Abstract
It is widely hypothesised that primeval life utilised small organic molecules as sources of carbon and energy. However, the presence of such primordial ingredients in early Earth habitats has not yet been demonstrated. Here we report the existence of indigenous organic molecules and gases in primary fluid inclusions in c. 3.5-billion-year-old barites (Dresser Formation, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia). The compounds identified (e.g., H2S, COS, CS2, CH4, acetic acid, organic (poly-)sulfanes, thiols) may have formed important substrates for purported ancestral sulfur and methanogenic metabolisms. They also include stable building blocks of methyl thioacetate (methanethiol, acetic acid) – a putative key agent in primordial energy metabolism and thus the emergence of life. Delivered by hydrothermal fluids, some of these compounds may have fuelled microbial communities associated with the barite deposits. Our findings demonstrate that early Archaean hydrothermal fluids contained essential primordial ingredients that provided fertile substrates for earliest life on our planet.
Subject terms: Biogeochemistry, Geochemistry, Geology
It is widely hypothesised that primeval life utilized small organic molecules as sources of carbon and energy, however, the presence of such primordial ingredients in early Earth habitats has not yet been demonstrated. Here the authors report the existence of indigenous organic molecules and gases in primary fluid inclusions in c. 3.5- billion-year-old rocks from Western Australia.
Introduction
Primeval microbes likely required small organic molecules to act as building blocks for biomass and as catabolic substrates for heterotrophic metabolism. A potential source of such compounds includes recycled and redistributed organic matter from pre-existing biomass1. In addition, ample exogenous organic matter probably had been delivered to the early Earth by interplanetary dust particles and meteorites2,3. Experiments have also shown that organic molecules relevant for primordial life can be formed by synthesising organic compounds from inorganic atmospheric gases4,5. As important, endogenous synthesis and processing of organic molecules could have occurred in marine and terrestrial (i.e. hot spring) hydrothermal environments6–12. In such settings, organic molecules may form, or react, at elevated temperatures and pressures within the steady flow of inorganic hydrothermal chemistry (e.g. H2S, CO2, H27,13). One hypothesis on organic synthesis at hydrothermal sites suggests that the reaction of iron(II) sulfide (FeS) to pyrite (FeS2) with H2S drives the reduction of CO2 to organic molecules14. Moreover, a primordial carbon fixation mechanism involving the reaction of CO with methanethiol (CH3SH) on catalytic metal (Ni-/Fe-) sulfide surfaces could be demonstrated in the laboratory under hydrothermal conditions. This experiment produced an activated form of acetic acid that represents a plausible building block for further organic synthesis, for example, into acyl lipids15. As yet, however, such distinctive organic molecules have not been found in rocks that directly testify to the emergence of life on our planet.
The c. 3.5 billion-year-old Dresser Formation (Pilbara Craton, Western Australia) is one of the most important windows into hydrothermal habitats on early Earth16,17. The rocks are only mildly metamorphosed (prehnite-pumpellyite to lower greenschist facies18,19) and still preserve numerous putative biosignatures, including stromatolites10,17,20,21, microfossils22,23, and isotopic anomalies23–27. Further, cherts (SiO2) and barites (BaSO4) of the Dresser Formation contain kerogenous organic material of supposedly biological origin1,22,26,28. Detailed field mapping, petrographic observations, and mineralogical analyses revealed that the Dresser Formation was formed in a hydrothermal setting, most likely a volcanic caldera10,16,17. Thus, it appears plausible that organisms in the Dresser environments grew chemotrophically, fuelled by hydrothermal fluids that delivered inorganic and organic substrates. Indeed, stable carbon and sulfur isotopic anomalies indicate methanogenic and sulfur-disproportionating microbes as key players in these early microbial communities16,27,29, although the exact metabolisms still await further evidence and testing.
Cherts and barites of the Dresser Formation contain abundant primary fluid inclusions29–33, that is, fluids and/or gases entrapped in minerals34. These fluid inclusions represent a valuable archive, as their chemistry can potentially be preserved for billions of years29–32,35–37. Barite appears to be a particularly robust host mineral because of its low solubility and high stability under a wide range of pressure, temperature and redox conditions38,39. Therefore, fluid inclusions in the Dresser barites are excellent candidates in the search for organic molecules that once supported microbial life. Previous work identified H2O, CO2, H2S, and minor CH4 as the main inorganic constituents of the fluid inclusions in Dresser barites32,33. However, the content of organic molecules, potential key ingredients for early life, is as yet unknown.
Here we report on the presence of biologically-relevant primordial organic molecules in primary fluid inclusions trapped in barites of the c. 3.5 billion-year-old Dresser Formation. To explore the full range of volatiles, we combined gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), microthermometry, fluid inclusion petrography, and stable isotope analysis. Our findings reveal an intriguing diversity of organic molecules with known or inferred metabolic relevance and provide a strong clue as to how ancient hydrothermal fluids sustained microbial life ~3.5 billion years ago.
Results
Field and petrographic observations
The Dresser Formation contains thick barite units with colours ranging from white and grey to black. Black barites exhibit coarse crystalline textures and yield a strong H2S odour when freshly crushed. The sedimentary black barite studied here was sampled in the Dresser mine, where it was interbedded with originally sulfidic17,40 stromatolites (Fig. 1). Field and petrographic evidence clearly suggest a primary origin of the barite (e.g. no progressive replacement of stromatolite interbeds, no relicts of potential precursor materials within the barite: Figs. 1, 2). Thin section analysis revealed the presence of abundant primary and rare secondary inclusions (Fig. 2a–c). Most primary fluid inclusions are small (c. 10 µm), translucent, and often oriented parallel to planes of barite crystals, thereby tracing succeeding growth phases. Morphologies of some fluid inclusions indicated necking down, which is a typical modification under stress conditions after crystallisation34. These inclusions are typically stretched and may split up in segments that then usually show different composition and density.
Fluid inclusion classification and composition
The fluid inclusions were analysed optically on a heating-freezing stage and by Raman spectroscopy. The black barites contain aqueous carbonic-sulfuric and non-aqueous carbonic-sulfuric fluid inclusions (hereafter, aqueous, and non-aqueous, respectively; Table 1). Aqueous inclusions show highly variable water volume fractions of 0.1–1. At room temperature, they typically exhibit a double meniscus, indicating the presence of three phases: water + another (CO2–H2S-rich) liquid + vapour (Fig. 2d). In some cases, the other liquid is only visible during cooling runs. In comparison, non-aqueous fluid inclusions usually contain a CO2–H2S-rich liquid and a vapour phase (Fig. 2e; Table 1), although the liquid phase is sometimes absent at room temperature.
Table 1.
Gas composition (mol%) | Raman-active solids | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluid inclusion | Phases at Troom | Water vol. frac. | CO2 | H2S | CH4 | N2 | COS (carbonyl sulfide) | Kerogen | Anatase | Pyrite | Strontianite | Sulfur |
Aqueous carbonic-sulfuric inclusions (± strontianite ±sulfur) | ||||||||||||
2A_01 | Lw + V + S (not Raman-active) | 0.99 | n.d. | |||||||||
3F-4_04 | Lw + V | 0.99 | 100 | |||||||||
3A_05 | L + V + S1 + S2 + opaque | 0.9 | 100 | X | X | |||||||
3F-4_03 | Lw + L + V + S | 0.6 | 99.2 | 0.8 | X | |||||||
3F-4_01 | Lw + V | 0.8 | 96.2 | 3.1 | 0.7 | |||||||
1D-1_01 | Lw + V + S | 0.9 | 93.8 | 6.2 | X | |||||||
3F-4_02 | Lw + V + S | 0.9 | 93.4 | 6.6 | X | |||||||
3_01 | Lw + V + S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 | 0.6 | 91.6 | 8.4 | X | X | ||||||
3D_01 | Lw + L + V + S | 0.3 | 87.0 | 13.0 | X | X | ||||||
3D_04 | (Lw) + L + V + S1 + S2 | 0.1 | 86.0 | 14.0 | X | X | ||||||
3F-4_05 | Lw + V + S1 + S2 + S3 | 0.95 | 85.6 | 14.4 | (X) | X | X | X | ||||
1D-1_02 | Lw + V + S | 0.9 | 85.3 | 13.6 | (X) | X | ||||||
3D_03 | (Lw) + L + V + S1 + S2 | 0.1 | 84.3 | 15.2 | 0.4 | ? | X | X | ||||
3-D_05 | Lw + L + V + S1 + S2 + S3 + opaque | 0.7 | 84.0 | 16.0 | X | ? | X | ? | ||||
3D_02 | (Lw) + L + V | 0.1 | 81.0 | 19.0 | ? | |||||||
1A-2_08 | Lw + L2 + V + S1 | 0.9 | 76.0 | 24.0 | ? | X | ||||||
Non-aqueous carbonic-sulfuric inclusions (± sulfur ±kerogen) | ||||||||||||
1A-2_04 | L + V + S1 + S2 | « | 78.0 | 21.6 | 0.4 | X | X | |||||
1A-2_06 | L + V + S | « | 78.0 | 21.6 | 0.4 | (X) | X | |||||
1A-2_05 | L + V + S1 + S2 | « | 77.5 | 23.0 | 0.5 | (X) | X | |||||
1A-2_07 | L + S1 | « | 76.0 | 23.5 | 0.5 | ? | X | X | ||||
1C-1_01 | L + V + S | « | 64.9 | 33.7 | 1.4 | X | ||||||
1C-1_02 | L + V + S | « | 62.7 | 36.4 | 0.9 | X |
Lw liquid water, L other liquid (e.g. CO2), V vapour, S solid, vol. frac. volume fraction.
Both types of fluid inclusions typically contain solid daughter phases (Fig. 2d, e; Table 1). Aqueous inclusions usually contain strontianite (SrCO3) and sulfur as daughter crystals. Varieties with pure CO2 in the vapour phase (volume fractions of c. 0.9) may additionally include anatase (TiO2), pyrite, and possibly also halite (NaCl). In non-aqueous inclusions, typical daughter phases are sulfur, kerogen and, in few cases, halite.
The main gas components in both fluid inclusion types are CO2 and H2S, accompanied by minor amounts of CH4, N2, and COS (carbonyl sulfide) (Fig. 3). Aqueous fluid inclusions contain less H2S than non-aqueous fluid inclusions (0–24 mol% and 21–36 mol%, respectively). Furthermore, aqueous fluid inclusions typically enclose up to 1 mol% N2, which is not present in non-aqueous fluid inclusions. Instead, non-aqueous fluid inclusions additionally contain small amounts of CH4 (<2 mol%) (Fig. 3; Table 1).
Fluid inclusion microthermometry
Aqueous fluid inclusions typically reveal liquid compositions ranging from pure water to more saline solutions with 14 wt% NaCl-equivalents. Higher salinities of up to 25 wt% NaCl-equivalents are rare. The corresponding ice melting temperatures vary between 0 °C and −26 °C (peak at −7 °C; Supplementary Fig. 1). Aqueous fluid inclusions form clathrates upon freezing and subsequent melting between 7 °C (pure CO2) and 20 °C (H2S-rich). Total homogenisation temperatures [Th (total)], describing the minimum temperature of fluid entrapment, range from 100 to 195 °C, with a maximum between 110 and 150 °C (Supplementary Fig. 1). Most fluid inclusions decrepitate at temperatures >230 °C.
Non-aqueous fluid inclusions show Th (CO2-H2S) between 16 and 38 °C (Supplementary Fig. 1). Those containing higher concentrations of H2S typically homogenise at the higher end of this range, that is, above the critical temperature of CO2 (31.1 °C). Phases usually homogenise to liquid, and only rarely to the gas or critical phase. During cooling runs, the subsequent melting of solid CO2 and H2S can be observed at lower temperatures compared to the pure compounds (−56.6 °C and −83.6 °C, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Our data demonstrate that the majority of aqueous and non-aqueous inclusions formed during crystal growth (i.e. primary inclusions). Thus, fluids must have been immiscible at the time of encapsulation, and experienced identical trapping and homogenisation temperatures (i.e. heterogeneous trapping). Therefore, no pressure correction is necessary.
Thermal decrepitation/desorption (TD) GC–MS
Online analyses of black barite fragments using TD-GC–MS yielded high amounts of CO2, H2S, and H2O, thus confirming results from Raman analysis on fluid inclusions (Fig. 4, Table 1). Furthermore, COS, CS2, SO2, together with various organic molecules containing oxygen (aldehydes, ketones, acetic acid, oxolane) and sulfur (thiophene, thiols) were detected, accompanied by minor amounts of benzene (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 2, Table 2). The diversity and intensity of compounds was considerably higher in the 250 °C than in the 150 °C experiment (Table 2). This finding is consistent with the microthermometry data revealing that most fluid inclusions remain intact up to ~230 °C.
Table 2.
Rel. abundance TD [%]c | Rel. abundance SPME [%]c | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peak label | Compound | Level of confidencea | Chemical formula | Key ions (m/z) | RTb | 150 °C | 250 °C | Median | SD |
CO2 | Carbon dioxide | 2 | CO2 | 44 | 9.27* | High | High | ||
H2S | Hydrogen sulfide | 2 | H2S | 34 | 12.09* | High | High | ||
COS | Carbonyl sulfide | 2 | COS | 60 | 11.51 | 24.48 | 4.56 | 4.59 | 1.41 |
H2O | Water | 2 | H2O | 18 | 12.93* | High | High | high | 0,00 |
SO2 | Sulfur dioxide | 2 | SO2 | 48, 64 | 15.51 | 14.31 | |||
Ea | Ethanal | 2 | C2H4O | 44 | 15.58 | 1.40 | 1.91 | 1.75 | |
MT | Methanethiol | 2 | CH4S | 48 | 15.70 | 7.80 | 5.04 | 3.97 | 0.46 |
Bu | But-1-ene | 1 | C4H8 | 56 | 16.21 | tr | 1.84 | tr | |
Eo | Ethanol | 3 | C2H6O | 45 | 17.26 | tr | tr | ||
Pa | Prop-2-enal | 2 | C3H4O | 56 | 17.55 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
CS2 | Methanedithione | 2 | CS2 | 76 | 17.63 | 43.20 | 45.80 | 9.08 | 1.63 |
Pa' | Propanal | 3 | C3H6O | 58 | 17.68 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 0.42 | |
ET | Ethanethiol | 2 | C2H6S | 29, 47, 62 | 17.70 | tr | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.27 |
MSM | (Methylsulfanyl)methane | 2 | C2H6S | 47, 62 | 17.79 | tr | 0.13 | 1.56 | 0.49 |
Po | Propan-2-one | 2 | C3H6O | 43, 58 | 17.84 | 3.89 | 1.87 | 7.28 | 2.48 |
Ba | But-2-enal | 3 | C4H6O | 70 | 18.46 | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.00 | |
Ox | Oxolaned | 2 | C4H8O | 72 | 19.27 | tr | 11.28 | 4.71 | 3.64 |
Bo | Butan-2-one | 3 | C4H8O | 72 | 19.38 | tr | 3.06 | 1.23 | |
Hex | n-Hexane (RT standard) | C6H14 | 19.68 | ||||||
TP | Thiophene | 2 | C4H4S | 84 | 19.89 | tr | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.04 |
B | Benzene | 2 | C6H6 | 78 | 19.97 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.33 | |
Ac | Acetic acid | 3 | C2H4O2 | 60 | 20.10 | 20.63 | 8.89 | 1.71 | 0.29 |
MB | 3-methylbutan-2-one | 3 | C5H10O | 86 | 20.44 | 0.69 | 0.00 | ||
Mxp | 1-Methoxypropan-2-ol | 3 | C4H10O2 | 45,47 | 20.72 | 4.01 | 0.00 | ||
Pe | Pentanal | 3 | C5H10O | 44,58 | 20.73 | tr | |||
MDSM | (Methyldisulfanyl)methane | 2 | C2H6S2 | 94 | 20.91 | 7.70 | 3.58 | ||
To | Toluene | 2 | C7H8 | 91 | 21.36 | 4.05 | 1.08 | ||
TL | Thiolane | 2 | C4H8S | 60, 88 | 21.41 | 1.20 | |||
MP | 4-Methylpentan-2-one | 3 | C6H12O | 43, 58, 85 > 100 | 21.63 | 5.23 | 0.90 | ||
Ha | Hexanal | 3 | C6H12O | 56, 82 | 22.17 | 2.53 | 0.15 | ||
MEDS | (Methyldisulfanyl)ethane | 2 | C3H8S2 | 108 | 22.34 | 1.31 | 0.38 | ||
Xy I | p-Xylene | 2 | C8H10 | 91, 106 | 22.91 | tr | |||
Xy II | m-Xylene | 2 | C8H10 | 91, 106 | 22.99 | 1.04 | 0.32 | ||
Pac | 1-Methoxyprop-2-yl acetate | 1 | C6H12O3 | 72, 87 | 23.19 | 1.15 | 0.06 | ||
Xy III | o-Xylene | 2 | C8H10 | 91, 106 | 23.37 | tr | |||
Sty | Styrene | 1 | C8H8 | 91, 104 | 23.41 | tr | |||
CH | Cyclohexanone | 3 | C6H10O | 98 | 23.66 | 1.97 | 1.28 | ||
Hp | Heptanal | 3 | C7H14O | 55, 70 | 24.27 | 1.09 | 0.07 | ||
BA | Benzaldehyde | 2 | C7H6O | 77, 106 | 25.09 | 0.89 | 16.23 | 3.78 | |
MTSM | (Methyltrisulfanyl)methane | 2 | C2H6S3 | 126 | 25.18 | 11.44 | 7.07 | ||
TMB I | 1,3,5-Trimethyl benzene | 1 | C9H12 | 105, 120 | 25.23 | tr | |||
TMB II | 1,2,4-Trimethyl benzene | 2 | C9H12 | 105, 120 | 25.35 | tr | |||
MH | 6-Methylheptan-3-one | 1 | C8H16O | 72, 99 | 25.95 | 2.03 | 0.00 | ||
TMB III | 1,2,3-Trimethyl benzene | 2 | C9H12 | 105, 120 | 26.04 | 2.03 | 0.68 |
See also Supplementary Fig. 2 for molecular structures.
RT retention time, TD thermal decrepitation/desorption, SPME solid phase micro extraction, SD standard deviation, tr traces.
aLevel of confidence: 3 = verified by standard, 2 = clear identification with reference spectra, 1 = tentative identification.
bRT marked by asterisks (*) are from TD-GC–MS analysis, other RT from SPME-GC–MS experiments. From 15 min RT in both methods are similar.
cCompounds present in traces (tr) and main components (CO2, H2S, H2O) were not included in relative abundance calculations.
dSmall amounts of oxolane were identified in SPME-GC–MS blanks (see Supplementary Fig. 4).
Solid phase micro extraction (SPME) GC–MS
Offline analysis using SPME-GC–MS revealed numerous organic molecules containing oxygen (aldehydes, ketones, acetic acid, oxolane) and/or sulfur (thiophene, thiols, organic polysulfanes), along with some aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. benzene, alkylbenzenes; Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 2, Table 2). Compounds detected with both analytical techniques showed a lower abundance in SPME-GC–MS as compared to TD-GC–MS at 250 °C. On the other hand, SPME-GC–MS yielded a considerably greater diversity of compounds, especially in the higher molecular weight range (Figs. 4, 5). The absence of CO2 and H2S in the SPME-GC–MS runs is due to an analytical bias, as these compounds do not adsorb onto the SPME fibre.
Organic carbon content and stable isotopes (C, O)
The mean total organic carbon (TOC) content of the black barite is 0.31 wt % (N = 5; standard deviation 0.002). Stable carbon isotope analysis revealed a mean δ13CTOC value of −27.6 ± 0.6 ‰. Offline analysis revealed δ13CCO2 and δ18OCO2 values of −10.0 ± 0.3 ‰ and 34.1 ± 0.6 ‰, respectively. Online analyses yielded δ13CCO2 values ranging from −14.3 to −8.9 ± 0.3 ‰ for black barites (mean = –10.3 ‰) and from −8.6 to −4.0 ± 0.3 ‰ for grey barites (mean = −6.3 ‰). Thus, black barites are consistently more depleted in 13C than their grey counterparts (Fig. 6). In all cases, CH4 and N2 contents were too low for stable isotope analyses (<2 mol %).
Discussion
Data integrity
Black barites studied here classify as primary hydrothermal sediments that precipitated from discharging fluids. This interpretation is additionally supported by the facts that (i) the originally sulfidic17,40 stromatolite interbeds are still largely intact and show no indications for a progressive replacement by barite (Fig. 1b, c) and (ii) that the barite does not contain relicts of potential precursor materials (Fig. 2). Our observations are therefore consistent with earlier studies that argued for a primary, synsedimentary origin of the Dresser barites analysed herein (i.e. precipitation in surface environments linked to hydrothermal activity)10,16,32,41,42.
Barite is highly chemically stable under a wide range of geological conditions38,39. Hence, barite-hosted fluid inclusions can preserve information on the original composition of hydrothermal fluids. The black and grey barites from the Dresser Formation primarily grew as coarse crystals and contain abundant primary fluid inclusions (see also refs. 17,32,39). Most fluid inclusions show no indication of post-entrapment modification. The results are reproducible and Th values [100–195 °C for Th (total)] are internally consistent for different coevolutionary fluid inclusions. The measured Th is in line with (i) formation temperatures estimated for coexisting cherts (100–200 °C)26, (ii) other reported Th from fluid inclusions in Dresser barites and cherts (110–365 °C)32, and (iii) maximum formation temperatures of barite-hosted fluid inclusions in a modern hydrothermal system (JADE hydrothermal field, 150–200 °C)43.
The aqueous and non-aqueous fluid inclusions distinguished herein appear to include those described in earlier studies32,33. Particularly key-characteristics such as sizes (5–30 µm), ice and clathrate melting temperatures (−7.5 to −0.6 °C and −0.9 to 19.2 °C, respectively), and the fundamental volatile inventories (CO2, H2O, H2S, CH4) are all remarkably similar. A notable exception is the presence of trace amounts of N2 in some of the aqueous fluid inclusions (Table 1, Fig. 3), which has not been reported previously.
The presence of aqueous and non-aqueous fluid inclusions (Fig. 3; Table 1) can be explained by the presence of two coexisting fluids at the time of trapping as a result of phase separation from boiling fluids during cooling (effervescence)34. Hence, the major fluid composition of the black barites can be considered primary. However, there are indications that a few fluid inclusions were locally modified immediately after emplacement (e.g. necking down after crystallization34), explaining the wide variations observed in Th (total). This information is not relevant to the interpretation of the fluids as being primary, because they would be trapped again instantly with their overall composition remaining unchanged.
Organic molecules detected by GC–MS are derived from the fluid inclusions as evidenced by (i) clean pre-analysis blanks, (ii) retrieval of products exclusively after grinding of barite, (iii) reproducibility of the results from five TD-GC–MS and seven SPME-GC–MS experiments, (iv) presence of highly volatile compounds in GC–MS analyses, (v) consistency of data obtained by independent analytical techniques (Raman spectroscopy vs. GC–MS), (vi) temperature dependency of product yields, meaning that higher temperature analyses above the decrepitation temperature of fluid inclusions result in higher abundances (TD-GC–MS 150 °C vs. TD-GC–MS 250 °C), and (vii) absence of molecular contamination indications. Together, these multiple lines of evidence strongly suggest that the analysed compounds derived from the fluid inclusions, while a minor contribution of organic compounds from the rock matrix cannot entirely be ruled out. This result adds to earlier studies, which demonstrated that fluid inclusions form closed systems that can preserve molecules even in billion-year-old metamorphic rocks36,37,44,45.
Organic molecules detected by TD-GC–MS and SPME-GC–MS display major differences in diversity and abundance (compare Figs. 4 and 5). SPME probably provides a more authentic picture of the compounds contained in the fluid inclusions, because no heating to >50 °C is applied before GC–MS analysis. In contrast, TD resulted in abundant SO2 formation during heating to higher temperatures (Table 2, 250 °C experiment), reflecting thermally driven artefact formation by reaction of the components in the interior of the fluid inclusions. Additionally, and even more important, the mild SPME offline approach can be applied on much greater sample amounts (g vs. mg), resulting in detectable yields of trace compounds that are indiscernible with the TD approach.
Nature and origin of fluids
The Dresser Formation formed in a hydrothermal environment16,17. Hence, compounds entrapped in barite-hosted fluid inclusions may have been derived from abiotic sources. Indeed, gaseous compounds such as SO2, CO2, H2S, COS, CS2, and (methylsulfanyl)methane are known to be delivered to surface environments via volcanic outgassing46,47. Functionalized lipid-like organic molecules such as ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and alcohols can be formed by Fischer–Tropsch-type processes under hydrothermal conditions6–9. Further compounds of possibly abiotic origin are acetic acid and organic sulfur molecules (e.g. thiols, organic polysulfanes). These molecules may be synthesized in the presence of sulfide catalysts15 and with CS2 or CO2 as a carbon source48,49. Extraterrestrial delivery by meteorites could have provided an additional source for many of the observed compounds (e.g. COS, CS2, H2S, methanethiol, benzaldehyde, acetic acid, benzene, toluene, various aldehydes, and ketones)2,3,50–52.
While many compounds observed in the barite-hosted fluid inclusions from the Dresser Formation are consistent with an abiotic origin, the Dresser Formation also contains a variety of evidence for life1,10,17,20–25,27,29. Thus, biology is another potential source for the observed compounds. In fact, organisms synthesise most lipids on modern Earth, and δ13C signatures of kerogen in the black barite (c. –28 ‰) are in good accordance with biological carbon fixation53. Furthermore, compounds such as H2S, COS, CS2, (methylsulfanyl)methane, (methyldisulfanyl)methane, and thiols are typically formed during microbial sulfur cycling in modern environments54–57, and there is isotopic evidence for the presence of sulfur-processing metabolisms during Dresser times24,25,27.
Taken together, it is likely that the barite-hosted fluid inclusions contain mixtures of various abiotic and biotic compounds. Such contributions from different sources would plausibly explain the contrasting δ13C signatures of CO2 in grey and black barites (Fig. 6). CO2 released from grey barites exhibits a mean δ13C value of –6.3 ‰, which might be indicative of a magmatic source (typically between −2 and −8 ‰58–60). In contrast, lower δ13C values of −10.3 ‰ in CO2 from black barites might fingerprint a biomass-derived carbon component that had been converted to CO2 via bacterial and/or thermochemical sulfate reduction61,62 before it was absorbed and transported by fluids. The processing, re-distribution, and mixing of fluids from different sources17,32 is well known from modern and ancient hydrothermal systems (hydrothermal pump1,63).
Ingredients for early life in 3.5 Ga old fluid inclusions
It is widely assumed that hydrothermal processes fuelled primeval life on Earth13,16, but it is difficult to pinpoint the exact nature of such relationships in the Archaean rock record. The fluid inclusion-bearing black barites are interbedded with stromatolites (Fig. 1b, c; see also refs. 17,21), suggesting that hydrothermal fluids may have influenced the ancient microbial communities40. Indeed, many compounds discovered in the barite-hosted fluid inclusions (e.g. COS, CS2, acetic acid, (methylsulfanyl)methane, (methyldisulfanyl)methane, thiols, CH4; Figs. 4, 5) would have provided ideal substrates for the sulfur-based and methanogenic microbes previously proposed as players in the Dresser environment24,25,27,29,40,54,55,57,64–66. For instance, acetic acid may have fuelled acetoclastic methanogenesis, while organic sulfides such as methanethiol and (methylsulfanyl)methane might have served as substrates for fermenting methanogenic bacteria67. This hypothesis is in full agreement with isotopic evidence indicating the existence of methanogenic and sulfur-cycling microbes in Dresser environments24,27,29,40. The activity of sulfate reducing or sulfur disproportioning bacteria could also account for the presence of abundant pyrite in the originally sulfidised Dresser stromatolites21,24,27,40,68. Thus, our findings provide a strong clue that microbial life associated with the black barites of the Dresser Formation was (partly at least) fuelled by hydrothermal fluid flow.
In addition to potential nutrients and/or substrates, hydrothermal fluids captured in the Dresser fluid inclusions contain molecules closely related to putative key agents in the emergence of life. It has been proposed that CO and methanethiol can react in the presence of catalytic metallic sulfides to methyl thioacetate15. This compound, also known as activated acetic acid, was proposed as being important for the formation of lipids under primordial conditions and as an energy source for early microbial metabolisms13,69. Whereas this highly energetic molecule is readily hydrolysed70 and cannot be preserved over geological time, our data evidence the presence of its stable building blocks, methanethiol and acetic acid, in the Dresser fluids (Figs. 4, 5). In other words, essential ingredients of methyl thioacetate, a proposed critical agent in the emergence of life, were available in the Dresser environments.
Our data provide the first detailed picture of the organic composition of primordial fluids that had evidently been available for the ancient microbes c. 3.5 Ga ago. These fluids delivered ample catabolic substrates for chemoheterotrophic metabolisms. In addition, they might have conveyed the building blocks for chemoautotrophic carbon fixation and, thus, anabolic uptake of carbon into biomass. Taken together, our data strongly support the idea that hydrothermal fluids supplied a fertile substrate for early microbial life on Earth.
Methods
Sampling and sample preparation
Black barite was sampled from a freshly exposed cut wall in the Dresser mine (Pilbara Craton, Western Australia; 21° 09ˈ 05.2ˈˈ S, 119° 26ˈ 15.3ˈˈ E; Fig. 1). Fresh grey and white barite samples were collected in the immediate surroundings of the Dresser mine and analysed for comparison. During the sampling procedure disposable nitrile gloves were worn. Individual samples were taken using a carefully pre-cleaned geological hammer and chisel. Only large pieces (>10 cm) that were devoid of any weathering features down to the hand-lens scale (e.g. cracks and fractures, biological surface colonization) were selected. Immediately after recovery, all samples were wrapped in 2 layers of baked aluminium foil.
In the laboratory, all glassware and other materials were heated (550 °C for 3 h) and/or extensively rinsed with purified organic solvents such as acetone. Solvent cleanliness is regularly checked as part of the lab routine.
The surfaces of all samples (≥1.5 cm) were removed with an acetone-cleaned saw to eliminate potential contamination sources that are not necessarily visible with a hand-lens (e.g. hypoliths and endoliths). The cut surfaces were used for the preparation of petrographic thin sections. The resulting interior parts were extensively rinsed with acetone and immediately further processed for geochemical bulk analyses and fluid inclusion studies.
Petrography and bulk analyses
Detailed petrographic analyses were conducted on thin sections of all samples using a Zeiss SteREO Discovery.V8 stereo microscope linked to an AxioCam MRc5 5-megapixel camera. A subset of well-preserved samples that contained organic matter was subsequently analysed by all other methods.
Total organic carbon (TOC) contents were determined with a Leco RC612 multiphase carbon/hydrogen analyser, where carbon was measured as CO2 with an infrared detector. Prior to analysis, barite was finely ground (≤50 µm) in a swing mill (MM 400, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). A significant contribution of CO2 from fluid inclusions to the TOC value is unlikely because most volatiles were released during grinding.
Fluid inclusion microanalyses
Fluid inclusions analyses were conducted on doubly polished thick sections (150–200 μm) from the interior parts of the samples.
Microthermometry measurements were performed with a Linkam THM 600 heating-freezing stage coupled to a video system (PixeLINK PL-A662, 1,3 MPixel). The stage was calibrated by using a set of synthetic fluid inclusions standards. Recorded phase transitions included (i) final melting temperatures of various solid materials (CO2, H2S, ice, clathrate), (ii) partial homogenisation temperatures (Th) of non-aqueous phases into aqueous or vapor phases, and (iii) total homogenisation temperatures of phases into the liquid phase [Th (total)].
Raman analysis of fluid inclusions contents was performed with a Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRam-HR 800 Raman spectrometer equipped with a 488 nm laser.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS)
Online (thermal decrepitation/desorption, TD) and offline (solid phase micro extraction, SPME) GC–MS analyses were conducted using a Varian CP-3800 GC coupled to a Varian 1200 L MS.
All mechanical tools used for sample preparation were heat-cleaned immediately before use by using a micro-torch. The cleanliness of the GC–MS system, SPME fibre, and grinding jar were assured by extensive blank analyses (see description of online and offline GC–MS analyses below). Sample runs were only performed after the immediately preceding blank chromatogram proved clean of contaminants and/or carryover products. In few instances, trace compounds were observed in pre- and post-analysis runs due to carryover (Supplementary Figs. 3, 4). These compounds occur only in insignificant amounts and thus can be neglected. Due to previous long-term use of the GC for extract-based analyses, solvent-derived n-hexane consistently occurred in all runs, including blanks, and was eventually utilised as an internal retention time standard. White barite, being virtually devoid of organic matter, was analysed as a negative control to recognize organic volatiles from other sources, and laboratory contamination (Supplementary Fig. 5). The white barite samples were prepared and analysed in the same way as black barite samples.
For online analysis with TD-GC–MS, the Varian 1079 temperature-programmable injector of the GC–MS was equipped with a Varian ChromatoProbe adapter, which permits a direct introduction of micro vials loaded with sample material. This technique reduces the risk of contamination by rendering chemical preparation steps unnecessary. A further advantage is that only small sample amounts are required (10−2 g range). Thin stromatolite interlayers (Fig. 1b, c) were carefully removed from the barite by using a laboratory hammer and chisel. The resulting isolated, millimetre- to centimetre-sized barite pieces were crushed with a mortar and pestle, until a grain size of roughly one millimetre was reached.
The barite grains were filled into a sample micro vial (glass; inner diameter: 1.9 mm; length: 12 mm). Using the ChromatoProbe device, the vial was directly loaded into the warm (60 °C) GC injector. To allow desorption and venting of adsorbed gases, the starting temperature was hold for 6 min at a split ratio of 50. To initiate thermal decrepitation of fluid inclusions, the GC injector was heated from 60 °C to a maximum of 250 °C at 200 °C/min and held for 3 min. Between 6 and 9.95 min, the split valve was closed to enable optimal transfer of target compounds to the GC-column. Thereafter, the split was set back to 50. Analyses of empty micro vials immediately before sample runs served as blanks to ensure cleanliness of the system.
The GC was equipped with a HP-PLOT/Q + PT fused silica capillary column coupled to a Duraguard pre-column (lengths: 30 m + 5 m, respectively; inner diameter: 0.32 mm; film thickness: 20 µm). The GC oven temperature was initially kept at 30 °C (isothermal for 9.95 min), then ramped to 250 °C (isothermal for 5 min) at 20 °C/min. Helium was used as carrier gas at a constant flow of 4 mL/min. Electron ionization mass spectra were recorded in full scan mode (m/z 10–200) using a scan time of 0.5 s and electron energy of 70 eV.
Offline analysis with SPME-GC–MS involved the adsorption of volatiles contained in fluid inclusions onto a SPME fibre, followed by the subsequent injection into the GC–MS. To open the fluid inclusions, we used a custom-designed gas-tight grinding jar equipped with a septum port and a zircon milling ball (Supplementary Fig. 6). Prior to each experiment, the grinding jar was cleaned by (i) milling with combusted (550 °C, >3 h) sand for 3 × 3 min in a swing mill (MM 400, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany), (ii) subsequent rinsing with Millipore water, and (iii) drying at 100 °C for 2 h. Approximately 4 g of millimetre- to centimetre-sized barite fragments were prepared as described above and loaded into the cooled jar. The jar was subsequently closed, heated to 60 °C, and purged with He via the septum port for a minimum of 2 h. This ensures that any residual air and other potentially desorbed volatile compounds will be expelled from uncrushed sample surfaces. The jar was then fitted into the swing mill, and the contained fluid inclusions were opened by shaking with the zircon ball for 6 min (13 Hz) at room temperature. A pre-heated (30 min at 270 °C) and activated divinylbenzene/carboxen™/polydimethylsiloxane SPME fibre was inserted into the headspace of the jar through the septum port. Volatiles released from the fluid inclusions were allowed to adsorb onto the SPME fibre for 30 min at 50 °C (Supplementary Fig. 6).
After retraction from the jar, the syringe containing the SPME fibre was immediately placed into the GC injector to avoid airborne contamination. The GC injector temperature was kept at 250 °C, using a split ratio of 50. Upon insertion of the SPME fibre, the split valve was closed and reset to 50 after 5.1 min. The GC oven temperature was initially held at 30 °C (isothermal for 9.95 min), then ramped to 250 °C at 20 °C/min (isothermal for 10 min). MS parameters were as given above, except that the scan range was narrowed to m/z 10–150.
To keep track of potential external contamination, a sequence of tests was performed prior to each sample run: (i) GC–MS blank run with no injection, (ii) GC–MS analysis of the pre-conditioned SPME fibre, (iii) SPME-GC–MS analysis of cleaned but unloaded jar, and (iv) SPME-GC–MS analysis of loaded and helium-purged jar prior to sample crushing (Supplementary Fig. 4). SPME-GC–MS analysis of crushed barite samples was only conducted if all four blanks proved clean.
Compounds were identified by comparing them to reference spectra (NIST mass spectral library) and commercially available standards (see Table 2). In case of alkylbenzenes, the elution order of isomers was additionally used for identification. Relative compound abundances were calculated separately for TD-GC–MS (150 °C, 250 °C) and SPME-GC–MS analysis. The main components (H2O, CO2, H2S) and trace compounds were not included in these calculations. The relative abundances of most compounds vary only slightly between replicate measurements (Table 2).
Isotope geochemistry
Stable carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios are reported as delta values (δ) in parts per thousand (‰) relative to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) and Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW), respectively.
The stable carbon isotope composition of bulk organic matter (δ13CTOC) was analysed at the Competence Center for Stable Isotope Analyses at the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany. About 11 mg of powdered and decalcified (with HCl) sample material was measured with an elemental analyser (Na-2500 CE-instruments) coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Finnigan MAT Delta Plus). Each sample was analysed twice to monitor reproducibility. Duplicate δ13CTOC values are within 1.1 ‰ of each other. Acetanilide (δ13C = −29.6 ‰) was used for internal calibration of the instrument.
The stable carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of fluid inclusion-contained CO2 (δ13CCO2 and δ18OCO2, respectively) was analysed using offline and online approaches. For offline analyses, samples were prepared as for SPME-GC–MS analysis. Volatiles released through grinding were retrieved from the grinding jar using a gas-tight syringe. The CO2 was then cryogenically purified and analysed using a Finnigan DeltaPlus MS. For online analyses, a sample crusher was connected upstream of a gas chromatograph coupled to an NC2500 elemental analyser (Carlo Erba, Italy) and a DELTAplusXL continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany)71. A volume of c. 2 cm3 of barite was crushed for each analysis.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Jakub Surma, Birgit Röring, Cornelia Conradt, Andreas Reimer, and Jens Dyckmans for technical and analytical support. This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG grants DU 1450/4-1; DFG Priority Programme (SPP) 1833 “Building a Habitable Earth”: DU 1450/3-1, DU 1450/3-2, TH 713/13-2, RE 665/42-2). This is publication number 10 of the Early Life Working Group (Department of Geobiology, University of Göttingen; Göttingen Academy of Sciences and Humanities).
Author contributions
H.M. and V.T. conceptualized the study. H.M., J.-P.D., and J.R. performed field work and sampling. J.R. conducted petrographic analysis. A.v.d.K. carried out microthermometry and fluid inclusion microanalysis with Raman and CL. H.M. and V.T. designed and conducted the GC–MS experiments. A.P. and V.L. performed CO2 stable isotope analysis. All authors contributed to discussion of results and writing.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
All relevant data to support the findings are provided in the paper (results section; Figs. 1–6) and the supplementary information (Supplementary Figs. 1, 3–5). GC–MS raw data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Simon George and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-21323-z.
References
- 1.Duda JP, et al. Ideas and perspectives: hydrothermally driven redistribution and sequestration of early Archaean biomass – the “hydrothermal pump hypothesis”. Biogeosciences. 2018;15:1535–1548. doi: 10.5194/bg-15-1535-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sephton MA. Organic compounds in carbonaceous meteorites. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002;19:292–311. doi: 10.1039/b103775g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chyba C, Sagan C. Endogenous production, exogenous delivery and impact-shock synthesis of organic molecules: an inventory for the origins of life. Nature. 1992;355:125–132. doi: 10.1038/355125a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miller SL. A production of amino acids under possible primitive earth conditions. Science. 1953;117:528–529. doi: 10.1126/science.117.3046.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnson AP, et al. The Miller volcanic spark discharge experiment. Science. 2008;322:404–404. doi: 10.1126/science.1161527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McCollom TM, Ritter G, Simoneit BRT. Lipid synthesis under hydrothermal conditions by Fischer-Tropsch-type reactions. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1999;29:153–166. doi: 10.1023/A:1006592502746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McCollom TM, Seewald JS. Abiotic synthesis of organic compounds in deep-sea hydrothermal environments. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:382–401. doi: 10.1021/cr0503660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mißbach H, et al. Assessing the diversity of lipids formed via Fischer-Tropsch-type reactions. Org. Geochem. 2018;119:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rushdi AI, Simoneit BRT. Lipid formation by aqueous Fischer-Tropsch-type synthesis over a temperature range of 100 to 400 °C. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 2001;31:103–118. doi: 10.1023/A:1006702503954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Djokic T, Van Kranendonk MJ, Campbell KA, Walter MR, Ward CR. Earliest signs of life on land preserved in ca. 3.5 Ga hot spring deposits. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15263. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Damer B, Deamer D. The hot spring hypothesis for an origin of life. Astrobiology. 2020;20:429–452. doi: 10.1089/ast.2019.2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Deamer D, Damer B, Kompanichenko V. Hydrothermal chemistry and the origin of cellular life. Astrobiology. 2019;19:1523–1537. doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martin W, Baross J, Kelley D, Russell MJ. Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;6:805–814. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wächtershäuser G. Before enzymes and templates: theory of surface metabolism. Microbiol. Rev. 1988;52:452–484. doi: 10.1128/MR.52.4.452-484.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huber C, Wächtershäuser G. Activated acetic acid by carbon fixation on (Fe,Ni)S under primordial conditions. Science. 1997;276:245–247. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5310.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Van Kranendonk MJ. Volcanic degassing, hydrothermal circulation and the flourishing of early life on Earth: a review of the evidence from c. 3490-3240 Ma rocks of the Pilbara Supergroup, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia. Earth Sci. Rev. 2006;74:197–240. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Van Kranendonk MJ, Philippot P, Lepot K, Bodorkos S, Pirajno F. Geological setting of Earth’s oldest fossils in the ca. 3.5 Ga Dresser Formation, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia. Precambr. Res. 2008;167:93–124. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hickman AH. Geology of the Pilbara Block and its environs. West. Aust. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1983;127:1–268. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Terabayashi M, Masada Y, Ozawa H. Archean ocean-floor metamorphism in the North Pole area, Pilbara Craton, Western Australia. Precambr. Res. 2003;127:167–180. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00186-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Walter MR, Buick R, Dunlop JSR. Stromatolites 3,400–3,500 Myr old from the North Pole area, Western Australia. Nature. 1980;284:443–445. doi: 10.1038/284443a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baumgartner RJ, et al. Nano–porous pyrite and organic matter in 3.5-billion-year-old stromatolites record primordial life. Geology. 2019;47:1039–1043. doi: 10.1130/G46365.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Glikson M, et al. Microbial remains in some earliest Earth rocks: comparison with a potential modern analogue. Precambr. Res. 2008;164:187–200. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morag N, et al. Microstructure-specific carbon isotopic signatures of organic matter from ∼3.5 Ga cherts of the Pilbara Craton support a biologic origin. Precambr. Res. 2016;275:429–449. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shen Y, Buick R, Canfield DE. Isotopic evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early Archaean era. Nature. 2001;410:77–81. doi: 10.1038/35065071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shen Y, Farquhar J, Masterson A, Kaufman AJ, Buick R. Evaluating the role of microbial sulfate reduction in the early Archean using quadruple isotope systematics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2009;279:383–391. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ueno Y, Yoshioka H, Maruyama S, Isozaki Y. Carbon isotopes and petrography of kerogens in ∼3.5-Ga hydrothermal silica dikes in the North Pole area, Western Australia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2004;68:573–589. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00462-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Philippot P, et al. Early Archaean microorganisms preferred elemental sulfur, not sulfate. Science. 2007;317:1534–1537. doi: 10.1126/science.1145861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Buick R, Dunlop JSR. Evaporitic sediments of Early Archaean age from the Warrawoona Group, North Pole, Western Australia. Sedimentology. 1990;37:247–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1990.tb00958.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ueno Y, Yamada K, Yoshida N, Maruyama S, Isozaki Y. Evidence from fluid inclusions for microbial methanogenesis in the early Archaean era. Nature. 2006;440:516–519. doi: 10.1038/nature04584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Foriel J, et al. Biological control of Cl/Br and low sulfate concentration in a 3.5-Gyr-old seawater from North Pole, Western Australia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004;228:451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marty B, Avice G, Bekaert DV, Broadley MW. Salinity of the Archaean oceans from analysis of fluid inclusions in quartz. Comptes Rendus Geosci. 2018;350:154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2017.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Harris AC, et al. Early Archean hot springs above epithermal veins, North Pole, Western Australia: new insights from fluid inclusion microanalysis. Econ. Geol. 2009;104:793–814. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.104.6.793. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rankin AH, Shepherd TJ. H2S-bearing fluid inclusions in baryte from the North Pole deposit, Western Australia. Mineral. Mag. 1978;42:408–410. doi: 10.1180/minmag.1978.042.323.16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roedder, E. Fluid inclusions: Reviews in mineralogy 12 (Mineralogical Society of America, 1984).
- 35.George SC, Jardine DR. Ketones in a Proterozoic dolerite sill. Org. Geochem. 1994;21:829–839. doi: 10.1016/0146-6380(94)90042-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dutkiewicz A, Rasmussen B, Buick R. Oil preserved in fluid inclusions in Archaean sandstones. Nature. 1998;395:885–888. doi: 10.1038/27644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.George SC, Volk H, Dutkiewicz A, Ridley J, Buick R. Preservation of hydrocarbons and biomarkers in oil trapped inside fluid inclusions for >2 billion years. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2008;72:844–870. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hanor JS. Barite–celestine geochemistry and environments of formation. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2000;40:193–275. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2000.40.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Griffith EM, Paytan A. Barite in the ocean—occurrence, geochemistry and palaeoceanographic applications. Sedimentology. 2012;59:1817–1835. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01327.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baumgartner RJ, et al. Sulfidization of 3.48 billion-year-old stromatolites of the Dresser Formation, Pilbara Craton: constraints from in-situ sulfur isotope analysis of pyrite. Chem. Geol. 2020;538:119488. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119488. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Van Kranendonk MJ, Pirajno F. Geochemistry of metabasalts and hydrothermal alteration zones associated with c. 3.45 Ga chert and barite deposits: implications for the geological setting of the Warrawoona Group, Pilbara Craton, Australia. Geochemistry. 2004;4:253–278. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nijman W, de Bruijne KH, Valkering ME. Growth fault control of Early Archaean cherts, barite mounds and chert-barite veins, North Pole Dome, Eastern Pilbara, Western Australia. Precambr. Res. 1998;88:25–52. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00062-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lüders V, Pracejus B, Halbach P. Fluid inclusion and sulfur isotope studies in probable modern analogue Kuroko-type ores from the JADE hydrothermal field (Central Okinawa Trough, Japan) Chem. Geol. 2001;173:45–58. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00267-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hoffmann CF, Henley RW, Higgins NC, Solomon M, Summons RE. Biogenic hydrocarbons in fluid inclusions from the aberfoyle tin-tungsten deposit, Tasmania, Australia. Chem. Geol. 1988;70:287–299. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(88)90120-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Price LC. Thermal stability of hydrocarbons in nature: limits, evidence, characteristics, and possible controls. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1993;57:3261–3280. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90539-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chin M, Davis DD. Global sources and sinks of OCS and CS2 and their distributions. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles. 1993;7:321–337. doi: 10.1029/93GB00568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Watts SF. The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and hydrogen sulfide. Atmos. Environ. 2000;34:761–779. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00342-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rushdi AI, Simoneit BRT. Abiotic synthesis of organic compounds from carbon disulfide under hydrothermal conditions. Astrobiology. 2005;5:749–769. doi: 10.1089/ast.2005.5.749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Heinen W, Lauwers AM. Organic sulfur compounds resulting from the interaction of iron sulfide, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in an anaerobic aqueous environment. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1996;26:131–150. doi: 10.1007/BF01809852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Flynn GJ. The delivery of organic matter from asteroids and comets to the early surface of Mars. Earth Moon Planets. 1996;72:469–474. doi: 10.1007/BF00117551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Llorca J. Organic matter in comets and cometary dust. Int. Microbiol. 2005;8:5–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pizzarello S. The chemistry of life’s origin: a carbonaceous meteorite perspective. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006;39:231–237. doi: 10.1021/ar050049f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schidlowski M. Carbon isotopes as biogeochemical recorders of life over 3.8 Ga of Earth history: evolution of a concept. Precambr. Res. 2001;106:117–134. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00128-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lomans BP, van der Drift C, Pol A, Op den Camp HJM. Microbial cycling of volatile organic sulfur compounds. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002;59:575–588. doi: 10.1007/s00018-002-8450-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.van Gemerden H. Microbial mats: a joint venture. Mar. Geol. 1993;113:3–25. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(93)90146-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kelly DP, Baker SC. The organosulphur cycle: aerobic and anaerobic processes leading to turnover of C1-sulphur compounds. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1990;7:241–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04919.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kiene RP, Capone DG. Microbial transformations of methylated sulfur compounds in anoxic salt marsh sediments. Microb. Ecol. 1988;15:275–291. doi: 10.1007/BF02012642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gerlach TM, Taylor BE. Carbon isotope constraints on degassing of carbon dioxide from Kilauea Volcano. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1990;54:2051–2058. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90270-U. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sano Y, Marty B. Origin of carbon in fumarolic gas from island arcs. Chem. Geol. 1995;119:265–274. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00097-R. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Javoy M, Pineau F, Delorme H. Carbon and nitrogen isotopes in the mantle. Chem. Geol. 1986;57:41–62. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(86)90093-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Londry KL, Des Marais DJ. Stable carbon isotope fractionation by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:2942–2949. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2942-2949.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Machel HG. Bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction in diagenetic settings—old and new insights. Sediment. Geol. 2001;140:143–175. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(00)00176-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Reinhardt M, et al. Organic signatures in Pleistocene cherts from Lake Magadi (Kenya)—implications for early Earth hydrothermal deposits. Biogeosciences. 2019;16:2443–2465. doi: 10.5194/bg-16-2443-2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pace NR. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science. 1997;276:734–740. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ferry JG, Lessner DJ. Methanogenesis in marine sediments. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1125:147–157. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Muyzer G, Stams AJM. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;6:441–454. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Finster K, Tanimoto Y, Bak F. Fermentation of methanethiol and dimethylsulfide by a newly isolated methanogenic bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 1992;157:425–430. doi: 10.1007/BF00249099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Thiel J, Byrne JM, Kappler A, Schink B, Pester M. Pyrite formation from FeS and H2S is mediated through microbial redox activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:6897–6902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814412116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wächtershäuser G. The origin of life and its methodological challenge. J. Theor. Biol. 1997;187:483–494. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Todd ZR, House CH. Vesicles protect activated acetic acid. Astrobiology. 2014;14:859–865. doi: 10.1089/ast.2014.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Plessen B, Lüders V. Simultaneous measurements of gas isotopic compositions of fluid inclusion gases (N2, CH4, CO2) using continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2012;26:1157–1161. doi: 10.1002/rcm.6201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data to support the findings are provided in the paper (results section; Figs. 1–6) and the supplementary information (Supplementary Figs. 1, 3–5). GC–MS raw data are available from the corresponding author upon request.