Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2021 Jan 20;288(1943):20201635. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1635

Self-clearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: implications for lifetime risk and population at-risk of tuberculosis disease

Jon C Emery 1,, Alexandra S Richards 1, Katie D Dale 2,3, C Finn McQuaid 1, Richard G White 1, Justin T Denholm 2, Rein M G J Houben 1
PMCID: PMC7893269  PMID: 33467995

Abstract

Background: it is widely assumed that individuals with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection remain at lifelong risk of tuberculosis (TB) disease. However, there is substantial evidence that self-clearance of Mtb infection can occur. We infer a curve of self-clearance by time since infection and explore its implications for TB epidemiology. Methods and findings: data for self-clearance were inferred using post-mortem and tuberculin-skin-test reversion studies. A cohort model allowing for self-clearance was fitted in a Bayesian framework before estimating the lifetime risk of TB disease and the population infected with Mtb in India, China and Japan in 2019. We estimated that 24.4% (17.8–32.6%, 95% uncertainty interval (UI)) of individuals self-clear within 10 years of infection, and 73.1% (64.6–81.7%) over a lifetime. The lifetime risk of TB disease was 17.0% (10.9–22.5%), compared to 12.6% (10.1–15.0%) assuming lifelong infection. The population at risk of TB disease in India, China and Japan was 35–80% (95% UI) smaller in the self-clearance scenario. Conclusions: the population with a viable Mtb infection may be markedly smaller than generally assumed, with such individuals at greater risk of TB disease. The ability to identify these individuals could dramatically improve the targeting of preventive programmes and inform TB vaccine development, bringing TB elimination within reach of feasibility.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, infection, self-clearance, epidemiology, mathematical modelling

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the largest cause of death by an infectious agent [1], with one-quarter of the global population estimated to have been infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) [2]. It is commonly assumed that all such individuals retain a lifelong viable infection, defined here as being at risk of TB disease in the absence of treatment and reinfection [3,4]. This is unlikely to be true, however [5,6].

A range of evidence suggests that a proportion of an initially infected cohort may self-clear their infection, defined here as meaning that their risk of TB disease in the absence of treatment and reinfection becomes effectively zero [69]. Yet, there is also historical and recent evidence for a long-term rate of TB disease that persists for many years after infection [1014].

The implications of these two observations for TB prevention are numerous. Tackling incident TB disease arising from the Mtb infected reservoir is necessary to meet World Health Organisation End TB Strategy targets [2,15,16]. However, TB prevention policies are hampered by the size of the infected reservoir as estimated by current tests, which are sensitive to historical infection and not necessarily current, viable infections [5,17]. In combination with the relatively low individual risk of TB disease and the costs and potential side-effects of preventive therapy, the cost-benefit of mass testing and treatment for infection using current tests is often unacceptable at both the individual and population levels [18].

If, however, we consider that self-clearance of Mtb infection is possible, our estimates for the population at risk of TB disease in the absence of (re)infection could be significantly reduced, as many individuals initially infected with Mtb may no longer harbour a viable infection. Moreover, because the number of people progressing to TB disease would remain unchanged, the decreased population at-risk would lead to a greater lifetime risk of TB disease in those that retain a viable infection. This would, in turn, improve the cost-benefit threshold of preventive therapy should a test for viable infection become available.

To adequately capture the process and implications of self-clearance in a population over time, and in turn, motivate research for tests of viable infection, it is crucial to provide quantitative estimates of the extent of self-clearance by time since infection. While an estimate of the highest potential proportion of individuals that may have self-cleared their infection has been provided [6], an estimate of the proportion of individuals that self-clear by time since infection is currently missing.

To infer this metric from empirical studies, data need to include an estimate for the time of initial infection, or at least enable a reasonable estimate. Examples include tuberculin skin test (TST) reversions among cohorts of initial TST-converters [8,19] as well as an absence of viable bacilli in people with a history of, but died of causes other than, TB [7,20]. As this inference relies on subjective interpretation of indirect measures of self-clearance, we consider it important to make conservative assumptions to provide a strong lower bound for self-clearance over time.

In this paper, we use a modelling approach to provide this conservative estimate of the extent of self-clearance of Mtb infection and its impact on TB epidemiology. We review the potential evidence to inform a cohort model of TB natural history before estimating two key outcomes: the increase in lifetime risk of TB disease following infection for those who retain a viable infection; and the decrease in the population with a viable infection in three epidemiologically distinct settings of India, China and Japan.

2. Methods

(a). Data for self-clearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

To find suitable evidence, we considered reviews of the spectrum of Mtb infection and TB disease published in the last decade [17,2129] before extracting references seemingly pertinent to self-clearance of infection and references therein. We also considered specific references [6,3036] known to the authors and references therein. We only considered studies in humans in which individuals received no chemotherapeutic treatment or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-vaccination (see the electronic supplementary material for further details of the literature review).

Following the review, two principal sources of evidence were found to be suitable for inferring self-clearance by time since infection. Firstly, TST-reversion studies, where we interpret a transition from TST-positive to TST-negative as waning of the adaptive immune response as a result of clearance of Mtb in the host. Studies had to report a time of initial TST conversion (i.e. becoming positive on a TST) or be among initially TST-positive children to provide a reasonable prior for the age, and therefore, time of infection. Individuals then had to be retested after a stated time interval. We inferred the proportion of individuals that cleared their infection from the proportion that TST-reverted upon retest. In line with our aim, this would probably represent a lower bound for self-clearance, because it is possible that some individuals may retain an immune response in the absence of a viable infection [6].

Secondly, we used autopsy studies that attempted to identify viable Mtb bacilli in the lungs of individuals that had histopathology consistent with a historic active infection but died of causes other than TB. We inferred the proportion of individuals that cleared their infection from the proportion in which no viable bacilli could be identified via culture and/or guinea pig inoculation. Historical annual risk of infection (ARI) estimates were then used to provide a reasonable prior on the average age at first infection, and hence the average time since first infection, for each age group (see the model description in the following section for further details).

Data from eligible studies were reviewed for potential further biases that could lead to an overestimate of the extent of self-clearance and, where necessary, we made the more conservative selection. To mitigate against small, chance reversions caused by test instability [37], we selected only transitions from indurations of 10 mm or more to 5 mm or less. Similarly, to avoid biases caused by potential TST boosting or persistent non-converters [38], we opted for studies with fewest repeat TSTs. Finally, to provide more robust estimates, the age-group specific results were only extracted if the group consisted of at least 30 individuals.

Self-clearance can also be estimated under certain assumptions from the number of TST-positive individuals that do not develop TB disease following immunosuppression [6]. We did not include such data, however, because estimating the average time since infection is more problematic for contemporary immunosuppression studies, where transmission is highly heterogeneous both geographically and temporally [39]. Moreover, because most of these cohorts have comorbidities sufficient to require immunosuppression, individuals with a viable infection are more likely to have progressed to TB disease before being immunosuppressed. Overall, while such studies can, therefore, provide a useful upper bound for self-clearance of infection in the general population, they are at odds with our aim to provide a robust lower bound of self-clearance by time since infection.

(b). Cohort model and lifetime risk of tuberculosis disease

A simple deterministic, compartmental model of TB natural history was used to represent a cohort of simultaneously infected people (see figure 1 and table 1). All individuals are modelled to be infected at a given age before either progressing rapidly to TB disease through the ‘fast progression' infected compartment or more gradually through the ‘slow progression' infected compartment, as is common in models of TB natural history [3,4]. Conversely, individuals may clear their infection, again through either of the two infected compartments. From here, they are no longer at risk of TB disease in the absence of reinfection. Background mortality is included to account for death from causes other than TB. For simplicity, and to retain conservative estimates, we did not include reinfection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Cohort model of TB natural history allowing for self-clearance of Mtb infection. A description of the model is provided in the main text and the parameters are detailed in table 1. Note that ai can represent either the age at infection of the TST-reversion cohort (aTST) or the autopsy cohort (aAUT). Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TST, tuberculin skin test.

Table 1.

Cohort-model parameters, descriptions and estimated posterior values for the self-clearance and lifelong Mtb infection scenarios. (Values are the percentiles taken from the estimated marginal posterior parameter distributions. Parameter symbols are illustrated in the model diagram in figure 1.)

self-clearance of Mtb infection
lifelong Mtb infection
parameter description (units) 50% 2.5% 97.5% 50% 2.5% 97.5%
fd rate of progression to TB disease from infected (fast progression) (per year) 0.0859 0.0696 0.111 0.0832 0.0676 0.116
fs rate of transition from infected (fast progression) to infected (slow progression) (per year) 0.919 0.717 1.25 0.870 0.674 1.26
sd rate of progression to TB disease from infected (slow progression) (per year) 0.000622 0.000135 0.00113 0.000269 0.0000416 0.000525
sc rate of self-clearance from infected (slow progression) (per year) 0.0330 0.0254 0.0467 0.00a 0.00a 0.00a
fc rate of self-clearance from infected (fast progression) (per year) 1.40 × 10–6 2.90 × 10–7 2.61 × 10–6 0.00a 0.00a 0.00a
aAUT age at which autopsy cohort is first infected (years) 14.1 8.97 18.3 14.1a 8.97a 18.3a
aTST age at which TST-reversion cohort is first infected (years) 4.92 0.971 6.88 4.92a 0.971a 6.88a
μ mean background life expectancy (years) 60.0a 60.0a 60.0a 60.0a 60.0a 60.0a
ν standard deviation of background life expectancy (years) 10.0a 10.0a 10.0a 10.0a 10.0a 10.0a

aDenotes input values. TB, tuberculosis; Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TST, tuberculin skin test.

The model was simultaneously fitted to data on the proportion of individuals that self-cleared infection by time since birth or progressed to TB disease by time since infection. Data for self-clearance was inferred from the studies identified in the preceding subsection [7,8] (see the results section and electronic supplementary material for further details). To account for potentially different ages of first infection between the studies, the model was simultaneously fitted to TST-reversion and autopsy data with the same natural history parameters but independent ages of infection. Data for progression to TB disease was taken from the placebo arm of the British Medical Research Council's BCG vaccine trials [10,40,41]. For greater than 10 years post-infection, we used a distal progression risk of 20 per 100 000 per year applied to the BCG vaccine placebo group as if infection remains lifelong (which is how distal progression risks are measured and presented) and is representative of the values found in the literature [4244] (see the electronic supplementary material for further details). Background mortality was modelled using a gamma distribution, described by a mean life expectancy of 60 years with a standard deviation of 10 years. These values are broadly representative of current survival curves in low- and middle-income countries [45] and more likely to reflect the survival curves in the historical studies used. Table 1 summarizes the model parameters.

Model fitting was performed in a Bayesian framework using a flat prior over 0–7 years for the age at infection for the TST-reversion cohort, as detailed in the associated study [8]. The prior for the age at infection for the autopsy cohort was calculated by assuming a normal distribution for the contextual ARI of the study [7], informed by historical TST surveys among adolescents (see the electronic supplementary material for further details). A flat prior was used for all other varied model parameters.

A beta function was used to characterise the likelihood function comparing model outcomes with data on self-clearance and progression to TB disease. A delayed-rejection, adaptive-Metropolis Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was used to generate posterior estimates for the model parameters. Each fitting procedure consisted of a 500 iteration burn in, followed by a chain of 5000 further iterations. Results for the median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals for the posterior model parameters were then generated from these chains.

The model was then run 125 times, sampling from the posterior model parameters. The median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals for the proportion of the cohort that self-clear infection and the cumulative risk of TB disease among individuals that retain a viable infection, both over time since infection, were then calculated. To arrive at the latter, the risk of TB disease during each time step is calculated by dividing the number of individuals that progressed to TB disease during the time step by the number of individuals that had a viable infection at the beginning of the time step, before integrating over the desired timescale following infection.

For purposes of comparison, the above analysis was repeated assuming lifelong infection (i.e. the self-clearance rates fc and sc were set to 0 per year) and the model was fitted to progression to TB disease data only. To make appropriate comparisons, we use as an input the posterior results for the age at infection from the self-clearance scenario.

Finally, independent sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of the assumed risk of distal progression to TB disease (using 5 and 35/100 000 yr−1) and the mean life expectancy of the cohort (using 50 and 70 years).

(c). Country-level model and population at risk of tuberculosis disease

To estimate the age-specific population with a viable Mtb infection in a given country for a particular year, we applied the cohort model to consecutive 5-year birth cohorts, analogous to the approach for estimating the global burden of latent TB infection in [2] (see the electronic supplementary material for further details). A time-dependent force of infection was applied to each cohort using ARI estimates, which were derived by re-performing the Gaussian process regression in [2]. We used only the median estimated ARI in each country, because the focus of this work is to illustrate the relative difference between the population with a viable infection in the self-clearance and lifelong infection scenarios, not estimates of absolute numbers. To parametrize the TB natural history components of the model, the posterior parameter values derived from the single cohort model were used. Uncertainty in the results was then solely owing to that of the natural history parameters.

We applied the model to three epidemiologically distinct settings: India, China and Japan. Japan, for example, has an older population and less recent transmission compared to China, and in turn compared to India. All three countries also have a sufficiently low prevalence of HIV infection as to not require modification of the TB natural history components of the model presented in figure 1.

For each setting, the model was run 125 times, sampling from the posterior model parameters. The median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals for the population with a viable Mtb infection in 2019 was calculated, by age as well as overall. For purposes of comparison, the above analysis was repeated assuming lifelong infection.

All analyses were conducted using R v. 3.5.0 [46]. Modelling and Bayesian fitting were performed using the deSolve [47] and FME packages [48], respectively. Plots were constructed using the ggplot2 [49] package. Replication data and analysis scripts are available on GitHub.

3. Results

(a). Data for self-clearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

In total, four studies met our initial criteria for inferring self-clearance by time since infection, two of which were TST reversion studies [8,19] and the other two autopsy studies [7,20].

Of the TST-reversion studies, Adams et al. [19] included a significant proportion of individuals that could have undergone at least five TSTs in under 2 years. Such a high rate of testing could result in bias owing to effects such as boosting [38]. To provide the more conservative estimate, we use only the results of Ferebee [8], in which initially TST-positive children were retested after a 10-year interval. Figure 2a shows this data presented over time since infection. Uncertainty in the horizontal axis reflects the 95% uncertainty interval of the estimate for the age of infection of the TST-reversion cohort, while the uncertainty in the vertical axis represents the equal-tailed 95% confidence interval of the data.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Cohort model results showing data for self-clearance of Mtb infection and progression to TB disease over time since infection. The figure shows the cohort model fitted to data on self-clearance of Mtb infection (a) and progression to TB disease (b) presented over time since infection. Data in (a) consist of TST studies (crosses) and autopsy studies (points). Uncertainty in the horizontal axis reflects the 95% uncertainty interval for the estimate for the age of infection. Uncertainty in the data in the vertical axes in both panels are the equal-tailed 95% confidence intervals. Model fits are median model output and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals. Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TB, tuberculosis; TST, tuberculin skin test. (Online version in colour.)

Of the two autopsy studies, Feldman & Baggenstoss [20] considered only the lesions found in the lung and their surrounding tissues, while Opie & Aronson [7] considered both the lesions and the bulk of the lung. This is the likely reason why Opie & Aronson identified viable Mtb bacilli in a markedly greater proportion of individuals, and to provide a more conservative estimate of self-clearance, we extracted data from this study only. Figure 2a shows this data presented over time since infection. The data have been aggregated into three age groups, where only groups with greater than 30 individuals have been included. The uncertainty in the horizontal axis reflects the 95% uncertainty interval of the estimate for the age of infection of the autopsy cohort, while the uncertainty in the vertical axis represents the equal-tailed 95% confidence interval of the data.

Owing to a paucity of data, we could not further disaggregate by sex, location (e.g. high versus low burden setting), or age at infection.

(b). Cohort model and lifetime risk of tuberculosis disease

Table 1 shows the median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals for the posterior model parameters for both the case of self-clearance and lifelong infection. Prior versus posterior model parameters are presented in the electronic supplementary material, table S4.

Figure 2 shows the results of the cohort-model allowing for self-clearance of infection, fitted to the self-clearance and progression to disease data, including the median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S4 for the model fitting results assuming lifelong infection). As such, we estimate 24.4% (17.8–32.6%, 95% uncertainty interval (UI)) of individuals self-clear within 10 years of infection and 73.1% (64.6–81.7%, 95% UI) over a lifetime.

This translates into a lifetime risk of TB disease following infection, in those that retain a viable infection, of 17.0% (10.9–22.5%, 95% UI), compared to 12.6% (10.1–15.0%, 95% UI) in the standard scenario of lifelong infection.

(c). Country-level models and population at risk of tuberculosis disease

Figure 3 shows the estimated number of people with a viable Mtb infection in India, China and Japan in 2019, disaggregated by age. Red outlines show the results assuming lifelong infection and red-filled show the results allowing for self-clearance of infection. Illustrated are the median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals. The impact of self-clearance is most pronounced in older age groups.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Country-level model results for the number of people with a viable Mtb infection in the lifelong infection and self-clearance scenarios. (a–c) The estimated population at risk of TB disease in 2019 disaggregated by age in three epidemiologically distinct settings for the cases of lifelong Mtb infection (red outlined) and self-clearance (red filled). (d) The total population with a viable infection in each setting, assuming self-clearance, expressed as a percentage of the total population with a viable infection assuming lifelong infection. Point values and error bars show median and equal-tailed 95% uncertainty intervals from the model outputs. Note that median estimates for the historical ARI have been used, such that uncertainty presented in the results is associated with uncertainty in the natural history model parameters only (table 1). For clarity, uncertainty in the lifelong infection results is not shown because they are much smaller than in the self-clearance scenario. Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; ARI, annual risk of infection. (Online version in colour.)

Figure 3 also shows the total population with a viable Mtb infection in each setting allowing for self-clearance of infection, expressed as a percentage of the population with a viable infection assuming infection is lifelong. The impact is smallest in India (56%, 47–65% UI), followed by China (37%, 28–47% UI), with the greatest impact in Japan (27%, 20–37% UI).

See the electronic supplementary material, figures S5–8 and tables S5–12 for the results of sensitivity analyses performed using different mean life expectancies and risks of distal progression to TB disease. Neither sensitivity makes a qualitative difference to our results, though the results are more sensitive to the assumed life expectancy than the risk of distal progression to TB disease.

4. Discussion

We have shown that self-clearance of Mtb infection is likely to have a significant impact on TB epidemiology. Our results provide a robust lower-bound estimate, with at least 24.4% (17.8–32.6%, 95% UI) of individuals self-clearing within 10 years of infection, and 73.1% (64.6–81.7%, 95% UI) over a lifetime. Owing to the smaller population with a viable infection, the lifetime risk of TB disease among individuals retaining a viable infection is 17.0% (10.9–22.5%, 95% UI), a non-trivial increase compared to 12.6% (10.1–15.0%, 95% UI) using the prevailing assumption of lifelong infection. Moreover, the populations with a viable infection across the epidemiologically diverse settings of India, China and Japan are 35–80% (95% UI) smaller in the self-clearance scenario. Reductions are most pronounced in settings with an ageing population and less recent transmission (i.e. Japan), as more time has elapsed for people to self-clear remote infections and there are fewer recent infections.

With respect to related studies, Behr et al. recently estimated that over 90% of remotely infected individuals have cleared their infection, among cohorts of TST-positive individuals undergoing immunosuppression [6]. Our work, intended to provide a robust lower bound before exploring the resultant epidemiological implications, finds a lower, albeit still substantial, result for the extent of such self-clearance.

One immediate implication of our work is that a significant proportion of the 1.7 billion people currently estimated to be at risk of TB disease [2] are likely to have cleared their infection, such that the global number should be revised, or at least re-interpreted. Within that reduced number however, the increased risk of developing TB disease would improve the risk/benefit of preventive therapy programmes, particularly if used in conjunction with current methods for identifying high-risk groups [50]. More widely, self-clearance of infection, and whether those that have self-cleared have any protection from future reinfection, will have implications for mathematical modelling of TB natural history and interventions as a whole. Results of pre- versus post-infection novel vaccine candidate models, for example, will need to carefully consider the characteristics of those that have self-cleared their infection [51] as will analyses estimating the impact and cost-effectiveness of preventive therapy [52]. Importantly, however, any potential benefits of self-clearance will depend on developing and validating a test for viable Mtb infection that can outperform the positive predictive value of TSTs.

Our analysis has a number of potential limitations primarily owing to the absence of a validated test of viable infection, necessitating instead the indirect inference of self-clearance. With respect to TST-reversion studies, while it seems reasonable that a large reversion implies waning of the sensitization response as a result of clearance of infection, this is not always the case, as in Noguera-Julian et al. [53] whereby immunosuppression suppresses TST reactivity. Moreover, test instability can result in small chance reversions [37], which we partially mitigated against by requiring a reversion from an induration greater than 10 mm to one less than 5 mm. The possibility of false negative results remains, however. The lack of reversion in some participants after preventive therapy in a study by Houk et al. [54] should also be considered, although groups in the same study that started preventive therapy shortly after TST conversion did exhibit significant reversion thereafter. In either case, isoniazid is known to have limited ability to sterilize (i.e. fully clear) Mtb infection, at least in individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus [55], such that TST reversion may not necessarily be expected following Isoniazid preventive therapy alone. Finally, it is possible that some individuals were re-infected after initially self-clearing and reverting their TST during the 10-year follow up in [8], thus underestimating the extent of reversion and self-clearance.

Our use of autopsy studies to infer self-clearance also has certain limitations. Even though we chose the study with the most extensive exploration of the lung, it may be possible that viable Mtb bacilli could be found elsewhere. While Mtb DNA has been identified outside of the lung [56,57], identification of DNA does not equate to viable bacilli, and it remains unclear as to whether such reservoirs could seed future disease in the lung. Estimating the age of infection of the cohorts relied on ARI estimates for the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in the USA. While uncertain, it is accepted that the high ARI during this period was sufficient to assume all cohorts were first infected during adolescence. We also explicitly accounted for the uncertainty in the time since infection in our analysis.

Reinfection will have probably occurred in both data sources given the high background ARI in both contexts, which we did not consider in our modelling. Including reinfection would lead us to increase our estimate for the extent of self-clearance, either owing to secondary conversions among TST-reverters (TST reversion studies), or by estimating the time since last infection as opposed to the time since first infection (autopsy studies). As a consequence, the case is strengthened for our results providing a robust lower-bound estimate of self-clearance.

With respect to our cohort model, we explored parameter uncertainty that could materially alter our results. These were the assumed value for the rate of distal progression to TB disease and the life expectancy of the cohort. Independent sensitivity analyses found that none of these assumptions qualitatively altered our conclusions (see the electronic supplementary material).

Several open questions remain. While we have used TST-reversions to infer self-clearance of infection, in principle, they should also be factored into the ARI estimated from TST survey data among children, as has been considered in [37,58]. For our purposes, while this short-term self-clearance among children would increase the estimated ARI and in turn the number of people at risk of TB disease, the long-term self-clearance of infection in adults would probably outweigh this effect and still lead to a net reduction with respect to the assumption of lifelong infection. The wider issue of incorporating TST-reversions into the standard methodology for estimating ARIs has yet to be addressed, however [59]. Finally, it is unclear how self-clearance affects the protection afforded by previous Mtb infection [60], which will be a key input for transmission models intending to include self-clearance.

Our results highlight the urgent need for development and validation of a test for viable Mtb infection that can outperform the positive predictive value of TSTs. Such a tool would enable study of the immunology and epidemiology of self-clearance and in turn improve TB vaccine design and the targeting of preventive programmes. While research into correlates of risk to discern those most at risk of TB disease is ongoing [61,62], similar efforts to identify those least at risk would be similarly prudent [63]. Thereafter, in order to understand the impact of self-clearance on transmission and inform vaccine strategy development, it is important to better understand whether, and by how much, self-clearance of infection provides protection from future reinfection.

5. Conclusion

Owing to self-clearance of Mtb infection, the population with a viable infection may be markedly smaller than generally assumed, with fewer individuals retaining a viable infection and yet each at greater risk of TB disease. Coupling these wide-ranging implications for TB epidemiology with the ability to identify individuals that have self-cleared could dramatically improve the targeting of preventive programmes and inform TB vaccine design, bringing TB elimination within reach of feasibility.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials
rspb20201635supp1.docx (1.8MB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Data accessibility

Replication data and analyses scripts are available on GitHub at https://github.com/epidemery/mtb_self_clearance.

Authors' contributions

R.M.G.J.H. conceived research; J.C.E. and R.M.G.J.H. designed the methodology; J.C.E. performed the analysis; J.C.E. and R.M.G.J.H. prepared the original draft of the paper; all authors provided detailed feedback on the methodology and analysis; all authors reviewed and edited drafts of the paper.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

We received no funding for this study.

References

  • 1.WHO. 2019 Global Tuberculosis Report. 2019. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2019. (13 December 2019).
  • 2.Houben RMGJ, Dodd PJ. 2016. The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: a re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS Med. 13, e1002152 ( 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002152) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ragonnet R, et al. 2017. Optimally capturing latency dynamics in models of tuberculosis transmission. Epidemics 21, 39–47. ( 10.1016/j.epidem.2017.06.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Menzies NA, et al. 2018. Progression from latent infection to active disease in dynamic tuberculosis transmission models: a systematic review of the validity of modelling assumptions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 228–238. ( 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30134-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mack U, et al. 2009. LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection or lasting immune responses to M. tuberculosis? A TBNET consensus statement. Eur. Respir. J. 33, 956–973. ( 10.1183/09031936.00120908) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Behr MA, Edelstein PH, Ramakrishnan L. 2019. Is Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection life long? Br. Med. J. 367, I5770 ( 10.1136/bmj.I5770) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Opie EL, Aronson JD. 1927. Tubercule bacilli in latent tuberculosis lesions and in lung tissue without tuberculosis lesions. Arch. Pathol. 4, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferebee SH 1970. Controlled chemoprophylaxis trials in tuberculosis. A general review. Bibl. Tuberc. 26, 28–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin PL, et al. 2014. Sterilization of granulomas is common in active and latent tuberculosis despite within-host variability in bacterial killing. Nat. Med. 20, 75–79. ( 10.1038/nm.3412) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sutherland I 1976. Recent studies in the epidemiology of tuberculosis, based on the risk of being infected with tubercle bacilli. Adv. Tuberc. Res. 19, 1–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Canetti G, Sutherland I, Svandova E. 1972. Endogenous reactivation and exogenous reinfection: their relative importance with regard to the development of non-primary tuberculosis. Bull. Int. Union Tuberc. 47, 116–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vynnycky E, Fine PE. 1997. The natural history of tuberculosis: the implications of age-dependent risks of disease and the role of reinfection. Epidemiol. Infect. 119, 183–201. ( 10.1017/S0950268897007917) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horsburgh CR, et al. 2010. Revisiting rates of reactivation tuberculosis: a population-based approach. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 182, 420–425. ( 10.1164/rccm.200909-1355OC) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lillebaek T, et al. 2002. Molecular evidence of endogenous reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after 33 years of latent infection. J. Infect. Dis. 185, 401–404. ( 10.1086/338342) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reid MJA, et al. 2019. Building a tuberculosis-free world: the lancet commission on tuberculosis. Lancet 393, 1331–1384. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30024-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Uplekar M, et al. 2015. WHO's new end TB strategy. Lancet 385, 1799–1801. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60570-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pai M., et al. , 2016. Tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2, 16076 ( 10.1038/nrdp.2016.76) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Denholm J, Matteelli A, Reis A. 2015. Latent tuberculous infection: ethical considerations in formulating public health policy. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 19, 137–140. ( 10.5588/ijtld.14.0543) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adams JM, et al. 1959. Reversal of tuberculin reaction in early tuberculosis. Dis. Chest 35, 348–356. ( 10.1378/chest.35.4.348) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feldman WH, Baggenstoss AH. 1938. The residual infectivity of the primary complex of tuberculosis. Am. J. Pathol. 14, 473–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barry CE, et al. 2009. The spectrum of latent tuberculosis: rethinking the biology and intervention strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 845–855. ( 10.1038/nrmicro2236) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Young DB, Gideon HP, Wilkinson RJ. 2009. Eliminating latent tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol. 17, 183–188. ( 10.1016/j.tim.2009.02.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2010. Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target. J. Immunol. 185, 15–22. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.0903856) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Esmail H, Barry CE, Wilkinson RJ. 2012. Understanding latent tuberculosis: the key to improved diagnostic and novel treatment strategies. Drug Discov. Today 17, 514–521. ( 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.12.013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Esmail H, Barry CE, Young DB, Wilkinson RJ. 2014. The ongoing challenge of latent tuberculosis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130437 ( 10.1098/rstb.2013.0437) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dheda K, Barry CE, Maartens G. 2016. Tuberculosis. Lancet 387, 1211–1226. ( 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00151-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Behr MA, Edelstein PH, Ramakrishnan L. 2018. Revisiting the timetable of tuberculosis. Br. Med. J. 362, k2738 ( 10.1136/bmj.k2738) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drain PK, et al. 2018. Incipient and subclinical tuberculosis: a clinical review of early stages and progression of infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31, e00021-18 ( 10.1128/CMR.00021-18) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2018. The end of the binary era: revisiting the spectrum of tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 201, 2541–2548. ( 10.4049/jimmunol.1800993) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Keller AE, Kampmeier RH. 1939. Tuberculin survey. Observations on medical students and undergraduate nurses at Vanderbilt University. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 39, 657–665. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maclouf A 1946. The yearly persistence of cutaneous sensibility to tuberculin. Rev. Path. Comparee et Hyg. Gen. 46, 241–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Johnston RN, Ritchie RT, Murray IHF. 1963. Declining tuberculin sensitivity with advancing age. Br. Med. J. 2, 720–724. ( 10.1136/bmj.2.5359.720) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mysakowska H, et al. 1966. An appraisal of the chemoprophylaxis of tuberculosis in the student population of Lublin, Poland, following thirty months' observation. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 93, 628–629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sepkowitz KA 1996. Tuberculin skin testing and the health care worker: lessons of the Prophit Survey. Tuber. Lung Dis. 77, 81–85. ( 10.1016/S0962-8479(96)90081-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hawn TR, et al. 2014. Tuberculosis vaccines and prevention of infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 650–671. ( 10.1128/MMBR.00021-14) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nduba V, Van't Hoog AH, Mitchell EMH, Borgdorff M, Laserson KF. 2018. Incidence of active tuberculosis and cohort retention among adolescents in Western Kenya. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 37, 10–15. ( 10.1097/INF.0000000000001685) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fine PE, et al. 1999. Tuberculin sensitivity: conversions and reversions in a rural African population. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 3, 962–975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Menzies D 1999. Interpretation of repeated tuberculin tests. Boosting, conversion, and reversion. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 159, 15–21. ( 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9801120) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Public Health England. 2018. Tuberculosis in England - 2018 report See https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tuberculosis-in-england-annual-report.
  • 40.Sutherland I 1968. The ten-year incidence of clinical tuberculosis following ‘conversion’ in 2,550 individuals aged 14 to 19 at time of conversion. The Hague, The Netherlands: Tuberculosis Surveillance Research Unit. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sutherland I, Svandova E, Radhakrishna S. 1982. The development of clinical tuberculosis following infection with tubercle bacilli. Tubercle 63, 255–268. ( 10.1016/S0041-3879(82)80013-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dale KD, Trauer JM, Dodd PJ, Houben RMGJ, Denholm JT. 2019. Estimating long-term tuberculosis reactivation rates in Australian migrants. Clin. Infect. Dis. 70, 2111–2118. ( 10.1093/cid/ciz569) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ronald LA, et al. 2018. Demographic predictors of active tuberculosis in people migrating to British Columbia, Canada: a retrospective cohort study. Canadian Med. Assoc. J. 190, E209–E216. ( 10.1503/cmaj.170817) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Styblo K 1991. Selected papers (Vol 24). The Hague, The Netherlands: KNCV.
  • 45.United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019. World Population Prospects 2019, Online Edition. (December 18, 2019).
  • 46.R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; See http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Soetaert K, Petzoldt T, Setzer RW. 2010. Solving Differential Equations in R : package deSolve. J. Stat. Soft. 33, 1–28. ( 10.18637/jss.v033.i03) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Soetaert K, Petzoldt T. 2010. Inverse modelling, sensitivity and Monte Carlo analysis in R using Package FME. J. Stat. Soft. 33, 1–28. ( 10.18637/jss.v033.i03) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wickham H 2016. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.WHO. 2018. Latent tuberculosis infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; (17 December 2019). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Harris RC, et al. 2019. Age-targeted tuberculosis vaccination in China and implications for vaccine development: a modelling study. Lancet Global Health 7, e209–e218. ( 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30452-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Johnson KT, Churchyard GJ, Sohn H, Dowdy DW. 2018. Cost-effectiveness of preventive therapy for tuberculosis with isoniazid and rifapentine versus isoniazid alone in high-burden settings. Clin. Infect. Dis. 67, 1072–1078. ( 10.1093/cid/ciy230) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Noguera-Julian A, et al. 2019. Tuberculosis disease in children and adolescents on therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents: a collaborative, multi-centre paediatric tuberculosis network European trials group (ptbnet) study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 2561–2569. ( 10.1093/cid/ciz1138) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Houk VN, Kent DC, Sorensen K, Baker JH. 1968. The eradication of tuberculosis infection by isoniazid chemoprophylaxis. Arch. Environ. Health 16, 46–50. ( 10.1080/00039896.1968.10665013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Houben RMGJ, Sumner T, Grant AD, White RG. 2014. Ability of preventive therapy to cure latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected individuals in high-burden settings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5325–5330. ( 10.1073/pnas.1317660111) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tornack J, et al. 2017. Human and mouse hematopoietic stem cells are a depot for dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 12, e0169119 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0169119) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Neyrolles O, et al. 2006. Is adipose tissue a place for Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence? PLoS ONE 1, e43 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0000043) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sutherland T 1971. The effect of tuberculin reversion upon the estimate of the annual risk of tuberculous infection. Selected Pap. R. Netherlands Tuberc. Assoc. 14, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cauthen GM, Pio A, ten Dam HG. 2002. Annual risk of tuberculous infection. 1988. Bull. World Health Organ. 80, 503–511; discussion 501–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Andrews JR, et al. 2012. Risk of progression to active tuberculosis following reinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54, 784–791. ( 10.1093/cid/cir951) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Petruccioli E, et al. 2016. Correlates of tuberculosis risk: predictive biomarkers for progression to active tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. 48, 1751–1763. ( 10.1183/13993003.01012-2016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fiore-Gartland A, et al. 2018. Considerations for biomarker-targeted intervention strategies for tuberculosis disease prevention. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 109, 61–68. ( 10.1016/j.tube.2017.11.009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Broderick C2019. Transcriptomic responses to preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection. In Conf. TBSCIENCE 2019, Hyderabad, India, 29 October, 2019.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials
rspb20201635supp1.docx (1.8MB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Data Availability Statement

Replication data and analyses scripts are available on GitHub at https://github.com/epidemery/mtb_self_clearance.


Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES