Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences logoLink to Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
. 2021 Jan;24(1):116–122. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2020.49486.11313

The dry powder formulation of mixed cross-linked dextran microspheres and tetanus toxoid-loaded trimethyl chitosan nanospheres as a potent adjuvant for nasal delivery system

Mona Kabiri 1,2,3, Haleh Bolourian 2, Solmaz Dehghan 1,4, Mohsen Tafaghodi 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC7894627  PMID: 33643579

Abstract

Objective(s):

The present study aimed to determine the immunoadjuvant efficacy of mixed cross-linked dextran microspheres (CDM) and tetanus toxoid (TT)-loaded trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanospheres in dry powder form.

Materials and Methods:

The TMC nanoparticles (NPs) containing TT were produced using the ionic gelation method. Co-administration of TT-loaded TMC NPs and CDM as an absorption enhancer was performed to improve immunity against the antigen. Dry powder formulations were delivered via the nasal route in a rabbit model.

Results:

Among immunization groups, mixing of CDM with TT encapsulated in TMC NPs could elicit the highest titer of systemic IgG antibody. Furthermore, the addition of CDM to TT-loaded TMC enhanced the sIgA response relative to the TT solution.

Conclusion:

The TMC NPs had a considerable effect on mucosal and systemic immunity against the TT antigen. Therefore, the CDM excipient can be utilized for nasal immunization to elevate systemic and mucosal responses.

Key Words: Cross-linked dextran – microspheres, Mucosal immunity, Nasal immunization, Systemic responses, Tetanus toxoid, Trimethyl chitosan - nanoparticles

Introduction

Most of the present vaccines are developed to deliver the formulation in a systemic manner such as intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or intradermal (ID). The current vaccine formulations are administered parenterally to promote cellular and humoral immunity against pathogens. The parenteral vaccine cannot contact with a mucosal barrier to induce mucosal immunity due to the functional difference between the mucosal and systemic immune systems. On the other hand, the administration of vaccines via nasal route stimulates systemic immunity and robust mucosal immune response (1-3). Therefore, the nasal administration is applied as an alternative approach to parenteral injections to deliver peptides, proteins, and drugs. The nasal delivery of vaccines has many advantages such as low enzymatic activity, high vascularity, and effective absorption via the surface of the nasal cavity and a porous endothelial membrane. Additionally, the storage, distribution, and mass vaccination of dry powder formulations by nasal delivery are simple and economical compared to liquid vaccines (3-6). The vaccine formulations delivered by nasal route contact with nasal mucosa as the first site of interaction between antigen and host, as well as the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) of the nasal cavity, which is essential to defend mucosal surfaces against pathogens. NALT contains the microfold-cells (M-cells), T-cell, B-cell, macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and other lymphoid cells to elicit and regulate mucosal immune response against inhaled antigens (7-9).

Chitosan (CHT) is a non-toxic and hydrophilic cationic polysaccharide chemically derived by the partial deacetylation of chitin with biodegradable and biocompatible properties. CHT nanoparticles (NPs) and derivatives have potential applications as the controlled release drug and antigen delivery systems (10-12). CHT NPs can enhance membrane permeability and bioavailability of macromolecules. According to the immunohistological investigations, CHT can open the tight junctions of epithelial cells to transit across the mucosal barrier (13-16). Additionally, the electrostatic interactions between positive charges of CHT and negative charges of cell membranes or mucus could induce systemic and mucosal immunity against antigens (17, 18). The nasal perfusion and pulse-chase studies illustrated that CHT had no effect on the cellular or membrane damage in mouse models. The muco-adhesive and paracellular transport effects of CHT and its derivatives are significant parameters for the efficient delivery of vaccines by intranasal administration (12, 19-22).

The N-trimethyl CHT (TMC) is a quaternized CHT derivative that improves physicochemical properties such as water solubility in a broader pH range relative to the CHT polymer (23, 24). The quaternization degree of TMC is dependent on the synthesized conditions and duration of the reactions (25-27). TMC particles as the potent absorption enhancer for the peptides and proteins can facilitate the paracellular diffusion of peptides due to opening the tight junctions of epithelial cells. Based on previous investigations, TMC has appropriate muco-adhesive properties that elevate the transport of peptides and proteins relative to the CHT (19, 28-33). TMC has been demonstrated to be a proper delivery system for the intranasal administration of vaccine formulations. Different approaches have been utilized to enhance the mucosal uptake of inhaled antigens including the usage of cross-linked dextran microspheres (CDM) with absorption enhancing properties to improve the immunogenicity and efficacy of mucosal vaccines (34-37).

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the immune efficacy of encapsulated tetanus toxoid (TT) antigen as a model antigen in TMC NPs with CDM as a penetration enhancer to induce the mucosal and systemic responses followed by the nasal administration in a rabbit model.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The alum-adsorbed TT (50 Lf/m) and TT (2750 Lf/ml) solutions were provided by Razi Institute (Iran). CHT (MW 120 kDa, and deacetylation degree 93%) was purchased from Primex (Norway) to synthesize the TMC polymer. Additionally, CDM (Sephadex G-150) was obtained from Biogen (Sweden). Tripolyphosphate (TPP), Lactose, Span 80, and Tween 80 were used from the Merck group (Germany). Anti-rabbit secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories Inc. (USA) and Sigma company (USA), respectively. Coomassie Brilliant Blue was obtained from Fluka (Switzerland). The Micro BCA assay kit was purchased from Pierce (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and all other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Synthesis and characteristics of TMC polymer

TMC polymer was synthesized using the methylation of CHT through the two-step procedure as described previously by Sieval et al, 1998 (38). The obtained TMC was dialyzed against distilled water at 4 °C for 3 days followed by lyophilizing at -54 °C (Heto, Denmark). The purified TMC polymer was characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in deionized water at 80 °C (25, 38). The degree of quaternization (DQ) was determined according to the follows:

DQ (%)=[[(CH3)3]/[H] × 1/9 ] × 100

 (1)

[(CH3)3] is the integral of the trimethyl amino group at 3.3 ppm and [H] is the integral of the 1 H peaks of TMC polymer between 4.7 and 5.7 ppm (38).

Preparation and characterization of TMC nanoparticles

TMC NPs containing TT were produced by the ionic gelation method (25). Briefly, the TMC solution (2 mg/ml) with 1% Tween 80 (w/v) was prepared in distilled water. Afterward, the TPP solution (1 mg/ml) was added dropwise to the TMC solution until the appearance of turbidity. TT-loaded TMC nanospheres were produced via dissolving TT antigen in the polymer solution (120 Lf of TT in 5 ml TMC), followed by adding the TPP solution. Nanospheres were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min and pellets were resuspended in 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4. The particle size and surface charge of TMC NPs were measured using photon correlation spectroscopy by Zetasizer (Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments, UK). The experiments were accomplished at least in triplicates.

SDS-PAGE analysis of TT entrapped in TMC nanospheres

The integrity of TT-loaded TMC NPs was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) technique. All samples were loaded on a 10% acrylamide gel and the silver nitrate staining was used to visualize the bands of protein.

Loading efficiency of TT antigen in TMC nanoparticles

The TT-loaded TMC was identified from the difference between the free and total amounts of TT in the supernatant followed by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 20 min at 10 °C. The BCA assay was applied to obtain the concentration of non-entrapped TT antigen in TMC NPs and the suspension of empty TMC NPs was utilized as a blank. The loading efficiency (LE) was determined by the following equation:

LE(%0=The total amount of TT-free TT antigenThe total amount of TT×100

(2)

Additionally, the yield of TMC NPs and also TT loading content (LC) were calculated as follows:

Yield (%)=Weight of TMC nanosphersWeight of feeding polymer+TT antigen×100

(3)

LC %=The amount of TT in TMC NPsTMC NPs dry weight×100

(4)

Release assay

The nasal release of TT antigen from TMC NPs was performed using the vertical Franz diffusion cell, to simulate the humidity of the nasal cavity. The mentioned diffusion cell is comprised of two compartments with a membrane fixed between the donor and acceptor chambers. The acceptor chamber was filled with 20 ml of fresh PBS solution at pH 7.4, which stirred by a magnetic stirring bar. The nanospheres (25 mg) were poured evenly across the hydrated filter paper mounted in the diffusion cell, which was in contact with the buffer of the acceptor compartment. The release experiments were carried out at 37 °C for 4 hr. At regular time intervals, 400 µl of each sample was withdrawn from the acceptor chamber and replaced with a fresh PBS. The concentration of released TT antigen from TMC nanospheres was measured using the Micro BCA protein assay method. All experiments were conducted in triplicates.

Immunization studies

White albino rabbits weighing between 2 to 2.5 kg were supplied by Pasteur Institute (Iran) to accomplish the in vivo study. All animal experiments were performed according to the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Ethical Committee Acts, which complied with the ARRIVE guidelines and also conducted under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Rabbits were immunized in groups of four, three times at days 0, 14, and 28 (two weeks interval) via nasal administration as the following formulations: 40 Lf TT antigen solution (TT); 40 Lf TT antigen in TMC + CDM (TMC (TT) + CDM); and 40 Lf TT antigen in TMC + lactose (TMC (TT) + Lac). Additionally, intramuscular administration of the alum-adsorbed TT vaccine (Alum TT) was performed as a positive control to compare the efficacy of vaccine formulations.

Rabbits were sedated with ketamine hydrochloride) 40 mg/kg (using intramuscular injection to prevent sneezing during nasal administration. Animals were immunized with nanospheres powder (5 mg) or TT antigen solution (100 µl) by the intranasal route to assess the immune responses against the TT antigen. For the nasal delivery of dry powder formulations, powders were poured in polyethylene tubes (2.0 mm diameter) and linked to a syringe. The mentioned tubes were placed in an animal nose (0.5 cm) and 10 ml of air was injected into the tube. The inoculated animals were bled two weeks after the last booster to collect sera for antibody assays. Subsequently, rabbits were sacrificed and the nasal cavity was rinsed with PBS (5 ml, pH 7.4). All samples were kept at -70 °C until immunological assays.

Determination of antibody responses

The serum sample of each rabbit was collected to evaluate the total IgG antibody. Additionally, the nasal lavage samples from the nasal cavity of animals were used for the sIgA antibody assay. TT-specific antibody responses in the sera and nasal lavages were determined by end-point titration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously (39). Accordingly, the serum and nasal lavage samples of unimmunized rabbits were utilized as negative control. End-point dilution titers for total sIgA and IgG antibodies were detected as the highest dilution with absorbance values (OD=450 nm) equivalent to the negative control.

Statistical analysis

Immunization data were performed by one-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism (version 7.0) to assess the significance of the differences between formulations followed by the post hoc Tukey-Kramer test. The results are presented as the mean (n = 4) ± standard deviation (SD). The P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Characteristics of synthesized TMC by NMR spectroscopy

The analysis of NMR spectra revealed that a reproducible degree of quaternization was about 24%, followed by synthesizing TMC polymer using the two-step methylation procedure (data not shown).

Preparation and characteristics of TMC nanospheres

The TMC NPs were produced using ionotropic gelation of TMC polymer with the TPP solution. According to this method, the negatively charged TPP solution can interact with the positive charges of CHT (amino groups) by electrostatic interactions. The mentioned method has several advantages including the absence of heat and organic solvent during the preparation of TMC NPs. The mean intensity diameters of TMC NPs (n=5) without or with TT antigen was 378.13±50.9 nm and 447.3±58.07 nm, respectively. Additionally, the zeta potential of TMC NPs in the absence or presence of TT antigen was 3.32±0.05 mV and 2.28±0.07 (n= 5), respectively.

Determination of the protein stability

The SDS-PAGE analysis was utilized to assess the effect of the TMC preparation procedure on TT antigen integrity. As shown in Figure 1, the identical bands were detected for both TT and TT-loaded TMC NPs. This result revealed the stability of the TT structure in TMC NPs during the preparation and encapsulation process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The SDS-PAGE profile of tetanus toxoid (TT) antigen and TT-loaded trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanospheres. Lane 1: protein molecular weight marker, lane 2: blank TMC, lane 3: TMC containing TT antigen, lane 4: antigen solution

Loading efficiency of TT antigen in TMC nanospheres

The loading efficiency of TT in TMC NPs was calculated to be 43.25%±3.56 (n=5). The yield of TMC NPs and TT loading content was determined as 86%± 23.4 and 90%±27.1, respectively.

The release study of TT from TMC nanoparticles

The release assay of the TT antigen was accomplished in a diffusion chamber to mimic the humid environment of the nasal mucosa (Figure 2). The nasal release experiments of TT from TMC NPs demonstrated a burst release of 55.47%±19.83 within 30 min and reached 72.6%±27.52 in 4 hr.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The release profile of entrapped tetanus toxoid (TT) in trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanospheres. Samples were withdrawn from the acceptor chamber and replaced with phosphate-buffered saline at 30 min time intervals for 4 hr. Data points represent the mean±SD of triplicate samples

Anti-TT IgG titers

The serum IgG titers of immunized rabbits with various vaccine formulations were obtained via the end-point titration using an ELISA method (Figure 3). The titers of IgG antibody were significantly higher in inoculated rabbits with TMC (TT) + CDM, TMC (TT) + Lac, and Alum TT in comparison with the TT solution. The highest titer of IgG (P<0.05) was observed in the rabbits received Alum TT and TMC (TT) + CDM formulations through IM or nasal administration, respectively. Moreover, no significant difference (P>0.05) was determined between vaccinated animals by TMC (TT) + CDM and Alum TT vaccines.

Figure 3.

The serum anti-tetanus toxoid (TT) immunoglobulin G titers of immunized rabbits with different vaccine formulations by nasal administration. Animals were inoculated at days 0, 14, and 28 with one of the following formulations: TT solution; trimethyl chitosan (TMC) containing TT+cross-linked dextran microspheres (CDM); and TMC (TT)+Lactose (Lac). The intramuscular injection of Alum TT was administrated as a positive control. At days 42, sera were collected to identify the IgG titers by end-point titration using the ELISA technique. Results present the mean±SD (n=4)

Figure 3

*Significant difference between TT solution and test groups *(P<0.05), **(P<0.01), and ***(P<0.001)

Anti-TT sIgA titers

The sIgA titers were identified from nasal lavage of immunized rabbits using the end-point titration via an ELISA method. As shown in Figure 4, the highest sIgA titers were found in inoculated rabbits with TMC NPs formulations including TMC (TT) + Lac and TMC (TT) + CDM. The titer of sIgA antibody was significantly (P< 0.01) higher for nasal administration of TMC (TT) + Lac vaccine compared to TMC (TT) + CDM or TT solution. The lowest sIgA titer was obtained in the group received the TT solution by the nasal route.

Figure 4.

The nasal lavage anti-tetanus toxoid (TT) immunoglobulin A titers of vaccinated rabbits followed by nasal delivery of formulations. Rabbits were immunized at days 0, 14, and 28 with one of the following formulations: TT solution; trimethyl chitosan (TMC) containing TT + cross-linked dextran microspheres (CDM);+ cross-linked dextran microspheres (CDM); and TMC (TT) + Lactose (Lac). At days 42, the nasal lavages were collected to determine the sIgA titers by end-point titration using the ELISA method. Data were expressed as the mean±SD (n=4)

Figure 4

*Significant difference between TT solution and test groups *(P<0.05), **(P<0.01), and ***(P<0.001)

+Significant difference between test groups

+(P<0.05), ++(P<0.01), and +++(P<0.001)

Discussion

Dry powder forms of particulate delivery systems with muco-adhesive properties including CHT and its derivatives were developed as appropriate candidates for mucosal immunization. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the immune efficacy of synthesized TMC NPs as an antigen delivery system for nasal delivery of TT antigen in the presence of CDM or lactose excipient. The co-administration of lactose and TT-loaded TMC NPs were accomplished to promote the inhalation efficacy of the vaccine formulation. Additionally, the CDM adjuvant was physically mixed with TMC NPs loaded with TT to elevate the immunogenicity and efficiency of vaccine formulations. The dry powder formulations were delivered via the nasal route in a rabbit model to determine the titers of sIgA and IgG antibodies against the TT antigen. The dry powder form of vaccine formulations has many advantages including more microbiological and chemical stability, easier storage without cold chain, mass vaccination, and better distribution as well as more affordable compared to liquid formulations (23, 35, 36, 40, 41).

The mean size of synthesized TMC NPs without or with TT antigen was about 378 nm and 447 nm, respectively that is expected to interact efficiently with DCs. Similar to the viruses, the NP formulations with a size less than 500 nm can be quickly recognized by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) during processing and presentation of antigen followed by strongly uptake by DCs to evoke the immune response against pathogens. In contrast, the particle formulations with a size range of 0.5 to 5 µm are effectively uptaken by macrophages (42-45). Additionally, the surface charge of NPs is a crucial factor to induce potent immunity. Previous investigations illustrated that the positively charged particles enhanced the effective interaction with DCs or macrophages (42, 44, 46-48). The cationic surface of TMC polymer could elicit higher uptake of TMC particles by APCs due to the electrostatic interactions with the negative charge of cell membranes relative to anionic particles.

The nasal release study of TT-loaded TMC NPs was performed in a diffusion chamber to simulate the temperature and humid environment of the nasal cavity. Therefore, to assess the release profile of the TT antigen, the nanospheres were in contact with a wet and warm membrane similar to the nasal mucosa. Based on the release profile, the TT antigen demonstrated a burst release within 1 hr, suggesting that most of the TT was released from TMC NPs followed by a plateau release up to 4 hr. Previous studies revealed that the half-life of clearance is approximately 15 to 20 min in a nasal cavity of humans (36, 49, 50). The particulate delivery system including CHT and derivatives protects antigens from proteolytic enzymes and promotes the immunogenicity and efficacy of nasal vaccines (51, 52). Therefore, the TMC NPs as the particulate delivery system with muco-adhesive effects could increase the maintenance of vaccine formulation in the nasal mucosa.

According to the antibody assays, the incorporation of TT into TMC NPs could significantly enhance the titers of sIgA and IgG antibodies in rabbits vaccinated through the nasal route compared to the antigen alone. The sIgA antibody indicates mucosal immunity against pathogens, whereas the systemic humoral immune response is mediated by IgG antibody (53). Our results determined that the nasal administration of TMC (TT) formulation in the presence of CDM or lactose excipient could elicit robust systemic humoral and mucosal responses compared to the TT solution.

Following the intranasal delivery of TMC formulations, the higher titer of mucosal IgA antibody was observed for TMC (TT) + CDM and TMC (TT) + Lac vaccines than the TT solution. The TT-loaded TMC NPs in the presence of lactose excipient could considerably enhance the sIgA titer indicating a potent mucosal immune response. Based on our results, TMC formulations could pass through the NALT in the respiratory tract to interact with mucosal inductive tissues such as the Peyer’s patches. Subsequently, the TT-loaded NPs could be efficiently uptaken by the M-cells located in the mucosal inductive tissues to secrete the mucosal sIgA antibody and induced robust mucosal immunity (4, 7, 54, 55). The results of the sIgA test confirmed that the encapsulation of TT into TMC NPs with muco-adhesive properties could promote the maintenance of formulations in the nasal cavity to interact effectively with M-cells and other mucosal immune cells and elicited high mucosal immunity. It has been proved that antigen molecules in the particulate form are more uptaken by microfold cells relative to antigen solution (6, 34, 52, 54, 56).

Although the TMC (TT) + CDM vaccine induced the higher titer of the sIgA antibody compared to the TT solution, no significant difference was found between the mentioned formulations. Some of our previous studies illustrated that the mixture of CDM with PLGA NPs or alginate microspheres loaded with TT could enhance the titers of the sIgA antibody followed by nasal administration (35, 41). However, many investigations indicated that the co-administration of CDM with TT antigen via nasal route had no considerable effect to evoke the mucosal sIgA responses (36, 57, 58). Tabassi et al. reported that the addition of CDM to TT antigen could induce the lower mucosal sIgA titer in comparison with the TT solution, while the high mucosal immunity was stimulated by the TT solution. This study demonstrated that the lower titers of the sIgA antibody elicited with CDM + TT formulation might be due to the size of microspheres and their inability to interact with the M-cells of NALT (57). Additionally, the nasal delivery of TT-loaded CDM and also co-administration of TT with CDM in the absence or presence of the saponin adjuvant could not significantly increase nasal sIgA titers relative to the TT solution (58). According to this study, the administration of CDM with particulate delivery systems may elevate the systemic immune responses, whereas the mentioned formulation has no considerable effect on mucosal immunity. In another investigation, the mixing of CDM with TT-loaded CHT NPs demonstrated the lower mucosal sIgA titer compared to (CHT) TT + Lac vaccine. The results revealed that the encapsulated TT in CHT NPs could significantly elicit a high level of sIgA response against TT antigen (36).

Although the co-administration of CDM or lactose excipient with TMC (TT) formulation could induce robust systemic immunity against TT, the intranasal delivery of TMC (TT) + CDM formulation was more effective to elicit the high titer of IgG antibody compared to TMC (TT) + Lac vaccine. Additionally, no significant difference was found between the nasal delivery of TMC (TT) + CDM and IM injection of the Alum TT vaccine. Accordingly, the addition of CDM to TT-loaded NPs has an effective role to produce a high level of systemic IgG antibody response. The CDM has been reported as a safe absorption enhancer with adjuvant effect to improve the epithelial absorption and permeation of various antigens due to opening the intercellular tight junctions (36, 37, 57-59). Chandler et al. demonstrated that the co-administration of insulin and diethylaminoethyl-dextran (DEAE-Dextran) promoted the nasal absorption of insulin formulation in a mouse model (59). Based on our previous studies, CDM could considerably improve the mucosal and systemic immune responses (35, 41, 58). The addition of CDM as the dried hydrogel particles to co-encapsulated TT antigen and saponin adjuvant in alginate microparticles elicited the high systemic IgG titers (41). The co-administration of CDM with TT-loaded PLGA (poly [lactide-co-glycolide]) NPs illustrated the high level of IgG production relative to the PLGA (TT) + lactose or TT solution (35). The co-delivery of TT and saponin by cross-linked dextran microspheres could significantly elevate IgG titers compared to the mixing of TT with CDM or saponin (58). Moreover, the mixture of CDM with TT-loaded CHT NPs induced a high titer of IgG antibody in comparison with the TT solution (36, 58).

Taken together, the co-administration of CDM with antigen delivery systems such as TMC nanospheres can induce potent systemic immune responses, whereas CDM has no significant effect to elicit mucosal sIgA response.

Conclusion

The utilization of particulate delivery systems was developed to overcome the enzymatic degradation, rapid mucociliary clearance, and low absorption of antigens and drugs following nasal administration. The dry powder form of TT-loaded TMC NPs with or without CDM adjuvant was evaluated after intranasal immunization in a rabbit model. The encapsulated TT in TMC NPs induced high sIgA and IgG titers indicating the robust mucosal and systemic responses against TT antigen, respectively. The addition of CDM powder to TMC vaccine formulation could significantly promote the systemic IgG responses compared to TMC (TT) in the presence of lactose. Although, the TMC formulation with CDM increased the mucosal sIgA titer, no considerable difference was observed between the mentioned vaccine formulation and TT solution. According to our study, CDM excipient can be used as an efficient adjuvant to induce potent systemic responses.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences under grant [number 88164]. The results described in this paper were part of student thesis. The authors would like to thank the Clinical Research Development Unit, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for their assistance in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Chen H. Recent advances in mucosal vaccine development. J Control Release. 2000;67:117–128. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(00)00199-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lycke N. Recent progress in mucosal vaccine development: potential and limitations. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:592–605. doi: 10.1038/nri3251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mannam P, Jones KF, Geller BL. Mucosal vaccine made from live, recombinant Lactococcus lactis protects mice against pharyngeal infection with Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect Immun. 2004;72:3444–3450. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3444-3450.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pavot V, Rochereau N, Genin C, Verrier B, Paul S. New insights in mucosal vaccine development. Vaccine. 2012;30:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rhee JH, Lee SE, Kim SY. Mucosal vaccine adjuvants update. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2012;1:50–63. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2012.1.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tafaghodi M, Tabassi SAS, Jaafari MR. Induction of systemic and mucosal immune responses by intranasal administration of alginate microspheres encapsulated with tetanus toxoid and CpG-ODN. Int J Pharm. 2006;319:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ramvikas M, Arumugam M, Chakrabarti S, Jaganathan K. Nasal Vaccine Delivery. Micro and Nanotechnology in Vaccine Development: Elsevier. 2017:279–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peterson LW, Artis D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:141–153. doi: 10.1038/nri3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kiyono H, Fukuyama S. NALT-versus Peyer’s-patch-mediated mucosal immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:699–708. doi: 10.1038/nri1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Agnihotri SA, Mallikarjuna NN, Aminabhavi TM. Recent advances on chitosan-based micro-and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2004;100:5–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernández-Urrusuno R, Calvo P, Remuñán-López C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Enhancement of nasal absorption of insulin using chitosan nanoparticles. Pharm Res. 1999;16:1576–1581. doi: 10.1023/a:1018908705446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Illum L, Jabbal-Gill I, Hinchcliffe M, Fisher A, Davis S. Chitosan as a novel nasal delivery system for vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;51:81–96. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00171-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pan Y, Li Y-j, Zhao H-y, Zheng J-m, Xu H, Wei G, et al. Bioadhesive polysaccharide in protein delivery system: chitosan nanoparticles improve the intestinal absorption of insulin in vivo. Int J Pharm. 2002;249:139–147. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(02)00486-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pawar D, Jaganathan K. Mucoadhesive glycol chitosan nanoparticles for intranasal delivery of hepatitis B vaccine: enhancement of mucosal and systemic immune response. Drug Deliv. 2016;23:185–194. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.908427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prasanth Koppolu B, Smith SG, Ravindranathan S, Jayanthi S, Kumar TKS, Zaharoff DA. Controlling chitosan-based encapsulation for protein and vaccine delivery. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4382–4389. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Channarong S, Chaicumpa W, Sinchaipanid N, Mitrevej A. Development and evaluation of chitosan-coated liposomes for oral DNA vaccine: the improvement of Peyer’s patch targeting using a polyplex-loaded liposomes. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011;12:192–200. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9559-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Castro KCd, Costa JM, Campos MGN. Drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles: a review. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 2020:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matos BN, Pereira MN, Bravo MdO, Cunha-Filho M, Saldanha-Araújo F, Gratieri T, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles loading oxaliplatin as a mucoadhesive topical treatment of oral tumors: Iontophoresis further enhances drug delivery ex vivo. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;154:1265–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sayın B, Somavarapu S, Li X, Thanou M, Sesardic D, Alpar H, et al. Mono-N-carboxymethyl chitosan (MCC) and N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles for non-invasive vaccine delivery. Int J Pharm. 2008;363:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van der Lubben IM, Verhoef JC, Borchard G, Junginger HE. Chitosan and its derivatives in mucosal drug and vaccine delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14:201–207. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0987(01)00172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang H, Oh M, Allen C, Kumacheva E. Monodisperse chitosan nanoparticles for mucosal drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:2461–2468. doi: 10.1021/bm0496211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Casettari L, Illum L. Chitosan in nasal delivery systems for therapeutic drugs. J Control Release. 2014;190:189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yan Y, Sun Y, Wang P, Zhang R, Huo C, Gao T, et al. Mucoadhesive nanoparticles-based oral drug delivery systems enhance ameliorative effects of low molecular weight heparin on experimental colitis. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2020;246:116660. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsai L-C, Chen C-H, Lin C-W, Ho Y-C, Mi F-L. Development of mutlifunctional nanoparticles self-assembled from trimethyl chitosan and fucoidan for enhanced oral delivery of insulin. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;126:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amidi M, Romeijn SG, Borchard G, Junginger HE, Hennink WE, Jiskoot W. Preparation and characterization of protein-loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles as nasal delivery system. J Control Release. 2006;111:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bal SM, Slütter B, Verheul R, Bouwstra JA, Jiskoot W. Adjuvanted, antigen loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles for nasal and intradermal vaccination: adjuvant-and site-dependent immunogenicity in mice. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012;45:475–481. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hagenaars N, Mania M, de Jong P, Que I, Nieuwland R, Slütter B, et al. Role of trimethylated chitosan (TMC) in nasal residence time, local distribution and toxicity of an intranasal influenza vaccine. J Control Release. 2010;144:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Amidi M, Romeijn SG, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE, Bungener L, Huckriede A, et al. N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles loaded with influenza subunit antigen for intranasal vaccination: biological properties and immunogenicity in a mouse model. Vaccine. 2007;25:144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hagenaars N, Verheul RJ, Mooren I, de Jong PH, Mastrobattista E, Glansbeek HL, et al. Relationship between structure and adjuvanticity of N, N, N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) structural variants in a nasal influenza vaccine. J Control Release. 2009;140:126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Slütter B, Bal S, Keijzer C, Mallants R, Hagenaars N, Que I, et al. Nasal vaccination with N-trimethyl chitosan and PLGA based nanoparticles: nanoparticle characteristics determine quality and strength of the antibody response in mice against the encapsulated antigen. Vaccine. 2010;28:6282–6291. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Slütter B, Jiskoot W. Dual role of CpG as immune modulator and physical crosslinker in ovalbumin loaded N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles for nasal vaccination. J Control Release. 2010;148:117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Subbiah R, Ramalingam P, Ramasundaram S, Park K, Ramasamy MK, Choi KJ. N, N, N-Trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles for controlled intranasal delivery of HBV surface antigen. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;89:1289–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang JJ, Zeng ZW, Xiao RZ, Xie T, Zhou GL, Zhan XR, et al. Recent advances of chitosan nanoparticles as drug carriers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:765–772. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S17296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ariaee FM, Tafaghodi M. Mucosal adjuvant potential of Quillaja saponins and cross-linked dextran microspheres, co-administered with liposomes encapsulated with tetanus toxoid. Iran J Pharm Res. 2012;11:723–729. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mohaghegh M, Tafaghodi M. Dextran microspheres could enhance immune responses against PLGA nanospheres encapsulated with tetanus toxoid and Quillaja saponins after nasal immunization in rabbit. Pharm Dev Technol. 2011;16:36–43. doi: 10.3109/10837450903479962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pirouzmand H, Khameneh B, Tafaghodi M. Immunoadjuvant potential of cross-linked dextran microspheres mixed with chitosan nanospheres encapsulated with tetanus toxoid. Pharm Biol. 2017;55:212–217. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2016.1257032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sahu KK, Pandey RS. Development and characterization of HBsAg-loaded Eudragit nanoparticles for effective colonic immunization. Pharm Dev Technol. 2018:1–10. doi: 10.1080/10837450.2018.1444639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sieval A, Thanou M, Kotze A, Verhoef J, Brussee J, Junginger H. Preparation and NMR characterization of highly substitutedN-trimethyl chitosan chloride. Carbohydr Polym. 1998;36:157–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Diwan M, Tafaghodi M, Samuel J. Enhancement of immune responses by co-delivery of a CpG oligodeoxynucleotide and tetanus toxoid in biodegradable nanospheres. J Control Release. 2002;85:247–262. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00275-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Garmise RJ, Staats HF, Hickey AJ. Novel dry powder preparations of whole inactivated influenza virus for nasal vaccination. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8:2–10. doi: 10.1208/pt0804081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tafaghodi M, Rastegar S. Preparation and in vivo study of dry powder microspheres for nasal immunization. J Drug Target. 2010;18:235–242. doi: 10.3109/10611860903434035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Scheerlinck J-PY, Greenwood DL. Virus-sized vaccine delivery systems. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:882–887. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zaman M, Good MF, Toth I. Nanovaccines and their mode of action. Methods. 2013;60:226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao L, Seth A, Wibowo N, Zhao C-X, Mitter N, Yu C, et al. Nanoparticle vaccines. Vaccine. 2014;32:327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kabiri M, Sankian M, Sadri K, Tafaghodi M. Robust mucosal and systemic responses against HTLV-1 by delivery of multi-epitope vaccine in PLGA nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;133:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Foged C, Brodin B, Frokjaer S, Sundblad A. Particle size and surface charge affect particle uptake by human dendritic cells in an in vitro model. Int J Pharm. 2005;298:315–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nakanishi T, Kunisawa J, Hayashi A, Tsutsumi Y, Kubo K, Nakagawa S, et al. Positively charged liposome functions as an efficient immunoadjuvant in inducing cell-mediated immune response to soluble proteins. J Control Release. 1999;61:233–240. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Niikura K, Matsunaga T, Suzuki T, Kobayashi S, Yamaguchi H, Orba Y, et al. Gold nanoparticles as a vaccine platform: influence of size and shape on immunological responses in vitro and in vivo. ACS nano. 2013;7:3926–3938. doi: 10.1021/nn3057005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Illum L, Jørgensen H, Bisgaard H, Krogsgaard O, Rossing N. Bioadhesive microspheres as a potential nasal drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 1987;39:189–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Türker S, Onur E, Ózer Y. Nasal route and drug delivery systems. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:137–142. doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000026823.82950.ff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sajeesh S, Bouchemal K, Marsaud V, Vauthier C, Sharma CP. Cyclodextrin complexed insulin encapsulated hydrogel microparticles: An oral delivery system for insulin. J Control Release. 2010;147:377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tao Liang M, Davies NM, Blanchfield JT, Toth I. Particulate systems as adjuvants and carriers for peptide and protein antigens. Curr Drug Deliv. 2006;3:379–388. doi: 10.2174/156720106778559029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Steinhoff U, Visekruna A. Methods in Microbiology. Elsevier; 2010. Mucosal immunity and inflammation; pp. 353–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kabiri M, Sankian M, Hosseinpour M, Tafaghodi M. The novel immunogenic chimeric peptide vaccine to elicit potent cellular and mucosal immune responses against HTLV-1. Int J Pharm. 2018;549:404–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Garmise RJ, Mar K, Crowder TM, Hwang CR, Ferriter M, Huang J, et al. Formulation of a dry powder influenza vaccine for nasal delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7:131–137. doi: 10.1208/pt070103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Şenel S. Current status and future of chitosan in drug and vaccine delivery. React Funct Polym. 2019:104452. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tabassi SAS, Tafaghodi M, Jaafari MR. Induction of high antitoxin titers against tetanus toxoid in rabbits by intranasal immunization with dextran microspheres. Int J Pharm. 2008;360:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tafaghodi M, Eskandari M. The mucosal adjuvant potential of cross-linked dextran microspheres as dry powder. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15:873–881. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chandler SG, Ilium L, Thomas NW. Nasal absorption in rats Effect of enhancers on insulin absorption and nasal histology. Int J Pharm. 1991;76:61–70. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES