Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-020-72249-3, published online 16 September 2020
This Article contains errors, where the Tables and Figures are incorrectly referenced.
In the Results section, ‘Characterisation of the tested dressings’,
“Ialugen Plus (Ia) is, on the other hand, a cotton mesh impregnated with silver sulphadiazine cream (Table 1).”
should read:
“Ialugen Plus (Ia) is, on the other hand, a cotton mesh impregnated with silver sulphadiazine cream (Supplementary Table 1).
In the Discussion section,
“In good agreement with our toxicity assessment, we observed that only the Sc dressing failed to induce significant DNA damage in vitro (Fig. 3).”
should read:
“In good agreement with our toxicity assessment, we observed that only the Sc dressing failed to induce significant DNA damage in vitro (Fig. 4).”
In the same section,
“The DNA damage is probably linked to the increased oxidative stress, which we visualised using DCF-DA (Fig. 4).”
should read:
“The DNA damage is probably linked to the increased oxidative stress, which we visualised using DCF-DA (Fig. 3).”
Lastly, Figure 5 is a duplication of Supplementary Figure 3. The correct Figure 5 appears below as Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A corrected version of Figure 5. Effect of silver dressings on neutrophil activation. (A) Non-activated or (B) PMA-, and (C) OZP- pre-activated neutrophils were incubated with dressing extracts (in 10% FBS RPMI-media) and their oxidative burst measured. The results represent means of four independent experiments ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.