Abstract
Objective
To describe maternal and neonatal glycaemic control following antenatal corticosteroid administration to women with diabetes in pregnancy.
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Setting
A tertiary hospital in Auckland, New Zealand
Population
Women with diabetes in pregnancy who received antenatal corticosteroids from 2006–2016.
Methods
Corticosteroid administration, maternal and neonatal glycaemia data were retrieved from electronic patient records. Demographic data were downloaded from the hospital database. Relationships between variables were analysed using multivariate analysis.
Main outcome measures
Maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia
Results
Corticosteroids were administered to 647 of 7317 of women with diabetes (8.8%) who gave birth to 715 babies. After an initial course of corticosteroids, 92% and 52% of women had blood glucose concentrations > 7 and > 10 mmol/L respectively. Median peak blood glucose concentration of approximately 10 mmol/L occurred 9 hours after corticosteroid administration and hyperglycaemia lasted approximately 72 hours. Thirty percent of women gave birth within 72 hours of the last dose of corticosteroids. Babies of women who were hyperglycaemic within 24 hours of birth were more likely to develop hypoglycaemia (< 2.6 mmol/L, OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.10–2.07], p = 0.01) and severe hypoglycaemia (≤ 2.0 mmol/L, OR 2.00 [95% CI 1.41–2.85], p < 0.0001) than babies of non-hyperglycaemic mothers. There was no association between maternal glycaemia within 7 days of the last dose of corticosteroids and neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Conclusions
Hyperglycaemia is common in women with diabetes in pregnancy following antenatal corticosteroid administration. Maternal hyperglycaemia in the 24 hours prior to birth is associated with increased risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Limitations included the retrospective study design, so that not all data were available for all women and babies and the glucose testing schedule was variable.
Introduction
Antenatal corticosteroids (ANC) improve outcomes for babies born preterm [1] but cause maternal hyperglycaemia [2] particularly in women with diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) [2–4]. Limited data suggest that maternal blood glucose concentration (BGC) is elevated for at least 48 hours after two doses of ANC [5, 6] although this time period is uncertain for women with DIP. The recommended optimal time for ANC administration prior to elective birth is 48 hours [7]. As approximately 25% of all women who receive ANC give birth within 24 hours [8], maternal hyperglycaemia is likely to peak close to the time of birth for many women.
Maternal blood glucose crosses the placenta by facilitated diffusion. Thus, maternal hyperglycaemia leads to fetal hyperglycaemia and increased insulin secretion [9] which, if persistent, can result in neonatal hypoglycaemia. In women without diabetes, a high glucose load given prior to elective caesarean section led to maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia [10]. A recent systematic review of 23 studies in women with diabetes found that 11 identified an association between maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia [11]. However, there was considerable heterogeneity amongst studies, with multiple definitions used for both maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia. In both women with type-1 diabetes [12] and with gestational diabetes (GDM) [4], continuous glucose monitoring during pregnancy has been shown to improve maternal glycaemic control and decrease the rate of neonatal complications including neonatal hypoglycaemia. Algorithms for insulin administration after ANC administration also have been shown to improve maternal glycaemic control [13, 14] and decrease the rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia [14].
Babies born to women with DIP are more likely to be preterm and be exposed to ANC than babies born to mothers without diabetes [15]. Approximately 50% of newborns of mothers with DIP become hypoglycaemic [16], which is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes [17]. The rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia has been reported to be increased in babies exposed to ANC prior to both preterm birth [2, 18] and following elective caesarean section at term [19]. A randomised controlled trial [20] found a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia in babies born late-preterm to women randomised to ANC compared with placebo. However, the relationship between ANC, maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia remains unclear.
We aimed to describe, in a cohort of women with DIP receiving ANC, the rate of maternal hyperglycaemia and its temporal relationship to ANC, the rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia, and the relationship between maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Methods
Study design, participants and setting
We undertook a retrospective cohort study of women who had DIP (type 1, type 2 or gestational diabetes) birthing at National Women’s Health, Auckland, New Zealand, a tertiary obstetric referral hospital, between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016. ANC exposure was defined as any corticosteroid administration for the purpose of improving neonatal outcome from 22 completed weeks of pregnancy.
Data collection
Maternal medical records were reviewed for all women giving birth at < 370 weeks’ gestation; admitted to hospital for > 2 hours for any reason during pregnancy between 220−366 weeks’ gestation; birthing by elective caesarean section at any gestation; or birthing by emergency caesarean section at < 39 weeks’ gestation. All babies born to included mothers were identified from the hospital database. Details of ANC administration (drug, dose, date and time of each dose) were retrieved from prescription records. The indication for ANC administration was not available. An initial course of ANC was defined as the first course of ANC administered in the pregnancy. A repeat course of ANC was defined as a second or later course of ANC administered 7 days or more after the initial course. Maternal demographic, obstetric and neonatal data were extracted from the hospital database and entered into a secure anonymised research database. Further details of the cohort have been described previously [21].
All available maternal and neonatal BGCs, measured both by laboratory and point-of-care devices, including in-patient, outpatient and self-recorded measurements, were obtained from the clinical records. For mothers, all BGCs from 48 hours prior to the first dose of ANC until 7 days after the last dose for each course, or until the time of birth if this occurred before 7 days. BGCs were also collected for the 24 hours prior to birth. BGCs measured before breakfast were assumed to be fasting. For babies, all BGCs from birth until 7 days after birth. Insulin data were collected from hospital records and also patient-held records where available.
Definitions
Definitions used for maternal glycaemic control for each period were: hypoglycaemia, < 3.5 mmol/L; elevated fasting BGC, ≥ 5.5 mmol/L; hyperglycaemia, BGC above a threshold of 7, 8, 10 or 11 mmol/L; peak hyperglycaemia, maximum BGC; time to onset of hyperglycaemia, time between administration of the first dose of ANC and the first BGC above the threshold; time to resolution of hyperglycaemia, the time from the first dose of ANC to the last hyperglycaemic recording, and blood glucose measurements out of glycaemic target range, < 4.0 mmol/L or > 7.0 mmol/L.
Definitions used for neonatal glycaemic control were: neonatal hypoglycaemia, < 2.6 mmol/L; severe hypoglycaemia, ≤ 2.0 mmol/L [22]; recurrent hypoglycaemia, a second or subsequent BGC of ≤ 2.6 mmol/L occurring after resolution of a previous episode of hypoglycaemia (defined as at least one BGC of > 2.6 mmol/L); hyperglycaemia, > 8.0 mmol/L [23].
Clinical management
Hospital guidelines for the administration of ANC did not recommend administration prior to elective caesarean section. Guidelines for management of maternal hyperglycaemia did not change during the study period and recommended maintaining BGC between 3.5 and 7 mmol/L. Insulin administration was recommended after ANC administration if the BGC exceeded 7 mmol/l on two occasions or exceeded 8 mmol/l once [24]. Hospital guidelines for screening for neonatal hypoglycaemia recommended that all neonates born to mothers with DIP had BGC measured within 1–2 hours of birth, then four hourly until the baby was feeding well and three consecutive measurements were ≥ 2.6 mmol/l [25]. Use of oral dextrose gel for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia was introduced in late 2013.
Analysis
Clinical information from the maternity database was imported into a study database created using JMP-14 (SAS, Cary, North Carolina). Details from the clinical record, including variables missing from the maternity database, were transcribed into the database. A review of 10% of the records by an independent researcher identified fewer than 1% of checked records with discrepancies in ANC, maternal or neonatal BGC data. Outlying data points were not removed. Mothers and babies with no glycaemic data were excluded from analysis. We did not impute any values for missing data.
The time course of maternal BGC was described by calculating the proportion of women exceeding each threshold and the mean BGC in each consecutive three-hour epoch after ANC administration. For women who had received insulin prior to ANC administration, the increase in insulin dose after ANC was calculated as the percentage increase in the 24 hour period after ANC administration compared to that in the 24 hour period immediately prior to ANC administration. For women who had not received insulin prior to ANC administration, the administration of insulin over the subsequent 24 hours was recorded as “yes” or “no”.
Data are presented as number and %, number and interquartile range (IQR) or range, and mean and standard deviation (SD). Maternal, neonatal and ANC variables were compared using nominal logistic regression and results presented as proportions with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The results from the univariate analyses were used to construct multivariate models using multinomial logistic forwards and backwards stepwise regression. Results from the multinomial logistic regression are presented unless otherwise specified. A two-sided p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Associations between maternal and neonatal glycaemia were analysed for each mother and baby pair, with multiple pregnancies treated as separate pairs. Using a nested analysis or using only one of the mother baby pairs did not change any of the results.
Ethics
The Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee approved this study, including access to patient records without informed consent (Reference 16NTB216).
Results
Details of the study cohort have been reported previously [21]. In brief, 7317 women with DIP were identified from the hospital database, of whom 647 (8.8%) received ANC. Of these, 234 (3.2%) had no blood glucose data at the time of ANC administration or within 24 hours of birth. Glycaemic data were available for 556 women after an initial course, 585 after the last course and 579 within 24 hours of birth. The cohort was approximately 25% European, 16–20% each Asian, Indian and Pacific and 10% each for Māori and ‘other’ (Table 1). Sixty-five percent had gestational diabetes, 21% type-2 and 13% type-1 diabetes, and 47% had a BMI > 30 kg/m2. There were 63 (11%) women with a multiple pregnancy (61 twins and 2 triplets) and 417 (72%) of women birthed by caesarean section (Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of women with diabetes in pregnancy who received antenatal corticosteroids and their babies for whom glycaemic data were available.
Mothers | Initial course = 556 | Last course = 585 | Birth = 579 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethnicity | n | % | n | % | n | % |
Asian | 96 | 17 | 106 | 18 | 112 | 19 |
Indian | 92 | 17 | 91 | 16 | 91 | 16 |
Māori | 68 | 12 | 69 | 11 | 70 | 12 |
New Zealand European | 140 | 25 | 151 | 26 | 145 | 25 |
Pacifica | 111 | 20 | 118 | 20 | 114 | 20 |
Other | 49 | 9 | 50 | 9 | 47 | 8 |
Maternal age (years) | ||||||
< 25 | 38 | 7 | 37 | 6 | 37 | 6 |
25–34 | 272 | 49 | 288 | 49 | 292 | 50 |
35 and more | 246 | 44 | 260 | 44 | 250 | 43 |
Birth year | ||||||
2006–2009 | 178 | 32 | 185 | 32 | 182 | 31 |
2010–2013 | 233 | 42 | 246 | 42 | 245 | 42 |
2014–2016 | 145 | 26 | 154 | 26 | 152 | 26 |
Parity | ||||||
0 | 205 | 37 | 216 | 37 | 218 | 38 |
1 | 185 | 33 | 192 | 33 | 187 | 32 |
2 or more | 166 | 30 | 177 | 30 | 174 | 30 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | ||||||
< 20 | 21 | 4 | 22 | 4 | 20 | 3 |
20–24.9 | 133 | 24 | 147 | 25 | 143 | 25 |
25–29.9 | 141 | 25 | 145 | 25 | 145 | 25 |
30 or more | 261 | 47 | 270 | 46 | 270 | 47 |
Multiple pregnancy | ||||||
Multiple | 58 | 10 | 59 | 10 | 54 | 9 |
Singleton | 498 | 90 | 526 | 90 | 525 | 91 |
Type of diabetes | ||||||
Gestational Diabetes | 360 | 65 | 389 | 66 | 380 | 66 |
Type-1 | 77 | 14 | 76 | 13 | 77 | 13 |
Type-2 | 119 | 21 | 120 | 21 | 122 | 21 |
Mode of birth | ||||||
Caesarean Section—Elective | 205 | 37 | 215 | 37 | 206 | 36 |
Caesarean Section—Emergency | 186 | 33 | 202 | 35 | 200 | 35 |
Operative Vaginal Birth | 34 | 6 | 32 | 5 | 36 | 6 |
Spontaneous Vaginal Birth | 131 | 24 | 136 | 21 | 137 | 24 |
Babies | N = 714 | |||||
Birth gestation (weeks) | N | % | ||||
< 290 | 37 | 5 | ||||
290–326 | 152 | 21 | ||||
330–346 | 159 | 22 | ||||
350–366 | 177 | 25 | ||||
370 or more | 189 | 26 | ||||
Birthweight (g) | ||||||
< 1500 | 111 | 16 | ||||
1500–2500 | 280 | 39 | ||||
2501–4000 | 277 | 39 | ||||
> 4000 | 46 | 6 | ||||
Birthweight Centile | ||||||
< 3rd | 28 | 4 | ||||
3-10th | 56 | 8 | ||||
10-90th | 493 | 69 | ||||
> 90th | 137 | 19 | ||||
Female | 321 | 45 | ||||
Admitted to neonatal nursery | 464 | 65 |
Overall, 74% of babies were born preterm and 65% admitted to the neonatal nursery. Only 5% of babies were born at < 29 weeks of gestation and approximately 25% each at 29–32, 33–34, 35–36, and ≥ 37 weeks’. Birthweight was > 90th centile for 19% of babies, between the tenth and 90th centile for 69%, < tenth centile for 12% and < third centile for 4%. Sixty-five percent were admitted to the neonatal nursery (Table 1).
For an initial course of ANC, 97% of women received 11.4 mg betamethasone, 85% received 2 doses at a 24-hour interval, 17% received their first dose at more than 34 weeks’ gestation, 23% received their last course of ANC at more than 34 weeks’ gestation and 18% received a repeat course of ANC, of which 92% comprised a single dose (S1 Table).
Maternal glycaemic control
The median (IQR) number of BGC recordings during the study period was 17 (7–30) for the initial course, 15 (6–28) for the last course, 11 (3–26) for a repeat course and was 5 (3–7) in the 24 hours prior to birth. The median peak maternal BGC was similar after the initial, last and repeat courses of ANC (10.1, 9.9 and 9.2 mmol/L respectively) and was 6.8 mmol/L in the 24 hours prior to birth (S2 Table). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 22% of women before and 28% after the initial course of ANC. Women with type 1 diabetes had the highest number of BGC measurements (24 (17–42), the highest peak BGC (13.4 mmol/L) and the largest proportion who experienced hypoglycaemia both before (49%) and after (58%) ANC. (S2 Table).
For an initial course of ANC, 92% of women were hyperglycaemic at a threshold of 7 mmol/L, 83% at a threshold of 8 mmol/L, 52% at a threshold of 10 mmol/L and 35% at a threshold of 11 mmol/L (S3 Table). Similar proportions were observed after the last course, and for women with different types of diabetes (S3 Table).
Maternal BGC increased after the first dose of the initial course of ANC from a mean (SD) baseline of 6.1 (2.1) mmol/L, reaching a peak of 8.4 (2.7) mmol/L at 9 hours and falling to a nadir of 7.2 (2.1) mmol/L at 24 hours (Fig 1). A second peak with mean 8.1 (2.4) mmol/L occurred at 30 hours before BGC returned to pre-ANC levels at approximately 72 hours. After a repeat course of ANC, the pattern was similar, with second smaller peak of 7.1 (2.0) mmol/L at 27 hours. This second peak remained even when women receiving two doses of ANC for a repeat course were excluded. The proportion of women whose BGCs exceeded the different hyperglycaemic thresholds showed a similar pattern (Fig 1).
On multivariate analysis, pre-existing diabetes was the strongest independent predictor of maternal hyperglycaemia, with birth from 2010 onwards predictive of a significantly lower risk of hyperglycaemia compared with birth between 2006–2009 (S4 Table).
On univariate analysis, the rate of maternal hyperglycaemia at all thresholds was significantly increased for women who completed an initial course of ANC compared to those who did not and, at a threshold of 7 mmol/L, was increased for women who received two doses of ANC at a 24-hour interval compared to a 12-hour interval (Table 2). The median (IQR) duration of hyperglycaemia at a threshold of 8 mmol/L, but not other thresholds, was significantly less for women receiving ANC at a 12-hour compared to a 24-hour interval (13 (5–44) vs 33 (17–89) hours, p = 0.002). Women receiving an initial course of ANC after 34 weeks’ gestation were less likely to develop hyperglycaemia than those receiving ANC between 24–34 weeks’ gestation. Hyperglycaemia was less common after a repeat course of ANC than an initial course and women who received 1 dose of ANC for their last course were significantly less likely to develop hyperglycaemia than those receiving two doses. Women receiving either an initial or last course of ANC at more than 34 weeks’ gestation were less likely to develop hyperglycaemia than women receiving ANC at less than 35 weeks’ (Table 2).
Table 2. Relationships between antenatal corticosteroid variables and the rate of maternal hyperglycaemia.
Univariate analysis | ||||||||||||
ANC variable | Hyperglycaemic Threshold | |||||||||||
7 mmol/L | 8 mmol/L | 10 mmol/L | 11 mmol/L | |||||||||
OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
Initial Course | ||||||||||||
Complete course of ANC (2 doses) | ||||||||||||
Yes | Reference | |||||||||||
No | 0.05 | 0.02–0.09 | < 0.0001 | 0.11 | 0.06–0.20 | < 0.0001 | 0.10 | 0.03–0.20 | < 0.0001 | 0.17 | 0.06–0.49 | 0.001 |
Schedule of initial course | ||||||||||||
24 hours | Reference | |||||||||||
12 hours | 0.18 | 0.06–0.52 | 0.002 | 0.80 | 0.29–2.16 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.27–1.18 | 0.13 | 0.96 | 0.44–2.04 | 0.91 |
Gestation at administration of first dose of initial ANC course | ||||||||||||
24–34 weeks | Reference | |||||||||||
≥ 35 weeks | 0.38 | 0.19–0.75 | 0.003 | 0.45 | 0.28–0.76 | 0.002 | 0.58 | 0.35–0.96 | 0.036 | 0.56 | 0.34–0.92 | 0.027 |
Last Course | ||||||||||||
Repeat course of ANC | ||||||||||||
No | Reference | |||||||||||
Yes | 0.66 | 0.33–1.32 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 0.31–0.84 | 0.008 | 0.42 | 0.26–0.67 | 0.0003 | 0.57 | 0.34–0.94 | 0.03 |
Number of doses in last course | ||||||||||||
2 | Reference | |||||||||||
1 | 0.15 | 0.09–0.29 | < 0.0001 | 0.24 | 0.15–0.37 | < 0.0001 | 0.28 | 0.18–0.43 | < 0.0001 | 0.40 | 0.25–0.64 | 0.0002 |
Gestation at administration of first dose of last ANC Course | ||||||||||||
24–34 weeks | Reference | |||||||||||
≥ 35 weeks | 0.32 | 0.18–0.57 | 0.0001 | 0.49 | 0.32–0.77 | 0.002 | 0.59 | 0.41–0.86 | 0.006 | 0.67 | 0.44–1.03 | 0.07 |
Multivariate analysis | ||||||||||||
Initial Course | ||||||||||||
Complete course of ANC (2 doses) | ||||||||||||
Yes | Reference | |||||||||||
No | 0.04 | 0.02–0.09 | < 0.0001 | 0.09 | 0.05–0.18 | < 0.0001 | 0.10 | 0.04–0.27 | < 0.0001 | 0.17 | 0.06–0.49 | < 0.0001 |
Schedule of initial course | ||||||||||||
24 | Reference | |||||||||||
12 | 0.23 | 0.08–0.62 | 0.004 | 0.69 | 0.31–1.52 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.27–1.21 | 0.15 | 0.97 | 0.45–2.09 | 0.95 |
1 Dose | 0.06 | 0.03–0.13 | < 0.0001 | 0.15 | 0.31–1.52 | < 0.0001 | 0.10 | 0.04–0.26 | < 0.0001 | 0.17 | 0.06–0.49 | 0.001 |
Gestation at ANC administration | ||||||||||||
24–34 | Reference | |||||||||||
≥ 35 | 0.37 | 0.19–0.74 | 0.005 | 0.50 | 0.31–0.80 | 0.004 | 0.55 | 0.35–0.86 | 0.008 | 0.61 | 0.37–0.98 | 0.04 |
Last Course | ||||||||||||
Total number of doses in pregnancy | ||||||||||||
2 doses | Reference | |||||||||||
1 dose | 0.35 | 0.01–8.90 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.06–2.36 | 0.31 | 0.50 | 0.11–2.32 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.09–2.60 | 0.40 |
≥ 3 dose | 1.76 | 0.07–40.0 | 0.74 | 1.02 | 0.19–5.47 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.28–3.22 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.24–3.21 | 0.84 |
Schedule of last course | ||||||||||||
24 | Reference | |||||||||||
12 | 0.12 | 0.04–0.38 | 0.0003 | 0.52 | 0.18–1.49 | 0.22 | 0.58 | 0.24–1.39 | 0.22 | 0.84 | 0.33–2.11 | 0.71 |
1 dose | 0.13 | 0.005–3.23 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.05–1.61 | 0.16 | 0.32 | 0.09–1.15 | 0.08 | 0.48 | 0.12–1.92 | 0.31 |
Gestation at ANC administration | ||||||||||||
24–34 | Reference | |||||||||||
≥ 34 | 0.42 | 0.09–1.91 | 0.26 | 0.37 | 0.14–1.01 | 0.054 | 0.56 | 0.29–1.07 | 0.08 | 0.47 | 0.25–0.88 | 0.02 |
OR, odds ratio; ANC, antenatal corticosteroids.
On multivariate analysis including the completeness of the course of ANC, the time between doses and the gestation at administration, the significant associations between maternal hyperglycaemia and the completeness of the course and the gestation at administration remained for the initial course. However, the decreased risk of maternal hyperglycaemia after a 12-hour interval between doses compared to a 24-hour interval remained only for a threshold of 7 mmol/L (Table 2). After the last course of ANC, the risk of maternal hyperglycaemia at any threshold for women who had either one dose or three or more doses during the pregnancy, compared to only two doses was not significantly different. However, women receiving three or more doses of ANC were more likely to be hyperglycaemic than women receiving only one dose of ANC at a threshold of 7 mmol/L (OR 4.82, 95% CI 2.05–11.81, p = 0.0003) and 8 mmol/L (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.34–5.66, p = 0.005) but not at higher thresholds (10 mmol/L: OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.93–5.89, p = 0.07; 11 mmol/L: OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.69–5.61, p = 0.21). Women who received a last course of ANC at more than 34 weeks’ gestation were less likely to be hyperglycaemic than women who received a last course before this gestation, with odds ratios around 0.5 for all BGC thresholds, although this was statistically significant only at a threshold of 11 mmol/L (Table 2).
The majority of women with pre-existing diabetes were receiving insulin prior to ANC administration (S5 Table). For women with gestational diabetes, the proportion receiving insulin increased from 40% before to 66% after ANC administration. Amongst women receiving insulin prior to ANC, those with gestational diabetes were receiving the smallest dose and women with type 2 diabetes the largest dose, but the percentage increase in dose after ANC was approximately 80% for all types of diabetes (S5 Table).
Neonatal glycaemic control
Glycaemic data were available for 713 of the 715 babies. The median (IQR) number of blood glucose measurements was 7 (4–10). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 46% (331/713) of babies, and was severe in 27% (193/713) and recurrent in 11% (77/713), while 6% (43/713) developed hyperglycaemia. Of the 331 babies who developed hypoglycaemia, 75% (247/331) did so within 2 hours of birth and 8% (25/331) after 24 hours.
Using univariate analysis, neonatal hypoglycaemia was associated with (a) maternal variables: type of diabetes; ethnicity; maternal year of birth; mode of birth; multiple pregnancy, and BMI; (b) ANC variables: time from ANC to birth; repeat course of ANC; number of doses of last course, and latest gestation ANC administered; and (c) neonatal variables: birth gestation; birthweight; birthweight centile; birthweight z-score, and sex (S6 Table).
Using multivariate analysis including variables that were significant on the univariate analysis, the odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemia were increased with pre-existing diabetes compared to gestational diabetes, caesarean section compared to spontaneous vaginal birth, a birth gestation of 35 weeks or more compared to < 35 weeks, an interval between ANC administration and birth of 12–48 hours compared to all other time intervals, female as opposed to male sex and increasing birthweight z-score (Table 3).
Table 3. Associations between maternal, antenatal corticosteroid, and neonatal variables and neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Maternal Variables | Neonatal Hypoglycaemia | Severe Hypoglycaemia | Recurrent Hypoglycaemia | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | (95%CI) | p-value | OR | (95%CI) | p-value | OR | (95%CI) | p-value | |
Type of diabetes | |||||||||
GDM | Reference | ||||||||
Type-1 Diabetes | 3.00 | 1.73–65.2 | < 0.0001 | 3.57 | 2.07–6.17 | < 0.0001 | 1.91 | 0.88–4.14 | 0.10 |
Type-2 Diabetes | 1.62 | 1.04–2.55 | 0.034 | 1.81 | 1.20–3.22 | 0.007 | 1.89 | 0.99–3.63 | 0.055 |
Ethnicity | |||||||||
NZ European | Reference | ||||||||
Asian | 0.82 | 0.48–1.34 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.31–1.07 | 0.08 | 1.02 | 0.42–2.44 | 0.97 |
Indian | 1.11 | 0.66–1.86 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.42–1.39 | 0.38 | 1.35 | 0.58–3.16 | 0.49 |
Maori | 0.76 | 0.42–1.37 | 0.36 | 0.63 | 0.33–1.23 | 0.18 | 0.80 | 0.28–2.65 | 0.62 |
Pacific | 0.84 | 0.49–1.44 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.31–1.07 | 0.09 | 0.98 | 0.44–2.21 | 0.97 |
Other | 0.97 | 0.52–1.83 | 0.94 | 0.65 | 0.32–1.35 | 0.25 | 1.17 | 0.43–3.21 | 0.76 |
Mode of birth | |||||||||
SVB | Reference | ||||||||
OVB | 0.96 | 0.44–2.09 | 0.91 | 1.31 | 0.53–3.26 | 0.55 | 1.22 | 0.36–4.19 | 0.75 |
Elective Caesarean | 2.44 | 1.60–3.78 | < 0.0001 | 2.27 | 1.36–3.81 | 0.002 | 1.66 | 0.82–3.39 | 0.16 |
Emergency Caesarean | 1.58 | 1.02–2.44 | 0.040 | 1.26 | 0.74–2.14 | 0.55 | 1.20 | 0.58–2.50 | 0.75 |
Multiple pregnancy | |||||||||
Singleton | Reference | ||||||||
Multiple | 0.77 | 0.51–1.18 | 0.23 | 0.91 | 0.50–1.31 | 0.70 | 0.41 | 0.17–0.95 | 0.038 |
BMI | |||||||||
20–24.9 | Reference | ||||||||
< 20 | 0.84 | 0.35–2.21 | 0.72 | 1.46 | 0.53–4.09 | 0.46 | 1.81 | 0.45–7.30 | 0.40 |
25–29.9 | 0.96 | 0.62–1.51 | 0.87 | 1.39 | 0.82–2.36 | 0.18 | 1.50 | 0.68–3.13 | 0.31 |
≥ 30 | 1.34 | 0.87–2.07 | 0.19 | 1.71 | 1.03–2.86 | 0.038 | 2.21 | 1.04–4.73 | 0.04 |
Birth year | |||||||||
2014–2016 | Reference | ||||||||
2006–2009 | 0.76 | 0.50–1.17 | 0.22 | 0.92 | 0.57–1.48 | 0.73 | 0.33 | 0.17–0.64 | 0.001 |
2010–2013 | 0.90 | 0.61–1.33 | 0.60 | 0.91 | 0.58–1.42 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.30–0.93 | 0.03 |
ANC Variables | |||||||||
Number of doses in pregnancy | |||||||||
2 doses | Reference | ||||||||
1 dose | 0.81 | 0.23–2.86 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.19–3.54 | 0.80 | 0.14 | 0.01–2.00 | 0.14 |
3 or more doses | 0.76 | 0.27–2.11 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.17–1.81 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.02–2.1 | 0.20 |
Time between doses last course | |||||||||
24 hours | Reference | ||||||||
12 hours | 0.70 | 0.31–1.57 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 0.47–2.47 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.12–2.58 | 0.47 |
1 dose only | 0.86 | 0.30–2.50 | 0.79 | 1.03 | 0.30–3.53 | 0.95 | 1.71 | 0.17–16.9 | 0.64 |
Time between ANC administration and birth | |||||||||
12–48 hours | Reference | ||||||||
< 12hours | 0.54 | 0.25–1.15 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.11–0.68 | 0.006 | 4.06 | 0.97–16.9 | 0.055 |
48 hours– 7 days | 0.50 | 0.31–0.80 | 0.004 | 0.39 | 0.24–0.65 | 0.0003 | 1.44 | 0.65–3.17 | 0.36 |
≥ 8 days | 0.41 | 0.26–0.65 | 0.0002 | 0.31 | 0.19–0.51 | < 0.0001 | 1.32 | 0.60–2.87 | 0.48 |
Latest gestation at ANC administration | |||||||||
24–34 weeks | Reference | ||||||||
≥ 35 weeks | 1.74 | 0.97–3.10 | 0.059 | 1.61 | 0.78–3.31 | 0.19 | 1.74 | 0.60–5.04 | 0.30 |
Neonatal Variables | |||||||||
Birth gestation | |||||||||
240−346 weeks | Reference | ||||||||
350–366 weeks | 1.57 | 1.08–2.30 | 0.017 | 1.32 | 0.87–1.99 | 0.18 | 2.12 | 1.16–3.88 | 0.015 |
≥ 37 weeks | 1.01 | 0.69–1.46 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.51–1.20 | 0.78 | 2.16 | 1.91–3.92 | 0.011 |
Sex of the baby | |||||||||
Male | Reference | ||||||||
Female | 1.52 | 1.12–2.06 | 0.007 | 1.53 | 1.09–2.16 | 0.015 | 1.64 | 1.01–2.69 | 0.044 |
Birthweight z-scorea | 1.16 | 1.04–1.31 | 0.008 | 1.29 | 1.13–1.46 | < 0.0001 | 1.28 | 1.08–1.51 | 0.003 |
ANC–Antenatal corticosteroids, BMI–Body mass index. GDM–Gestational diabetes, NZ–New Zealand, SVB–spontaneous vaginal birth, OVB–operative vaginal birth. Analyses are by multiple nominal logistic regression.
a Unit odds ratio (OR) expressed as the change in the rate of the relevant neonatal glycaemic variable for each unit change of z-score.
The increased odds of recurrent hypoglycaemia were similar for type-1 and type-2 diabetes compared to gestational diabetes, but were statistically significant only for type-2 diabetes. The odds of recurrent hyperglycaemia were also increased for singleton compared to multiple pregnancies, maternal BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, birth-year 2014–16, late preterm gestation at birth compared to early term or term, female compared to male sex and increasing birthweight z-score (Table 3).
Association between maternal and neonatal glycaemic control
The relationships between maternal glycaemia after the last course of ANC and in the 24 hours before the birth and neonatal hypoglycaemia or severe hypoglycaemia were assessed for 644 and 634 mother-infant pairs respectively. For 233/626 (37%) women and 265/693 (38%) babies, 24 hours prior to birth was within 72 hours of the first dose of a course of ANC. The median (IQR) peak BGC in the 24 hours prior to birth was 6.8 (5.7–8.7) mmol/L, mean BGC was 5.5 (4.8–6.5) mmol/L and last BCG was 5.3 (4.5–6.3) mmol/L.
The odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia were increased in babies of mothers who had BGC above 7 and 8 mmol/L and who had a fasting BGC ≥ 5.5 mmol/L within 24 hours of birth. The odds also increased with increasing mean BGC and increasing last BGC prior to birth (Table 4). The odds of severe hypoglycaemia were higher but followed the same pattern of relationships with maternal glycaemia. There was no association between neonatal hypoglycaemia and maternal glycaemic control at the time of the last course of ANC administration except for an increase in odds of severe hypoglycaemia in babies whose mothers had BGC > 11 mmol/l (Table 4).
Table 4. Association between neonatal hypoglycaemia and measures of maternal glycaemic control within 24 hours of birth and after the last course of antenatal corticosteroids.
Maternal glycaemia in the 24 hours before birth | |||||||||
Mothers N = 634 | Babies with hypoglycaemia N = 301 | Babies with severe hypoglycaemia N = 179 | |||||||
N (%) | N (%)a | ORb | 95% CI | P value | N (%)a | ORb | 95% CI | P value | |
BGC > 7 mmol/L | 292 (46%) | 155 (52%) | 1.51 | 1.10–2.07 | 0.01 | 105 (72%) | 2.00 | 1.41–2.85 | < 0.0001 |
BGC > 8 mmol/L | 201 (32%) | 114 (38%) | 1.72 | 1.22–2.40 | 0.002 | 82 (56%) | 2.36 | 1.65–3.38 | < 0.0001 |
BGC > 10 mmol/L | 77 (12%) | 41 (14%) | 1.30 | 0.80–2.09 | 0.29 | 33 (23%) | 2.06 | 1.29–3.41 | 0.003 |
BGC > 11 mmol/L | 53 (8%) | 28 (9%) | 1.26 | 0.72–2.21 | 0.42 | 25 (17%) | 2.46 | 1.39–4.35 | 0.002 |
BGC out of rangec | 415 (65%) | 201 (67%) | 1.10 | 0.79–1.54 | 0.53 | 128 (72%) | 1.46 | 1.00–2.12 | 0.046 |
Fasting BGC ≥ 5.5 mmol/L | 214 (34%) | 122 (40%) | 1.56 | 1.09–2.24 | 0.015 | 85 (58%) | 1.80 | 1.24–2.67 | 0.002 |
Peak BGC | - | 1.05 | 0.99–1.12 | 0.11 | - | 1.14 | 1.07–1.23 | 0.0001 | |
Mean BGC | - | 1.17 | 1.04–1.32 | 0.008 | - | 1.25 | 1.10–1.41 | 0.0005 | |
Last BGC before birth | - | 1.11 | 1.00–1.22 | 0.047 | - | 1.13 | 1.02–1.26 | 0.025 | |
Maternal glycaemia after the last course of ANC | |||||||||
Mothers N = 640 | Babies with hypoglycaemia Total = 300 | Babies with severe hypoglycaemia Total = 179 | |||||||
N (%) | N (%)a | ORb | 95% CI | P value | N (%)a | ORb | 95% CI | P value | |
BGC > 7 mmol/L | 579 (90%) | 270 (90%) | 0.91 | 0.53–1.54 | 0.71 | 162 (91%) | 1.01 | 0.57–1.86 | 0.98 |
BGC > 8 mmol/L | 504 (78%) | 239 (80%) | 1.15 | 0.79–1.68 | 0.53 | 146 (82%) | 1.31 | 0.85–2.04 | 0.22 |
BGC > 10 mmol/L | 295 (46%) | 143 (48%) | 1.15 | 0.84–1.56 | 0.39 | 91 (51%) | 1.32 | 0.93–1.86 | 0.11 |
BGC > 11 mmol/L | 197 (31%) | 100 (33%) | 1.27 | 0.90–1.77 | 0.17 | 66 (37%) | 1.47 | 1.02–2.12 | 0.036 |
BGC Out of rangec | 581 (90%) | 270 (90%) | 0.78 | 0.46–1.34 | 0.37 | 162 (91%) | 0.88 | 0.49–1.60 | 0.66 |
Fasting BGC ≥ 5.5 mmol/L | 516 (80%) | 245 (83%) | 1.08 | 0.71–1.66 | 0.72 | 147 (82%) | 0.99 | 0.62–1.6 | 0.96 |
Peak BGC | 1.01 | 0.96–1.07 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 0.97–1.12 | 0.95 |
OR, Odds ratio; BGC, Blood glucose concentration.
a. Only including babies whose mothers exceed the given threshold.
b. Women who do not exceed the specified threshold are the reference group for categorical variables. For continuous variables, the odds ratio is the increase in the rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia or severe hypoglycaemia for a change of 1 mmol/L in maternal blood glucose concentration.
c. Out of range, < 4 or > 7 mmol/L.
Discussion
Main findings
In this large cohort of women with DIP who received ANC, maternal hyperglycaemia was common. Over 90% of women developed hyperglycaemia > 7 mmol/L after an initial or repeat course of ANC, and over 50% developed hyperglycaemia at higher thresholds. Previous studies, which focused on the insulin dose required to maintain euglycaemia, have also reported clinically significant maternal hyperglycaemia after ANC administration in women with both gestational and pre-existing diabetes [5, 13] including when continuous blood glucose monitoring was used to assist with glycaemic management [26]. Although women with pre-existing diabetes exhibited poorer glycaemic control before and after ANC administration, a high proportion of women with gestational diabetes were also hyperglycaemic after ANC administration. The percentage increase in insulin dosage after ANC administration was similar for women with type-1, type-2 and gestational diabetes.
During an initial course of ANC, maternal BGC peaked approximately 9 hours after each dose of ANC and did not return to baseline for approximately 72 hours. As the drug, dose and number of doses in a course of ANC administered to this cohort was highly uniform, it was not possible to explore the associations between these variables and maternal and neonatal glycaemic control. However, in the multivariate analysis, maternal hyperglycaemia at the lowest threshold (7 mmol/L) was less likely following a schedule of two doses 12 hours apart than 24 hours apart, although there was no effect at higher thresholds. This was not due to women receiving ANC at 12 hour intervals giving birth before they had time to develop hyperglycaemia.
Both 12 and 24-hour interval schedules have been shown to decrease the complications of preterm birth [27]. Therefore, particularly in women birthing electively by either caesarean section or induction, for whom current recommendations are to administer ANC 48 hours prior to planned birth [7], future studies should explore whether it is possible to reduce the proportion of women with DIP giving birth while hyperglycaemic by increasing the time interval between ANC and birth and/or decreasing the time interval between doses.
A small group of women birthed soon after ANC administration and as a result received only one dose of ANC. These women were less likely to develop hyperglycaemia than women who did not birth until after two doses of ANC had been administered. However, it was not possible to determine if the association between ANC dose and glycaemic control was due to the single dose, or whether these women did not have time to reach peak hyperglycaemia before they gave birth.
Maternal hyperglycaemia within 24 hours of birth is associated with increased odds of approximately 1.5 for neonatal hypoglycaemia and > 2.0 for severe hypoglycaemia. Given that 30% of women birthed within 72 hours of commencement of ANC, a significant proportion of women are likely to be hyperglycaemic at the time they gave birth and their babies are at increased risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. The association between maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia is strengthened by the observation that maternal blood glucose concentration peaked from 12 to 72 hours after ANC administration and babies of women birthing from 12 hours to 48 hours after ANC administration were more likely to develop hypoglycaemia than those born before or after this period.
The reason for the increased odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia after elective caesarean section compared to vaginal birth cannot be identified from this study. However, as elective caesarean section was the most frequent mode of birth in this cohort and the use of ANC prior to elective caesarean is common [28] and increasing [29], this association is of concern.
The rate of severe maternal hyperglycaemia declined over the period of the study, potentially related to more active management of maternal glycaemic control after ANC administration latterly, despite a lack of consensus for glycaemic targets after ANC administration [7, 27, 30]. Even so, there was no significant change in the rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia over time. However, neonates born in the most recent epoch (2014 to 2016) were more likely to develop recurrent hypoglycaemia than those born in earlier epochs, even though maternal hyperglycaemia at higher thresholds (> 8 mmol/L) was less common. The last epoch coincided with the introduction of oral dextrose gel as an initial treatment for neonatal hypoglycaemia at this hospital. Oral dextrose gel has been shown to be a safe and effective method of treating neonatal hypoglycaemia, and did not increase the risk of recurrent hypoglycaemia in the original randomised trial [22]. It is possible that other aspects of neonatal care were also changing over this period, including improved screening protocols for babies at risk.
Interpretation
Maternal hyperglycaemia is common in women with DIP after ANC administration, supporting current recommendations to monitor the BGC of all women with DIP receiving ANC [7]. Our findings suggest that the BGC targets for intrapartum management are commonly exceeded after ANC administration [27, 28]. This study suggests that future research should explore whether the rate of maternal hyperglycaemia after ANC administration may be decreased by alterations in the timing of ANC administration and the dose interval. There was insufficient evidence to assess the effect of the drug used on maternal hyperglycaemia.
Both neonatal hypoglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemia are common in babies of women with DIP who receive ANC, potentially placing these babies at risk of long-term cognitive impairment [17]. The risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia is more closely related to glycaemic control immediately prior to birth than to glycaemic control after ANC. Since hyperglycaemia after ANC administration resolves after approximately 72 hours, administration of ANC more than 72 hours before birth may reduce the risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Strengths and limitations
One limitation of this study is its retrospective nature, so that all variables were not consistently available for all women and babies, and BGC testing schedules were variable. Further, the consistency of the drug and schedule of ANC, and correlation between the number of doses in a course and the time from ANC administration to birth, limited our ability to fully assess the effect of ANC variables on maternal and neonatal glycaemia. The sample size was large and was from a single centre, providing consistency but potentially reducing generalisability to hospitals with different practices. Several thresholds for maternal hyperglycaemia were assessed along with other parameters of glycaemic control, and the consistent results across all parameters of maternal glycaemic control suggest the findings are robust.
Conclusion
Maternal hyperglycaemia is common after ANC administration in women with DIP, lasts for approximately 72 hours and may be affected by the number of doses administered and the time between doses. Babies born to mothers with hyperglycaemia within 24 hours of birth are at increased risk of developing hypoglycaemia. Future studies should explore whether the risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia may be able to be reduced by tighter control of maternal glycaemia within 24 hours of birth in women with DIP.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Professor Christopher Triggs, Department of Statistics University of Auckland for statistical support, Dr Lynn Sadler, Epidemiologist, Women’s Health, Auckland District Health Board and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland for advice and database support, Dr Matthew Glasgow, Liggins Institute for undertaking the data audit and Dr Janet Rowan, Obstetric Physician, National Women’s Health, Auckland for advice and support.
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because use of the data was only approved by the ethics committee for use in this study. (Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee, Approval #16/NTB/216). A de- identified dataset and a data dictionary used in the analyses can be requested by contacting the Maternal and Perinatal Research Hub at the Liggins Institute, University of Auckland. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and have appropriate ethical approval, where necessary, to achieve the research aims in the approved proposal. Data requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement before data are released. To contact the Maternal and Perinatal Research Hub email: researchhub@auckland.ac.nz.
Funding Statement
JT received 190606-002467 Lotteries Health Research Grant. https://www.communitymatters.govt.nz/lottery-grants-board/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(3):CD004454pub3. 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jolley JA, Rajan P V, Petersen R, Fong A, Wing DA. Effect of antenatal betamethasone on blood glucose levels in women with and without diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;118:98–104. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dalfrà MG, Burlina S, Sartore G, Lapolla A. Ketoacidosis in diabetic pregnancy. J Matern Fet Neonatal Med. 2016;29(17):2889–95. 10.3109/14767058.2015.1107903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu F, Lv L, Liang Z, Wang Y, Wen J, Lin X, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring effects on maternal glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4674–82. 10.1210/jc.2013-4332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Itoh A, Saisho Y, Miyakoshi K, Fukutake M, Kasuga Y, Ochiai D, et al. Time-dependent changes in insulin requirement for maternal glycemic control during antenatal corticosteroid therapy in women with gestational diabetes: A retrospective study. Endocr J. 2016;63(1):101–4. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ15-0482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Starr J, Hogan J, Sosa ME., Carpenter M. Glucocorticoid-associated maternal hyperglycemia: A randomized trial of insulin prophylaxis. J Matern Fet Neonatal Med. 2000;9(5):273–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antenatal Corticosteroid Clinical Practice Guidelines Panel. Antenatal corticosteroids given to women prior to birth to improve fetal, infant, child and adult health: Clinical Practice Guidelines [Internet]. Auckland. New Zealand: Liggins Institute. The University of Auckland; 2015. Available from: https://www.ligginstrials.org/ANC_CPG/ [Google Scholar]
- 8.Razaz N, Skoll A, Fahey J, Allen VM, Joseph KS. Trends in optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):288–96. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuhl C, Andersen GE, Hertel J, Mølsted‐Pedersen L. Metabolic events in infants of diabetic mothers during the first 24 hours after birth I. Changes in plasma glucose, insulin and glucagon. Acta Pædiatrica. 1982;71(1):19–25. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1982.tb09366.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kenepp NB, Shelley WC, Gabbe SG, Kumar S, Stanley CA, Gutsche BB. Fetal and neonatal hazards of hydration with 5% dextrose before caesarean section. Lancet. 1982;319(8282):1150–2. 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92227-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamamoto JM, Benham J, Mohammad K, Donovan LE, Wood SL. Intrapartum glycaemic control and neonatal hypoglycaemia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2018;35(2):173–83. 10.1111/dme.13546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, Murphy KE, Amiel SA, Hunt KF, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): A multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2347–59. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mathiesen ER, Christensen A-BL, Hellmuth E, Hornnes P, Stage E, Damm P. Insulin dose during glucocorticoid treatment for fetal lung maturation in diabetic pregnancy: test of an algorithm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(9):835–9. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810906.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rowe CW, Putt E, Brentnall O, Gebuehr A, Allabyrne J, Woods A, et al. An intravenous insulin protocol designed for pregnancy reduces neonatal hypoglycaemia following betamethasone administration in women with gestational diabetes. Diabet Med. 2019;36(2):228–36. 10.1111/dme.13864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fadl HE, Östlund IKM, Magnuson AFK, Hanson USB. Maternal and neonatal outcomes and time trends of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sweden from 1991 to 2003. Diabet Med. 2010;27(4):436–41. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02978.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harris DL, Weston PJ, Harding JE. Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk. J Pediatr. 2012;161(5):787–91. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shah R, Harding J, Brown J, McKinlay C. Neonatal glycaemia and neurodevelopmental outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2019;115(2):116–26. 10.1159/000492859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pettit KE, Tran SH, Lee E, Caughey AB. The association of antenatal corticosteroids with neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia. J Matern Fet Neonatal Med. 2014;27(7):683–6. 10.3109/14767058.2013.832750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paul R, Murugesh C, Chepulis L, Tamatea J, Wolmarans L. Should antenatal corticosteroids be considered in women with gestational diabetes before planned late gestation caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(3):463–6. 10.1111/ajo.12963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom EA, Blackwell SC, Tita ATN, Reddy UM, Saade GR, et al. Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(14):1311–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1516783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tuohy JF, Bloomfield FH, Harding JE, Crowther CA. Patterns of antenatal corticosteroid administration in a cohort of women with diabetes in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harris DL, Weston PJ, Signal M, Geoff J, Chase R, Harding JE. Dextrose gel for neonatal hypoglycaemia (the Sugar Babies Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9910):2077–83. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61645-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alsweiler JM, Harding JE, Bloomfield FH. Tight glycemic control with insulin in hyperglycemic preterm babies: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):639–47. 10.1542/peds.2011-2470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Auckland District Health Board. Diabetes in Pregnancy [Internet]. Auckland New Zealand; 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 22]. Available from: http://nationalwomenshealth.adhb.govt.nz/Portals/0/Documents/Policies/Diabetes_in_Pregnancy_.pdf
- 25.Auckland District Health Board. Newborn Clinical Guideline—Hypoglycaemia management [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 20]. Available from: http://www.adhb.govt.nz/newborn/Guidelines/Nutrition/HypoglycaemiaManagement.htm
- 26.Iafusco D, Stoppoloni F, Salvia G, Vernetti G, Passaro P, Petrovski G, et al. Use of real time continuous glucose monitoring and intravenous insulin in type 1 diabetic mothers to prevent respiratory distress and hypoglycaemia in infants. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:23 10.1186/1471-2393-8-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brownfoot FC, Gagliardi DI, Bain E, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(8):CD006764pub3. 10.1002/14651858.CD006764.pub3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tuohy JF, Harding JE, Crowther CA, Bloomfield FH. Reported adherence to current antenatal corticosteroid guidelines in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(3):416–21. 10.1111/ajo.12890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Polyakov A, Cohen S, Baum M, Trickey D, Jolley D, Wallace EM. Patterns of antenatal corticosteroid prescribing 1998–2004. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(1):42–5. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00677.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: Management from preconception to the postnatal period. [Internet]. NICE; 2015. [cited 2018 May 14]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data cannot be shared publicly because use of the data was only approved by the ethics committee for use in this study. (Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee, Approval #16/NTB/216). A de- identified dataset and a data dictionary used in the analyses can be requested by contacting the Maternal and Perinatal Research Hub at the Liggins Institute, University of Auckland. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and have appropriate ethical approval, where necessary, to achieve the research aims in the approved proposal. Data requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement before data are released. To contact the Maternal and Perinatal Research Hub email: researchhub@auckland.ac.nz.