The year 2020 will forever be cast in a negative light because of the coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) pandemic that changed everyday life globally, with nearly 220 countries and territories experiencing its devastating impact. As 2020 came to an end, based on the data supplied by the World Health Organization, the novel coronavirus had infected over 81 million people worldwide and nearly 1.8 million people had died because of complications of COVID-19 (1). These numbers continue to grow at alarming rates. Whole countries or states across the globe have enacted rules designed to limit the spread of the virus by requiring inhabitants to stay home and adhere to social distancing; nonessential businesses have closed their doors, including restaurants, theaters, performing arts centers, barber shops, health clubs, and even churches. In many cases, schools have changed to online learning or at least markedly limited face-to-face activities; many youth, college, and professional sporting events have been canceled; and national and international travel has been curtailed. In many places, science laboratories were shuttered for months. The changes in life precipitated by COVID-19 have the potential to change human behavior forever and have certainly changed the everyday life of biomedical researchers and educators (2).
Despite the global anxiety posed by the novel coronavirus, a bright spot is how it brought together teams of scientists across the globe who cooperated to develop treatments that hopefully will help to bring an end to fatalities linked to the pandemic (3). Remarkably, by the time 2020 came to an end, several manufacturers (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna) had begun to release vaccines in multiple countries with high efficacy to control the devastating actions of the virus that causes COVID-19 (4). In fact, there are over 50 candidate vaccines under development globally, allowing us to see at least a glimpse of that proverbial “light at the end of the tunnel.”
In late summer 2020, the Board of the General Assembly of the International Union of Physiological Sciences (BGA/IUPS) reached out to member societies to gather information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their society operations and the activities of their members. Feedback was received from 25 physiological societies representing Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe/European Union, the Mideast, and Oceania. Table 1 and Table 2 capture the responses received to two pointed questions, respectively:
Table 1.
How has COVID-19 impacted the functioning of your Society?
| Member Organization | Response |
|---|---|
| American Physiological Society |
|
| Australian Physiological Society |
|
| Bangladesh Society of Physiologists |
|
| Bulgarian Society for Physiological Sciences |
|
| Canadian Physiological Society |
|
| Chilean Society of Physiological Sciences |
|
| Chinese Association for Physiological Sciences |
|
| Chinese Physiological Society in Taipei |
|
| Cuban Society of Biomedical Basic Sciences (formerly Cuban Society of Physiological Sciences) |
|
| Finnish Physiological Society |
|
| French Society of Physiology |
|
| German Physiological Society |
|
| Iranian Society of Physiology and Pharmacology |
|
| Israel Society of Physiology and Pharmacology |
|
| Life Science Switzerland (LS2)-Physiology |
|
| Physiological Society of India |
|
| Physiological Society of Japan |
|
| Physiological Society of Nepal |
|
| Physiological Society of Nigeria |
|
| Physiological Society of New Zealand |
|
| Slovak Physiological Society |
|
| Slovenian Physiological Society |
|
| Spanish Society of Physiological Sciences |
|
| The Physiological Society |
|
| Turkish Association of Physiological Sciences |
|
Table 2.
How has your Society assisted its members to deal with the impact of COVID-19 on their teaching and research?
| Member Organization | Response |
|---|---|
| American Physiological Society |
|
| Australian Physiological Society |
|
| Bangladesh Society of Physiologists |
|
| Bulgarian Society for Physiological Sciences |
|
| Chilean Society of Physiological Sciences |
|
| Chinese Association for Physiological Sciences |
|
| Chinese Physiological Society in Taipei |
|
| Cuban Society of Biomedical Basic Sciences (formerly Cuban Society of Physiological Sciences) |
|
| Finnish Physiological Society |
|
| French Society of Physiology |
|
| German Physiological Society |
|
| Iranian Society of Physiology and Pharmacology |
|
| Israel Society of Physiology and Pharmacology |
|
| Life Science Switzerland (LS2)-Physiology |
|
| Physiological Society of Japan |
|
| Physiological Society of Nepal |
|
| Physiological Society of Nigeria |
|
| Physiological Society of New Zealand |
|
| Slovak Physiological Society |
|
| Spanish Society of Physiological Sciences |
|
| The Physiological Society |
|
| Turkish Association of Physiological Sciences |
|
How has COVID-19 impacted the functioning of your Society?
How has your Society assisted its members to deal with the impact of COVID-19 on their teaching and research?
The most common problematic impact of the pandemic on the functioning of the societies was the need to cancel (n = 16) or postpone (n = 3) in-person annual physiological meetings, a main way in which members interact and exchange information on their latest research activities. Some of these societies (n = 9) were able to convert all or part of their planned meeting to a virtual format. At least four societies (American Physiological Society, Hungarian Physiological Society, Iranian Society of Physiology and Pharmacology, and the Physiological Society of Japan) have already determined that, out of an abundance of caution, their annual meeting in 2021 will be a virtual one. At least nine societies have been able to continue to communicate with and engage their members during the pandemic by conducting periodic research and educational and career development webinars/seminars/workshops with web-based platforms, which have been well attended and appreciated by their members. For example, the Physiological Society of India has organized five symposia in conjunction with several colleges/universities with a focus on various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including ways to maintain physical and mental wellness. One advantage of these virtual sessions is that they allow for easy participation of international members of societies.
At least 10 societies have continued to hold their regular council, board, and committee meetings by converting them from an in-person to an online format, which has helped to maintain much of the routine organizational operation. At least some member organizations have found that working remotely has not hampered, and perhaps even improved, efficiency by not requiring travel to a meeting. The American Physiological Society noted a bonus to going virtual because “potential budget shortfalls… have been to some extent balanced by a large reduction in travel and associated costs normally expended to assemble committee members and leaders for a variety of meetings. It is likely that reduced travel expenses will be a permanent feature of our budgeting even when we move out of pandemic mode.” On the other hand, not all societies have the technology needed to conduct their meetings with a web-based system like Zoom, and they have had to depend on phone calls or e-mails to connect with members and staff.
Societies like the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society with robust journal programs have provided their members with extensive resources to highlight their work to discover the pathophysiological basis for COVID-19 and why the physiological changes associated with aging are so significant, for the development of more effective testing for the presence of the virus and its antibodies, and for the discovery of effective treatments and vaccines. The Physiological Society created a COVID-19 Advisory Panel that provides updates on the physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning this disease with the aim of enhancing patient outcomes.
Several societies were pleased to announce that their publications have been able to continue uninterrupted and to serve as a valuable resource for their members and scientists globally. Some societies commented that they have conducted special informational meetings or published special journal and newsletter articles to educate their members on the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and how to counteract it.
The Physiological Society of Nepal noted the severe impact that the pandemic has had on the finances of the society and its members. Sadly, with the COVID-19-required closures, not only have research laboratories been shuttered but for several months the colleges adopted a “no work no pay” policy. Even now, most colleges are providing a heavily reduced salary. Some societies have assisted the members financially. For example, The Physiological Society provided financial aid to its members who faced difficult financial situations due to COVID-19, and the Spanish Society of Physiological Sciences suspended 2020 dues payments for its members. Through the Women in Physiology Committee, the American Physiological Society introduced a “dependent care” grant program to provide financial support to those who need help while they attend virtual events online.
Many of the societies mentioned the at least temporary closure of research laboratories and the need for students to move toward remote learning and online examinations. As shown in Table 2, where possible, societies have strived to use resources to help their members deal with the impact of COVID-19 on their research and teaching. For example, the American Physiological Society, Chinese Physiological Society in Taipei, the Physiological Society of Japan, and The Physiological Society have sponsored discussion forums or surveys to assess how the pandemic has impacted research and teaching activities of their members and how the societies can help them cope. The Physiological Society also convened a meeting of 650 physiologists to discuss problems and share advice on returning to laboratory research safely during the pandemic, informing the production of guidance documents for the physiology community. The Australian Physiological Society increased the monetary value of their PhD grant program to support student researchers and are offering online meetings for students, early career members, and physiology educators to present their research.
The Chilean Society of Physiological Sciences created a meeting in which undergraduate and graduate students who could not be in their laboratories to collect data had the opportunity to receive feedback on their hypotheses. This was a way for trainees to describe their research ideas and future projects. The Chinese Association for Physiological Sciences launched a series of symposia domestically and internationally on best standards of teaching and training undergraduate and postgraduate educators in the physiological discipline. The Chinese Physiological Society in Taipei launched a new International Affairs and Physiology Education Committee to proactively prepare for any upcoming difficulty. Life Science Switzerland (LS2)-Physiology has hosted platforms of e-Teaching and/or new teaching formats that combine self-motivating learning with provided videos, recorded slides, extracts of textbook materials, and repeated interactive courses for its members.
The mental state of students, teachers, and researchers (as well as citizens of many countries) in COVID-19 times is yet another issue of concern. These unnatural conditions in which we are now living bring about depression in susceptible individuals who are homebound with limited outside access, hooked to online classes or programs, and not able to do undertake physical activities outside the home. The Physiological Society created online training courses (using videos and e-learning platforms) and guidance on providing a supportive environment for the management of stress.
Overall, the responses from the 25 physiological societies across the globe offered an optimistic outlook and a community of researchers and educators who are united on a singular focus to help prevent more victims of this devastating pandemic and to bring us back to homeostasis.
Acknowledgments
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/table.
- 2.Haug N, Geyrhofer L, Londei A, Dervic E, Desvars-Larrive A, Loreto V, Pinior B, Thurner S, Klimek P. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nat Hum Behav 4: 1303–1312, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zamora-Ledezma C, Clavijo DF, Medina E, Sinche F, Vispo N, Dahoumane SA, Alexis F. Biomedical science to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic: current status and future perspectives. Molecules 25: 4620, 2020. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dong Y, Dai T, Wei Y, Zhang L, Zheng M, Zhou F. A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5: 237, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00352-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
