Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Cancer. 2020 Nov 7;7(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.10.007

Education and outreach in physical sciences in oncology

Sierra A Walker 1,#, Anthony Pham 1,#, Sara Nizzero 2, Mingee Kim 2, Bob Riter 3, Julie Bletz 4, Sheila Judge 5, Benette Phillips 6, Dorottya Noble 7,8, Diana Murray 9, Erin Wetzel 10, Susan Samson 11,12, Mariah McMahon 13, Carl Flink 13, Jennifer Couch 10, Claire Tomlin 14, Kristin Swanson 15, Alexander R A Anderson 16, David Odde 13, Haifa Shen 17, Shannon Hughes 10, Nastaran Zahir 10,*, Heiko Enderling 16,*, Joy Wolfram 1,17,*
PMCID: PMC7895467  NIHMSID: NIHMS1669953  PMID: 33168416

Abstract

Physical sciences are often overlooked in the field of cancer research. The Physical Sciences in Oncology Initiative was launched to integrate physics, mathematics, chemistry, and engineering with cancer research and clinical oncology through education, outreach, and collaboration. Here we provide a framework for education and outreach in emerging transdisciplinary fields.

Keywords: cancer awareness, developing field, science education and outreach, scientific network

Physical Sciences-Oncology Network

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the United States launched the Physical Sciences-Oncology Network (PS-ON) to foster the integration of physical sciences (mathematics, chemistry, physics, and engineering) with the growing understanding of genetic and molecular contributions to cancer. This initiative has funded 22 multi-project research centers and 17 individual research projects for five years each (the first and second phases in 2009 and 2015, respectively). The current centers focus on the role of physical sciences approaches in tumorigenesis and growthi, cancer evolution and dynamicsii,iii,iv, cancer metabolismv, chromatin topology in cancervi, metastasisvii,viii, drug distribution and efficacyiv, and immunotherapeutic transportx. Each center is allocated education and outreach funds as important adjuncts for the advancement of new transdisciplinary initiatives. These resources have been used to disseminate new methods, technologies, and knowledge to students, researchers, and lay communities. The PS-ON has also convened an education and outreach working group and a patient advocacy working group that meet to highlight successes, share challenges, and identify collaborative opportunities. Here we describe efforts to train the next generation of researchers in the integration of physical sciences with conventional cancer research approaches and to communicate the importance of physical sciences in oncology with lay and patient communities.

Training the Next Generation

Typical education and training of clinicians and cancer researchers focuses predominantly on molecular and cellular biology and physiology. Therefore, most biomedical scientists are not well versed in advanced physical science approaches. This lack of knowledge can significantly hinder scientific discovery and the full optimization of patient care. To foster the inclusion of physical sciences into the training of new biomedical researchers, the PS-ON has developed educational and outreach programs that target young high school students. Early exposure to science or engineering can increase overall interest levels and improve comprehension of scientific topics [1]. Outreach programs can also counteract the lack of students pursuing technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers, which is especially acute for underrepresented minorities and disadvantaged students [1]. Several summer undergraduate research programs developed by the PS-ON provide early exposure to research that bridges disciplines with the goal of stimulating interest in careers that integrate various branches of science (Table 1). Such programs have been accompanied by web-based courses on data science approaches and predictive modeling in cancer research. These programs are also offered as part of graduate and post-graduate education to provide a more well-rounded education. Such initiatives have also provided early-career researchers with opportunities to develop skills in mentorship, scientific communication, and program organization.

Table 1.

Physical Sciences in Oncology Center (PSOC) Outreach Activities.

K-12
Activity Rationale Description Scientific Concepts Participation Results
Hands-on nanoparticle synthesis activity Nanoparticles are promising cancer therapeutics, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in nanoparticle synthesis (encompasses physical sciences, e.g., chemistry and engineering)
Real-world applications of nanomedicine counteract negative connotations of nanotechnology created from fictional portrayals in pop-culture
On-site activity or distance learning kits
Polymer cross-linking reactions to illustrate the formation of nanoparticle loaded with cancer drugs
Activity is accompanied by instructions sheets, an electronic presentation with discussion topics, and a videoxii
Activity kits have also been sent out to individuals and organizations, allowing instructors to independently implement the module with 50 K-12 students
Nanoparticle synthesis, drug loading ratios, and drug release
Participants < 7 years: An additional ‘balloon-nanocarrier’ activity can be performed, which involves placing a ‘secret message’ inside the balloon and delivering the pseudo-nanocarrier to a specific target (person) to illustrate nanodelivery concepts
Participants > 10 years: An additional ‘Design your own nanoparticle’ activity can be performed, which involves a poster presentation based on critical thinking of how to functionalize nanoparticles for improved delivery
~ 1000 participants/year (started in 2018) Results from an anonymous written survey: 100% of students that attended an outreach event with the activity strongly agreed that it was a good experience. 62% strongly agreed and 26% agreed that the event helped them choose a career
Hands-on nanodelivery
activity
Nanoparticles are promising cancer therapeutics, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in nanodelivery (encompasses physical sciences, e.g., mass transport, fluid dynamics, and pressure gradients in the body)
Real-world applications of nanomedicine counteract negative connotations of nanotechnology created from fictional portrayals in pop-culture
On-site activity
Wooden marble castle represents the body and marbles represent nanoparticles
Activity is accompanied by an educational booklet
Nanodelivery, nanoparticle transport in the body, and optimization of nanoparticle design ~ 700 participants/year (started in 2017) Results from an informal oral survey: Undergraduate students, graduate students, postgraduate fellows, faculty members, and patient advocates who have participated in the organization of this activity have described it as “simple, effective, and engaging”, and an experience that has helped them “understand the scope of the research”
High School Internship Program in Integrated Mathematical Oncology Mathematical and computational models are promising for understanding the complex dynamics of cancer, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in physical sciences (e.g., mathematical oncology) Eight-week summer internship program consisting of a boot camp for mathematical modeling and supervised research Mathematical oncology
Professional skill building: record keeping, laboratory techniques, and oral presentations
~12 students/year (started in 2015) Results from an anonymous written survey: Self-assessed skills are shown in Results from tracking of past students [6]: 100% went on to pursue a college degree. 35% pursued a double major in quantitative and life sciences with computer sciences being the dominant major. Two pursued a medical degree and two received undergraduate degrees and are enrolled in graduate programs for computer science, 5 peer-reviewed publications with high school student authors
Undergraduate
Activity Rationale Description Concepts Participation Results
Summer research program
(Chicago Region Physical Sciences in Oncology Center)
Multidisciplinary approaches are promising for addressing challenges in oncology, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in both physical sciences and cancer biology Eight-week summer research program
Designed to acquaint students with physical science majors with basic principles and methodologies in cancer research
Supervised research and participation in weekly cancer biology seminars/workshops
Cancer research, especially chromatin topology
Professional skill building: scientific writing, presentations, and laboratory techniques
~ 6 students/year (started in 2010) Results from tracking of past students: ~ 50% have been underrepresented minorities and over 90% have gone on to pursue a graduate or medical degree
Summer research program
(Center for Immunotherapeutic Transport Oncophysics)
Multidisciplinary approaches are promising for addressing challenges in oncology, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in both physical sciences and cancer biology 10-week summer research program
Supervised research
Mathematical oncology, biophysics, cancer research
Professional skill building: scientific writing, laboratory techniques, programming languages (i.e., MATLAB), and oral presentations
~ 2–5/year (started in 2017) Results from an informal oral survey: Students report that they have gained confidence in their aptitude for research and motivation for future projects in interdisciplinary biomedical research
Summer research program (National Cancer Institute) Multidisciplinary approaches are promising for addressing challenges in oncology, highlighting the need to train the next generation of systems biologists and physical oncologists, which begins with mentored research experiences that attract students to the field 10-week summer research program
Students conduct supervised research
Student present their work at a two-day conference at the National Institute of Health (NIH)
Oncophysics; cell and tissue mechanics; cancer evolution and dynamics; drug distribution and efficacy; immunotherapeutic transport; bioinformatics; systems biology; computational modeling
Professional skill building: laboratory techniques, computational data analysis, scientific writing, poster presentations, networking
~ 16 students / year (one student at each center (started in 2005) 21 of the 46 participants between 2017–2019 are still undergraduate students working towards their degrees 10 of the 25 who have completed undergraduate degrees have joined graduate programs in biomedical fields. 7 others have science-focused careers (2 are completing post baccalaureate fellowships at the NIH) 18 of 45 wrote or co-wrote a paper to be published in an academic journal
Web-Based Training (miniDREAM Challenge) There has been an exponential growth of data, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in bioinformatics and data science Several week-long web-based training modules in data science to supplement supervised research in summer research program
Inspired by DREAM challenges - crowd-sourced approaches for biomedical research [7]
Modules include use of data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and PS-ON [8] and the Cell Migration simulator [4]
Bioinformatic, data science, predictive modeling, biomedical research ~ 20 students/year (started in 2017)
Graduate and post-graduate
Activity Rationale Description Concepts Participation Results
Funding opportunities (sandpit and challenge-style workshops) [2] Multidisciplinary approaches are promising for addressing challenges in oncology, highlighting the need to foster cross-disciplinary team science and provide pilot project seed funding for early-stage investigators, who often face difficulties in obtaining federal funding support for nontraditional
approaches to cancer research
Competitions that provide pilot project funding for early-career researchers for multidisciplinary projects in cancer research
The goal is to provide support for generating preliminary data for NIH grant applications
Established investigators who are ineligible for the funding serve as impartial judges for junior participants
Interdisciplinary areas of cancer metastasis research ~ 25 early-stage investigators and 4 established investigator mentors (program active in 2017–2018) Four pilot project awards (active 2017–2018) and long-term outcome of two NIH awards on the collaborative projects
Fundamentals of Cancer Workshops Multidisciplinary approaches are promising for addressing challenges in oncology, highlighting the need to bring together researchers from physical sciences with oncologists and cancer biologists Half-day summer workshop where oncologists and cancer biologists address cancer-related topics at a level that is accessible to researchers who do not have a background in life sciences. Lectures are also available onlinexiii Fundamentals of cancer biology, metastasis, methods in cancer research, and therapeutic approaches ~ 90 participants / workshop (program started in 2010) Results from an anonymous survey: Participants had an intense interest in learning opportunities that provide a broad overview of needs and challenges in cancer research
Transport Oncophysics Workshop Multidisciplinary approaches are promising for addressing challenges in oncology, highlighting the need to bring together researchers from various fields One-day workshop with lectures, interactive tours, group projects, and group presentations Transport oncophysics Participants from more than 10 institutions (2016) Results from an anonymous written survey: The workshop received an overall rating of 9.2 on a scale from 1–10 (with 10 being the best)
Integrated Mathematical Oncology Workshop Mathematical and computational models are promising for understanding the complex dynamics of cancer, highlighting the need to bring together expertise from various fields to develop such models One-week workshop where teams of experts in clinical, experimental, and theoretical research and tasked with developing and implementing a mathematical model for the workshop theme Mathematical oncology, scientific discussions, practical tasks, and peer teaching > 700 participants (program started in 2011) Outcome: Publications from workshop projects [912], a dedicated bioRxiv channelxiv, and websitexv
Mathematical Oncology Meetings Mathematical and computational models are promising for understanding the complex dynamics of cancer, highlighting the need to bring together experts in the field to discuss challenges and opportunities Mathematicians have met on a biennial basis to share the current state of the art in mathematical oncology
Discussion topics have included ongoing work, challenges, solutions, and collaborative opportunities in the area of computational and mathematical modeling of cancer
Mathematical oncology and scientific discussions 60–100 participants / year (program started in 2011) Outcome: Establishment of the Handbook of Mathematical Oncology, a public shared resource of cancer models and modeling approaches in the form of short and succinct mini-papers. This resource currently consists of 50 papers that highlight key methods, concepts, and approaches underlying the state-of-the-art in mathematical oncology
Patient Engagement Curriculum [13] Understanding the patient perspective and the ability to effectively communicate science with lay audiences is likely to improve cancer research, highlighting the need to train the next generation of researchers in these skills Four-course curriculum for graduate students and post-graduate fellows focused on patient engagement
Patient interviews, seminars on public policy, and communication, and workshops where a lay audience evaluates scientific presentations
Patient advocacy and science communication ~ 30 participants / year (program started in 2013) Published reflections from course participants: “The patient-researcher partnership transformed our research from an intellectual exercise into a deeply personal endeavor. It reminds us that people with cancer are not merely cells or molecular pathways. They are neighbors, colleagues, friends, and relatives. They are valued partners in the fight against cancer [14].”
Lay communities
Activity Rationale Description Concepts Participation Results
Educational video (Research primer on mammographic density) Effectively communicating scientific concepts to lay audiences is promising for obtaining research support and informing individual/collective decision making Video conveying concepts in breast cancer in a manner that is accessible to lay audiencesxvi
Translated into Spanish to reach a wider audience
Relation of force, stress, viscosity, stiffness, plasticity and elasticity to cellular properties of growth, behavior and tumor progression Over 5,000 views since 2014 Outcome: Video has been shared as an abstract at the Physical Sciences in Oncology Network Investigator Meeting and at the American Association for Cancer Research Disparities Meeting [15]
Educational dance performance (Bodystorming) Effectively communicating scientific concepts to lay audiences is promising for obtaining research support and informing individual/collective decision making Professional dancers (Black Label Movement) create narrated choreographic simulations of scientific processes in a manner that is accessible to lay audiences [3]
An interactive module was developed for a K-12 classroom setting as well as scientific conferences (Neuro-Oncology Symposium 2018, PS-ON Annual Investigator’s Meeting 2019).
Diffusion, self-assembly, energy consumption, cell migration, cell division, cancer progression, and metastasis
[3, 4]
Estimated 3000 active participants (program started in 2009)
Estimated 550k-650k views of various TED talks on the subject
Results from an informal oral survey: Patients, artists, and caregivers reported that the performances made scientific ideas more easily accessible
Outcome: Demonstrations have become centerpieces at annual events such as the ‘Cancer in the Body’ event at the Science Museum of Minnesota and ‘Goldy vs. Cancer’ event held at the Minnesota State Fair
Bodystorming has prompted research ideas and further computational modeling resulting in a published scientific article [5]
Educational text (Public Interest Pieces) Effectively communicating scientific concepts to lay audiences is promising for obtaining research support and informing individual/collective decision making A one-page document conveying concepts in cancer research in a manner that is accessible to lay audiences
Student researchers, postgraduate fellows, or faculty members write these pieces together with patient advocates
Science communication
Cancer research
8–10 participants / year (program started in 2018)

These programs focus specifically on areas of the physical sciences that are currently underutilized despite having broad impact on cancer research and patient care including mathematical modeling and nanotechnology. Computational models are becoming increasingly important due to the exponential growth of data incorporating a range of biological scales (molecular, cellular, tissue, and organ) and diverse techniques (gene expression, histological staining, and imaging). Appropriate mathematical and computational models are promising for understanding the complex dynamics of the evolving non-linear system that is cancer. Such models must be adequately informed by data to generate testable hypotheses that iteratively inform new experiments, and ultimately translate into novel clinical strategies. Given the many needs and opportunities for training at this emerging interface of the PS-ON, an eight-week high school summer program based on mathematical oncology was established. This training aims to increase interest, engagement, and understanding of the biophysical and mathematical aspects of cancer research through sustained exposure to research professionals (Table 1). Moreover, cancer nanotechnology is an emerging transdisciplinary field that relies on chemistry, physics, and engineering. Nanoparticles show great potential as an additional category of therapeutic agents beyond small molecules and antibody therapeutics. But the development of more complex nanomedicines with greater therapeutic potential will only be realized after the successful integration of chemistry, physics, and engineering with cancer research. In addition, recent negative portrayals of nanotechnology in pop-culture, such as deadly nanobots, have misconstrued the positive impact of such technology for society. Therefore, outreach activities that demonstrate the advantages and real-world applications of nanomedicine could promote the development of new therapies. Such activities developed by the PS-ON include hands-on nanoparticle activities, focusing on nanoparticle synthesis and nanodelivery (Table 1).

To successfully establish a cultural shift that includes education as a cornerstone in new interdisciplinary fields, efforts should also be made to increase support for researchers to effectively share expertise with other investigators. To support such training, senior investigators within the PS-ON have developed workshops and new graduate courses that bridge the topics of physical sciences and oncology. These initiatives also train early-career researchers in professional skills, such as science communication (Table 1). Many of these workshops have involved interactive activities where participants take part in scientific discussions, practical tasks, and peer teaching, which is thought to maximize learning efficacy and retention. Meetings and poster sessions have also been dedicated to the work of students and postgraduate fellows, and opportunities have been provided for pilot project funding, especially for projects that involve interdisciplinary collaborations with early-career researchers (Table 1) [2]. Additionally, meetings for senior investigators have been organized to facilitate discussion on ongoing work, challenges, solutions, and collaborative opportunities, as well as develop shared public resources, e.g., a handbook of mathematical oncology (Table 1). Additionally, center advocates with expertise in entrepreneurship have played an important role in helping faculty members develop companies that can commercialize or license innovations. An exemplary success story is the ongoing commercialization of a revolutionary non-invasive method for early stage cancer screening, which is built on the discovery of nanoscale changes in DNA packaging in cancer cells.xi

Communicating with Lay Audiences

Substantial efforts have been made to include patient advocacy as cornerstones in the field of physical sciences in oncology. A resource offered to investigators to engage patient communities is the NCI Office of Advocacy Relations (OAR) [2]. Additionally, many PS-ON centers have patient advocates who work together with researchers to shape the direction of scientific projects and provide training for early-career investigators. Interactions between researchers, patient communities, and lay communities have helped convey the importance of the emerging field of physical sciences in oncology to the public, which is critical for promoting sustained support of research efforts and informing decision-making. Moreover, such interactions have served as educational platforms for researchers to consider the most pressing societal and medical needs that could benefit from scientific efforts.

Members of the PS-ON have organized several educational initiatives involving text and video-based resources to communicate the importance of physical sciences in oncology to a lay audience (Table 1). Additionally, dance and choreographic strategies accompanied by scientific narrations have been used as a tool to facilitate communication of research concepts to the public. Specifically, PS-ON investigators have teamed up with a professional dance company, the Black Label Movement, to develop scientific simulations, termed Bodystorming [3, 4]. For example, cell division can be physically modeled by a pair of participants beginning with their hands joined at shoulder height and slowly extending until both arms reach a fully outstretched position. At that point, two other participants join the simulation to break the bond of the original pair emulating cytokinesis. As the new set of “cells” join hands with the original “cell” participants, their hands are pushed back to their shoulders as they begin the process of outstretching their arms once again. The speed at which they extend their arms can be altered to model varying cell proliferation rates. A second variable, migration, can be introduced by varying the size, frequency, and direction of each step. Using these two variables alone the dynamics of cancer progression can be explored in terms of the formation of diffuse vs. defined margin tumors and implications of each tumor type on surgical resection outcomes. Bodystorming has also been incorporated in several scientific conferences, where researchers, dance artists, clinicians, and patient advocates have participated in simulation activities. In addition to building a more interconnected and inclusive research community, such choreographic simulations have also prompted research ideas and further computational modeling resulting in published scientific articles [5].

Concluding Remarks

The PS-ON has offered participating centers the opportunity to connect and unite researchers, clinicians, patients, and community members in the fight against cancer by increasing awareness and understanding of the advancements made in the field of physical sciences applied to cancer research. Exposing the next generation of researchers to physical sciences in oncology at a critical career stage is likely to ensure a certain amount of longevity for the developing field of physical sciences in oncology. The network has also provided many benefits to current members of the field by way of training opportunities and collaborations to advance ongoing research. Additionally, the emphasis placed on outreach to the community at large appears to have been a success in garnering interest and attention, and in building relationships and understanding among participants. Moving forward, efforts should be made to evaluate the long-term impact of these education and outreach programs.

Acknowledgements

The hands-on nanoparticle synthesis activity and supporting materials were developed by Anthony Pham under the guidance of Joy Wolfram. The balloon-nanocarrier activity was established by Sierra Walker, Anthony Pham, and Annie Suh. The hands-on nanodelivery activity and supporting material were developed by Sara Nizzero. The National Cancer Institute under award number U54CA210181 and Mayo Clinic supported the above activities. The High School Internship Program in Integrated Mathematical Oncology was established by Heiko Enderling. The leadership and organization of the NCI Summer Undergraduate Research Program is spearheaded by Erin Wetzel (NCI), Shannon Hughes (NCI), and Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc (Corinne Zeitler, Teresita Larida, and Alison Scott). The following individuals contributed to the miniDREAM challenge: Diana Murray, Shannon Hughes, Erin Wetzel, James Eddy, Justin Guinney, Julie Bletz, Milen Nikolov, Xengie Doan, Andrea Bild, Philip Moos, Jeffrey Chang, Andrew Gentles, Brian Castle, and Jay Hou. The Integrated Mathematical Oncology workshops were developed by Alexander R. A. Anderson. Stuart Cornew played an important role in translating innovations from the laboratory to society and assisted in the commercialization of Vadim Backman’s technology involving nanoscale changes in DNA packaging. The Fundamental of Cancer Workshops and the Chicago Region Physical Sciences in Oncology Center’s summer undergraduate research program were supported by the National Cancer Institute under award numbers U54CA143869 and U54CA193419, the Lurie Cancer Center, and the Chemistry of Life Processes Institute at Northwestern University. Jennifer Couch, Claire Tomlin, Kristin Swanson, and Alexander R. A. Anderson played a leading role in establishing the Handbook in Mathematical Oncology, while Jill Gallaher designed the cover image. The choreographic performances were developed by David Odde and Carl Flink. Susan Samson is a patient advocacy consultant and advisory board member for the Moving Cell Project (bodystorming project). The Bodystorming outreach is supported by the NCI under award number U54CA210190. Bob Riter, Robert Weiss, Peter DelNero, Alexandra McGregor, and other early-career researchers as well as community members were critical for establishing the Patient Engagement curriculum. The Basic Research Primer on Mammographic Density video was written and produced by Janice Barlow, Alexandra N. Anderson, Susan Samson, Irene Acerbi, Zena Werb, and Valerie M. Weavers. Narration was performed by Cheryl Jennings, and animation and design were done by Lori Schkufza. The funding for this project was provided by Zero Breast Cancer, University of California, San Francisco, and Breast Oncology Program/Breast Science Advocacy Core. Joy Wolfram serves as the current chair and Heiko Enderling served as the former chair of the PS-ON Education and Outreach Working Group. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Metz CJ, Downes S, and Metz MJ, The in’s and out’s of science outreach: assessment of an engaging new program. Adv Physiol Educ, 2018. 42(3): p. 487–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zahir N, The NCI Physical Sciences - Oncology Network. Trends Cancer, 2018. 4(4): p. e1–e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Flink C and Odde DJ, Science + dance = bodystorming. Trends Cell Biol, 2012. 22(12): p. 613–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bangasser BL, et al. , Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration. Nat Commun, 2017. 8: p. 15313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Powers JD, Castle BT, and Odde DJ, The predicted role of steric specificity in crowding-mediated effects on reversible biomolecular association. Phys Biol, 2015. 12(6): p. 066004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Enderling H, et al. , High School Internship Program in Integrated Mathematical Oncology (HIP IMO): Five-Year Experience at Moffitt Cancer Center. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2020. 82(7): p. 91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stolovitzky G, Monroe D, and Califano A, Dialogue on reverse-engineering assessment and methods: the DREAM of high-throughput pathway inference. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2007. 1115: p. 1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Physical Sciences - Oncology Centers, N., et al. , A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells. Sci Rep, 2013. 3: p. 1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Poleszczuk JT, et al. , Abscopal Benefits of Localized Radiotherapy Depend on Activated T-cell Trafficking and Distribution between Metastatic Lesions. Cancer Res, 2016. 76(5): p. 1009–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heidbuechel JPW, et al. , Mathematical Modeling of Oncolytic Virotherapy. Methods Mol Biol, 2020. 2058: p. 307–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Santiago DN, et al. , Fighting Cancer with Mathematics and Viruses. Viruses, 2017. 9(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gallaher J, et al. , Improving treatment strategies for patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer through personalized computational modeling. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2014. 31(8): p. 991–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Riter RN and Weiss RS, Connecting Students with Patients and Survivors to Enhance Cancer Research Training. Cancer Res, 2019. 79(16): p. 4011–4014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.DelNero P and McGregor A, From patients to partners. Science, 2017. 358(6361): p. 414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Samson S, et al. , New Horizons in Advocacy Engaged Physical Sciences and Oncology Research. Trends Cancer, 2018. 4(4): p. 260–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES