Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247234

Protective effects of dapagliflozin against oxidative stress-induced cell injury in human proximal tubular cells

Nawel Zaibi 1, Pengyun Li 1,¤, Shang-Zhong Xu 1,2,*
Editor: Rodrigo Franco3
PMCID: PMC7894948  PMID: 33606763

Abstract

Elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) in type 2 diabetes cause cellular damage in many organs. Recently, the new class of glucose-lowering agents, SGLT-2 inhibitors, have been shown to reduce the risk of developing diabetic complications; however, the mechanisms of such beneficial effect are largely unknown. Here we aimed to investigate the effects of dapagliflozin on cell proliferation and cell death under oxidative stress conditions and explore its underlying mechanisms. Human proximal tubular cells (HK-2) were used. Cell growth and death were monitored by cell counting, water-soluble tetrazolium-1 (WST-1) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays, and flow cytometry. The cytosolic and mitochondrial (ROS) production was measured using fluorescent probes (H2DCFDA and MitoSOX) under normal and oxidative stress conditions mimicked by addition of H2O2. Intracellular Ca2+ dynamics was monitored by FlexStation 3 using cell-permeable Ca2+ dye Fura-PE3/AM. Dapagliflozin (0.1–10 μM) had no effect on HK-2 cell proliferation under normal conditions, but an inhibitory effect was seen at an extreme high concentration (100 μM). However, dapagliflozin at 0.1 to 5 μM showed remarkable protective effects against H2O2-induced cell injury via increasing the viable cell number at phase G0/G1. The elevated cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS under oxidative stress was significantly decreased by dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin increased the basal intracellular [Ca2+]i in proximal tubular cells, but did not affect calcium release from endoplasmic reticulum and store-operated Ca2+ entry. The H2O2-sensitive TRPM2 channel seemed to be involved in the Ca2+ dynamics regulated by dapagliflozin. However, dapagliflozin had no direct effects on ORAI1, ORAI3, TRPC4 and TRPC5 channels. Our results suggest that dapagliflozin shows anti-oxidative properties by reducing cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS production and altering Ca2+ dynamics, and thus exerts its protective effects against cell damage under oxidative stress environment.

Introduction

Dapagliflozin, also named Farxiga®, is a glucose-lowering therapeutic drug in the gliflozins family [1,2]. It was developed by Bristol-Myers in partnership with AstraZeneca and approved by FDA in 2014 [3]. Dapagliflozin blocks sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) encoded by SLC5A2 gene and thus inhibits the reabsorption of filtered glucose and sodium [4,5]. Recently, clinical trials have demonstrated that the inhibition of glucose uptake by proximal tubules not only leads to lower glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in the blood but also reduces the risk of developing later life diabetic complications, such as cardiovascular events and diabetic kidney disease [2,6,7]. However, such beneficial effects and underlying mechanisms of SGLT-2 inhibitors are largely unknown.

Oxidative stress is a main factor for causing cell injury in diabetes. There are very few reports on the effect of dapagliflozin under oxidative stress conditions. In db/db mice, treatment with dapagliflozin has been shown to reduce renal expression of some enzymes related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and inflammation including NF-kB, Nox2, Nox4, TGFβ1, monocyte chemoattractant protein‑1 (MCP-1), osteopontin, intercellular adhesion molecule‑1 (ICAM-1), and myeloperoxidases (MPO) [810]. The reduction of ROS production was also observed in rat heart after a 10-week treatment with the dapagliflozin analogue empagliflozin [11]. These studies suggest that SGLT-2 inhibitors may have anti-oxidative properties. In addition, dapagliflozin decreases the amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ transient and L-type Ca2+ current in cardiac myocytes isolated from normal and diabetic rats [12], suggesting it may affect intracellular calcium dynamics.

Here we have investigated the effects of dapagliflozin on cell growth and death under normal and oxidative stress environment that mimics diabetic conditions. The effects on cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS production and intracellular [Ca2+]i, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ release, and store-operated Ca2+ influx have also been examined in the human proximal tubular cells (HK-2), since this cell type has specific expression of the drug targeted protein SGLT-2. The anti-oxidative stress effect we reported here could be an alternative mechanism for the explanation of the beneficial effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and transfection

The HK-2 cell line was purchased from LGC standards (Catalogue number CRL-2190, UK). HK-2 cells were maintained in DMEM/F-12 medium with 5 mM glucose and supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS), 10 mM HEPES and 100 units∙mL-1 penicillin and 100 μg∙mL-1 streptomycin. The function of reabsorption for the HK-2 cell line was characterized in our previous report [13]. The inducible TRPM2 cells were generated by transfection of human TRPM2 gene (GenBank accession number BC112342) in pcDNA4/TO tetracycline-regulatory vector into HEK-293 T-REx cells (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). The TRPM2 cells were cultured and maintained using standard DMEM/F-12 medium. The expression of TRPM2 was induced by tetracycline (1 μg∙mL-1) and the function was characterized as we described previously [14]. All the cell cultures were maintained at 37°C under 95% air and 5% CO2 without mycoplasma contamination.

Cell apoptosis, necrosis and proliferation assays

Apoptosis was measured by direct cell counting after Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide nuclear staining. HK-2 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 100 mM phosphate buffer solution (22.6 mM NaH2PO4 and 77.4 mM Na2HPO4), washed out with PBS, and incubated with Hoechst 33342 (1 μM) and propidium iodide (15 μM) for 30 min in the dark. The cells were washed with PBS twice and the nuclear staining was photographed using a fluorescent microscopy. The apoptotic cells with condensed nuclear staining were counted using CellC software. For necrotic cell death, the activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the culture medium that released from the cytosol was determined using a Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (Roche) with similar procedures in our previous report [15]. Cell proliferation was determined using a water-soluble tetrazolium-1 (WST-1) assay in which tetrazolium salts are cleaved by mitochondrial dehydrogenase to form formazan in viable cells [16]. The absorbance for WST-1 and LDH assays was measured using a spectrophotometer.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

The HK-2 cells were seeded into a 6-cm petri dish at a confluence of 5000 cells/mL and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C for 24 hours. The cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of dapagliflozin for 2 hours before addition of 200 μM H2O2, followed by a 24-hour incubation with dapagliflozin or/and H2O2. The cells were trypsinised with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and centrifuged twice with PBS in FACS tubes at 300 g for 5 minutes. The PBS was then removed and 200 μL of 10 μg/mL propidium iodide was added to all the tubes and incubated for 15 minutes before mounting for FACS detection. The cell cycle was analysed using CellQuest software and all groups were set in triplicates.

Cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS assays

The cytosolic ROS fluorescent indicator H2DCFDA was used to monitor ROS production. Briefly, HK-2 cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at a confluence of 6 ×104 cells per well and incubated for 24 hours. The cells were washed twice with warm PBS and loaded with H2DCFDA dye at a final concentration of 2 μM in standard bath solution. The standard bath solution contained (mM): 130 NaCl, 5 KCl, 8 D-glucose, 10 HEPES, 1.2 MgCl2, and 1.5 CaCl2, and the pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. After incubation for 45 minutes at 37°C in the dye, cells were washed with standard bath solution and dapagliflozin at different concentrations was added into the wells to a final volume of 200 μL. The plate was then placed in FlexStation 3 (Molecular Device, USA) and the fluorescence intensity was read at excitation/emission wavelength of 492/520 nm using a kinetics protocol. The protocol was set to automatically add 10 μL of 2 mM H2O2 solution at a time point of 300 seconds to give a final concentration of 200 μM H2O2.

For mitochondrial ROS assay, the mitochondrial ROS indicator, MitoSOX, was loaded at a concentration of 5 μM in PBS. MitoSOX red is a cationic derivative of dihydroethidium which enters live cells and specifically intercalates with mitochondrial DNA and results in red fluorescence. The successful loading of MitoSOX was examined using a fluorescent microscopy and the cells were then washed twice with standard bath solution. Dapagliflozin at different concentrations was added to the cells for 3–5 min prior to the experiment. The plate was then placed in FlexStation 3 and fluorescence was measured at excitation/emission wavelength of 510/580 nm.

[Ca2+]i measurement

Cells were pre-incubated with 2 μM Fura-PE3/AM at 37°C for 30 min in Ca2+-free bath solution (mM):130 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 8 D-glucose, and 0.4 EGTA, followed by a 20-min wash period in the standard bath solution at room temperature. The ratio of Ca2+ dye fluorescence (F340/F380) was measured using FlexStation 3. Thapsigargin (TG, 1μM) was used to block SERCA in the ER to cause ER Ca2+ release signal in Ca2+-free bath solution. The store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) was measured by addition of 1.5 mM Ca2+ after the ER Ca2+ store depletion by TG.

Electrophysiology

The whole-cell patch clamp procedure is similar to our previous report [17]. Briefly, electrical signal was amplified with an Axopatch 200B patch clamp amplifier and controlled with pClamp software 10. A 1-s ramp voltage protocol from –100 mV to +100 mV was applied at a frequency of 0.2 Hz from a holding potential of 0 mV. Signals were sampled at 1 kHz. The glass microelectrode with a resistance of 3–5 MΩ was used. The pipette solution contained (in mM): 115 CsCl, 10 EGTA, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES and 5.7 CaCl2, pH was adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH and osmolarity was adjusted to ∼290 mOsm with mannitol, and the calculated free Ca2+ was 200 nM. ADP-ribose (0.5 mM) was added in the pipette solution to activate TRPM2. The cells were perfused with standard bath solution during whole-cell patch recording. The experiment was performed at room temperature (25°C).

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the HK-2 cells using TRI reagent (Sigma). The RNA was reverse transcribed with moloney murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase (RT) using random primers and oligo dT primers (Promega). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, UK). The primer set was designed across introns to avoid genomic DNA contamination and synthesized by Sigma-Genosys. The primer sequences were: SGLT-1 (ACCTTTCCCTTCTGTCCCTG and CATGATCACCGTCTGCAAGG); SGLT-2-primer set 1 (GACATGTTCTCCGGAGCTGT and GCTCCCAGGTATTTGTCGAA); SGLT-2-primer set 2 (TCACGATGCCACAGTACC and TAGATGTTCCAGCCCAGAGC); β-actin (ACAGAGCCTCGCCTTTGC and GGAATCCTTCTGACCCATGC). Each reaction volume was 10 μl, which contained 1 × SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), 5 μl of cDNA, 0.75 μl of 300 nM forward primer, and 0.75 μl of 300 nM reverse primer. Human β-actin was used as an internal standard for control. The PCR cycle was programmed as an initial cycle of 50 °C for 2 min, followed by 95 °C for 10 min, then 50 repeated cycles of 95 °C for 15 s denaturation and 54 °C annealing temperature for 30 s, and primer extension at 72 °C for 30 s. The PCR products were examined by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels.

Chemicals and reagents

All general salts and reagents were from Sigma (UK). Dapagliflozin, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB), tetracycline, thapsigargin, propidium iodide, Hoechst 33342 and FCCP (carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. MitoSOX and H2DCFDA were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific UK. Fura-PE3/AM was purchased from Invitrogen (UK). Dapagliflozin (100 mM), Fura-PE3/AM (1 mM), thapsigargin (1 mM) and 2-APB (100 mM) were made up as stock solutions in 100% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO).

Statistics

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Where n is the number of wells for FlexStation experiments or cell number for electrophysiological recordings. Mean data were compared using paired t test for the results before and after treatment, or unpaired t test for two group comparison. ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc analysis was used for comparing more than two groups with significance indicated if P<0.05.

Results

Expression of SGLT isoforms in HK-2 cells

HK-2 cell line is an immortalized proximal tubule epithelial cell line derived from normal adult human kidney [13,18]. To confirm the phenotype of human proximal tubular cell line, the expression of sodium glucose co-transporter-1 (SGLT-1) and -2 (SGLT-2) was examined using RT-PCR. Two primer sets across introns were used for SGLT-2 and β-actin was set as a positive control, the bands for SGLT-2 were much stronger than that for SGLT-1 and β-actin (Fig 1), suggesting that SGLT-2 is highly expressed in the proximal tubular cell line, which also confirms the specific cell marker for the proximal tubular cells used in the study.

Fig 1. The mRNAs of SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 were detected in HK-2 cells by RT-PCR.

Fig 1

The β-actin was set as positive control. Two primer sets (P1 and P2) were used for SGLT-2. The product size for β-actin, SGLT-1, SGLT-2 (P1) and SGLT-2 (P2) is 203 bp, 211 bp, 236 bp, and 159 bp, respectively. 2% agarose gel was used (Also see full length gel in S1 Fig).

Oxidative stress-induced cell injury

Cell growth and death were examined under oxidative stress conditions mimicked by addition of H2O2. Cell proliferation was monitored by WST-1 assay, which is proportional to the number of viable cells. HK-2 cells were incubated with different concentrations of H2O2 for 24 hours and the cell proliferation was significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 2A). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated according to the normalised dose response curve with an IC50 of 115 μM and a slope factor of 1.74 (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Cell proliferation and death under H2O2-induced oxidative stress conditions.

Fig 2

The proliferation of HK-2 cells was assayed with WST-1 reagents after a 24-hour incubation with different concentrations of H2O2. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm with a reference wavelength of 650 nm. A, Mean ± SEM data (n = 8 for each group). B, The normalised dose-response data was fitted with the equation: y = A2 + (A1-A2)/(1 + (x/x0)^p), and the IC50 was 114.9 μM. C, The cytotoxicity of HK-2 cells was assayed using LDH reagents after a 24-hour incubation with H2O2, and the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm and a reference wavelength of 680 nm. D, The dose–response curve showed an IC50 of 199.4 μM for cytotoxicity (n = 8 for each group, ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used for group comparison). E, Examples of Hoechst 33342 (Hoechst) and propidium iodide (PI) nuclear staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. F, Mean ± SEM data for apoptotic cell counting (n = 6 for each group). *** P<0.001.

The effect of H2O2 on HK-2 cell death was determined by LDH assay after incubation with different concentrations of H2O2 ranging from 0 to 4000 μM for 24 hours (Fig 2C). The LDH activity in the medium increased in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 was 199 μM with a slope factor (p) of 0.007 (Fig 2D), suggesting that H2O2 significantly induced cell death.

To further investigate H2O2-induced cell death, we examined the apoptotic cell death using nuclear staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33342. After 24 hours incubation with 200 μM H2O2, the apoptotic cell number was counted after taking pictures using a fluorescent microscopy. The HK-2 cells treated with H2O2 showed a significant increase of apoptotic cell death (Fig 2C and 2D). These results suggest that H2O2 is a useful agent to induce human proximal tubular cell injury to mimic oxidative stress condition.

Effects of dapagliflozin on cell proliferation and death under normal and oxidative stress conditions

To investigate the effects of dapagliflozin on HK-2 cell proliferation under normal and oxidative stress conditions, cells were treated with different concentrations of dapagliflozin for 24-hour with or without incubation with 200 μM H2O2. H2O2 at 200 μM was used because this concentration near the IC50 can mimic oxidative stress to cause cell growth inhibition and cell death. Under normal cell culture condition, dapagliflozin itself did not affect cell proliferation except the highest concentration (100 μM) that showed a significant decrease in cell proliferation, suggesting a potential cytotoxic effect at the very high concentration. However, dapagliflozin at concentrations between 0.1 and 10 μM showed a significant increase in proliferation under the oxidative stress condition by adding 200 μM H2O2. Dapagliflozin at 0.1 μM showed the maximum protective effect against the H2O2-induced inhibition of cell proliferation.

The effect of dapagliflozin on cell death was also examined. In normal condition, dapagliflozin at 0.1, 1 and 5 μM did not show any significant effects on LDH release from the HK-2 cells, but higher concentrations (10 and 100 μM) showed a significant increase compared to the control (Fig 3B), suggesting that the drug at high concentrations can cause cell injury, which should be alerted in clinic practice. In the cells treated with H2O2, dapagliflozin at 0.1, 1, and 5 μM showed a significant reduction in LDH release compared to the control. The greatest protection occurred at the concentration of 0.1 μM (Fig 3B). These results suggested that dapagliflozin is a potent agent in the protection of oxidative stress-induced cell death in proximal tubular cells. Similar to cell proliferation, too high concentration of dapagliflozin (100 μM) did not show any protection but damage the cells.

Fig 3. Effects of dapagliflozin on cell growth and death under normal and H2O2-induced oxidative stress conditions.

Fig 3

A, Effect on cell proliferation under normal and oxidative stress conditions mimicked with 200 μM H2O2. Cell proliferation was assayed with WST-1 reagents after incubation with dapagliflozin for 24 hours. The absorbance was measured (n = 8 for each group). B, Cytotoxicity was assayed with LDH reagents after incubation with dapagliflozin for 24 hours, with or without 200 μM H2O2 (n = 8 for each group). The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm and a reference wavelength of 680 nm. In A and B, *** P<0.001 is for the comparison with control, and ## P<0.01 and ### P<0.001 for the comparison with H2O2 control group without dapagliflozin. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used for group comparisons. C, Examples of nuclear staining with propidium iodide (PI) and Hoechst 33342 (Hoechst). Scale bar = 100 μm. D, Mean ± SEM data for the percentage of apoptotic cells in the group of H2O2 (200 μM) and H2O2 (200 μM) plus dapagliflozin (0.1 μM). (n = 6 for each group, *** P<0.001 by unpaired t-test).

The apoptotic cells were counted using nuclear staining methods with propidium iodide and Hoechst 33342. Dapagliflozin at 0.1 μM significantly reduced the percentage of apoptotic cell death (Fig 3C and 3D), which further supports the protective effects of dapagliflozin against H2O2-induced cell death.

Cell cycle response to H2O2 and the effect of dapagliflozin

The effects of dapagliflozin on H2O2-induced cell cycle arrest have been examined. The HK-2 cells treated with different concentrations of dapagliflozin with or without H2O2 and the effect on cell cycle was analysed by FACS after staining with propidium iodide (Fig 4A). Cells treated with 200 μM H2O2 showed a significant increase of cells arrested in the G2/M phase (~ 33%) and in the S phase (6%) compared to the non-treated control, suggesting that the cell cycle of HK-2 cells is arrested by the oxidative stress condition. In the group without H2O2 treatment, dapagliflozin did not significantly alter the cell cycle except the high concentration group (10 μM) with an increased percentage of cells in S phase, reflecting an active repair response (Fig 4B). In cells treated with both dapagliflozin and 200 μM H2O2, dapagliflozin at 0.01 and 0.1 μM significantly increased the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase and decreased the percentage of cells in G2/M phase. Dapagliflozin at 0.1 μM also reduced the percentage of cells in the S phase (Fig 4B). These results suggest that the alteration of cell cycle by oxidative stress can be prevented by dapagliflozin.

Fig 4. Cell cycle response to oxidative stress and the effect of dapagliflozin.

Fig 4

A, Human proximal tubular cells (HK-2) were cultured in 6-cm petri dishes and the oxidative stress was induced with 200 μM H2O2 for 24 hours. The histogram examples of the cells stained with propidium iodide with or without 0.1 μM dapagliflozin (Dapa). B, Cell cycle was quantified by FACS and mean ± SEM data were presented (n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used for group comparison. ** P<0.01 and *** P<0.001 for G0/G1 phase comparison; ΔΔΔ P<0.001 for S phase comparison; and ## P<0.01 and ### P<0.001 for G2/M phase comparison.

Dapagliflozin prevents H2O2-induced cytosolic ROS production

The cytosolic ROS production was real-time monitored using FlexStation 3 in normal and oxidative stress conditions using fluorescent ROS indicator H2DCFDA. After adding 200 μM H2O2 to the cells, the fluorescence intensity gradually increased and the slope was much bigger than the control group without H2O2 (Fig 5A and 5B), suggesting that the ROS production is higher in the oxidative stress condition. This result is consistent with the previous report [19], suggesting that H2O2 stimulates cytosolic ROS production.

Fig 5. Cytosolic ROS production under oxidative stress and the protection by dapagliflozin.

Fig 5

HK-2 cells were loaded with cytosolic ROS indicator, H2DCFDA (2 μM) and the fluorescence intensity was dynamically monitored using FlexStation at an excitation wavelength of 492 nm and an emission wavelength of 520 nm. Reads were sampled every 60 seconds. A. The time course of fluorescence intensity in control and H2O2-treated groups. B, Change of cytosolic ROS fluorescence in 60 min for the control (without H2O2) and H2O2 groups (n = 5, *** P<0.001). C, Effects of dapagliflozin (Dapa) on cytosolic ROS production under normal conditions. D, Mean ± SEM data for the change of fluorescence in HK-2 cells within 60 min. E, Time course of cytosolic ROS indicator fluorescence for the cells treated with H2O2 (200 μM) and different concentrations of dapagliflozin. F, Mean ± SEM data for the delta fluorescence changes in 60 min (n = 5 for each concentration). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used. ** P<0.01.

To investigate the effects of dapagliflozin on ROS production, HK-2 cells were incubated with different concentrations of dapagliflozin. The fluorescence was gradually increased as the incubation time increasing, however there was no statistical difference compared to the control (Fig 5C and 5D), suggesting that dapagliflozin (0.1–10 μM) did not affect cytosolic ROS production in normal condition. However, under oxidative stress conditions, dapagliflozin at 0.1 μM showed a significant reduction of ROS production compared to the H2O2 control, reflecting its antioxidative properties. Nevertheless, dapagliflozin at 1 and 10 μM did not reduce ROS (Fig 5E and 5F), suggesting the beneficial effect of dapagliflozin is associated with the concentrations used.

Mitochondrial ROS production reduced by dapagliflozin

To observe the effects on mitochondrial ROS, MitoSOX was used as mitochondrial superoxide indicator. Cells were incubated with MitoSOX (5 μM) for 30 min and the red fluorescence in mitochondria was evident (Fig 6A). The intensity of MitoSOX was significantly increased after incubation with a mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation uncoupler FCCP (Fig 6B), suggesting that MitoSOX is specific for mitochondrial ROS detection. H2O2 at 200 μM also significantly increased mitochondrial ROS production (Fig 6C and 6D). These data suggest that mitochondrial ROS production was enhanced in the cells under oxidative stress conditions.

Fig 6. Mitochondrial ROS detected by MitoSOX and the effect of dapagliflozin.

Fig 6

A. HK-2 cells loaded with mitochondrial ROS indicator MitoSOX (5 μM) and measured by FlexStation 3 at the excitation wavelength of 510 nm and emission wavelength of 580 nm and the kinetics was sampled every 60 sec. The time course for the cells treated with FCCP (50 μM) or without FCCP (control). Example of MitoSOX (Red) loading was shown in the inset. B. Mean data for MitoSOX intensity change at the time point of 60 min in both control and FCCP groups (n = 8 for each group, *** P<0.001). C, Time course for MitoSOX fluorescence in the cells treated with or without (control) 200 μM H2O2. D, Mean ± SEM data (n = 7 for each group, *** P<0.001 assessed by unpaired t-test). E, Effect of dapagliflozin (Dapa) on the intensity of mitochondrial ROS fluorescence in HK-2 cells under normal conditions. F, Mean ± SEM data (n = 7 for each group). G, Effect of dapagliflozin under H2O2-induced oxidative stress conditions. H, Mean ± SEM data for the delta changes of mitochondrial MitoSOX intensity within 60 min treatment (n = 7 for each group). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used, ** P<0.01.

The effects of dapagliflozin on mitochondrial ROS were examined in normal and oxidative stress conditions. MitoSOX fluorescence intensity was not changed significantly compared to the control, suggesting that dapagliflozin did not affect mitochondrial ROS production in normal condition. Under oxidative stress condition dapagliflozin at 0.1 μM significantly decreased the ROS production in the mitochondria (Fig 6G and 6H), suggesting its preventive effect on mitochondrial ROS production. However, higher concentrations (1, 10 μM) of dapagliflozin did not show any protection.

Intracellular calcium dynamics modulated by dapagliflozin

The interplay of ROS and intracellular [Ca2+]i is an important cellular process for regulating mitochondrial function, gene expression and apoptosis [20], therefore the [Ca2+]i was measured by FlexStation 3 using the Ca2+ dye Fura-PE3/AM. The HK-2 cells were treated with different concentrations of dapagliflozin and the basal Ca2+ fluorescence was determined under normal bath solution. Dapagliflozin at concentrations ranging from 0.01 μM to 10 μM increased basal intracellular calcium level (Fig 7A). To explore the underlying mechanisms, the ER calcium release and SOCE were examined, and dapagliflozin had no significant effects on TG-induced Ca2+ release and SOCE (Fig 7B and 7C). We also examined the effect on H2O2-sensitive cation channel TRPM2. Interestingly, pre-incubation with dapagliflozin significantly enhanced the Ca2+ influx in the Tet-induced TRPM2 cells with a unique second phase of activation, but no such phenomena in the non-induced control cells (Fig 7D). This delayed activation could be due to an indirect effect, since dapagliflozin had no direct effect on the channel per se using whole-cell patch clamp recording with intracellular ADP-ribose activator (Fig 7F). Dapagliflozin had no effects on TRPC4, TRPC5, ORAI1 and ORAI3 (Fig 8), and those channels are also expressed in the human proximal tubular cells [13,2124] and have redox-sensitivity [2527].

Fig 7. Effect of dapagliflozin on basal [Ca2+]i and Ca2+ influx in HK-2-cells.

Fig 7

HK-2 cells were seeded at a confluence of 6×104 cells/well and incubated for 12 hours before loading with Fura-PE3/AM (1 μM). The ratio (F340/F380) was measured using FlexStation 3. A, Mean ± SEM data for the basal Ca2+ level (n = 7 for each group). B, Effect on thapsigargin (TG, 1 μM) induced Ca2+ release and store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) after refilling with 1.5 mM Ca2+. C, Mean ± SEM data for (B) (n = 7). D, HEK293 T-REx cells over-expressing with human TRPM2 and the activation by 1 mM H2O2 (n = 8). E, Dapagliflozin (Dapa) altered intracellular Ca2+ dynamics related to the TRPM2 channels. F, No direct effect on TRPM2 channel activated by ADP-ribose (0.5 mM). G, Mean ± SEM data for (F) (n = 4).

Fig 8. No effect of dapagliflozin on ORAI1, ORAI3, TRPC4 and TRPC5 currents.

Fig 8

Whole-cell patch recording was performed using HEK293 T-REx cells overexpressing ORAI or TRPC channels. The detail procedures are similar to our previous reports [13,2729]. A, Example of ORAI1 current recorded in the HEK293 T-REx cells expressing ORAI1-mCherry. The current was induced by thapsigargin (1 μM) in the pipette solution. Dapagliflozin (Dapa) showed no obvious effect on the current, but diethylstilbestrol (DES) as a positive control blocker significantly inhibited the ORAI1 current. B, Example of ORAI3 current induced by 2-APB (100 μM) and the effect of Dapa (1, 10 μM). C, Example of TRPC4 current in the presence of activator Gd3+ (20 μM) and the effect of Dapa (10 μM). 2-APB (100 μM) was added as a positive control (inhibitor). D, TRPC5 was induced by Gd3+ (20 μM) and the effect of ML204 (10 μM) and Dapa (10 μM). The IV curves were shown as insets in each panel. N = 3–5 for each channel current recorded by whole-cell patch.

Discussion

Our results show that dapagliflozin displays a significant protective effect against oxidative stress-induced cell injury in HK-2 cells. The elevated cytosolic ROS and mitochondrial ROS production under oxidative stress conditions is reduced by pre-treatment with dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also increases basal intracellular Ca2+ level and interferences with intracellular Ca2+ dynamics, which might be mediated by an indirect effect via the H2O2-sensentive TRPM2 channels. Dapagliflozin has no effects on ER calcium release, SOCE, ORAI channels, TRPC4, and TRPC5 channels. These findings give a new insight into the pharmacology of SGLT-2 inhibitors.

Hydrogen peroxide has been used in vitro cell models to mimic oxidative stress conditions. The concentration at 100–500 μM has been used in different cell types to induce apoptotic cell death, necrosis and the inhibition of cell proliferation [15,30]. We have examined the dose response of H2O2 in the HK-2 cells and found that the concentration near IC50 (200 μM) can successfully mimic oxidative stress condition. Dapagliflozin at 0.1 to 5 μM shows a significant protective effect against oxidative stress-induced cell injury. Both H2O2-induced apoptosis and cell growth inhibition are alleviated by dapagliflozin. However high concentrations of dapagliflozin (more than 10 μM) may cause cytotoxicity. Based on human pharmacokinetics data, the maximum therapeutic plasma concentration of dapagliflozin (Cmax) is 158 ng/ml (~0.39 μM) [3] and the extreme high Cmax is 1000 ng/ml (~2.44 μM) [31], therefore the protective effect of dapagliflozin at 0.1 to 1 μM should be considered as a therapeutic effect.

The real-time monitoring of fluorescence intensity of specific ROS indicators allows us to accurately detect cytosolic ROS or mitochondria ROS production. The control group and test groups were run in parallel in same plate, which produces more reliable data for comparison. We found that the cytosolic ROS is enhanced under oxidative stress and dapagliflozin at 0.1 μM reduced the enhanced ROS production. This finding is consistent with the in vivo study in Akita mice kidney and the in vitro study using cultured murine proximal tubular epithelial cells under high glucose condition [10,32]. We have also examined the mitochondrial ROS production using MitoSOX™ red. MitoSOX is cell permeable and rapidly oxidized by superoxide but not by other ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). In order to confirm the dye specificity, the mitochondrial chain uncoupler FCCP was used as a positive control in this study, which has been reported to increase MitoSOX fluorescence intensity [33]. Our data show that the prevention of ROS production by dapagliflozin (0.1 μM) is seen in the oxidative stress condition, but not in the normal condition. Too high concentrations (≥ 10 μM) of dapagliflozin have no protective effects rather than cytotoxicity. It is unclear how dapagliflozin alters the mitochondrial activity. Dapagliflozin may influence on Bcl2 or Bax expression [34]. Dapagliflozin may also cause a modest inhibition of mitochondrial complex I and activate AMPK [35]. The anti-oxidant capacity of gliflozin family has been examined using an oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay, dapagliflozin itself has less anti-oxidant capacity by its chemical structure comparing with remogliflozin and canagliflozin [36], but strong antioxidant effect was seen in cells, suggesting the effect is due to a biological process.

Oxidative stress and high glucose in diabetes are closely related to intracellular Ca2+ dynamics, calcium channels and apoptotic protein regulators [13,3739]. Therefore, we have examined the Ca2+ release, Ca2+ influx and some Ca2+ channels. Dapagliflozin slightly increases the basal Ca2+ level in HK-2 cells, but does not change Ca2+ release and store-operated Ca2+ influx. However, the Ca2+ influx via TRPM2 seems to be facilitated by dapagliflozin when H2O2 is applied, which could be due to the dynamic change of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and then affect TRPM2 channel sensitivity to [Ca2+]i [38]. Nevertheless, the channel itself did not show any direct response to dapagliflozin in the patch clamp experiments, where the intracellular Ca2+ level was clamped with the buffered pipette solution. Dapagliflozin may have a differential effect from other SGLT-2 inhibitors, since empagliflozin and canagliflozin can cause coronary vasodilation, but dapagliflozin cannot [40]. In addition, the inhibition of Na+-H+ exchanger (NHX) by SGLT-2 inhibitors may also affect the mitochondrial and cytosol Ca2+ homeostasis [12,41,42]. SGLT-2 is almost exclusively expressed in the kidney proximal tubules although it has also been reported in other organs, such as pancreatic alpha cells [43], therefore it could be difficult to extend the concept from the cell types with low SGLT-2 and high L-type Ca2+ channels expression, such as cardiac myocytes, to the HK-2 cells with high SGLT-2 expression and no L-type Ca2+ channels, since dapagliflozin inhibits L-type channel expression in the heart [44].

In conclusion, dapagliflozin displays a significant protective effect against oxidative stress induced proximal tubular cell injury. This protective effect is mediated by the reduction of cytosolic ROS and mitochondrial superoxide ROS production. Dapagliflozin also alters the dynamics of Ca2+ influx via the oxidative-sensitive TRPM2 Ca2+ channels. The antioxidative effect could be a new alternative explanation for the beneficial effects of dapagliflozin.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The full PCR gel and the cropped area presented in Fig 1.

(PPTX)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA with JDRF (to S.Z.X.). P.L. received the scholarship from China Scholarship Council as a visiting scholar to Hull York Medical School.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. We have given the procedures, part of raw data, analysis and graphs on the protocol hub: https://www.protocols.io/view/protocol-for-intracellular-ca2-detection-using-fle-bnubmesn.

Funding Statement

This project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 115974. Funder has no role in the study design and data collection and manuscript preparation.

References

  • 1.Heerspink HJ, Perkins BA, Fitchett DH, Husain M, Cherney DZ. Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Cardiovascular and Kidney Effects, Potential Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Circulation. 2016;134(10):752–72. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021887 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Home P. Cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering medications: an update. Diabetologia. 2019;62(3):357–69. 10.1007/s00125-018-4801-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Plosker GL. Dapagliflozin: a review of its use in patients with type 2 diabetes. Drugs. 2014;74(18):2191–209. 10.1007/s40265-014-0324-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rieg T, Vallon V. Development of SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitors. Diabetologia. 2018;61(10):2079–86. 10.1007/s00125-018-4654-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghezzi C, Loo DDF, Wright EM. Physiology of renal glucose handling via SGLT1, SGLT2 and GLUT2. Diabetologia. 2018;61(10):2087–97. 10.1007/s00125-018-4656-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scheen AJ. Cardiovascular Effects of New Oral Glucose-Lowering Agents: DPP-4 and SGLT-2 Inhibitors. Circ Res. 2018;122(10):1439–59. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Birkeland KI, Jorgensen ME, Carstensen B, Persson F, Gulseth HL, Thuresson M, et al. Cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes following initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus other glucose-lowering drugs (CVD-REAL Nordic): a multinational observational analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(9):709–17. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30258-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang L, Wu Y, Tian M, Sjostrom CD, Johansson U, Peng XR, et al. Dapagliflozin slows the progression of the renal and liver fibrosis associated with type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2017;313(5):E563–E76. 10.1152/ajpendo.00086.2017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Terami N, Ogawa D, Tachibana H, Hatanaka T, Wada J, Nakatsuka A, et al. Long-term treatment with the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, ameliorates glucose homeostasis and diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100777 10.1371/journal.pone.0100777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yao D, Wang S, Wang M, Lu W. Renoprotection of dapagliflozin in human renal proximal tubular cells via the inhibition of the high mobility group box 1receptor for advanced glycation end productsnuclear factorkappaB signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(4):3625–30. 10.3892/mmr.2018.9393 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kusaka H, Koibuchi N, Hasegawa Y, Ogawa H, Kim-Mitsuyama S. Empagliflozin lessened cardiac injury and reduced visceral adipocyte hypertrophy in prediabetic rats with metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(1):157 10.1186/s12933-016-0473-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hamouda NN, Sydorenko V, Qureshi MA, Alkaabi JM, Oz M, Howarth FC. Dapagliflozin reduces the amplitude of shortening and Ca(2+) transient in ventricular myocytes from streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;400(1–2):57–68. 10.1007/s11010-014-2262-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zeng B, Chen GL, Garcia-Vaz E, Bhandari S, Daskoulidou N, Berglund LM, et al. ORAI channels are critical for receptor-mediated endocytosis of albumin. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1920 10.1038/s41467-017-02094-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen GL, Zeng B, Eastmond S, Elsenussi SE, Boa AN, Xu SZ. Pharmacological comparison of novel synthetic fenamate analogues with econazole and 2-APB on the inhibition of TRPM2 channels. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(6):1232–43. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02058.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu SZ, Zhong W, Watson NM, Dickerson E, Wake JD, Lindow SW, et al. Fluvastatin reduces oxidative damage in human vascular endothelial cells by upregulating Bcl-2. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(4):692–700. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02913.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu SZ, Zhong W, Ghavideldarestani M, Saurabh R, Lindow SW, Atkin SL. Multiple mechanisms of soy isoflavones against oxidative stress-induced endothelium injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47(2):167–75. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.04.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zeng B, Chen GL, Daskoulidou N, Xu SZ. The ryanodine receptor agonist 4-chloro-3-ethylphenol blocks ORAI store-operated channels. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(5):1250–9. 10.1111/bph.12528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ryan MJ, Johnson G, Kirk J, Fuerstenberg SM, Zager RA, Torok-Storb B. HK-2: an immortalized proximal tubule epithelial cell line from normal adult human kidney. Kidney Int. 1994;45(1):48–57. 10.1038/ki.1994.6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chernyak BV, Izyumov DS, Lyamzaev KG, Pashkovskaya AA, Pletjushkina OY, Antonenko YN, et al. Production of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria of HeLa cells under oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757(5–6):525–34. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.02.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gorlach A, Bertram K, Hudecova S, Krizanova O. Calcium and ROS: A mutual interplay. Redox Biol. 2015;6:260–71. Epub 2015/08/22. 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shen B, He Y, Zhou S, Zhao H, Mei M, Wu X. TRPC6 May Protect Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Through Inhibiting Necroptosis of Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:633–41. 10.12659/msm.897353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Riccio A, Medhurst AD, Mattei C, Kelsell RE, Calver AR, Randall AD, et al. mRNA distribution analysis of human TRPC family in CNS and peripheral tissues. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2002;109(1–2):95–104. 10.1016/s0169-328x(02)00527-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goel M, Sinkins WG, Zuo CD, Estacion M, Schilling WP. Identification and localization of TRPC channels in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(5):F1241–52. 10.1152/ajprenal.00376.2005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Turvey MR, Wang Y, Gu Y. The effects of extracellular nucleotides on [Ca2+]i signalling in a human-derived renal proximal tubular cell line (HKC-8). J Cell Biochem. 2010;109(1):132–9. 10.1002/jcb.22390 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xu SZ, Zeng B, Daskoulidou N, Chen GL, Atkin SL, Lukhele B. Activation of TRPC cationic channels by mercurial compounds confers the cytotoxicity of mercury exposure. Toxicol Sci. 2012;125(1):56–68. Epub 2011/10/11. 10.1093/toxsci/kfr268 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grupe M, Myers G, Penner R, Fleig A. Activation of store-operated I(CRAC) by hydrogen peroxide. Cell Calcium. 2010;48(1):1–9. Epub 2010/07/22. 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu SZ, Sukumar P, Zeng F, Li J, Jairaman A, English A, et al. TRPC channel activation by extracellular thioredoxin. Nature. 2008;451(7174):69–72. Epub 2008/01/04. 10.1038/nature06414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li P, Rubaiy HN, Chen GL, Hallett T, Zaibi N, Zeng B, et al. Mibefradil, a T-type Ca(2+) channel blocker also blocks Orai channels by action at the extracellular surface. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(19):3845–56. Epub 2019/07/05. 10.1111/bph.14788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jiang H, Zeng B, Chen GL, Bot D, Eastmond S, Elsenussi SE, et al. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and new fenamate analogues on TRPC4 and TRPC5 channels. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83(7):923–31. Epub 2012/01/31. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.01.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cai H. Hydrogen peroxide regulation of endothelial function: origins, mechanisms, and consequences. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;68(1):26–36. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.06.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khomitskaya Y, Tikhonova N, Gudkov K, Erofeeva S, Holmes V, Dayton B, et al. Bioequivalence of Dapagliflozin/Metformin Extended-release Fixed-combination Drug Product and Single-component Dapagliflozin and Metformin Extended-release Tablets in Healthy Russian Subjects. Clin Ther. 2018;40(4):550–61 e3. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.02.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hatanaka T, Ogawa D, Tachibana H, Eguchi J, Inoue T, Yamada H, et al. Inhibition of SGLT2 alleviates diabetic nephropathy by suppressing high glucose-induced oxidative stress in type 1 diabetic mice. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016;4(4):e00239 10.1002/prp2.239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hanninen SL, Ronkainen JJ, Leskinen H, Tavi P. Mitochondrial uncoupling downregulates calsequestrin expression and reduces SR Ca2+ stores in cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;88(1):75–82. 10.1093/cvr/cvq180 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sa-Nguanmoo P, Tanajak P, Kerdphoo S, Jaiwongkam T, Pratchayasakul W, Chattipakorn N, et al. SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP-4 inhibitor improve brain function via attenuating mitochondrial dysfunction, insulin resistance, inflammation, and apoptosis in HFD-induced obese rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;333:43–50. 10.1016/j.taap.2017.08.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hawley SA, Ford RJ, Smith BK, Gowans GJ, Mancini SJ, Pitt RD, et al. The Na+/Glucose Cotransporter Inhibitor Canagliflozin Activates AMPK by Inhibiting Mitochondrial Function and Increasing Cellular AMP Levels. Diabetes. 2016;65(9):2784–94. 10.2337/db16-0058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nakano S, Katsuno K, Isaji M, Nagasawa T, Buehrer B, Walker S, et al. Remogliflozin Etabonate Improves Fatty Liver Disease in Diet-Induced Obese Male Mice. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(3):190–8. 10.1016/j.jceh.2015.02.005 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4632078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bonneau B, Prudent J, Popgeorgiev N, Gillet G. Non-apoptotic roles of Bcl-2 family: the calcium connection. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833(7):1755–65. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.01.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McHugh D, Flemming R, Xu SZ, Perraud AL, Beech DJ. Critical intracellular Ca2+ dependence of transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) cation channel activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(13):11002–6. Epub 2003/01/17. 10.1074/jbc.M210810200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Daskoulidou N, Zeng B, Berglund LM, Jiang H, Chen GL, Kotova O, et al. High glucose enhances store-operated calcium entry by upregulating ORAI/STIM via calcineurin-NFAT signalling. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93(5):511–21. 10.1007/s00109-014-1234-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Uthman L, Baartscheer A, Bleijlevens B, Schumacher CA, Fiolet JWT, Koeman A, et al. Class effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in mouse cardiomyocytes and hearts: inhibition of Na(+)/H(+) exchanger, lowering of cytosolic Na(+) and vasodilation. Diabetologia. 2018;61(3):722–6. 10.1007/s00125-017-4509-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bertero E, Prates Roma L, Ameri P, Maack C. Cardiac effects of SGLT2 inhibitors: the sodium hypothesis. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(1):12–8. 10.1093/cvr/cvx149 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Baartscheer A, Schumacher CA, Wust RC, Fiolet JW, Stienen GJ, Coronel R, et al. Empagliflozin decreases myocardial cytoplasmic Na(+) through inhibition of the cardiac Na(+)/H(+) exchanger in rats and rabbits. Diabetologia. 2017;60(3):568–73. 10.1007/s00125-016-4134-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bonner C, Kerr-Conte J, Gmyr V, Queniat G, Moerman E, Thevenet J, et al. Inhibition of the glucose transporter SGLT2 with dapagliflozin in pancreatic alpha cells triggers glucagon secretion. Nat Med. 2015;21(5):512–7. 10.1038/nm.3828 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Arow M, Waldman M, Yadin D, Nudelman V, Shainberg A, Abraham NG, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor Dapagliflozin attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):7 Epub 2020/01/12. 10.1186/s12933-019-0980-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Rodrigo Franco

29 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-22450

Protective effects of dapagliflozin against oxidative stress-induced cell injury in human proximal tubular cells

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

For this manuscript to be revised major concerns need to be addressed which include improved presentation/writing of the document, studying the relationship between SGLT proteins and oxidative stress and other concerns raised by the reviewer

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 13 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Rodrigo Franco

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional information about each of the cell lines used in this work, including the source of the inducible TRPM2 cells and any quality control testing procedures conducted (authentication, characterisation, and mycoplasma testing). For more information, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-cell-lines.

3. At this time, we ask that you please provide scale bars on the microscopy images presented in Figure 2E and 3C and refer to the scale bar in the corresponding Figure legend.

4.We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5.PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

6. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 8 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

7.We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Question 1: In the section of the results, the subtitles should highlight the central idea of the paragraph. Therefore, the results section should be elaborated in more detail.

Question 2: How did the authors choose to study on SGLT1 and SGLT2?

Question 3: The relationship between SGLT1 and SGLT2 and oxidative stress should be clarified.

Question 4: Method: how were the doses of dapagliflozin determined in in vivo? 

Question 5: The author should add in vivo experiments to further verify the role of dapagliflozin in oxidative stress-induced cell injury in human proximal tubular cells.

Question 6: It is unacceptable that the author made a great deal of discussion that they did not present in the results. The authors have to highlight the novelties of their work.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Rodrigo Franco

4 Feb 2021

Protective effects of dapagliflozin against oxidative stress-induced cell injury in human proximal tubular cells

PONE-D-20-22450R1

Dear Dr. Xu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Rodrigo Franco

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Rodrigo Franco

9 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-22450R1

Protective effects of dapagliflozin against oxidative stress-induced cell injury in human proximal tubular cells 

Dear Dr. Xu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Rodrigo Franco

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The full PCR gel and the cropped area presented in Fig 1.

    (PPTX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. We have given the procedures, part of raw data, analysis and graphs on the protocol hub: https://www.protocols.io/view/protocol-for-intracellular-ca2-detection-using-fle-bnubmesn.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES