dear editor, Most of the currently available cytokine and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) expression data from hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) lesions have been obtained through painful, invasive sampling techniques such as biopsies. 1 In contrast, a Transdermal Analysis Patch (TAP, FibroTx, Tallinn, Estonia) captures and measures biomarkers at the skin surface and as such represents a novel, noninvasive and patient‐friendly diagnostic tool for skin biomarker detection. The aim of this study was to measure the levels of several cytokines and AMPs in both lesional and uninvolved skin of patients with HS and site‐matched skin of controls using TAPs.
Twenty patients with HS and 10 healthy control participants were included. TAPs contained capturing antibodies for interleukin (IL)‐1α, IL‐1RA, IL‐8, IL‐12, IL‐17A, IL‐23p19, C‐C motif chemokine ligand 27, kallikrein‐related peptidase‐5, human β‐defensin (hBD)‐1, hBD‐2, hBD‐3, hBD‐4 and a negative and IgG control. The patches were applied on inflamed lesions in the axilla and groin, on associated uninvolved skin, and on identical sites in controls. 2 TAPs remained in place for 20 min, and were stored at –20 °C until further analysis by spot enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 3 Using GraphPad Prism (v. 8), differences were analysed with Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests or Mann–Whitney U‐tests. P‐values ≤ 0·05 were considered significant. Approval was granted by the institutional review board of the Erasmus University Medical Center (MEC‐2017‐1126).
Eighty per cent (16 of 20) of the included patients with HS were female, 12 had Hurley stage II or III and 13 patients were current smokers, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30·7 ± 7·12. Eighty per cent (8 of 10) of controls were female and none were current smokers, with a mean BMI of 23·1 ± 3·3.
Significantly lower concentrations of IL‐1α were found in HS lesional axilla skin compared with uninvolved skin (P = 0·016); see Table 1 for fold changes (absolute levels are available on request). Lesional axillary and uninvolved upper arm skin in patients with HS showed significantly higher concentrations of IL‐17A than in controls (respectively, P = 0·010 and P = 0·009). In patients with HS and controls lower concentrations of IL‐23p19 were found in axilla and groin skin compared with uninvolved skin. Levels of hBD‐2 were significantly increased in lesional axilla and groin compared with uninvolved sites, respectively, P < 0·001 and P < 0·001. Significantly different concentrations of hBD‐1, hBD‐2 and hBD‐3 were seen between uninvolved skin of patients with HS and identical sites in controls.
Table 1.
HS lesional axilla vs. HS uninvolved upper arm | HS lesional axilla vs. HC axilla | HS uninvolved upper arm vs. HC upper arm | HS lesional groin vs. HS uninvolved thigh | HS lesional groin vs. HC groin | HS uninvolved thigh vs. HC thigh | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FC | P‐value | FC | P‐value | FC | P‐value | FC | P‐value | FC | P‐value | FC | P‐value | |||||||
IL‐1α | 0·53 | ↓ | 0·017b | 3·32 | ns | 0·99 | ns | 0·53 | ns | 1·02 | ns | 1·52 | ns | |||||
IL‐1RA | 0·48 | ns | 3·32 | ↑ | 0·027 | 0·70 | ns | 1·95 | ns | 15·20 | ↑ | 0·007 | 1·12 | ns | ||||
IL‐8 | 20·91 | ↑a | 0·003b | 20·91 | ↑a | 0·007 | ND | – | 11·01 | ↑a | 0·003c | 11·01 | ↑a | 0·009 | ND | – | ||
IL‐12 | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ||||||
IL‐17A | 1·19 | ns | 16·59 | 0·011 | 9·22 | ↑ | 0·010 | 0·99 | ns | 2·25 | ns | 2·00 | ns | |||||
IL‐23p19 | 0·69 | ns | 1·16 | ns | 1·18 | ns | 0·70 | ↓ | 0·027 | 0·92 | ns | 1·06 | ns | |||||
CCL‐27 | 0·57 | ns | 1·00 | ns | 0·71 | ns | 1·00 | ns | 1·00 | ns | 1·00 | ns | ||||||
KLK‐5 | 1·47 | ns | 3·04 | ns | 1·85 | ns | 1·42 | ns | 2·80 | ns | 0·95 | ns | ||||||
hBD‐1 | 0·53 | ↓ | 0·006 | 0·50 | ↓ | 0·015 | 0·72 | ns | 1·34 | ns | 1·03 | ns | 0·53 | ↓ | 0·024 | |||
hBD‐2 | 5·43 | ↑ | 0·001 | 9·14 | ↑ | 0·022 | 1·68 | ↑ | 0·010 | 4·24 | ↑ | < 0·001d | 8·30 | ↑ | < 0·001 | 1·96 | ↑ | 0·011 |
hBD‐3 | 1·10 | ns | 1·24 | ns | 1·00 | ns | 1·09 | ns | 1·26 | ↑ | ns | 1·06 | ns | |||||
hBD‐4 | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – | ND | – |
CCL‐27, C‐C motif chemokine ligand 27; hBD, human β‐defensin; HC, healthy control; HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; IL, interleukin; KLK, kallikrein‐related peptidase; ND, not detected in both groups; ns, not significant; bold, significant (P ≤ 0·05).
aAnalysed using half of the lower limit of detection for one of the groups where data was under limit of detection; bmissing, n = 3; cmissing, n = 2; dmissing, n = 1.
The IL‐1 pathway is known to be activated in HS, yet our study showed decreased levels of IL‐1α in HS lesional skin compared with uninvolved skin. Lower IL‐1α levels in lesional HS skin could reflect intracellular location and consumption of IL‐1α at sites of inflammation. 4 , 5 However, further investigation is needed to understand the complex regulation of IL‐1 in the skin and in HS.
In contrast to the elevated concentrations of hBD‐2 and hBD‐3 in HS lesional skin, the level of hBD‐1 was decreased compared with controls. Lower levels of hBD‐1 in lesional tissue have been described previously by Hotz et al. 6 In contrast to hBD‐2 and hBD‐3, expression of hBD‐1 is not induced by inflammatory stimuli such as tumour necrosis factor‐α, IL‐1β and interferon‐γ. 7 The mechanisms behind the decreased levels of hBD‐1 in HS pathogenesis remain elusive. The significantly higher levels of hBD‐2 in uninvolved HS skin compared with identical sites in controls is suggestive for an activated innate immune system in the uninvolved skin in patients with HS.
Relatively high concentrations of IL‐23p19 were found in all samples and no significant differences were seen between patients with HS and controls. The detection of increased levels of IL‐23p19 in lesional HS biopsies, which capture both epidermis and dermis, and the lack of differences in lesional skin compared with controls when measured with TAPs, might indicate that IL‐23 secreted by keratinocytes plays a lesser role in HS pathogenesis than IL‐23 released by dermal dendritic cells. 1
The detection of biomarkers from the topmost layers of the skin could be seen as a limitation in HS as the deep dermal infiltrate, characteristic of the disease, is probably not fully captured by a TAP. Nevertheless, keratinocytes are active players in HS inflammation and assessing keratinocyte‐related inflammatory mediators in a noninvasive manner could provide new insights into their role in the pathogenesis of HS.
In conclusion, this is the first study assessing the expression of cytokines and AMPs using TAPs in patients with HS. We showed that TAPs can be used effectively to evaluate a wide range of HS‐associated biomarkers in the skin. Additionally, the noninvasive, patient‐friendly nature of this technique could prove to be of specific value for monitoring the inflammatory state of the skin over time both in clinical trials and daily practice. The results found in this study support a role for anti‐IL‐17A in the treatment of HS, but raise questions on the benefit of anti‐IL‐1α. Overall, our results confirm previously published data obtained with invasive techniques and highlight the role of the epidermis and subclinical inflammation in HS pathogenesis.
Author Contribution
Christine B. Ardon: Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Cong Wang: Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting). Errol P Prens: Conceptualization (lead); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Kelsey R. van Straalen: Formal analysis (supporting); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐review & editing (lead).
Acknowledgments
the authors acknowledge FibroTx for providing the TAPs and performing the spot ELISA analyses for this study.
Funding sources: this study was funded by the Department of Dermatology of the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- 1. Vossen A, van der Zee HH, Prens EP. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review integrating inflammatory pathways into a cohesive pathogenic model. Front Immunol 2018; 9:2965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Frew JW, Navrazhina K, Byrd AS et al Defining lesional, perilesional and unaffected skin in hidradenitis suppurativa: proposed recommendations for clinical trials and translational research studies. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:1339–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Orro K, Smirnova O, Arshavskaja J et al Development of TAP, a non‐invasive test for qualitative and quantitative measurements of biomarkers from the skin surface. Biomark Res 2014; 2:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kanni T, Tzanetakou V, Savva A et al Compartmentalized cytokine responses in hidradenitis suppurativa. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0130522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Van der Zee HH, Laman JD, de Ruiter L et al Adalimumab (antitumour necrosis factor‐α) treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa ameliorates skin inflammation: an in situ and ex vivo study. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166:298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hotz C, Boniotto M, Guguin A et al Intrinsic defect in keratinocyte function leads to inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Invest Dermatol 2016; 136:1768–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sørensen OE, Thapa DR, Rosenthal A et al Differential regulation of β‐defensin expression in human skin by microbial stimuli. J Immunol 2005; 174:4870–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]