Skip to main content
Frontiers in Psychology logoLink to Frontiers in Psychology
. 2021 Feb 8;11:643027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.643027

Corrigendum: An Extensive Knowledge Mapping Review of Measurement and Validity in Language Assessment and SLA Research

Vahid Aryadoust 1,*, Azrifah Zakaria 1, Mei Hui Lim 2, Chaomei Chen 3,4
PMCID: PMC7898351  PMID: 33628195

In the original article, there were several errors throughout the text. The corrections made are detailed in the table below.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Mistake made Name of section/subsection Paragraph number Corrected text
Lado (1961) and the book chapter of Carroll (1961), INTRODUCTION 1 (p.1, line 113) Lado's (1961) and the book chapter of Carroll's (1961),
Fulcher (n.d.) INTRODUCTION 1 (p.2 line 133) (Fulcher, n.d.)
in Bachman (1990) view Second Aim 3 (p.3 line 271) in Bachman's (1990) view
of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) Second Aim 2 (p.3, l. 292) of Cronbach and Meehl's (1955)
Messick Second Aim 2 (p.3, l. 300) Messick's
Kane (2006) frameworks Second Aim 2 (p.3, l.301) Kane's (2006) frameworks
Weir (2005b) socio-cognitive framework or Second Aim 3 (p.3, l.306) Weir's (2005b) socio-cognitive framework or
Borsboom and Mellenbergh (2007) test Second Aim 3 (p.3, l.306-307) Borsboom and Mellenbergh's (2007) test
Borsboom and Mellenbergh (2007) work Second Aim 3 (p.3, l.308-309) Borsboom and Mellenbergh's (2007) work
Weir (2005a) framework Second Aim 3 (p.3, l.311) Weir's (2005a) framework
target use domain (TLU) Table 1, Row 1, Column 2 p.6, l. 574-575 target language use (TLU) domain
patterns on Table 1, Row 4, Column 3 p. 6, l.650 patterns.
e.g., of which are too First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 0: Language assessment (and comprehension) 2 (p.13, l.1477) examples of which are too
Carr (2006) study First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 0: Language assessment (and comprehension) 3 (p.16, l.1722) Carr's (2006) study
Bachman and Palmer (1996) task characteristics First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 0: Language assessment (and comprehension) 3 (p.16, l.1723) Bachman and Palmer's (1996) task characteristics
Carr (2006) investigation First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 0: Language assessment (and comprehension) 3 (p.16, l.1724) Carr's (2006) investigation
Doughty (2001) work First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 0: Language assessment (and comprehension) 6 (p.16, l.1769) Doughty's (2001) work
Banerjee et al. (2015) article First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 1: Rating (and Validation) 2 (p.16, l.1814) Banerjee et al.'s (2015) article
Ortega (2003) First Aim: Characterizing the Detected Clusters; Cluster 1: Rating (and Validation) 3 (p.17, l.1834) Ortega's (2003)
Long (2007)'s Cluster 1: Language Acquisition (Implicit vs. explicit) 1 (p. 17, l. 1922) Long's (2007)
Aksnes et al. (2019) cautions CONCLUSION 2 (p.22, l.2492) Aksnes et al.'s (2019) cautions
DCA was conducted twice times First Aim: Document Co-Citation Analysis (DCA) 1, (p. 4, l. 436) DCA was conducted twice
Schmitt (2008) review Cluster 2: Vocabulary Learning 1, (p.19, l. 2099) Schmitt's (2008) review
Kane (2006) Conclusion 3, (p.23, l.2510) Kane's (2006)

References

  1. Aksnes D. W., Langfeldt L., Wouters P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. Sage Open 9, 1–17. 10.1177/2158244019829575 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachman L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachman L. F., Palmer A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerjee J., Yan X., Chapman M., Elliott H. (2015). Keeping up with the times: revising and refreshing rating scale. Assess.Writ. Int. J. 26, 5–19. 10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borsboom D., Mellenbergh G. J. (2007). “Test validity in cognitive assessment,” in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education: Theory and Applications, eds J. P. Leighton, and M. J. Gierl (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; ), 85–115. 10.1017/CBO9780511611186.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carr N. T. (2006). The factor structure of test task characteristics and examinee performance. Lang. Test. 23, 269–289. 10.1191/0265532206lt328oa [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carroll J. B. (1961) “Fundamental considerations in testing for english language proficiency of foreign students,” in Testing Center for Applied Linguistics (Washington, DC). Reprinted in Allen, H.B. & Campbell, R.N. (eds.). (1972) Teaching English as a Second Language: A Book of Readings; McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cronbach L. J., Meehl P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52, 281–302. 10.1037/h0040957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doughty C. (2001). “Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form,” in Cognition and Second Language Instruction, eds P. Robinson, M. H. Long, and J. C. Richards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; ) 206–257. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fulcher G. (n.d.). What Is Language Testing. Language Testing Resources. Available online at: http://languagetesting.info/whatis/lt.html.
  11. Kane M. T. (2006). “Validation,” in Educational Measurement, 4th Edn, ed R. L. Brennan (Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger; ), 17–64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lado R. (1961). Language Testing: The Construction and Use of Foreign Language Tests: A Teacher's Book. Bristol: Inglaterra Longmans, Green and Company. [Google Scholar]
  13. Long M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ortega L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: a research synthesis of college-level L2 Writing. Appl. Linguist. 24, 492–518. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmitt N. (2008). Review article: instructed second language vocabulary learning. Lang. Teach. Res. 12, 329–363. 10.1177/1362168808089921 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weir C. J. (2005a). Language Testing and Validation :An Evidence-Based Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  17. Weir C. J. (2005b). Language Testing and Validation. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 10.1057/9780230514577 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES