Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1287:59–68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-55031-8_5

NOTCH and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Yong Li a,b, Yahui Li b, Xiaoxin Chen b,c,*
PMCID: PMC7895477  NIHMSID: NIHMS1671656  PMID: 33034026

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a deadly disease that requires extensive research on its mechanisms, prevention, and therapy. Recent studies have shown that NOTCH mutations are commonly seen in human ESCC. This chapter summarizes our current understanding of the NOTCH pathway in normal esophagus and in ESCC. In normal esophagus, NOTCH pathway regulates the development of esophageal squamous epithelium, in particular, squamous differentiation. Exposure to extrinsic and intrinsic factors, such as gastroesophageal reflux, alcohol drinking, and inflammation, down-regulates the NOTCH pathway, and thus inhibits squamous differentiation of esophageal squamous epithelial cells. In ESCC, NOTCH plays a dual role as both a tumor suppressor pathway and an oncogenic pathway. In summary, further studies are warranted to develop NOTCH activators for the prevention of ESCC and NOTCH inhibitors for targeted therapy of a subset of ESCC with activated NOTCH pathway.

Keywords: NOTCH, Esophagus, Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Esophageal cancer affected 17,290 adults and caused 15,850 deaths in the US in 2018 (Cancer Facts & Figures 2018). In the world, it is the seventh most prevalent cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death, with more than 572,000 new cases and 508,000 deaths each year (1, 2). Two main histological types of esophageal cancer exist, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma. Human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) develops from precancerous lesions, and its histopathology follows a step-wise pattern of hyperplasia, dysplasia, and SCC. The 5-year survival rate for ESCC is ~18%, a number that reflects late diagnosis, the aggressiveness of the disease, and a lack of effective treatment strategies (3, 4). Thus, there is a great need to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms and develop better preventive and therapeutic strategies for ESCC.

Recent technological advances in NextGen sequencing enabled the detection of gene mutations in human ESCC samples (514). Common genomic alterations included single nucleotide variants, copy number alterations and alterations in multiple signaling pathways. The overall mutation pattern appeared similar to that of head and neck SCC (HNSCC) but distinct from that of esophageal adenocarcinoma and lung SCC. Genes on the NOTCH pathway were frequently mutated in human ESCC (3, 4). This observation brings about interesting questions regarding the functional role of the NOTCH pathway in the development of ESCC.

NOTCH IN NORMAL ESOPHAGUS

NOTCH pathway is mediated through ligands (JAG1, JAG2, DLL1, DLL3, DLL4) binding to NOTCH receptors (NOTCH1, 2, 3, 4). These receptors are then cleaved to allow its intracellular domain (e.g., NICD1) to be released from the membrane and enter the nucleus to form a transcriptional complex with RBPJ. NICD1 displaces the repressive cofactors bound to RBPJ and recruits a transcriptional activator complex, which initiates transcription of NOTCH downstream effectors like HES1 (15). In the normal esophagus of rodents and humans, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and NOTCH3 are highly expressed whereas NOTCH4 is expressed at a minimal level (16, 17). NOTCH3 expression was found to be subject to transcriptional regulation by NOTCH1, and loss of NOTCH signaling in mouse esophagus resulted in NOTCH3 silence (18). Nevertheless, NOTCH pathway is largely dispensable for maintaining the integrity of squamous epithelium. Although NOTCH1 is the major regulator of squamous differentiation among four NOTCH receptors, even in triple knockout mice (Notch1, Notch2, Notch3) the epidermis still formed almost normally except for the phenotypes of squamous hyperplasia and deficient barrier function (19).

Regulation of squamous differentiation by NOTCH:

NOTCH regulates squamous differentiation in the skin (20) and the esophagus (18, 21), particularly in the commitment of keratinocytes to terminal differentiation by a HES1-dependent mechanism (22, 23). Not surprisingly, NOTCH interacts with key regulators of squamous differentiation, such as P63 (24), IRF6 (25), NRF2 (26, 27), HPV8 E6 (28). Using gene microarray data of mouse esophagus at various developmental stages and ages, we found the NOTCH pathway participates in the development of mouse esophageal epithelium (29). Further studies have shown that NOTCH is required for the specification of esophageal progenitor cells from human progenitor stem cells. In agreement with these observations, genetic deficiency of NOTCH components (Rbpj, Jag1, Jag2) inhibited squamous differentiation in mouse esophagus (17).

NOTCH mutations in normal esophagus:

It is surprising that NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and NOTCH3 mutations occurred much more often in physiologically normal human esophageal epithelia (66.2% samples) than in ESCC (15% samples), and distribution pattern of the mutation sites was similar in normal and ESCC samples. Human subjects with ESCC risk factors (alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking, aging) were more likely to carry NOTCH mutations than those without these risk factors (3032). However, few of the mutations were present in all the cells of the normal clones, and many of the NOTCH mutations were found in spatially distinct subclones. These data suggest that NOTCH mutations are not sufficient to drive carcinogenesis, and some other mutations are needed. NOTCH mutations can be either driver or passenger mutations in human ESCC (33, 34).

Why normal esophageal epithelial cells are susceptible to NOTCH mutations? A recent report based solely on cancer genome sequencing and epidemiological data estimated that DNA replication errors may contribute to 38.9% gene mutations in ESCC, while hereditary mutations and environmental factors contribute to 0.5% and 60.6% mutations, respectively (35). This was believed to be due to a relatively high rate of stem cell division in the esophagus although debates still remain (36, 37). Interestingly, there was a significant decrease in the rate of stem cell division in the human esophagus with age. In contrast, only a small decrease was observed in the mouse esophagus. These data provide a plausible explanation for the enigmatic age-dependent deceleration in cancer incidence in very old humans but not in mice (38).

Response of the NOTCH pathway to gastroesophageal reflux:

Regurgitation of gastric and duodenal contents (e.g., acid and bile acids) into the esophagus causes heartburn and leads to substantial impairment of quality of life and work productivity. Some subjects with gastroesophageal reflux are further complicated with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) when histologic evidence of intestinal metaplasia is present in the human esophageal epithelium. Acid and bile acids inhibited the NOTCH pathway in esophageal squamous epithelial cells (3941), supporting an essential role of the NOTCH pathway in squamous differentiation. Moreover, inhibition of the NOTCH pathway favored goblet cell differentiation, which is diagnostic of human BE. Treatment of a rat model of reflux-induced BE with a γ-secretase inhibitor converted the proliferative Barrett’s epithelial cells into terminally differentiated goblet cells, whereas the squamous epithelium remained intact (42). When human esophageal squamous epithelial cells were stably transfected with an intestinal transcription factor, CDX2, these cells formed crypt-like structures, overexpressed differentiation markers of intestinal columnar epithelial cells and goblet cells, and downregulated NOTCH pathway genes (43). These data support NOTCH inhibition as one of the molecular mechanisms of human BE as a result of exposure to gastroesophageal reflux (44).

Response of the NOTCH pathway to alcohol drinking:

NOTCH pathway was inhibited by ethanol in the pancreas and smooth muscle cells (45, 46). Mechanistically, ethanol suppressed the NOTCH pathway through inhibition of γ-secretase proteolytic activity (47). In the esophagus, we first found out that ethanol exposure downregulated PAX9 expression in human esophageal epithelial cells in vitro and mouse forestomach and tongue in vivo (48). More importantly, PAX9 was found to be a downstream effector of the NOTCH pathway in esophageal squamous epithelial cells, and ethanol exposure inhibited the NOTCH pathway as well (unpublished data). Consistent with the function of NOTCH in squamous differentiation, we also showed that Pax9 deficiency in mouse esophagus promoted cell proliferation and delayed cell differentiation, and PAX9 was downregulated in human ESCC (48).

Response of the NOTCH pathway to inflammation:

Inflammatory cytokines (IL4, IL5, IL1, TNFα) suppressed NOTCH-dependent transcription, NOTCH ligands and NOTCH1 target genes in human esophageal epithelial cells. These changes contributed to the development of eosinophilic esophagitis and possibly inflammation-associated ESCC (49).

NOTCH in ESCC

NOTCH mutations in ESCC:

Based on the original data from two studies of 227 cases of human ESCC (7, 13), NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and NOTCH3 mutations took place in 8%, 3% and 1.9% of human ESCC, respectively. Point mutations tended to cluster in the EGF-like repeats and thus potentially resulted in the loss of function (Figure 1A, B, C). These mutations tended to be mutually exclusive (Figure 1D). RBPJ (a key repressor of canonical NOTCH pathway) and FBXW7 (the substrate-recognition subunit of an SCF-type ubiquitin ligase complex targeting NOTCH1) were also frequently mutated (50, 51). It was interesting that NOTCH1 mutation was mutually exclusive with PIK3CA mutation. NOTCH1 mutation was associated with well-differentiated, early-stage malignancy, and less metastasis to regional lymph nodes. Patients with NOTCH mutations tended to have a worse prognosis than those without (Figure 2). In contrast, patients with PIK3CA mutations had better response to chemotherapy and longer survival time than those without (52). Moreover, lower expression of NOTCH1 was associated with poorer prognosis than higher expression after adjustment for age, sex, tumor stage, smoking and alcohol consumption (10).

Figure 1. NOTCH mutations in human ESCC.

Figure 1.

These plots are downloaded from the TCGA database (www.cbioportal.org) based on the original data from two studies of 227 cases of human ESCC (7, 13). EGF-LR, epidermal growth factor-like repeat; LNR, LIN12-NOTCH repeat; NOD and NODP, NOTCH protein domain; ANK, Ankyrin repeats; DUF, domain of unknown function.

Figure 2. NOTCH mutations and prognosis of human ESCC.

Figure 2.

The plot is downloaded from the TCGA database (www.cbioportal.org) based on the survival data from one study of 88 cases of human ESCC (13).

NOTCH as a tumor suppressor pathway:

In the normal esophagus, NOTCH functions as a tumor suppressor (53). Exposure to an oro-esophageal carcinogen, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4NQO), caused loss of NOTCH1 expression in the basal cells of normal esophageal squamous epithelium, as well as Notch1 mutations. Loss of Notch1 in the squamous epithelial cells caused spontaneous SCC in the skin, but not the esophagus. However, loss of Notch1 promoted 4NQO-induced oro-esophageal SCC (54, 55). Similarly, NOTCH inhibition in mouse esophagus increased the number and size of tumors following exposure to an esophageal carcinogen, diethylnitrosamine (56).

Using the lineage tracing technique in mice carrying a conditional dominant-negative mutant of Maml1 (a transcriptional coactivator for NOTCH), Alcolea et al found that NOTCH inhibition prevented differentiation of mutant progenitor cells and promoted differentiation of neighboring wild-type progenitor cells in mouse esophagus (56). Such combined effects led to clonal expansion with mutant cells eventually replacing the entire epithelium, supporting the idea that NOTCH mutation promotes field change in the human esophageal epithelium (3032).

NOTCH as an oncogenic pathway:

However, the NOTCH pathway plays a dual role in carcinogenesis, both oncogenic and tumor suppressor, depending on the cellular and genetic context (53, 5760). It is believed that NOTCH pathway turns to be oncogenic during the process of carcinogenesis. In ESCC, cellular senescence checkpoint functions (e.g., P16-Rb, P14, P53) determined differential NOTCH1-dependent oncogenic and tumor-suppressor activities (61). Activated NOTCH1 was detected in a small subset of cancer cells at the invasive front in human ESCC, which correlated with higher tumor aggressiveness. NOTCH1 facilitated not only epithelial-mesenchymal transition but also TGFβ-mediated tumor initiation by increasing the number of cancer stem cells (62).

Similar to ESCC, NOTCH activity is contextual and NOTCH in HNSCC is considered to have a dual role as a tumor suppressor and an oncogene (63), at least in a subset of HNSCC based on genomics data (60). NOTCH4-HEY1 pathway induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cultured cells (64). Both deficiency and activation of Notch1 promoted oral squamous cell carcinogenesis in a genetic model driven by HPV E6/E7 and KrasG12D (59). Inactivation of the NOTCH pathway by a dominant-negative form of Maml1 promoted HNSCC induced by 4NQO, especially in the presence of p53 mutation or HPV16 E6/E7 oncoproteins (54). On the other hand, RBPJ acted as a tumor-promoting function in HNSCC (65).

CONCLUSION

Considering its function as a tumor suppressor, NOTCH activators may be used for the prevention of ESCC. Chemical NOTCH activators, e.g., resveratrol, valproic acid, chrysin, hesperetin, thiocoraline, N-methylhemeanthidine chloride (6671), may be further tested for their protective effect on ESCC. Other than chemical NOTCH activator, a NOTCH3 antibody is also known to activate NOTCH (72). NOTCH activation may also be achieved through inhibition of negative regulators of the NOTCH pathway, such as FBXW7 or NUMB. On the other hand, NOTCH inhibition needs to be explored as a potential therapy for a subset of ESCC with activated NOTCH pathway.

It should be noted that the NOTCH pathway is complicated in the esophagus just like in many other organs. NOTCH pathway in the normal esophagus behaves differently from that in ESCC. NOTCH target genes in the normal esophagus and those in ESCC need to be identified for functional characterization of the NOTCH pathway in these contexts. Moreover, it remains to be elucidated how NOTCH pathway discriminates between distinct ligands as well as receptors in these contexts (73). If we further consider NOTCH pathway in the tumor microenvironment (74) and non-canonical NOTCH pathway (75), it is obvious that a lot more studies are warranted to elucidate the sophisticated role of the NOTCH pathway in ESCC.

Abbreviations:

4NQO

4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide

BE

Barrett’s esophagus

ESCC

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

HNSCC

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

SCC

squamous cell carcinoma

REFRENCES

  • 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018. November;68(6):394–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017. January;67(1):7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kang X, Chen K, Li Y, Li J, D’Amico TA, Chen X. Personalized targeted therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology. 2015. July 7;21(25):7648–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Xiong Z, Beasley A, D’Amico T, Chen XL. Personalized and targeted therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an update. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016. October;1381(1):66–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Agrawal N, Jiao Y, Bettegowda C, Hutfless SM, Wang Y, David S, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2012. October;2(10):899–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gao YB, Chen ZL, Li JG, Hu XD, Shi XJ, Sun ZM, et al. Genetic landscape of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014. August 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin DC, Hao JJ, Nagata Y, Xu L, Shang L, Meng X, et al. Genomic and molecular characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014. May;46(5):467–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu W, Snell JM, Jeck WR, Hoadley KA, Wilkerson MD, Parker JS, et al. Subtyping sub-Saharan esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by comprehensive molecular analysis. JCI Insight. 2016. October 06;1(16):e88755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu X, Zhang M, Ying S, Zhang C, Lin R, Zheng J, et al. Genetic Alterations in Esophageal Tissues From Squamous Dysplasia to Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2017. July;153(1):166–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Qin HD, Liao XY, Chen YB, Huang SY, Xue WQ, Li FF, et al. Genomic Characterization of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveals Critical Genes Underlying Tumorigenesis and Poor Prognosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016. April 07;98(4):709–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sawada G, Niida A, Uchi R, Hirata H, Shimamura T, Suzuki Y, et al. Genomic Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Japanese Population. Gastroenterology. 2016. May;150(5):1171–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shibata T, Kokubu A, Saito S, Narisawa-Saito M, Sasaki H, Aoyagi K, et al. NRF2 mutation confers malignant potential and resistance to chemoradiation therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cancer. Neoplasia. 2011. September;13(9):864–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song Y, Li L, Ou Y, Gao Z, Li E, Li X, et al. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature. 2014. May 01;509(7498):91–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang L, Zhou Y, Cheng C, Cui H, Cheng L, Kong P, et al. Genomic analyses reveal mutational signatures and frequently altered genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2015. April 02;96(4):597–611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borggrefe T, Oswald F. The Notch signaling pathway: transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009. May;66(10):1631–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sander GR, Powell BC. Expression of notch receptors and ligands in the adult gut. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004. April;52(4):509–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang Y, Yang Y, Jiang M, Huang SX, Zhang W, Al Alam D, et al. 3D Modeling of Esophageal Development using Human PSC-Derived Basal Progenitors Reveals a Critical Role for Notch Signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2018. October 4;23(4):516–29 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ohashi S, Natsuizaka M, Yashiro-Ohtani Y, Kalman RA, Nakagawa M, Wu L, et al. NOTCH1 and NOTCH3 coordinate esophageal squamous differentiation through a CSL-dependent transcriptional network. Gastroenterology. 2010. December;139(6):2113–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Demehri S, Turkoz A, Kopan R. Epidermal Notch1 loss promotes skin tumorigenesis by impacting the stromal microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2009. July 7;16(1):55–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okuyama R, Tagami H, Aiba S. Notch signaling: its role in epidermal homeostasis and in the pathogenesis of skin diseases. J Dermatol Sci. 2008. March;49(3):187–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ohashi S, Natsuizaka M, Naganuma S, Kagawa S, Kimura S, Itoh H, et al. A NOTCH3-mediated squamous cell differentiation program limits expansion of EMT-competent cells that express the ZEB transcription factors. Cancer Res. 2011. November 1;71(21):6836–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Canonical notch signaling functions as a commitment switch in the epidermal lineage. Genes Dev. 2006. November 1;20(21):3022–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang X, Pasolli HA, Williams T, Fuchs E. AP-2 factors act in concert with Notch to orchestrate terminal differentiation in skin epidermis. J Cell Biol. 2008. October 6;183(1):37–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tadeu AM, Horsley V. Notch signaling represses p63 expression in the developing surface ectoderm. Development. 2013. September;140(18):3777–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Restivo G, Nguyen BC, Dziunycz P, Ristorcelli E, Ryan RJ, Ozuysal OY, et al. IRF6 is a mediator of Notch pro-differentiation and tumour suppressive function in keratinocytes. EMBO J. 2011. November 16;30(22):4571–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wakabayashi N, Skoko JJ, Chartoumpekis DV, Kimura S, Slocum SL, Noda K, et al. Notch-nrf2 axis: regulation of nrf2 gene expression and cytoprotection by notch signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2013. February;34(4):653–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wakabayashi N, Shin S, Slocum SL, Agoston ES, Wakabayashi J, Kwak MK, et al. Regulation of notch1 signaling by nrf2: implications for tissue regeneration. Sci Signal. 2010;3(130):ra52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meyers JM, Spangle JM, Munger K. The human papillomavirus type 8 E6 protein interferes with NOTCH activation during keratinocyte differentiation. J Virol. 2013. April;87(8):4762–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen H, Li J, Li H, Hu Y, Tevebaugh W, Yamamoto M, et al. Transcript profiling identifies dynamic gene expression patterns and an important role for Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in the developing mouse esophagus. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yokoyama A, Kakiuchi N, Yoshizato T, Nannya Y, Suzuki H, Takeuchi Y, et al. Age-related remodelling of oesophageal epithelia by mutated cancer drivers. Nature. 2019. January;565(7739):312–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Martincorena I, Fowler JC, Wabik A, Lawson ARJ, Abascal F, Hall MWJ, et al. Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age. Science. 2018. November 23;362(6417):911–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yizhak K, Aguet F, Kim J, Hess JM, Kubler K, Grimsby J, et al. RNA sequence analysis reveals macroscopic somatic clonal expansion across normal tissues. Science. 2019. June 7;364(6444). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chanock SJ. The paradox of mutations and cancer. Science. 2018. November 23;362(6417):893–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ciccarelli FD. Mutations differ in normal and cancer cells of the oesophagus. Nature. 2019. January;565(7739):301–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tomasetti C, Li L, Vogelstein B. Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention. Science. 2017. March 24;355(6331):1330–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu S, Powers S, Zhu W, Hannun YA. Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer development. Nature. 2016. January 7;529(7584):43–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tomasetti C, Durrett R, Kimmel M, Lambert A, Parmigiani G, Zauber A, et al. Role of stem-cell divisions in cancer risk. Nature. 2017. August 9;548(7666):E13–E4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tomasetti C, Poling J, Roberts NJ, London NR Jr., Pittman ME, Haffner MC, et al. Cell division rates decrease with age, providing a potential explanation for the age-dependent deceleration in cancer incidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. October 8;116(41):20482–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang YC, Wang ZQ, Yuan Y, Ren T, Ni PZ, Chen LQ. Notch Signaling Pathway Is Inhibited in the Development of Barrett’s Esophagus: An In Vivo and In Vitro Study. Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2018;2018:4149317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yuan Y, Tong TJ, Zeng XX, Yang YS, Wang ZQ, Wang YC, et al. Longitudinal study of esophageal mucosal damage after esophagectomy and gastric interposition: relationship between reflux-related mucosal injury and Notch signaling. Journal of thoracic disease. 2017. December;9(12):5249–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Morrow DJ, Avissar NE, Toia L, Redmond EM, Watson TJ, Jones C, et al. Pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus: bile acids inhibit the Notch signaling pathway with induction of CDX2 gene expression in human esophageal cells. Surgery. 2009. October;146(4):714–21; discussion 21–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Menke V, van Es JH, de Lau W, van den Born M, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD, et al. Conversion of metaplastic Barrett’s epithelium into post-mitotic goblet cells by gamma-secretase inhibition. Dis Model Mech. 2010. Jan-Feb;3(1–2):104–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu T, Zhang X, So CK, Wang S, Wang P, Yan L, et al. Regulation of Cdx2 expression by promoter methylation, and effects of Cdx2 transfection on morphology and gene expression of human esophageal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 2007. February;28(2):488–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen H, Fang Y, Tevebaugh W, Orlando RC, Shaheen NJ, Chen X. Molecular mechanisms of Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2011. December;56(12):3405–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schneider KJ, Scheer M, Suhr M, Clemens DL. Ethanol administration impairs pancreatic repair after injury. Pancreas. 2012. November;41(8):1272–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Morrow D, Cullen JP, Liu W, Cahill PA, Redmond EM. Alcohol inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation via regulation of the Notch signaling pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010. December;30(12):2597–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hatch E, Morrow D, Liu W, Cahill PA, Redmond EM. Ethanol inhibits gamma-secretase proteolytic activity in vascular smooth muscle cells. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015. November;39(11):2115–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xiong Z, Ren S, Chen H, Liu Y, Huang C, Zhang YL, et al. PAX9 regulates squamous cell differentiation and carcinogenesis in the oro-oesophageal epithelium. J Pathol. 2018. February;244(2):164–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kasagi Y, Chandramouleeswaran PM, Whelan KA, Tanaka K, Giroux V, Sharma M, et al. The Esophageal Organoid System Reveals Functional Interplay Between Notch and Cytokines in Reactive Epithelial Changes. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. March;5(3):333–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chang J, Tan W, Ling Z, Xi R, Shao M, Chen M, et al. Genomic analysis of oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma identifies alcohol drinking-related mutation signature and genomic alterations. Nat Commun. 2017. May 26;8:15290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cheng C, Cui H, Zhang L, Jia Z, Song B, Wang F, et al. Genomic analyses reveal FAM84B and the NOTCH pathway are associated with the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. GigaScience. 2016;5:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Song B, Cui H, Li Y, Cheng C, Yang B, Wang F, et al. Mutually exclusive mutations in NOTCH1 and PIK3CA associated with clinical prognosis and chemotherapy responses of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China. Oncotarget. 2016. January 19;7(3):3599–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nowell CS, Radtke F. Notch as a tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017. March;17(3):145–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nyman PE, Buehler D, Lambert PF. Loss of Function of Canonical Notch Signaling Drives Head and Neck Carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2018. December 15;24(24):6308–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sawangarun W, Mandasari M, Aida J, Morita KI, Kayamori K, Ikeda T, et al. Loss of Notch1 predisposes oro-esophageal epithelium to tumorigenesis. Experimental cell research. 2018. November 15;372(2):129–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alcolea MP, Greulich P, Wabik A, Frede J, Simons BD, Jones PH. Differentiation imbalance in single oesophageal progenitor cells causes clonal immortalization and field change. Nature cell biology. 2014. June;16(6):615–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lobry C, Oh P, Aifantis I. Oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions of Notch in cancer: it’s NOTCH what you think. J Exp Med. 2011. September 26;208(10):1931–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ranganathan P, Weaver KL, Capobianco AJ. Notch signalling in solid tumours: a little bit of everything but not all the time. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011. May;11(5):338–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhong R, Bao R, Faber PW, Bindokas VP, Bechill J, Lingen MW, et al. Notch1 Activation or Loss Promotes HPV-Induced Oral Tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2015. September 15;75(18):3958–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sun W, Gaykalova DA, Ochs MF, Mambo E, Arnaoutakis D, Liu Y, et al. Activation of the NOTCH pathway in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2014. February 15;74(4):1091–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kagawa S, Natsuizaka M, Whelan KA, Facompre N, Naganuma S, Ohashi S, et al. Cellular senescence checkpoint function determines differential Notch1-dependent oncogenic and tumor-suppressor activities. Oncogene. 2015. April 30;34(18):2347–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Natsuizaka M, Whelan KA, Kagawa S, Tanaka K, Giroux V, Chandramouleeswaran PM, et al. Interplay between Notch1 and Notch3 promotes EMT and tumor initiation in squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2017. November 24;8(1):1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fukusumi T, Califano JA. The NOTCH Pathway in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of dental research. 2018. June;97(6):645–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fukusumi T, Guo TW, Sakai A, Ando M, Ren S, Haft S, et al. The NOTCH4-HEY1 Pathway Induces Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018. February 1;24(3):619–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Al Labban D, Jo SH, Ostano P, Saglietti C, Bongiovanni M, Panizzon R, et al. Notch-effector CSL promotes squamous cell carcinoma by repressing histone demethylase KDM6B. J Clin Invest. 2018. June 1;128(6):2581–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wyche TP, Dammalapati A, Cho H, Harrison AD, Kwon GS, Chen H, et al. Thiocoraline activates the Notch pathway in carcinoids and reduces tumor progression in vivo. Cancer Gene Ther. 2014. December;21(12):518–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Patel PN, Yu XM, Jaskula-Sztul R, Chen H. Hesperetin activates the Notch1 signaling cascade, causes apoptosis, and induces cellular differentiation in anaplastic thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. December;21 Suppl 4:S497–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yu XM, Phan T, Patel PN, Jaskula-Sztul R, Chen H. Chrysin activates Notch1 signaling and suppresses tumor growth of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer. 2013. February 15;119(4):774–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pinchot SN, Jaskula-Sztul R, Ning L, Peters NR, Cook MR, Kunnimalaiyaan M, et al. Identification and validation of Notch pathway activating compounds through a novel high-throughput screening method. Cancer. 2011. April 01;117(7):1386–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Greenblatt DY, Vaccaro AM, Jaskula-Sztul R, Ning L, Haymart M, Kunnimalaiyaan M, et al. Valproic acid activates notch-1 signaling and regulates the neuroendocrine phenotype in carcinoid cancer cells. Oncologist. 2007. August;12(8):942–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ye Q, Jiang J, Zhan G, Yan W, Huang L, Hu Y, et al. Small molecule activation of NOTCH signaling inhibits acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Rep. 2016. May 23;6:26510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li K, Li Y, Wu W, Gordon WR, Chang DW, Lu M, et al. Modulation of Notch signaling by antibodies specific for the extracellular negative regulatory region of NOTCH3. J Biol Chem. 2008. March 21;283(12):8046–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nandagopal N, Santat LA, LeBon L, Sprinzak D, Bronner ME, Elowitz MB. Dynamic Ligand Discrimination in the Notch Signaling Pathway. Cell. 2018. February 8;172(4):869–80 e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Meurette O, Mehlen P. Notch Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2018. October 8;34(4):536–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Steinbuck MP, Winandy S. A Review of Notch Processing With New Insights Into Ligand-Independent Notch Signaling in T-Cells. Frontiers in immunology. 2018;9:1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES