].
Though numerous candidate biomarkers have a positive association to TBI outcome, it is not clear that they add significant prognostic value to existing clinical predictors. The heterogeneity of TBI pathophysiology will require large numbers of patients to confirm the clinical usefulness of any of these biomarkers. Combining biomarkers into a panel may provide more information than individual biomarkers.
Limitations
Studies to date have identified numerous candidate molecular biomarkers for prognostication and prediction of secondary complications in ABI, but few have been validated in large cohorts and none have translated into routine clinical use in neurocritical care. Major barriers to validate existing biomarkers include high biological and treatment heterogeneity and the lack of standardization in phenotype definition and in methods of sample collection, processing, storage, and biomarker assay. The formation of large collaborative consortiums and multidisciplinary research teams are vital towards the successful identification and validation of high-fidelity biomarkers, particularly in the era of multiplex technology allowing high-throughput and multiplex screening of potential biomarkers [201].
Recommendations (and see Summary Statement)
In comatose post-cardiac hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) patients not treated with TH, we suggest the use of serum NSE in conjunction with clinical data for neurologic prognostication (Weak recommendation, Moderate quality of evidence).
We recommend against the use of serum NSE for prognostication in HIE treated with TH (Strong Recommendation, Moderate quality of evidence).
We recommend against the routine use of molecular biomarker for outcome prognostication in AIS, SAH, ICH, or TBI (Strong Recommendation, Low quality of evidence).
Additional Conclusions
Routine use of CSF biomarkers for prognostication in comatose post-cardiac hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) patients not treated with TH does not appear to provide valuable information. (Low quality of evidence)
There is a limited role for routine use of blood or CSF molecular biomarkers to predict vasospasm and DCI in SAH. (Low quality of evidence)
Plasma MMP-9 and c-Fn can be used in conjunction with clinical data to support prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in AIS patients treated with IV tPA within 3 hours of onset. (Low quality of evidence)
Routine use of molecular biomarkers does not help predict secondary deterioration after ICH or TBI. (Low quality of evidence)
Acknowledgments
Sherry H-Y. Chou is funded by NIH Grant # K23-NS073806 and has received research support from the American Heart Association (Grant # 10CRP2610341). She receives stipend for service as a clinical endpoint committee member for a clinical trial funded by Novartis, as the site principal investigator for ATACH-II study funded by the NIH Grant # U01-NS062091, and as DSMB member for a study funded by NIH Grant # R01-DC12584. She has received speaker honorarium from the American Academy of Neurology and travel scholarship from the Neurocritical Care Society.
Appendix 1: Participants in the International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring
Peter Le Roux, MD, FACS,
Brain and Spine Center,
Suite 370, Medical Science Building,
Lankenau Medical Center,
100 East Lancaster Avenue, Wynnewood, PA 19096, USA.
Tel: +1 610 642 3005
Fax: 610 642 3057
lerouxp@mlhs.org
David K Menon MD PhD FRCP FRCA FFICM FMedSci,
Head, Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge
Consultant, Neurosciences Critical Care Unit
Box 93, Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
dkm13@wbic.cam.ac.uk
Paul Vespa, MD, FCCM, FAAN, FNCS
Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery
Director of Neurocritical Care
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
PVespa@mednet.ucla.edu
Giuseppe Citerio, MD
Director NeuroIntensive Care Unit,
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care
Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza.
Via Pergolesi 33, Monza 20900, Italy
g.citerio@hsgerardo.org
Mary Kay Bader RN, MSN, CCNS, FAHA, FNCS
Neuro/Critical Care CNS
Mission Hospital
Mission Viejo CA 92691, USA
Marykay.Bader@stjoe.org
Gretchen M. Brophy, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, FCCM
Professor of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science and
Neurosurgery
Virginia Commonwealth University
Medical College of Virginia Campus
410 N. 12th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23298–0533 USA
gbrophy@vcu.edu
Michael N. Diringer, MD
Professor of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Anesthesiology
Chief, Neurocritical Care Section
Washington University
Dept. of Neurology, Campus Box 8111
660 S Euclid Ave
St Louis, MO 63110 USA
diringerm@neuro.wustl.edu
Nino Stocchetti, MD
Professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Department of physiopathology and transplant
Milan University
Director Neuro ICU
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore
Policlinico
Via F Sforza, 35 20122 Milan Italy
stocchet@policlinico.mi.it
Walter Videtta, MD
ICU Neurocritical Care
Hospital Nacional ‘Prof. a. Posadas’
El Palomar - Pcia. de Buenos Aires
Argentina
wvidetta@ar.inter.net
Rocco Armonda, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Medstar Health, 3800 Reservoir Road NW
Washington DC 20007
USA
Rocco.Armonda@gmail.com
Neeraj Badjatia, MD
Department of Neurology
University of Maryland Medical Center,
22 S Greene St
Baltimore, MD, 21201
USA
nbadjatia@umm.edu
Julian Boesel, MD
Department of Neurology
Ruprect-Karls University
Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400,
D-69120 Heidelberg,
Germany
Julian.Boesel@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Randal Chesnut, MD, FCCM, FACS
Harborview Medical Center,
University of Washington Mailstop 359766
325 Ninth Ave,
Seattle WA 98104–2499
USA
chesnutr@u.washington.edu
Sherry H-Y. Chou, MD, MMSc, FNCS
Assistant Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School
Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
75 Francis Street
Boston MA, 02115
USA
schou1@partners.org
Jan Claassen, MD, PhD, FNCS
Assistant Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery
Head of Neurocritical Care and Medical Director of the
Neurological Intensive Care Unit
Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons
177 Fort Washington Avenue, Milstein 8 Center room 300,
New York, NY 10032
USA
jc1439@cumc.columbia.edu
Marek Czosnyka, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery
University of Cambridge,
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Box 167
Cambridge, CB20QQ
United Kingdom
mc141@medschl.cam.ac.uk
Michael De Georgia, MD
Professor of Neurology
Director, Neurocritical Care Center
Co-Director, Cerebrovascular Center
University Hospital Case Medical Center
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine
11100 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44106
michael.degeorgia@uhhospitals.org
Anthony Figaji, MD, PhD
Head of Pediatric Neurosurgery
University of Cape Town
617 Institute for Child Health
Red Cross Children’s Hospital
Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town,
South Africa
anthony.figaji@uct.ac.za
Jennifer Fugate, DO
Department of Neurology,
Mayo Clinic,
200 First Street SW
Rochester, MN 55905
Fugate.Jennifer@mayo.edu
Raimund Helbok, MD
Department of Neurology, Neurocritical Care Unit
Innsbruck Medical University,
Anichstr.35, 6020
Innsbruck,
Austria
raimund.helbok@uki.at
David Horowitz, MD
Associate Chief Medical Officer
University of Pennsylvania Health System,
3701 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA, 19104
USA
david.horowitz@uphs.upenn.edu
Peter Hutchinson, MD
Professor of Neurosurgery
NIHR Research Professor
Department of Clinical Neurosciences
University of Cambridge
Box 167 Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Cambridge CB2 2QQ
United Kingdom
pjah2@cam.ac.uk
Monisha Kumar, MD
Department of Neurology
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania,
3 West Gates
3400 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA, 19104
USA
monisha.kumar@uphs.upenn.edu
Molly McNett, RN, PhD
Director, Nursing Research
The MetroHealth System
2500 MetroHealth Drive,
Cleveland, OH 44109
USA
mmcnett@metrohealth.org
Chad Miller, MD
Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases and Neurocritical
Care
The Ohio State University
395 W. 12th Ave, 7th Floor
Columbus, OH 43210
ChadM.Miller@osumc.edu
Andrew Naidech, MD, MSPH
Department of Neurology
Northwestern University Feinberg SOM 710
N Lake Shore Drive, 11th floor
Chicago, IL 60611
ANaidech@nmff.org
Mauro Oddo, MD
Department of Intensive Care Medicine
CHUV University Hospital, BH 08–623
Faculty of Biology and Medicine University of Lausanne
1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Mauro.Oddo@chuv.ch
DaiWai Olson, RN, PhD
Associate Professor of Neurology, Neurotherapeutics and
Neurosurgery
University of Texas Southwestern
5323 Harry Hines Blvd
Dallas, TX 75390–8897
USA
daiwai.olson@utsouthwestern.edu
Kristine O’Phelan M.D.
Director of Neurocritical Care
Associate Professor, Department of Neurology
University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine
JMH, 1611 NW 12th Ave, Suite 405
Miami, FL, 33136
USA
kophelan@med.miami.edu
Javier Provencio, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Cerebrovascular Center and Neuroinflammation Research
Center
Lerner College of Medicine
Cleveland Clinic,
9500 Euclid Ave, NC30
Cleveland, OH 44195
USA
provenj@ccf.org
Corina Puppo, MD
Assistant Professor, Intensive Care Unit,
Hospital de Clinicas, Universidad de la República,
Montevideo
Uruguay
coripuppo@gmail.com
Richard Riker, MD
Critical Care Medicine
Maine Medical Center,
22 Bramhall Street
Portland, Maine 04102–3175
USA
RRiker@cmamaine.com
Claudia Robertson, MD
Department of Neurosurgery
Medical Director of Center for Neurosurgical Intensive
Care,
Ben Taub Hospital
Baylor College of Medicine,
1504 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030
USA
claudiar@bcm.tmc.edu
J. Michael Schmidt, PhD, MSc
Director of Neuro-ICU Monitoring and Informatics
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
Milstein Hospital 8 Garden South, Suite 331
177 Fort Washington Avenue,
New York, NY 10032
USA
mjs2134@columbia.edu
Fabio Taccone, MD
Department of Intensive Care, Laboratoire de Recherche
Experimentale
Erasme Hospital,
Route de Lennik, 808
1070 Brussels
Belgium
ftaccone@ulb.ac.be
Footnotes
Conflict of interest Claudia S. Robertson declares that she has no conflict of interest.
The Participants in the International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on the Multimodality Monitoring are listed in “Appendix”.
Contributor Information
Sherry H-Y. Chou, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Claudia S. Robertson, Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
References
- 1.Zandbergen EG, Hijdra A, Koelman JH, et al. Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic coma. Neurology. 2006;66:62–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pfeifer R, Borner A, Krack A, Sigusch HH, Surber R, Figulla HR. Outcome after cardiac arrest: predictive values and limitations of the neuroproteins neuron-specific enolase and protein S-100 and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Resuscitation. 2005;65:49–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Meynaar IA, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Van der Wetering J, et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase predicts outcome in postanoxic coma: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:189–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martens P, Raabe A, Johnsson P. Serum S-100 and neuron-specific enolase for prediction of regaining consciousness after global cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1998;29:2363–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schoerkhuber W, Kittler H, Sterz F, et al. Time course of serum neuron-specific enolase. A predictor of neurological outcome in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Stroke. 1999;30:1598–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rosen H, Sunnerhagen KS, Herlitz J, Blomstrand C, Rosengren L. Serum levels of the brain-derived proteins S-100 and NSE predict long-term outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2001;49:183–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mlynash M, Buckwalter MS, Okada A, et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase levels from the same patients differ between laboratories: assessment of a prospective post-cardiac arrest cohort. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19:161–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bottiger BW, Mobes S, Glatzer R, et al. Astroglial protein S-100 is an early and sensitive marker of hypoxic brain damage and outcome after cardiac arrest in humans. Circulation. 2001;103:2694–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hachimi-Idrissi S, Van der Auwera M, Schiettecatte J, Ebinger G, Michotte Y, Huyghens L. S-100 protein as early predictor of regaining consciousness after out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2002;53:251–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nagao K, Hayashi N, Kanmatsuse K, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker of resuscitation in patients with cardiac arrest outside the hospital. Circ J. 2004;68:477–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sodeck GH, Domanovits H, Sterz F, et al. Can brain natriuretic peptide predict outcome after cardiac arrest? An observational study. Resuscitation. 2007;74:439–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kasai A, Nagao K, Kikushima K, et al. Prognostic value of venous blood ammonia in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ J. 2012;76:891–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shinozaki K, Oda S, Sadahiro T, et al. Blood ammonia and lactate levels on hospital arrival as a predictive biomarker in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82:404–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oda Y, Tsuruta R, Fujita M, et al. Prediction of the neurological outcome with intrathecal high mobility group box 1 and S100B in cardiac arrest victims: a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2012;83:1006–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Roine RO, Somer H, Kaste M, Viinikka L, Karonen SL. Neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prediction by cerebrospinal fluid enzyme analysis. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:753–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Karkela J, Bock E, Kaukinen S. CSF and serum brain-specific creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-BB), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) as prognostic markers for hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest in man. J Neurol Sci. 1993;116:100–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sherman AL, Tirschwell DL, Micklesen PJ, Longstreth WT Jr, Robinson LR. Somatosensory potentials, CSF creatine kinase BB activity, and awakening after cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2000;54:889–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT Jr, Rauch-Matthews ME, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid creatine kinase BB isoenzyme activity and neurologic prognosis after cardiac arrest. Neurology. 1997;48:352–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosen H, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L. CSF levels of neurofilament is a valuable predictor of long-term outcome after cardiac arrest. J Neurol Sci. 2004;221:19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rossetti AO, Oddo M, Logroscino G, Kaplan PW. Prognostication after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: a prospective study. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:301–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rossetti AO, Carrera E, Oddo M. Early EEG correlates of neuronal injury after brain anoxia. Neurology. 2012;78: 796–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cronberg T, Brizzi M, Liedholm LJ, et al. Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest: recommendations from the Swedish Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation. 2013;84:867–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shinozaki K, Oda S, Sadahiro T, et al. Serum S-100B is superior to neuron-specific enolase as an early prognostic biomarker for neurological outcome following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2009;80:870–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Daubin C, Quentin C, Allouche S, et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase as predictor of outcome in comatose cardiac-arrest survivors: a prospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rundgren M, Karlsson T, Nielsen N, Cronberg T, Johnsson P, Friberg H. Neuron specific enolase and S-100B as predictors of outcome after cardiac arrest and induced hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2009;80:784–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Einav S, Kaufman N, Algur N, Kark JD. Modeling serum biomarkers S100 beta and neuron-specific enolase as predictors of outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an aid to clinical decision making. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:304–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tiainen M, Roine RO, Pettila V, Takkunen O. Serum neuron-specific enolase and S-100B protein in cardiac arrest patients treated with hypothermia. Stroke. 2003;34:2881–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stammet P, Wagner DR, Gilson G, Devaux Y. Modeling serum level of s100beta and bispectral index to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:851–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cronberg T, Rundgren M, Westhall E, et al. Neuron-specific enolase correlates with other prognostic markers after cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2011;77:623–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mortberg E, Zetterberg H, Nordmark J, Blennow K, Rosengren L, Rubertsson S. S-100B is superior to NSE, BDNF and GFAP in predicting outcome of resuscitation from cardiac arrest with hypothermia treatment. Resuscitation. 2011;82:26–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wiesmann M, Missler U, Hagenstrom H, Gottmann D. S-100 protein plasma levels after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139:1155–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Psachoulia C, Kouyialis A, Sakas DE, Mendelow AD. The prognostic value of serum S-100B protein in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149:231–7 discussion 7–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oertel M, Schumacher U, McArthur DL, Kastner S, Boker DK. S-100B and NSE: markers of initial impact of subarachnoid haemorrhage and their relation to vasospasm and outcome. J Clin Neurosci. 2006;13:834–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Coplin WM, Longstreth WT Jr, Lam AM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid creatine kinase-BB isoenzyme activity and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:1348–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Provencio JJ, Vora N. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and inflammation: bench to bedside and back. Semin Neurol. 2005;25:435–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dumont AS, Dumont RJ, Chow MM, et al. Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: putative role of inflammation. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:123–33 discussion 33–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McGirt MJ, Mavropoulos JC, McGirt LY, et al. Leukocytosis as an independent risk factor for cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2003;98: 1222–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chou SH, Feske SK, Simmons SL, et al. Elevated peripheral neutrophils and matrix metalloproteinase 9 as biomarkers of functional outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Transl Stroke Res. 2011;2:600–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Niikawa S, Hara S, Ohe N, Miwa Y, Ohkuma A. Correlation between blood parameters and symptomatic vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Neurol Med Chir. 1997;37:881–4 discussion 4–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sadamasa N, Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, Yamagata S. Prediction of mortality by hematological parameters on admission in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir. 2011;51:745–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dhar R, Diringer MN. The burden of the systemic inflammatory response predicts vasospasm and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8:404–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yoshimoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hoya K. Acute systemic inflammatory response syndrome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:1989–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Weir B, Disney L, Grace M, Roberts P. Daily trends in white blood cell count and temperature after subarachnoid hemorrhage from aneurysm. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:161–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maiuri F, Gallicchio B, Donati P, Carandente M. The blood leukocyte count and its prognostic significance in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Sci. 1987;31:45–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Spallone A, Acqui M, Pastore FS, Guidetti B. Relationship between leukocytosis and ischemic complications following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol. 1987;27:253–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beeftink MM, Ruigrok YM, Rinkel GJ, van den Bergh WM. Relation of serum TNF-alpha and TNF-alpha genotype with delayed cerebral ischemia and outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:405–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mack WJ, Mocco J, Hoh DJ, et al. Outcome prediction with serum intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:71–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Frijns CJ, Fijnheer R, Algra A, van Mourik JA, van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Early circulating levels of endothelial cell activation markers in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: associations with cerebral ischaemic events and outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:77–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vergouwen MD, Bakhtiari K, van Geloven N, Vermeulen M, Roos YB, Meijers JC. Reduced ADAMTS13 activity in delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:1734–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chou SH, Feske SK, Atherton J, et al. Early elevation of serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha is associated with poor outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Investig Med. 2012;60:1054–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hanafy KA, Grobelny B, Fernandez L, et al. Brain interstitial fluid TNF-alpha after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2010;291:69–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fassbender K, Hodapp B, Rossol S, et al. Inflammatory cytokines in subarachnoid haemorrhage: association with abnormal blood flow velocities in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:534–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mathiesen T, Edner G, Ulfarsson E, Andersson B. Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and tumor necrosis factor-alpha following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:215–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dietmann A, Lackner P, Fischer M, et al. Soluble endoglin and transforming growth factor-beta(1) and the development of vasospasm after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gruber A, Rossler K, Graninger W, Donner A, Illievich MU, Czech T. Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and serum concentrations of sTNFR-I, IL-1ra, and IL-6 after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000;12: 297–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Graetz D, Nagel A, Schlenk F, Sakowitz O, Vajkoczy P, Sarrafzadeh A. High ICP as trigger of proinflammatory IL-6 cytokine activation in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res. 2010;32:728–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Guo ZD, Sun XC, Zhang JH. Mechanisms of early brain injury after SAH: matrix metalloproteinase 9. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011;110:63–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gu Z, Kaul M, Yan B, et al. S-nitrosylation of matrix metalloproteinases: signaling pathway to neuronal cell death. Science. 2002;297:1186–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.McGirt MJ, Lynch JR, Blessing R, Warner DS, Friedman AH, Laskowitz DT. Serum von Willebrand factor, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels predict the onset of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1128–34 discussion 34–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Park SM, Hwang IK, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Park KS, Lee ST. Characterization of plasma gelsolin as a substrate for matrix metalloproteinases. Proteomics. 2006;6:1192–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lind SE, Smith DB, Janmey PA, Stossel TP. Role of plasma gelsolin and the vitamin D-binding protein in clearing actin from the circulation. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:736–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Haddad JG, Harper KD, Guoth M, Pietra GG, Sanger JW. Angiopathic consequences of saturating the plasma scavenger system for actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:1381–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Le HT, Hirko AC, Thinschmidt JS, et al. The protective effects of plasma gelsolin on stroke outcome in rats. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2011;3:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chou SH, Lee PS, Konigsberg RG, et al. Plasma-type gelsolin is decreased in human blood and cerebrospinal fluid after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2011;42:3624–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pan JW, He LN, Xiao F, Shen J, Zhan RY. Plasma gelsolin levels and outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2013;17:R149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fernandez-Patron C, Radomski MW, Davidge ST. Vascular matrix metalloproteinase-2 cleaves big endothelin-1 yielding a novel vasoconstrictor. Circ Res. 1999;85:906–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fernandez-Patron C, Zouki C, Whittal R, Chan JS, Davidge ST, Filep JG. Matrix metalloproteinases regulate neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion through generation of endothelin-1[1–32]. Faseb J. 2001;15:2230–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kobayashi H, Hayashi M, Kobayashi S, et al. Cerebral vasospasm and vasoconstriction caused by endothelin. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:673–8 discussion 8–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mascia L, Fedorko L, Stewart DJ, et al. Temporal relationship between endothelin-1 concentrations and cerebral vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:1185–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Seifert V, Loffler BM, Zimmermann M, Roux S, Stolke D. Endothelin concentrations in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Correlation with cerebral vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurological deficits, and volume of hematoma. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:55–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Masaoka H, Suzuki R, Hirata Y, Emori T, Marumo F, Hirakawa K. Raised plasma endothelin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 1989;2:1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Suzuki R, Masaoka H, Hirata Y, Marumo F, Isotani E, Hirakawa K. The role of endothelin-1 in the origin of cerebral vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:96–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fujimori A, Yanagisawa M, Saito A, et al. Endothelin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 1990;336:633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gaetani P, Rodriguez y Baena R, Grignani G, Spanu G, Pacchiarini L, Paoletti P. Endothelin and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a study of subarachnoid cisternal cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:66–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Macdonald RL, Higashida RT, Keller E, et al. Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage undergoing surgical clipping: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (CONSCIOUS-2). Lancet Neurol. 2012;10:618–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Juvela S, Siironen J, Lappalainen J. Apolipoprotein E genotype and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:989–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Leung CH, Poon WS, Yu LM, Wong GK, Ng HK. Apolipoprotein e genotype and outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2002;33:548–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lanterna LA, Rigoldi M, Tredici G, et al. APOE influences vasospasm and cognition of noncomatose patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2005;64:1238–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Niskakangas T, Ohman J, Niemela M, Ilveskoski E, Kunnas TA, Karhunen PJ. Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a preliminary study. Stroke. 2001;32:1181–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lanterna LA, Ruigrok Y, Alexander S, et al. Meta-analysis of APOE genotype and subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical outcome and delayed ischemia. Neurology. 2007;69:766–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kay A, Petzold A, Kerr M, Keir G, Thompson E, Nicoll J. Decreased cerebrospinal fluid apolipoprotein E after subarachnoid hemorrhage: correlation with injury severity and clinical outcome. Stroke. 2003;34:637–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Naidech AM, Kreiter KT, Janjua N, et al. Cardiac troponin elevation, cardiovascular morbidity, and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Circulation. 2005;112:2851–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ramappa P, Thatai D, Coplin W, et al. Cardiac troponin-I: a predictor of prognosis in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8:398–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yarlagadda S, Rajendran P, Miss JC, et al. Cardiovascular predictors of in-patient mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2006;5:102–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dorhout Mees SM, Hoff RG, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van den Bergh WM. Brain natriuretic peptide concentrations after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship with hypovolemia and hyponatremia. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:176–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.McGirt MJ, Blessing R, Nimjee SM, et al. Correlation of serum brain natriuretic peptide with hyponatremia and delayed ischemic neurological deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1369–73 discussion 73–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Taub PR, Fields JD, Wu AH, et al. Elevated BNP is associated with vasospasm-independent cerebral infarction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:13–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Moussouttas M, Huynh TT, Khoury J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid catecholamine levels as predictors of outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:173–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Missler U, Wiesmann M, Friedrich C, Kaps M. S-100 protein and neuron-specific enolase concentrations in blood as indicators of infarction volume and prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:1956–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Herrmann M, Vos P, Wunderlich MT, de Bruijn CH, Lamers KJ. Release of glial tissue-specific proteins after acute stroke: a comparative analysis of serum concentrations of protein S-100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Stroke. 2000;31:2670–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Foerch C, Singer OC, Neumann-Haefelin T, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M. Evaluation of serum S100B as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome and infarct volume in acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1130–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Foerch C, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Singer O, et al. S100B as a surrogate marker for successful clot lysis in hyperacute middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:322–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Foerch C, Otto B, Singer OC, et al. Serum S100B predicts a malignant course of infarction in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2004;35:2160–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Castellanos M, Leira R, Serena J, et al. Plasma cellular-fibronectin concentration predicts hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:1671–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gill R, Kemp JA, Sabin C, Pepys MB. Human C-reactive protein increases cerebral infarct size after middle cerebral artery occlusion in adult rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:1214–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Elkind MS, Tai W, Coates K, Paik MC, Sacco RL. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and outcome after ischemic stroke. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2073–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Huang Y, Jing J, Zhao XQ, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is a strong risk factor for death after acute ischemic stroke among Chinese. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012;18:261–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Shantikumar S, Grant PJ, Catto AJ, Bamford JM, Carter AM. Elevated C-reactive protein and long-term mortality after ischaemic stroke: relationship with markers of endothelial cell and platelet activation. Stroke. 2009;40:977–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Montaner J, Fernandez-Cadenas I, Molina CA, et al. Poststroke C-reactive protein is a powerful prognostic tool among candidates for thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37:1205–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.den Hertog HM, van Rossum JA, van der Worp HB, et al. C-reactive protein in the very early phase of acute ischemic stroke: association with poor outcome and death. J Neurol. 2009;256:2003–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Idicula TT, Brogger J, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L. Admission C-reactive protein after acute ischemic stroke is associated with stroke severity and mortality: the ‘Bergen stroke study’. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Winbeck K, Poppert H, Etgen T, Conrad B, Sander D. Prognostic relevance of early serial C-reactive protein measurements after first ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2002;33:2459–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Topakian R, Strasak AM, Nussbaumer K, Haring HP, Aichner FT. Prognostic value of admission C-reactive protein in stroke patients undergoing iv thrombolysis. J Neurol. 2008;255:1190–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kim J, Song TJ, Park JH, et al. Different prognostic value of white blood cell subtypes in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2012;222:464–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Nardi K, Milia P, Eusebi P, Paciaroni M, Caso V, Agnelli G. Admission leukocytosis in acute cerebral ischemia: influence on early outcome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21:819–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Yin CG, Jiang L, Tang B, Zhang H, Qian Q, Niu GZ. Prognostic significance of plasma visfatin levels in patients with ischemic stroke. Peptides. 2013;42:101–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Cuzner ML, Opdenakker G. Plasminogen activators and matrix metalloproteases, mediators of extracellular proteolysis in inflammatory demyelination of the central nervous system. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;94:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Barr TL, Latour LL, Lee KY, et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption in humans is independently associated with increased matrix metalloproteinase-9. Stroke. 2010;41:e123–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Sumii T, Lo EH. Involvement of matrix metalloproteinase in thrombolysis-associated hemorrhagic transformation after embolic focal ischemia in rats. Stroke. 2002;33:831–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lo EH, Wang X, Cuzner ML. Extracellular proteolysis in brain injury and inflammation: role for plasminogen activators and matrix metalloproteinases. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Heo JH, Kim SH, Lee KY, Kim EH, Chu CK, Nam JM. Increase in plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 in acute stroke patients with thrombolysis failure. Stroke. 2003;34:e48–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ning M, Furie KL, Koroshetz WJ, et al. Association between tPA therapy and raised early matrix metalloproteinase-9 in acute stroke. Neurology. 2006;66:1550–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Castellanos M, Sobrino T, Millan M, et al. Serum cellular fibronectin and matrix metalloproteinase-9 as screening biomarkers for the prediction of parenchymal hematoma after thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter confirmatory study. Stroke. 2007;38:1855–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Montaner J, Molina CA, Monasterio J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 pretreatment level predicts intracranial hemorrhagic complications after thrombolysis in human stroke. Circulation. 2003;107:598–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Montaner J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase expression is related to hemorrhagic transformation after cardioembolic stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:2762–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Castellanos M, Leira R, Serena J, et al. Plasma metalloproteinase-9 concentration predicts hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:40–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Graham CA, Chan RW, Chan DY, Chan CP, Wong LK, Rainer TH. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 mRNA: an early prognostic marker for patients with acute stroke. Clin Biochem. 2012;45:352–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Serena J, Blanco M, Castellanos M, et al. The prediction of malignant cerebral infarction by molecular brain barrier disruption markers. Stroke. 2005;36:1921–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Moldes O, Sobrino T, Millan M, et al. High serum levels of endothelin-1 predict severe cerebral edema in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with t-PA. Stroke. 2008;39:2006–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ziv I, Fleminger G, Djaldetti R, Achiron A, Melamed E, Sokolovsky M. Increased plasma endothelin-1 in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1992;23:1014–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lampl Y, Fleminger G, Gilad R, Galron R, Sarova-Pinhas I, Sokolovsky M. Endothelin in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of patients in the early stage of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:1951–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Haapaniemi E, Tatlisumak T, Hamel K, et al. Plasma endothelin-1 levels neither increase nor correlate with neurological scores, stroke risk factors, or outcome in patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:720–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kazmierski R, Michalak S, Wencel-Warot A, Nowinski WL. Serum tight-junction proteins predict hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients. Neurology. 2012;79:1677–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Chiquete E, Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Murillo-Bonilla LM, et al. Serum uric acid and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: PREMIER study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35:168–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Matsumoto M, Sakaguchi M, Okazaki S, et al. Relationship between plasma (D)-dimer level and cerebral infarction volume in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35:64–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Delgado P, Alvarez Sabin J, Santamarina E, et al. Plasma S100B level after acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2006;37:2837–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Hu YY, Dong XQ, Yu WH, Zhang ZY. Change in plasma S100B level after acute spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage. Shock. 2010;33:134–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.James ML, Blessing R, Phillips-Bute BG, Bennett E, Laskowitz DT. S100B and brain natriuretic peptide predict functional neurological outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage. Biomarkers. 2009;14:388–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Brea D, Sobrino T, Blanco M, et al. Temporal profile and clinical significance of serum neuron-specific enolase and S100 in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1513–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Thomas DG, Palfreyman JW, Ratcliffe JG. Serum-myelin-basic-protein assay in diagnosis and prognosis of patients with head injury. Lancet. 1978;1:113–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B. Biochemical serum markers of traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2002;52:798–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hu HT, Xiao F, Yan YQ, Wen SQ, Zhang L. The prognostic value of serum tau in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Biochem. 2012;45:1320–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Cai JY, Lu C, Chen MH, et al. Predictive value of phosphorylated axonal neurofilament subunit H for clinical outcome in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;424:182–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Castillo J, Davalos A, Alvarez-Sabin J, et al. Molecular signatures of brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2002;58:624–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Di Napoli M, Godoy DA, Campi V, et al. C-reactive protein level measurement improves mortality prediction when added to the spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage score. Stroke. 2011;42:1230–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Agnihotri S, Czap A, Staff I, Fortunato G, McCullough LD. Peripheral leukocyte counts and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Leira R, Davalos A, Silva Y, et al. Early neurologic deterioration in intracerebral hemorrhage: predictors and associated factors. Neurology. 2004;63:461–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Diedler J, Sykora M, Hahn P, et al. C-reactive-protein levels associated with infection predict short- and long-term outcome after supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:272–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Wang HC, Lin WC, Lin YJ, et al. The association between serum adhesion molecules and outcome in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2011;15:R284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Hernandez-Guillamon M, Sole M, Delgado P, et al. VAP-1/SSAO plasma activity and brain expression in human hemorrhagic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Fang HY, Ko WJ, Lin CY. Plasma interleukin 11 levels correlate with outcome of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Surg Neurol. 2005;64:511–7 discussion 7–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Gu SJ, Xuan HF, Lu M, et al. Admission plasma visfatin level strongly correlates with hematoma growth and early neurologic deterioration in patients with acute spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;425:85–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Huang Q, Dai WM, Jie YQ, Yu GF, Fan XF, Wu A. High concentrations of visfatin in the peripheral blood of patients with acute basal ganglia hemorrhage are associated with poor outcome. Peptides. 2013;39:55–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Zhang X, Lu XM, Huang LF, Li X. Prognostic value of leptin: 6-month outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Peptides. 2013;43:133–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Abilleira S, Montaner J, Molina CA, Monasterio J, Castillo J, Alvarez-Sabin J. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 concentration after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99:65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Alvarez-Sabin J, Delgado P, Abilleira S, et al. Temporal profile of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship to clinical and radiological outcome. Stroke. 2004;35:1316–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Silva Y, Leira R, Tejada J, Lainez JM, Castillo J, Davalos A. Molecular signatures of vascular injury are associated with early growth of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2005;36:86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Li N, Liu YF, Ma L, et al. Association of molecular markers with perihematomal edema and clinical outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2013;44:658–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Zhao DQ, Wang K, Zhang HD, Li YJ. Significant reduction of plasma gelsolin levels in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;415:202–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Chiu CC, Li YN, Lin LJ, Hsiao CT, Hsiao KY, Chen IC. Serum D-dimer as a predictor of mortality in patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:810–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Rodriguez-Luna D, Rubiera M, Ribo M, et al. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level predicts hematoma growth and clinical outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2011;42:2447–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Ramirez-Moreno JM, Casado-Naranjo I, Portilla JC, et al. Serum cholesterol LDL and 90-day mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2009;40:1917–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Hays A, Diringer MN. Elevated troponin levels are associated with higher mortality following intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:1330–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Huang M, Hu YY, Dong XQ. High concentrations of procoagulant microparticles in the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood of patients with acute basal ganglia hemorrhage are associated with poor outcome. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:481–9 discussion 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Wang HC, Lin YJ, Lin WC, et al. The value of serial plasma nuclear and mitochondrial DNA levels in acute spontaneous intra-cerebral haemorrhage. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:1532–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Zheng HW, Wang YL, Lin JX, et al. Circulating MicroRNAs as potential risk biomarkers for hematoma enlargement after intracerebral hemorrhage. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012;18:1003–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Zhang X, Lu XM, Huang LF, Ye H. Copeptin is associated with one-year mortality and functional outcome in patients with acute spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage. Peptides. 2012;33:336–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Chen YC, Chen CM, Liu JL, Chen ST, Cheng ML, Chiu DT. Oxidative markers in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: leukocyte 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine as an independent predictor of the 30-day outcome. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:1184–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Rodriguez-Rodriguez A, Egea-Guerrero JJ, Leon-Justel A, et al. Role of S100B protein in urine and serum as an early predictor of mortality after severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;414:228–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Pelinka LE, Toegel E, Mauritz W, Redl H. Serum S 100 B: a marker of brain damage in traumatic brain injury with and without multiple trauma. Shock. 2003;19:195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Berger RP, Adelson PD, Pierce MC, Dulani T, Cassidy LD, Kochanek PM. Serum neuron-specific enolase, S100B, and myelin basic protein concentrations after inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:61–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Metz C, Brawanski A. Comparison of clinical, radiologic, and serum marker as prognostic factors after severe head injury. J Trauma. 1999;47:1126–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Raabe A, Grolms C, Keller M, Dohnert J, Sorge O, Seifert V. Correlation of computed tomography findings and serum brain damage markers following severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140:787–91 discussion 91–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Nylen K, Ost M, Csajbok LZ, et al. Serum levels of S100B, S100A1B and S100BB are all related to outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150:221–7 discussion 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Rainey T, Lesko M, Sacho R, Lecky F, Childs C. Predicting outcome after severe traumatic brain injury using the serum S100B biomarker: results using a single (24 h) time-point. Resuscitation. 2009;80:341–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Thelin EP, Johannesson L, Nelson D, Bellander BM. S100B is an important outcome predictor in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:519–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Wiesmann M, Steinmeier E, Magerkurth O, Linn J, Gottmann D, Missler U. Outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury: comparison of neurological status, CT findings, and blood levels of S100B and GFAP. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;121:178–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Pelinka LE, Kroepfl A, Leixnering M, Buchinger W, Raabe A, Redl H. GFAP versus S100B in serum after traumatic brain injury: relationship to brain damage and outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1553–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Mercier E, Boutin A, Lauzier F, et al. Predictive value of S-100beta protein for prognosis in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f1757 (Clinical research ed.). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Metting Z, Wilczak N, Rodiger LA, Schaaf JM, van der Naalt J. GFAP and S100B in the acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2012;78:1428–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Olivecrona M, Rodling-Wahlstrom M, Naredi S, Koskinen LO. S-100B and neuron specific enolase are poor outcome predictors in severe traumatic brain injury treated by an intracranial pressure targeted therapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:1241–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Vos PE, Lamers KJ, Hendriks JC, et al. Glial and neuronal proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2004;62:1303–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Yamazaki Y, Yada K, Morii S, Kitahara T, Ohwada T. Diagnostic significance of serum neuron-specific enolase and myelin basic protein assay in patients with acute head injury. Surg Neurol. 1995;43:267–70 discussion 70–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Herrmann M, Curio N, Jost S, Wunderlich MT, Synowitz H, Wallesch CW. Protein S-100B and neuron specific enolase as early neurobiochemical markers of the severity of traumatic brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1999;14:109–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Topolovec-Vranic J, Pollmann-Mudryj MA, Ouchterlony D, et al. The value of serum biomarkers in prediction models of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2011;71:S478–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Ross SA, Cunningham RT, Johnston CF, Rowlands BJ. Neuron-specific enolase as an aid to outcome prediction in head injury. Br J Neurosurg. 1996;10:471–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Liliang PC, Liang CL, Weng HC, et al. Tau proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Surg Res. 2010;160:302–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Vos PE, Jacobs B, Andriessen TM, et al. GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study. Neurology. 2010;75:1786–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Nylen K, Ost M, Csajbok LZ, et al. Increased serum-GFAP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury is related to outcome. J Neurol Sci. 2006;240:85–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Okonkwo DO, Yue JK, Puccio AM, et al. GFAP-BDP as an acute diagnostic marker in traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury study. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1490–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Papa L, Akinyi L, Liu MC, et al. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase is a novel biomarker in humans for severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2009;38:138–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Mondello S, Papa L, Buki A, et al. Neuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study. Crit Care. 2011;15:R156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Mondello S, Linnet A, Buki A, et al. Clinical utility of serum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase as a biomarker for severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:666–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Brophy GM, Mondello S, Papa L, et al. Biokinetic analysis of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in severe traumatic brain injury patient biofluids. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:861–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Papa L, Lewis LM, Silvestri S, et al. Serum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase distinguish mild traumatic brain injury from trauma controls and are elevated in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1335–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Pineda JA, Lewis SB, Valadka AB, et al. Clinical significance of alphaII-spectrin breakdown products in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:354–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Brophy GM, Pineda JA, Papa L, et al. alphaII-Spectrin breakdown product cerebrospinal fluid exposure metrics suggest differences in cellular injury mechanisms after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:471–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Mondello S, Robicsek SA, Gabrielli A, et al. alphaII-spectrin breakdown products (SBDPs): diagnosis and outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1203–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Diaz-Arrastia R, Wang KK, Papa L, et al. Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Czeiter E, Mondello S, Kovacs N, et al. Brain injury biomarkers may improve the predictive power of the IMPACT outcome calculator. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1770–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Chabok SY, Moghadam AD, Saneei Z, Amlashi FG, Leili EK, Amiri ZM. Neuron-specific enolase and S100BB as outcome predictors in severe diffuse axonal injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1654–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Gurkanlar D, Lakadamyali H, Ergun T, Yilmaz C, Yucel E, Altinors N. Predictive value of leucocytosis in head trauma. Turk Neurosurg. 2009;19:211–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Rovlias A, Kotsou S. The blood leukocyte count and its prognostic significance in severe head injury. Surg Neurol. 2001;55:190–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Stein DM, Lindel AL, Murdock KR, Kufera JA, Menaker J, Scalea TM. Use of serum biomarkers to predict secondary insults following severe traumatic brain injury. Shock. 2012;37:563–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Schneider Soares FM, Menezes de Souza N, Liborio Schwarzbold M, et al. Interleukin-10 is an independent biomarker of severe traumatic brain injury prognosis. NeuroImmunoModulation. 2012;19:377–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Tasci A, Okay O, Gezici AR, Ergun R, Ergungor F. Prognostic value of interleukin-1 beta levels after acute brain injury. Neurol Res. 2003;25:871–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Antunes AA, Sotomaior VS, Sakamoto KS, de Camargo Neto CP, Martins C, Aguiar LR. Interleukin-6 plasmatic levels in patients with head trauma and intracerebral hemorrhage. Asian J Neurosurg. 2010;5:68–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Singhal A, Baker AJ, Hare GM, Reinders FX, Schlichter LC, Moulton RJ. Association between cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 concentrations and outcome after severe human traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:929–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Xu JF, Liu WG, Dong XQ, Yang SB, Fan J. Change in plasma gelsolin level after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:491–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Jin Y, Li BY, Qiu LL, Ling YR, Bai ZQ. Decreased plasma gelsolin is associated with 1-year outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Crit Care. 2012;27(527):e1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Wijman CA, Smirnakis SM, Vespa P, et al. Research and technology in neurocritical care. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16:42–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]